ADDISON @ ORLANDO GATEWAY APARTMENTS · 2019. 3. 12. · 2016 - Current owners acquired the...

Property Location Generally located west of North Frontage Rd. and east of Shadowridge Dr. , (10.75 acres, District 1).

Applicant’s Request Master Plan request for a new apartment complex, totaling 8 buildings and 323 units.

S U M M A R Y

Location Map Subject Site

Owner

JBL Gateway

Applicant

Jennifer Stickler

Project Planner

Chris DeLoatche

March 19, 2019 Staf f Report to the Munic ipal P lanning Board

ADDISON @ ORLANDO GATEWAY APARTMENTS

C AS E # M P L 2 0 1 9 - 1 0 0 0 0 I t e m # 6

Staff’s Recommendation Approval of the request subject to the condi-tions in the staff report.

Public Comment Courtesy notices were mailed to property owners within 300 ft. of the subject property the week of March 5, 2019. As of the pub-lished date of this report, staff has not re-ceived any comments from the public con-cerning this request.

Updated: March 11, 2019

N

SH

AD

OW

RID

GE

D

R

Future Land Use Map

Zoning Map

AC-3/AN

SH

AD

OW

RID

GE

D

R

N

AC

-3/A

N/

SH

AD

OW

RID

GE

D

R

N

Project Analys is Project Description The applicant is seeking to construct a 323 unit apartment complex dispersed among mostly 8 buildings, mostly 4 stories in height. The subject property is located just north of the Orlando International Airport in the Airport North neighborhood. The +10.75 acre site is vacant and has never been developed on. Previous Actions: 1985 - Property was annexed into the City of Orlando 2007 - 120-acre Orlando Gateway Master Plan was approved (MPL2017-00016); applicant submitted for 348-unit apartment complex but subsequently withdrew in 2008 (MPL2017-00024) 2007 - Future Land Use and changed to Urban Activity Center and AC-2/AN respectively (GMP2007-00024 and ZON2007-00023); property platted as part of Orlando Gateway Lot 1 2011 - Master Plan request was approved for a 370-unit apartment complex however the project was never built (MPL2011-00022) 2016 - Current owners acquired the property. Project Context The subject site is generally located west of North Frontage Rd. and east of Shadowridge Dr. The property is split zoned with +9.85 acres zoned AC-2/AN and +0.90 acres zoned AC-3/AN with a corresponding Future Land Use (FLU) desig-nation of Urban Activity Center (UR-AC) and Metropolitan Activity Center (MET-AC), respectively. The immediate area has hotels, restaurants, and retail shopping. Additional details on surrounding properties can be found in Table 1 below:

Master Plan Criteria The Municipal Planning Board and City Council shall consider the following factors in their review of Master Plan

Applications (Land Development Code (LDC) Section 65.335): 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of the use and all other requirements of the LDC. 2. Growth Management Plan (GMP). The consistency of the proposal with all applicable policies of the City's adopted

GMP. 3. Use and District Requirements. The proposal must conform to the requirements of the zoning district(s) in which it is

located and, where applicable, to the requirements of Chapter 58 for the particular use or activity under considera-tion.

4. Performance and Design Regulations. The proposal must conform to all applicable performance and design regula-tions of LDC Chapters 58, 60, 61, and 62.

5. Public Facilities and Services. Necessary public facilities (both on- and off-site), such as transportation, sanitation, water, sewer, drainage, emergency services, education, recreation, etc. will be adequate to serve the proposed use.

Conformance with the GMP As mentioned above the site has a split zoning of AC-2/AN and AC-3/AN with a corresponding FLU of Urban Activity Center (UR-AC) and Metropolitan Activity Center (MET-AC). The UR-AC portion of the property has a minimum density of 30 dwelling units (du) to the acre and a maximum density of 100 du/acre. The MET-AC portion of the property has a minimum density of 30 du/acre and a maximum density of 200 du/acre. The applicant is proposing 30.5 du/acre for the UR-AC portion of the property (+9.85 acres) and 28.5 du/acre for the MET-AC portion of the property (+0.9 acres). As this is one development site and the majority of the property (92% of the total acreage) meets the minimum required density, the site will be considered to meet the minimum density required.

Table 1—Project Context

Future Land Use Zoning Surrounding Uses

North MET-AC AC-3/AN Hotel

East MET-AC AC-3/AN/SP Hotels & Restaurants

South MET-AC AC-3/AN Vacant

West UR-AC & CONSERV AC-2/AN & C/AN Vacant

Conformance with the LDC The proposed site has a split zoning of AC-2/AN and AC-3/AN. The AC-2 Urban Activity Center District (AC-2) is intend-ed to provide for concentrated areas of residential, commercial, office, industrial, recreational and cultural facilities serv-ing major sub-regions of the Orlando urban area, and at intensities significantly higher than in surrounding neighbor-hoods. Although some Urban Activity Centers may be composed of a single type of use, a mixture of land uses is specifi-cally encouraged. These activity centers are intended for locations where arterials and four lane collectors and mass transit service are available, providing access between metropolitan sub-regions and complementing the primary arterial transportation system. AC-3 Metropolitan Activity Center District (AC-3) district is intended to provide for large concentrated areas of residential, commercial, office, industrial, recreational and cultural facilities at a scale which serves the entire metropolitan area, and at the highest intensities to be found anywhere outside of Downtown Orlando. A mixture of land uses is specifically in-tended—Metropolitan Activity Centers composed of a single type of use shall be strongly discouraged. These activity centers are intended for locations where arterials and four lane collectors and mass transit service are available, provid-ing access to other metropolitan areas. The purpose of the Aircraft Noise (AN) Overlay District is to protect the health, safety, and welfare of persons and prop-erty in the vicinity of the OIA and OEA. Aircraft noise may be considered annoying, objectionable, or unhealthy to resi-dents in the community surrounding the airports. The AN Overlay district is intended to reduce noise and safety hazards associated with aircraft operations, to preserve the operational stability of the airports, and assist in the implementation of policies and recommendations found in the City's Growth Management Plan and in appropriate FAA sponsored Part 150 Studies. Development Standards The site will be reviewed for both of the zoning districts that exist on the property (AC-2/AN and AC-3/AN). The site has double frontage on both North Frontage Rd. and Shadowridge Dr. with no true “rear yard”. The side setbacks will be de-fined as the north and south property lines. The north property line will be required to have a Bufferyard ‘A’ which would require a hedge and 80% tree coverage along the property line, in addition to what the applicant has proposed. In Sep-tember of 2018, the City adopted new development standards for multi-family developments above 8 units which will be further discussed in the Urban Design and Transportation sections of this report. Based on Tables 2 and 3 below, the applicant meets the standards of the zoning district.

Table 2—Development Standards

Zoning Acres Use Sq. Ft./

dwelling units

Density (dwelling units per

acre) Building Height

ISR (impervious surface

ratio)

Min./Max. Proposed Max. Proposed Max. Proposed

AC-2/AN

+9.85

Multifamily 303 units 30/100 30.8 100 ft. 60.2 ft. 0.90

0.78

AC-3/AN +0.90 Multifamily 20 units 30/100 28.5 200 ft. 60.2 ft. 0.90 0.78

Table 3—Setback and Landscaping Requirements*

Use Yard Building Setbacks Landscaping/Buffers

Min. /Max. Proposed Required Proposed

Front - North Frontage Rd. & Shadowridge Dr.

0 ft. 5 ft. 7.5 ft. 7.5 ft.

Multifamily Rear - N/A N/A. N/A N/A N/A

Side - North & South Property Lines

0 or 3 ft. / 30 ft. North: +10 ft. South: +10 ft.

North: Bufferyard A (5-7 ft.)**

South: N/A 11 ft.

* Setback and landscaping requirements are the same for both the AC-2/AN and AC-3/AN zoning district

** A hedge and 80% tree coverage will be required as a condition of approval to ensure the buffer meets the requirements of Bufferyard ‘A’

