ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS
description
Transcript of ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS
![Page 1: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTIONWITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE
AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS
TECHNIQUE AND LONG TERM OUTCOME
M. Kerboull
![Page 2: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
In the early 70’s, 5 years after we started using a metal-metal prosthesis (Mc Kee-Merle d’Aubigné) we had to deal with a high rate of acetabular loosenings
At 2 y. 10 %
At 10 y. 32 %
![Page 3: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
These loosenings were sometimes associated with
severe acetabular bone loss.
After some unsuccessful
attempts, filling the bone loss with
cement or a big socket it seemed
to us that
![Page 4: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
bony reconstruction with bone was absolutely necessary.
Because a great amount of bone was needed, the use of allografts was indispensable and in 1974 we
reactivated our bone bank which existedsince 1955 to fill it with femoral heads resected
during THR.
![Page 5: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
COCHIN BONE BANK
• 1955: PRESERVATION OF MASSIVE BONES
(femur, tibia, humerus) used for bone reconstruction in tumor surgery
• 1974: PRESERVATION OF FEMORAL HEADS• 1985: PRESERVATION OF MASSIVE BONES
sterilized by gamma radiation
---> Every year
350 femoral heads
80 massive bones
![Page 6: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
10.74 06.75
Sometimes, it was possible to repair a wide destroyed acetabulum witha big head without any metallic fixation
![Page 7: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
12.73 01.74
But the existence, not so rare, of a pelvic discontinuity forced us tofind a metallic device to secure the fracture
![Page 8: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
We have had since 1970 a hemispheric cross with 4 arms which was used, in the position of a St Andrew’s cross, with the branches bended on the acetabular rim, as an antiprotrusio cage.
![Page 9: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
1974 PRE-OP 1975 1 y PO
In 1974, to secure a pelvic discontinuity, I used this device, one branch bended in a hook inserted under the teardrop, the opposite screwed to the iliac bone, the others cut at an adequate length. This osteosynthesis, associated with autogenous graft to fill the bone defect, led to bone union within a year
![Page 10: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
1976 2 y PO 2000 26 y PO
1 year later, a prosthesis was implanted leaving the armature in place.At 26 y. PO, despite a fracture of the hook which occurred 3 y PO, a polyethylene wear of more than 7 mm without osteolysis, the cemented fixation of the socket is still strong and the function of the hip satisfactory.
![Page 11: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
In 1976, this hemispheric cross shaped stainless steel armature, with 4 branches, an inferior hook an a superior flange with 4 screw holes was manufactured by Howmedica.
It was more rigid and suitable, unique and symmetrical, of medium size.
FIRST ARMATURE 1976
![Page 12: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
It allowed a strong, fixation of a pelvic discontinuity and kept in place the grafts coming from a femoral head shaped into cubes and slices to exactly repair the bone defect.
![Page 13: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
PRE-OP
8 m PO
This reconstruction seemed strong enough to implant a prosthesis atthe same time.
![Page 14: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
In 1984 this armature became asymmetrical with an anterior branch shorter than the posterior to avoid any contact with the psoas tendon and give the opening plane an anteversion of 15°
1984
![Page 15: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
It also became multiple and there are now a right and a left series of 6 sizes
![Page 16: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
For sockets from 40 to 60 mm in outside diameter
![Page 17: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
It acts as a guide and a reinforcement for bone reconstruction
First intended to secure a pelvic discontinuity, this device has been
systematically used for 35 years every time a bone reconstruction was necessary
![Page 18: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
ACETABULAR METALLIC ARMATUREHEMISPHERIC CROSS
• STIFF enough to ensure a strong fixation of a pelvic discontinuity
• OPEN, flexible enough not to change the elasticity of the acetabulum
• Automatically provides the artificial hip with the right anatomic centre
• Partially unloads the grafts during their incorporation
![Page 19: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
PRINCIPLES OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
To restore normal anatomic conditions
-Acetabular cavity of normal size in an anatomic position- The choice of the armature to be implanted is guided by two references :
. A healthy controlateral hip, or a radiograph of the homolateral hip before it was destroyed.
. If these references are missing, the size of the bony cavity in its inferior part must be taken into account, knowing that after bone reconstruction, the anterior, posterior and medial walls must be at least 7 mm thick.
![Page 20: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
After cleaning the destroyed acetabulum, the selected device is put in place, the hookunder the inferior marginnear the ischium.Then the device is tiltedat 45°. This movementshould not tend to ejectthe hook from the teardrop. If it does, three possible causes must be explored: 1) The acetabular device is too large, try a smaller one. 2) The medial wall just above the teardrop is too thick, thin it down
with a rongeur or a gouge until the hook stays in the right position.
