Advance Suite Update - Australian Catholic University_B... · Advance Suite Update Vice President,...
Transcript of Advance Suite Update - Australian Catholic University_B... · Advance Suite Update Vice President,...
Bill Kavan
Advance Suite Update Vice President, Strategy & Product Management
This documentation is proprietary information of SunGard Higher Education and is not to be copied, reproduced, lent or disposed of, nor used for any purpose other than that for which it is specifically provided without the written permission of SunGard Higher Education.
Agenda Slide Introductions
UpdatesUpdates
Looking Forward
Q & A
2
Introductions
Bill KavanBill KavanVice President, ProductManagement & Strategy
3
Updates
Advance Suite Community: New Clients
New Advance Web Client Tulane University Tulane University
New SmartCall ClientsNew SmartCall Clients Carleton University DePaul University Eastern Illinois University Tulane University
Welcome!Welcome!5
Advance Suite Community: New LEAPs
Carleton College D t th C ll Dartmouth College
Emory University New York University New York University London School of Economics Queen's UniversityQueen s University University of Delaware University of Kansas Alumni Association and Kansas University y y
Endowment Association University of Missouri System Administration University of San Diego Vanderbilt University
6
Washington State University Foundation
Recent Advance Web Go Lives
Case Western ReserveG W hi t U i it George Washington University
Ohio University University of California Berkeley University of California, Berkeley University of Maryland, Baltimore Western Kentucky UniversityWestern Kentucky University University of Maine, Fort Kent
C !Congratulations!C g7
Advance User Group Executive Committee Karen Greene, Arizona State University Foundation Brian Lawver, California State University, Long Beach Carla Thomas, Carleton College Todd Rheinfrank, Carnegie Mellon University Ron Eisenstein, DePaul University Ginger Kane, Emory University Becky Wile, Franklin & Marshall College Scott Jenks, Georgia Tech FoundationScott Jenks, Georgia Tech Foundation Julie Broad, Harvard University Tom Moore, Pennsylvania State University Jeff Beachy Skidmore College Jeff Beachy, Skidmore College Steve Swain, Syracuse University Karen Latora, University of California, Davis Suzanne Baker University of Chicago Suzanne Baker, University of Chicago John Vega, University of Chicago Kathleen DesJardins, University of Vermont
D M i Vi i i P l t h i I tit t d St t U i it
8
Dan Marion, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Recent Releases
March 2010 Advance Web 9 5 0 0 Advance Web 9.5.0.0 Advance Windows 9.5.0.0
April 2010 Advancement Performance 1.0
May 2010Ad W b 9 4 0 1 Advance Web 9.4.0.1
June 2010 June 2010 Advance Web 9.5.0.1
9
SunGard Higher Education Update
Business
Advancement Intelligence Common Components
Finance & HRInternational Student Finance & HR
Retention & St d t
Services
Recruiting & Admissions
Student Success IT Services
Teaching, Learning
& Research10
& Research
Advancement Product Management
AdvancementBill KBill Kavan
Advance Suite
Banner Advancement
PowerCAMPUS Advancement
Tom Scarlett Carla Norris Carla Norris
11
Other Advance Suite Leadership
Cheryl BoeckmanVP S l
Joe WattersPrincipal Technical
Rick MatinaVP SoftwareVP Sales Principal Technical
ArchitectVP Software Development
Scott LoveVP Customer
Support
Tom ConnollyVP Professional
Services
Valerie KennonMarketing Director
pp Services
12
The Commons
An online community where SunGard Higher Education
customers and employees can share experiences, ask questions, s a e e pe e ces, as quest o s,
find answers, and connect to a collaborative and informedcollaborative and informed
network.
13
Customer Commons
C tCustomer Commonss
14
Community Source Initiative (CSI)
Existing Modifications to BaselineCSI processes focused on submitting, reviewing and delivering modifications already developed by customers into the baseline product. Once in baseline, SunGard is responsible for all maintenance and enhancement work completed on the software.p
Customer Development with a Focus for BaselineCustomers that wish to develop new modifications in house, but with the ultimate goal of delivery and adoption into baseline. The CSI processes that support this effort are in process. Customers could present their proposed modifications to a review committee for initial feedback and approval. Upon periodic review of the project and adherence to baseline standards, modifications will easily migrate to baseline
Code Sharing in a Code RepositoryCSI processes that support a common shared code repository Customers that wish to share custom
baseline.
