Accounting for heterogeneity: Possibilities of using TEC to extend supply & use tables Fabienne...
-
Upload
geoffrey-hattan -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Accounting for heterogeneity: Possibilities of using TEC to extend supply & use tables Fabienne...
Accounting for heterogeneity:Possibilities of using TEC to extend
supply & use tables
Fabienne FortanierHead of Trade StatisticsOECD
Accounting for heterogeneity
• Key assumption in TiVA: homogeneous industries– all firms allocated to a particular industry have the same ‘
production’ function– That for a given product, imports by industries (firms) are
sourced from the same mix of countries
• Key challenge: taking the GVC beyond the industry level: accounting for firm heterogeneity– Not all firms in each industry are equally (or similarly) involved
in GVCs – Extent of GVC involvement is correlated with virtually all
dimensions of GVC impact, including value added, productivity, technology, size, growth, survival rate
3
Accounting for heterogeneity
• To what extent can we capitalize on existing statistics, including TEC, STEC, FATS, “TEC+”, to • a) improve our estimates (of e.g. the import content of
exports) and
• b) develop new, ‘richer’ indicators on GVCs (how, where, who)
• These statistics are policy relevant in their own right and for integration within TiVA framework
4
This presentation
• Highlights the importance of heterogeneity (using TEC)
• Explains more about TEC & how the data are compiled
• Lists the ‘ideal’ additional data needs for breaking down SUTs by enterprise characteristics– Requires combination of TEC and additional business
statistics (including SBS and FATS)
• Illustrates its possible uses in breaking down supply and use tables and challenges to overcome
• Gives an overview of current steps taken by the OECD to further this research agenda
Trade is concentrated among a few enterprises
LU
X
HU
N
FIN
NZ
L*
SV
K
ES
T
SW
E
DN
K
CA
N*
GR
C
SV
N
GB
R
AU
T
PR
T
FR
A
DE
U
NL
D
CZ
E
ES
P
PO
L
TU
R*
US
A*
ITA0%
10
0%
Top 5 Top 10 Top 20 Top 50 Top 100
(% of total* export accounted for by top # enterprises)
* For EU countries, data refer to extra-EU exports instead of total
6
Exporting firms are responsible for the majority of imports (1)
Irelan
d
Bulga
ria
Roman
ia
Finla
nd
Portug
al
Hun
gary
Latv
ia
Greec
e
Luxe
mbo
urg
Denm
ark
Austria
Slov
akia
Eston
iaIta
ly
Slov
enia
Franc
e
Pola
nd
Swed
en
Net
herla
nds
Belgi
um
Lith
uani
a
Uni
ted
Kingd
om
Germ
any
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Exporting firms' weight in total imports
7
Exporting firms are responsible for the majority of imports (2)
Irela
nd
Bulga
ria
Roman
ia
Finla
nd
Portu
gal
Hunga
ry
Latvia
Greec
e
Luxem
bour
g
Denm
ark
Austria
Slova
kia
Eston
iaIta
ly
Slove
nia
Franc
e
Polan
d
Sweden
Nethe
rland
s
Belgi
um
Lithua
nia
Unite
d Kin
gdom
Germ
any
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Value of imports per firm (exporters)Value of imports per firm (non exporters)
The value of imports per firm are on average 20 times greater for exporters than for non-exporters
Size matters (2)
Trade is concentrated among large firms(export value by firm size class in employees)
SW
E
DN
K
AU
T
ES
T
GB
R
TU
R*
FR
A
NL
D
ES
P
SV
N
SV
K
US
A*
GR
C
FIN
HU
N
PR
T
LU
X
CA
N*
DE
U
ITA
PO
L
CZ
E0%
10
0%
0-9 emp. 10-49 emp. 50-249 emp. 250+ emp. Confidential or unknown
Ownership matters (1)
Very few firms are foreign owned, but…(foreign owned firms and foreign affiliates, as % of all enterprises)
AU
T
CZ
E
FIN
FR
A
DE
U
HU
N
IRE
ITA
NL
D
NO
R
PR
T
SV
K
SV
N
ES
P
SW
E
GB
R
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
foreign owned enterprises foreign affiliates abroad
Ownership matters (2)
foreign owned enterprises account for ~ 1/3 of turnover, 1/5 of employment and 1/4 of value added in OECD countries…(% of turnover, employment and value added by foreign owned
enterprises)
AU
T
CZ
E
FIN
FR
A
DE
U
HU
N
IRE
ITA
NL
D
NO
R
PR
T
SV
K
SV
N
ES
P
SW
E
GB
R
0%
20%
40%
60%
Turnover Number of employees Value added at factor cost
11
Ownership matters (3)
…and for at least 1/3 of international trade
Austria
Czech
Rep
ublic
Eston
ia
Finla
nd
Franc
e
Germ
any
Hun
gary
Italy
Luxe
mbo
urg
Pola
nd
Portug
al
Slov
ak R
epub
lic
Swed
en
Uni
ted
Kingd
om
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Foreign controlled as % of firms % exports% imports
12
Trade by Enterprise Characteristics (TEC)
• All these presented examples are based on TEC data (OECD/Eurostat):– Trade by Size Classes & Economic Activity– Trade by Economic Activity & Top Enterprises– Trade by Economic Activity & Partner Zones – Trade by Economic Activity & Number of Partner
Countries– Trade by Economic Activity & Commodity Group– Trade by Type of Ownership & Economic Activity
• Domestically controlled enterprises (with or without own affiliates)
• Foreign controlled enterprises
TEC coverage and compilation
About the OECD-Eurostat TEC database:• Covers 33 countries (6 non-OECD) from 2005
onwards, up to 2 digit level of ISIC rev 3 & 4• Based on trade statistics linked to the
business register • Matching rates excellent to perfect• But some issues remain
– e.g. non-resident trade – overemphasis of wholesalers – Confidential data
Use Table
14
ExporterNon-
ExporterExporter
Non-Exporter
ExporterNon-
ExporterExporter
Non-Exporter
ExporterNon-ExporterExporter Non-ExporterExporterNon-ExporterExporterNon-ExporterTaxes on ProductsSubididies on Products
Total Domestic intermediate Consumption
Total importsTotal intermediate ConsumptionValue-Addedof which
Mixed Income
Compensation of Employees
Gross Operating Surplus
Other Taxes on Production
Other Subsidies on Production
Total Outputof which
own-account production of software
own-account prodduction of R&D
other own-account production
of which - non-
residents expenditure
Industry 1 Industry 2Foreign Domestic Foreign Domestic HHFC GGFC GFCF
Changes in
Inventories
Vauables Exports of which re-exports
Industry 1
Industry 2
Foreign
Domestic
Foreign
Domestic
15
Accounting for heterogeneity in SUTs
A strongly simplified example (1 industry)
Homogeneous(now)
Heterogeneous(future)
All Industry ‘Domestic’ ‘Trader’
Imports 25 0 25
Domestic purchases 30 15 15
Value added 45 15 30
Total output 100 30 70
Export 60 0 60
Domestic sales 40 30 10
Import content of export:
25%(25 / 100)
36% (25 / 70)
16
Information needs
For a breakdown between exporting / non exporting firms:• Geographical breakdown (e.g. main trading partners,
regions) of imports and exports (by exporting / non-exporting firms)
• Purchases, output, value added (employment if possible), by industry, broken down by exporting vs non-exporting firm
• link TEC with SBSFor a breakdown with (also) foreign ownership:• (Same as above) + exports by ownership, industry and
foreign ownership• link TEC with FATS
17
Feasibility of ‘macro-linking’
• Use the information from the three different data sources at the ISIC 2-digit industry level
• Illustrates (again) the importance and relevance of accounting for heterogeneity
• BUT: highlights also some problems that can only be solved at micro level
Examples of ‘Macro-linking’ (1)
18
Foreign-controlled enterprises are more export intensive
Export to turnover ratios, total economy (2011)
Austr
ia
Germ
any
Eston
ia
Finla
nd
Franc
e
Uni
ted
Kingd
om Ital
y
Luxem
bour
g
Polan
d
Portu
gal
Slova
k Rep
ublic
Swed
en0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Domestic Foreign
19
Value added over turnover ratio tends to be higher for domestic firms
Value added/Turnover by firm ownership, total economy (2011)
AUT
CZEDEU
ESPEST
FINFRA
GBRH
UN
IRL
ITA
LUX
NLD
NOR
POL
PRTSVK
SVNSW
E0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
foreign controlled domestic
Examples of ‘macro-linking’ (2)
Challenges (1): wholesale is treated very differently across data sources
20
mot
or veh
icle
s
other
tra
nspor
t
elec
tric
ity
wat
er, s
ew.
const
ruct
ion
sale
mot
or
whol
esal
e
reta
il
tran
sp &
sto
rage
info
rmat
ion &
com
m.
0%10%20%30%40%50%
% S/U table proportional allocationintermediate in TEC
Correlation S/U and proportional allocation: 0.8Correlation S/U and TEC intermediate imports: 0.55
Imported intermediates / total intermediates: comparing SU table, proportional allocation and TEC data (Italy 2010 )
21
Challenges (2): Populations are inconsistent across data sources
AU
T
BE
L
BG
R
DE
U
ES
T
FIN
FR
A
GB
R
HU
N
IRL
ITA
LT
U
LU
X
LV
A
PO
L
PR
T
RO
U
SV
K
SV
N
SW
E
US
A
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0_9 employees 10_49 50_249 250
Number of 2 digit industries where the number of exporters in TEC is larger than the number of enterprises
in SBS, by size, 2011
22
Challenges (3): Variable values are inconsistent across data sources
AUT
BELBGR
DEUEST
FRAGBR
HUN
IRL
LTU
LVA
POL
ROU
SVK
SVN
012345678
0_9 employees 10_4950_249 250
Number of industries for which exports (from TEC) are larger than turnover (SBS) (by firm size, 2011)
23
Challenge (4): Inconsistencies between TEC and FATS
Differences in the share of imports of foreign-controlled firms as measured in TEC and in FATS (Italy 2011)
Pharmaceutical products
05_09
10_12
13_15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 41_43
45_47
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
FATS TEC
Current activities at the OECD
• Increase country coverage in TEC data• Investigate methodological improvements
– Better explanation of matching rates (non-resident trade);– Better assignment of trade accounted for by retailers and
wholesalers to underlying economic activities;– Explore if confidentiality issues can be overcome by deciding on
(harmonized) aggregation of certain items;
• Include services (STEC)• Add to visibility: e.g. website on TEC : http://oe.cd/tec
with country notes (forthcoming)• Continue with feasibility studies re. heterogeneity in
SUTs (including work with individual countries who can provide data)
• Institutional: WPTGS; Expert Group on Extended SUTs
Thank you
Contact:
Fabienne Fortanier [email protected] of Trade Statistics
TEC : http://oe.cd/tec
TiVA : http://oe.cd/tiva
25