Adams Central Community Schools 0015 · No Finding 5 11. Percent of children with parental consent...

1604
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example Indiana State Department of Education 2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix Adams Central Community Schools 0015 RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support 76.4% Meets Requirements Universal Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score 52.8% x .50 = 26.4% 100% x .30 = 30% 100% x .20 = 20% Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE 26.4% + 30% + 20% = 76.4%

Transcript of Adams Central Community Schools 0015 · No Finding 5 11. Percent of children with parental consent...

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    Adams Central Community Schools

    0015

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    76.4% Meets Requirements Universal

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    52.8% x .50 = 26.4%

    100% x .30 = 30%

    100% x .20 = 20%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    26.4% + 30% + 20% = 76.4%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    26.9% 3

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    42.3% 5

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    71.53 1

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 92.11 2

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 64.3% 3

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.34% 1

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 40% N/A

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 80% 4

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 78.7% 2

    Total Results Score 21

    Weighted Percentage for Results 52.8%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    100% No Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    100% No Finding 5

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 35

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants Yes 5

    ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5

    Total Data Score 35

    Weighted Percentage for Data 100%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    North Adams Community Schools

    0025

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    61.4% Needs Assistance Targeted

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    39% x .50 = 19.5%

    80.9% x .30 = 24.3%

    88% x .20 = 17.6%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    19.5% + 24.3% + 17.6% = 61.4%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    22.8% 3

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    23.6% 2

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    100.26 4

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 89.58 2

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 25.9% 1

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.73% 1

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains No Data 1

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 53.3% 1

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 81.7% 3

    Total Results Score 18

    Weighted Percentage for Results 39%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 98% Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    100% No Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    67% Finding 1

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 31

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 80.9%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants Yes 5

    ISTAR-KR Participation No 1

    Total Data Score 31

    Weighted Percentage for Data 88%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    South Adams Schools

    0035

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    73.1% Meets Requirements Universal

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    46.1% x .50 = 23.1%

    100% x .30 = 30%

    100% x .20 = 20%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    23.1% + 30% + 20% = 73.1%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    38.3% 5

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    36.7% 4

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    100.54 4

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 109.78 5

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 58.3% 2

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 2.07% 1

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 77.8% N/A

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 50% 1

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 73.1% 2

    Total Results Score 24

    Weighted Percentage for Results 46.1%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    100% No Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    100% No Finding 5

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 35

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants Yes 5

    ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5

    Total Data Score 35

    Weighted Percentage for Data 100%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    M S D Southwest Allen County

    0125

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    76.1% Meets Requirements Universal

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    57% x .50 = 28.5%

    100% x .30 = 30%

    88% x .20 = 17.6%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    28.5% + 30% + 17.6% = 76.1%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    31.3% 4

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    29.1% 3

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    98.63 4

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 104.79 4

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 67.4% 4

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 0.85% 5

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 76.1% 2

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 76.2% 3

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 72.2% 1

    Total Results Score 30

    Weighted Percentage for Results 57%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    100% No Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 30

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) No 1

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants Yes 5

    ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5

    Total Data Score 31

    Weighted Percentage for Data 88%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    Northwest Allen County Schools

    0225

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    91% Meets Requirements Universal

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    82% x .50 = 41%

    100% x .30 = 30%

    100% x .20 = 20%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    41% + 30% + 20% = 91%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    33% 4

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    32.9% 4

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    99.71 4

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 102.44 4

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 71.8% 4

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 0.83% 5

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 83.3% 4

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 94.6% 5

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 81.6% 3

    Total Results Score 37

    Weighted Percentage for Results 82%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    100% No Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 30

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants Yes 5

    ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5

    Total Data Score 35

    Weighted Percentage for Data 100%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    Fort Wayne Community Schools

    0235

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    65.8% Needs Assistance Targeted

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    39.5% x .50 = 19.8%

    86.7% x .30 = 26%

    100% x .20 = 20%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    19.8% + 26% + 20% = 65.8%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    17.3% 2

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    18.8% 2

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    88.65 2

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 98.24 3

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 48.8% 2

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.31% 1

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 74.4% 2

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 70.8% 2

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 77.5% 2

    Total Results Score 18

    Weighted Percentage for Results 39.5%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    Continued NonCompliance

    1

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 97% Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    95% Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance No 1

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 27

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 86.7%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants Yes 5

    ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5

    Total Data Score 35

    Weighted Percentage for Data 100%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    East Allen County Schools

    0255

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    64.2% Needs Assistance Targeted

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    32.5% x .50 = 16.3%

    93% x .30 = 27.9%

    100% x .20 = 20%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    16.3% + 27.9% + 20% = 64.2%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    26.2% 3