CSI processes that support a common shared code repository. Customers that wish to share custom code with others, may submit code to a shared location. Customers share code “as is”, without regard to warranty or guarantee. (This effort is currently in development)
15
Community Source Governance
Board Nominating
Board of Directors
Nominating Committee
Nominating Committee
Community Members
TechnicalFunctional Technical Review
Committee
Functional Review
Committee Code Repository
WG
16
Development Update - Continuous Integration Continuous build is now fully operational
Continuous integration tool is Hudson Auto build is invoked when the developer checks in modified
software into the source management repository
Smoke tests are now fully automated and operational Set of minimal acceptance tests executed against a new buildSet of minimal acceptance tests executed against a new build,
validating the viability of that build Automation tool used is HP’s QTP tool (Quick Test Professional
10)v10)
17
Development Update - Continuous Integration
Regression tests are now 90% automated Automation tool is QTPAutomation tool is QTP
Benefits Continuous build frees up developers for more coding and unit
testingS k t t l t d l i di t l f th i di Smoke tests alerts developers immediately of their coding errors
Automated regression tests frees up testers for more testing –ad-hoc and discovery testing - on new features y g
18
Looking Forward
Pair Wise Exercise – Fall 2009
20
Advance Suite Key Objectives 2011 - 2013
Open Digital Campus EvolutionU E i User Experience
Biographic & Demographic Re-Architecture SunGard Higher Education Mobile Platform SunGard Higher Education Mobile Platform iModules Integration Client Requested EnhancementsClient Requested Enhancements Defect Resolutions Web AlignmentWeb Alignment Advancement Performance Management Community Sourcey Client Engagement
21
Advance Suite Roadmap: DeliveredRelease Date Component Release Key FeaturesApril 2009 Advance Web 9.3.1.0 Integration with EMC ApplicationXtender Web Access and
Quick Scan Pro
June 2009 Advance Web 9.3.0.1 Integration with iModules Encompass Phase I
June 2009 SmartCall 9.6.0.0 VOIP Support, Hi-Phone Dialer Support, Email Acknowledgements, Banner 8.x Integration, QAS Integration, Client Requested Enhancements, Defect Resolutions
October 2009 Advance Web 9.4.0.0 Securing Patient Data, Mass Update (Prospect), Affiliation Filtering, New UX, Race/Ethnicity, PCI Compliance, Client Requested Enhancements, Banner 8.x Integration, Event Enhancements, LDAP Active Directory Support, Oracle 11G, Blackberry 8900 IE8 Defect ResolutionsBlackberry 8900, IE8, Defect Resolutions
October 2009 Advance Windows 9.4.0.0 Race/Ethnicity, PCI Compliance, Client Requested Enhancements, Oracle 11G, PowerBuilder 11.5, Defect Resolutions
October 2009 Advance Web 4 1 0 0 PCI Compliance Name Only Event Registration CrystalOctober 2009 Advance Web Community
4.1.0.0 PCI Compliance, Name Only Event Registration, Crystal Reports 2008 Support, LDAP Active Directory Support, Oracle 11G, Defect Resolutions
March 2010 Advance Web 9.5.0.0 Bio/Demo Phase I, Client Requested Enhancements, Web Alignment, iModules Phase II, Defect Resolutions.
March 2010 Advance Windows 9.5.0.0 Bio/Demo Phase I, Client Requested Enhancements, Defect Resolutions.
April 2010 Advancement Performance
1.0.0.0 Advancement Data Warehouse (component of EDW) and Advancement Analytics, focused on “Manage the Prospect Pi li ” d “A l F d i i P f ”
22
Pipeline” and “Analyze Fundraising Performance.”
Advance Suite Roadmap: Delivered & PlannedRelease Date Component Release Key FeaturesMay 2010 Advance Web 9.4.0.1 Defect Resolutions.