3) The inferior acetabular margin is destroyed by a polyethylene granuloma. It should be repaired with an allograft fragment before inserting the hook.
![Page 21: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
When there is major structural defect of the roof, the superior flange does not come into contact with bone. One must not place the device more vertical neither open it nor bend the flange to adapt it to the bone loss. On the contrary, the acetabular armature should be used as a guide to evaluate the size and location of bone defect as well as the shape and dimension of the allograft fragments needed to achieve bone reconstruction.
![Page 22: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
If there is a defect of the inferior margin, more or less extended to the medial wall, it is first repaired with a bone fragment of the adequate size and shape, wedged in between the edges of the defect to give the hook a solid grasp.
![Page 23: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Then, the roof bone loss is filled with a bulky graft, if possible unique. This fragment is carefully shaped with the trabeculae properly oriented so that it can resist the pressure stresses in the bearing area. The superior part made convex accurately fits the dome, its inferior part made concave matches the convexity of the device. The flange of the device lies on its lateral part made of subchondral bone.
![Page 24: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Two screws then fix the flange to the iliac bone, the first, the inferior screw, pass the graft through a reamed hole, directed up and back, to put the armature under tension and bites the sound bone near the sacro iliac joint. A second, usually anterior, is needed to stabilize the armature.
Anterior and posterior walls are repaired by embedding slice grafts between the remaining wall bone and branches of the armature. Cavitary defects of pubic bone and ischium, as well as the gaps between structural grafts are filled with impacted cancellous bone.
![Page 25: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
When there is a pelvic discontinuity with a wide gap, it is advisable to close it. This can be done easily using the armature, the hook inserted under the teardrop, a Steinman pin obliquely introduced through a screw hole. A lever movement of the Steinman pin brings the separate bones in contact. The reduction of the fracture is then secured with 2 or 3 screws and bone reconstruction done by wedging slice fragments between bone and branches of the armature.
![Page 26: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
When the reconstruction is achieved, a socket of adequate size is cemented into this restored and armed bony cavity.
![Page 27: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
- On a AP x-rays of the hip, the armature appears in a strict lateral view
- Obturator hook in close contact with the teardrop
- Screws directed up and back, bite the sound bone near the sacro iliac joint
![Page 28: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
You can find details of this technique in Surgical Techniques in Orthopaedics and Traumatology.This technique, we have been using for 35 years, have allowed us to cope with all the cases encountered on over 2000 in the Orthopaedic Department of Hospital Cochin Paris, and for myself on 700 cases.
![Page 29: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
SOME EXAMPLES
![Page 30: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
PRE-OP 1 m PO
In this case a major bone loss of the roof and a pelvic discontinuity.
Bony restoration has beendone with a unique bulkyfragment.
![Page 31: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
PRE-OP
Here, a Beechtol prosthesis in a big protrusion.
X-rays at 9 y. PO
![Page 32: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
PRE-OP
The same patient, the controlateralside, severe bone defect
But a simpler restoration.The result a 8 y. PO
![Page 33: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
PRE-OP
Third consecutive failure,with severe acetabular bone loss
X-rays, 3 y. PO
![Page 34: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
PRE OP
Here a cementless prosthesisin a high position
PO 4 m
Restoration of a wide superiordefect and implantation of the socket in an anatomic position.
![Page 35: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
PRE-OP
A big bone loss with a completedestruction of the roof, the innerwall and inferior acetabularmargin
Restoration of the inner wallwith a wide and thick sliceof femoral head.X-rays at 1 y. PO
![Page 36: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
GRAFT
CONSOLIDATION
![Page 37: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
1 m PO 6 m PO
Union of the grafts, together and with the host bone, has been obtained within 1 year, as it is shown in this case where demarcation between graft and host bone has disappeared 6 months after the operation.
![Page 38: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
PRE-OP
1 m PO
In this other case, where 3 fragments were used.
![Page 39: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
1 y PO
4 y PO
Consolidation is obvious at 1 y. PO
And perfect at 4 y. PO
![Page 40: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
PRE-OP 1 m PO
Here, two big superposed fragments were used to fill a wide superior defect.
