Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites...

16
Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites (2007) Assessment of Microstructural Integrity of Glass/Epoxy Composites at Liquid Nitrogen Temperature Surendra Kumar M, Nirmal Chawla, Asima Priyadarsini, Itishree Mishra and B. C. Ray* Department of Metallurgical & Materials Engineering National Institute of Technology, Rourkela-769008, India *Author for correspondence: Email: [email protected] (B C Ray) ABSTRACT Polymer composite materials have received increased attention for applications in cryogenic environment because of their light weight and unique properties. The research presented in this paper is an effort to understand the interlaminar fracture behavior of glass/epoxy composite laminates at cryogenic conditions and at different loading rates. This study uses 3-point flexural test to qualitatively assess such behavior for 50 weight percentage of E-glass fibers reinforced epoxy composites during cryogenic and ambient conditions. The specimens were tested at a range of 2 mm/min to 500 mm/min crosshead speed to evaluate the sensitivity of mechanical response during loading at these conditions. The mechanical performances of the laminated specimens at cryogenic conditions were compared with room temperature property by using SEM photographs. Phenomenological behavior of these materials may be attributed by polymer relaxation, low- temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due to differential thermal coefficient of the constituent phases and also by enhanced mechanical keying factor by compressive residual stresses at cryogenic temperatures.

Transcript of Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites...

Page 1: Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites …dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/410/1/surendra...temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due

Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and

Composites (2007)

Assessment of Microstructural Integrity of Glass/Epoxy Composites at Liquid Nitrogen Temperature

Surendra Kumar M, Nirmal Chawla, Asima Priyadarsini, Itishree Mishra and

B. C. Ray* Department of Metallurgical & Materials Engineering

National Institute of Technology, Rourkela-769008, India

*Author for correspondence: Email: [email protected] (B C Ray)

ABSTRACT

Polymer composite materials have received increased attention for applications in cryogenic

environment because of their light weight and unique properties. The research presented in this

paper is an effort to understand the interlaminar fracture behavior of glass/epoxy composite

laminates at cryogenic conditions and at different loading rates. This study uses 3-point flexural test

to qualitatively assess such behavior for 50 weight percentage of E-glass fibers reinforced epoxy

composites during cryogenic and ambient conditions. The specimens were tested at a range of 2

mm/min to 500 mm/min crosshead speed to evaluate the sensitivity of mechanical response during

loading at these conditions. The mechanical performances of the laminated specimens at cryogenic

conditions were compared with room temperature property by using SEM photographs.

Phenomenological behavior of these materials may be attributed by polymer relaxation, low-

temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due to differential thermal coefficient of

the constituent phases and also by enhanced mechanical keying factor by compressive residual

stresses at cryogenic temperatures.

anjali
Text Box
Archived in Dspace@nitr http://dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace
Page 2: Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites …dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/410/1/surendra...temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due

2

Keywords: glass/epoxy composites, cryogenic environment, interlaminar shear strength, polymer

relaxation, matrix cracking, differential thermal coefficient

INTRODUCTION

Polymer composite materials have received increased attention for applications in

cryogenic environment because of their light weight and unique properties [1]. In space

vehicles, size may not matter, but weight does. Lifting a payload straight up to escape

Earth's gravity requires a phenomenal expenditure of energy, and every ounce saved in

either launch vehicle or payload weight translates to lower project costs. Next generation

space missions emphasize cutting the cost of launching payloads into orbit by designing

and development of Reusable Launch Vehicles (RLV) [2]. Lightweight and strong

composite materials are already used in many applications, such as launch vehicle bodies

and payload components. But tankage for cryogenic propellant is the major contributor to

the mass of the launcher. Recently one area identified as potential source for significant

weight reduction is the replacement of traditional metallic cryogenic fuel tanks with

advanced polymeric matrix composite (PMC) tanks. Carbon-fiber/epoxy-resin composites

have been evaluated for cryogenic tankage in RLV (reusable launch vehicle) [3]. Woven-

fabric glass/epoxy laminates are used as thermal insulation, electrical insulation, structural

support and permeability barrier in superconducting magnets which are essential

components of most current and planned fusion devices [4]. Interface is the heart of the

composite. The local response of fiber matrix interface within the composite plays an

important role in determining the gross mechanical performance [5]. It provides a means of

stress transfer from fiber to fiber through the matrix. The concept of two-dimensional