June 2010 Advance Web 9 5 0 1 Defect ResolutionsJune 2010 Advance Web 9.5.0.1 Defect Resolutions.
August 2010 Advance Web 9.4.1.0 University of Maine Specific Release for Multi-Location Support .
September 2010 Advance Web 9.5.1.0 64 BIT Support, Web Alignment, Defect Resolutions.
September 2010 Advance Windows 9.5.1.0 Defect Resolutions, Client Requested Enhancements.
September 2010 Advance Web 9.4.2.0 iModules Bio Integration Refinements
Q4 2010 Advance Web 9.6.0.0 Web Alignment, Defect Resolutions, Multi-Location Support g , , pp(General), Bio/Demo Phase II.
Q4 2010 Advance Windows 9.6.0.0 Defect Resolutions, Bio/Demo Phase II, Client Requested Enhancements.
Q4 2010 Advance Web 9.4.2.0 Bio/Demo CompatibilityCommunity
p y
Q1 2011 SmartCall TBD Windows 7, Bio/Demo Compatibility,Defect Resolutions, Client Requested Enhancements.
Q2 2011 Advance Web TBD Web Alignment, Defect Resolutions, Client Requested
This document contains forward–looking statements based on current expectations, forecasts and assumptions of SunGard Higher Education that involve risks andt i ti F d l ki t t t bj t t i k d t i ti i t d ith S G d Hi h Ed ti ' b i th t ld t l lt
g , , qEnhancements, Architecture Refinements, iModules Phase III.
Q2 2011 Advance Windows TBD Defect Resolutions, Client Requested Enhancements.
23
uncertainties. Forward looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties associated with SunGard Higher Education 's business that could cause actual resultsto vary materially from those stated or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Advance Suite Roadmap: Planned
Release Date Component Release Key FeaturesRelease Date Component Release Key FeaturesQ2 2011 Advancement
PerformanceTBD Prioritized features to be determined in partnership with the
partner development group.
Q3 2011 Advance Web TBD Web Alignment, Defect Resolutions, Client Requested Enhancements, Bio/Demo Phase III.
Q3 2011 Advance Widows TBD Defect Resolutions, Client Requested Enhancements, Bio/Demo Phase III.
Q4 2011 Advance Web TBD Web Alignment, Defect Resolutions, Client Requested Enhancements, Architecture Refinements, Mobile, iModules Phase IV.
Q4 2011 Advance Windows TBD Defect Resolutions, Client Requested Enhancements.
This document contains forward–looking statements based on current expectations, forecasts and assumptions of SunGard Higher Education that involve risks andt i ti F d l ki t t t bj t t i k d t i ti i t d ith S G d Hi h Ed ti ' b i th t ld t l lt
24
uncertainties. Forward looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties associated with SunGard Higher Education 's business that could cause actual resultsto vary materially from those stated or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Advance Transformation - Current
25
Advance Transformation - Concept
26
Mobile Life of Development Officers
Mobile applications for: Contact Reports Contact Reports Prospect and Donor Profiles Donor Historyy Fundraising status
Applications for multiple devices iPhone, iPad, Android, Blackberry, Windows Mobile
Mobile SDK for client developed applications
27
Contact Reports - Concept
28
Prospect and Donor Profile - Concept
29
Giving History - Concept
30
Biographic and Demographic Re-Architecture
Evolution project commenced in late 2009Cli t F G i l d i i iti ti i t Client Focus Group involved in prioritization, requirements gathering, and prototype review
Project MilestonesProject Milestones Phase I Delivered March 2010
Email Phase II Expected Q4 2010
Phone AddressAddress E-Contact
Phase III Expected 2011 Relationships Householding International
31
International
Biographic and Demographic Re-Architecture Focus GroupFocus Group
Engaging customers to provide direct
California State University, Long Beach
feedback into product developmenty g
Carnegie Mellon University Columbia University Emory University Michigan State University Pennsylvania State University Pennsylvania State University Queens University Rutgers University Foundation Skidmore College University of Arkansas
U i it f Mi i
32
University of Missouri
Email Enhancements
33
iModules Partnership: Value to Clientsp Advancement-focused online engagement
Feature-rich online communication tools
Community building capabilities
Operational efficiencies in data collection and
Coordinated partner activities
34
iModules Focus Group
Engaging customers to provide direct
• Bard College • Rose Hulman Institute of Technology
feedback into product development
• Bryant University • Case Western Reserve University• Colorado College
• Rutgers University Foundation• Skidmore College• Spelman Collegeg
• Franklin & Marshall College• Ithaca College• Lehigh University
p g• University of California, Davis• University of California, Santa Cruz• University of Indianapolis• Lehigh University
• McMaster University• New York University
N th C li St t U i it
• University of Indianapolis• University of North Carolina – Charlotte• University of Notre Dame
U i it f Mi i C l bi• North Carolina State University• Oakland University• Occidental College
• University of Missouri, Columbia• University of Scranton• Wilkes University
35
• Penn State University
Initial iModules Integration Goals
Common Advancement Product Integration Banner Advancement Banner Advancement Advance Web
Biographic Data InterchangeBiographic Data Interchange Provide means of supplying updated data from either Banner or
Advance to the iModules hosted solution Provide means of importing updated data from iModules into either
Banner Advancement or Advance Web Giving History Web ServiceGiving History Web Service Provide common web service interface to iModules from both
Banner and Advance Availability
Beginning with Advance Web 9.3B i i ith B Ad t 8 2
36
Beginning with Banner Advancement 8.2
Advance Web iModules Integration Feature Matrix
Feature AdvanceFeature Advance Version
iModules Service 9.5
xsequence id’s utilized 9.5
Changed data is only pushed/pulled 9.5
Cli b d/R ti l f Ad W b 9 5Clipboard/Reporting no longer necessary for Advance Web Mediator operation
9.5
Time values editable for push/pull operations 9.5
System Option 340 – Prevent simultaneous Web Mediator/iModules Service operation
9.5
Giving History Web Service 9 3 0 1 – 9 5Giving History Web Service 9.3.0.1 9.5
Basic Push/Pull operations utilizing all data 9.3.0.1 – 9.4
37
Advance Web iModules Scheduler
38
iModules Giving History Web Service
39
Giving History Web Service
40
2011 iModules Integration Projects
Focus Group, SunGard Higher Education, and iModules PrioritiesiModules Priorities Gift Integration
Q2 2011 Events Integration
Q4 2011 Membership IntegrationMembership Integration
Q4 2011
Detailed planning and resource allocation in process
I iti l U St i h b d l d Initial User Stories have been developed
41
Bringing Value to All Levels of the Institution
EXECUTIVESEXECUTIVESScorecards for
Performance ManagementPerformanceData
MANAGEMENTDashboards, Reports and
Analytics to Monitor ProgressTrend,
KNOWLEDGE WORKERSAd-hoc analysis tools to identify
,SummaryData
y yand understand trends
STAFFDetailedProduction reports and
ad-hoc access fordaily operations
Data
42
Advancement Performance Management
Performance Reporting DiscoveryReporting
Data Warehouse
Advance Banner Adv Other DataSmartCall
43
Advancement Performance Management
Performance ReportingE d U R ti
DiscoveryAd H A l iEnd-User Reporting
Operational Dashboards Strategic Scorecards
Ad-Hoc AnalysisAnalytical Dashboards
Data Visualization
D t W h
Prebuilt Reports and ToolsAd-hoc Analysis
In-Memory Data ManagementPredictive Analytics
Data WarehouseShared Metrics DefinitionsSummary and Detail Datay
Daily Updates and Point-in-time Snapshots
Advance Banner Adv Other DataSmartCall
44
Data Warehouse: Establish a Culture of Performance
Achieve an institution-wide version of the truth Provides point-in-time historical data snapshots allowing you toProvides point in time, historical data snapshots allowing you to
compare performance over time Provide a daily, up-to-date status on advancement initiatives
Provide a foundation for a comprehensive view of performance Understand organizational performance today and over time Understand organizational performance today and over time
using a shared view of the data Collaborate using information more effectively to achieve your
Get your data working for you, t i t
vision and goals
not against you Provide quick and easy
access to information Data Warehouse
45
Reports Pre-packaged trend and summary reports with drill-through to
detail reports Designed with development partners Flexibility to customize to institutional requirements
Configurable Parameter Mapsg p Report Studio report authoring tool Merging capability for managing customizations during upgrades
Professionally designed Professionally-designed content in printable formats
Prompt pages for on-demand, flexible reporting for all levels
