Active FOIUS surveillance: Shrinking the grey zone Sommerakademi … · 2016. 7. 31. · Klotz et...

18
Active surveillance: Shrinking the grey zone Sommerakademi e Munich, June 30 2016 Active surveillance: Shrinking the grey zone 3 rd FOIUS Tel Aviv, July 2016

Transcript of Active FOIUS surveillance: Shrinking the grey zone Sommerakademi … · 2016. 7. 31. · Klotz et...

  • Active

    surveillance:

    Shrinking the

    grey zone

    Sommerakademi

    e

    Munich, June 30

    2016

    Active surveillance:

    Shrinking the grey zone

    3rd FOIUS

    Tel Aviv, July 2016

  • Active Surveillance for low risk PCa

    What has changed?

    (since Klotz, Choo J Urol 167: 1664, 2002)

    • Greater recognition of overtreatment problem, acceptance of concept

    • Nature of occult high grade disease

    • Predictive value of baseline parameters

    • Flaws of PSA kinetics as trigger

    • Multiparametric MRI

    • New modelling studies

    • Randomized data on role of 5 ARIs

    • Longer follow up,, ~2000 publications

  • • Molecular genetics of Gleason pattern 3 resembles normal cells in most cases; pattern 4

    has many molecular hallmarks of cancer

    • Metastatic potential of Gleason 3 ~ zero.

    • The major limitation of current active surveillance strategies relates to pathologic miss of co-

    existent higher grade cancer

    • True biological grade progression occurs, but is uncommon

    • Pre-histologic adverse genetic alterations exist

    • MRI and molecular biomarkers enhance diagnostic accuracy (complementary)

    2016: What we know

  • Gleason 3 lacks hallmarks of cancer

    Characteristic/Pathway Gleason 3 Gleason 4

    Expression of pro-proliferation embryonic, neuronal,

    hematopoietic stem cell genes, EGF, EGFR

    No Overexpressed

    AKT pathway: MAP2K4, RALA, PHLPP, PML No Aberrant

    HER2/neu No Amplified

    Antigrowth signal insensitivity (Cyclin D2, CKDN1β) Expressed Absent

    Resisting apoptosis: DAD1 Negative Strong Exp

    BCL2 Mostly Neg. Upregulated

    Absence of senescence: TMPRSS2-ERG ERG normal Increased

    Sustained angiogenesis: VEGF Low Increased

    Expression of other pro-angiogenic factors Normal Increased

    Tissue invasion/metastasis markers (CXCR4, others) Normal Overexpressed

    PTEN loss 10% > 90%

    Clinical evidence of metastasis/mortality Absent Present

  • The clonal origin

    of lethal prostate cancer Haffner M, Yegasubramanian et al, JCI, epub Oct 29 2913

  • In Vivo Imaging Reveals Extracellular Vesicle-Mediated

    Phenocopying of Metastatic Behavior

    Zomer A, Cell 2015, 161, 1046–1057

    • Extra-cellular vesicles released by malignant tumor cells

    taken up by less malignant cells located within the same and

    within distant tumors

    • These EVs carry mRNAs involved in migration and

    metastasis.

    • The RNA from more aggressive cells is incorporated and

    induces aggressive behavior in the indolent cells

  • Toronto Surveillance Cohort

    • 993 patients, median f/u of 8.9 years (0.5 – 19.8 years)

    • Serial PSA, biopsy (no MRI until 2012)

    • 78% low risk

    • 22% patients intermediate risk (G7 or PSA > 10)

    • 38% of these < 70 years

    • Intervention for PSA DT < 3 years (until 2010), upgrading to Gleason 3 + ‘significant’ 4

    • 30 patients have developed metastases

    • 15 died of prostate cancer

    • 4 died other causes, 11 alive with mets

  • Intervention free survival in active

    surveillance Klotz et al JCO 33(3):272-7 2015

  • Survival with AS Klotz et al JCO 33(3):272-7 2015 OS

    CSS

  • OS and CSS: Low vs Intermediate risk

    (Gleason 3+4, PSA >10) 67%

    51% HR 2.13

    HR 3.75 89%

    97%

    Overall Survival

    Cause Specific Survival

  • Intermediate risk group: Baseline Gleason

    score, not PSA, predicted for mets

    Baseline PSA >10 vs GS 7, Met free survival

    77%

    93%

  • Recursive partitioning analysis: Metastasis

    free survival by risk group

  • Hopkins AS long term outcome: Overall mortality and Pca

    mortality Tosoian J, Carter B et al. JCO.2015

    ©

    Pca

    mortality

    0.5% at

    15 years

  • Sunnybrook Johns Hopkins

    Eligibility All Gleason 6, PSA

  • Active surveillance

    • Initial Bx and risk categorization

    • Comorbidity and life expectancy

    • Patient preference

    • Re—biopsy to improve accuracy of risk classification

    • Periodic re-evaluation for change in risk

    • Intervention:

    • Change in risk category

    • PSA anxiety

    • Patient preference

    • Reduce uncertainty of eligibility determination

    • MRI/biomarker instead of 2nd biopsy

    • Improved patient selection:

    • MRI negative/favorable score : The new very low risk

    • MRI target/high score: greater acceptance of treatment

    • Serial imaging/molecular monitoring with modulated interval

    • More rational decision for intervention

    Current Paradigm Image based/

    Molecular paradigm

  • PCa: Traditional large grey zone

    Gleason 6, PSA < 10 Everything else

    T1a

  • The new black, white, and grey zones

    Gleason >= 7 with

    > 10% Gleason 4

    The ‘grey zone’:

    • Extensive Gleason 6

    • Gleason 6 in men < 50 yrs

    • Gleason 7 with < 10% Gleason 4

    AS: Gleason 6,

    non-extensive

    disease, non-

    suspicious MRI, low

    PSA density

    • PiRADS 4-5 with low

    grade cancer on targeted

    biopsy,

    • high PSAD

  • • Gleason pattern 3 is a non-metastasizing lesion lacking most hallmarks of cancer

    • Presence of any Gleason 4 at baseline confers significant increased risk of metastasis at 15

    years

    • The ‘grey zone’ has shifted and shrunk

    • Small volume Gleason 6 no longer grey zone

    • Today:

    • High volume Gleason 6 in young patient

    • Gleason 3+ pattern 4 < 10%

    • Small volume Gleason 3+4 with negative MRI or genomic assay

    • Most Gleason 7 should be treated

    Conclusions: