Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering...

42
1 Advanced Physical Metallurgy Advanced Physical Metallurgy Amorphous Materials Amorphous Materials Eun Eun Soo Soo Park Park Office: 33-316 Telephone: 880-7221 Email: [email protected] Office hours: by an appointment 2009 spring 03.04.2009

Transcript of Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering...

Page 1: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

1

Advanced Physical MetallurgyAdvanced Physical Metallurgy““Amorphous MaterialsAmorphous Materials””

EunEun SooSoo ParkPark

Office: 33-316 Telephone: 880-7221Email: [email protected] hours: by an appointment

2009 spring

03.04.2009

Page 2: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

2

Contents for previous classContents for previous class• AmorphousAmorphous – from the Greek for “without form”

not to materials that have no shape, but rather to materials with no particular structure

• grain boundaries

nearly random = non-periodic

• no grain boundaries

Building block: arranged in orderly, 3-dimensional, periodic array

Page 3: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

3

σ/E=10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1σ2/E=C

Elastomers

Polymers Foams

wood

EngineeringPolymers

EngineeringAlloys

EngineeringCeramics

EngineeringComposites

PorousCeramics

Strength σy (MPa)

Yo

un

gs

mo

du

lus,

E (

GP

a)

< Ashby map >

0.1 1 10 100 1000 100000.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

Amorphous metals

Contents for previous classContents for previous class

Page 4: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

4

Contents for previous classContents for previous class

composite

Metals

Polymers

Ceramics

Amorphousmaterials

Elastomers

Menu of engineering materials

High GFA

High plasticity

higher strengthlower Young’s modulushigh hardnesshigh corrosion resistancegood deformability

Page 5: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

5

Contents for previous classContents for previous class

MicrostructureMicrostructure--Properties RelationshipsProperties Relationships

Microstructure Properties

ProcessingPerformance

DesignDesign

““TailorTailor--made Materials Designmade Materials Design””

Page 6: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

6

Contents for todayContents for today’’s classs class

Introduction to Amorphous Materials

• Glass Transition Temperature

• History of Amorphous Metals

• Glass Formation

• Introduction to Amorphous Materials

• Unique Properties of Amorphous Materials

Page 7: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

7

Introduction_amorphousIntroduction_amorphous materialsmaterials

Amorphous materials a wide diversity of materials can be rendered amorphous indeed almost all materials can.

- metal, ceramic, polymer

ex) amorphous metallic alloy (1960)

- glassy/non-crystalline material

cf) amorphous vs glass- random atomic structure (short range order)

- rapid solidification from liquid state- retain liquid structure

Page 8: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

8

Glass: Glass: undercooledundercooled liquid with high viscosityliquid with high viscosity

Crystal Transition glass Transition

Page 9: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

9

Effect of cooling rate on glass transition temperatureEffect of cooling rate on glass transition temperature

Page 10: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

10

Introduction_amorphousIntroduction_amorphous metalsmetalsDefinition of metallic glass• Noncrystalline metallic solid lacking long-range periodicity of atomicarrangement and showing glass transition.

Bulk metallic glass (BMG)• Metallic glass having a minimum dimension of 1mm which is equivalent to a critical cooling rate of about 103 to 104 K/s.

Glass Formation• Competing process between retention of liquid phase and formation of crystalline phases

a. Liquid phase stability- Stability of the liquid in the equilibrium state (i.e. stable state, Tl)- Stability of the liquid during undercooling (i.e. metastable state, Tg)

b. Resistance to crystallization- Nucleation and growth of the competing crystalline phases

Page 11: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

11

Thermodynamical aspect Small change in free E. (liq. cryst.)

Thermodynamical aspect Thermodynamical aspect Small change in free E. Small change in free E. (liq. (liq. crystcryst.).)