Transportation The proposed site is addressed 7200 North Frontage Rd. however the property has double frontage with access to the site form North Frontage Road and Shadowridge Dr. Both entrances are parallel to one another and are connected via an internal “spine” road. The development standards for multifamily units above 8 units has the following transportation related requirements. 1. Pedestrian Access . A pedestrian path from the public sidewalk to the primary pedestrian entrance is required. 2. Vehicular Access for 100 or more units. Development sites with 100 or more units must provide a minimum of 2 ac-

cess points with impervious surfaces suitable for all users. 3. Cross Access . Each project must provide cross access to adjacent properties, unless wetlands, lakes, limited ac-

cess highways or other physical barriers prevent connectivity, as required by GMP Transportation Policy 1.10.5. 4. Pedestrian Circulation. A network of pedestrian connections must be designed to connect all entrances of each

building to the right-of-way, as required by Section 61.314(a) and (c). 5. Crosswalks . All crosswalks at driveways and curb cuts must be designed with pavers and/or textured colored con-

crete or similar to clearly define the pedestrian zone, as required by Section 61.314(e). Thermoplastic paint may be incorporated, but cannot meet this condition alone.

The proposed development has two access points, as mentioned above, on North Frontage Rd. and Shad-owridge Dr. with an internal sidewalk that connects to both sidewalks in the right-of-way (ROW). While cross access is not proposed at this time, the double frontage with access on both roads meets the intent of this re-quirement. Likewise should cross access be required in the future, the site can accommodate for this cross ac-cess with the hotel property to the north. The site does a fairly good job at pedestrian circulation, however there are some gaps where the applicant is proposing drive-way (tandem) spaces. Where these gaps occur, the sidewalks will need to be connected via a crosswalk in these instances and it must meet the requirements for cross walks outlined above. If need be, the driveway (tandem) spaces can be removed to accommodate the required pedestrian connectivity. Furthermore the applicant is required to have a minimum of 524 spaces where they are proposing 570 spaces. Please see Table 4 above for further parking requirements. Urban Design As previously discussed the applicant is proposing to construct several buildings as part of the overall 323 unit apartment complex. The main building is internal to the site with 4 smaller buildings fronting onto North Frontage Rd. and Shadow Ridge Dr. The new development standards for multifamily units above 8 units has the following Urban Design related requirements: 1. Frontage Requirements. The front unit(s) must face the front. Each unit must be developed consistent with one of

the two following options: 1.) Frontage on a public street, or a private street that meets public street design stand-ards. 2.) Modifications may be granted through the master plan application for rear units to front on a courtyard or a water body.

2. Vehicular Use Area . Parking is not permitted between the building and the street, but is permitted on the side and rear of the building.

As mentioned above the proposed multifamily development will have buildings that front both streets. Likewise, the appli-cant is not proposing any parking in front of any of the outermost buildings where parking is predominately located to the side and rear of those buildings. The site also falls in the Aircraft Noise Overlay District which has specific requirements for building construction. The proposed multifamily development must meet the Aircraft Noise development requirements identified in Sec. 58.380-58.384 of the City Code.

Table 4—Parking Requirements

Use Dwelling

Units

Max. Ratio (spaces/

unit)

Min. Spaces Required

Studio/1 br. 185 du. 1.5/unit 278

2 br. 122 du. 1.75/unit 214

3 br. 16 du. 2/unit 32

Total Required N/A N/A 524

Total Provided 570

Public Safety The Orlando Police Department has reviewed the plans for the Addison at Orlando Gateway located at 7200 North Frontage Rd., utilizing CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) principles. CPTED emphasizes the proper design and effective use of a created environment to reduce crime and enhance the quality of life. There are four overlapping strategies in CPTED that apply to any development: Natural Surveillance, Natural Access Control, Territorial Reinforcement and Target Hardening. School Impacts The applicant must apply for school concurrency prior to TRC (Technical Review Committee). The proposed develop-ment will be adding 323 dwelling units. On July 7, 2008, the City adopted a Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) and the Amended Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and Implementation of Con-currency which re-quires all residential developments be subject to school concurrency review. A list of exemptions from this review is pro-vided under Section 16.2 of the Agreement. Included in the list of exemptions are DRIs that have filed a complete appli-cation for a development order prior to May 1, 2005 (Section 16.2(j)).

Aerial Photo

N

SH

AD

OW

RID

GE

D

R

S S

EM

OR

AN

B

LV

D

Property Survey

Site Plan

Proposed Landscape Plan Bufferyard ‘A’ Required

Portion of the property zoned AC-3/AN

Bui ld ing Renderings

Proposed Elevat ions– Bui ld ing Type 1

Proposed Elevat ions– Dog Wash & Garage

Proposed Elevat ions– Trash Compactor & Car Wash

Site Photos

Approx. location where Buffer-yard ‘A’ is required.

