Acute Stroke Imaging What Clinicians Need to Know

8
REVIEW Acute Stroke Imaging: What Clinicians Need to Know Rihan Khan, MD, Kambiz Nael, MD, William Erly, MD Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Neuroradiology, University of Arizona Medical Center, Tucson. ABSTRACT Advances in technology and software applications have contributed to new imaging modalities and strategies in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute cerebral infarction. Routine computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been the standard studies in stroke imaging, which have been complemented by CT and MR angiography, diffusion-weighted MR imaging, and cerebral perfusion studies, while conventional angiography is typically reserved for intra-arterial therapy. The purpose of this article is to review the variety of imaging studies available in the acute stroke setting, and to discuss the utility of each and the pertinent associated main findings. The appropriateness of which study and when each should be ordered is also discussed. At the conclusion of this article, the reader should have a more clear understanding of the neuroimaging modalities available for acute stroke imaging. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. The American Journal of Medicine (2013) 126, 379-386 KEYWORDS: Acute stroke; CT stroke; MRI stroke; Stroke; Stroke imaging Advances in technology and neuroscience have contributed to new neuroimaging modalities and strategies in the eval- uation of patients with suspected acute cerebral infarction. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ce- rebral perfusion, and noninvasive angiography using both computed tomography (CT) and MR are widely available to supplement standard imaging techniques of MRI and CT. While beneficial to patient evaluation and management, when caring for a patient with a potential acute cerebral infarction, the multitude of diagnostic options may compli- cate the patient’s imaging evaluation. This article will de- scribe the basics of imaging studies that may be performed for a patient with a potential cerebral infarction, explain their utility, and discuss the significance of the imaging findings. NONCONTRAST HEAD CT Due to its broad availability and speed, noncontrast brain CT is considered the first line of imaging of patients with suspected acute stroke in many centers across the country. Because intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is the first-line therapy for acute ischemic infarction, potential clinical mimics of ischemia must be excluded before insti- tuting therapy. To this end, a noncontrast CT scan of the brain is per- formed to look for other causes of the new focal neurologic deficit besides ischemic disease and for any contraindica- tions to therapy. The goal is to start intravenous thrombo- lytic therapy in patients with clinical suspicion of cerebral ischemia without any contraindication. MRI is a more sen- sitive imaging modality than a noncontrast CT scan for the detection of early infarction; however, because a CT scan is quicker and much more readily available, CT is considered the first study in most centers. The CT scan is done without contrast, because a small enhancing lesion may be mistaken for an intracranial hem- orrhage. On CT, the denser the material is, the whiter it appears (eg, bone or calcium), while less dense material is darker (eg, air in the sinuses). Acute blood has the fortunate imaging property of being higher density than normal brain, so it is very conspicuous on the noncontrast CT. Incidental calcifications that may be mistaken for hemorrhage may occur in the globus pallidus, pineal gland, and the choroid plexus. If the patient presents with a new-onset focal neurologic deficit, and the CT reveals an intracranial hemorrhage, ob- Funding: None. Conflict of Interest: None. Authorship: All authors had a role in writing the manuscript. Requests for reprints should be addressed to Rihan Khan, MD, Depart- ment of Medical Imaging, Division of Neuroradiology, University of Arizona Medical Center, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85724. E-mail address: [email protected] 0002-9343/$ -see front matter © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.11.014

description

stroke

Transcript of Acute Stroke Imaging What Clinicians Need to Know

  • REVIEW

    A ClinRihDe rsity o

    s haveectedg (MRd MR

    angioarietyrtinentalso de neur

    erican

    ke; Str

    Adtoua

    Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ce-rebral perfusion,computed tomogrsupplement standWhile beneficialwhen caring forinfarction, the mucate the patientsscribe the basicsfor a patient wittheir utility, andfindings.