![Page 41: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
18 m PO
3 y PO
X-rays at 18 months PO And 3 y. PO
![Page 42: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
GRAFT REMODELLING
![Page 43: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
1 m PO 2 y PO
Bone remodelling, which began at 2 years, proceded for 5 to 6 years in the bearing zone
![Page 44: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
4 y PO 7 y PO
As shown by this X-rays 4 y. PO And 7 y. PO
![Page 45: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
PRE-OP
1 m PO
2 y PO
As well as in the inner wall where at 2 y. PO remodelling is obvious
These radiological pictures strongly suggest that grafts are biologically and mechanically incorporated.
![Page 46: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
RADIOLOGICAL PICTURES
LONG TERM
At long term, there has been, up to now, no serious problem
![Page 47: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
PRE-OP
8 y PO
A case at 8 years with a beautiful bone remodelling
![Page 48: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
PRE-OP
1 y PO
Another, with the steps of bone remodelling.
![Page 49: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
At 6 y. PO And 10 y. PO
![Page 50: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
PRE-OP 19 y PO
A pelvic discontinuity Its result a 19 y. PO
![Page 51: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
PRE-OP
20 y PO
Another At 20 y. PO
![Page 52: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
PRE-OP1 m PO
On the left hipProgressive remodelling of the graft at 1 m. PO
![Page 53: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
10 y PO 18 y PO
![Page 54: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
PRE-OP
1 m PO
2 y PO
Right hip, same patientAcetabular protrusion
Partial resorption of a too thick graft fragment
![Page 55: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
10 y PO 18 y PO
And bone remodelling at 10 y PO
And 18 y. PO
![Page 56: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
RESULTS
![Page 57: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Long term outcome of the technique was published 10 years ago in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
![Page 58: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
MATERIAL
• 53 PATIENTS: 48 women, 5 men
• MEAN AGE: 58 years
• OPERATED ON FROM 1976 to 1986
• 60 ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTIONS
• CONTINUOUS SERIES
• ONE SURGEON
• CHARNLEY-KERBOULL PROSTHESIS
![Page 59: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
MATERIAL
It was, most of the time, a failure of THR more often metal-polyethylene than metal-metal and for nearly 50 % a recurrent failure:
1 to 3 (near 1.7)
60 MECHANICAL ACETABULAR LOOSENINGS 4 Double cups
56 THR- Metal-Metal: 8- Metal-Polyethylene: 48
![Page 60: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
ACETABULAR DEFICIENCY
CLASSIFICATION
AAOS TYPE III 48 TYPE IV 12
SOFCOT TYPE III 48 TYPE IV 12
PAPROSKY TYPE III A 23 TYPE III B 37
![Page 61: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
FOLLOW-UP
They all had physical and radiologic examination at6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and every 2 years
Average follow up of the
Entire series 60 12.4 y. (5 to 24)
Deceased 8 (10 hips) (4 to 18 y. PO)
Lost 0
![Page 62: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
COMPLICATIONS
• 1 trochanteric non union• 1 deep veinous thrombosis (DVT)• 1 extensive haematoma (debrided)• 1 peroneal palsy• 0 infection• 0 dislocation
![Page 63: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
CLINICAL RESULTS(D’Aubigné score. max 18)
GLOBAL FUNCTION
BEFORE AFTER
11.7 17.7
EXCELLENT (18) 44
V. GOOD (17) 8
GOOD (16) 1
FAIR (15) 5
POOR (14) 2
BAD (13) 0
5380 %
![Page 64: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS
SUCCESSES 57No graft resorptionNo acetabular loosening
FAILURES 3 (5 %)Graft lysis due to polyethylene wear (This is
different from early resorption which is extremely rare and occurs when the patient has developed antibodies against HLA of the graft)
Graft resorption led to break of armature or screws and socket loosening
2 were revised with the same technique and were successful 7
and 10 y. PO
![Page 65: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
10.86 1 y PO 10.88 3 y PO
This is one of them The first change was a breakof the armature at 3 y.
![Page 66: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
10.93 8 y PO 10.94 1 y PR
5 y. later graft resorption was complete, the device broken in 3 parts and the acetabular component loose
This case was revised with the same technique. Here the X-rays at 1 y. PO
![Page 67: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
X-rays at 7 y. PO
One could not be revised because of poor cardio vascular conditions
![Page 68: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
SURVIVAL CURVE(Acetabular component loosening as end point)
![Page 69: ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFTS, METALLIC ARMATURE AND CEMENTED PROSTHESIS](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815df9550346895dcc327a/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
CONCLUSION
With a 92 % survival rate of the cemented fixation of the acetabular component at 16 y. and despite these few failures this technique can be regarded as reliable, even at long term.