Site as viewed from Shad-owridge Dr., looking northeast

Site as viewed from North Front-age Rd., looking southwest

[Source: Google Street View]

Findings The request is consistent with the requirements for approval of a Master Plan as contained in LDC Section 65.335, per the findings below: 1. The proposed use is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Plan. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the purpose and intent of the PD zoning district and all other requirements of

the LDC. 3. The proposed use will be compatible with surrounding land uses and the general character of the area. 4. The necessary public facilities will be adequate to serve the proposed use, or will be provided by the applicant as a

condition of this approval. Staff recommends approval of MPL2019-10000 subject to the conditions below.

Condit ions of Approval Growth Management

1. The proposed project is consistent with the existing uses in the area and adjacent properties and complies with the

City’s Growth Management Plan. The applicant shall submit a school concurrency application to OCPS prior to TRC.

Land Development

1. Land Use and Zoning. Except as provided herein, development of the property shall be consistent with the development standards of the AC-2/AN and AC-3/AN zoning districts as well as Chapter 58, Part 3I of City Code for multifamily developments above 8 units.

2. Conditions of Approval. The conditions of approval in this Staff Report must be adhered to and the neces-sary changes must be made on the plans submitted for building permit. Failure to do so will delay the issuance of your permit.

3. General Code Compliance. Development of the proposed project should be consistent with the conditions in this report and all codes and ordinances of the City of Orlando, the State of Florida, and all other applicable regulato-ry agencies. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencing development.

4. Minor modifications. Zoning variances may be approved pursuant to the procedures set forth in Part 2J Chapter 65, Orlando City Code. Additionally, recognizing that development plans can change in small ways between the planning and permitting stages of development, the planning official may approve up to a 10% modification of any applicable numerical development standard if the planning official finds that the proposed modification is con-sistent with the applicable goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP, is compatible with nearby existing land uses, would not result in inadequate public facilities, and is otherwise consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. When approving such a modification of a development standard, the planning official may impose one or more of the conditions of development provided at section 65.334, Orlando City Code, but such condition or conditions must be reasonably calculated to mitigate the identifiable land use impacts of the modified standard.

5. Regulations Subject to Code. Except as provided herein, the proposed project is subject to the conditions of this report and all codes and ordinances of the State of Florida, City of Orlando and all other applicable regulatory agencies. All other applicable state or federal permits must also be obtained before commencing development.

6. Consistency: Development within the subject property must remain consistent with all exhibits provided within this application subject to the conditions ultimately approved by City Council.

7. Expiration of the Master Plan. The applicant must receive a building permit for the work requiring the master plan within two years of the master plan approval. If the applicant does not receive the building permit within two years, then the master plan is no longer valid and the applicant must reapply for a master plan if the applicant wish-es to proceed with a development requiring a master plan. If the building permit for the work requiring the master plan expires before a certificate of occupancy or certificate of completion is issued for the work requiring the master plan, then the master plan is no longer valid and the applicant must reapply for a master plan if the applicant wishes to proceed with a development requiring a master plan.

8. Florida Statutes. As provided by subsection 166.033(5), Florida Statutes, issuance of a development permit by a municipality does not in any way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the municipality for issuance of the permit if the appli-cant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. In accordance with subsection 166.033(5), Florida Statutes, it

Condit ions of Approval (Cont ’d)

is hereby made a condition of this permit that all other applicable state or federal permits be obtained before com-mencement of the development.

9. Bufferyard. A Bufferyard ‘A’ is required along the northern property line. A minimum of 80% tree coverage and a hedge is required per the requirements of Bufferyard ‘A’.

10. Perimeter Landscaping. Perimeter landscape areas required for vehicular use areas adjacent to property lines and public rights-of-way shall contain at least one tree for every 50 lineal feet or fraction thereof. Required trees shall have a minimum caliper of 3 in., a minimum overall height of 12 ft., and a minimum clear-trunk height of 6 ft. Perimeter landscape areas shall also contain a continuous row of evergreen groundcovers and plants not to exceed 4 feet in height. Required plants shall be a minimum height of 18 in. at time of planting. At least 60% of the required plants shall have a natural mature height of 3 ft.