Page 3: Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites …dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/410/1/surendra...temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due

3

interface between fiber and matrix has given way to the evolution of the 3-D region mere

properly termed as “interphase”. This region includes the 2-D region of contact between

fiber and matrix but also incorporates a region of some finite thickness extending on the

both sides of the interface. This interphase will posses unique properties different from the

bulk matrix [6]. It can include impurities, unreacted polymer components, non-polymerized

additives etc. The thickness and properties of this interphase have crucial impact on the

composite properties [7]. The interphase not only allows load transfer between fibers

through matrix but also provides a matching of chemical and thermal compatibility

between the constituents. A thin rigid interphase leads to a low fracture resistance while a

thick soft interface results in a better fracture resistance but a lower composite stiffness [8].

The thickness of the interphase depends on the polymer/filler system. It is generally

recognized that the bond strength variation at the interface greatly affects the integrity of

composite materials. The bond strength depends on quality of interfacial adhesion [9].

Residual thermal stresses develop in these materials when they are exposed to cryogenic

temperatures. These stresses are the result of a difference in the CTEs (coefficients of

thermal expansion) between the reinforcement and the matrix. The non-zero state of

residual thermal stresses at cryogenic temperatures is the underlying cause of

microcracking in composites and the microcracks could have an important influence on

their performance. A very large thermal expansion mismatch can result in debonding at the

fiber/matrix interface and/or a possible matrix cracking due to thermal stress [10]. Epoxy

resin and E-glass fiber are reported to be loading rate sensitive. The ductility of a matrix

resin may become a limiting factor at high strain rate for composite strength. Epoxy resin is

more ductile than it’s composite at low strain rate [11]. The main objective of this paper to

Page 4: Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites …dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/410/1/surendra...temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due

4

access the mechanical behavior of cryogenically conditioned glass epoxy composite at

different loading rates.

EXPERIMENTAL

Araldite LY-556, an unmodified epoxy resin based on Bisphenol-A and hardener (Ciba-

Geig, India) HY-951, aliphatic primary amine were used with woven roving E-glass fibers

treated with silane based sizing system (Saint-Gobain Vetrotex) to fabricate the laminated

composites. The fiber weight percentage 50% was targeted in the laminate fabrication.

They were cured for 48 hours at room temperature. The laminates were cut into short beam

shear (SBS) test specimens by diamond cutter. The SBS 3-point bend tests were conducted

to determine the interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) of composites. The cured specimens

were exposed to liquid nitrogen environment (77K) for one hour. After the exposure one

batch of samples were taken out and kept at room temperature for one hour. Another batch

of samples was tested in 3-point bend test immediately after exposure to cryogenic

temperature. The former samples after exposure to room temperature and the untreated as-

cured composite specimens were tested in 3-point bend test at room temperature. All the

mechanical flexural tests were performed at 2, 50, 100, 200 and 500 mm/min crosshead

speeds. The interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) was measured as follows,

ILSS = 0.75p/bt

Page 5: Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites …dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/410/1/surendra...temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due

5

Where,

‘p’ is the breaking load, ‘b’ the width, and ‘t’ the thickness of the specimen.

An Instron1195 tensile testing machine was used to perform SBS tests in accordance with

ASTM D 2344-84 standard. Multiple samples were tested at each point of experiment and

the average value was reported.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The effects of different crosshead speeds on ILSS value at cryogenic temperature (♦),

ambient temperature after exposure to cryogenic temperature (■) and at ambient

temperature of untreated samples (▲) of glass-epoxy laminates are shown in figure 1.

