ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY ...ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT -...
Transcript of ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY ...ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT -...
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name? M0013 Seam Thickness? 7m4 Roadway height as mined - Mains? 3.2m
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels? 3.2m
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains? 4.8m7 Roadway width as mined - Panels? 4.8m8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains? 40m between adjacent headings, cut throughs vary.
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels? 45m x 100m
10 Number of development units - Mains? 1
11 Number of development units - Panels? 2Dual miner 2 entry gateroad development.
12 Normal crew manning - Mains? 81 deputy (supervisor), 5 operators, 1 mechanical and 1
electrical tradesperson.
13 Normal crew manning - Panels? 131 deputy (supervisor), 10 operators, 1 mechanical and 1
electrical tradesperson.
14 CM type - Mains? 12CM30
15 CM type - Panels? 2 X 12CM30Dual miner unit.
16 Roof bolting system - Mains? Hydramatic rigs 4 x roof 2 x rib
17 Roof bolting system - Panels? Hydramatic rigs 2 x roof 2 x rib (CM95) Hydramatic rigs 4 x roof 2 x rib (CM37)
18 Coal clearance system - Mains? 2 Noyes Hydracars
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name? M001
MINE RESPONSES
19 Coal clearance system - Panels? 2 Waratah "Waracars"
20 Material supply system - Mains? Eimco and trailers transport bolt pods and mesh into panels with roof bolting pods then lifted onto continuous miner with an Eimco with a jib. Roof mesh modules are
manually loaded individually onto racks on the miner. Rib mesh modules are stored outbye face and manually
handled around immediate face area.
21 Material supply system - Panels? Eimco and trailers transport bolt pods and mesh into panels with roof bolting pods then lifted onto continuous miner with an Eimco with a jib. Roof mesh modules are
manually loaded individually onto racks on the miner. Rib mesh modules are hung from monorail and manually
handled around immediate face area. 22 Working arrangements:
Days/week? 7 day development, 5 day longwall.
Shift duration? 8 hours Monday - Friday.12 Hours Friday - Sunday.
Roster system? Fixed roster Weekday roster 5 x 8 hour shifts
Weekend roster 3 x 12 hour shifts
23 Mine challenges:Depth? 380mSeam grade? Slight
In situ and residual gas levels? Neglible in situ gas levels.
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime? High stress domain associated with close proximity of basal lineaments and strike/slip structures.
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
Long term, mature workforce.
Limited skills base among miners and trades to replace personnel leaving due to retirement.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name? M001
MINE RESPONSES
Mine life cycle? 35Mtonnes recoverable remaining in reserves - approximately 10 years life remaining.
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
Longwalls orientated at 90 degrees to that typically employed in region.
Adverse ground conditions associated with regional lineaments and strike/slip structures necessitates spiling of
roadway in advance of mining to secure roof - approximately 10% of development drivage considered
adverse.Soft floor associated with adverse ground conditions also necessitated concreting floor of entire maingate roadway.Mine culture exhibits features typical of mines that were
formerly publicly owned.
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
6 X 2100mm roofbolts with roof mesh module /0.9m advance, plus 2 X 1500mm steel rib bolts with rib mesh
module / 0.9m on each rib 4 X 4m JSS tendons/0.9m advance in intersections.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
6 X 2100mm roofbolts with roof mesh module /0.9m advance, plus 2 X 1500mm steel rib bolts with rib mesh
module / 0.9m on each rib 4 X 4m JSS tendons/0.9m advance in intersections.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
8m twin strand mini-cage cable bolts where required by Strata Action Plan
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name? M001
MINE RESPONSES
28 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
8m twin strand mini-cage cable bolts where required by Strata Action Plan
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
2 Roof strata to 4m consists of coal interbedded with weak
siltstones and claystones. Above 4m weak sandstone strata
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
1 Ribs fully meshed with 2 x 1.5m bolts / metre / rib.
Rectification work frequently required especially on corners. Currently trialling use of 3m rib cables
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
2 Often experience soft floor in geologically disturbed areas
requiring concreting to continue haulage
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
6.15km
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
1.34Mt
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
8.59km
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
3.13Mt
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
50m/wk/CM
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name? M001
MINE RESPONSES
39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
70m/wk/CM
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
10km
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
3.25Mt
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
58m/wk/CM
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
80m/wk/CM
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
2+ - 3-, low to good.Coal cutting is not the issue, coals falls off face.
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
2 - low.In adverse roof conditions need to install 4m and 6m
tendons close to face.
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
3 - good.15SC Warracars a bit big for seam conditions however like
the technology. Looking at 22SC as replacements to enable face to be cut
with two 9 -10 tonne payloads per metre advance.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name? M001
MINE RESPONSES
47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
2+ - 3-, low to good.Switching to rubber tyred system from rail mounted
system.Lot of inefficiency in system currently, labour intensive.
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
2 - low.Has been area of biggest improvement, now consistently achieving dual miner 2 heading panel moves in 24 hours.
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
2 - 3, low to good.Some improvement noted, implementing maintenance
plan.
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
3 - 4, good to very good.Has been a nightmare, but recently upgraded.
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
Standardisation of equipment.Focus on development process and attention to detail.
Five 8 hour shifts rather than four 9 hour shifts with consistent crews.
Improved panel moves.Improved maintenance management.
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name? M001
MINE RESPONSES
53 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
Still targeting 9 - 10kms of development per annum, although expect to achieve a 10 - 20% improvement ion
productivity due to incremental technology improvements.
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
Bolting and meshing face.Supplies and logistics.
Panel advances in dual panels.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
1 - Bolting and meshing face.2 - Supplies and logistics.
3 - Panel advances in dual panels.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name? M001
MINE RESPONSES
59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture, commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
Something like a Joy Sumps Shearer that allows close, intensive face support, cuts and bolts continuously, and
has good ergonomics.Integrated with continuous haulage system that has low
floor bearing pressure.Automated materials handling system.
Improved systems and hardware for installing longer than seam height tendons.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
No OEM support.Challenging mining conditions.
Lack of capital.Too early to determine if ABM25 the right technology.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name? M001
MINE RESPONSES
61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
Faster systems of bolting.Automation of materials handling.
Roof support technology and systems - using CM as a secondary support platform.
Cutting technology OK.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
New integrated mining system - continuous cutting and bolting machine.
Roof and rib support materials and associated handling systems.
Materials supply (and automation) to reduce labour involved and injuries sustained in manual handling
systems.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
Introduction of place change mining.Introduction of Joy Sumps Shearer.
Aware of ACBM.1995 ACARP roadway development workshop.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name? M001
MINE RESPONSES
67 How would you describe those initiatives in respect to their success or otherwise?
Joy Sumps Shearer - as good as 12CM30 when cutting, however suffered from lack of OEM support, lack of parts,
and lack of skilled people.ACBM - exciting, but not sufficiently generic enough for all
mines.Place change mining - highly dependant upon seam
conditions, requires good conditions across major part of mine to justify, lacks roof support flexibility other than
reduced cut outs.ACARP workshop - good initiative, but went no where (here comes ACARP again!!), didn't do the economic
evaluation..
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
Probably better at focussing on process now and involving people to gain ownership - has been refined over past 5
years.
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
3 - very interested in industry based incremental change initiatives.
Particularly in initiatives that are site relevant.Mine is reported to have suffered as a result of earlier trials
of Joy Sumps Shearer and VVVF conveyors.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name? M001
MINE RESPONSES
70 What specific research and development initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
Horizontal drilling technology for installation of Wiborex spiling bolts.
Smaller, lower ground pressure haulage systems.Roof support systems, hardware and consumables.
Monorail systems.Supply systems.
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
Yes
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
Company now trying to be more proactive since it has developed critical mass.
Do we need to develop global products or do we need to adapt and customise global products?
Investment in trial of TBM technology would require full commitment from mine and OEM.
A Does mine require a copy of the study report? Yes.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0022.8 - 3.2m2.8 - 3.2m
2.8 - 3.2m
5.2m5.2m
45m between adjacent headings, cut throughs vary.
45m X 150m.Intended to reduce to 45m X 125m in new panels.
1Currently completing Mains before relocation to panel
development.
Second development unit scheduled for panel development late 2005 following delivery of a refurbished
and overhauled continuous miner.
81 deputy (supervisor), 5 operators, 1 mechanical and 1
electrical tradesperson.
ABM20
Joy12CM12 due for delivery late 2005.
4 Joy HFX roof bolters and 2 Joy HFX rib bolters.
12CM12 to be fitted with 4 Joy HFX roof bolters and 2 Joy HFX rib bolters.
2 Joy 15SC delivering to breaker feeder.Temporary haulage system currently in place during
installation of Mains conveyor - shuttle cars discharge coal into storage and an FBL loader recovers coal and transports it up to 2km to trunk conveyor system.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M002MINE RESPONSES
Eimco and trailers transport bolt and mesh pods into panels with roof bolting pods then racked onto continuous
miner with racking jib. Rib bolts and rib mesh are transported in a separate pod, with materials manually
handled around immediate face area.
7 days per week.
9 hours for weekday roster employees.12 hour shifts for weekend roster employees.
Fixed roster.Weekday roster 4 shifts plus RDO per week, and two 12 hour weekend shifts. Overtime rostered to man units on
RDO (Fridays), with D/S Fridays utilised for panel maintenance.
500mSlight
In situ gas levels 12 - 18m3/tonne. Residual gas levels after drainage <2 - 8m3/tonne.
Predominantly methane.
No ventilation issues experienced in development due to provision of high capacity mine ventilation system.
High horizontal stress levels, typically 2 - 2.5 times vertical stress. Principal stress direction varies.
Long term, mature workforce.Labour turnover increasing.Labour availability limited.
Limited remaining mine life detracts recruitment.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M002MINE RESPONSES
2 years at current planned production levels.
In situ gas levels, with zones of boggy, low permeability coal. Outburst risk, with remote mining capability being
developed for low permeability zones.
6 X 2400mm roof bolts/metre with full mesh.2 X 1200mm steel rib bolts/metre/rib installed through 1.2m
long 2m high rib mesh. Noted problems experienced with full rib mesh sheets
when retracting CM from roadways.
6 X 2400mm roof bolts/metre with full mesh.2 X 1200mm steel or plastic rib bolts/metre/rib installed
through 1.2m long 2m high rib mesh.
6m or 8m mega bolts installed where required by TARP. Noted that rarely required, and generally only on longwall
installation faces.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M002MINE RESPONSES
3 - good.
2 - poor.Ribs generally good however rib mesh installed to minimise requirements for secondary rib repair.
3 - good
11.55kms
2.18M tonne
9.61kms
2.96M tonne
127.5m/week/CM (1/7/05 - 27/8/05)
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M002MINE RESPONSES
3 - good.Target 2.3MPOH, achieved 1.8MPOH August 2005m
Considered that not cutting constrained.Noted that monorail used for face services including;
cables, water, air, pump out and communications. Also noted that panel sequencing had to include provision for
overdriving roadways for monorails as part of development sequence, otherwise difficulty experienced when flitting
between places.
3+ - good.Joy HFX rigs reported as good.
Noted that at another mine within group that where the development crews had achieved 35 - 40m/12 hour shift
on a consistent basis over 4 days that operators complained of being exhausted due to demands of manual
handling roof and rib support materials.
3 - good.Temporary system being utilised while new mains
conveyor being installed.Mining process haulage constrained beyond 120m from
boot end, even with 2 SC in operation.Shuttle cars considered to be very inflexible.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M002MINE RESPONSES
2 - low.Roof bolting materials considered to be reasonable
however supply of rib bolt materials and ventilation ducting considered to be a problem.
1 - very low.Typically 5 shifts complete 150m panel advance.
Scheduling, sequencing and coordination of the panel advance and ancillary activities (eg; equipment
maintenance) considered to be the issue rather than labour availability.
3 - good.Typically one of two operating CM units scheduled for
maintenance on day shift on alternate days, Monday to Friday.
2 - low.Ageing infrastructure.
Annual development metreage reduced from 11.5km(1994/95) to 9.6km (2004/05).
Reduced number of development units offset by adoption of 7 day development operations.
Development requirements have reduced as mine has matured.
No statistics available from 1994/05 to compare development performance however considered that
development rates had improved as a result of improved maintenance practices with has resulted in higher levels of
equipment availability.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M002MINE RESPONSES
Redesign of mine to address surface constraints has increased development requirements by 10km for first
longwall block in new area.Deployment of additional development units coupled with
higher utilisation of development units (eg; increased working days).
Considered that difficult mining conditions would constrain development performance and that new technology and
equipment would be required to address future development challenges.
Face support activities.Coal clearance.
Ventilation - dust and gas emissions, extending ducting system.
Supplies - getting them to the face and onboard the continuous miner.
1 - Coal clearance.2 - Face support activities.
3 - Ventilation tubes and face ventilation quantities.4 - Supplies.
5 - Panel advance.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M002MINE RESPONSES
Medium diameter borehole drilled from mains to sub-mains (at other end of proposed gateroad) in the centre of each
gateroad and utilised as a return airway to eliminate use of ventilation ducting within development panel (ie; high pressure fan installed in sub-mains). Such medium
diameter drill holes would also provide gas drainage capability and obviate need for much of the small diameter
drilling done currently.Application of tunnelling technolgy and equipment
including continuous haulage systems, ventialtion and supply systems, and design of roadways for purpose
(rather than adopting roadways that suit the seam cross section).
Considered that highwall mining technology may also be successfully applied to roadway development.
Noted that place change mining could be successfully applied providing conditions suitable.
Also noted that in place, place changing with narrow continuous miner and bolter solves the roadway support constraint however does not address the coal clearance
issue.Also noted that any number of continuous miners could cut at rates of 6 - 8m/operating hour, however the problem is
roadway support and coal clearance. Availability of capital.
Commitment from industry to develop and trial equipment - noted that coal mine operators are not in the business of technology development, but rather prefer to apply new
technology developed elsewhere. Considered that operators failed to make strategic
investments in technology and as a consequence did not have the technology available to take advantage of
improved market conditions - spending too much time on recovery plans, labour shedding, and running down plant
and equipment.Further, operators considerd to be too risk adverse and too conservative in their approach to the development ime on
recovery and application of new technology and equipment.
Commitment of OEM sector to build and support new technology and equipment, potentially without fixed sales
contracts in place. Legislative requirements and the existing approvals
system were seen as major barriers to the timely development of new technology and equipment.
Existing roadway design and roadway profile paradigms limit our ability to contemplate new designs and profiles.
Poor record of successfully introducing and managing change.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M002MINE RESPONSES
Not sure whether we know what technology exists in other industry sectors that might be applied within underground
coal sector.In regards to long hole medium diameter drilling the
technology exists in the sewage and water supply sector and potentially be may readily applied (eg; Wollongong -
Port Kembla sewage pipeline). Further, existing technologies are available for drill guidance in coal mines,
together with dewatering coal slurries that would be generated from the drilling process.
Considered that the application of TBM technology may also be appropriate.
Kemcoal Beaver.Introduction of place change mining.
Introduction of dual miner/single crew super units.Development and introduction of monorail services
handling system.Klockner Becorit continuous haulage system.
Paurat miner trials.Cyclic mining systems.
Marietta and Goodman Borer continuous miners.Introduction of ABM20 and 12CM30.In place, place change mining trial.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M002MINE RESPONSES
Kemcoal Beaver - god concept, ventilation a problem in immediate face area, insufficient clearance above
machine.Place change mining - very successful with purpose
designed panel geometry, although condition dependant.Dual miner/single crew super units - parallel tasking of cutting and bolt processes, lot of walking, lot of capital.Monorail services handling system - very successful, practical, and huge advantage with mature workforce.
KB continuous haulage - good principle however system to complex (particularly hosing and cabling), excessive coal
spillage and poor steerage around cut throughs.Cyclic mining system - very successful, consistent
performance with minimal variation.Paurat miner - another complex machine, roadways too
high and narrow, not successfully applied.Marieta and Goodman borers - good roadway profile with
minimal support required, roadways still intact.12CM30 - single pass machine with onboard rigs got
people out of hazardous area, light years from hand held bolting, controlled roadway width.
ABM20 - closest thing to an integrated cuting and bolting machine.
In place, place changing - not given a reasonable chance.
Refer above.
2 - pursue mine related initiatives.Limited opportunities due to stage of development of mine
and existing development priorities, however will readily transfer proven technologies and systems from other
mines.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M002MINE RESPONSES
Materials handling system for Joy 12CM12.Major focus is on applying and standardising existing
technologies and systems.
Not at this stage.
Would appreciate feedback from study.
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0033 - 6.5m
3.2m
3.2m
5.0m5.0m
45m X 100m
45m X 100m and 30m X 100m.
0
2
7.51 deputy, 5 miners, 1 mechanical and 0.5 electrical trades.
ABM20
Hydramatic Series 2000 and Series 4000 bolting rigs, 4 roof bolting and 2 rib bolting rigs per CM.
Shuttle car and 1500mm conveyor
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M003MINE RESPONSES
1200mm conveyor.
Eimco and QDS Material pods (manual handling) and Capricorn Mining Supply Pod system.
Eimco and QDS Material pods (manual handling) and Capricorn Mining Supply Pod system.
7
8.5 hours N/S Mon - Thurs, 10 hours D/S and A/S Mon - Thurs.
12.5 hours Fri - SunMon - Thurs 3 shift rotating.
Fri - Sun 2 shift rotating.
450 - 650m in working areas.1:15 to 1:5.
3 - 6.5m3/tonne, predominantly CO2.
High horizontal stress regime.
140 employees currently, project 250 employees when longwall and 3 development units fully operational.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M003MINE RESPONSES
20 years.
High horizontal stress regime.High sulphur content in top portion of coal seam.High in-seam water make from adjacent, up dip
abandoned mine workings.Propensity for spontaneous combustion.
Minimum 6 X 2100mm roof bolts/m advance plus 2 X 4m JSS tendons each 3m advance.
Roof meshed with 4.8 X 1.2m mesh.3 X 1200mm mechanically anchored rib bolts/rib/m
advance. Ribs meshed with 1.7 X 2.4m galvanised rib mesh.
Minimum 6 X 2100mm roof bolts/m advance plus 2 X 4m JSS tendons each 3m advance.
Roof meshed with 4.8 X 1.2m mesh.3 X 1200mm mechanically anchored rib bolts/rib/m
advance. Ribs meshed with 1.7 X 2.4m galvanised rib mesh.
2 X 4m point anchored super strands installed at 3m spacing at TARP level 1.
An additional 1 X 8m super strand installed at 3m spacing at TARP Level 2 (post grouted).
If poor ground is expected roadways are developed under TARP Level 1 roof supports.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M003MINE RESPONSES
2 X 4m point anchored super strands installed at 3m spacing at TARP level 1.
An additional 1 X 8m super strand installed at 3m spacing at TARP Level 2 (post grouted).
If poor ground is expected roadways are developed under TARP Level 1 roof supports.
Secondary support regime for longwall gateroads to be finalised prior to longwall commencement.
2 - poor.
1 - difficult.Rapid deterioration of rib bolt holes results in loss of encapsulation therefore mechanical anchors utilised.
1 - difficult.
Mine not operational throughout period.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M003MINE RESPONSES
Average 105m/week/CM
Have only scheduled to 2011 although 57kms per annum projected at this time.
Have only scheduled to 2011 although 8.5Mt per annum projected at this time.
Currently scheduled at 320m/Cm/month. Minimum ground support is 12 bolts and one flexi bolt per metre advance.
The roadway is fully meshed on roof and ribs.Currently scheduled at 400m/Cm/month. Minimum ground support is 12 bolts and one flexi bolt per metre advance.
The roadway is fully meshed on roof and ribs.
3 - good.Machines are more than capable - not an issue.
Problem is tramming machines around, training issues, high floor bearing pressure, and lack of self levelling.
Target rate is 2.0MPOH.ABM20 not designed to move in 0.5m increments and
balance bolting/coal haulage cycle.
1 - very low.12 bolts/metre plus 1 X 4m tendon/m, fully meshed roof
and ribs.Poor ergonomic due to multiple bolting rigs.
Rigs are high maintenance.Complicated machines, flat out putting bolts where they
are required.Hole closure of rib bolt holes.
3 - good.Roof and rib bolting operations putting water onto floor
exacerbates soft floor conditions.Considered that industry should look at tyre profiles utilised
in other mining sectors to improve traction and minimise damage to floor.