11. Landscape Islands. Landscape areas and intermediate landscape areas shall contain a minimum of one can-opy tree with a 3 in. caliper, a minimum overall height of 12 ft., and a minimum clear-trunk height of 6 ft.

12. Aircraft Noise Overlay. The subject site must comply with the development standards set forth for Zoned D in the Aircraft Noise Overlay District (Sec. 58.370 - Sec. 58.372). The applicant must provide a waiver of claims and public notification of potential noise impacts, and must comply with the Sound Level Reduction (SLR) Design Re-quirements for 25 decibels at the time of permitting. The aforementioned regulations can be found in Sec. 58.381 - Sec. 58.384 of City Code.

Urban Design

1. The elevations for the parking garages, particularly the street-side elevations, are very disjointed. Staff applauds the use of varied materials and form but recommends that the design be streamlined a bit to provide a more consistent aesthetic across the small buildings.

2. The street-facing side of the garages must contain a minimum of 15% transparent material.

3. The south side of building type V must be treated as the front in terms of transparency. Additional transparency may be required.

4. A minimum 15% transparent material is required on all façades facing a public street, private street, or courtyard, on each story below the roof line. A minimum 10% transparent material is required on all interior side façades on each story below the roof line. Calculations showing compliance with this requirement must be provided at time of permit..

5. All trim details, including window trims, must be raised from the surface of the building.

6. All building materials and colors must be called out on the elevations when submitted for permit. It is unclear what the hatched area on several portions of the facades are; it is staff's belief that these may be screened in porches,

this must be clarified.

7. The elevations appear to show direct access from first floor units to the street/parking lot through their front porch. Should this be the case the site and landscape plans must be updated to reflect this access. Staff encourages this direct access to the street but thoughtful design must take place to differentiate the public and private spaces through landscape design and material treatments.

8. Dumpsters, including recycling containers, must be shown on final plans at time of permitting. All dump-sters and trash compactors must be screened with solid walls to match the principal structure. Decorative gates must be in-stalled to coordinate with principal structure. Landscape screen including low hedge and groundcover is required to soften the view from the public ROW.

9. All accessory buildings must be constructed of materials that are complimentary to those materials and finishes found in the main residential buildings. Elevations and details of each accessory building are required at time of per-mitting.

10. It is unclear as to the proposed location of the mechanical equipment for all of the residential and amenity buildings. All a/c units and mechanical equipment must meet the screening requirements of the LDC.

11. All electrical transformers and backflow preventers must be shown on the final site plan when submitted for permits. They must also be located in such a way to minimize the appearance towards the ROW and may not be located be-tween the building and ROW. All transformers and backflow preventers must be screened thorough the use of walls, fences or hedging along three sides.

12. A full photometric plan showing compliance with Chapter 63 Part 2M of City Code is required at time of permitting.

Page 21


13. It is anticipated that a pool and additional amenities may be added to the site plan prior to permitting, specifically ad-jacent to Building 1. A detailed plan including all landscaping, lighting and fencing must be provided at the time of permitting. All fencing and landscaping should be of the same quality and general palate as the remainder of the site. If additional amenities, such as a pool are added around the perimeter of the site an appearance review, via separate determination, may be required.

14. Care must be taken in the placement of all trees within the property as well as the location of stop signs and pedes-trian crossing signs so that the trees do not block view to the directional/warning signs.

15. There is an area is designated as a dog run on some plans. It is recommended that any fencing located in this area to be architectural mesh or similar quality. At minimum the fence must be a black coated vinyl.

16. It appears that the proposed landscape score is much lower than what Chapter 60 of code requires. An updated landscape score sheet showing compliance with Chapter 60. It is recommended that the landscape score sheet be attached as a separate document from the landscape plan as this will make the document more legible.

17. The landscape plan must also contain a key detailing each species of planting that is proposed for the site.

Transportation

1. Except as where noted in this staff report, all aspects of the site plan are required to conform to all applicable mini-mum standards set forth in the editions of the City Code and the City Engineering Standards Manual that are in force at the time of any construction of this project.

