Adaptation of silviculture to climate change · Close-to-nature silviculture (CNS) elements E.g....

35
Adaptation of silviculture to climate change Peter Spathelf Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development (Germany) International Conference on Multipurpose Forest Ecosystem Management in a Changing Environment Nanning, Nov 23-25, 2011

Transcript of Adaptation of silviculture to climate change · Close-to-nature silviculture (CNS) elements E.g....

Adaptation of silvicultureto climate change

Peter SpathelfEberswalde University for Sustainable

Development (Germany)

International Conference on Multipurpose Forest Ecosystem Management in a

Changing EnvironmentNanning, Nov 23-25, 2011

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

Outline

1. CC impacts on forests and vulnerability

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

2. Silvicultural legacy of Central Europe: Close-to-Nature Silviculture (CNS)

3. Strategies and options of adaptation by silviculture

4. CNS and adaptation principles; conclusions

Climate change in Germany: scenarios (A1b)Temperature

Stock (2008), (PIK)

Statement / conclusions:•Highest temperatureincrease in autumn and winter

•Extension of vegetationperiod

•Change of winter and latefrost regime

Statement / conclusions:•Highest temperatureincrease in autumn and winter

•Extension of vegetationperiod

•Change of winter and latefrost regime

Temperature change

2046/2055-1951/2003Difference in K

Climate change in Germany: scenarios (A1b)Precipitation

Ennepetal, 21.06.2008

Stock (2008), PIK

Statement / conclusions:•Disparate distributionsintensified

•Less continuous rain, moreintense rain

•Less in summer, more in winter

Statement / conclusions:•Disparate distributionsintensified

•Less continuous rain, moreintense rain

•Less in summer, more in winter

Precipitation change

2046/2055-1951/2003Difference in mm

source: Beck, in Bolte & Ibisch (2008) Drought years 1992, 1995

Response: 1) growth

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

Response: 2) salvage cutting

thousand m³

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 20070

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Scha

d hol

zme n

ge (i

n Ts

d. m

?

…and oak ‘decline’ in Brandenburg

Möller (2008)

Salvage cutting in Europe since 1850 due to storm damage…

Dobbertin & DeVries (2008)

1970

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

1961-1990 2011-2040 2031-2060

Forest fires in Brandenburg (data acc. to Forest Service):∅ 1992-2005: 267 ha (514 fires/a)

Response: 3) fire risk

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

Components of ecosystem vulnerability

Exposure Sensitivity

Adaptive capacity

Vulnerability

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

Vulnerability: tree species and regions

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

high moderate low

• Northeastern

Germany

• Southeastern

basin and hill

landscape

• Valley of the river

Rhine

• Pre-Alps

• West German lowland basins

• Central mountain ranges and

Harz

• Erzgebirge, Thüringen and

Bavarian forest

• Mountain ranges left and right

of the river Rhine

• Alps

• Bavarian hill landscape

• Northwest

German

lowlands

Categories of climate risk regions in Germany (CRAMER et al. 2005, www.waldundklima.net)

Outline

1. CC impacts on forests and vulnerability

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

2. Silvicultural legacy of Central Europe: Close-to-Nature Silviculture (CNS)

3. Strategies and options of adaptation by silviculture

4. CNS and adaptation principles; conclusions

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

…introduced and promoted the concept of ‚permanent forest‘ (continuous-cover forestry) in Germany

Alfred Möller (1860 – 1922),Eberswalde

German mainstream silvicultureover decades

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

Close-to-nature-silviculture, since 1980

• Promotion of the natural and/or site-adapted tree species composition, often based on the assumed potential natural vegetation,

• Promotion of mixed and ‘structured’ forests,• Avoidance of clear cuts,• Promotion of natural regeneration,• Silvicultural practices that focus on individual trees,• Integration of forest functions at small spatial scales

Broad programme!

Close-to-nature silviculture (CNS)elements

E.g. Silvicultural programme of Brandenburg 2004, principle 1:‚…resilience of forests through more complex stand structures, mixed stands and long-term natural regeneration…’

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

atlantic

mediterr.

boreal

CNS

CNSextension

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

PineOakAlder, willow

Beech BERLIN

Natural forest cover of Brandenburg

ConifersBroadleavedtree species

Current situation

BERLIN

Maps: Hofmann (2004)

CNStree species of assumed pnV

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

from Brang, Larsen, Spathelf et al. (2011, in prep.)

