Activities at LANL in the Field of High Power Superconducting Proton Linac Structures
description
Transcript of Activities at LANL in the Field of High Power Superconducting Proton Linac Structures
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 1
Activities at LANL in the Field of High Power Superconducting
Proton Linac StructuresT. Tajima and F.L. Krawczyk
Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE)LA-UR-05-3224
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 2
Outline1. Accelerator Production of Tritium (APT) Project
– 100-170 MW (1.0-1.7 GeV, 100 mA) Proton Linac– Measurements of =0.64, 5-cell 700 MHz elliptical
cavities
2. Advanced Accelerator Applications (AAA) Project (Transmutation of Nuclear Waste)
– 8 MW (600 MeV, 13.3 mA) Proton Linac– Measurements of =0.29 (ANL) and 0.175 (LANL)
spoke cavities
3. Q0 disease with low- cavities
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 3
1. Accelerator Production of Tritium (APT) Project
• Purpose: Replenish Tritium Inventory for Nuclear Weapons (3 kg/year)
• Method: Using spallation neutrons produced by a proton accelerator, split Lithium into Tritium and Helium.
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 4
700 MHz SRF Section Specs 0.64 0.82Eacc (MV/m) 5.5 4.1 (6.4)
Real estate Eacc 1.54 1.26 (1.89)
Epeak (MV/m) 19.1 12.7 (19.1)
No. Cavities 90 312Aperture (cm) 13 16Aperture/(rms-beam size)
35 45
Thermal load @ 1.9 K (kW)
2.0 6.1 (9.2)
Numbers in parentheses are for 1.7 GeV case
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 5
APT = 0.64, 700 MHz, 5-Cell Cavity
Cavity length : 116 cmCell diameter : 40 cmBeam aperture : 13 cmEp/Eacc= 3.38Hp/Eacc= 69.6 Oe/(MV/m)
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 6
Facilities for SRF Activities at LANSCE
43 mHigh-pressure rinse in a clean room.
240 m2 Class-100 Clean roomUltra-pure water system with 5700 liter storage tank
Cryostat with movable radiation shield
2 Inserts for 0.96 m diameter, 3 m deep cryostat
Control, tuning
30 m
Pumps to pump down the cryostat to < 2 K
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 7
Results of 6 Prototype Cavities at 2 K. Defects, field emission and MP(?) limited performance.
Best results of all the APT 5-cell cavities (up to 1/29/01)
1.E+08
1.E+09
1.E+10
1.E+11
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Eacc (MV/m)
Q0
AES (12/21/00)@J LABAyako (9/27/00)Eleanore (12/6/00)Germaine (4/12/00)@J LABSylvia (8/3/00)@J LABSylvia (11/1/00)LANL (1/18/01)APT Spec.
Quench
Defect at the middle cell equator
=0.64
Calculated MP band by W. Hartung
APT Goal
835 Oe40 Epk
Half the cavities were measured by Jlab as well (J. Mammosser).
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 8
Fitting of an Rs-T curve with the theoretical formula gives you Rres.
In this case, Rres was determined to be 6.4 n
Cavity: Sylvia
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 9
Comparison with TESLA Cavities
• Difference of Ep/Eacc and Hp/Eacc.
• Difference of . APT(0.64) vs. TESLA (1).– It might be more susceptible to multipacting
(MP) due to the squeezed shape
63.1
6.426.69
/EH/EH
69.10.2
38.3/EE/EE
TESLAaccp
APTaccp
TESLAaccp
APTaccp
APT cavity shape is not well optimized!
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 10
Comparison with TESLA Cavities
1.E+08
1.E+09
1.E+10
1.E+11
0 10 20 30 40
Eacc* (MV/m)
Q0TESLA 500 TESLA 800
Best TESLA 9-Cell Cavity
Eacc*: Hp/Eacc=42.6 was used.
APT
APT results (Eacc) were converted to TESLA equivalent numbers for comparison.
2 K
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 11
Issues that need to be addressed
• The APT Goal was achieved, but we need to achieve higher gradients for future machines to further reduce costs.
• Q0 drops at medium and high gradient due to Multipacting (?) and Field emission.
• Measures to take– MP free design of the cavity with MP codes.– Thermometry and other diagnostics for detecting
heating spots to localize and identify the problem.– Improve contamination control during assembly to
reduce field emission due to migrated particles.
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 12
2. Advanced Accelerator Applications (AAA) Project
• Purpose: Transmutation of Nuclear Waste, i.e., reduce life of nuclear waste by about 2 orders of magnitude to <500 years.
• Method: Accelerator-Driven System.
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 13
Spoke Cavity Development for Low-Energy Sections of Proton Linacs• Studies have been
carried out at ANL since late ’80s (Jean Delayen, Ken Shepard)
• Some advantages over elliptical cavities– Compact (~1/2 diameter of
elliptical cavities for the same frequency)
– Due to the lower frequency it can be operated at 4 K
– Mechanically stable– Larger velocity acceptance
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 14
Tests on ANL = 0.29, 340 MHz, 2-gap Spoke Cavity
Cell diameter : 44.2 cmCavity length : 30 cmBeam aperture : 3.2 cm
Ep/Eacc : 3.18Hp/Eacc : 85 Oe/MV/m
Previous tests at ANL showed field emission and limited at Eacc~5 MV/m
BCP ~100 micron and 1000-psi (~70 bar) HPR in a class-100 clean room were performed at LANL
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 15
Vertical Test Results of ANL =0.29, 340 MHz, 2-Gap Spoke Cavity
ANL b=0.29 spoke cavity Q vs. Eacc
1.E+08
1.E+09
1.E+10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Eacc (MV/m)
Q0
4K Aft. Helium Process 2K Aft. Helium Process ADTF Spec.