2. Support of this submittal by the Transportation Dept. does not constitute final engineering approval of this concept for development. Materials and designs for transportation related elements of the project must meet or exceed standards in the versions of the City Code and Engineering Standards Manual in effect at the time of submittal to Permitting Services.

3. Proper sightlines must be maintained at all driveways and parking areas. Site plans and landscaping plans submit-ted to Permitting Services should include sightline triangles and dumpster pad locations. AutoTurn analysis for emer-gency vehicles and solid waste collection should be attached to plans to prevent delays in processing.

4. Bicycle parking shall be provided in accordance with the standards of Chapter 61, Part 3D of the Orlando Land De-velopment Code, and shall be made available prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for the use being served. Bike racks must be installed on an impervious surface near entrances, and situated to avoid conflicts with pedestrians or other vehicles. Locations must be shown on plans submitted to Permitting Services. For the proposed use, at least one long-term or covered bicycle parking space and one-short-term space must be available for every 20 units.

5. Pedestrian pathways on both sides of the E/W driveway must extend to the sidewalks along North Frontage Rd and Shadowridge Dr.

6. Pedestrian pathways in front of 90 degree parking stalls must be 7 ft. wide unless all stalls are equipped with wheel stops. Pedestrian pathways abutting travel aisles or parallel parking spaces must be a minimum of 6 ft. wide.

7. The developer must add a 10 ft. wide left turn lane for north bound traffic on North Frontage Rd while maintaining pedestrian refuge area in the crosswalk on the south approach of this intersection. A traffic study demonstrating that a northbound left is not needed based on the volumes of turning and opposing traffic on this street must be submit-ted to forego construction of this left turn lane. The study must be submitted to City Transportation Engineering far enough in advance of submittal of plans to Permitting Services to avoid delays in plan review..

Fire

1. TRC fire code site review is preliminary in nature and is not an official approval of the project as a whole. It is intend-ed to expose or prevent evident design deficiencies with State and City Fire Codes. The architectural design of the building, life safety features, floor plans, egress system, fire protection systems, fire department access and MEP will be reviewed in detail for State, Fire Code, FFPC and City Fire Code compliance at the time of permit application.

2. Conditional to this review the design of all buildings must account for fire department access. The access road itself must extend 50ft. from an exterior doorway that allow access to the building’s interior via a common hall or common lobby area, or the largest tenant area if the building does not have a common interior area. NFPA 1.18.2.3.2.1

3. Any portion of the building or exterior wall of the first story shall be located not more than 150 ft from the fire depart-ment access road as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. The distance can


be increased to 450ft. if the building is protected by an automatic sprinkler system. [NFPA 1.18.2.3.2.2 and NFPA 1.18.2.3.2.2.1]

4. An approved turnaround shall be provided for fire apparatus where an access road is a dead end in access of 150 ft. When a dead end road will not accommodate an approved t-turn or turn-a-bout a minimum width of 25 ft. will be re-quired. The turnabout shall be the minimum 20ft. width of the fire department access road and sized for the dimen-sions of the largest OFD apparatus. Use of areas subject to obstruction by vehicles such as loading docks and park-ing garages is prohibited. Acceptable turnarounds can include T-turn, Y-turn or cul-de-sac. See Exhibits in NFPA Fire Code handbook. NFPA 1.18.2.3.4.4

5. All fire department access roadways shall have an all-weather driving surface, capable of supporting the load of fire apparatus, a minimum 20 ft. in width and a minimum vertical clearance of at least 13 ft. 6 in. [NFPA 1 18.2.2.5.4 and NFPA 1 18.2.3.4.1.1] City of Orlando apparatus requires a turning radius dimension of 30 inside and 50 exterior and shall maintain the minimum 20ft. width. An auto-turn analysis is required for the radius turns indicated on the site plan. NFPA 1.18.3.4.3.1 and NFPA 1.18.3.4.3.2

6. The plan indicates fire hydrants will be required. Because building information is not provided, fire hydrant location and spacing will be reviewed at the time of building permitting. All portions of an unsprinklered building must be with-in 300 ft hose lay distance of a fire hydrant. All portions of a sprinklered building must be within 500 ft hose lay dis-tance of a fire hydrant. City Code ch 24.27(f)

Public Works

1. There is utility easement in the west and east of the site. Please provide the setbacks from the building to the bound-aries and all the easements' location in the site plan. The building is not allowed in the easement.