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    25.2% 3

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    89.8 3

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 101.32 4

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 55.7% 2

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.41% 1

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 69.8% 1

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 53.6% 1

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 66.6% 1

    Total Results Score 19

    Weighted Percentage for Results 32.5%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    Finding 1

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    96% Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    100% No Finding 5

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 31

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 93%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants Yes 5

    ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5

    Total Data Score 35

    Weighted Percentage for Data 100%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    Bartholomew Consolidated School Corp

    0365

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    72.8% Meets Requirements Universal

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    57% x .50 = 28.5%

    80.9% x .30 = 24.3%

    100% x .20 = 20%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    28.5% + 24.3% + 20% = 72.8%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    27.1% 3

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    32.7% 4

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    93.86 3

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 97.48 3

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 66.4% 3

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.27% 1

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 80.4% 3

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 71.6% 2

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 87% 4

    Total Results Score 26

    Weighted Percentage for Results 57%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 99% Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    96% Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    80% Finding 1

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 31

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 80.9%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants Yes 5

    ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5

    Total Data Score 35

    Weighted Percentage for Data 100%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    Flat Rock-Hawcreek School Corp

    0370

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    69.4% Needs Assistance Targeted

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    43.6% x .50 = 21.8%

    100% x .30 = 30%

    88% x .20 = 17.6%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    21.8% + 30% + 17.6% = 69.4%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    15.9% 1

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    27% 3

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    76.96 1

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 100.48 4

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 62.5% N/A

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.68% 1

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains No Data 1

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 83.3% N/A

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 82.4% 3

    Total Results Score 14

    Weighted Percentage for Results 43.6%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    100% No Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 30

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants Yes 5

    ISTAR-KR Participation No 1

    Total Data Score 31

    Weighted Percentage for Data 88%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    Benton Community School Corp

    0395

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    71.4% Meets Requirements Universal

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    42.8% x .50 = 21.4%

    100% x .30 = 30%

    100% x .20 = 20%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    21.4% + 30% + 20% = 71.4%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    22.4% 2

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    27.1% 3

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    78.19 1

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 86.97 2

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 57.1% 2

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.62% 1

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 91.7% N/A

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 83.3% 4

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 64.9% 1

    Total Results Score 16

    Weighted Percentage for Results 42.8%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 98% Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    100% No Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    100% No Finding 5

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 35

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants Yes 5

    ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5

    Total Data Score 35

    Weighted Percentage for Data 100%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    Blackford County Schools

    0515

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    72.1% Meets Requirements Universal

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    60.5% x .50 = 30.3%

    80.9% x .30 = 24.3%

    88% x .20 = 17.6%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    30.3% + 24.3% + 17.6% = 72.1%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    25.2% 3

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    30.6% 4

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    95.31 4

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 97.16 3

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 71.4% 4

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.28% 1

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains No Data 1

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 84.6% 4

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 79.8% 3

    Total Results Score 27

    Weighted Percentage for Results 60.5%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    100% No Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    0% Finding 1

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 31

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 80.9%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants Yes 5

    ISTAR-KR Participation No 1

    Total Data Score 31

    Weighted Percentage for Data 88%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    Western Boone County Community School District

    0615

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    78.7% Meets Requirements Universal

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    68.9% x .50 = 34.4%

    80.9% x .30 = 24.3%

    100% x .20 = 20%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    34.4% + 24.3% + 20% = 78.7%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    29.3% 4

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    33.1% 4

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    99.12 4

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 105.53 4

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 87.5% 5

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.01% 1

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 83.3% N/A

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 76.9% 3

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 85.3% 4

    Total Results Score 29

    Weighted Percentage for Results 68.9%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    100% No Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    50% Finding 1

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 31

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 80.9%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants Yes 5

    ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5

    Total Data Score 35

    Weighted Percentage for Data 100%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    Zionsville Community Schools

    0630

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    82% Meets Requirements Universal

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    75.5% x .50 = 37.8%

    80.9% x .30 = 24.3%

    100% x .20 = 20%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    37.8% + 24.3% + 20% = 82%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    51.2% 5

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    47.8% 5

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    97.23 4

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 93.23 3

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 78.6% 5

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 0.73% 5

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 94.4% 5

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 78.3% 3

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 82.5% 3

    Total Results Score 38

    Weighted Percentage for Results 75.5%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    100% No Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    86% Finding 1

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 31

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 80.9%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants Yes 5

    ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5

    Total Data Score 35

    Weighted Percentage for Data 100%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    Lebanon Community School Corp

    0665

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    72% Meets Requirements Universal

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    58% x .50 = 29%

    76.5% x .30 = 23%

    100% x .20 = 20%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    29% + 23% + 20% = 72%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    31.7% 4