While considered that continuous haulage may offer some benefits in conditions experienced it was noted that shuttle car based systems capable of 500m/week at other mines.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M003MINE RESPONSES
3 - 4, good to very good.3 hour maintenance window each day, face supplied in this
time.Considered that industry hasn't got on top of this issue yet as system is down while supplies are being replenished.
2 - low.Development only commenced recently, targeting 10 hour
panel moves.Noted that commencing panel moves at same point in
process was ineffective as it was likely that different crews would initiate move and therefore each crew would be doing different part of panel advance process. Intend to
commence move with same crew to ensure repeatability.Ventilation ducting considered a major problem and
development of a duct handling device was recommended.
3 - good.3 hour maintenance window each day.
Duplication of equipment and improved engineering design should allow "very good" levels of maintenance
effectiveness to be achieved.Currently 23% planned maintenance with 12 - 13%
breakdown delays.
3 - good.Delays of 11% experienced on Mains conveyor system
during August 2005 - major refurbishment planned.
Mine has had a checkered history with a number of owner operators, and has trialed a variety of strata support systems and mining methods to cope with the high
horizontal stress regime experienced.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M003MINE RESPONSES
Projected that 3 CM units will not be able to maintain longwall continuity at a level of 2.5 - 3.0Mtpa due to
development conditions and extent of Mains development required to access new working areas.
Seriously considering potential application of single entry development systems (Principal has extensive experience
in single entry drivage overseas).
Increased available cut time.Decrease in time to advance panel services.Reduction in rib support requirements due to
improvements in rib support technology.Improved efficiency in materials handling.
Increased available cut time.Decrease in time to advance panel services.Reduction in rib support requirements due to
improvements in rib support technology.Improved efficiency in materials handling.
Roof and rib bolting constraints.Coal haulage.
Ventilation.Supplies and materials.
1 - Roof and rib bolting.2 - Coal clearance.
3 - Materials handling.4 - Ventilation (of diesel equipment servicing unit).
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M003MINE RESPONSES
Single entry system that will utilise the same services system for both development and longwall operations - eg;
monorail services management system and monorail materials handling system.
Roadway to be profiled to mitigate stress effects.Extensible conveyor system.
On-board grouting system for grouting of tendons.Machine guidance systems - coal mines require greater
articulation than that normally incorporated in TBM systems.
Fully automated bolting system.Other tunnelling sector strata support systems.
Legislation eg; restrictions on use of aluminium (eg; monorails), single entry development systems, and the use
of booster fans underground.Hazardous zone limitations on gas levels and the ability to have a transformer and HT power supply in a single entry
return roadway.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M003MINE RESPONSES
R&D to look at the effects of roadway profiling and support requirements.
Self drilling roof bolts.Full automation of face bolting systems (including
cassettes).Application of TBMs.
Capture of face water make and returning outbye, or alternatively, application of dry drilling at the face.
Use of data logging and communications capabilities already existing on equipment.
Non blocking drill bits and steels (eg; on board "shearer" high pressure water pumps).
Simplification of machine electronics and hydraulics.
Development of profiled roadways.Self drilling bolts, particularly rib bolts, with full automation
of drilling/bolting.Continuous haulage
Surge car with mobile boot end.Sumps Shearer.
Surge car with Joy Sumps Shearer.Sumps Shearer and FCT.
Process control.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M003MINE RESPONSES
Surge cars - problems experienced with desorption of coal from standing coal in surge car behind continuous miner,
together with restriction on face ventilation due to additional equipment in roadway.
Sumps Shearer - good concept, high potential, good roadway profile, suitable platform for automated bolting system. Unfortunately, was imposed on mine without a dedicated project team and without suitable support.
Mobile boot ends - problems experienced getting around machine.
Necessity for involvement of people who are to utilise equipment in the development of the equipment and the
associated systems.Not possible to develop fit for purpose equipment suitable for all conditions and purposes - need to develop classes of equipment suitable for specified range of conditions.
Should develop one type of technology at a time, and not try to develop multiple technologies concurrently in one
system or demonstration.
3 - 4 , very interested in industry based incremental and step change initiatives.
Can't wait for industry to develop roadway development system/s.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M003MINE RESPONSES
Purpose built TBM.
Possibly, subject to corporate views on ownership of intellectual property.
Reluctant to pour money in for large scale step change - ACARP needs to successfully demonstrate capability to develop incremental technology improvements and earn
the right to grow.Establish a single entry task group to develop that concept -
potential to utilise the technology in the short to medium term to develop long term access for new mine area.
Involve mine site personnel and keep head office involvement to a practical minimum.
Lock in a long term development site eg; highwall.
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0042.6 - 4.0m
2.8m
5.4m
30m X 100m
1
142 deputies, 10 operators, 1 mechanical and 1 electrical
tradesmen - operate as super unit.
2 X 12CM3012CM12D machine on order, pending delivery.
1 X 12CM30 fitted with 4 Joy HFX roof bolters and 2 rib bolters.
1 X 12CM30 fitted with 2 Joy HFX roof bolters and 2 rib bolters.
New 12CM12D to be fitted with 4 Joy HFX roof bolters and 2 rib bolters.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M004MINE RESPONSES
2 X Joy 15SC shuttle cars discharging through Stamler feeder onto 1500mm wide gateroad conveyor.
Pods, with jib and carriers.Approximately 100m advance p set of pods.
7 days
8.75 hours Monday - Friday.12 hour shifts weekends.
8 week roster cycle with four crews rotating through roster on 2 week increments - A/S, N/S, D/S, 1 X Weekend plus 1
X week off.Monday - Friday N/S, D/S and A/S production.
Saturday - Sunday D/S production, with 5 man N/S maintenance crew on (fixed roster).
40 - 220m1:20 - 1:13
Very low
2 X 18m3/s auxiliary fans
Minor stress issues noted in association with geological structures and seam rolls.
Labour availability low -usually limited to employees being promoted or making career steps.
Low labour availability, but no issues experienced replacing limited numbers of personnel.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M004MINE RESPONSES
Development complete end 2009, mine development life cycle approximately 7 years.
Process based organisation structure with strong accountability for each of 3 processes (eg; development, longwall and surface). Mining and engineering personnel
jointly responsible with process teams.New mine, new workforce, positive culture.
4 X 1800mm rib bolts per 1.5m advance, installed through full roof mesh modules (1700mm).
1 X 1200mm rib bolt/rib/1.5m advance, increasing to 2 X 1200mm rib bolts/rib/1.5 metre advance at depths greater
than 175m. All rib bolts spot bolted.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M004MINE RESPONSES
2 X 4m tendons installed per 2.0m in geologically disturbed areas and longwall installation faces. Contractors utilised unless tendons installed as part of development cycle in
difficult conditions.
4 - very good.
3 - good.Although reducing to "poor" (2) at depths greater than
175m when 2 rib bolts installed/rib/1.5m advance.
4 - very good.Although reducing to "good" (3) at depth.
17kms (2004).1 X CM for 7 months, 2 X CM for 5 months.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M004MINE RESPONSES
3.5MPOH (1,200m/month) single unit.5.0MPOH, or 316m/week (1,400 - 1,600m/month) super
unit.4.6 days to complete a pillar cycle - super unit at 100m cut
throughs.
3 - good.Existing machines does not cut and load very well (E/W
conveyors)
3 - good.
1 - very low.22 year old shuttle cars, poor suspension and ergonomics.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M004MINE RESPONSES
3 - good.Handling of 1.7m wide mesh modules and vent tubes
considered problematic.
3 - good.Average 20 hours per move, range 13 - 24 hours.
Monorail handling system for services and vent tubes under consideration to expedite panel moves.
3 - good.Sequence driven maintenance process with A Heading
machine being serviced at 130m chainage (completion of cycle) during extension of services, with B Heading
machine being serviced on weekend maintenance shift.Continually challenging cost benefit of marginal
improvement in equipment availability versus maintenance downtime - typically operating at 89% availability.
3 - good.Good underground system (99.5% availability) impacted by
limited surface stockpiling (100,000 tonnes) and overland coal clearance system to CHPP.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M004MINE RESPONSES
Process driven.Good maintenance system.
Involvement of personnel in all facets of operation including process definition, new equipment specifications,
etc.Monitoring and measuring performance.
Adoption of 3 heading gateroads to support 400m wide longwall faces and longer longwall blocks.
Requirement to develop Mains due to delay in establishing highwall access with open cut mining.
Improved coal clearance system.Application of new technology including automation and
integrated cutting and bolting.Making things easier and lighter for men to use ie;
minimising fatigue (eg; lighter conveyor structure, pipes, bolts, mesh, hoses, cables).
Roof and rib bolting.Coal clearance.
Parallel tasks eg; extension of services.Belt extensions.
1 - Coal clearance.2 - Roof and rib bolting.
3 - Belt extensions.4 - Parallel tasks.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M004MINE RESPONSES
Integrated cutting and bolting with automated roof and rib bolting (and self drilling bolts).Continuous haulage system.
Extensible panel conveyor system with light weight structure.
Something other than steel mesh eg; plastic mesh on rolls.
Funding new development.Finding key people to develop system (product champions) and keeping those champions through entire development
process.Suitable site access and real estate to do so not on critical
path. People considered more receptive to change providing involved in improvement process, however may have
some difficulty sustaining high development rates unless processes are automated and/or made lighter and easier
to use.Availability of experienced and skilled personnel.
Legislation written to control worst case scenarios (eg; deep and gassy), not typical mines.
Globalisation of OEMs and the development of global products, with consequent unwillingness to develop and
support non standard equipment.Lack of flexibility and poor product support by OEMs.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M004MINE RESPONSES
Considered that many of the elements of an integrated, continuous cutting, bolting and coal clearance system
already exists, just need refinement and simplification (eg; ABM20).
Automation of bolting systems.Lightweight materials and structure.
Monitoring of both production and maintenance functions.Ergonomics - to improve operating environment for
personnel working in system.
1 - Ergonomics.2 - Coal clearance.
3 - Light weight and easy to use materials, structure, bolts, pipes, cables, etc.
Self drilling bolt (in association with CSIRO).Improved ergonomics on shuttle cars.
Introduction of 100m pillars in lieu of 30m and 70m pillars as previously utilised for wheeling around the pillar.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M004MINE RESPONSES
Self drilling bolt - limited success at this stage but shows a lot of potential.
Improved ergonomics - huge gains be made.Introduction of 100m pillars in lieu of 30m and 70m pillars - reduction in 100m panel advance by 0.8 shifts (15%) per
cycle.
OEMs have lack of knowledge of own products built overseas.
The identification of additional problems and issues when re-engineering equipment - need to persevere and follow
through to address all identified issues.Hard to do R&D at coal face in production critical
environment - need to have equipment developed to a higher standard before introducing into mine for trials.Need to simplify ABM20 and make it suitable for 2.8m
mining height.
4 - very interested in industry based step change initiatives.
Passionate about improving development, and has a workforce with a high degree of maturity and willingness to
trial new things.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M004MINE RESPONSES
Continuous haulage systems.
Yes, subject to corporate approval.
Would like to be involved in roadway development R&D process.
Should get workforce involved to ensure equipment and systems under development are kept simple, practical, and workable, and to ensure maximum buy in and ownership of
equipment under trial and development.Develop and maintain product champions.
Give feedback and keep us up to date with developments.Need to somehow improve the uptake of technology and equipment developed elsewhere - noted that automated
bolting rigs are utilised in salt mining operations overseas, while satellite bolters are used successfully in the US
underground coal sector.Should foster development of improved monitoring and
measuring systems with surface read out capability.
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
MOO57m
3.6m
5.2m
2 heading gateroads, typically 120 X 40m.Initially developed at 60 - 80m centres but pillars
lengthened to minimise intersections that may be affected during longwall extraction.
2
8ERZ controller, 5 miners, I mechanical and 1 electrical
tradesperson.Two trades often responsible for two separate gateroads
due to labour shortages.
12CM12
One 12CM12 fitted with 4 Hydramatic Series 4000 rib rigs and 2 Hydramatic rib bolting rigs, with second CM fitted
with 2 Hydramatic Series 4000 roof rigs on slides, 2 Hydramatic rib bolting rigs.Single pass roof bolting.
Rib rigs being modified to allow single pass drilling.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
MOO5MINE RESPONSES
1 Joy 15SC shuttle car.Stamler breaker feeder.
MBE to be trialed late 2005.
Materials delivered by Eimco and hand loaded onto continuous miner.
7
12 hours
4 on:5 off:5 on:4 off:5 on:5 off - rotating
90 - 200m1:10
CH4, Up to 5m3/t
No problems noted
Low horizontal stress regime.
Difficulty recruiting and maintaining labour Limited skills base among miners and trades.
No industrial issues.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
MOO5MINE RESPONSES
New mine development.
Highwall punch mine.Contractor responsible for all development.
1.8m long resin encapsulated bolts, 4 bolts/1.5m installed in a 2/2 pattern. W straps.
1.5m fully encapsulated rib bolts, 2 bolts/1.5m/rib. Spot bolted.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
MOO5MINE RESPONSES
2 X 8m tendons at 2m spacing in areas affected by geological structures.
3 - good.Support requirements for development considered "very
good" however primary support being installed during development has been designed to facilitate longwall
extraction. 3 - good.
Approximately 30% of roadways mined to date have required rib support levels typical of "difficult" to "poor" rib conditions, with balance comprising "good". Rib support
measures have been typically designed to facilitate longwall extraction.
3 - good.90% described as "good"
Floor affected by water if not properly managed.1.0m coal bottoms left on floor to minimise risk of exposing
soft floor strata.
10 -12kms
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
MOO5MINE RESPONSES
200m/week/CM
#NAME?
3 - good.12CM12 good cutting platform, consistently achieving
target development rate of 2m/hour.One 12CM12 will shortly require major overhaul.
2 - low.Not fit for purpose, with number of refinements necessary
to both roof and rib bolters.
3 - good.Haulage constraints evident when haulage distance
exceeds 120m and roadway floor conditions deteriorate.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
MOO5MINE RESPONSES
2 - low.High manual handling required for Eimco supplied bundles.
Materials supply system does not cater satisfactorily to changes in roof support regime and requirements for
changed hardware and/or support consumables.
1 - very low.Typically 30 hours plus per panel advance although two
recent moves have been completed in 22 - 24 hours.MBE to be trialed to facilitate faster panel moves.
2 - low.Frequent breakdowns due to overhaul deficiencies, exacerbated by lack of experienced tradespersons.
1 CM and 1 SC require further major overhaulContractors don't own equipment and are not prepared to
invest to improve maintenance due to limited contract term.
2 - low.In-pit conveyors (mains) not fully commissioned to date, whilst provision of panel conveyor systems (by Principal)
was also delayed and necessitated long haulage distances.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
MOO5MINE RESPONSES
Increased productivity.Improved up-time.
Increased equit availability.
Support phase and requirements (longwall specified).Services and panel extensions.
Coal clearance.
1 - Roof and rib support.2 - Services and panel extensions.
3 - Coal clearance.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
MOO5MINE RESPONSES
Continuous haulage.Integrated cutting and bolting.
Automated bolting.
TBM not considered relevant by one participant on basis that 12CM12 provides good cutting platform and good
roadway profile.
The level of caution evident throughout the industry to the commitment of expenditure and resources to the
development of new equipment and systems. The level of expenditure required to develop and trial new
equipment.Risks associated with development of new equipment -
what equipment and systems development sponsored by the Advanced Mining Program has been successfully
demonstrated and incorporated into the industry?Development priorities at mines and the risks associated
with trialing new equipment and systems when development constrained.
Inability to build effective relationships with non-performing OEMs.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
MOO5MINE RESPONSES
Self drilling roof and rib bolts.Ergonomics associated with installation of roof and rib
bolts - automation?Improving the working environment - dust control, noise
and lighting (noisy dust scrubbers).Effective utilisation of the data generated by existing and
future machine monitoring systems.Machine guidance - to reduce the level of skills required to productively operate a continuous miner (continuing skills
shortages experienced with operators and trades).Metalliferous strata support systems, hardware and
equipment.
One step bolting.
Development and deployment of effective "systems approach" management models necessary to underpin any
developments in technology and equipment.
Introduction of place change mining into an Australian mine.
Introduction of VA continuous haulage system (bridge conveyor) in South Africa.
Introduction of 7 day operations (South Africa).
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
MOO5MINE RESPONSES
Introduction of place change mining was frustrated by existing workplace culture which was embedded in its pre-
existing in-place mining system.Introduction of VA continuous haulage system was
successful however was not conducive to changes in mine design (eg; changed cut through and roadway spacings).
Managing the cultural change process.Introduce new equipment and systems into mines before
the organisational culture solidifies.
3 - very interested in industry based incremental change initiatives, particularly in relation to self drilling roof and rib
bolts.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
MOO5MINE RESPONSES
One step bolting.
Yes
Still room for technology development.Need to understand why the Sumps Shearer and FCT projects failed as the were considered to be worthwhile
developments.Still room for development and deployment of the "systems approach" and improved management of mining systems.
Higher capacity mines will be constrained by the mines ability to manage rib emissions - should therefore continue
to develop gas drainage equipment and systems.Development of systems to extract energy from
underground reserves without mining.
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M005B7m
3.6m
5.2m
2 heading gateroads, typically 120 X 40m
2
8ERZ controller, 5 miners, I mechanical and 1 electrical
tradesperson.Two trades often responsible for two separate gateroads
due to labour shortages.
12CM12
2 Hydramatic Series 4000 roof rigs on slides, 2 Hydramatic rib rigs.
Single pass roof bolting.Rib rigs being modified to allow single pass drilling.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M005BMINE RESPONSES
1 Joy 15SC shuttle car.
Materials delivered by Eimco.
7
12 hours
4 on:5 off:5 on:4 off:5 on:5 off - rotating
90 - 200m1:10
CH4, Up to 5m3/t
No problems noted
Low horizontal stress regime.
Difficulty recruiting and maintaining labour particularly during early phase of development where 5 and 6 day
rosters trialed.Accommodation constraints reported to limit establishment
of full manning complement while accommodation standards have affected labour retention.
Limited skills base among miners and trades. No industrial issues.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M005BMINE RESPONSES
New mine development.
Highwall punch mine.Contractor responsible for all development.
1.8m long resin encapsulated bolts, 4 bolts/1.5m installed in a 2/2 pattern. W straps.
1.5m fully encapsulated rib bolts , 2 bolts/1.5m/rib.Spot bolted.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M005BMINE RESPONSES
2 X 8m tendons at 2m spacing in areas affected by geological structures.
4 - very good.
4 - very good.More intense rib bolting required at depths greater than
150m, then "3" typical.
4 - very good.1.0m coal bottoms left on floor.
10 -12kms
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M005BMINE RESPONSES
200m/week/CM
3 - goodReliability and availability of 12CM12 low due to overhaul
deficiencies and continuing maintenance issues.
2 - low.Rib bolting the issue due to need to dual pass bolting. Rear
retract single pass modification to rib bolters underway.
2 - low.Low bolting intensity results in frequent delays waiting on shuttle car, particularly once haulage distance is in excess
of 80m.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M005BMINE RESPONSES
1 - very low.High manual handling of Eimco supplied bundles.
2 - low.Typically 22 - 24 hours to complete.
MBE being overhauled to facilitate faster panel moves.
2 - low.4 hour maintenance window each day.
Frequent breakdowns due to overhaul deficiencies, exacerbated by lack of experienced tradespersons.
2+ - low.In-pit conveyors (mains) not fully commissioned to date.
Not relevant.However noted that were achieving approximately 80% of budgeted performance levels, with performance affected by machine breakdowns, site access delays, manning
availability and low skills levels.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M005BMINE RESPONSES
Coal clearance.Materials supply.
Roof and rib support.
1 - Coal clearance.2 - Materials supply.
3 - Roof and rib support.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M005BMINE RESPONSES
Integrated cutting and bolting.Automated bolting.
Continuous haulage.Continuous panel conveyor extensions.
Arch profile - reduced support requirements.
Enclosed operator's cabin.Coal clearance along one side rather than centrally.
Roof bolting cassette and carousel as per metalliferous equipment.
Concertina panel belt.
Vacuum cleaner in lieu of coal haulage?Coal slurry system?
FCT or bridge conveyors.
Industrial issues associated with requirement for fewer people.
Technology gaps.Extending conveyor.
Skill levels and training requirements.Gas drainage technology (MRD).