    NONCONTRASTDue to its broadCT is considered the first line of imaging of patients with

    sus

    Betheclinical mimics of ischemia must be excluded before insti-

    brain is per-l neurologicontraindica-us thrombo-

    of cerebrala more sen-

    scan for thea CT scan iss considered

    use a smallcranial hem-he whiter it

    appears (eg, bone or calcium), while less dense material isdarker (eg, air in the sinuses). Acute blood has the fortunate

    plexus.If the patient presents with a new-onset focal neurologic

    deficit, and the CT reveals an intracranial hemorrhage, ob-

    ment of Medical Imaging, Division of Neuroradiology, University ofArizona Medical Center, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ85724.

    E-mail address: [email protected]

    0002-9343/$ -see front matter 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.11.014imaging property of being higher density than normal brain,so it is very conspicuous on the noncontrast CT. Incidentalcalcifications that may be mistaken for hemorrhage mayoccur in the globus pallidus, pineal gland, and the choroid

    Funding: None.Conflict of Interest: None.Authorship: All authors had a role in writing the manuscript.Requests for reprints should be addressed to Rihan Khan, MD, Depart-and noninvasive angiography using bothaphy (CT) and MR are widely available toard imaging techniques of MRI and CT.to patient evaluation and management,a patient with a potential acute cerebralltitude of diagnostic options may compli-imaging evaluation. This article will de-

    of imaging studies that may be performedh a potential cerebral infarction, explaindiscuss the significance of the imaging

    HEAD CTavailability and speed, noncontrast brain

    tuting therapy.To this end, a noncontrast CT scan of the

    formed to look for other causes of the new focadeficit besides ischemic disease and for any ctions to therapy. The goal is to start intravenolytic therapy in patients with clinical suspicionischemia without any contraindication. MRI issitive imaging modality than a noncontrast CTdetection of early infarction; however, becausequicker and much more readily available, CT ithe first study in most centers.

    The CT scan is done without contrast, becaenhancing lesion may be mistaken for an intraorrhage. On CT, the denser the material is, tcute Stroke Imaging: Whatan Khan, MD, Kambiz Nael, MD, William Erly, MD

    partment of Medical Imaging, Division of Neuroradiology, Unive

    ABSTRACT

    Advances in technology and software applicationstrategies in the evaluation of patients with susptomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaginimaging, which have been complemented by CT anand cerebral perfusion studies, while conventionaltherapy. The purpose of this article is to review the vsetting, and to discuss the utility of each and the peof which study and when each should be ordered isreader should have a more clear understanding of thimaging. 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. The AmKEYWORDS: Acute stroke; CT stroke; MRI stroke; Stro

    vances in technology and neuroscience have contributednew neuroimaging modalities and strategies in the eval-tion of patients with suspected acute cerebral infarction.icians Need to Know

    f Arizona Medical Center, Tucson.

    contributed to new imaging modalities andacute cerebral infarction. Routine computedI) have been the standard studies in stroke

    angiography, diffusion-weighted MR imaging,graphy is typically reserved for intra-arterialof imaging studies available in the acute strokeassociated main findings. The appropriatenessiscussed. At the conclusion of this article, theoimaging modalities available for acute stroke

    Journal of Medicine (2013) 126, 379-386oke imaging

    pected acute stroke in many centers across the country.cause intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) isfirst-line therapy for acute ischemic infarction, potential

  • viobloorr

    difinfinfear

    phspoCTdistheOnme

    lesrea

    cer

    ve

    bratabun

    pewa

    celofagThcau

    larAnsigpaizaoldtiafrewhmi

    are

    (Fabhigarton

    bo

    su

    the

    reled

    teran

    prepacan

    arthathrsm

    CANC

    rst econ

    bral amputresonfor cn, artabno

    an beasse

    e infa

    ograparteri

    380 The American Journal of Medicine, Vol 126, No 5, May 2013usly they are not a candidate for thrombolysis. If nood is seen on the noncontrast CT, an intracranial hem-hage is excluded, but ischemic disease is still in theferential diagnosis. Early on in the course of an ischemicarct, the head CT scan may look normal. Signs of earlyarction that may indicate anly ischemic stroke include:

    the insular ribbon sign;the basal ganglia sign;global loss of gray-white differ-entiation;mild sulcal effacement; andthe dense middle cerebral artery(MCA) or dense basilar arterysign.

