Advanced Hurricane Prediction A plan for research and development Naomi Surgi February, 2005.
-
Upload
hector-strickland -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of Advanced Hurricane Prediction A plan for research and development Naomi Surgi February, 2005.
Requirements Process
Societal Impacts:• More people living along coastal areas –
takes longer to evacuate• Evacuations are costly: ~$1M per mile of
coastline evacuated• Evacuation numbers depend on hurricane
size and intensity• More hurricane related fatalities now due to
inland flooding
Stakeholder Requirements• Improved track forecast skill – where and
when?
Extend track forecasts out to 5 days
• Improved hurricane intensity forecasts
intensity at landfall – how strong?
onset of gale force winds at coastline (structure) – how big & when?
• Skillful heavy rainfall forecasts out to 3 days in advance
• Continued advancement of TC track forecasts
• Improved TC intensity prediction (genesis and
rapid intensification)
• Improved prediction of TC surface wind
distribution (structure)
• Improved rainfall forecasts
• TC waves, storm surge
Operational TC Forecast Issues:
TPC Atlantic 72-hr Track Forecast Errors
With the exception of “erratically” moving storms, while hurricane track prediction has shown remarkable progress, skill in predicting intensity/ structure changes is still poor. It is expected that high resolution, advanced NWP modeling systems may continue to improve track as well as intensity, structure predictions. Hurricane WRF is the next step towards this goal.
How NOAA Improved Track Forecasts
• HIGH QUALITY OBSERVATIONS (large scale environment surrounding hurricane, e.g. satellite, aircraft)
• MADE BETTER USE OF OBSERVATIONS IN HURRICANE MODELS (advances in data assimilation)
• IMPROVED HURRICANE MODELS (improved numerical techniques and representation of physical processes)
Three components of modeling system:
Advanced Data Platforms for Hurricanes
Environment: (Winds, Moisture, Temperature) – to define steering currents
• Satellite: Advanced Satellite Instruments
(AMSU, GOES, NPOESS etc.)
• In-situ: Aircraft (dropsondes)
Jung and Zapotocny
JCSDAFunded by
NPOESS IPO
Satellite data ~ 10-15% impact
Impact of Removing AMSU, HIRS, GOES Wind, Quikscat Surface Wind Data on Hurricane Track Forecasts in the Atlantic Basin - 2003 (34 cases)
-20.0
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
12 24 36 48 72 96 120
Forecast Hour
% Improvement
NOAMSU
NOHIRS
NOGOESW
NOQuikscat
Impact of Removing AMSU, HIRS, GOES Wind, Quikscat Surface Wind Data on Hurricane Track Forecasts in the East Pacific Basin - 2003 (24 cases)
-60.0
-50.0
-40.0
-30.0
-20.0
-10.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
12 24 36 48 72
Forecast Hour
% Improvement
NOAMSU
NOHIRS
NOGOESW
NOQuikscat
Note: Improved skill at all forecast times in 2002 and 2003
Impact Of Dropsondes On NCEP Global Model Track Forecasts
930
940
950
960
970
980
990
1000
1010
1020
8/9 8/10 8/11 8/12 8/13 8/14 8/15 8/16
Hurricane Charley Minimum Central Pressure9 - 14 August 2004
BEST TRACK
Sat (TAFB)
Sat (SAB)
Sat (AFWA)
Obj T-Num
AC (sfc)
Surface
Pressure (mb)
Date (Month/Day)
Charley deepened From 964 mb to 941 mbin 4 h 35 min nearlandfall – NIGHTMARE!
• ENVIRONMENTAL FORCING
• “good vs. bad” trough interactions
• SST changes (including ocean subsurface)
• CONVECTIVE SCALE PROCESSES
• total rainfall – organization of convection, eyewall vs. Stratiform
• MICROPHYSICS – LIQUID VS. ICE
• INNER CORE REGION
• scale interaction – feedback between vortex dynamics, convective physics and environment
• triggering and adjustment processes – eyewall replacement cycles, eyewall mixing
Science Issues to address Intensity/Structure
• AIR SEA INTERACTION: OCEANIC/ATMOSPHERE BOUNDARY LAYER)
• Air sea fluxes under disturbed conditions (sea spray)
• Turbulence and subgrid scale mixing
• Coupled atm/ocean model; coupled wind-wave model
• UPPER OCEAN PROCESSES
• SST changes – depth of warm layer (accounts for turbulent mixing, horizontal advection) e.g. Gulf Stream and loop currents, warm core eddies, cold wakes
• LAND SURFACE PROCESSES
• PBL fluxes – storm structure -- coupling to hydrologic processes
Science Issues – con’t
To advance TRACK forecasts AND improve INTENSITY, STRUCTURE and RAIN Forecasts:
• Need high quality hurricane core* and environmental observations
• Need advanced data assimilation techniques for environment and hurricane core
• Need advanced modeling system
• Need a “disciplined” approach for transition from research to operations, e.g. JHT, JCSDA
* critical observations for intensity/structure and rain problem
Advanced Observation Platforms for Hurricanes
• Environment (Winds, Moisture, Temp.)