Performance Reporting
flexible reporting for all levels Bursting, scheduling, and
event based deployment
Data Warehouse
Ad Hoc Reporting
46
Report Examples
47
Scorecards: Strategy-based Performance
Connect strategy to individuals through role-based, configurable views of metrics, planning targets, thresholdsconfigurable views of metrics, planning targets, thresholds and history
Monitor key performance indicators (KPIs) to track progress towards goals
Drill-down to reports and analytics
Performance Reporting
Data Warehouse
48
Performance Management Solution: Scorecards
49
Performance Management Solution: Scorecards
50
Discovery: “See” the Data and “Discover the Stories”
Analyze data from multiple sources and perspectives and d t d l ti hi i klunderstand relationships quickly
Detect the expected and discover the unexpected*
Use insight to help identify actionable next
Provide timely, defensible, and understandable insight*
g p ysteps
Use Predictive Analytics to identify causal factors and predict (or score) future behavior
* Source: National Visualization and Analytics Center (NVAC™) http://nvac pnl gov/about stm
Discovery
Source: National Visualization and Analytics Center (NVAC™), http://nvac.pnl.gov/about.stm
Data Warehouse
51
Discovery: Examples
Campaign Trend Anal sisProspect Identification Campaign Trend AnalysisProspect IdentificationList Selection
(right click to export)
Staff Performance Management -- Prospect MovesProspect Management
52
Annual Fund Appeals PortfolioAd Hoc Reporting Alumni Relations – Clubs & Events
Dashboards: Extend Value to All Levels of the Organization
Dashboards are not one size fits all! Strategic: Executives ManagersStrategic: Executives, Managers Tactical: Managers, Analysts Operational: Supervisors, Specialists
Value to the Institution Fits role of target user Meets performance monitoring needs Provides easy navigation & analysis Provides easy navigation & analysis Monitor overall performance at-a-glance Navigate and filter data to analyze trendsg y Provide support for collaborative, data-driven decision making
53
Advancement Performance Mgt. Dashboard Portfolio
Performance Reporting DiscoveryApplication Monitoring Management Analysis List ReductionPurpose Convey information Improve Explore data Slice and dice listsPurpose Convey information
at a glanceImprove coordination and collaboration
Explore data, analyze outliers & exception conditions
Slice and dice lists
Components • Multi-paned screens
• Annotations• Thread
• Analytics (i.e. dimensional
• In-memory data managementscreens
w/visual elements
• Symbols, alerts• Charts tables
• Thread discussions
• Meetings• Strategy
maps
dimensional, time series, segmentation)
• Forecasting, modeling and
management• Visual Discovery™• Visual query and
Reporting• Charts, tables
with conditional formatting
• Drill-down to detail reports
maps• Objectives• Workflows
modeling, and predictive statistics
• In-memory data managementdetail reports
• Alertsmanagement
• Visual analysis and Reporting
Dashboard Type
• Operational, Tactical
• Strategic • Strategic, Tactical or
• TacticalType Tactical Tactical or
AnalyticalSunGard HE Solutions
• Performance Reporting
• Performance Reporting
• Discovery • Discovery
54
Dashboard Example
55
Advancement Performance v. 1.0
Released: April 2010 Two Primary Sets of Business QuestionsTwo Primary Sets of Business Questions
Manage Prospect Pipeline Analyze Fundraising Performance
Development Partner Group Development Partner Group Ithaca College (Advance) University of Notre Dame (Advance)
U i i f Vi i i (Ad ) University of Virginia (Advance) Villanova University (Banner) Wright State University (Banner)
Quick Implementations: 60-90 Days Focus on “Quick Time to Value” Assumes Advance or Banner Advancement are Already y
Live
56
Manage Prospect Pipeline ContentManage Prospect Pipeline Content
Summary and Detail Reports (10) Prospect Profile
Key Prospect Pipeline Questions What is the breakdown of my pipeline by stage/
rating? Prospect Profile Prospect Stage Summary Prospects by Interest & Target Amount Range Proposal Summary by Primary Staff Assignment
O
g What is the number of assigned prospects for
campaign initiatives? By unit By development staff Proposal Overview
Contact Report Aging by Primary Assignment and Type Prospect Pool Summary Dashboard Performance Charts (9)
By development staff What is the breakdown of my prospects?