Need to have better resolution of mining environment prior to mining.
Need flexibility in system to adjust to changes in geology.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M005BMINE RESPONSES
Automation.Mine/machine monitoring and tracking.
Training simulator for "play station" generation of miners and technicians.
Automation.Continuous haulage.
People/skills training (training simulators).
Updating hydraulics technology or finding alternate energy source (eliminating hoses full of high pressure fluid).Better application of current technologies - get rid of
pulleys and wires.
Application of systems approach.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M005BMINE RESPONSES
Good concept, should be part of way of doing things, however new technology, hardware and systems required
for step change.
Understand and monitor the process.Should be incorporated in development of new technology,
hardware and systems.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M005BMINE RESPONSES
Need to have higher proportion of practical, operations personnel on Underground Technical Committee and
RDTG.Improve profile of ACARP - little known on site.
Should be going overseas and into other industrial sectors to understand technological developments and how they
can be applied, particularly the metalliferous sector.
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0061.8m
0 - Mains development completed
0 - Panel development completed
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M006MINE RESPONSES
7 day
8 hours D/S, 10 hours A/S and N/S
7 day rotating roster.
440mBoth dip and cross grades in development.
18m3/tonne.Drained to less than 6m3/tonne for development
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M006MINE RESPONSES
Longwall extraction due to complete end 2005.
High temperatures being experienced underground at depth.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M006MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M006MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M006MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M006MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M006MINE RESPONSES
Unmanned development panels.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M006MINE RESPONSES
Transfer of appropriate technologies form high wall mining including machine guidance, machine monitoring and
equipment reliability.Automated bolting.
An alternate to automated bolting - 2 pass development and bolting (eg: wider roadways with in-place place
changing).Unmanned development panels.
Machine design to facilitate maintenance and breakdown repairs.
Larger ventilation ducting to reduce pressure losses and extend ventilation distances, enabling longer cut through
spacing (with larger ducting mounted on monorail system)
Continuous haulage system.Improved cut and bolt system.
Automation to remove men from immediate face area.
Continuous improvement and process improvement programs - getting people involved.
Utilisation of 14BU pick up loader behind CM.Place change mining.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M006MINE RESPONSES
Continuous improvement and process improvement - very successful due to involving people.
Utilisation of 14BU pick up loader behind CM - very successful, consider should be more broadly adopted if
continuous haulage systems not utilised.Place change mining - pillar sizes not suitable, depth of cut limited, insufficient headings to properly implement system,
auxiliary ventilation not conducive to adoption of system, corporate thrust with limited involvement of personnel.
Involvement of personnel who are intended to be utilised in system in the development and implementation of the
system.Need to consider the social implications associated with
the introduction of new technologies and mining systems, particularly in limited manning environments/systems.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M006MINE RESPONSES
Don't forget the people involved in the process.Don't be limited by peoples imagination.
Need to incorporate flexibility in working arrangements.
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0072.9 - 4.2m3.3 - 3.6m
3.3 - 3.6m
4.8m4.8m
Vary, typically 85m X 35M
130m X 35m
Nil - Mains development completed end 2004.Previously 1 Mains development unit.
1 typically.1 contract unit to commence shortly to assist complete
gateroad development mid 2006 prior to transfer to new mine.
81 ERZ controller, 7 operators (operator manning levels
includes for all absenteeism).No tradesmen allocated to panels - on call basis plus
planned maintenance shift/day.
91 ERZ controller, 8 operators (operator manning levels
includes for all absenteeism).No tradesmen allocated to panels - on call basis plus
planned maintenance shift/day.Previously 12CM323 (originally 12CM30 but retrofitted with
shovel in lieu East/West conveyor).
12CM32 (originally 12CM30 but retrofitted with shovel in lieu East/West conveyor).
4 Aro Series 4000 hydraulic bolters on each CM, 2 Aro Series 5000 hydraulic rib borers.
2.1m roof bolts, 1.2m rib bolts - single pass drilling.
4 Aro Series 2000 hydraulic bolters on each CM, 2 Aro Series 5000 hydraulic rib borers.
2.1m roof bolts, 1.2m rib bolts - single pass drilling.4 roof bolting rigs and 2 rib bolting rigs can be operated
simultaneously with 4 operators due to significant improvements to on-board ergonomics and machine
hydraulics.Mesh modules racked against rib in bundles of 20
immediately behind miner and walked forward.1 Joy 15SC32 delivering to MBE or Stamler feeder
breaker.MBE fitted with panel DCB and conveyor stand inserting
mechanism.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M007MINE RESPONSES
1 Joy 15SC32 delivering to MBE.MBE fitted with panel DCB and conveyor stand inserting
mechanism.
2 cassettes per CM - colour coded for steel and or plastic rib bolts/dowels.
42m advance per two cassettes
2 cassettes per CM - colour coded for steel and or plastic rib bolts/dowels.
42m advance per two cassettes
1 CM unit 7 days per week, 1 CM 5 days per week
12 hour shift 7 day roster, 9 hour shift Mon-Fri roster
85 -210m30
Very low, no outburst risk.Some limited experience with H2S
No issues reported
No issues reported
No issues reported, although noted that part of mines success was recruitment of clean skins
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M007MINE RESPONSES
Development complete mid 2006 and transferred to new mine.
Good people, good attitudes, no problem accepting and implementing change, continuous improvement,
involvement of and ownership by personnel, greenskins.High underground standards from Day 1, particularly
roadworks.
2.1m long resin encapsulated bolts, 6 - 8 bolts/m depending upon strata conditions (either 6 bolt or 6/2 bolt
pattern).4.5m X 1.2m welded mesh roof modules.
1.2m long resin encapsulated rib bolts, 2 bolts/m/rib.1.8m X 1.5m mesh sheets installed on ribs.
2.1m long resin encapsulated bolts, 6 - 8 bolts/m depending upon strata conditions (either 6 bolt or 6/2 bolt
pattern). In some instances 10 bolts/m (6/4 pattern) required.
4.5m X 1.2m welded mesh roof modules. 1.2m long resin encapsulated rib bolts , 2 bolts/m/rib and
1.8m X 1.5m mesh sheets on chain pillar side of roadways. 3 cuttable 1.2m dowels/m/rib spot bolted on block side.
2 X 8m Mega bolts or JSS super strands installed per 2m in Zone B conditions (8 roofbolts/metre) - approximately
10% of Mains development.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M007MINE RESPONSES
2 X 8m Mega bolts or JSS super strands installed per 2m in Zone B conditions (8 roofbolts/metre).
3 - good.
1 - difficult.
3 - good.300mm of coal left on floor to minimise risk of cutting into
2Mpa floor.
11.2 kms (1995/96) W straps.
3 CM units, 5 day operationLongwall commenced during 1996
11.1 kms.1 CM 7 day operation, 1 CM 50% utilised on 5 day week
4.1Mt
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M007MINE RESPONSES
218m/week (7 days)
Not relevant - mine expected to complete development mid 2006 prior to transfer to new mine.
4 - very good.12CM32 good cutting platform.
Consider that 12CM32 as modified is process constrained, not cutting constrained.
4 - very good.Mine has made number of major improvements to roof and
rib bolting systems employed on 12CM32 under continuous improvement philosophy.
3+ - good.MBE used although stationary between panel moves.
No problems for first 100 - 110m from boot (130m pillars).300mm coal bottoms left to protect soft floor.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M007MINE RESPONSES
4 - very ggod.Supply cassettes can be changed between cars.
Use a mine designed QDS jib for installing and changing out cassettes.
3 - good.12 -20 hours to complete 130m panel move.
MBE fitted with conveyor stand insert mechanism. DCB on MBE.
Travelling roadway driven first and services installed during drivage of conveyor roadway.
3 - good.Recently went to a single CM 7 day operation as opposed
to previous two CMs on 5 day basis - push for development metres.
Now utilises one 12 hour maintenance shift (minimum) per week on mine wide basis, with maintenance issues now
being addressed more effectively.
3 - good.Over 1,000 hours lost in 2004 due to conveyor delays.
Major campaign implemented to address conveyor delays. Adoption of one 12 hour maintenance shift (minimum) per
week on mine wide basis now allows conveyor maintenance issues to be addressed more effectively.
No significant change in annual development between 1995/96 and 2004/05 although number of operating units
has reduced from 3 to 1.5, while roof and rib support intensity has increased markedly.
Wide spread adoption of continuous improvement techniques to address machine design deficiencies,
particularly in respect to operator ergonomics associated with support and ventilation elements. Has markedly
reduced workplace injuries and improved labour availability.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M007MINE RESPONSES
Same as Mains development.
Currently 22 - 25m/shift, envisage 30 -40m/shift available with enhanced CMs (ABM25S).Self drilling roof and rib bolts.
Full automation of bolting processes.Man less shuttle cars.
Integrated cut and bolt with ABM25S.
Coal haulage.Consumables supply.
Roof bolting (unless self drilling bolts successful).Noted that increased cutting rates are likely to significantly increase noise levels in the immediate face area to levels
which cannot be reasonably tolerated by humans. Therefore need to work towards full remote operation with
man less faces.Envisage total change to work processes with 2 man crews primarily engaged in consumables supply and extension of
services.
1 - Roof bolting.2 - Coal haulage.
3 - Consumables supply.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M007MINE RESPONSES
Fully automated cutting and bolting machine with continuous haulage system, 2 men/panel for supply and
services.Longer pillars.
Upgraded Sump Shearer (although Joy not committed to such).
TBM - but what about cut throughs?Self drilling bolts.
Bolter automation including carousel.Noted that envisage that current cutter head design will
underpin equipment over next 5 - 7 years.
Don't have OEMs available who will readily commit to making necessary machine modifications, adaptations, new designs associated with continuous improvement
process.Getting industry champions to manage the technology
development process. Availability of people and access to mines to develop, trial
and modify equipment.Need to look outside the square because the integrated cutting and bolting machine needs to be designed from
ground up and won't look like a conventional CM.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M007MINE RESPONSES
1 - self drilling bolts.2 - automated bolting and carousels.
3 - further development of FCT, including incorporation of services.
4 - supplying CM.5 - flexible ducting for exhausting ventilation applications
and/or development of forcing ventilation system including enhanced dust and gas capture/control.
6 - development of improved tendon installation rigs to facilitate wider adoption of long tendons.
Mine has successfully utilised continuous improvement techniques to make significant improvement to CMs and
associated systems, including; 12CM32 shovel adaptation, on-board ergonomics, rib protection system, semi-
automation of bolters, mapping of roof strata during roof drilling process, on-board hydraulics (6 bolters can operate simultaneously), on-board electricals (one FLP enclosure
in lieu of 7 as supplied), removal of ATRS, on -board monitoring data transmission to surface, on-board 2 way radio and telephone, improved maintenance access, on-board ventilation ducting, materials handling and supply
systems.All enhancements now being incorporated in redesigned
ABM25S.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M007MINE RESPONSES
Highly successful.
Getting ergonomics right.Involvement of workforce in continuous improvement process, with high corporate support for implementing
agreed improvements (estimate being prepared of expenditure committed to CM improvements).
Use of "counters" rather than machine pressure sensing to improve automation of bolting processes.
2 - 3, interested in pursuing mine related development issues and industry based inremental change initiatives.
Demonstrated track record.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M007MINE RESPONSES
New ABM25S will probably see current and new mine site out (ie; anticipated life of new mine 8 years).
Industry communications need to be significantly upgraded to facilitate transfer of technology and systems across
mine leases - few opportunities to get together with industry peers to workshop problems and develop new
ideas and technology.Need to develop collaborative working arrangements with
selected OEMs.R&D should be focussed on developing technology and
systems that can be applied and of benefit to all segments of industry (eg; fast CM, self drilling bolts, bolter
automation) rather than to that technology that has limited application (eg; ACBM) - direct money to the right areas.
When selecting trial sites and projects need to ensure that target organisations have high levels of corporate commitment and support for project together with
organisational values and culture that will foster continuous improvement.
Need to develop and agree an industry wide R&D strategic plan.
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M008Average 4.0m
3.4m
3.4m
5.4m5.4m
Varying 35m X 45m - 100m
Varying 26m - 43m X 150mNote that chain pillar width increases with depth.
1
1
8 1 deputy, 5 operators, 1 mechanical and 1 electrical trades.
8 1 deputy, 5 operators, 1 mechanical and 1 electrical trades.
ABM20Mark3 Height modified to suit mining height.
ABM20Mark3 Height modified to suit mining height.
4 X Hydramatic Series 4200 Prismatic roof bolters.2 X Hydramatic rib bolters bolter - LHS rib bolter rotary
actuated for ergonomics.Gripper jaws to be fitted for installation of tendons.4 X Hydramatic Series 4200 Prismatic roof bolters.
2 X Hydramatic rib bolters bolter - LHS rib bolter rotary actuated for ergonomics.
Gripper jaws to be fitted for installation of tendons.
1 X Joy 15SC discharging onto 1050mm Mains conveyor.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M008MINE RESPONSES
1 X Joy 15SC discharging onto 1200mm panel conveyor.
Cassettes - roof and rib bolts, and plates.Mesh and chemicals in separate cassettes.
Cassettes - roof and rib bolts, and plates.Mesh and chemicals in separate cassettes.
7 days per week.
8.5 hour, 10 hour and 12 hour shifts.
Dayshift 5 X 8.5 hour shifts fixed roster.A/S and N/S 4 X 10 hour rotating roster Monday -
Thursday.Weekend 12 hour rotating Friday - Monday.
Excellent roster reported.
75m in Mains increasing to 270m inbye end of gateroads.1:20 - 1:15
Limited gas reported in development, although longwall experiences gas migration from other seams during
longwall extraction.
21.5m3/s auxiliary fans - no problems reported.
Guttering experienced in area affected by coalescing seams.
Principal stress parallel to gateroads.
Increasing turnover reported due to new opportunities arising closer to coast.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M008MINE RESPONSES
10 -20 years.
No significantly differentiating factors reported.
4 X 2100mm roof bolts/metre with mesh modules, increasing to 6 X 2100mm roof bolts/metre at intersections.
1 X 1200mm steel rib bolts/metre/rib spot bolted.
4 X 2100mm roof bolts/metre with mesh modules, increasing to 6 X 2100mm roof bolts/metre at intersections.
1 X 1200mm steel rib bolts/metre/rib spot bolted.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M008MINE RESPONSES
2 X 6m tendons/2 metres being installed in face areas as part of development process in area affected by coalescing
seams, and other areas as determined by TARPs - QDS bolting rig being sourced to enable tendons to be installed
as secondary supports.
3 - good.Generally good excepting in areas affected by coalescing
seams and increased horizontal stress levels.
3 - good.
3 - good.Seam rolls and clay band experienced in floor and unless CM operator attentive can quickly cut into and bog in soft
underlying floor.
Only started mine operations late 2004.
80m/week.Mains generally wet, with number of mine construction
activities completed during development (eg; overcasts, driveheads).120m/week.
Primary unit, 5 days per week.14.9kms (2004).
7.39kms YTD (2005) - affected by 8 week suspension of one CM for longwall changeout.
Anticipate 12 - 13kms for calendar 2005.
3.38M tonne (2004).1.35M tonne YTD (2005).
120m/week.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M008MINE RESPONSES
160m/week.Will increase as gain experience dealing with coalescing
zone.
13.5kms/annum.
4.5M tonnes.Wider longwall face, maintain same development rate.
Maintain same development rate.
Maintain same development rate.
3 - good.Achieving target of 3.0MPOH in gateroads and 2.4MPOH
in Mains development.First 60m of development in cycle bolting constrained then
SC constrained.
3 - good.Mesh carrier could be improved.
3 - good.Road conditions could be a constraint at times.
Noted that 2 shuttle cars utilised behind each continuous miner, and 150m pillars.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M008MINE RESPONSES
4 - very good.Machines aren't designed for modular loading of materials.
3 - good.No breaker feeder and two auxiliary fans and boot ends allows "ghost" belt move to be part completed prior to
completion of pillar cycle. Have also introduced contract labour to complement own
labour during panel moves.
3 - good.Availability reported as quite good, 2 X 12 hour
maintenance shifts per panel, Tuesday and Thursday D/S.
3 - good.Availability >90%.
Additional days worked per week, and changed shift duration.
New mine established with new mine practices including; employee selection, hot seat change, management
systems, data recording and performance monitoring.
Fit for purpose equipment.Panel design and layout.
Installation of ancillary services (eg: overcast, stoppings) in parallel with mining operations.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M008MINE RESPONSES
Fit for purpose equipment.Panel design and layout.
Installation of ancillary services (eg: overcast, stoppings) in parallel with mining operations.
Use monorail services handling system including ventilation ducting.
Increased longwall output, greater longwall float required.Inability to complete exploration by surface based
methods, therefore increasing reliance on exploration by continuous miner, therefore greater development float
required as a contingency.New seam, dif ferent equipment, higher roadway section
allowing reintroduction of monorail services handling system.
Reintroduction of monorail services handling system.Establishment of spare panel to allow full "ghost" panel
moves to be completed in parallel with continuous production.
Coal clearance (breaker feeder would make a difference).Supplies.
Secondary support.Panel preparation.
Drivehead installations.Travel times.
Geological conditions and interpretation of exploration data.
5 - 6MPOH considered possible with existing continuous miner, 1 shuttle car, and monorail services handling
equipment.
1 - Geological conditions.2 - Secondary support.3 - Panel preparation.
Noted that there was enough technology available to take coal clearance out of the equation.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M008MINE RESPONSES
Advancing longwall with pump packed gateroads, possibly 2 pump packed roadways in maingate.
Monorail mounted services handling and/or CM mounted scrubber to eliminate requirement for handling ventilation
tubes.Modular system for supplies.
Automated bolting.Separate development functions to allow each to be
separately accountable.TBM with flexible roadway profile.
Hoseless continuous miner (to remove major downtime).Automate manual handling, or improve fitness of
employees to enable manual handling to be fully adopted (ie; don't compromise, all of one).
Hard rock mining technologies such as long hole jumbos and shotfiring.
Different roof and rib support systems such as shotcreteing or temporary passive support systems (eg; modular
concrete rings as used in tunnelling).Box cutting and/or drift access to gateroads in shallow
mines in lieu of developing Mains. Elimination of cut throughs with adoption of wide, pump
packed segregated roadways.
Money.Existing paradigms which favour retrofitting space age technology on 50 year old platforms (eg; continuous
miners), and the associated issues of design compromise.Legislation and approvals processes.
Overcoming IS issues with application of robotics and automation.
Developing a higher skilled workforce able to operate and maintain high technology equipment.
Emerging issue in respect to mandatory provision of forward support systems for use of road headers in
roadway development.
Considered that significant gains can be realised from the development and refinement of existing technologies
coupled with the rigorous application of process control and improved management of people.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M008MINE RESPONSES
Machine guidance systems utilising exploration data bases, on-board computers, and seam following
techniques for automatic machine guidance and steering.Hoseless continuous miner.
Automation and/or robotics of manual handling systems.Integration of high wall mining techniques and small
diameter ventilation shafts to allow single entry mining systems to be employed.
Monorail mounted materials supply system.Bridge conveyor or monorail mounted continuous haulage
system.Monorail mounted services system.
Forward injection of strata with strata binder as a roof and rib support mechanism - possibly incorporating roadway
slotting.
Exploration and mapping and the interface of geological data bases with development systems to facilitate machine
guidance systems.Hoseless technology.
Automation and robotics.Modularisation of machine components to allow rapid
replacement and remote repair.Use of aluminium underground.
Introduction of cut and flit mining.Monorail services handling systems.
Introduction of ABM20s.Extension of rib support and ergonomics to ABM20s.
Development tail ends.Tapered pillars.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M008MINE RESPONSES
Cut and flit - in right conditions good, but has its limitations, not sure whether it can be successfully applied to 2 entry
gateroad development, too site specific.Monorail services - extremely successful, however at
engineering limit in respect to managing steeper grades.ABM20 - successful, high productivity integrated mining
system.However too big, difficult to tram, poor breakaways, heavy
on maintenance. Limited to what they can do regarding alignment and spacing of bolts, as are other current
generation continuous miners. Took 3 years to retrofit rib bolting enhancements to operator's standards.
Development tail ends - suited to high seam application and roof mounted gateroad conveyors.
Tapered pillars - can be successfully applied to site specific geotechnical parameters, and reduce development
requirements.