Kinetic aspectLow nucleation and growth rates

Kinetic aspectKinetic aspectLow nucleation and growth ratesLow nucleation and growth rates

Structural aspectHighly packed random structure

Structural aspectStructural aspectHighly packed random structureHighly packed random structure

Glass formationGlass formationGlass formation

Formation of crystalline phasesFormation of crystalline phasesFormation of crystalline phasesRetention of liquid phaseRetention of liquid phaseRetention of liquid phase

• Suppression of nucleation and growth of crystalline phase• Higher degree of dense random packed structure

High glass-forming ability (GFA )

•• SuppressionSuppression of nucleation and growth of crystalline phaseof nucleation and growth of crystalline phase•• HigherHigher degree of dense random packed structuredegree of dense random packed structure

High glassHigh glass--forming ability forming ability ((GFA GFA ) ) max/1 ZorRc∝

Glass formationGlass formation

Page 12: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

12

History: amorphous metalHistory: amorphous metal1934 Vapor deposition

1950 Electro-deposition: Ni-P alloy: hard & corrosion resistant coating

1960 P. Duwez (Caltech)- quenching: phases stable at high temperature

- retain at R.T. / transform into other metastable phases- in solid state

- quenching from liquid state (breakthrough)- eutectic system : α + β- rapid quenching: complete solid solution ?

: Hume Rothery rule

(1959) complete solid solution (but, crystalline)

Formation of solid solution depends on the size difference, electronegativity, crystal structure.

Page 13: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

13

Glass formation: stabilizing the liquid phaseGlass formation: stabilizing the liquid phaseFirst metallic glass (Au80Si20) produced by splat quenching at Caltech by Pol Duwez in 1960.

W. Klement, R.H. Willens, P. Duwez, Nature 1960; 187: 869.

2.0* ≥−

=Δ mixmT

mTmixmT

T

in most of glass forming alloys

by I.W. Donald et al, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 1978;30:77.

- Relative decrease of melting temperature

(where, ,

= mole fraction,

= melting point)

∑= imi

mixm TxT

ixi

mT

Au Si0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

100

300

500

700

900

1100

1300

1500

18.6

363

1064.4

1414

Liquid

Tem

pera

ture

(

°C)

deep eutectic

ΔT* = 0.679

Rapid splat quenchingliquid metal droplet

lasertrigger

metalpiston

metal anvil

t = 20 μm

l = 3 cmw = 2 cm

Tmmix

Tm

Page 14: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

14

Glass formation: stabilizing the liquid phaseGlass formation: stabilizing the liquid phase1969 Ribbon type with long length using melt spinner

: FePC, FeNiPB alloy

Page 15: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

15

Bulk formation of metallic glassBulk formation of metallic glassFirst bulk metallic glass

Pd77.5Cu6Si16.5 (Trg=0.64)

By droplet quenching (CR~800 K/s)

H.S. Chen and D. Turnbull, Acta Metall. 1969; 17: 1021.

SEM image of a collection of glass spheres

Alloy Selection: consideration of Trg

Pd40Ni40P20 (Trg=0.67)

Suppression of heterogeneous nucleation

Largest ingot

- minimum dimension 1 cm and mass of 4 g- Critical cooling rate: ~ 1K/sec.

Drehman, Greer, and Turnbull, 1982.

Page 16: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

16

Recent BMGs with critical size Recent BMGs with critical size ≥≥ 10 mm10 mm

A.L. Greer, E. Ma, MRS Bulletin, 2007; 32: 612.

Zr47Ti8Cu8Ni10Be27 Johnson (Caltech)Vitreloy

Pd60Cu30Ni10P20 Inoue (Tohoku Univ.)

Fe48Cr15Mo14Y2C15B6 Poon (Virginia Univ.)Amorphous steel

Ca65Mg15Zn20 15mm Kim (Yonsei Univ.)Ca60Mg25Ni20 13mmMg65Cu20Ag5Gd10 11mmMg65Cu7.5Ni7.5Zn5Ag5Gd5Y5 14mm

Page 17: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

17

Introduction_AmorphousIntroduction_Amorphous MaterialsMaterials

Unique Properties:- not shared by crystalline solids at all

1) very soft magnetic material- low magnetic loss

- 8 0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 7200.20.4

0.6

0.8

1.01.21.4

1.61.8 Conventional- 0.28 mm thick

Amorphous Fe80B11Si930 um thick

Magnetizing Field (H), A/m

Indu

ctio

n (B

), Te

sla

Transformers

Page 18: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

18

Introduction_AmorphousIntroduction_Amorphous MaterialsMaterialsUnique Properties:

