Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing : Precise Fission Spectra

20
Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing : Precise Fission Spectra Mark Chadwick, T. Kawano, P. Talou Deputy Theoretical Division Leader, LANL Talk at IAEA Consultant’s Meeting on Prompt Fission Spectra, November 22, 2008 LA-UR-08-05602

description

LA-UR-08-05602. Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing : Precise Fission Spectra. Mark Chadwick, T. Kawano, P. Talou Deputy Theoretical Division Leader, LANL Talk at IAEA Consultant’s Meeting on Prompt Fission Spectra, November 22, 2008. Overview. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing : Precise Fission Spectra

Page 1: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing :

Precise Fission Spectra

Mark Chadwick, T. Kawano, P. Talou

Deputy Theoretical Division Leader, LANL

Talk at IAEA Consultant’s Meeting on

Prompt Fission Spectra,

November 22, 2008

LA-UR-08-05602

Page 2: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

Overview

• 4 Summary viewgraphs I presented at the IAEA/INDC meeting, on motivation for an international coordinated research effort on fission neutron spectra

• Aspects of fission neutron evaluations– Theory & Uncertainty Quantification– Experiments at LANL– Preequilibrium processes – (n,2n) dosimetry detectors - Bethe sphere testing &

critical assemblies

Page 3: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

Evaluation of Precise Fission Neutron Spectra for Actinides

Motivation:• Accurate predictions of criticality are central to many applications - reactors and waste

transmutation technologies, nonproliferation, etc• Many labs have determined that current uncertainties in the fission spectrum

represent one of the biggest sources of uncertainty in k-eff predictions (esp. recent work at LANL, Argonne/INL, Japan, Europe …)

• A new collaboration could largely reduce the spectrum uncertainties.Other background information:• Dosimetry benchmark testing suggests ENDF/B-VII (Madland’s work) high-energy

spectrum too hard for 235U,239Pu in fast neutron energy region; too soft for thermal? (Mannhart) - see later viewgraphs

• ENDF community rejected Madland’s newest 235U at thermal because of poor performance in thermal benchmarks. We need to resolve this.

• For 239Pu and 235,8U, few precise measurements exist below ~ 1 MeV emission energy, and above ~ 7 MeV emission energy. We presently rely on old models that are calibrated to the few measured data.

Page 4: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

Motivation: Jezebel keff: sensitivity to fission

spectrum (En,E’n) uncertainties in 239Pu

• Original (En,En’) matrix from ENDF/B-VII evaluation

1 deviations using Kawano’s and Livermore’s evaluated uncertainties

• PARTISN simulations of keff in Jezebel critical assembly, using all five files (including nominal)

Significant impact:

(-0.3%,+0.4%) using Kawano’s evaluated uncertainties, and (-0.35%,+0.5%) using LLNL’s.

Very big! This is one of our biggest

“levers” in predicting criticality

Also, rigorous chi covariance work done by Ishikawa et al. and ANL/Idaho groups, & Capote, Trkov, etc

Page 5: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

Initial uncertainties in fission spectra (propagated relative to ENDF/B-VII)

LANL has nearly completed a new estimate

of these uncertainties (Talou et al.)

~7%

~20-30%

Page 6: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

Possible Scope of a Future Int. Collaboration

• Goal - new evaluated fission spectrum data for major actinides, with reduce uncertainties, available for possible adoption by worldwide evaluated data projects

• Develop new theoretical methods for fission spectra. Build on historic approach, to use insights from recent advances in many Laboratories

• Utilzie new covariance data capabilities being established to best evaluate the new fission spectra and their uncertainties

• Utilize new measurements that may become available. e.g. Hampsch, Kornilov etc, and FIGARO/LANSCE

• Include significant validation benchmark testing– Criticality– Reaction rate dosimetry for (n,2n) and (n,p) detectors– Pulsed sphere transmission

Page 7: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

LANL T-16 Nuclear Reaction Codes Underpin our ENDF/B Evaluations

• GNASH - reactions on actinides & medium mass nuclides– Hauser-Feshbach, preequilibrium, & fission modeling– McGNASH = modern version

• CoH suite of codes– Another Hauser-Feshbach code, with width fluctuation treatment, and gamma-ray capture

formalism using direct-semidirect theory – Implements Kerman’s KKM theory for deformed nuclei

• Moller structure codes: fiss. barriers, g.s. masses, Q-values, & deformations.