Cut and flit - in right conditions good, but has its limitations, not sure whether it can be successfully applied to 2 entry
gateroad development, too site specific.Monorail services - extremely successful, however at
engineering limit in respect to managing steep gradients. Is limited in its application as requires predrivage some 500m
of roadway before installing system, and also requires angled cut throughs to be effective.
Could be further integrated with longwall to provide for reuse of monorail system during retreat.
Materials handling - handling of mesh sheets still problematic.
Development tail end - initially set up with extensible boot end but found that couldn't service miner beside conveyor.
Big piece of gear however managed transition from roof mounted structure in high roadway to floor mounted tail
end very well. Limit on storage capacity in LTU.Process driven approach to installing longwall, roof
mounted conveyor in high roadway - 10 hours for 100m belt extension.
Tapered pillars - linear relationship in roadway spacing as depth increases, however extent of horizontal stress may not be linear. Longwall requirements to store equipment in
cut throughs may limit minimum pillar dimensions at shallower depths.
3 - very interested in industry based incremental change initiatives.
New seam to be accessed by 2009, require proven concepts to be available within 2 years so that they can be
incorporated in planning.History of pushing boundaries at mine, however now a
margin sensitive operation and would only be prepared to pursue developments if they would make a positive
contribution and could be done without threatening mine's critical path.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M008MINE RESPONSES
Monorail services system.Geological exploration and machine guidance systems.
Automated bolting.Single entry development systems.
Advancing longwalls and roadway pump packing systems.
Yes.
Considers that whole of body vibration is an emerging OH&S issue of significance, and that ACARP should
facilitate research into machine ergonomics particularly in relation to operation of RTVs.
Also considers that ACARP should research use of alternate lightweight materials, and address legislative issues with respect to use of aluminium underground.
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0099.0m3.3m
3.3m
4.9m4.9m
39.8m X 130m
39.8m X 120m
2 Dual unit, 3 heading configuration.
2Independent units, 2 entry gateroads.
8Deputy plus 7 (or 8) operator technicians, with up to 2
mechanical and 2 electrical qualified operator technicians within each crew.
2 X ABM20 Mark III
4 Hydramatic Series 4000 roof bolting rigs and 2 Hydramatic Series 4000 rib bolting rigs per machine.
1 X 15SC shuttle car per continuous miner discharging onto a Stamler feeder breaker.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M009MINE RESPONSES
Cassette system for roof and rib bolts and plates, mesh in separate cassettes with chemical anchors palletised.
40m advance per set of bolt cassettes.
7
12
4 on:5 off:5 on:4 off:5 on:5 off - rotating.
250m - 300mFlat - 1:30.
In situ gas levels in current area 2 - 4.8m3/tonne, 50:50 CH4:CO2.
Future areas contain 16 - 18m3/tonne, predominantly CO2.
1 X 18.3m3/s and 1 X 22m3/s auxiliary fans.
TBA
High labour turnover reported, particularly among staff. No experienced labour available.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M009MINE RESPONSES
20+ years.
Surface constraints and adjacent mine workings limit extent of longwall mining areas and length of longwall
blocks. 3 separate longwall domains.Part of workings overlain by water bearing old mine
workings.Lack of surface exploration due to surface constraints.Thick seam, only partially extracted due to coal quality.
Employees paid an annual salary which incudes productivity component.
6 x 2.4m roofbolts/metre and 2 X 1.8m rib bolts/metre/rib in best strata conditions.
Roof and ribs fully meshed with mesh modules (roof) and 1.8m high rib mesh sheets.
As strata conditions deteriorate 4m JSS tendons are introduced in addition to standard roof support, and may be
replaced with 8m tendons if face conditions further deteriorate.
8m Mega bolts as required.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M009MINE RESPONSES
8m Mega bolts installed 1/1.0m on block side of maingate roadway prior to panel advance, together with mega
bolting of maingate and tailgate intersections at 2/1.0m spacing.
1 - 3, diificult to good. Highly variable roof conditions experienced.
1 - difficult.
1 - difficult.Soft, volcanic tuff floor strata underlying coal seam, readily
affected by face and seam water.
Typically 80 - 90m/week/CM.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M009MINE RESPONSES
3 - good.3.0 - 3.5MPOH targeted in best strata conditions.
2 - 3, low to good.6 roof bolts and 4 rib bolts installed after each metre of
advance.Bolting rigs described as fit for purpose, however support
measures are intensive.
3 - good.2 shuttle cars mined per metre advance.
System becomes haulage constrained 70m from boot end.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M009MINE RESPONSES
4- - very good.40 metres/set of cassettes.
15 - 20 minutes to change cassette depending upon location in pillar cycle.
1 - very low.48 - 72 hours typical duration, best 24 hours.
1800mm roof mounted, bolted Mains conveyor structure, 130m extensions.
Sequencing issue with 3 heading 2 CM unit configuration, one CM may be stood down for up to 5 days awaiting completion of development sequence by second CM.
3 - good.2 hour maintenance window each day (Mon - Fri) used for routine inspection, testing and servicing. One CM stood
down each day on alternate basis (Mon - Fri) for further 5 hour maintenance window.
26 - 28% utilisation reported, with reliability factor of 48 - 52% also reported.
Contractors reported to achieve 45% utilisation.
4 - very good.
Upgrade of continuous miners to ABM20 Mark III series.Refurbishment of shuttle cars.Bigger capacity transformers.
Improved supply and logistics system.7 day operations (as opposed to 5 day operations
previously).
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M009MINE RESPONSES
Separation of dual mining unit to two discrete units.Projected that 4 CM units will be required on continuing
basis.Improved roadway maintenance and reduced operational
delays.Rectification of inherent design issues associated with new
mine establishment.
Roof and rib bolting.Coal clearance.
Roadway conditions, and a lack of resources to apply to roadway repair and maintenance.
Panel advances.Logistics and supplies
1 - Bolting.2 - Coal clearance/roadway conditions.
3 - Panel advances.4 - Logistics and supplies.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M009MINE RESPONSES
Self drilling bolts and/or roof nails.TBM.
Continuous haulage system.Automated bolting systems.
Money, and budget timing issues.Ability to justify project to corporate, and the ability to prove
availability and reliability of equipment.Everyone already too busy - getting peoples' time and commitment - inability to find a dedicated champion.
Projected longwall discontinuities and inability to take equipment and resources from critical development.
Availability of spare equipment.Variable and difficult ground conditions impacting
demonstration and trials.Legislation constraints and the approvals process.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M009MINE RESPONSES
Automation and robotics.
Roof and rib bolting - self drilling bolts - automation - elimination of hydraulic hoses.
Improved maintenance design incorporated into equipment.
Roadway maintenance - dealing with coal and clay slurries and pastes.
Operating Excellence projects - process improvement and control.
Use of auger holes for roadway dewatering.Use of different additives to assist in roadway stabilisation
and treatment.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M009MINE RESPONSES
Operating Excellence initiatives - some success, particularly the electro-hydraulic cable bolting machine for
installation of secondary supports.Roadway maintenance improvement initiatives - limited
success.
A stitch in time saves nine! - if something indicates an emerging problem, fix it immediately before it gets out of
control.Need for commonly accepted and agreed standards and
trigger points that are observed by all.
2 - 3, interested in pursuing mine related and industry based incremental change initiatives
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M009MINE RESPONSES
Roadway maintenance initiatives.Horizon control for continuous miners.
Yes, but unsure about management.
On the money with regards to current project - all mines are development constrained.
Need to establish communication and networking processes to enable transfer of experiences, learnings and
ideas.Conduct of regular roadway development conferences.Fostering corporate support for the involvement of site
based personnel in such conferences.
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M009B9.0m3.3m
3.3m
4.9m4.9m
39.8m X 130m
39.8m X 120m
2Independent units, 2 entry gateroads.
8Deputy plus 5 operators, 1 mechanical and 1 electrical
trades.
2 X 12CM30
4 Joy HFX roof bolting rigs and 2 Joy HFX rib bolting rigs per machine.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M009BMINE RESPONSES
1 X 10SC32 shuttle car per continuous miner discharging onto a Stamler feeder breaker.
Cassette system for roof and rib bolts and plates, mesh in separate cassettes with chemical anchors palletised.
40m advance per set of bolt cassettes.
5 (Monday to Friday crew)3 (weekend crew)
8.5 - 9.5 Monday to Friday.12 hour weekend D/S Friday to Sunday.
9 day fortnight.
250m - 300mFlat - 1:30.
In situ gas levels in current area 2 - 4.8m3/tonne, 50:50 CH4:CO2.
Future areas contain 16 - 18m3/tonne, predominantly CO2.
Some labour turnover reported, as typical of mine contractors, although have developed a core of long term
employees.No experienced labour available.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M009BMINE RESPONSES
2 years remaining on existing contract.
Contractor utilised to complete initial mine development and to commence gateroad development.
8 x 2.4m roofbolts/metre and 2 X 1.8m rib bolts/metre/rib in typical strata conditions.
Roof and ribs fully meshed with mesh modules (roof) and 1.8m high rib mesh sheets.
Noted that client currently providing roof and rib mesh that only provided an effective 900mm length in lieu of 1200mm
effective length previously adopted. Consequently bolt spacings were at 900mm spacing rather than 1000mm as
nominated.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M009BMINE RESPONSES
8m Mega bolts installed 1/1.0m on block side of maingate roadway prior to panel advance, together with mega
bolting of maingate and tailgate intersections at 2/1.0m spacing.
1 -3, difficult to good.Highly variable roof conditions experienced.
1 - difficult.
1 - difficult.Soft, volcanic tuff floor strata underlying coal seam, readily
affected by face and seam water.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M009BMINE RESPONSES
Target 110m/week/CM, equivalent to 450m/month/CM including 2 panel advances/month.
Achieved 130m/week/CM last week.
3 - good.Average 1.5 - 1.6MPOH, with range of 0.84 - 1.99MPOH
on monthly basis since commencement (3 years).
3 - good.
3 - good.2 shuttle cars mined per metre advance.
The 10SC32 was reported to have a higher ground clearance than other shuttle cars used at the mine which reduced the risk of bogging in the soft floor conditions.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M009BMINE RESPONSES
3 - good.20 - 30 metres/set of pods
10 - 15 minutes to change pods.10 sheets of mesh installed on CM at a time from mesh
carrier.
1 - very low.40 - 48 hours typical duration.
1500mm longwall conveyor installed in 120m extensions.Duration of panel advance impacted by requirement to install 120 X 8m mega bolts as secondary support in
conveyor roadway prior to advance. Development sequence modified to allow this work to proceed in parallel
with development in adjacent heading.
3 - good.1 shift per week (Thursday D/S) scheduled maintenance plus during panel advances and weekends if required.Average utilisation 48 - 50%, range 33.4 - 59.3% on
monthly basis project to date (3 years).Roof and rib bolting rigs changed out on a preventative
maintenance cycle.
4 - very good.
Integration issues with client continue to impact performance. Target 3.5 - 4.0MPOH however typically
achieve 2.0 - 2.5MPOH.Improved familiarity with machines.
Operators becoming more experienced and capable of dealing with the conditions as experienced.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M009BMINE RESPONSES
Introduction of 7 day operations with second weekend crew.
Unknown geology may prove to be problematic.
Roof and rib bolting.Coal clearance.Supplies to face.
Other process work including secondary support, services and roadway maintenance.
1 - Roof and rib bolting.2 - Other process work including secondary support,
services and roadway maintenance.3 - Coal clearance.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M009BMINE RESPONSES
Self drilling bolts - automated bolting systems - minimisation of associated manual handling.
TBM.Continuous haulage system.
Monorail mounted services - pantech going the other way.Continuous parallel processes.
Legislation constraints and the approvals process.Authority to mine - gas drainage - making it safe to mine.
Ventilation.Real time monitoring.
Having personnel available to support the high productivity, automated mining system.
Ensuring equipment supplied "fit for pit".
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M009BMINE RESPONSES
Metalliferous mining technology eg; bolting and drilling.Metalliferous mining OEMs.
Robotics.Get out and look at other industry sectors to identify
potential technologies.Roadway maintenance.
Supporting roadways - roof and rib bolting - self drilling bolts - automation.
Elimination of manual handling.Roadway maintenance - minimising impact on equipment and personnel eg; transmission, steering, cable damage,
personnel injuries.
Operating Excellence projects - optimisation of primary and secondary support installation.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M009BMINE RESPONSES
Some success spending money on electro-hydraulic secondary support rigs to get away from hand held
secondary support installation, together with optimisation of the primary and secondary bolting phases..
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M009BMINE RESPONSES
Picked the right issue with the current project.Communicating outcomes of research and improvement
initiatives to industry to prevent the reinvention of the wheel.
Developing a body of knowledge of best practice.
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0102.8 - 3.2m2.8 - 3.2m
2.8 - 3.2m
5.2m5.2m
45m between adjacent headings, cut throughs vary.
2
Panel development yet to commence.
71 deputy (supervisor), 6 operator maintainers.
7 - when panel development commences.1 deputy (supervisor), 6 operator maintainers.
1 X 12CM30, 1 X ABM20
ABM20s when panel development commences.
4 Joy HFX roof bolters and 2 Joy HFX rib bolters.
As above when panel development commences.
Shuttle cars delivering to breaker feeder.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M010MINE RESPONSES
As above when panel development commences.
Eimco and trailers.
Eimco and trailers when panel development commences.
5 days per week currently, intend to move to 7 day roster.
9 hours
Fixed roster.4 shifts/week plus overtime on RDO.
Intend to move to 7 day roster.
500mSlight
In situ gas levels 12 - 18m3/tonne. Residual gas levels after drainage <2 - 8m3/tonne.
Predominantly methane.
No ventilation issues experienced in development due to provision of high capacity mine ventilation system.
High horizontal stress levels, typically 2 - 2.5 times vertical stress. Principal stress direction varies.
Labour turnover increasing.Labour availability limited.
No industrial lost time to date.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M010MINE RESPONSES
20 years at current planned production levels.
In situ gas levels, with zones of boggy, low permeability coal. Outburst risk, with remote mining capability being
developed for low permeability zones.
6 X 2400mm roof bolts/metre with full mesh.2 X 1800mm steel rib bolts/metre/rib installed through 1.2m
long 2m high rib mesh.
6m or 8m mega bolts installed where required by TARP. Major mega bolting project underway in roadways adjacent
to longwall in adjoining mine.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M010MINE RESPONSES
Extensive mega boltng typically installed in gate roads prior to longwall retreat in adjoining mine, with 1 - 6 months
lag between installation and subsequent extraction.
3 - good.
1 - difficult.Note 1800mm rib bolts, 2/metre/rib.
2 - poor.
0.36kms
50m/week/CM (1/7/05 - 27/8/05).Operators currently under training.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M010MINE RESPONSES
11.27kms
3.42M tonne
136m/week/CM
136m/week/CM
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M010MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M010MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M010MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M010MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M010MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M010MINE RESPONSES
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0112.7m2.7m
2.7m
5.2m5.2m
30 X 100m, with variations for gateroad alignment.
2 heading tailgate, 30 X 100m.3 heading maingate, 35 X 100m and 25 X100m for primary and secondary pillars (secondary pillar increases to 100 X
32m as depth increases)1
2
8ERZ controller, 5 miners, I mechanical and 1 electrical
tradesperson.
8ERZ controller, 5 miners, I mechanical and 1 electrical
tradesperson.
12CM32
12CM32
2 Aro Series 4000 roof bolting rigs, 2 Aro rib bolting rigs.
2 Aro Series 4000 roof bolting rigs, 2 Aro rib bolting rigs.
DBT FRR15 diesel hauler - typically 2 but can be increased to 3 in extended wheeling situations.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M011MINE RESPONSES
1 X DBT FRR15 diesel hauler per panel.
2 X modular pods - 100m advance/2 pods.
2 X modular pods - 100m advance/2 pods.
Nominal 7 day, 2 X 12 hour production shifts.
Varies 8 - 12 hours depending upon roster cycle.
Production crews 7 on:7 offMon - Fri maintenance and services crew 5 X 8 hour shifts
250 - 375mRelatively flat.
CH4, 7 - 15m3/t.Reduced to maximum 5.75m3/t by gas drainage in
accordance with frictional ignition management plan.TRD, MRD (1,200m) and in seam drilling/drainage.
No problems noted.
No problems noted.
Tight labour market.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M011MINE RESPONSES
New mine development, completing initial maingate and tailgate roadways.
Shaft mine with shaft access for M&M.3 heading gateroads.
1.8m long resin encapsulated bolts, 6 bolts/1.4m installed in a 4/2 pattern.
4.5m mesh modules with additional spot bolt on overlap1.2m fully encapsulated steel rib bolts , 1 bolt/1.4m/rib,
spot bolted.
1.8m long resin encapsulated bolts, 6 bolts/1.4m installed in a 4/2 pattern.
4.5m mesh modules with additional spot bolt on overlap.1.2m fully encapsulated rib bolts , 1 bolt/1.4m/rib. Spot
bolted with plastic dowels on longwall block side.
2 X 4.1m JSS tendons on 2m centres when geological structures intersected, in accordance with mine TARPs,
and installed during development.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M011MINE RESPONSES
2 X 4.1m JSS tendons on 2m centres when geological structures intersected, in accordance with mine TARPs,
and installed during development.
4 - very ggod.Immediate roof strata 45 - 50 MPa with overlying 100Mpa.
4 - very good.
4 - very good.Immediate floor strata 45Mpa with +50Mpa below.
Diesel haulers can break floor up when extended haulage distances adopted.
2004 (6 months) 6.5kms.2005 (7 months) 11.5kms.
150m/week
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M011MINE RESPONSES
180m/week (2 entry tailgate)200m/week (3 entry maingate)
25kms - 3 units - 3 heading gateroads.
5Mtpa (including development)
3 - good.
3 - good.Need a system to replace or reduce numbers of roof bolts
installed - yielding pillars?
3 - good.Development sequence designed to eliminate wheeling
under ventilation duct, allowing haulers to be fully loaded.16 tonne hauler payload allows cut out for 4 bolt pass with second hauler then allowing 2 bolt pass to be completed.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M011MINE RESPONSES
3 - good.Shaft winding system introduces constraints on access and
delivery of supplies.
2 - low.Typically 30 hours in 2 entry tailgate (services and
conveyor in one roadway).Typically 25 hours in 3 entry maingate where services and
conveyor in separate roadways.
3 - good.Still commissioning and debugging OEM equipment.4 hour maintenance window M,T, T , F, with 12 hour
window on Wednesdays primarily used for shaft maintenance
3 - good.Constrained due to limited shaft winding capacity during
initial development phase.(noted that shaft winder only operating at 75% of designed
420tph capacity).
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M011MINE RESPONSES
Full implementation of mine's existing development capacity and systems.
Roof support.Coal haulage.
Services - ventilation, power, water, compressed air
1 - Ventilation2 - Roof support.
3 - Coal clearance.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M011MINE RESPONSES
Advancing longwall.
Self powered CM (cableless).Roadways and pillars designed to eliminate/minimise
support requirements (very wide roadways/narrow pillars).Automated bolting, self drilling bolts, automated carousels.
Need to address integrity of ribs.Ventilation??
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M011MINE RESPONSES
Advancing longwalls.
Battery/power technologies.Site specific geomechanics (managing risks of
pillar/roadway failure).Self drilling bolts.
Flexible exhausting ventilation fabrics, or forcing ventilation and dust control.
People - individual personalities and group dynamics, how to systemise work processes, boring repetitive processes,
developing and maintaining enthusiasm, lack of experience from coal face to mine management.
Roof support.Coal haulage.
Pillar and roadway design.
Trial of Kemcoal Beaver, and introduction of ABM20s, battery haulers, diesel haulers, MBE, place changing.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M011MINE RESPONSES
Kemcoal Beaver Mk I - hybrid prototype, not robust enough, good idea at time, however lacked the cutting
capacity of the then existing mining systems.ABM20 - suited mine at time and went well.
MBE - cumbersome, poor design, not as flexible as current system.
Battery haulers - good carrying capacity, hard on floor conditions, difficult to make change from SCs.
Diesel haulers - flexible, good carrying capacity, may introduce heat effects during summer periods once mine
deepens.Place changing - didn't suit mine design, pillar dimensions
not suited, some people didn't want to make it work, difficult to make change from in place mining, directive
change not involvement.Didn't like FCT and KB conveyor, too big and cumbersome.