Figure 1 shows the variation of ILSS value of glass-epoxy composite with different loading

rates at ambient temperature condition (▲). It is evident from the graph that the nature of

the curve is different at above and below 50mm/min crosshead speed. The ILSS value is

low for lower speed and increase with the loading rate upto 50mm/min. This lower value at

lower crosshead speed may be due to higher failure strain at low strain rates so with

increase in speed the ILSS increases. Here more time is available at lower crosshead

loading speeds for the failure to take place, which results in more deterioration causing the

reduction in the value of ILSS. With higher crosshead speeds (above 50mm/min) the curve

is just the opposite. Here very less time is available for the failure to take place, it is more

like an impact, so may be the matrix is unable to transfer the load properly which leads to

matrix cracking (figure 2). The higher crosshead speed during test restricts and minimizes

the relaxation processes at the crack tip. These stress-induced cracks may grow without

blunting leading to reduced ILSS at higher loading rates [12]. Figure 1 shows the variation

Page 6: Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites …dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/410/1/surendra...temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due

6

of ILSS value of glass-epoxy composite with different loading rates at cryogenic condition

(♦). The ILSS values are higher than the untreated samples for almost all loading rates.

Here also a slight increase in the shear strength was marked with increasing in loading rate

upto 50mm/min after that the shear strength decreases. The higher value of ILSS may be

due to cryogenic hardening of matrix phase which leads to the improvement in shear

strength at lower loading rates. Residual stresses build due to differential contraction during

sudden cooling from room temperature to cryogenic temperature (77K). The cryogenic

conditioning causes differential contraction and increases the resistance to debonding by

mechanical keying factor [13]. When cooling from the cure temperature, differences in

thermal contraction between the matrix and fiber will generate shear stresses in the resin.

When a stress is applied, shear stresses greater than the shear strength of the resin is readily

generated and failure of the resin phase will result. When the composite is stressed further

by cooling and loading in the cold state, it is likely that there will be resin/fiber debonding.

As shown in the figure 3, due differential contraction of epoxy at cryogenic temperature the

epoxy will try to come out from the bulk composite. The characteristic of the interfacial

adhesion is strongly influenced by the presence of residual stresses. Some of the stresses

developed are relaxed by viscoelastic flow in polymer matrix [14]. It was also observed

that above 50mm/min loading speed the ILSS value drops due to matrix cracking. Here the

ductility of a resin matrix could become a limiting factor at high loading rate for the

composite strength. The specimens tested at a cryogenic temperature are characterized by a

greater order of micro-cracking and delamination (figure 4). A plastic deformation zone

ahead of crack tip region may possible be formed by matrix deformation and micro

cracking [15]. A weaker of interfacial bond may result in a low flexural strength of the

Page 7: Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites …dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/410/1/surendra...temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due

7

laminate. The deteriorated integrity can cause low strength at high loading. Figure 1 shows

the variation of ILSS value of glass-epoxy composite with different loading rates at room

temperature after exposing to cryogenic temperature (■). The matrix hardening which was

in the cryogenic condition for which we got higher values of ILSS at lower speed may be

relaxed at room temperature lowering its shear strength but higher than non-treated

samples. At lower crosshead speeds the stress redistribution occurs which limit the

initiation of new cracks. The high and complex nature of residual stresses at cryogenic

temperature and also at room temperature after exposure to cryogenic temperature may

possibly result in larger debonded interfaces (figure 5). Higher crosshead speed during

testing restricts and/or minimizes the relaxation processes at the crack tip [12]. Thermal

stress-induced cracks may possibly grow without blunting at a steady rate. That could

reduce the interlaminar strength at higher loading rate.

CONCLUSIONS

It can be concluded that the ILSS values for cryogenic conditioned samples are higher than

the rest two cases for almost all the crosshead speeds. This may be attributed to mechanical

keying factor at the interface due to contraction of epoxy at cryogenic temperature. Also it

was found that the glass-epoxy composites are loading rate sensitive. At lower crosshead

speeds the shear strength value increases and decreases at higher speeds for all the three

cases. It may possibly be attributed to the less prevalent relaxation process at the crack tip.

The crack blunting may happen to be less common occurrence at higher rate of loading.

Relaxation phenomena may be attributed to the samples exposed to room temperature after

cryogenically conditioning for the mechanical behavior at different loading rates.

Page 8: Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites …dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/410/1/surendra...temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due

8

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Authors are expressing their deep gratitude to National Institute of Technology, Rourkela

for the given infrastructural facilities to complete the project. The experimental work was

assisted by Mr. Samir Pradhan and his cooperation is highly appreciated.