• Preequilibrium codes– FKK, NWY quantum treatments with RPA collectivity– Semiclassical HMS and exciton options

• EDA for light nucleus reactions (R-matrix theory)

• NJOY - data processing for application codes (+kerma, damage, scattering kernels, doppler, covariances in the ERRORJ module)

Then LANL transport codes MCNP & PARTISN use the ENDF/B data

Page 8: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

Slide 8

New Work on Predicting Prompt Fission Neutrons Spectrum & Uncertainties with Kalman Code

• We have written a modern code implementing the Los Alamos model (Madland & Nix, basis for ENDF/B-VII evaluations)

• We’re refining the physics

Uncertainty Quantification:

PFNS Model constraints + Experiment + KALMAN

Page 9: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

New Experimental ProgramFIGARO @ LANSCE (Haight, Noda)

• Neutrons spallation source at WNR/LANSCE

• FIGARO array of 20 liquid scintillators

• Incident neutron energies:En=1 to 200 MeV

Slide 9

Precise fission results from LANL-LLNL-CEA program in fission, experiment & theory, expected in 2012-2015 timeframe

Preliminary data from LANSCE/WNR

Page 10: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

Program of fission neutron output measurements continues – Haight presentation at APS/DN ’08

• Reduce background from accidental coincidences– Came from neutron scattering on backing

foils – 0.12 mm Pt– Presently we are using a much better

chamber• Measure fission neutrons below 1 MeV

– Need better n-gamma discrimination– A 0.5 MeV n+235U expt planned, but

requires much beam time• Measure fission neutrons better above 8

MeV– Better timing on fission chamber (LLNL-LANL

collaboration)– More efficient neutron detectors (larger solid

angle for detection)• Quantify uncertainties better ENDF• More isotopes – 235U, 239Pu, 238U, 237Np, 240-

244Pu, etc.

Fission Neutron Spectrainduced by 2 - 3 MeV neutrons

1.E-02

1.E-01

1.E+00

1.E+01

1.E+02

1.E+03

1.E+04

1.E+05

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

E-fission neutron (MeV)

Yie

ld /

MeV

(ar

b.

no

rm)

239Pu 2-3 MeV

235U 2-3 MeV

Ratio Pu/U

ENDF - 239Pu

ENDF - 235U

ENDF Ratio 239Pu/235U

Page 11: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

Next Viewgraphs: High Emission Energy Tails of Spectra: Fission & Inelas./Preequilibrium Scattering

Impacts:• Criticality (though the region below 1 MeV ~ more important)• (n,2n) detector response – in LANL Crit assemblies, Bethe spheres • Neutron leakage, e.g. Livermore pulsed spheres

1 MeV n+ 239Pu: Fission Spectrum 14 MeV n+ 239Pu: All outgoing neutrons

Page 12: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

LANL Fast Critical Assemblies, Einc~ 0.5-2 MeV(n,2n) Dosimetry Activations for Testing High Energy Tail of Fission Neutrons

• LANL’s fast critical assembly data (Einc ~ 1 MeV) analogous to Mannhart’s work for thermal 235U fission spectrum testing

• Data available for fast systems: Godiva (235U), Jezebel (239Pu) assemblies, + others (Flattops, etc)

• Measurements available for various (n,2n) dosimetry reactions, on: 89Y, 169Tm, 191Ir, 197Au, 90Zr, 238U, 58Ni, …

