advanced glaucoma intervention study

70
ADVANCED GLAUCOMA INTERVENTION STUDY SIVATEJA CHALLA

Transcript of advanced glaucoma intervention study

Page 1: advanced glaucoma intervention study

ADVANCED GLAUCOMA INTERVENTION STUDY

SIVATEJA CHALLA

Page 2: advanced glaucoma intervention study

INTRODUCTION• multicentric, prospective, randomized study

• on advanced primary open-angle glaucoma patients (POAG) that have failed initial medical treatment.

• 11 clinical centers in the United States

http://pub.emmes.com/study/agi/index.htm

Page 3: advanced glaucoma intervention study

• 789 eyes of 591 Patients

• April 1988 and November 1992

• Follow-up is projected to continue until march 2001

• Results published accordingly in 14 parts

Page 4: advanced glaucoma intervention study

AGIS 1

Page 5: advanced glaucoma intervention study

OBJECTIVES…•What is the clinical course and what are the outcomes after current therapies?•How effective in preserving vision are two sequences of surgical treatments, one starting with ALT and the other with trabeculectomy? •What are the early and late complication rates? •Can factors be identified that predict outcome with sufficient accuracy to help the ophthalmologist in planning treatment for a patient?

Page 6: advanced glaucoma intervention study

Inclusion and exclusion• Age 35-80 years• POAG• IOP >18 MM hg• Study eye is on MMT• Study eye is treatable with

either ALT or trabeculectomy.• able to cooperate with study

procedures and able to perform tests reliably

• signs consent form

• congenital anomaly of the AC or angle

• secondary glaucoma• kidney dialysis.• Eyes that have undergone

gonioplasty• Eyes with PDR or severe

NPDR.• field loss attributed to a

nonglaucoma condition.• pupil diameter of less than 2

mm

Page 7: advanced glaucoma intervention study

• Visual acuity, gonioscopy, and fundoscopy were each assessed 1X

• visual field testing was 2X, and

• IOP was assessed 3X at baseline.

Page 8: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 9: advanced glaucoma intervention study

• Failure was defined as an eye on MMT that met the study’s eligibility criteria for elevated IOP,Visual field defects, and optic disc rim deterioration

• IOP was measured 1 and 4 weeks after each operation, and visual acuity ,visual fields ,and IOP were assessed 3 and 6 months after enrollment and then biannually thereafter. Data collection closed March 31, 2001.

Page 10: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 11: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 12: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 13: advanced glaucoma intervention study

AGIS 2

Page 14: advanced glaucoma intervention study

SCORING 1 - 20

Page 15: advanced glaucoma intervention study

1.SCORE 1

if 4 or >4 points depressed >12 db add +1

Page 16: advanced glaucoma intervention study

2.each hemifield (23 points)SCORE Cluster with

depressed test sites

1 3-5

2 6-12

3 12-20

4 >20

Page 17: advanced glaucoma intervention study

3.THRESHOLD

SCORE CRITERIA5 If half or more defective locations

in a hemifield are depressed 28 dB or more

4 27-24

3 23-20

2 19-16

1 15-12

Page 18: advanced glaucoma intervention study

4

So can consider 2 points

One should be <12 db

ADD +1

Page 19: advanced glaucoma intervention study

Remember…

The maximum possible score is 20 (2 for the nasal field and 9 for each hemifield).

Page 20: advanced glaucoma intervention study

Reliability rating

Page 21: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 22: advanced glaucoma intervention study

AGIS 3

Page 23: advanced glaucoma intervention study

• examine the differences at baseline in demographic, medical, and ophthalmic characteristics between blacks and whites enrolled

• Age blacks younger to whites• Systemic HTN blacks > whites• VF defects severity blacks > whites• IOP similar in both groups• Blacks were more hyperopic and had relatively fewer

disk rim hemorrhages than whites.• Concluded that POAG occurs at more younger age in

blacks than whites and progression is also fast

Page 24: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 25: advanced glaucoma intervention study

But... DISC HGE

Page 26: advanced glaucoma intervention study

AGIS 4

Page 27: advanced glaucoma intervention study

• Average percent of eyes with decrease of visual field (APDVF)• average percent of eyes with decrease of visual acuity (APDVA), • average percent of eyes with decrease of vision (APDV)

Observed every six monthly till seven years

Page 28: advanced glaucoma intervention study

IOP reduction TAT >> ATT failure of the first intervention ATT>>TAT black patients VF, VA, and DV are less for the ATT

sequence than for the TAT sequence throughout the 7 years.