Please note the following will need to be addressed and met during the Engineering permit review process: 1. Per Section 7.01 of the City's ESM, any proposed project to be built in the City of Orlando which alters the existing

topographic characteristics will be required to provide stormwater treatment. Alterations of surface drainage (with the exception of resurfacing and landscaping elements only) is defined as: changing the flow patterns within the redevel-opment area; changing the mode of transport from overland flow or open channel to a closed conduit, etc.; changing an impervious surface’s character (from building to parking, wet bottom pond or a new building or vice versa); changing the character of a parking surface (from shell base to asphalt, etc.); or remodeling of an existing building which changes its footprint or number of floors. When applying for an Engineering Permit, please submit the Drain-age Report, Geotech Report, Stormwater Tabulations, and all necessary docs needed in order to verify the City's and Water Management District standards are met.

2. Water quality recovery shall be recovered per the requirement of the Water Management District. Please provide model demonstrating the recovery analysis. A Water Management District water treatment permit may be required.

3. Provide a certification signed by the Engineer, licensed in the State of Florida, responsible for the stormwater design which reads as follows: "I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the design of the Stormwater Management System for the project known as: (Project Name) meets all of the requirements and has been designed substantially in accordance with the City of Orlando Stormwater Management Criteria."

4. All proposed and existing sidewalk that is touched during construction will need to be updated to the newest ADA requirement.

5. Sidewalk construction shall be required at the time of this substantial improvement per Sec. 61.225 and 66.200 of the City of Orlando’s Muni Code. Proposed sidewalks must be constructed along the entire length of the property and shall be located against the public right-of-way.

6. A City Service Agreement is required by the Owner if portion of sidewalk is within private property. The easement would protect the Owner from maintaining the sidewalk and from other potential issues. Otherwise, the Owner would be responsible to maintain and be liable for potential litigation if someone is injured on a failing sidewalk that is in disrepair.

7. Please clarify whether the sidewalk will be paver. Please note that if pavers are to be constructed beyond the prop-erty line and out into the City's Right of Way the owner is required submit a signed and recorded a Right-of-Way Pavers Agreement. Sidewalk portion of driveway must still be composed of 3,000 psi concrete. Refer to http://www.cityoforlando.net/permits/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2014/03/Pavers_Encroach_Agmt1.pdf

8. This site appears to be over 1 acre. Construction activities including clearing, grading and excavating activities shall obtain a FDEP NPDES NOI. A copy of the NPDES NOI Acknowledgement letter must be received in the Office of Permitting Services prior to permit approval.

http://www.cityoforlando.net/permits/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2014/03/Pavers_Encroach_Agmt1.pdf

http://www.cityoforlando.net/permits/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2014/03/Pavers_Encroach_Agmt1.pdf


9. Please submit a detailed, scalable, fully dimensioned site plan of the location. The site plan should include but not be limited to the site legal description, the building, streets, sidewalks and property lines, and the location of the pro-posed work. Site plans should clarify what is existing and what proposed.

10. Please provide a signed and sealed existing topographic survey with datum and official benchmark in the NAVD88 vertical datum. Per the City’s ESM Section 7.01.A.1, survey data shall be gathered to least 25 feet beyond the prop-erty line or as far offsite as required to assure offsite drainage patterns are maintained.

11. A performance guarantee for public improvements is needed in the amount of 110% of the public improvements cost. Cost sheet forms and instructions are available at our website at www.cityoforlando.net/permits. Performance Guarantee is required before the issuance of the permit. The original needs to be hand delivered to the receptionist at Permitting Services with the referenced case number. In addition, attach a copy of this in the resubmitted pack-age. Please allow approximately 1 week after the Performance Guarantee is submitted to allow for the City’s Legal Office to review.

Police

1. The Orlando Police Department has reviewed the plans for the Addison at Orlando Gateway located at 7200 North Frontage Rd., utilizing CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) principles. CPTED emphasizes the proper design and effective use of a created environment to reduce crime and enhance the quality of life. There are four overlapping strategies in CPTED that apply to any development: Natural Surveillance, Natural Access Con-trol, Territorial Reinforcement and Target Hardening.