2 K
4K
AAA Goal
Ep 40 MV/mHp 1063 Oe
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 16
AAA =0.175, 350-MHz, 2-Gap, Spoke Cavity
Cell diameter : 39.2 cmCavity length : 20 cmBeam aperture : 5 cm
Ep/Eacc : 2.82Hp/Eacc : 69 Oe/MV/m
Two cavities were fabricated at ZANON, Italy.
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 17
Vertical Test Results of LANL =0.175, 350-MHz, Spoke Cavities
With Nb blank flanges on large radial ports
The second EZ02 test was done after disassembly and high-pressure rinse.
Eacc, max = 13.5 MV/mEp, max= 38.0 MV/mHp, max = 994 Oe
Details in PAC03 Proceedings.
4 K
Thoroughly cleaned with high-pressure water rinse after BCP.
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 18
Very high gradients are not useful for low- structures due to longitudinal envelope instability [T.P. Wangler and K.R.Crandall, Spoke Cavity Workshop, Los Alamos, Oct. 7-8, 2002.]
.)sin(8
.2
)sin(2
2
332
0
2
3320
20
Periodacc Lq
mcTEE
LmcTEq
L
• Our longitudinal beam-dynamics
design approach has been to keep 0<90° and minimize the focusing period.
• The cryomodules form piecewise constant FODO lattices where each period contains one cavity and one solenoid.
• For 350-MHz proton linac in range of 0.2 to 0.5 (20 to 150 MeV) we could use cavity gradients up to about 8 MV/m without longitudinal beam-dynamics problems.
2
3
accE MaximumperiodL
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 19
Some questions that need to be answered.• What is the experimentally (practically) achievable Hp at
4 K? It has been ~1800 Oe at 2 K with TESLA cavities. (Due to the decrease of Hc with lower temperature, i.e., ~14 % from 4 K to 2 K, and the better thermal conductivity of liquid He at T<2.17 K (Lambda point), it is expected that the achievable field is higher at 2 K. )
• Are there any difference between elliptical and spoke cavities in terms of the field limitations? It has been shown for spoke cavities that the maximum fields are almost the same at 4 K and 2 K, whereas some elliptical cavities have shown much better results at 2 K than at 4K.
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 20
3. Q0 disease with low-frequency cavities (tests with 350 MHz spoke cavities)• Q0 disease is a degradation of Q0 due to niobium
hydrides (Tc~1.2 K?) precipitated on the surface from bulk during slow cooldown by holding the cavity at medium temperatures (70-150 K, worst at ~100 K). It had been said before our tests that low frequency cavities (<500 MHz) do not show it.
• A systematic Q disease tests have been carried out with our 350 MHz spoke cavities– Spoke cavities made of RRR~250 Nb.– Original H contest is unknown.– No high temperature heat treatment. (<150 °C)– Standard BCP (HF:HNO3:H3PO4=1:1:2) ~150 m at <15°C
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 21
Q disease tests with EZ01 at 4 K
1.E+08
1.E+09
1.E+10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Eacc (MV/m)
Q0
After 160-195K for 120 h12/2/02After 100 K for 13 h 12/3/02
After 100 K for 11 h (total 24 h)12/4/02After 100 K for 12 h (total 36 h)12/5/02Kept at 4 K over the weekend12/9/02After 100 K for 12 h (total 48 h)12/10/02After 100 K for 12 h (total 60 h)12/11/02After 100 K for 12 h (total 72 h)12/12/02After 100 K for 12 h (total 84 h)12/13/02Kept 100 K over the weekend12/16/02After 100 K for 12 h (total 96 h)12/17/02After 100 K for 12 h (total 108 h)12/18/02After 100 K for 12 h (total 120 h)12/19/02
Chronological order
Q0 – Eacc Curves were taken after every 12 hours of holding at 100 K
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 22
Q0 vs holding time at 100 K
0.0E+00
2.0E+08
4.0E+08
6.0E+08
8.0E+08
1.0E+09
1.2E+09
1.4E+09
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Total holding time (h)
Q0
Q0 Dependence on the Holding Time at 100 K
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 23
Increase of surface resistance (Rs) due to Q disease vs holding time at
100 K
0102030405060708090
100
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Total holding time (h)
Add
ition
al R
s (n
ohm
s)
Additional Surface Resistance Due to Q disease
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 24
Summary of the Q disease tests• With our 350-MHz spoke cavities, little Q disease occurs
after 150-m BCP, up to ~24 hours of holding time at ~100 K.
• Holding the cavity for longer time causes Q disease.
• The additional surface resistance due to the Q disease increases linearly after the increase starts.
• Q disease disappears if the cavity is warmed up to 180 K.
HPSL Workshop, Naperville, May 22-24, 2005 25
Summary• Six =0.64 700-MHz 5-cell cavities were prototyped
and all of them exceeded APT specs, but needs better design in terms of optimum Hp/Eaccand MP, and further particulate contamination control to get higher gradients
• Two =0.175 350-MHz single-spoke spoke cavities were prototyped and both of them showed similar results and exceeded AAA specs.
• It was found that Q0 disease occurs with our 350-MHz spoke cavities, but it does not occur if cooled down within 24 hours.