white patients, VF, VA, DV favors the ATT sequence but only for the first year, after which it favors the TAT sequence through the seventh year

Page 29: advanced glaucoma intervention study

A-T-T T-A-T

Page 30: advanced glaucoma intervention study

AGIS 5

Page 31: advanced glaucoma intervention study

FAILED ALT + TRAB (vs) TRAB (119 EYES) (379 EYES)

Data on bleb encapsualtion collecetd at dx,3m and 6m later

Page 32: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 33: advanced glaucoma intervention study

Stastistically not significant

Page 34: advanced glaucoma intervention study

BUT….Encapsulation of bleb Males >> Females

Page 35: advanced glaucoma intervention study

AGIS 6

Page 36: advanced glaucoma intervention study

TYPE Type 1 cataract

Type 2 cataract

BCVA better than 6/15 Worse than 6/15

Page 37: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 38: advanced glaucoma intervention study

AGIS 7

Page 39: advanced glaucoma intervention study

• 6m f/u for six yrs• Observations :• early average IOP > 17.5 mm Hg had significant

worsening of visual field progression compared with eyes that had an IOP < 14 mm Hg

Page 40: advanced glaucoma intervention study

• IOP < 18 100% TIMES – no change in VF progression• IOP <18 50% times – significant VF deterioration• Eyes with an IOP of > 17.5 mm higher prevalence of

diabetes• Black patients were more likely to have diabetes

compared with white patients.

Page 41: advanced glaucoma intervention study

MOST IMPORTANT…

IOP LESS FIELD PROGRESSION LESS

Page 42: advanced glaucoma intervention study

AGIS 8

Page 43: advanced glaucoma intervention study

???

Page 44: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 45: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 46: advanced glaucoma intervention study

After first trab whether next intervention done or not increases risk by 78%

After trab no post op complications cataract formation reduced by 47 %

After trab post op complications cataract formation increased by 104 %

Page 47: advanced glaucoma intervention study

So………

Page 48: advanced glaucoma intervention study

AGIS 9

Page 49: advanced glaucoma intervention study

A-T-T vs T-A-T

Page 50: advanced glaucoma intervention study

A-T-T

• Blacks were at lower risk than whites of failure of first intervention

T-A-T

• Blacks were at higher risk than whites of failure of the first intervention

In both treatment sequences, the average number of prescribed medications was greater for blacks than whites

Page 51: advanced glaucoma intervention study

• 30% of black patients eyes and 39% of white patients eyes underwent a second intervention in the ATT sequence

• 18% of black patients eyes and 13% of white patients eyes in the TAT sequence.

Page 52: advanced glaucoma intervention study

AGIS 10

Page 53: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 54: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 55: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 56: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 57: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 58: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 59: advanced glaucoma intervention study

AGIS 11

Page 60: advanced glaucoma intervention study

Pre intervention factors(asso c failure rate more)

ALT• younger age • higher IOP

TRAB• younger age • higher IOP • diabetes

Post intervention factors(asso c failure rate more)

• Postoperative complications1. Elevated IOP2. marked inflammation

Page 61: advanced glaucoma intervention study

AGIS 12

Page 62: advanced glaucoma intervention study

sustained decrease of visual field (SDVF)

• Better baseline visual field in both treatment sequences

• Male gender• worse baseline visual acuity

in the ATT sequence• diabetes in the TAT

sequence

sustained decrease of visual acuity (SDVA).

• Better baseline visual acuity• older age• less formal education

RISK FACTORS??

Page 63: advanced glaucoma intervention study

AGIS 13

Page 64: advanced glaucoma intervention study

A-T-T T-A-T

Page 65: advanced glaucoma intervention study

AGIS 14

Page 66: advanced glaucoma intervention study

• To determine the least worsening of a visual field (VF) and the least number of confirming tests needed to identify progression of glaucomatous VF defects.

• Patients with advanced glaucoma, a single confirmatory test 6 months after a VF worsening indicates with at least 72% probability a persistent defect

• Confirmatory tests is increased from 1 to 2, the percentage of eyes that show a persistent defect increases from 72% to 84%

Page 67: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 68: advanced glaucoma intervention study
Page 69: advanced glaucoma intervention study

TAKE HOME MESSAGE• Interaction between race and treatment

sequence• A relationship between IOP and VF stability• Visual function improved after cataract

surgery• More cataracts after trabeculectomy• Race differences in the progression of

advanced glaucoma.

Page 70: advanced glaucoma intervention study

THANK YOU