    A brief digression into theysical principles that are re-nsible for the changes in thescan as a result of ischemic

    ease will make understandingsigns of early infarction easier.e of the first concepts to re-mber is that water (serum) iss dense than cellular materialdily confirmed comparing theebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the

    ntricles to the surroundingin. As a result of hypoperfusion, cellular oxidative me-olism decreases or completely stops, rendering the cellable to produce adenosine triphosphate (ATP). ATP-de-ndent membrane transport terminates and the net effect ister being drawn into and becoming trapped within thel. As the cellular water content increases, the CT densitythe affected tissues decreases, in a type of visual aver-

    ing of the normal brain parenchyma with the black CSF.e insular ribbon sign (Figure 1A) results from edemasing a loss of gray-white differentiation within the insu-cortex. This region is sensitive to early ischemic disease.alogous to the insular ribbon sign is the basal ganglian (Figure 1B) in which there is edema of the globusllidus, putamen, or caudate nucleus, and a loss of visual-tion of these structures. In the case of a large or slightlyer infarction, one may see a loss of gray-white differen-

    tion throughout the affected area (Figure 1C). This isquently associated with effacement of the adjacent sulci,ich is reflective of the cellular edema and development ofld regional mass effect.In contrast to the decreased density of the affectedas of the brain described previously, the dense MCA

    igure 2A) or dense basilar artery signs are areas ofnormal increased density within the vessel lumen. Theh density corresponds to thrombus lodged within theery and has been shown to occur in up to one third toe half of patients with angiographically proven throm-

    CLINICAL SIGNIFI

    In acute stroke, finial hemorrhage, athrombolysis.

    Cervical and cereevaluated with co(CT) or magneticgiography to lookstenosis, dissectioand other vascular

    Perfusion studies ceither CT or MR topenumbra and cor

    Conventional angireserved for intra-sis.1,2 It is therefore useful when seen, but CT is not siofficiently sensitive to exclude a proximal thrombus ifdense vessel is not seen.

    After around 6 hours, ischemic tissue becomes moreiably visibly evident as the affected tissue becomes moreematous. Studies have shown that the area of hypodensity

    seen on noncontrast CT correlateswith infarcted tissue. When eval-uating the CT scan at presentation,when an MCA territory infarctionis suspected, it is important to ob-serve how much of the territory isinvolved, as involvement of 1/3of the MCA territory is associatedwith an increased risk of bleedwith thrombolysis,3 while in-volvement of 1/2 of the MCAterritory is associated with brainherniation.4 Hence, there is the con-traindication to tPA when more than1/3 of the MCA territory is involvedon noncontrast CT.

    Mass effect from an infarctiontypically peaks around 3-5 days.Acute infarcts also may undergohemorrhagic conversion, which iscommonly thought to representreperfusion injury into severelyischemic tissue via recanalized ar-

    ies or via collateral flow. Lastly, after weeks to months,infarct evolves to its chronic state (Figure 1D), when

    ema is long gone and volume loss is clearly evidentcephalomalacia).

    ANGIOGRAPHY OF THE HEAD AND NECKcerebral ischemia is suspected after the initial CT scan,aluation of the status of the neck and brain arterial vas-lature is recommended. CT angiography (CTA) is muchre readily available than magnetic resonance angiogra-

    y (MRA), with diagnostic accuracy approaching that ofnventional angiography. A relatively small bolus of in-venous contrast is given, and with modern CT scanners,ombined CTA of the head and neck can be performed

    th one contrast injection.Significant findings on the CTA of the neck includeh-grade arterial stenosis (Figure 2B), occlusion, or dis-tion. Plaque ulceration also may be seen from a rupturedque. In the intracranial vasculature, areas of stenosis and

    clusion also may be seen, and sometimes the clinicalsentation points to an area of high clinical suspicion in a

    rticular vascular territory. Focal areas of intraluminal clotbe seen outlined by contrast, in the form of either

    erial stenosis or complete occlusion (Figure 2C). CTAs been shown to be sensitive for detection of intracranialombus in the large arteries, but not for the more distal,aller branches.4 Once identified, proximal branch occlu-