Page 9: Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites …dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/410/1/surendra...temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due

9

REFERENCES

1. Jackel, M. (1995). Thermal Properties of Polymer/Particle Composites at Low Temperatures,

Cryogenics, 35(11): 713-716.

2. Bansemir, H. and Haider, O. (1998). Fiber Composite Structures for Space Applications –

Recent and Future Developments, Cryogenics, 38(1): 51-59.

3. Heydenreich, R. (1998). Cryo-Tanks for Future Vehicles, Cryogenics, 38; 125-130.

4. Fabian, P. E.; Rice J. A.; Munshi, N. A.; Humer, K. and Weber, H. W. (2002) Novel Radiation-

Resistant Insulation Systems for Fusion Magnets, Engineering Design, 61; 795-799.

5. Li-Min Zhou (1993). Micromechanical Characterization of Fiber/Matrix Interfaces; Composites

Science and Technology; 48; 227-236.

6. Hatsuo Ishida (1990). Controlled Interphases in Composite Materials, Elsevier Science

Publication, 431-440.

7. Hatsuo Ishida (1990). Controlled Interphases in Composite Materials, Elsevier science

publication, 87-96.

8. Jones, C. (1991). The Chemistry of Carbon Fiber Surfaces and its Effect on Interfacial

Phenomena in Fiber/Epoxy Composites, Composites Science and Technology, 42(1-3): 275-298.

9. Ray, B. C. (2006). Adhesion of Glass/Epoxy Composites Influenced by Thermal and Cryogenic

Environments, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 102(2): 1943-1949.

10. Ray, B. C. (2004). Thermal Shock on Interfacial Adhesion of Thermally Conditioned Glass

Fiber/Epoxy Composites, Materials Letters, 58(16): 2175-2177.

Page 10: Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites …dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/410/1/surendra...temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due

10

11. Padmanabhan, K. (1996). Time-Temperature Failure Analysis of Epoxies and Unidirectional

Glass/Epoxy Composites in Compression,Composites: Part A, 27A; 585-596.

12. Ray, B. C. (2006). Loading Rate Sensitivity of Glass Fiber-Epoxy Composite at Ambient and

Sub-Ambient Temperatures, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 25(3): 329-333.

13. Ray, B. C. (2005). Effects of Thermal and Cryogenic Conditionings on Mechanical Behavior of

Thermally Shocked Glass Fiber/Epoxy Composites, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and

Composites, 24(7): 713-715.

14. Hull, D. and Clyne, T. W. (1996). The Interface Region, An Introduction to Composite

Materials; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.138-149.

15. Ray, B. C. (2005). Freeze-Thaw Response of Glass-Polyester Composites at Different Loading

Rates, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 24(16): 1771-1776.

Page 11: Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites …dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/410/1/surendra...temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due

11

FIGURE CAPTIONS Figure 1 Variation of ILSS of glass-epoxy composites with crosshead speed at cryogenic

temperature (♦), ambient temperature after cryogenic conditioning (■) and

ambient temperature (▲).

Figure 2 Scanning micrograph shows matrix cracking at high loading rate (500mm/min)

of as cured specimen at ambient temperature.

Figure 3 Scanning micrograph shows fiber/matrix debonding due to differential

contraction of cryogenically conditioned specimen.

Figure 4 Scanning micrograph shows massive microcracking and delamination of

cryogenically conditioned specimen.

Figure 5 Scanning micrograph shows debonded interfaces of specimens at room

temperature after cryogenic conditioning.

Page 12: Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites …dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/410/1/surendra...temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due

12

2021222324252627282930

2 102 202 302 402 502

Crosshead Speed (mm/min)

ILSS

(MPa

)

Figure 1

Page 13: Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites …dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/410/1/surendra...temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due

13

Figure 2

Page 14: Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites …dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/410/1/surendra...temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due

14

Figure 3

Page 15: Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites …dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/410/1/surendra...temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due

15

Figure 4

Page 16: Accepted in Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites …dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/410/1/surendra...temperature hardening, matrix cracking, and misfit strain due

16

Figure 5