Life span of patches [a]

Pat

chsi

ze[h

a]

0.01

0.1

1.0

10

100

1000

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 4500

Single-tree selection

Group selection

Shelterwood

NDBM

CNSsize of cutting areas and life span

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

CNSintegrative approach

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

plantation

Clear cut with planting

Clear cut with natural regeneration

Variable retention partial cutting

Pioneer forests after disturbance

Selection forest

Man

agin

g in

tens

ity

Tree species and structural heterogenity

Old-growth forest

Close-to-nature silviculture(CNS)

acc. to Puettmann et al. (2008)

CNS status

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

Outline

1. CC impacts on forests and vulnerability

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

2. Silvicultural legacy of Central Europe: Close-to-Nature Silviculture (CNS)

3. Strategies and options of adaptation by silviculture

4. CNS and adaptation principles; conclusions

• Passive or autonomous adaptation (‚succession‘)

• Active adaptation (‚adaptation interventions‘)

hotspots approach

Adaptation strategies

from Millar et al. (2007, adapted)

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

Example: UK

Source: Ray et al. (2011)

Phytophthoraramorum Beech decline

Dothistromaseptosporum on

pine

Sitka spruce wind damage

Sitka spruce drought damage

Active adaptation: hotspots

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

• Maintain forest climate• Reduce average growing stock • Replace high-risk stands• Increase species richness and structural

diversity, and• Maintain & increase genetic variation within

tree species

Adaptation principles

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

Adaptation principles: results of a European survey

Tree species selection

preference

Tending / forest structure change

Soil management change

Inclusion of risk management in FM

0

20

40

60

80

100

Res

pons

es in

%

Data from COST Echoes: 21 countries involved

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

Infiltration m³/a mm/a % of

open land prec. Pine forests 300 47 7 Beech forests 900 141 23 Pine and beech forests

400 63 10

acc. to Müller (2007)

Species richness/mixture: seepage

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

Species richness/mixture: resilience

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

Norris et al. (2011)

Species richness/mixture: genetic variation

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

Source: Hampe and Petit 2005

Polewards migrationof species

Hampe & Petit (2005)

gap dynamicscohort dynamicssucession afterstand replacing

disturbance

Clear / stripcutting

partial cutting

partial and selective cutting

acc. to Kuuluvainen (2002, adapted)

Implementation: variable cutting schemes

Group selection system promising!

Implementation: planting ‘new’ provenances of established species

Suitability of provenances with higher drought stress tolerance from Southeast Europe?

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

Czajkowski & Bolte (2006)

Non-native tree species with good performanceand low risk in Northeast Germany

• Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii)• Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia)• Grand fir (Abies grandis)• Red oak (Quercus rubra)• Western red cedar (Thuja plicata)

Non-native tree species with good performanceand low risk in Northeast Germany

• Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii)• Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia)• Grand fir (Abies grandis)• Red oak (Quercus rubra)• Western red cedar (Thuja plicata)

Implementation: planting ‘new’ species

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

Outline

1. CC impacts on forests and vulnerability

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

2. Silvicultural legacy of Central Europe: Close-to-Nature Silviculture (CNS)

3. Strategies and options of adaptation by silviculture

4. CNS and adaptation principles; conclusions

CNS compatible with adaptation principles?

from Brang, Larsen, Spathelf et al. (2011, in prep.)

Adpatation principle Maintenance of forest climate

Reduction of average growing stock

Replacement of high-risk stands

Maintenance and increase of genetic variation within trees

IINNCCRREEAASSEE OOFF SSPPEECCIIEESS RRIICCHHNNEESSSS AANNDD SSTTRRUUCCTTUURRAALL DDIIVVEERRSSIITTYY

Number of non-compatible principles (−)

CNS type Single-tree selection system

+ + − + − + 1-2

Group selection system + + + + + Shelterwood system + + + + + − 1 NDBM + − + + + + 1

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

CNS compatible with adaptation principles, but needs some adjustments!

• Increase of species richness, genetic variation and structural diversity most important adjustment screws for forest adaptationTemperate, subcontinental zone of Europe: High need for adapted forests to provide a high variety of goods and services; measures: forest conversion, structural enrichment, incorporation of stand legacies (higher degree of ‚oldgrowthness‘), forest conservationTropics and subtropics: High importance of adapted tropical forests for global mitigation needs (REDD+), local livelihoods (safety nets for poor people) and for the containment of transboundary conflicts; measures: forest conservation (‘no access’), SFM

Conclusions I

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

Conclusions II

from BOLTE, A., AMMER, C., LÖF, M., MADSEN, P., NABUURS, G.-J., SCHALL, P., ROCK, J. & SPATHELF, P. (2009): Adaptive forest management in central Europe: Climate change impacts, strategies and integrative concept. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 24. 473-482.

Suggestion for an integrative concept of adaptive forest management

Suitability checks / Modelling

Priority mapping of adaptation strategies

Implementation of adaptation measures

Scale

International

National

Regional

Local

}

Adaptation Mitigation

Decision support

Decision support

Suggestion for an integrative concept of adaptive forest management

Suitability checks / Modelling

Priority mapping of adaptation strategies

Implementation of adaptation measures

Scale

International

National

Regional

Local

}

Adaptation Mitigation

Decision support

Decision support

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change; Nanning, 23-25 Nov 2011

Forest conversion in pinestands near Eberswalde

Thank you for your attention!