    E

    xclude intracra-traindication to

    rteries can beed tomographyance (MR) an-lot, significanterial occlusion,rmalities.

    performed withss for ischemicrct.

    hy is typicallyal therapy.ed(en

    CTIfev

    cu

    mo

    phco

    traa c

    wi

    higsec

    plaocns may lead to intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy or

  • me

    thrmo

    co

    on

    facbedoare

    381Khan et al Acute Stroke Imagingchanical thrombectomy, as opposed to intravenousombolysis, given that intra-arterial thrombolysis may bere efficacious in treating proximal large vessel occlusion

    mpared with intravenous thrombolysis.5 The time fromset of symptoms to initiation of treatment also is a majortor, as intra-arterial thrombolysis and mechanical throm-

    ctomy have longer window periods for treatment thanes intravenous thrombolysis. Less commonly, multifocal

    Figure 1 Signs of early infarct comparedNotice the small focal area of low density inrelative to the posterior aspect (arrows). (B)low density throughout the right basal ganglleft basal ganglia maintain their normal higinfarct, left middle cerebral artery territory.with well-delineated borders. In this case, nobasal ganglia are not. (D) Chronic infarct in lfrom cerebrospinal fluid replacing the infarcventricle. An acute to subacute ischemic inalso is seen on the right side.as of arterial narrowing may suggest vasculitis, but this strgnosis can be more sensitively assessed in the clinicalntext of systemic disease.Besides visualizing the arterial vasculature, the CTArce images (CTA-SI) are very useful as they reflectod volume.5 With contrast, normal brain tissue will en-

    nce while areas of infarction will not, thus making thearcted tissue more apparent, even more than on the con-rrent noncontrast head CT. Size of the infarct as demon-

    hronic infarct: (A) Insular ribbon sign.terior portion of the insular gray matterganglia sign. Notice the subtle uniformll arrows), while the gray nuclei of thensity (large arrows). (C) Acute large

    ubtle loss of gray white differentiationw the insular ribbon is involved, but theietal lobe (arrow). Note the low densityin and dilation of the ipsilateral lateralat underwent hemorrhagic conversiondiaco

    sou

    blohainfcu

    with cthe anBasalia (smaher de

    Note stice hoeft parted brafarct thated on CTA-SI has been shown to closely parallel the

  • sizbedesm

    fos

    whve

    trashoadna

    thethe

    CTAor

    diffrosam

    an

    haiscab

    pe(C(Msta

    farforbraMTit s

    F erebras ghter tte phy ans erosclere id tom

    382 The American Journal of Medicine, Vol 126, No 5, May 2013e of infarct on follow-up CT.4 CTA-SI has been shown tocomparable to diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the

    tection of ischemic regions, with DWI better at detectingall infarcts and those in the brainstem and posteriorsa.6,7Pitfalls to watch for include a suboptimal contrast bolus,ich may warrant a repeat examination, and significant

    nous contamination. Also remember that vascular con-st may have a nephrotoxic effect. Radiology departmentsuld have a protocol in place for how to deal with contrast

    ministration in the setting of poor renal function. Alter-tively a noncontrast MRA could be performed to evaluate

    head and neck, or an ultrasound examination to evaluatecarotid bifurcations.