By type (donor category) By unit/department ( )
Prospects by Interest & Latest Stage Chart Prospect Latest Contact Aging Chart Prospects by Latest Stage Chart Proposals by Latest Stage & Target Amount Chart
By date of assignment For rated campaign prospects, what is current
status in cultivation cycle? What proposals have been funded, declined, or
Proposals by Latest Stage & Target Amount Chart Proposals by Latest Stage Chart Proposals by Latest Stage/Ask Amount Chart Prospects by Stage/Rating Chart
inactivated for each college/school, department? What are the total dollars pending for proposals for
each initiative? What is progress on rated campaign prospects
Prospect Pipeline Composition Chart Prospect Proposals by State ChartCubes Manage Current Prospect Pipeline Cube
compared to those needed to support campaign goals at each level?
What are a Development officer’s portfolio of prospects?
57
Manage Current Prospect Pipeline Cube
Analyze Fundraising Performance ContentFundraising Analysis Content
Summary and Detail Reports (15) Campaign Pyramid Summary
Key Fundraising Analysis Questions What is current status to campaign goal by
needs (funds, allocations)? Campaign Pyramid Summary Campaign Summary by Entity Type and
Designation Donor Giving History
needs (funds, allocations)? Who are the top campaign supporters by
commitment amount? What is progress on rated campaign prospects
d t th d d t t Gift Officer Proposal Summary Campaign Donors by Entity Type - Summary Campaign Gift Detail
Campaign Donor List
compared to those needed to support campaign pyramid?
What is the current campaign status by source /donors?
Campaign Donor List Campaign Donors by State Dashboard Performance Charts (6) Top 10 Campaign Donor List Chart
By Institutional/individual giving by affiliations, cohorts By giving groups - Annual Giving, Leadership
Gifts, Principal Gifts, Planned Giving Top 10 Campaign Donor List Chart Recent Campaign Gifts Chart Campaign Progress Toward Overall Goal Chart Campaign Donors by Entity Type Chart
What is the % participation in the campaign by group? Faculty/Staff? Alumni? Friends?
What are most recent campaign gifts, and to what areas, and by whom?
Campaign Donors by State Chart Campaign Progress Toward Annual Goals ChartCubes Analyze Fundraising Performance Cube
, y What are the trends in campaign progress in
the past month, over the past year, and over the duration of the campaign?
58
Analyze Fundraising Performance Cube
Community Involvement Opportunities User Group Executive SIGs Focus Groups
Bio Re-Architecture Technical Architecture Technical Architecture iModules Advancement Performance Mobile
Commons Moderator Contributor
Comm nit So rce Community Source Functional and Technical Review Committees Contributor
59
Contributor
Community Involvement Opportunities
• Advancement Conference Committee• Karen Latora, Chair• Advancement Track Planning• Social and Networking Event Organization
• Session Presenter• Session Presenter• Commons Discussion Host• Roundtable Moderator
60
Questions & Answers
61
Thank You!
Bill [email protected]
http://blogs.sungard.com/he_advancement/602-276-4476
SunGard, the SunGard logo, the Open Digital Campus, Banner, Luminis, and PowerCAMPUS are trademarks or registered trademarks of SunGard Data Systems Inc. or its subsidiaries in the U.S. and other countries. © 2009 SunGard. All rights reserved.
© 2010 SunGard. All rights reserved.
This documentation is proprietary information of SunGard Higher Education and is not to be copied, reproduced, lent or disposed of, nor used for any purpose other than that for which it is specifically provided without the written permission of SunGard Higher Education.
62