- not shared by crystalline solids at all

2) very hard, high strength

Al alloy Ti alloyAl alloy Ti alloy Stainless BMGStainless BMG((LiquidmetalLiquidmetal®®))

Yield Strength [ 1,000 psi ]

Page 19: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

19

Introduction_AmorphousIntroduction_Amorphous MaterialsMaterialsUnique Properties:

- not shared by crystalline solids at all

2) very hard, high strengthvery brittle

Page 20: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

20

Page 21: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

21

Introduction_AmorphousIntroduction_Amorphous MaterialsMaterialsUnique Properties:

- not shared by crystalline solids at all

3) large elastic strain limit

Elastic Strain Limit[ as % of Original Shape ]

Al alloy Ti alloy Stainless BMGAl alloy Ti alloy Stainless BMG((LiquidmetalLiquidmetal®®))

0.5 % 2.0 %

Strain, ε

2000

1500

1000

500

0

Stre

ss

σ(M

Pa)

Stainless steel

BMG

Stress-Strain Curve

Page 22: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

22Stainless BMG Ti alloy

((LiquidmetalLiquidmetal®®))

Bouncing bearing on Liquid Metals

Page 23: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

23

Introduction_AmorphousIntroduction_Amorphous MaterialsMaterials

Unique Properties:- not shared by crystalline solids at all

4) thermal expansion coeff.: ~ zero

TmeltingTg

Mol

ar V

olum

e, V

Liquid

Glass formation:continuous change

Crystal

Glass

Temperature, T

Crystallization:abrupt change

Near-net shape production

Page 24: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

24

Page 25: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

25

Introduction_AmorphousIntroduction_Amorphous MaterialsMaterialsUnique Properties:

- not shared by crystalline solids at all

5) electrical resistivity

Page 26: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

26

Allotropes of carbon

ex) diamond ex) carbon

Page 27: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

27

Allotropes of carbon Eight allotropes of carbon: diamond, graphite, lonsdaleite, C60, C540, C70, amorphous carbon and a carbon nanotube. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allotropes_of_carbon

Page 28: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

28

Introduction_AmorphousIntroduction_Amorphous MaterialsMaterials

Unique Properties:- not shared by crystalline solids at all

3~4 times higher than crystalline alloy5) electrical resistivity

Crystalline carbon (graphite) Amorphous carbon

Page 29: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

29

Introduction_AmorphousIntroduction_Amorphous MaterialsMaterials

Unique Properties:- not shared by crystalline solids at all

6) corrosion resistance

Crystals Liquids, glasses

• grain boundaries • no grain boundaries

Page 30: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

30

- Grain boundary corrosion

SEM micrograph showing severe grain boundary corrosion

The sensitized structure lends itself to intergranular corrosion as shown below.

(Left) Optical micrograph showing intergranular corrosion from the outer diameter to sub-surface. (Right) SEM micrograph of the same region.

Page 31: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

31

Introduction_AmorphousIntroduction_Amorphous MaterialsMaterials

Unique Properties:- not shared by crystalline solids at all

6) exceptionally high corrosion resistance

Crystals Liquids, glasses

• grain boundaries • no grain boundaries

Page 32: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

32

Introduction_AmorphousIntroduction_Amorphous MaterialsMaterialsUnique Properties:

- not shared by crystalline solids at all

1) very soft magnetic material- low magnetic loss

2) very hard, high strengthvery brittle

4) thermal expansion coeff.: ~ zero

3) large elastic strain limit

5) electrical resistivity

3~4 times higher than crystalline alloy

6) exceptionally high corrosion resistance

Page 33: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

33

Page 34: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

34

Alloying: atoms mixed on a latticeSolid Solutions and Ordered Compounds

Two Possibilities for Solid Solutions: B atoms in A atoms

Substitutional Interstitials‘new element replaces host atoms’ ‘new element goes in holes’

Can we roughly estimate what atoms will form solid solutions?

e.g. semiconductor devices: doped-Si C in Fe

e.g. Ni in Cu, steels

Page 35: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

35

Ordered Substitutional and Interstititials Compounds

Substitutional Interstitialelement replaces host atoms element goes into holes in an orderly arrangement in an orderly arrangement

e.g., Ni3Al (hi-T yield strength), Al3(Li,Zr) (strengthening)

e.g., small impurities, claysionic crystals, ceramics.