    PERFUSIONCT perfusion study can be performed to look for ischemiainfarct, as the clinical neurologic examination cannotferentiate the nonfunctioning reversibly ischemic tissuem irreversibly infarcted tissue. This can be done at thee time as a CTA study by adding a second contrast bolus

    d repeating the scan, tracking changes in cerebral en-ncement over time. This allows for assessment of thehemic penumbra, which is the area of potentially salvage-le tissue ischemia surrounding an area of core infarct.Although more maps are now available, the key basic

    rfusion maps to focus on are: cerebral blood volumeBV), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and mean transit timeTT). The key to understanding these maps is an under-

    igure 2 Vascular abnormalities to look for: (A) Dense middle cegment related to clot. This density was focal and significantly brimporal subacute infarct. (B) Severe stenosis. Computed tomogra

    tenosis at the origin of the left internal carotid artery related to athformatted image from head CTA shows an abrupt cutoff of the more distal branches is related to collateral flow.nding of the physiologic principals of ischemia and in- scaction. Ischemic brain has reduced blood flow and there-e it takes longer for the blood to get through the affectedin (Figure 3), resulting in decreased CBF and increasedT. CBV remains near normal in ischemic brain becausetill has some blood flowing through it, which is enoughkeep the tissue alive but not enough for normal function.Like ischemic brain, the infarcted brain will have anvated MTT and decreased CBF. The distinguishing fea-e that allows differentiation of ischemic brain from in-cted brain is the CBV: there is no blood volume in thearcted brain.The color assignments regarding increased and de-ased flow vary from center to center. A color scale isnted along the side of the images to indicate what colorsresent increased or decreased flow, transit time, or vol-e. Symmetry is key to interpretationif the examination

    symmetric on all 3 maps, either the examination is nor-l, or there are bilateral symmetric areas of ischemia orarction.A major pitfall with CT perfusion with most current CTnners is that the entire brain is not scanned during thedy. Even with a 64-slice CT scanner, only 4 or 5 slices

    typically obtained, centered at the level of the basalnglia where the anterior, middle, and posterior cerebralscular territories can be assessed. If a small infarct issent in an area of the brain that was not imaged, it willmissed. Some people therefore advocate repeating thedy at a different location. Alternatively, techniques haveen devised to move the table back and forth during the

    l artery sign. High density is present in the proximal right M1han the other arteries. Also note the areas of right frontal andgiography (CTA) coronal reformatted image shows a severerotic plaque build-up (arrow). (C) Arterial occlusion. Coronaldistal left M1 segment (arrow). Contrast opacification of theto

    eleturfarinf

    cre

    prirepum

    isma

    inf

    sca

    stuare

    gava

    prebestuben, which helps to increase coverage. Some of the newest

  • CTtabati(olan

    ma

    tio

    MRMRcu

    iminfBeATbramu

    Sowihigshico

    ficADpa4AthaFoplaco

    scr

    wo

    F blood vis ntal reg(M spectivz infarca

    383Khan et al Acute Stroke Imagingscanners can scan the entire brain without moving thele (320 slices), but they are not yet prevalent. Consider-on also must be given to patients with preexisting diseased infarct, brain tumor); the perfusion study will be alteredd one must take care to consider this when evaluating theps. As with CTA, because contrast is given, renal func-n should be considered.

    II may be performed after any of the previously dis-

    ssed CT scans, and in some instances may be the firstaging test performed. In evaluation of suspected cerebralarction, the key sequence to be familiar with is DWI.cause this image set is a map of water motion, when theP-dependent membrane pumps stop working in infarctedin, water becomes trapped within the cell, resulting inch higher signal than from the background tissues.metimes, areas that are bright on T2-weighted imagesth normal diffusion properties will show up as relativelyh signal areas on the DWI (a phenomenon known as T2ne-through). The high signal area on the DWI must berrelated with the finding on the apparent diffusion coef-ient (ADC) map. Acute infarct will appear dark on theC map, confirming restricted diffusion. So the overall

    ttern to look for is: bright on DWI, dark on ADC (Figure, B). It also is important to remember that not everythingt shows restricted diffusion represents acute infarction.r example, pyogenic abscesses and highly cellular neo-sms also may show restricted diffusion, so the clinical

    ntext and the remainder of the imaging study need to beutinized.Because the ATP-dependent membrane pumps stop

    igure 3 Computed tomography perfusion ischemia. Cerebraldecreased in a wedge-shaped area that is more blue in the left froTT) in the same area that is more red and yellow (C). Note the re