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    36.9% 4

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    88.09 2

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 106.16 4

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 69.8% 4

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.29% 1

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 88.4% 5

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 77.3% 3

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 79.7% 2

    Total Results Score 29

    Weighted Percentage for Results 58%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 98% Continued Noncompliance

    5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    100% No Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    40% Finding 1

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance No 1

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 27

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 76.5%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants Yes 5

    ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5

    Total Data Score 35

    Weighted Percentage for Data 100%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    Brown County School Corporation

    0670

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    82.2% Meets Requirements Universal

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    79.4% x .50 = 39.7%

    74.9% x .30 = 22.5%

    100% x .20 = 20%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    39.7% + 22.5% + 20% = 82.2%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    29.1% 4

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    36.1% 4

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    93.89 3

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 91.36 2

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 72.1% 4

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.28% 1

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 62.5% N/A

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 92.6% 5

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 91.3% 5

    Total Results Score 28

    Weighted Percentage for Results 79.4%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    No Evaluations No Evaluations N/A

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    67% Finding 1

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 26

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 74.9%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants Yes 5

    ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5

    Total Data Score 35

    Weighted Percentage for Data 100%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    Carroll Consolidated School Corp

    0750

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    76.3% Meets Requirements Universal

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    60.6% x .50 = 30.3%

    100% x .30 = 30%

    80% x .20 = 16%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    30.3% + 30% + 16% = 76.3%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    8.5% 1

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    13.6% 1

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    83.17 2

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 70.75 1

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 60% N/A

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 0.33% 5

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 100% N/A

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 87.5% 5

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 77.8% 2

    Total Results Score 17

    Weighted Percentage for Results 60.6%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    100% No Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 30

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) No 1

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants No 1

    ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5

    Total Data Score 27

    Weighted Percentage for Data 80%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    Delphi Community School Corp

    0755

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    72.1% Meets Requirements Universal

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    61.8% x .50 = 30.9%

    100% x .30 = 30%

    56% x .20 = 11.2%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    30.9% + 30% + 11.2% = 72.1%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    8.5% 1

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    13.6% 1

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    92.5 3

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 99.5 4

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 37.5% N/A

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 0.65% 5

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 77.8% N/A

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 85.7% 4

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 74.7% 2

    Total Results Score 20

    Weighted Percentage for Results 61.8%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    No Evaluations No Evaluations N/A

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 25

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) No 1

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) No 1

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) No 1

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants No 1

    ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5

    Total Data Score 19

    Weighted Percentage for Data 56%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    Pioneer Regional School Corp

    0775

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    84.8% Meets Requirements Universal

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    77.7% x .50 = 38.8%

    100% x .30 = 30%

    80% x .20 = 16%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    38.8% + 30% + 16% = 84.8%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    21.7% 2

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    16.7% 2

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    92.39 3

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 88.04 2

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 72.7% 4

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 0.6% 5

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 100% N/A

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 33.3% N/A

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 90.6% 5

    Total Results Score 23

    Weighted Percentage for Results 77.7%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    100% No Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 30

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) No 1

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants No 1

    ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5

    Total Data Score 27

    Weighted Percentage for Data 80%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    Lewis Cass Schools

    0815

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    66.6% Needs Assistance Targeted

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    61.1% x .50 = 30.5%

    74.9% x .30 = 22.5%

    68% x .20 = 13.6%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    30.5% + 22.5% + 13.6% = 66.6%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    21.3% 2

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    23.4% 2

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    106.25 5

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 111.84 5

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 50% N/A

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.43% 1

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains No Data 1

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 86.7% 5

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 77.6% 2

    Total Results Score 23

    Weighted Percentage for Results 61.1%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    75% Finding 1

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 26

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 74.9%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) No 1

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants No 1

    ISTAR-KR Participation No 1

    Total Data Score 23

    Weighted Percentage for Data 68%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    Logansport Community School Corp

    0875

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    60.9% Needs Assistance Targeted

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    25% x .50 = 12.5%

    100% x .30 = 30%

    92% x .20 = 18.4%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    12.5% + 30% + 18.4% = 60.9%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    12.5% 1

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    13.1% 1

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    79.75 1

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 81.94 1

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 58.3% 2

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.3% 1

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 78.7% 3

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 60.6% 1

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 56.8% 1

    Total Results Score 12

    Weighted Percentage for Results 25%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.

    No Finding 5

    11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 98% Finding 5

    12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

    100% No Finding 5

    13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.

    Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A

    Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5

    Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5

    Total Compliance Score 30

    Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%

  • Timely Data Submissions Matrix

    Data Collection Timely Total Points

    DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5

    DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5

    DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5

    DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5

    Part B Grants No 1

    ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5

    Total Data Score 31

    Weighted Percentage for Data 92%

  • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example

    Indiana State Department of Education

    2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix

    West Clark Community Schools

    0940

    RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support

    71% Meets Requirements Universal

    Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall

    RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score

    57% x .50 = 28.5%

    74.9% x .30 = 22.5%

    100% x .20 = 20%

    Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE

    28.5% + 22.5% + 20% = 71%

  • Results Matrix

    ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    English/Language Arts

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    31.8% 4

    Mathematics

    Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics

    34.3% 4

    ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score

    English/Language Arts

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts

    104.11 5

    Mathematics

    Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 114.3 5

    IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 68.9% 4

    Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.77% 1

    Preschool Data Percentage Score

    Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 83.4% 4

    Graduation Rate Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 79.5% 3

    Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score

    Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 71.3% 1

    Total Results Score 31

    Weighted Percentage for Results 57%

  • Compliance Matrix

    Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score

    4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.

    N size is too small N/A

    9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic grou


7.3.2 finding the percent (of a number)

7.3.2 finding the percent (of a number)

Acuerdo 0015-de-2009

Acuerdo 0015-de-2009

Revista Ahora 0015

Revista Ahora 0015

Cache g 0015 Opr03KIK

Cache g 0015 Opr03KIK

Prod 0015 Dsmag Es

Prod 0015 Dsmag Es

senikini 0015

senikini 0015

Europäische ETA-06/0015 TechnischeBewertung...Seite 2 der Europäischen Technischen Bewertung ETA-06/0015 vom 28.10.2016, ersetzt die Europäische technische Zulassung ETA-06/0015

Europäische ETA-06/0015 TechnischeBewertung...Seite 2 der Europäischen Technischen Bewertung ETA-06/0015 vom 28.10.2016, ersetzt die Europäische technische Zulassung ETA-06/0015

HackerBoxes 0015: Connect Everything - ESP32esp32.net/images/HackerBoxes/0015-Connect-Everything/HackerBoxes_0015... · HackerBoxes 0015: Connect Everything: 12 Steps 7/14/17, 3(10

HackerBoxes 0015: Connect Everything - ESP32esp32.net/images/HackerBoxes/0015-Connect-Everything/HackerBoxes_0015... · HackerBoxes 0015: Connect Everything: 12 Steps 7/14/17, 3(10

EDICTO 0015 DE 2015

EDICTO 0015 DE 2015

TEXT 640 '98...INHALTSVERZEICHNIS INDEX LOCTITE 242 LOCTITE 242 LOCTITE 242 0015 060953 0015 060553 0015 060553 0015 060303 0015 060303 0015 060303 L SILICON 5 6 7 7 9 10 11 24 21

TEXT 640 '98...INHALTSVERZEICHNIS INDEX LOCTITE 242 LOCTITE 242 LOCTITE 242 0015 060953 0015 060553 0015 060553 0015 060303 0015 060303 0015 060303 L SILICON 5 6 7 7 9 10 11 24 21

Finding Percent of Change. Percent of Change Finding the Percent of Change Percent of Change – the percent a quantity increases or decreases from the.

Finding Percent of Change. Percent of Change Finding the Percent of Change Percent of Change – the percent a quantity increases or decreases from the.

Lesson 26: Percent of a Quantity - EngageNY · finding the whole. Classwork Example 1 ... also play on a travel team. ... Lesson 26: Percent of a Quantity Exit Ticket

Lesson 26: Percent of a Quantity - EngageNY · finding the whole. Classwork Example 1 ... also play on a travel team. ... Lesson 26: Percent of a Quantity Exit Ticket

AE510_03 NACA 0015 Airfoil

AE510_03 NACA 0015 Airfoil

Finding Kidney Disease EarlyStates Renal Data System’s 2003 Annual Report, 45 percent of people who began dialysis in 2001 had diabetes mellitus and 26 percent had hypertension (high

Finding Kidney Disease EarlyStates Renal Data System’s 2003 Annual Report, 45 percent of people who began dialysis in 2001 had diabetes mellitus and 26 percent had hypertension (high

0015 Key Points 2015

0015 Key Points 2015

06-4 Finding a Number When the Percent is Known.notebook · 2012. 5. 13. · 064 Finding a Number When the Percent is Known.notebook December 05, 2013 The store owner offered to order

06-4 Finding a Number When the Percent is Known.notebook · 2012. 5. 13. · 064 Finding a Number When the Percent is Known.notebook December 05, 2013 The store owner offered to order

Auto Psia 0015

Auto Psia 0015

0015 4 Concrete

0015 4 Concrete

CCF25012018 0015(1)

CCF25012018 0015(1)

Mickey 0015 1953 lacospra

Mickey 0015 1953 lacospra