Need to introduce new technologies early in mine life cycle before attitudes and culture hardens.
Pick right people to manage and be part of change process.
Costs and risks associated with introduction of new technology.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M011MINE RESPONSES
Be aware of RSI conditions and effects related to operation of equipment with high advance rates.
Good initiative to have mine workshops and interviews. Industry workshop/s may provide opportunity for
brainstorming of ideas and improving collective wisdom.
Yes.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0122.4m to 3.6m
3m
>2.7m
5m5m
Nominal 100m X 35m - varies due to gateroad arrangements.
2 heading99m X 40m
1 - not continuously operated, currently 2 year contract to complete mains development in current area.
21 normal CM unit
1 modified twin unit (two CMs with only 1 manned at a time).
81 ERZ controller, 1 supervising operator technician, 6 operator technicians including one mechanical and 1
electrical trades specialist.
91 ERZ controller, 1 supervising operator technician, 7 operator technicians including one mechanical and 1
electrical trades specialist.
VA Eimco ABM20 Series 1 and Series 2
VA Eimco ABM20 Series 1 and Series 2
4 hydraulic bolters on each CM, 2 hydraulic rib borers.2.1m roof bolts, 1.2m rib bolts - single pass drilling.
4 hydraulic bolters on each CM, 2 hydraulic rib borers.2.1m roof bolts, 1.2m rib bolts - single pass drilling.
Single SC each unit, feed onto 1800mm 5000 tph Mains conveyor.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M012MINE RESPONSES
Single SC each unit, feed onto 1500mm 3500 tph gateroad conveyor.
CM mounted supply pods, loaded on surface, handled with QDS attachments.
30m development per pod.Roof mesh handled manually.
CM mounted supply pods, loaded on surface, handled with QDS attachments.
30m development per pod.Roof mesh handled manually.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M012MINE RESPONSES
2.1m long resin encapsulated bolts, 8 bolts/m (4/4 pattern), support density 1.6 bolts/m2.
4.8m X 1.2m welded mesh roof modules. 1.2m long resin encapsulated rib bolts, 3 bolts/m/rib, cuttable dowels used where extra roadways may be
developed off Mains roadways.
2.1m long resin encapsulated bolts, 8 bolts/m (4/4 pattern) in first 8 pillars of panel, all weak areas, and ALL cut
throughs.6 bolts/metre (4/2 pattern) in rest of gateroads
4.8m X 1.2m welded mesh roof modules. 1.2m long resin encapsulated steel rib bolts installed on
chain pillar side, 4 bolts/m.1.2m long cuttable dowels installed on block side, 5
dowels/m.Installation of rib mesh during development to be trialed.
6.1m long fully encapsulated HiTENS tendons typically installed 2.5m linear spacing all roadways, reduced to
2.0m spacing in poor conditions and intersections.8.1m long fully encapsulated HiTENS tendons installed in
wide intersections.Pre-tensioned post-groutable Bowen cables (patent
pending) installed in broken roof conditions (eg; faulted areas).
Secondary supports in parallel with mining cycle post relocation to next pillar.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M012MINE RESPONSES
6.1m long fully encapsulated HiTENS tendons typically installed 2.5m linear spacing all roadways, reduced to 2.0m spacing in poor conditions and intersections, with
additional 4 HiTENS across mouth of cut through.Additional row of HiTENS installed on block side of
conveyor roadway.Pre-tensioned post-groutable Bowen cables (patent
pending) installed in broken roof conditions (eg; faulted areas) and on block side of conveyor roadway.
In conveyor roadway secondary supports installed in parallel with mining cycle while travelling road being mined
(9 - 14 days after mining).In travel road secondary supports typically installed no
closer than section transformer position.Plastic tensar mesh installed with split sets on ALL walk side of conveyor roadways and sections of of block side
where rib spall extensive.(Trial to install rib mesh during primary support cycle in
progress).3 - good.
1+ - difficult.
3 - - good.Providing good face management practices maintained.
Floor conditions tend to adversely impact tailgate conditions and maingate roadway inbye face during
longwall extraction.
17.7 km (1996) - 5 development units
4.2Mt ROM (1996) - 2 longwalls
73m/week (1996)
185m/week (1996)
14.7km (2004)
4.1Mt ROM (2004)
Not consistently worked.In 2003 Mains was 48m/week including lot of stonework
(driveheads, overcasts).
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M012MINE RESPONSES
193m/week modified twin unit.124m/week single CM unit.
2+ > 3-, low to good.One CM modified to high load out capacity, others yet to
be modified.ABM20 capable of 6 - 8m/hour, target 4 - 5m/hour due to
support density, achieve 3 - 4m/hour.
2 - low.Roof and rib bolting in series, lot of areas for improvement
to parallel bolting task and remove roof/rib support from critical path.
3 - good.Only time constrained by coal haulage is in cut throughs, at
times. However if roof/rib bolting removed from critical path one
SC would be insufficient to cope with coal clearance.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M012MINE RESPONSES
4 - verty good.Manual handling of mesh modules a problem.
1 - very low.Typically 48 hours to complete 99m panel extension (from
stop cutting to start cutting). Lot of opportunity for improvement.
2+ - low.Appeared to be a number of unresolved repetitive delays.
4 - very good.
Insufficient data available from previous owners to verify whether real improvements have been made. Conditions in early panels very favourable although conditions in current
mining area deteriorated significantly.Have developed internal capability for panel extensions and improved panel standards and face management to
maintain earlier productivity levels.Achieving consistency of performance and standards.
Getting the most out of personnel.High labour turnover reported as an issue, only manning 7
of 8 development crews.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M012MINE RESPONSES
Better understanding of process and better utilisation of data.
New technology such as drillable bolts.Improved roof and rib bolting equipment and systems
(although other bottlenecks will then need to be addressed eg; coal haulage).
Reducing duration of panel extensions.
Roof and rib bolting.Panel extensions.
Installation of secondary supports in parallel with mining operations.
(Noted that height restrictions and requirement to install block side tendons in conveyor roadway prior to panel
extension was major constraint in development process, with drivage of cut through from travelling road to conveyor
roadway sub-optimal).
1 - Panel extensions.2 - Secondary support.
3 - Face bolting.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M012MINE RESPONSES
TBM (Mojura) system incorporating temporary positive roof and rib support restraint and automated roof and rib bolting
together with integrated FCT and services extensions (fewer people working at face and working within a steel
envelope).Extendable services (reported developments at Newstan).
Continuously extending panel conveyor.ACBM good concept - no champion.
Tube conveyor?
Improved management and utilisation of data to complete business evaluations.
Longwalls are development constrained, therefore no capacity to trial new hardware and systems in non-critical
panel.Only underground mine within a larger corporate entity,
difficult to build critical mass.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M012MINE RESPONSES
Systems incorporating better use of data. Noted that open cuts successfully utilise data loggers to improve
performance.Machine guidance (with aim of removing personnel from
immediate face area).Use of plastic "husker" mesh for roof and rib support to enhance automation of roof and rib bolting and remove requirement for close alignment of drill steels and bolts
with mesh.Better control of dust produced from cutting and drilling to
enable activities to be carried out outbye in return.Potential application of shotcreteing as roof and rib support
measure as per metalliferous mines (noted that requirement to have personnel bolting at face introduced number of hazards and constraints on mining process).
Multi-phase bolting (noted that installed support was designed for longwall requirements, not to meet actual
development support requirements). Removing stop/start from development process, ie;
improve bolting equipment and systems to drive other improvements (ie; currently roof/rib bolting constrained).
1 - Automation - getting people away from the face area - a vision of 1 person operating CM (eg; metalliferous jumbo
operators).2 - Eliminate SC and associated roadway clean up and
maintenance - reliable FCT.3 - making system continuous, ie; extendable conveyors,
support installation in parallel with cutting, ventilation extensions - need to understand the process better.
Improving uptime and cutting.Setting and maintaining standards.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M012MINE RESPONSES
Maintained development rates in deteriorating conditions and with increased secondary support requirements.
Need to understand the development process and the business better in order identify and make improvements.
3 - - very interested in industry based incremental change initiatives.
Particularly in relation to improved bolting and coal clearance systems.
Encourage major mining companies to develop new generation mining systems, and then take up proven
systems if justified.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M012MINE RESPONSES
Self drilling bolts.Services extensions.Roof and rib bolting.
Yes
Need to ensure focus maintained on improving safety (noted that automation of bolting and elimination of manual
intervention will significantly improve safety). Development of an industry based roadway development
expert system that would enable mines to monitor and fine tune development process.
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0133.2 - 7.5m
3.3m
3.4m
5.2m5.2m
33m roadway centres, cut throughs at various centres to suit longwall, minimum 33m centres.
46m X 105m
1
2Operates as a dual miner unit.
9Deputy plus 8 mineworkers including trades.
16 dual unit - 10 single unit.Dual unit - 2 deputies plus 14 mineworkers (including
trades).Single unit - 1 deputy plus 9 mineworkers (including
trades).ABM25
2 X ABM25
4 Hydramatic Series 4000 roof bolting rigs and 2 Hydramatic Series 4000 rib bolting rigs per machine.
Rigs feature auto feed plus single pass capability.
4 Hydramatic Series 4000 roof bolting rigs and 2 Hydramatic Series 4000 rib bolting rigs per machine.
Rigs feature auto feed plus single pass capability.
1 shuttle car discharging into a feeder breaker.1600mm trunk conveyor, with some temporary 1200mm
trunk conveyors.1,500 tonne underground bin feeds coal into two separate
customer streams.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M013MINE RESPONSES
1shuttle car per continuous miner discharging into a common feeder breaker.
1400mm panel conveyors, with some temporary 1200mm panel conveyors.
Trailer mounted pod system.300 bolts or 50m advance per set of pods.
Duckbills used for mesh and other materials.
Trailer mounted pod system.300 bolts or 50m advance per set of pods.
Duckbills used for mesh and other materials.
7
8 hours D/S Mon - Fri.9.5 hours N/A and A/S Mon - Thurs.
12 hour shifts Fri - Sun.Fixed roster, D/S 5 days/week, N/S and D/S 4 days/week
Weekends three 12 hour shifts..
160 - 350mSeam grade variable 1:30 - 1:8.
800m wide steeply dipping section crosses mining area at 30 degrees.
Up to 700mm cross grade experienced in roadways in gateroads.
Up to 6m3/tonne with extremely variable permeability (2 - 2,000 millidarcies)
1 X 22m3/s auxiliary fan in Mains development and 2 X 22m3/s auxiliary fans in dual miner gateroad development.
Major and minor horizontal stress measured at 10MPa and 4MPa respectively.
Labour relatively stable with 50:50 combination of permanent employees and employees of contractors.
Age of permanent workforce averages 50 years.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M013MINE RESPONSES
15 years with potential for further 15 years in adjacent exploration licence area.
Mine designed to minimise surface subsidence by utilising a massive overlying conglomerate beam to span between
gateroad, resulting in narrow 115 - 150m wide longwall blocks. Development:longwall ratio of 3:1 metres.
Mine culture exhibits features typical of mines that were formerly publicly owned.
4 or 6 X 2100mm AX roof bolts per metre, depending upon depth of workings. Mesh used in all roadways.
1 X1200mm steel or fibreglass dowels per metre/rib, with rib mesh used if conditions warrant.
2 X 4m tendons per 2 metres installed as additional primary support in poor or broken roof conditions (typically
30% of Mains roadways).
4 or 6 X 2100mm AX roof bolts per metre, depending upon depth of workings. Mesh used in all roadways.
1 X1200mm steel or fibreglass dowels per metre/rib, with rib mesh used if conditions warrant.
2 X 4m tendons per 2 metres installed as additional primary support in poor or broken roof conditions (typically
5% of gateroads).
2 X 4m tendons per 2 metres installed as additional primary support in poor or broken roof conditions (typically
30% of roadways).
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M013MINE RESPONSES
2 X 6m tendons per 2 metres installed in maingate and tailgate roadways in deeper area of workings (approx
50%), 2 - 6 months after development.
3 - good.
2 - poor to good.Poor rib conditions occur in conjunction with variable joint set and are more frequent from midway along gateroads and further inbye as the seam rolls and depth of cover
increases.
3 - good.Some areas extremely good, some areas extremely soft.
10km3 CM units available however averaged 2.5 CMs in
operation throughout the year
1.1Mt
80m/week/CM
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M013MINE RESPONSES
110m/week/CM
15km
3.4Mt
100m/week/CM
150m/week/CM
2 - low.OEM rates equipment at 6 - 7MPOH, typically achieve
1.5MPOH.Flitting continuous miners is an issue due to poor
tramability, while they also have problems loading coal out.
3 - good.Not roof bolt constrained when installing 4 bolts/metre, rib
bolting is more of a constraint however, particularly in areas affected by variable joint set.
2 - low.Old shuttle cars, putting a specification together for new
SCs.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M013MINE RESPONSES
3 - good.Vary rare that production stopped due to lack of supplies,
however have had trouble sourcing expansion shell anchored rib bolts at times (delivery ex USA).
2 - low.Average 27 hours to complete panel advance.
Panel advance initiated by metreage milestone, however length of shuttle car cables and requirement to form 50m
overdrive for monorail mounted services (eg; power, water, return water, compressed air and 25m flexible ducting) are
operational issues.
3 - good.One shift maintenance/CM/week on a routine cycle, plus 0.5 shifts per week during outbye conveyor maintenance
windows. Roof and rib bolters reported as high maintenance items,
although Kevlar wrapped rib bolt hoses have proved beneficial.
Reported that CMs are a high maintenance machine and require high labour levels to effect.
Issue raised in respect to supply of continuous miner with non integrated bolting equipment.
3 - good.Planned maintenance windows on outbye conveyors 4 - 8
hours per week.Longwall can currently produce at higher levels than
outbye capacity, although this will be addressed when second customer feed system completed.
Longwall mining commenced early 2005.Narrow longwalls, hence high development:extraction
ratios.Additional units and shifts worked, new mining equipment.
Introduction of ABM25 continuous miner.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M013MINE RESPONSES
Introduction of ABM25 continuous miner.
Focus on process mapping.Noted that projected 20kms of development required in
2005/06.
Focus on process mapping.Increased utilisation of equipment with adoption of cycle
based maintenance system.Utilisation of data logging on CMs to monitor and manage
performance.
Changed sequence to minimise exclusion zones in gateroad development.
Bigger shuttle cars, allowing 2 SC per metre advance.Introduction of a 150mm pipe installation trailer to reduce
panel advance duration.Possibly relocate breaker feeder to panel/mains transfer
point to take out of panel advance process.Adoption of steel rib mesh to control rib break and
minimise damage to rib bolter hoses.Still a lot of potential to go from 1.5 to 4 - 6MPOH.Installing/extending ventilation ducting in 3.4m high
roadway - need Eimco to put ducting up.Supplies and logistics.
Panel advances.Rib bolt constrained - should design machine around rib
bolters, not retro-fit.Supply of longwall conveyor belting and structure.
1 - Rib bolting.2 - Installation of ventilation ducting.
3 - Panel advance.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M013MINE RESPONSES
TBM with integrated continuous haulage and monorail mounted services and supply system, with all supplies incorporated into 3m modules (eg; support materials,
conveyor materials, etc).Newstan style monorail services management system.
Extensible panel conveyor, with mobile boot end.Eliminating time losses in the development process (eg; cutting out niches for DCBs, feeders, fans, breakaways).
Getting a champion to drive improvement projects to fruition - won't be a site a site based person, too busy.
Funding.Ventilation of single entry TBM roadways.
Connecting TBM roadways.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M013MINE RESPONSES
Self drilling bolts, and automated bolting.Extensible conveyor system and mobile boot end designed
to allow access beside conveyor.3.3Kv continuous miners.
Bigger capacity transformers to minimise transformer moves.
Bolting systems.Continuous haulage systems.
Integration of services (fan, power, ventilation, water) and supply systems.
Monorail services management systems including crawler mounted auxiliary fans.Development tail end.14BU pick up loader.
Process improvement.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M013MINE RESPONSES
All were successful developments.
Need for site and corporate support of project champions, particularly in relation to the provision of appropriate
resources.Potential ventilation issues associated with use of pick up
loaders, particularly in gassy seams.Benefit of including tool storage facilities on monorail
systems.
4 - very interested in industry based step change initiatives.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M013MINE RESPONSES
Continuous haulage or anything that facilitates a continuous process.
Rib bolters and rib bolting.Self drilling bolts.
Yes.
Need to have committed developers prepared to fit into site and make things work.
Need to have concepts more fully developed prior to trials at mine sites.
Persistence and perseverance for 3 - 5 year projects?How to build critical mass behind successful projects and
transfer it to other sites?
Yes.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0143.2 - 3.6m
3.6m
3.2 - 3.6m
5.0m5.0m
40m X 60m, and 40m X 40m
40m X 90m
1
1
71 deputy, 6 operators.
91 deputy, 7 operators, 1 mechanical trades.
Eimco (DBT) Dash 3Cut and Flit
Eimco (DBT) Dash 3Cut and Flit
Fletcher Mobile Bolter
Fletcher Mobile Bolter
Joy 15SC, Stamler breaker feeder, 1200mm conveyor.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M014MINE RESPONSES
Joy 15SC, Klockner Becorit breaker feeder, 1050mm conveyor.
Eimco EJC 130 and bulk materials pods.Roof bolts, rib bolts, roof and rib mesh in individual pods,
manually loaded onto mobile bolter in panel.
Eimco EJC 130 and bulk materials pods.Roof bolts, rib bolts, roof and rib mesh in individual pods,
manually loaded onto mobile bolter in panel.
7 days per week
9 hour weekday shifts.12 hour weekend shifts
Weekday roster 5 days per week (9 day fortnight).Weekend roster 3 X12 hour shifts and 2 X12 hour plus 1
X9.5 hour shifts on alternate weekends.
420 - 500m1:40
In situ gas levels 12- 16m3/tonne. Residual gas levels after drainage <6m3/tonne.
Varies widely from predominantly CH4 to predominantly CO2
Mine ventilation capacity 230m3/sec.Ventilation of extensive old workings utilises significant
portion of mine capacity.High horizontal stress levels, typically 15Mpa.
No problems noted, and currently in process of recruiting 11 additional employees.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M014MINE RESPONSES
20+ years.
Utilisation of place change (cut and flit) for all roadway development, including 2 entry gateroads.
In situ gas levels and gas composition.Extent of mine ventilation system and outbye roadways
requiring maintenance (+100 year old mine).Distance travelled to working districts.
Shaft access for manriding, 10 men/wind.Combined drift, rail and RTV material supply system.
Size limitations on equipment being transported underground.
Extensive, tortuous trunk conveyor system.
6 X 2100mm roof bolts/1.1 metre with mesh modules.2 X 1500mm steel rib bolts/1.1 metre/rib installed through
narrow rib mesh straps.
6 X 2100mm roof bolts/1.1 metre with mesh modules.2 X 150mm steel rib bolts/1.1 metre/rib installed through
narrow rib mesh straps. Noted that trials of plastic rib dowels underway.
Fully grouted 6m and 8m mega bolts installed as required, based upon monitoring. Noted that limited secondary
support in Mains other than double breakaway intersections and longwall takeoff access roadways.
Tin Cans installed in some areas.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M014MINE RESPONSES
Fully grouted 6m and 8m mega bolts installed as required, based upon hazard mapping. Typically 2 X 6m tendons/2
metres throughout tailgate roadways with to 2 X 6m tendons/1.5 metres in maingate intersections and identified
hazard areas.Mega bolts typically installed minimum 2 pillars in advance
of retreating longwall in both gateroads.Tin Cans installed in some areas.
4 - - very good.Noted that roof allows adoption of place change mining in
both Mains and Panel development.
2 - poor.One side of roadway typically good, other side typically poor - factor of angle of intersection of high angle cleat.
Propensity to slough off rib in high angle wedges on affected side.
2 - poor.Floor conditions rapidly deteriorate at intersections -
considered be a factor of repeated flitting of CM through intersections with place change mining.
Longwall mining commenced in 1995.
8.87kms
1.50M tonne
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M014MINE RESPONSES
Anticipate approximately 10kms/annum.Mine plan based on continued adoption of 158m wide
(centre to centre) longwall blocks. Considered that narrow longwalls minimise subsidence issues in environmentally sensitive areas, whilst narrow blocks also minimise risk of floor breaks during longwall extraction and the need for cross measures drainage of
floor strata.