    ero and red represents the maximum value of the scale. If this wererea as in the CBF and MTT maps.Figure 4 Magnetic resonance image (MRI) of acute infarct.(A) Bright signal on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) withcorresponding matching low signal on the apparent diffusioncoefficient (ADC) map (B) indicates restricted diffusion fromacute infarct. This is the MRI that corresponds to the computedtomography (CT) scan in Figure 1C. (C) Coronal gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiogram from aortic arch tojust above the circle of Willis shows a proximal left middlecerebral artery occlusion (arrow). (D) Infarct underwent hem-rking nearly immediately, acute infarction will showoolume (CBV) map (A) is normal. Cerebral blood flow (CBF)ion (B) with corresponding prolongation of mean transit timee color scales to the side of each image, where blue represents

    t, the CBV map would show a similar abnormal wedge-shapedrrhagic conversion by day 2 as shown on head CT scan.

  • res

    Thpasca

    shofirscloMRthesca

    deCTdif

    desioinfadstrfarca

    infoc

    ce

    whon

    Aftat

    theeqmiintoua

    su

    artblointblo

    ma

    inathene

    inf

    MRInsu

    plebehisstrare

    wi

    oc

    timen

    isen

    mo

    mo

    shinstefelMinctroqucro

    fligva

    we

    setlar(Fare

    MRMRagtreare

    peva

    opsugfarres

    terfusfusan

    todyacc

    wi

    siciscno

    CBsioinen

    thepe

    384 The American Journal of Medicine, Vol 126, No 5, May 2013tricted diffusion within 30 minutes of the initial event.e practical implication of this is that by the time anytient gets to the emergency department and placed in thenner, virtually everyone with an acute infarct shouldw changes on the DWI sequence. Why not go to MRIt? Some large institutions that have their MRI scannerse to the emergency department and have 24/7 in-house

    technician coverage may do that to simply answer ifre is an infarct or not. However, often a noncontrast CTn is still performed to rule out a bleed because the high

    nsity of blood makes its presence very recognizable on, and detecting acute hemorrhage on MRI can beficult.Infarcts will vary in shape and size, depending on thegree of arterial involvement. Proximal branch occlu-ns, such as the M1 segment of the MCA, can causearction of the entire MCA territory if there is notequate collateral circulation. Smaller, more down-eam branch occlusions will cause subterritorial in-cts, while tiny clots (as with embolic disease) willuse terminal branch occlusions and small associatedarcts. Embolic infarcts are suspected when infarctscur in more than one vascular territory: MCA, anteriorrebral artery, or posterior cerebral artery. Ultimately,en an infarct has evolved to the chronic stage, just asCT, there will be volume loss and encephalomalacia.

    ter infarcted tissue is resorbed, CSF fills in the cavi-ed area that follows fluid signal intensity on MRI.Regarding the exclusion of intracranial hemorrhage inhyperacute stroke patient, MRI appears to be at least

    ual to CT. Gradient-recalled-echo images can detectcrohemorrhages, both old and new, better than CT, andparticular, 5 microhemorrhages have not been shownbe a contraindication to thrombolysis. The fluid-atten-ted inversion recovery sequence can be used to detectbarachnoid hemorrhage, but may be associated withifacts at the skull base that mimic subarachnoidod.5 Hyperoxygenation also can cause high signalensity in the CSF spaces that mimics subarachnoidod.8Some contraindications to MRI include cardiac pace-ker, metal in the eye, inability to fit in the scanner, and anbility to stay still. The latter is particularly problematic inpatient with acute mental status change. Contrast is not

    cessary for this part of the examination to rule out acutearct.