In-situ: G-IV, UAV’s, Driftsondes
Satellite: ADVANCED MICROWAVE INSTRUMENTS
• Hurricane Core (Winds from 12 km to surface)
G-IV, WP-3D airborne Doppler radars
88-D Level II data
• Upper Ocean (SST’s, wave height, mixed layer info)
AXBTs, Altimeter, ARGOS, Current Meter, Buoys
Required Data Assimilation Development
•Advanced Data Assimilation Techniques
Environmental flow – in progress (some success)
Hurricane Interior - substantial R&D necessary*
Ocean data assimilation – new effort (GODAS)
* EMC is developing scale-dependent covariances
Hurricane WRF (HWRF) Prediction System
• Community based next generation hurricane prediction system
• Will replace the GFDL in 2007
• Coupled air-sea-land prediction system
• Advanced data assimilation for hurricane vortex
• Advanced physics for high resolution
• Land surface coupled to hydrology/inundation
• Nested wave prediction
• Coupling to dynamic storm surge (in planning)
GFDL
MM5
02 03 04 05 06 07
Begin Physics Upgrades
Mesoscale Data Assimilation for Hurricane Core
Preliminary Test
HWRF physics
HWRF
T&EHWRF
HWRF Operational
GFDL frozenHWRF T&E
TRANSITIONING TO HURRICANE WRF
Begin R&D
Transition to HWRF
Continue upgrades
Pre-Implementation Strategy for HWRF INCREASE RESOLUTION
UPGRADE GFDL PHYSICS WITH GFS PHYSICS
IMPLEMENT MICROPHYSICS, SFC. PHYSICS
PUT PHYSICS IN WRF FRAMEWORK
MIGRATE ALL PHYSICS TO NMM, e.g. HWRF
CARRY OUT TEST & EVALUATION ON UPGRADED GFDL SYSTEM (GFDL FROZEN ’05-06)
PERFORM EXTENSIVE COMPARISONS BETWEEN GFDL AND HWRF FOR MULTIPLE SEASONS AND STORMS
DEVELOPMENT OF THE HWRF SYSTEM
Movable, nested grid (configuration, domain)
Advancement of physics (wheel of pain)
Initialization (development of DA for hurricane vortex) (LONG TERM EFFORT)
Coupling to HYCOM
Coupling to WAVEWATCH III (+ multi-scale model)
Coupling to LSM
Development/Upgrade of hurricane verification system (PPT, STRUCTURE)
Coupling to storm surge-wave coupled model (planning stage)
HWRF ensembles
“THE PHYSICS WHEEL OF PAIN”
Radiation
Cu SchemeSfc & PBL
Grid Scale Microphysics
1. - Hydrometeor type (phase)
- Cloud optical properties
- Cloud overlap (merging Cu, grid-scale cloudiness)
- Cloud fractions
2. - Precipitation
3. - Sfc energy fluxes
4. - Convection, PBL evolution, precipitation
Compliments of Dr. Jaiyu Zhou (NOAA/OST)
Hurricane-Wave-Ocean-Surge-Inundation Coupled Models
High resolution Coastal, Bay & Estuarine hydrodynamic model
HWRF
Atmosphere/oceanic Boundary Layer
HYCOM3D ocean circulationmodel
WAVEWATCH IIISpectral wave model
NOAH LSM
NOSland and coastal waters
NCEPAtmosphere and Ocean
runoff
fluxes
wave fluxes
wave spectra
windsair temp. SST
currents
elevations currents3D salinities temperatures
other fluxes
surgeinundation
radiativefluxes
HYCOM Expt – Hurricane Isabel MODEL:
– HYCOM Mercator North Atlantic 1/12 degrees (∆x ≈ 7 km).
– 26 vertical coordinates.
– Vertical viscosity and mixing: GISS.
+ FORCING: 6-h NCEP (GFS analysis).
INITIAL CONDITIONS: from near-real time North Atlantic system (NRL & RSMAS) (O.M. Smedstad).
PERIOD: Sept. 3-30, 2003
The Future
Deep ocean model resolution dictated by GFS
model
Higher coastal model resolution dictated by
model economy
Highest model resolution in areas of special interest
Hurricane nests moving with storm(s) like GFDL and HWRF