3 - good.Continuous miner not considered to be a development
constraint.
2 - low.Bolting is considered to be the development constraint and
the mobile bolters require a high level of maintenance activity in terms of time and cost.
3 - good.Only operate with 1 shuttle car behind place changing CM due to congestion in panel, and the fact that mining is bolt
constrained even with one shuttle car in operation.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M014MINE RESPONSES
2 - low.Manual handling of support materials from bulk pods to
mobile bolters is extremely labour intensive. Retrofitting of supply pods onto mobile bolters would deliver considerable
benefits.
2 - low.Typically 20 -30 hours, with duration of panel advance
greatly affected by extent of preparatory work completed. Noted that a major disadvantage of the 2 entry place change mining system is that there are no standing
roadways where preparatory works can be completed prior to panel advance.
Noted that installation of "bat bags" in current panel advance process extends overall duration by half a shift.
4 - very good.Maintenance has improved dramatically with adoption of
routine 1 shift per week maintenance.
3 - good.Suggested that few mines can consistently operate 22 - 23
hours per day, as is routinely achieved at the mine.Provision of surge capacity mid way through the coal
clearance system improves overall availability and utilisation, with development given priority in event of high
surge bin levels.Additional unit shifts and additional days worked.
Change of mining system to place change mining.Development given priority to longwall operations.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M014MINE RESPONSES
Potential introduction of an additional development unit to facilitate development of new mining area.
Continuing improvements to development process - anticipate that current performance level of 16m/shift could
be increased to 24m/shift.
Roadway support.Gas drainage.Panel services.
Coal clearance capacity (1500tph in Mains to surge bin, 650tph outbye).
1 - Roadway support.2 - Panel services including gas drainage.
3 - Coal clearance capacity.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M014MINE RESPONSES
Continuously extensible panel conveyor and panel services.
Automation of CM and bolter operation with machine guidance/seam following capabilities.
All services monorail mounted. An effective means of mining cut throughs.
Development costs.Lack of operator and OEM commitment to pursue
developments to successful conclusion.History of past failures, lack of commitment, failure to
follow through, and a lack of perseverance in respect to development of new roadway development technology.
Availability of mine real estate for the trial and development of equipment and systems away
from critical path operations, and the business risks associated with such trials and development if no suitable
real estate is available.Time required to prove up reliability of equipment, and
develop a comprehensive integrated system - noted that the introduction of ABM20 was affected by the failure to
provide a complete, proven development system.Time required to develop new technologies.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M014MINE RESPONSES
Self drilling bolting systems.Automated bolting systems.
Better transfer of hard rock mining technology to underground coal sector generally.
Bolting technology, or some other means of supporting roof and ribs.
Panel advance technology.Continuously extensible panel conveyor system.
Horizon control/terrain following and machine guidance systems.
Better exploration technology to enable production affecting structures to be detected prior to mining (and mitigation strategies to be implemented in a timely and
effective manner).Self drilling bolt (P Gray).
Paurat and KB Continuous haulage.12CM20.ABM20.
Place change mining.Vent tube monorail handling system.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M014MINE RESPONSES
Self drilling bolt - great potential.Paurat miner - dog, broke through floor, too heavy, couldn't
clean up.KB Continuous haulage - poor reliability, excessive fines
and spillage, problem steering through cut throughs.12CM20 - machine nose heavy, hydraulic rigs
troublesome, unreliable, E/W conveyor system problematic and inefficient.
Place change mining - successful, safer, removed people from immediate face area, allowed elements of process to
be completed simultaneously, requires good roof conditions, system still being used successfully.
ABM20 - cutting capacity reduced to capacity of bolting system, limited on board storage capacity required
frequent replenishment, complicated machine requiring more regular maintenance and higher skill levels, lack of
OEM support coupled with OEM skill shortageVent tube monorail - lot of potential, lack of commitment to
follow through.
Progress of self drilling bolt impacted by politics and issues between various parties involved in project.
1 - remain aggressive followers.Limited manning and technical support on site to make a
major commitment to operational R&D.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M014MINE RESPONSES
Self drilling bolts and bolting automation.
Put a package together of existing best practice technology and trial.
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0155.46m3.2m
3.2m
5.5m5.2m
40m X 50m (original Mains)
90m cut through centres.
1 Contract bord and pillar - to commence Mains
development October 2005.
2.
8ERZ controller, 5 miners, I mechanical and 1 electrical
tradesperson.
6 - 7 per panel.
Jeffery 1036
ABM25
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M015MINE RESPONSES
Transportable pod system.
Transportable pod system.
7 days per week
12 hours.
4 on:5 off:5 on:4 off:5 on:5 off - rotating.
280mRelatively flat.
In situ gas levels 7m3/tonne. Residual gas levels after drainage <4m3/tonne.
Mine ventilation capacity at limits.High humidity levels experienced during summer months,
and refrigeration utilised to cool intake air.No problems experienced to date.
High turnover of labour.Struggling to recruit experienced deputies, trades, and
miner drivers.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M015MINE RESPONSES
Mine currently in first half of life cycle.
Annualised salary with no overtime or incentive bonus scheme.
6 x 1.8m X grade roof bolt per metre with mesh in travel and belt roads, butterfly plates only in other roads. Ribs
consists of 2 x 1.2m S grade bolts per metre with mesh in belt and travel roads and butterfly plates only in other
roads.
4 x 1.8m X grade roof bolt per metre increasing to 6 per metre in intersections. Future tailgate roadways are fully
roof meshed with the belt roads using only butterfly plates. Typically 2 x S grade (pillar side) and 2 x cuttable
(blockside) 1.2m rib bolts are used per metre. Often rib conditions dictate that 3 bolts per metre are used or
occasionally full rib meshing.
Only in response to TARP triggers ie faults movement but not normally conducted.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M015MINE RESPONSES
Typically 2 x 8m post grouted tendons are installed every 2m in future TG roadways. This is place prior to longwall
side abutment loading. Additional link n lock standing support will be installed prior to tailgate retreat at approx 1 per 3m. Rib will be fully meshed and supported with 1.8 to
2.1m bolts.
Belt roads are additionally supported with 6m point anchored tendons 2 per 2.5m prior to retreat.
2 - 3, poor to good.
1 - 2, difficult to poor.
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
10.62kms plus 14.18kms of bord and pillar development.
4.95Mt.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M015MINE RESPONSES
Budget 200m/week/CM.Actual 93m/week/CM.
Previous gateroads 140m/week/CM.
20.6kms plus 21.8kms from bord and pillar development.
6.22Mt.
150m/week.
145m/week.Noted that mine will be in a entirely different domain in
2014/15 at significantly greater depth and higher in situ gas levels.
3 - good.Principle of continuous miner is good, however suffers from a crowded operational area and poor ergonomics.
Target rate is 3MPOH.
3 - good.Hydramatic drill rigs experiences lubrication problems and
a lot of downtime with blown hoses.
3 - good.Recent conversion to Joy 16SC with capacity of 20 tonnes,
allows 2 SC loads per metre advance.Big improvement in floor conditions noted with shuttle cars
(in lieu of diesel haulers).
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M015MINE RESPONSES
2- - low.Pod capacity reduced from 100m to 50m with introduction
of new CMs.Lot of work to be done to improve supply system and use
of trailers.Nee to have underground storage area for heavy lift, high
capacity trailers.1 - very low.
Target 24 hours, generally in excess of 30 hours.1800mm roof mounted longwall structure installed with development crew (previously utilised contractors to
complete panel advances of a weekend).
2 - low.Scheduled for 1 maintenance shift/week during a mine
wide 12 hour maintenance window.Problems experienced with CM and SC maintenance if
panel advice done in conjunction with mine wide maintenance window.
2 hour window available each day for maintenance and servicing, however no maintenance labour available at that
time.
2 - low.Capacity good however reliability reported to be terrible
with 30 hours lost per week due to conveyor delays.
Development rates decreased due to higher gas levels and ventilation constraints being experienced, together with more intensive support requirements. Also noted that
problems being experienced installing bottom rib bolts due to friable nature of ribs.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M015MINE RESPONSES
Will need to completely mesh ribs on development which will further impact development rates.
Also expected that in situ gas levels will increase as mine gets deeper, requiring more intensive gas drainage.
Additional units likely to be required to maintain develop-ment and develop access to new mine area.
Services.Supplies.
Coal clearance to boot end.Roof and rib bolting.
1 - Roof and rib bolting (particularly longwall preparation).2 - Services.3 - Supplies.
4 - Gas drainage.5 - Coal clearance
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M015MINE RESPONSES
Go back and simplify existing hardware - too many delays with high technology, technicians cannot keep up with
technology - move back to manual control.Attached coal clearance system.
Monorail services management system.Mobile boot end.
Ventilation fan mounted on feeder, with hydraulic cable reeling.
Extensible coal clearance system with mobile boot end.Self drilling bolt with carousel bolter.
Machine guidance systems.Don't think there is too much wrong with existing
continuous miner platform.Better geological detection and exploration at face.
High tendency to overcomplicate things.Too many inherent safety systems.
Skill shortages among all levels of organisation.Failure to address major delay cause.
Lack , and A lack of OEM expertise to maintain and troubleshoot their
own equipment, and a lack of OEM support generally.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M015MINE RESPONSES
Metalliferous and open cut technology generally - seen to be more advanced and reliable.
Utilisation of marine diesels in coal mines - temperature controlled, water cooled.
Machine and personnel tracking systems together with an integrated control system.
Alternatively powered equipment to obviate the need for trailing and reticulation cables.Light weight pipe and fittings.
Conveyor extensions - making belt moves more friendly.Downsizing cables and flameproof components.
Self drilling bolts.Dust capture.
Skill development.
Joy Sumps Shearer.Monorail and mobile boot ends.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M015MINE RESPONSES
Joy Sumps Shearer - good concept, too many electric motors.
Monorail - failure, due to level of manning required to support high rate of development.Mobile boot ends - still in infancy.
Need to involve people in the development and introduction of new technology and equipment.
Need to better manage the change process and overcome the NIH (not invented here) syndrome and pig peoples
headedness.Understanding site characteristics and conditions, and
what will work in those conditions.Legislative requirements impacting the ability to efficiently and quickly modify and adapt equipment and technology.
3 - very interested in industry based incremental change initiatives.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M015MINE RESPONSES
Training.The utilisation and management of labour.Hanging systems for ventilation ducting.
Quietening of on-board dust scrubbers to allow forcing ventilation systems to be employed
Capture the learnings of the grey heads (who are leaving the industry) to enable the new generation of miners to be more effectively trained (and minimise reinvention of the
wheel).The industry is not putting enough consolidated effort into addressing the industry skills shortage and rebuilding the
industry skills base.Need to address the workforce's typical lack of ownership
and pride in their work, a lack of incentive to do better (noted that the mine is one of a few to not to utilise an
incentive scheme).Need to pay tradesmen in accordance with their skills -
inadequate margin above operators.Ned top improve the transfer of ideas and technology
within companies as well as across the industry.
Yes.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M015B5.5m3.4m
3.2m
5.5m6.5m
40m X 40m (varies)
23m x 21m
1
1
8ERZ controller, 5 miners, I mechanical and 1 electrical
tradesperson.
11ERZ controller, 8 miners, I mechanical and 1 electrical
tradesperson.
ABM20.
Noted that ABM20 is to be replaced with ABM25.Jeffery 1036.
Noted that 1036 CM is to be replaced with ABM25.
On board rigs ABM20
Joy (Cram) Multibolter
Jeffery Ramcars1050mm Conveyor.
Noted that diesel haulers are being replaced with 21 - 22m3 capacity shuttle cars.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M015BMINE RESPONSES
3 Jeffery Ramcars.1050mm Conveyor.
Noted that diesel haulers are being replaced with 21 - 22m3 capacity shuttle cars.
1 X ED7 Cassette on ABM20.
1 X ESC130 Cassette on Joy Multibolter.
7 day
12 hour, 1 hour overlap day/night shifts
4 on:5 off:5 on:4 off:5 on:5 off - rotating
280mRelatively flat.
In situ gas levels 7m3/tonne. Residual gas levels after drainage <4m3/tonne.
Mine ventilation capacity at limits.High humidity levels experienced during summer months,
and refrigeration utilised to cool intake air.No problems experienced to date.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M015BMINE RESPONSES
Medium term contract for bord and pillar and Mains development.
Contract bord and pillar (place changing) development.Major mining equipment supplied by Principal.
Contractor's focus is on systems, development sequence, standards, people and supervision.
1.8m high tensile roof bolt, 6 bolt per metre. Mesh modules in conveyor and travel roadways, butterfly plates all other
roadways.1.2m rib bolt.
4m or 6m super strands in high/wide/faulted/TARP specified areas.
1.8m high tensile roof bolt, 4 bolt per metre headings and cut throughs, 6 bolts per metre intersections. Butterfly
plates and 100mm washers all roadways.1.2m rib bolt.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M015BMINE RESPONSES
4 - very good.
4 - very good.
3 - good.
Mains development to commence September 2005.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M015BMINE RESPONSES
Budget 420m/week.Typically achieving 400m/week, although development
affected by poor roof conditions over past 2 months and limited development to 250 - 300m/week.
4 - very good.Utilisation of 3 diesel haulers with multiple haulage routes
around small pillars.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M015BMINE RESPONSES
4 - very good.46m (2 pillar) panel extension typically completed in 7 - 8
hours.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M015BMINE RESPONSES
Contractor's focus on people, systems, equipment, and associated standards.
Replacement of aged mining equipment.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M015BMINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M015BMINE RESPONSES
Implementation of place change mining.Establishment of three new mines.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M015BMINE RESPONSES
Implementation of place change mining and development of 2 new mines reported as successful.
Involvement of personnel in improving equipment suitability and availability fundamental.
Structured maintenance programs.Commitment and priority given to safety.
Establishing and maintaining work standards.
Unsuccessful mine establishment marked by lack of structured maintenance and failure to rectify equipment
suitability and availability issues. Difficult mining conditions further compounded problems created by poor equipment
standards.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M015BMINE RESPONSES
Industry has a propensity to overcomplicate equipment and systems - need to simplify.
Yes.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M016Up to 7.0m
4m
5.8m
36m X 100m
1
9Deputy, 6 miners, I mechanical and 1 electrical
tradesperson.
Joy 12CM12
4 Hydramatic Series 4000 roof bolting rigs and 2 rib bolting rigs
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M016MINE RESPONSES
1 X 15SC32 Shuttle Car.Stamler breaker feeder.
1050mm "temporary" panel conveyor.
Manual load on-board pods with 160 X 5.6m straps and 800 roof and rib bolts.
7 day production, 5 day maintenance.
10 and 12 hour production shifts, 7 day basis.7 hour maintenance shifts 5 day basis.
7 on:7 off production.5 day Monday to Friday maintenance.
Up to 280mUp to 1:10
In situ gas levels 6m3/tonne.Residual gas levels of 1 - 2m3/tonne after drainage to
highwall.
24m3/s auxiliary fan at face, 300m3/s main mine fan.
No problems experienced to date.
Labour sourced from adjacent mine during staged transition of operations.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M016MINE RESPONSES
5 years development of mine and 6 years longwall extraction to recover 34Mt
Highwall punch mine with one development unit maintaining longwall float, approximately 16kms of
development per annum.Management style and attitude.
Extent of application of short interval process control.Good machine ergonomics.
4 or 6 X 2100 X 24mm roof bolts every 1.5m, installed through 5.6m long roof straps.
2 X1200mm X 24mm rib dowels every 1.5m/rib.
13 different strata control zones identified with 13 different support systems.
4m couple bolts installed in 10% of roadways driven.6m tendons installed in 15% of roadways driven.
4 bolt pattern installed in 50% of roadways driven.6 bolt pattern installed in 25% of roadways driven
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M016MINE RESPONSES
4m couple bolts or 6m super strands in poor ground, depending upon conditions experienced.
Combination of 4m couple bolts and 6m super strands used for longwall installation face roadway drivage.
4 - very good.
4 - very good.
4 - very good.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
13.6kms
Nil - no longwall at present.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M016MINE RESPONSES
312m/week.16.288kms for 12 months.
Not projected at present.
Not projected at present.
Not projected at present.
Not projected at present.
4 - very good.Target 4MPOH, average 5MPOH across pillar cycle.
12CM12 considered to be best cutting platform available.
3 - good.Cannot bolt close to face or bolt in centre of roadway in
poor conditions.
3 - good.34t/metre advance, 3 X SC loads per 1.5m cycle.
Wheeling time considered one of the bigger constraints on performance.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M016MINE RESPONSES
4 - very good.Effective system with current roof support regime.
3 -good.Complete on average 1.5 panel advances per week, with
each move completed in one and a bit shifts.Process currently limited by installation of conveyor and pipe services in one roadway. Design to be amended for
future gate roads.
4 - very good.Maintenance scheduled on a daily basis Monday to Friday.Hydramatic Series 4000 rigs were considered to be a high maintenance component particularly in respect to slides,
packers, and hoses.
3 - good.Coal clearance one of the mine's larger delays at this stage
due to communications issues on control system - currently being addressed.
Application of short interval process control with attention to detail.
Improved performance measurement techniques promote accountability.
Utilising pareto analysis to identify key factors for improvement.
Deputy in control of face operations.Rigorous selection procedures.
Motivated crews make it happen.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M016MINE RESPONSES
Application of widehead continuous miner (5.7m wide) eliminates need for cutting out DCB, fan, and feeder niches
thereby minimising associated rework.Attention to CM ergonomics and providing fit for purpose
equipment that allows high development rates to be achieved.
Continued refinement of short interval process control and continuous improvement process.
Coal haulage.Roof and rib bolting.
Panel services and panel advances.
1 - Coal haulage.2 - Roof and rib bolting.
Panel services and panel advances.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M016MINE RESPONSES
Integrated cutting and bolting system.Self drilling bolts, including cuttable rib bolting equivalent.
Better haulage system.Reliable man transporters.
Maintenance friendly machines.
The concept of a single wide face roadway drivage with a pump pack system for installing a dividing septum was also
considered a viable alternative, as was the application of TBM technology, providing it was recognised that the
primary objective was gate road drivage, not technology development..
Noted that one of the respondents had visited a mine in China where a DBT continuous miner and bridge conveyor system was utilised to drive gateroads with reported rates
of 3,600m/month.
Availability of funding to pursue initiatives.Economics of self drilling bolts and availability of cuttable
rib bolting equivalent.
Ability of people to take responsibility and accountability for project execution.
Noted that the full cost of a lack of development performance was difficult to identify due to the propensity of mines to deploy additional resources to ensure longwall
continuity.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M016MINE RESPONSES
Integrated cutting and bolting system.Self drilling bolts, including cuttable rib bolting equivalent.
Better coal haulage systems.Reliable man transporters.
Maintenance friendly machines.Metalliferous sector technology including semi automated
cable bolting.Effective desilting systems for face pumps.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M016MINE RESPONSES
3 - very interested in industry based, incremental change.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M016MINE RESPONSES
Self drilling bolts and cuttable rib bolting equivalents in particular, others depending upon site specific relevance.
Yes, depending upon the initiative and its relevance to the mine, and providing it didn't require major funding.
ACARP was challenged to make funded R&D more effective.
Yes.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0174.0 - 4.2m3.2 - 3.4m
3.2 - 3.4m
5.2m5.2m
30m X 100m
30m X 30 - 100m
2
1
8Deputy, 5 operators, 1 mechanical and 1 electrical trades.
8Deputy, 5 operators, 1 mechanical and 1 electrical trades.
1 X ABM20 and 1 x ABM25
ABM25
4 Hydramatic Series 4000 roof bolting rigs and 2 rib bolting rigs
4 Hydramatic Series 4000 roof bolting rigs and 2 rib bolting rigs
1 X 15SC shuttle car per CM.1600mm Mains conveyor.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M017MINE RESPONSES
1 X 15SC shuttle car per CM.1200mm wide development conveyor.
SMV Brumby prime mover and pods plus MPV and pods.Approximately 20m advance per set of pods.
SMV Brumby prime mover and pods plus MPV and pods.Approximately 20m advance per set of pods.
7 days.
10 hours.
3 shifts per day, Monday to Thursday.3 shifts per day, Friday to Monday (mine employees).
3 shifts per day, Friday to Sunday (contractor's employees).
100 -120m1:30
1 -2 m3/tonne
18m3/s auxiliary fans with 760mm flexible ducting and 600mm rigid ducting.
Horizontal stress 2.3 times vertical, not an issue excepting adjacent to structures.
Stable workforce, contract weekend labour.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M017MINE RESPONSES
20+ years remaining
Aged, mature workforce.Have had major problems with slabbing of floor strata.Conditions vary widely without clear pattern, difficult to
predict limits of good/bad areas.Similarly, structures (mostly faulting) also vary widely
across mine.
6 X 2100mm roof bolts installed in 1.0m mesh modules.Increased to flex bolts where conditions warrant.
2 x 1200mm rib bolts installed per metre/rib through domed plates (no rib mesh).
6 X 2100mm roof bolts installed in 1.0m mesh modules.Increased to flex bolts where conditions warrant.
2 x 1200mm rib bolts installed per metre/rib through domed plates (no rib mesh).
6m and 8m point anchored and/or fully grouted tendons installed on a 2 per 2m spacing where conditions dictate (approximately 15% of roadways developed so treated).
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M017MINE RESPONSES
6m and 8m point anchored and/or fully grouted tendons installed on a 2 per 2m spacing where conditions dictate (approximately 15% of roadways developed so treated).
Standing supports installed in tailgate roadway prior to lo0ngwall retreat.
1 - 4 (difficult to very good).15% very difficult, 20% poor, 30% good, 35% very good
2 - 3, poor to good.Rib conditions generally don't vary a lot however adoption
of 600 angle cut throughs to facilitate monorail services management system has improved rib conditions.
2 - poor.Very hard sandstone floor throughout mine however floor slabs off and requires considerable roadworks to maintain
(3 shifts/day, 4 - 5 days per week).
1.76Mt
12.67kms
2.88Mt
7.7m/unit shift.Now utilise time to complete pillar as key indicator.
Abnormal drivage required in Mains for excavation of overcasts and driveheads - long wheeling distances
typical.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M017MINE RESPONSES
10m/unit shift.
14.6kms
4.0Mt
9.4m/unit shift.
8.0m/unit shift.
3 - good.Achieving 4MPOH against possible 6MPOH
Good coal cutting machines but not good stone cutters.ABM25 considered to be too complex - an electronics
madness with maintenance issues.
3 - - good.Bolting rigs fit for purpose however Hydramatic rigs
reported to be not as good as Joy HFX rigs.
2 - low.Capacity and age of shuttle cars.Slabby and wet floor conditions.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M017MINE RESPONSES
2.5 - low to good.Experience some delays.
Mesh carrier reported to work well however pod loading jib reported to not suit ABM25.
Reported to take some 45 minutes to change out pods.
3 - good - Mains.4 - very good - Panels.
Utilisation of monorail services management system has allowed ghost belt moves to be suspended and enables panel belt moves to be completed in less than a shift (10
hours).
3.5 - good to very good.Allow 2 shifts/week/CM for maintenance however can be
relented if circumstances dictate otherwise.With DCB mounted on monorail services management system maintenance can be completed during panel
moves a power can remain available throughout process.
4 - very good.Large lumps of longwall coal can cause problems at
transfers and at crusher.
Statistics not readily available however don't consider that there has been any significant change in annual
development levels.Used to be only some bad areas, now there are a lot of
them.Simultaneous cutting and bolting considered the norm.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M017MINE RESPONSES
Full utilisation of monorail services management system throughout the mine.
New shuttle cars>Improved face pumping strategies.
New conveyor structure.New bolting rigs
Incidence of fewer geological structures.Better road management equipment and systems.
Roof and rib bolting.Coal haulage.
Materials supply.Extension of steel services (eg; pipework).
Additional maintenance on bolting rigs.
1 - Roof and rib bolting.2 _ Materials supply system.
3 - Extension of services.3 - Coal haulage.3 - Maintenance.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M017MINE RESPONSES
Continuous haulage system and/or surge car.Self drilling bolts with automated bolting carousels.
Joy Sumps Shearer front end.Spray on rib reinforcement eg: Techflex.
Funding.Personal motivation to do it, or lack thereof.
Company vision to do it, or lack thereof.Workforce acceptance.Right bonus scheme.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M017MINE RESPONSES
Machine guidance systems.Seam following techniques.
Tunnelling sector - visit to see what is being done and can be transferred.
Freezing of underground water to in certain areas to control water make into roadways.
Noted that incremental improvements were there to be got now that the monorail services management system had
been successfully developed
Self drilling bolt, bolter automation and improved bolters.Laser guided machines.
Flexible drill rods to facilitate longer than seam height drilling.
Simplifying, minimising, or eliminating electrical bells and whistles (breakdown sources)
Trials of "flexidrill" drilling equipment.Introduction of ABM25.
Demonstration of Joy Sumps Shearer.Development of monorail services management system.
Different forms of rib support (eg; hydrafoam).Different forms of fall recovery (eg: cavity filling).
Introduction of advancing/retreating longwall mining.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M017MINE RESPONSES
Flexidrill - a good overseas system improperly applied to Australian technology - "half arsed".
ABM25 - definitely not finished with refinements and improvements.
Joy Sumps Shearer - theoretically still the best platform out there.
Monorail services - big improvement, not finished with refinements.
Alternate rib support - future concept.Advance/retreat longwall mining - an engineering feat.
Absolute necessity for a passionate champion.Necessity for strong support from corporate sector and
from OEMs.Need for perseverance and persistence.
Lack of technical expertise and support from OEMs.
3 - very interested in industry based, incremental change, subject to the relevance of any specific initiative.
Also noted that have been previously bitten by lack of OEM support and would require appropriate safeguards to
be in place before proceeding.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M017MINE RESPONSES
Different roadway support systems, equipment, hardware and consumables.
Coal clearance systems.
Yes, no dramas in this regard.
ACARP should initiate and maintain an annual roadway development conference/workshop to facilitate networking
and the transfer of ideas and technology across the industry.
ACARP should coordinate a workshop with suppliers and OEMs to express the industry's concern with their lack of
interest and support.
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0185.5 - 6.5m
3.4m
3.4m
5.2m5.2m
40m roadway centres, cut through centres vary.
2 heading gateroads, typically 100m X 48m centres but increasing to 100m X 60m with depth.
1
2Mine previously deployed two CM to a single unit and
alternated crew between CMs however is now operating the 2 CMs as a super unit. Face operations currently
impacted by ventilation, gas and geological conditions (and manning shortages) which is consistently limiting operation
of both CMs.
ABM20 Mk III
ABM25
4 Cram roof bolting rigs and 2 Cram rib bolting rigs.
4 Cram roof bolting rigs and 2 Cram rib bolting rigs.
2 Joy 15SC shuttle cars
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M018MINE RESPONSES
2 Joy 15SC shuttle cars with one SC servicing each of the two CMs that comprise the super unit.
2 on board cassettes - 20m advance per pair.
2 on board cassettes - 20m advance per pair.
7
12 hours
4 on:4 off - rotating.2 hour overlap between day and night shifts, with a
maintenance shift rostered to cover gap between night and day shifts.
280 - 450m1:12
CH4, 8 - 12m3/t.Typically drained to 3.5 - 6m3/t, with 7m3/t outburst
threshold.
2 main mine fans and booster fan with 350m3/s circulating. Currently sinking an additional ventilation shaft.
Low horizontal stress regime - principal horizontal stress 7Mpa.
No major problems experienced with labour availability of miners however some shortages experienced with ERZ
controllers and trades.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M018MINE RESPONSES
15 - 20 years remaining.
Difficult geological conditions with extensive small displacement faulting.
2.1m roof bolts, 6 bolts/metre installed in single row with full meshing of roof.
1.2m rib bolts, 3 bolts/metre/rib with full meshing of ribs.
2.1m roof bolts, 6 bolts/metre installed in single row with full meshing of roof.
1.2m rib bolts, 3 bolts/metre/rib with full meshing of ribs.
4m mega bolts installed on 2 X 2m centres in all intersections.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M018MINE RESPONSES
4m mega bolts installed on 2 X 2m centres in all intersections.
2+ - poor.
1+ - difficult.High density rib support installed to facilitate longwall
extraction.
3 - good.1.0m of bottom coal left to protect soft underlying strata. Where floor coal inadvertently mined underlying strata is
extremely difficult.Gas drainage has reduced earlier problems associated
with high in-situ water levels however floor coal now soft, friable and dry.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M018MINE RESPONSES
3 - good.1.5m/hour typically achieved.
ABM25 (and ABM Mk III) have better loading characteristics than earlier machines.
3 - good.6 bolts/metre normally installed however TARPs require
installation of 4m tendons if any geological structures encountered, then "low" effectiveness experienced.
2 - low.Considered a major constraint due to the soft, friable and dry floor coal parting left to protect soft underlying strata.
Haulage chews floor coal, particularly when wheeling around corners.
Fall of in cutting rate noted as haulage distance increases.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M018MINE RESPONSES
3+ - good.Maintenance and supply window prior to start of day shift
allows for resupply of CMs.
1 - very low.Budget 4 (12 hour) shifts, typically 5 shifts taken.
Installation of longwall conveyor structure impacts duration of panel advance.
2+ - low.New ABM25s.
Due to operational constraints typically only operating one of the super units two CMs, therefore have spare capacity.
Anticipate some problems when super unit fully operational.
3 - good.Conveyor system reported to have 97% availability.
No noticeable increase in development rates noted, although now fully meshing roadways (previously W
straps), with higher in situ gas levels as depth increases.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M018MINE RESPONSES
No noticeable increase in development rates noted, although now fully meshing roadways (previously W
straps), with higher in situ gas levels as depth increases.
More timely gas drainage and improved ventilation resulting in higher availability of units.
More timely gas drainage and improved ventilation resulting in higher availability of units.
Coal clearance.Roof and rib support.
Panel advances.Supplies and materials.
1 - Coal clearance.2 - Roof and rib support.
3 - Panel advances.4 - Supplies and materials.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M018MINE RESPONSES
Systems to facilitate utilisation of tensar mesh for roof and rib support from continuous rolls installed on CM.
Automated bolting with sufficient capacity to install all (roof and rib) bolts simultaneously.
Horizontal vacuum cleaner with CM mounted crusher to size coal to -50mm and transport coal to boot end (which
may also be the auxiliary ventilation system?).Monorail mounted services and coal haulage (keep
equipment of soft floor).Roadway design to facilitate roof support, not larger
longwall equipment.Profiling of roadways eg; TBMs.
Time and resources required to develop, trial and implement new equipment and systems - everyone
currently focussed on existing challenges, with no surplus time or resources available.
No one wants to be a guinea pig, prefer to be aggressive followers - other current and real challenges.
Potential conflict between new roadway profile and the profile of existing equipment utilised in second phase of
operation (ie; longwall equipment).
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M018MINE RESPONSES
Automation and use of robotics for bolting.
Noted that current IS standards are likely to limit the successful application of automation and robotics.
Coal clearance.Automation of bolting.
Services extensions, and maintaining standards in a high development rate environment.
KB continuous haulage.MBE.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M018MINE RESPONSES
KB continuous haulage good concept although impacted by floor conditions (eg; too hard and the system slides
across floor into ribs as it traverses corners, too soft and the hydraulic lifters sink into the floor).
MBE good for single roadway development however needs to parked up for drivage of adjacent roadways and cut
throughs.
1 (aggressive followers) or a 4 (industry step change), depending upon the specific initiative, its risk profile, and
development priorities.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M018MINE RESPONSES
Coal clearance.Developing systems to guarantee bolt encapsulation.
Dissemination of results - everyone is too busy to read and go to conferences.
Details of ACARP website provided so that participants can directly access reports - need to determine whether current
system has a facility for subject/item/word searches, and whether sites can then access reports directly,
electronically.
Yes.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0191.8m
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M019MINE RESPONSES
12 hours
4 panel 7 day with 1 hour overlap of shifts to create a 2 hour maintenance window each day.5 day X 12 hour maintenance crew.
200m1:30
In situ 2.3 - 10m3/tonneTry to drain to 2m3/tonne for longwall extraction.Outburst threshold in development 6.5m3/tonne.
Recently upgraded, no issues reported.
Stress levels not considered a major issue.
High turnover typical of Bowen Basin
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M019MINE RESPONSES
Approximately 8 years life remaining
1.8m seam thickness and thinning in future.Hard roof and floor material poses a frictional ignition risk
and is abrasive on equipment.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M019MINE RESPONSES
3 - good.
3 - good.
3 - good.
13 kms
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M019MINE RESPONSES
225m/week
23 kms (2006)
3 - good.
2 - low.Use of 12CM12s with roof bolting rigs are not considered
fit for purpose.
3 - good.Haulage constraints evident once haulage distance
exceeds 70m
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M019MINE RESPONSES
3 - good.No materials pods or cassettes utilised.
3 - good.Typically 12 hours (86 manhours)
2 - low.1 maintenance shift per panel per week
2 - low.
Overall development rate reported to have declined due to adoption of 12 hour shifts and associated roster system,
and installation of a more intensive support regime.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M019MINE RESPONSES
Additional mining unit.
Roof bolting.Panel advances.Materials supply.
Maintaining panel standards and services such as pipework.
Mining system can only be intermittent at best, without face storage/bunkering.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M019MINE RESPONSES
Integrated cutting and bolting (must be condition specific).Flanking conveyor in CM rather than centre conveyor - to allow installation of centre bolts to optimise roof support.
Wide roadway (shortwall) with installation of artificial partition to create segregated ventilation and services
roadways.Adoption of automated and semi-automated processes
from metalliferous sector.Need a step change in process to go forward.
Capital intensive.Development priorities at existing mines.
High risk (wide roadway/partitioning)
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M019MINE RESPONSES
Adoption of automated and semi-automated processes from metalliferous sector.
TBM with augering of interconnecting ventilation roadways.
Roof bolting - speeding up process.Panel advances.
Continuous haulage.Integrated system incorporating all of the above.
Improved development rates achieved through working with people and getting the detail right.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M019MINE RESPONSES
Difficulty of and time taken to obtain various approvals.Difficulty to maintain champions due to new appointments
and turnover.
3 - very interested in industry based incremental change initiatives.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M019MINE RESPONSES
Drillable bolts.Equipment reliability.
Why has it taken so long to undertake such an initiative?Need to remove the human element from the development
process.Considered that the industry may be too hard on itself as it has at least maintained development rates while utilising and installing more intensive strata support measures.
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M020MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M020MINE RESPONSES
12 hours
4 panel 7 day with 1 hour overlap of shifts to create a 2 hour maintenance window each day.5 day X 12 hour maintenance crew.
120 - 220m1:30
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M020MINE RESPONSES
Approximately 25 years life remaining
Hard roof and floor material poses a frictional ignition risk and is abrasive on equipment.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M020MINE RESPONSES
3 - good.
3 - good.
3 - good.
18 kms
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M020MINE RESPONSES
230m/week
18 kms (2006)
3 - good.
3 - good.In average going not bad, however in difficult conditions
considered to be a bit of a struggle.
3 - good.Haulage constraints evident once haulage distance
exceeds 70m
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M020MINE RESPONSES
3 - good.
3 - good.Typically 12 hours
2 - low.1 maintenance shift per panel per week
3 - good.
Overall development rate reported to have declined due to installation of more intensive support regime, including use
of mesh modules, although development rates are now recovering.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M020MINE RESPONSES
Targeting 20km/annum, subject to equipment availability.
Roof bolting.Panel advances.Materials supply.
Maintaining panel standards and services such as pipework.
Mining system can only be intermittent at best, without face storage/bunkering.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M020MINE RESPONSES
Integrated cutting and bolting (must be condition specific).Flanking conveyor in CM rather than centre conveyor - to allow installation of centre bolts to optimise roof support.
Wide roadway (shortwall) with installation of artificial partition to create segregated ventilation and services
roadways.Adoption of automated and semi-automated processes
from metalliferous sector.Need a step change in process to go forward.
Capital intensive.Development priorities at existing mines.
High risk (wide roadway/partitioning)
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M020MINE RESPONSES
Adoption of automated and semi-automated processes from metalliferous sector.
TBM with augering of interconnecting ventilation roadways.
Roof bolting - speeding up process.Panel advances.
Continuous haulage.Integrated system incorporating all of the above.
Improved development rates achieved through working with people and getting the detail right.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M020MINE RESPONSES
Difficulty of and time taken to obtain various approvals.Difficulty to maintain champions due to new appointments
and turnover.
2 - will pursue mine site initiatives.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M020MINE RESPONSES
Drillable bolts.Equipment reliability.
Why has it taken so long to undertake such an initiative?Need to remove the human element from the development
process.Considered that the industry may be too hard on itself as it has at least maintained development rates while utilising and installing more intensive strata support measures.
Yes.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0212.8m to 3.0m2.8m to 3.0m
Full seam height (2.8m to 3.0m)In soft floor conditions 300mm coal left on floor
5.2m5.2m
Nominal 100m X 35m - varies due to gateroad arrangements.
2 heading100m X35m
0 - Mains development completed
2
81 ERZ controller, 5 operators, 1mechanical and 1 electrical
tradesperson
81 ERZ controller, 5 operators, 1mechanical and 1 electrical
tradesperson
Joy 12CM32
Joy 12CM32
2 hydraulic bolters on each CM, 2 hydraulic rib borers.1.8m roof bolts, 1.2m rib bolts - single pass drilling.
2 hydraulic bolters on each CM, 2 hydraulic rib borers.1.8m roof bolts, 1.2m rib bolts - single pass drilling.
Single SC each unit feeding directly onto conveyor boot end
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M021MINE RESPONSES
Single SC each unit feeding directly onto conveyor boot end
CM mounted supply pods, loaded on surface, handled with QDS attachments.
60m development per pod.Roof mesh handled manually.
CM mounted supply pods, loaded on surface, handled with QDS attachments.
60m development per pod.Roof mesh handled manually.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M021MINE RESPONSES
1.8m long resin encapsulated bolts, 4 bolts/m (2/2 pattern).4.8m X 1.2m welded mesh roof modules.
1.2m long resin encapsulated rib bolts spot bolted as required.
1.8m long resin encapsulated bolts, 4 bolts/m (2/2 pattern).4.8m X 1.2m welded mesh roof modules.
1.2m long resin encapsulated rib bolts spot bolted as required.
Typically no rib bolts when mining perpendicular to cleat with one rib bolt installed per 1.5m (staggered) when
mining parallel to cleat.
4.1m long JSS Super Strands installed around geological features and where roadways widened in excess of 6.2m
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M021MINE RESPONSES
4.1m long JSS Super Strands installed around geological features and where roadways widened in excess of 6.2m
4 - very good.Full meshing of roof described as greatest advance in
mining technology for 20 years.
4 - very good.
3 - good - typically.1 - difficult - currently.
Soft floor conditions being experienced in current working area are not typical of remainder of mine.
Gas drainage also dries out coal with floor coal becoming more brittle and soft.
10.4 km (1994/95) - 3 development panels
2.1Mt ROM in 1994.1.87Mt in 1995.
Nil Mains development in 1995
95.8m/week/CM (1995)
10.2Km (2004/05)No 1priority CM 7.5Km.No 2 priority CM 3.2Km.
Development intensity reduced due to pending closure of mine
2.39Mt (2004/05)
No Mains development completed in period
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M021MINE RESPONSES
No 1priority CM 150m/weekNo 2 priority CM 70m/week
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 - good.Good cutting machine however design of machine is not
maintenance or breakdown friendly, eg: too high tech with control components stuffed into small places.
Machines need to be designed to allow ease of access for maintenance and breakdown.
Cutting performance limited at times by gas emission levels and ventilation limitations.
Shovel design impacts clean up performance.
3 - good.Reliability of Aro Series 4000 rigs not good - hoses.
Roof bolting rigs not capable of installing best geotechnical design which results in sub-optimum design to fit in with
machine capabilities, particularly centre bolts.
3 - good.CM often waiting on SC when wheeling distance 100m or
more.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M021MINE RESPONSES
3 - good.Pods changed when empty - 40 to 60 minutes delay to
change out.
2 - low.Typically 24 hours to complete 100m panel extension.Previous system with use of specialist belt crew and
suitable roadway development sequencing allowed panel extensions to be completed in 6 - 8 hours (duplicate boot
end, fan and cabling, with conveyor extension partially completed in first driven conveyor roadway).
2 - low.Development constrained, chasing development,
preventative maintenance restricted resulting in numerous breakdowns.