    A HEAD AND NECKmany institutions, MRA is more often done in the

    bacute setting, after the initial stroke work-up is com-te and the tPA window has passed. This is simply

    cause MRI is usually not as readily available and hastorically taken longer than CT, although new MRoke protocols performed at certain acute stroke centers

    approaching CT in regards to time. Nevertheless, as

    th CT, the arteries are assessed for significant stenosis, areclusion, and dissection. Noncontrast (2-dimensionale of flight, 3-dimensional time of flight) or contrast-

    hanced MRA techniques can be performed, and whichutilized typically depends on local radiologist prefer-ce. However, contrast-enhanced MRA is thought to bere accurate in imaging extracranial stenosis and vesselrphology than nonenhanced MRA techniques, and

    ows general agreement with conventional angiography85%-90% of cases, as does CTA.5 For intracranialnosis, CTA and conventional angiography have beent to be more accurate than MRA.5 Due to advances inRI, contrast-enhanced MRA of the supra-aortic arteriesluding the neck and brain can be obtained with iso-pic submillimeter voxel size with high diagnosticality and excellent intermodality agreement with otherss-sectional techniques such as CTA and time-of-ht MRA.9,10 In addition to depiction of the cervical

    sculature, the large, proximal intracranial vessels arell seen, which is of particular use in the acute stroketing. Interventionalists look for thrombus in thesege vessels when considering intra-arterial therapyigure 4C), not in the smaller more distal vessels, which

    not as well resolved.

    PERFUSIONperfusion has been incorporated into acute stroke im-

    ing in many large stroke centers where interventionalatment options such as intra-arterial tPA and clot retrieval

    available.11,12 The goal of MR perfusion is to detectrfusion-diffusion mismatch with the implication of sal-geable tissue that can benefit from further therapeutictions. Over the last decade, several clinical trials havegested that patients with a mismatch between their in-

    ction volume and the volume of hypoperfused tissue maypond to reperfusion therapies.11-13Commonly used MR perfusion techniques, including ar-ial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast per-ion, have been long used for evaluation of cerebral per-ion in patients with stroke, each with different strengths

    d limitations.14,15 Faster image acquisition and the abilitygenerate perfusion maps in a few minutes have madenamic susceptibility contrast a more robust and widelyepted technique to measure cerebral perfusion in patients

    th acute stroke.Although the technique is significantly different, the ba-premise of MR perfusion is similar to CT perfusion:

    hemic brain has increased MTT, decreased CBF, andrmal CBV; infarcted brain has increased MTT, decreasedF, and markedly decreased to no CBV. As in CT perfu-n, in MR perfusion it is the presence or absence of bloodthe brain parenchyma (CBV) that allows one to differ-tiate ischemic from infarcted brain. DWI is used to assess

    core area of infarct (similar to CBV), while specificrfusion-weighted images (ie, MTT, CBF) represent the

    a of ischemia. When there is an abnormal area of perfu-

  • sio(D

    COSUCodaeas

    sivaboc

    spegreatideinpaeas

    an

    int

    COThthepeas

    shostrho

    strwo

    Re1.

    (

    ngior thera

    based oRA but

    e

    g flowCT a

    385Khan et al Acute Stroke Imagingn that is greater than the area of abnormal diffusionWI), there is an ischemic penumbra.

    NVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY (AKA, DIGITALBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY)nventional angiography is still considered the gold stan-rd for the detection of cervical and cerebrovascular dis-e and is particularly important when considering inva-e therapies. It also can provide valuable informationout collateral flow, perfusion status, and may detect othercult vascular lesions. The resolution, sensitivity, andcificity of conventional angiography is equal to orater than that of noninvasive techniques.6 Although rel-

    vely safe, there is a chance of permanent neurologicalficit, including death, due to the presence of the catheterthe carotid artery. In experienced hands, this is 1%. Inrt because of this and the ready availability and relativee of use of the noninvasive techniques, conventional

    giography is typically reserved for cases that may requirera-arterial treatment.