• Some preliminary testing of ENDF/B-VII (see Nucl.Data. Sheets 108, No 12, 2716 (2007) )- 239Pu (Jezebel): Tm and Ir suggest spectrum > 8 MeV ~ 10-33% too high

- 235U (Flattop-25): Tm and Ir suggest spectrum > 8 MeV ~ 4-25% too high

Slide 12

This analysis needs:a) Extending to include other dosimetry reactionsb) Careful inclusion of other uncertainties, eg n2n

cross section uncertainties

Page 13: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

Assemblies with 14 MeV ( and fission multiplied ~ 1 MeV) Neutrons: Bethe Spheres - Reaction rates for (n,2n) Y, Tm, Ir, … dosimeters measured in the neutron flux

1970s experiments, that we simulate with MCNP using ENDF data• 14 MeV source surrounded by Li-D and by uranium• Complements our critical assembly data testing

Page 14: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

Dosimetry n,2n testing: 14 MeV dominated fluences look good; But problems with assemblies involving Uranium

Results for cases with uranium appear too high

No uranium: look good to ~ 6%

Measure of the neutron energy spectrum

hardness at a particular location 14-MeV-like Fiss-spec-like

Page 15: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

Suggests a Deficiency in the ENDF/B-VII Modeled 14 MeV Inelastic Scattering (Fission and/or Preeq)

n2n product = fluence * n,2n cross section.

Possible problem with 9-12 MeV fluence:-prompt fiss spec?-Preeq/inelastic?

Motivates future work on 235U 14 MeV induced Prompt-spectra and preeq/inelastic scattering

MCNP simulation of neutron spec. in LiD-U sphere

14 MeV 235U(n,xn) spec. in ENDF/B-VII

Page 16: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

Assessment of ENDF/B-VII.0 Library @ 14 MeV. Preequilibrium Needs Including in Fission Spectrum.

• To date, preequilibrium neutron scattering component of fission spectrum has been ignored in US

Slide 16

New Work at LANL (Kawano):

• spectrum shape is modified• non-isotropic angular distribution• Impacts production of (n,2n) products

Schematicn,2n

238U + n at 14 MeV

Page 17: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

Current & Future Work:Going beyond the Los Alamos model

• Monte Carlo simulation of the Fission Fragments Evaporation StageDetailed view of the processAssessment of specific physical quantities, e.g., P(n), correlations, …

Slide 17

Pre-equilibrium Neutronswith McGNASH reaction code

Page 18: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

14MeV ENDF/B-VII Modeling of Preequilibrium &Collective Inelastics - 2 Pieces of Information Guided Us

“Fundamental” differential dataMeasured data for 238U used to calibrate preequilibrium/collective model - then also used for 235U and 239Pu

“Integra transmission data”, LivermoreFor 238U 235U and 239Pu, used to validate preequilibrium/collective modeling

Page 19: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

Preequilibrium & Inelastic Scattering: For ENDF/B-VII, Young & Chadwick Implemented a Phenomenological Model

Continuum preequilibrium model based on DWBA scattering to collective states in the continuum, inferred from 238U data of Baba. New spectrum measurements from LANSCE/GEANIE needed

Resulting spectrum is much harder than previous evaluations.Although the agreement with pulsed sphere data is “good”, present accuracy is possible no better than +/- 25%

Page 20: Actinide ENDF/B-VII Cross Section Evaluations & Validation Testing  : Precise Fission Spectra

Underestimate high emission energy data - collective states may be present in the target excitations, observed in other targets (208Pb and 90Zr). We are developing an RPA capability to model collective states

New Microscopic Calculation of Direct and Pre-equilibrium Neutron Emission: M. Dupuis, T. Kawano, L. Bonneau: More Work Needed

No “ad-hoc” adjustment Structure from HF calculations with a Skyrme effective interaction (reproduces g.s. properties of major stable nuclei). Effective interaction between the projectile and target nucleons: in-medium 2-body force from bare nucleon-nucleon interaction, reproduce scattering data.