Alloying: atoms mixed on a latticeSolid Solutions and Ordered Compounds

Page 36: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

368

• Solid solution of B in A plus particles of a newphase (usually for a larger amount of B)

Second phase particle--different composition--often different structure.

Particles of New Phase in Solid-Solution Alloys

Solid Solution phase B atoms in A

Page 37: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

37

Hume-Rothery Rules for Alloys (atoms mixing on a lattice)

Will mixing 2 (or more) different types of atoms lead to a solid-solution phase?

Empirical observations have identified 4 major contributors through :

+1 +2

Atomic Size Factor , Crystal Structure, Electronegativity, Valences

Page 38: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

38

Hume-Rothery Rules for MixingEmpirical rules for substitutional solid-solution formation were identified from experiment that are not exact, but give an expectation of formation. Briefly,

1) Atomic Size Factor The 15% RuleIf "size difference" of elements are greater than ±15%, the lattice distortions (i.e. local lattice strain) are too big and solid-solution will not be favored.

DR%= < ±15% will not disallow formation.

2) Crystal Structure Like elemental crystal structures are betterFor appreciable solubility, the crystal structure for metals must be the same.

3) Electronegativity DE ~ 0 favors solid-solution.The more electropositive one element and the more electronegative the other, then "intermetallic compounds" (order alloys) are more likely.

4) Valences Higher in lower alright. Lower in higher, it’s a fight.A metal will dissolve another metal of higher valency more than one of lower valency.

rsolute − rsolventrsolvent

x100%

Page 39: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

39

Is solid-solution favorable, or not?

• Cu-Ni AlloysRule 1: rCu = 0.128 nm and rNi= 0.125 nm.

DR%= = 2.3% favorable √

Rule 2: Ni and Cu have the FCC crystal structure. favorable √

Rule 3: ECu = 1.90 and ENi= 1.80. Thus, DE%= -5.2% favorable √

Rule 4: Valency of Ni and Cu are both +2. favorable √

Expect Ni and Cu forms S.S. over wide composition range.

At high T, it does (helpful processing info), but actually phaseseparates at low T due to energetics (quantum mechanics).

Hume-Rothery Empirical Rules In Action

rsolute − rsolvent

rsolvent

x100%

Page 40: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

40

Is solid-solution favorable, or not?

• Cu-Ag AlloysRule 1: rCu = 0.128 nm and rAg= 0.144 nm.

DR%= = 9.4% favorable √

Rule 2: Ag and Cu have the FCC crystal structure. favorable √

Rule 3: ECu = 1.90 and ENi= 1.80. Thus, DE%= -5.2% favorable √

Rule 4: Valency of Cu is +2 and Ag is +1. NOT favorable

Expect Ag and Cu have limited solubility.

In fact, the Cu-Ag phase diagram (T vs. c) shows that a solubility of only 18% Ag can be achieved at high T in the Cu-rich alloys.

Hume-Rothery Empirical Rules In Action

rsolute − rsolvent

rsolvent

x100%

Page 41: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

41

Cu-Ag Alloys Cu-Ni Alloys

Page 42: Advanced Characterization of Materials · 2018. 1. 30. · Alloys Engineering Ceramics Engineering Composites Porous Ceramics Strength σ y (MPa) Youngs modulus, E (GPa) < Ashby

42

Ex) Application of amorphous alloy systems

1) Magnetic amorphous alloy (ribbon)- transition metal-metalloid (TM-M) alloys rapid quenching- RE-TM alloys sputtering- TM-Zr(Hf) alloys rapid quenching

role of metalloid element (ex. B) : lower melting point

Introduction_AmorphousIntroduction_Amorphous MaterialsMaterials

2) Amorphous alloy as brazing filler (ribbon)ex) Ni-based amorphous alloy

- for almost all metal without binder