    NCLUSIONis article reviewed the many imaging studies available inacute stroke setting. The utility of each study and the

    rtinent main findings associated with each were reviewed,was the appropriateness of which study and when eachuld be ordered. A suggested imaging algorithm for acute

    oke patients also is presented (Figure 5). The authors

    CT without contrast(most instuons)

    CTA Head & Neck

    CT Perfusion of Head

    Convenonal A(usually reserved fo

    *many radiologists feel more condent excluding blood**for those radiologists who prefer CTA to M

    Strok

    *

    **

    Figure 5 Suggested acute stroke imaginMRImagnetic resonance imaging; CTApe that our readers have a more clear understanding ofoke imaging that will translate into a tailored imagingrkup.

    ferencesHacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis withrecombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemisphericstroke. The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS).JAMA. 1995;274:1017-1025.Lev MH, Farkas J, Rodriguez VR, et al. CT angiography in the rapidtriage of patients with hyperacute stroke to intraarterial thrombolysis:accuracy in the detection of large vessel thrombus. J Comput AssistTomogr. 2001;25:520-528.Tomsick TA, Brott TG, Barsan W, et al. Prognostic value of thehyperdense middle cerebral artery sign and stroke scale score beforeultraearly thrombolytic therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17:79-85.Flacke S, Urbach H, Keller E, et al. Middle cerebral artery (MCA)susceptibility sign at susceptibility-based perfusion MR imaging: clin-ical importance and comparison with hyperdense MCA sign at CT.Radiology. 2000;215:476-482.Schramm P, Schellinger PD, Fieback JB, et al. Comparison of CT andCT angiography source images with diffusion-weighted imaging inpatients with acute stroke within 6 hours after onset. Stroke. 2002;33:2426-2432.Schramm P, Schellinger PD, Klotz E, et al. Comparison of perfusioncomputed tomography and computed tomography angiography sourceimages with perfusion-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted im-aging in patients with acute stroke of less than 6 hours duration. Stroke.2004;35:1652-1658.Latchaw R, Alberts MJ, Lev M, et al. Recommendations for imagingof acute ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the AmericanHeart Association. Stroke. 2009;40:3646-3678.Barkovich AJ. Techniques and Methods in Pediatric Neuroimaging.In: Pediatric Neuroimaging, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams& Wilkins; 2005:3.Nael K, Villablanca JP, Pope WB, et al. Supraaortic arteries: contrast-

    MRI without contrastsome instuons with MRI and tech

    coverage readily available 24/7)

    MRA Head & Neck

    MR Perfusion of Head(includes DWI if not already done)

    grampeucs)

    n CT and will then use the MR paradigmwant to ulize MR Perfusion

    chart. CT computed tomography;ngiography; MRAMR angiography.2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    6.

    7.

    8.

    9.

    enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 Thighly accelerated parallel ac-

  • quisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field ofview. Radiology. 2007;242(2):600-609.

    10. Villablanca JP, Nael K, Habibi R, Nael A, Laub G, Finn JP. 3 Tcontrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation ofthe intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic res-onance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiogra-phy. Invest Radiol. 2006;41(11):799-805.

    11. Hacke W, Albers G, Al-Rawi Y, et al. The Desmoteplase in AcuteIschemic Stroke trial (DIAS): a phase II MRI-based 9-hour windowacute stroke thrombolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase. Stroke.2005;36(1):66-73.

    12. Albers GW, Thijs VN, Wechsler L, et al. Magnetic resonance imagingprofiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the diffusion and

    perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution(DEFUSE) study. Ann Neurol. 2006;60(5):508-17.

    13. Davis SM, Donnan GA, Parsons MW, et al. Effects of alteplasebeyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging ThrombolyticEvaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial.Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(4):299-309.

    14. Sorensen AG, Buonanno FS, Gonzalez RG, et al. Hyperacute stroke:evaluation with combined multisection diffusion-weighted and hemo-dynamically weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology. 1996;199(2):391-401.

    15. Siewert B, Schlaug G, Edelman RR, et al. Comparison of EPISTARand T2*-weighted gadolinium-enhanced perfusion imaging in patientswith acute cerebral ischemia. Neurology. 1997;48(3):673-679.

    386 The American Journal of Medicine, Vol 126, No 5, May 2013

    Acute Stroke Imaging: What Clinicians Need to KnowNoncontrast Head CTCT Angiography of the Head and NeckCT PerfusionMriMRA Head and NeckMR PerfusionConventional Angiography (aka, Digital Subtraction Angiography)ConclusionReferences