Parks

For informational purposes: The City has implemented a Parks Impact Fee on all residential housing units to help meet the recreation needs of Orlando’s residents. All new housing units are subject to the fee.

Any new construction, change in use, addition or redevelopment of a site or structure shall be subject to a review for Parks Impact Fees. Applicable fees will be due at the time of building permit issuance, subject to change upon final per-mit plan review. A Parks Impact Fee credit may be given on residential units that were or are going to be demolished if eligibility require-ments are met. For questions and information regarding Parks Impact Fee rates you may contact Nancy Ottini at (407) 246-3529 or [email protected] Any exemptions or credits against the Parks Impact Fee must be reviewed prior to permit issuance. All Parks Impact Fee Credits shall be reviewed and processed by the Parks Impact Fee Coordinator, if applicable, upon request by applicant.

Wastewater

The following shall be incorporated into the Construction Plans submitted for review prior to Building Permit issuance:

1. City records (MapWorks GIS) and Application Utility Drawings show an 8” PVC public gravity sanitary sewer on Shadowridge DR, south of Forbes PL. However, Record Drawings per Surveyed As-Builts prepared under Pro-ject # 27113 by Madden Civil Engineers, Inc. indicate a 10” PVC gravity main. The Applicants’ Engineer shall independently verify the sewer main size and confirm that there is enough capacity for the proposed 324 unit multi-family complex.

2. Capacity of the City’s sewer collection system downstream of the point of connection shall be evaluated. The point of analysis and methodology shall be verified with the Water Reclamation Division prior to conducting the sewer capacity analysis. Contact the WRD to discuss the methodology to follow in the preparation of the capaci-ty analysis report.

3. Prepare a Civil/Site Utility plan that depicts connection into the City’s sanitary sewer collection system. 4. The Water Reclamation Division will need to review construction plans prior to permit issuance to assure that the

sanitary sewer facilities to serve the proposed multi-family development will meet the City’s Standards including Chapter 9 of the Engineering Standards Manual and all applicable City Standard Details.

5. Please contact Julio Morais [(407) 246-3724 or [email protected]] and/or Dave Breitrick, PE, Engi-neering and Mapping Manager [(407) 246-3525 or [email protected]] with any questions about Water Reclamation Division review.

Contact Informat ion Growth Management For questions regarding Growth Management plan review, please contact Elisabeth Dang at 407.246.3408 or [email protected]. Land Development For questions regarding Land Development review, please contact Chris DeLoatche at 407.246.3624 or [email protected]. Urban Design For questions regarding Urban Design plan review, please contact Jacques Coulon at 407.246.3427 or Jacques.Coulon @cityoforlando.net. Transportation For questions regarding Transportation Planning review, please contact John Rhoades at 407.246.2293 or [email protected] Development Review For questions regarding Development Review contact Keith Grayson at 407.246.3234 or [email protected]. Fire For any questions regarding fire issues, please contact Chip Howard at 407.246.2143 or at [email protected]. Building For questions regarding Building Plan Review issues contact Don Fields at 407.246.2654 or [email protected]. Parks For questions regarding Parks Plan Review issues contact Ken Pelham at 407.246.4280 or [email protected]. For questions regarding Tree Review issues contact Andy Kittsley at 407.246.2701 or [email protected]. Water Reclamation For questions regarding Wastewater Review issues contact Julio Morais at 407.246.3525 or [email protected]. Impact Fees For questions regarding Impact Fee issues contact Nancy Jurus-Ottini at 407.246.3529 or [email protected].

Police For questions regarding Police plan review, please contact Audra Rigby at 407.246.2454 or [email protected]. Public Works For questions regarding Public Works plan review, please contact Liuliu Wu at 407.246.3758 or [email protected] .

Review Process—Next Steps 1. MPB minutes scheduled for review and approval by City Council. 2. Building permits may be submitted following the MPB recommendation of approval but cannot be approved until the

City Council minutes approving the action of the MPB are published. 3. A Plat pre-app will be required prior to the submission of a plat application.

ADDISON @ ORLANDO GATEWAY APARTMENTS · 2019. 3. 12. · 2016 - Current owners acquired the...

Documents

Transcript of ADDISON @ ORLANDO GATEWAY APARTMENTS · 2019. 3. 12. · 2016 - Current owners acquired the...