3 - goodEstimated at 90% availability.
Changed development sequence and use of specialist belt crew (contractors) enabled panel moves to be completed
in 6 - 8 hours, which provided an additional 2 shifts development per week per CM, or 3 additional shifts if
extension completed over weekend (5 day development only).
Cut and flit development system trialed however gas emission levels, short plunges and 2 heading gateroads
impacted performance of system.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M021MINE RESPONSES
7 day development operations with additional units.Integrated cutting and bolting CM (eg; ABM20) with FCT coal clearance incorporating ventilation and services on
monorail.Need to have ABM head rated for cutting high MPa strata.
Reintroduction of specialist belt crews and modified development sequence.
Include development teams into planning and scheduling processes to improve ownership.
Automated drill rigs, however need to be able to manually install bolts in event of breakdowns.
14BU surge loaders or bunkering systems
Extension of face services (ventilation, power, water).Residual gas emission in high permeability strata and
ventilation limitations.Supply system limitations.
1 - Face ventilation.2 - Roof support.
3 - Haulage system.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M021MINE RESPONSES
Continuous, integrated cutting and bolting with continuous coal haulage and/or temporary coal bunkering, FCT
mounted face services (eg; ventilation, power and water), fan mounted on monorail.
Sequencing of panel development to allow conveyor extensions in parallel with development.
Hot seat change.Specialists (or contractors) doing services extensions.Automated bolting (with provision for manual bolting).Utilisation of appropriate high wall mining technologies
including horizon control and machine guidance systems.Improved support systems ...Automated meshing systems.
Fully automated CM - Mojura TBM?
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M021MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M021MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M021MINE RESPONSES
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0227.0m
3.0 - 3.2m
3.0 - 3.2m
4.8m4.8m
40m X 50 - 160m
47m X 110m
1Single unit.
1Tandem or dual unit.
91 deputy, 6 miners, 1 mechanical and 1 electrical trades.
Responsible for all internal absenteeism in crew.
151 deputy, 12 miners, 1 mechanical and 1 electrical trades
in tandem unit.Responsible for all internal absenteeism in crew.
12CM30
2 X 12CM30
4 Hydramatic Series 4000 semi automated roof bolting rigs, and 2 Hydramatic rib bolting rigs.
Temporary rib support shields fitted
4 Hydramatic Series 4000 semi automated roof bolting rigs, and 2 Hydramatic rib bolting rigs.
Temporary rib support shields fitted
1 x Joy 15SC.1400mm Mains conveyor.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M022MINE RESPONSES
1 x Joy 15SC/CM.1200mm Panel conveyor.
CM mounted supply pods, loaded off site, transported with PETs and handled with QDS attachments.
Pods changed out almost every shift.Dayshift responsible for ordering supplies on a 24 hour
basis.
CM mounted supply pods, loaded off site, transported with PETs with monorails used in face area.Pods changed out almost every shift.
Dayshift responsible for ordering supplies on a 24 hour basis.
5 days per week.
8 hours Monday to Friday.12 hour weekend shifts.
Permanent roster.Two 12 hour shifts available of a weekend for pro=duction
if required.
390m - 420mFlat, 1% dip.
No in situ gas.
18m3/s fan in tandem unit, 12m3/s fan in single unit, 120m3/s main mine fan.
No heat or dust issues experienced.5 7 MPa horizontal stress.
High stress zones around geological structures.Stress notching evident.
Coal strength 8MPa.Low labour turnover although some staff turnover reported.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M022MINE RESPONSES
30 years life of mine remaining.
No gas, no spontaneous combustion risk.Water management (15Ml/day) major issue, particularly in Mains and from longwall goaves - can double flow rates at
times.Strata control also major issue.
Employees incentive scheme based on development metres mined, safety and quality - no longwall component.
Minimum standard 6 X 2100mm roof bolts/metre and 3 X 1200mm rib bolts/metre/rib, with full roof and rib meshing.
13 different support regimes under SMP, with up to 4 X 8m JSS tendons/metre in worst conditions.
4 X 8m JSS tendons/metre in intersections, commencing 6m either side of centreline.
Surface topography is major issue with mine area crossed by series of valleys and high escarpments.
Stress channelling evident beneath valleys, and 2 X 8m JSS tendons/metre installed under valleys.
Basalt plate lies some 860m below seam and major structures reflected in coal seams as lineaments. 4 X 8m JSS tendons/metre installed through lineament zones.
Minimum standard 6 X 2100mm roof bolts/metre and 3 X 1200mm rib bolts/metre/rib, with full roof and rib meshing.
13 different support regimes under SMP, with up to 4 X 8m JSS tendons/metre in worst conditions.
4 X 8m JSS tendons/metre in intersections, commencing 6m either side of centreline.
Surface topography is major issue with mine area crossed by series of valleys and high escarpments.
Stress channelling evident beneath valleys, and 2 X 8m JSS tendons/metre installed under valleys.
Basalt plate lies some 860m below seam and major structures reflected in coal seams as lineaments. 4 X 8m JSS tendons/metre installed through lineament zones.
Passive supports, cables and tendons installed as required.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M022MINE RESPONSES
Fit as mush secondary support as can be done prior to longwall extraction.
1 additional 8m cable/metre installed where roadway previously supported with tenons, 2 X 8m cables/metre
installed in areas not previously tendoned.Lag of up to 2 years between development and secondary
support installation.
Longwall installs cans in next tailgate roadway prior to extraction
2 - poor on average.CMs and roof bolters set up for conditions.
1 - difficult.Full meshing of ribs with 3 rib bolts/metre/rib.
3 - good.Hard sandstone capping 150 -300mm thick. Conditions
good unless capping cut and soft underlying strata exposed.
Floor and roof swilleys also occur throughout mine.
6kms (1997).
2.2MT (1997).1997 first year of longwall operations
12 - 13kms (2003 and 2004).
2.4Mt (2004).
225 - 275m/week overall for 3 CMs with 39 X 8 hour and 2 X 12 hour cutting shifts.
Time to complete pillar cycle is KPI, not metres/week or metres/shift.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M022MINE RESPONSES
23 - 24 shifts to complete a pillar, including 2.5 shifts for panel advance - best 15 shifts with 1.5 shifts for panel
advance.Due to difference in drivage requirements between two
CMs in 2 entry gateroads, 1 X CM not manned on D/S with labour allocated to preparatory works.
Annual development requirement will reduce to approximately 6kms.
3.0 - 3.2Mt.
No change in development rates projected, budget based on actual achieved.
No change in development rates projected, budget based on actual achieved.
3 - good.Only cutting 15 - 20% of time, CM is predominantly a
bolting platform.
2 - low.Bolters fit for purpose although high downtime experienced
with hoses and slides.
Major work undertaken to enable 8m tendons to be installed at face in 8 minutes or less.
3 - good.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M022MINE RESPONSES
3 - good.Don't lose to much time however do preparatory works
between all shifts - change pods, etc.PETs used to transport materials, with monorail used in gateroad to handle oils, cables, hoses, bolts - reduces
manhandling.
3 - good - gateroads (pinned ACE structure).1 - very low - mains (bolted structure, no process plan,
more services, more clean up).
3 - good.Planned maintenance 2 shifts/week with 1 shift on rigs and
1 shift on rest of machine.Allocate a lot of people as rigs take a lot of time.
Problem with machines not working properly after being overhauled.
3 - good, but improving.Currently upgrading system to remove capacity
constraints.
Better planning and process control.Better strata control.
CM upgrades.Materials handling improvements.Improved machine ergonomics.Improved logistics and supply.
Ensuring development focus is maintained.
Still looking for improvements in drill steels, drill bits, bolts and plates.
Not scared to try new products.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M022MINE RESPONSES
Will need to drop development unit off as will be to far in front of longwall.
Opportunity to address interaction issues in dual or tandem mining units.
Bolting constraints.
1 - Bolting constraints.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M022MINE RESPONSES
Self drilling bolts.Automated bolting systems to get personnel out of
immediate face area.Fancy materials handling system.
Incorporation of all services on monorail system.Alternative loading system (to E/W conveyors) that clean
up better and still enable supports to be installed at immediate face.
Automation of cutting process.Automation of long tendon installation process.
automation of installation of roof monitoring systems.
Ensuring the specifications of self drilling bolts meets likely requirements across a broad spectrum of mine conditions.
Cost of hardware.Ribs a bigger problem than roof at the mine.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M022MINE RESPONSES
Road building technology to facilitate rapid transport of men and materials.
Lighter, more effective face pumps.Automated bolting machines for installation of secondary
supports.
Fit for purpose automated bolting systems that get personnel out of the immediate face area.
Materials handling systems, including monorail mounted systems.
Cleaning up of the 12CM30 (ie; E/W conveyor).
Systems approach.Joy Sumps Shearer.
Mobile boot end behind advancing CM.Klockner Becorit continuous haulage system
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M022MINE RESPONSES
Systems approach - reasonable standards prior to commencement, looked at people issues and got people
involved and buying in. good improvements on cutting time and downtime.
Joy Sumps Shearer - good work platform, electrical problems not sorted out.
Mobile boot end - went OK but not a good trial, not long enough.
KB continuous haulage - breakaways an issue, ventilation also an issue as haulage is attached to CM.
Systems approach - unit of measure must be relevant to what you are doing - understanding the process and
measuring performance according to the process. Need someone to drive it all the time, to monitor activities, and
do things with it.Auditing of standards to make sure work is being done,
and to follow up on things to be done.
3 - 4, very interested in industry based incremental and step change initiatives.
Mine has a good record of involvement in R&D and continuous improvement.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M022MINE RESPONSES
The whole mix - bolts, strata, water.
Yes.
ACARP needs to adopt proactive approach to research and development - mine has been unsuccessful in gaining
ACARP support on a number of projects aimed at improving the level of understanding of ground water, and
subsidence. Should focus R&D on safety issues associated with
bolting to remove people from the immediate face area.Should also focus R&D on machine guidance and forward
seeking seam detection.
Yes.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0231.6 - 2.2m
2.6 generally, with some roadways driven at 3.3m for long term trunk returns
2.6m
5.0m5.0m
100m X 25m typically
Typically 75m X 39.5m in gateroads.
3Two units operating in tandem in 4 heading Mains
development of new mine area, plus one single unit in other Mains development.
2 continuous miners in a 2 entry super unit configuration.
142 deputies, 10 miners, 1 mechanical and 1 electrical trades
in tandem unit.8
1 deputy, 5 miners, 1 mechanical and 1 electrical trades in single unit
131deputy, 10 miners, 1 mechanical and 1 electrical trades in
super unit.
2 Joy 12CM30 plus 1 Joy 12CM30(Waratah)
1 Joy 12CM30 plus 1 Joy 12CM30(Waratah)
The two Joy 12CM30s have Joy HFX rigs, total 2 rigs per machine (including roof and rib).
The Joy 12CM30(Waratah) has 2 machine mounted Hydramatic Series 4000 rigs (including roof and rib).
Both the Joy 12CM30 and the Joy 12CM30(Waratah) have Joy HFX rigs, total 2 rigs per machine (including roof
and rib).
The tandem unit utilises 3 DBT battery haulers to haul coal back from the two continuous miners to a side loading
Stamler feeder breaker.The single CM unit utilises 2 Waracar 15SC shuttle cars
directly loading onto a Stamler feeder breaker.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M023MINE RESPONSES
The two CM super unit utilises 2 Waracar 15SC shuttle cars directly loading onto the 1200mm wide panel
conveyor.
Both mains and gate roads utilise a materials pod system. These universal pods sit on the top decks of the A series
CMs and are loaded onto the CMs with a Roberts Engineering QDS loading jib. The pods are brought
underground on dedicated materials pod trailers with the use of Eimco 913 LHDs. Typically advance 30m/set of
pods.
Development 5 day 24 hour basis, with longwall mining on a 7 day 24 hour basis
8 hour shifts plus voluntary 1 hours overtime for the ninth hour Monday to Friday.
12 hour shifts Saturday - Sunday.Fixed roster system with three nominal 8 hour shifts
Monday to Friday and two 12 hour shifts of weekend (for longwall and mine services).
420 - 460mTypically 1:20 to 1:33.
Insitu gas levels are approx 13m3/tonne with gas composition typically 75% CO2 and 25% CH4 in current
area. Residual levels vary depending on a number factors but with approximately 90 days of drainage are generally
around 4 – 5 m3/tonne and are below threshold levels, excepting in areas that experience tight, extremely low
permeability coal..
Studies underway to determine options to improve and upgrade overall mine ventilation system.
High horizontal stress regime with the orientation of the principal stress direction being modified around geological
structures.
Difficult to obtain experienced personnel. Turnover typically low however now being affected by labour poaching.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M023MINE RESPONSES
15 years plus remaining in leases area.
High insitu gas levels with high CO2 levels necessitates intense gas drainage measures prior to mining. Grunching
employed to negotiate tight, poorly drained areas.High horizontal stress regime in certain areas of mine
which requires extensive primary and secondary support. Yield pillars adopted in Mains development.
8 x 2.1m AX fully encapsulated high tensile steel roof bolts installed per metre advance in a 4/4 pattern, and are pre-
tensioned 10 tonnes.Four roof bolts are installed on the overlap section of a
1.2m x 4.8m mesh module approx 900mm to the right and left of centre and then 200mm from the rib line. The next set of 4 bolts are installed forward of the overlap and are set to the roof approx 600 mm right and left of centre and
approx 800mm in from each rib.Rib support is by use of steel rib mesh (100mm x 100m
1.4m long x 600 wide). Two 4m JSS tendons are installed every 2 metres and no more than 2 sets of these tendons are left untensioned
before mining forward. Tension on these bolts is set to 20 tonne. These supports are standard in the tandem panel and on an "as needs" basis in panels as determined by
TARPS.
Roof support in panel development is as per the Mains development.
On the block side rib 1.2m fibreglass rib dowels are installed at 1m intervals in a staggered W pattern. Dowels are fully encapsulated with a 230mm plastic bearing plate.
The chain pillar rib uses the same thrust dowel support except that 1.4m long, 0.6m high rib mesh sheets are
installed behind the plastic bearer plate.
Typically one 8m long mega bolt is installed per metre, with two 8m mega bolts per metre installed in extreme
conditions. Mega bolts are tensioned (20 - 24 tonne) at installation and post-grouted.
Lag between mining and installation depends upon mine priorities and roadway monitoring by geotechnical
engineer.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M023MINE RESPONSES
As for Mains development.
2 - poor.
3 - good.Ribs generally not a problem during development.
2 - poor.Up to 0.5m of floor heave experienced shortly after mining and roadways are routinely brushed to maintain roadway
height specifications.
9.08kms - 1995 calendar year.
1.234M tonne - 1995 calendar year.
48.2m/week - 1995 calendar year.
63.5m/week - 1995 calendar year.
15.47kms
1.937M tonne.
33.1m/week.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M023MINE RESPONSES
59.9m/week.
13.4kms.
2.6M tonne.
64m/week/CM.
64m/week/CM.
2+ - low.Typically cut 0.4m to 1.0m of floor stone and 0.2m roof
stone to achieve required height specification. E/W conveyors on CM experience considerable difficulties
dealing with floor stone, whilst the CM has major problems breaking away cut throughs due to canch of floor stone
and shovel limitations (noted that these CMs are designed to cut coal, not stone).
Typically achieving 13m/shift in straight development, reducing to 4m/shift during breakaways.
2 - low.Low height A series machines limit ability to install bolting
platforms.When bolters are working they do a great job however they
are considered to be very unreliable and have low availability.
Noted that CM was specified for 2 roof/rib bolting rigs at purchase due to perceived unreliability of rigs.
Also noted that unreliability and low availability of machine mounted rigs will limit performance of a new generation
integrated cutting and bolting mining system.Concerns expressed due to the over-engineering of bolting rigs as a result of the application of risk management and its basic assumption that miners are idiots and that soft
barriers are insufficient and/or ineffective.
3 - good.Development sequence designed to integrate and optimise
support installation and shuttle car wait time.Noted that the Warracar 15SCs were fitted with larger
cable drums that allowed 270m of cable storage on drum, which had benefits in certain parts of development
process.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M023MINE RESPONSES
3 - good.Mine utilises a "pull system" with standardised pods to manage logistics system. Improved management of oil
supply and logistics required.
2 - low.Typically completing 75m move in 24 - 27 hours, which is a significant improvement on performance achieved prior to
introduction of process approach for panel moves.
2+ - low.Each machine scheduled for 1 maintenance shift per week
on a routine basis, although overall maintenance scheduled managed flexibly to incorporate panel
development cycle.Configuring of hydraulic hoses on CMs considered a major
problem due to non standard installation by OEM, and routing of hoses under supply pods.
Bolting rigs extremely costly in respect to maintenance resources and operating delays.
Major concerns expressed regarding lack of OEM support, failure of OEM to warrant equipment, and failure of OEM to incorporate current generation hydraulic components and
systems on equipment.3+ - good.
Typically 98 - 99% availability with high capacity, state of the art system.
An additional mining unit.Higher utilisation of mining units due to fewer panel
relocations.
Upgraded and improved coal clearance system, with improved conveyor monitoring facilities allowing rapid
deployment of personnel in event of outages.Use of on board bolting rigs in lieu of hand held bolters, and pre-tensioning of roof bolts which has allowed bolt density to be decreased (ie; 8bolts/0.9m increased to 8
bolts/1m).Outburst management gas thresholds reduced while
operation of CMs is now by remote in lieu of enclosed on-board operators compartments.
Adoption of process control approach to manage development process.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M023MINE RESPONSES
As per Mains above.
Projecting development to increase from 15.5kms in 2004/05 to 22kms in 2005/06.
Expect that improved development rates will be achieved through improved reliability of face equipment, avoidance of major floor brushing during development by deployment of a fit for purpose brushing CM, improved process control
and process support, better maintenance practices and systems.
Capacity and availability constraints and limitations of support installation (bolting) system.
Duration of panel advances.Materials supply system, particularly in and around face
area.
1 - Bolting.2 - Panel advances.3 - Materials supply
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M023MINE RESPONSES
Minimum capacity 30m/8 hour shift, full automation and integration of cutting and bolting processes, with alignment
control of support installation, integrated coal clearance system with services incorporated on a monorail type system, integrated supply and logistics, detachable cut through driving element, roadway profile designed to
optimise roof support process.Different machines and systems for gateroad and cut
through drivages.Cut through spacing extended to 300m or thereasbouts,
depending upon requirements of longwall, with interconnecting auger driven roadways mined as required
for ventilation.Supply of continuous length tendons with on board cutting
devices.Extendable panel conveyor and services (during normal
mining operations).Single entry roadway system, potentially incorporating
larger arched section roadways to optimise roof support and ventilation.
Integration of coal haulage and ventialtion systyems ie; pneaumatic coal transport.
Safety considerations regarding single entry drivages and the needs for secondary escape and NSW CMRA
limitations.Logistics of labour and materials supply in a single entry
roadway. Commitment and support of OEM.
Corporate support.Managing business risk during trials and development.Inflexibility of equipment design for cut through drivage.Poor track record of managing the change process in
mines generally, and a failure to build employee support, commitment and buy in to the improvement initiatives and
processesInability or unwillingness to share information across
industry.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M023MINE RESPONSES
Considered that component parts and technology is currently available although needs to be integrated into a
complete system.One pass, self drilling bolts.
Improving component and equipment reliability.Integrated supply systems for high development rates.
In-seam exploration and seam following/machine guidance technologies.
Automated bolting process including self drilling bolt.Improved gas drainage effectiveness and drilling
techniques, particularly in regards to extending the range of compliance drilling technology .
Development of continuous haulage system.
Dosco In-Seam Miner.Kemcoal Beaver II.
Satellite Bolters.ABM20.
Road headers.Mobile bolter and two phase bolting.Farthing West process management.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M023MINE RESPONSES
Dosco In-Seam Miner - good roadway profile.Mobile bolter - not utilised for two phase bolting (due to
lack of commitment and follow up).Farthing West process management - very successful.
Dosco In-Seam Miner - lack of OEM support, project not part of overseas based OEM's core business.
Kemcoal Beaver II - Couldn't turn corners, although could cut and bolt simultaneously. Face ventilation issues.
Satellite bolters - not compatible with variable seam profile and seam thickness.
ABM20 - prototype, lack of OEM support. Need to ensure commitment from OEMs and mine
operators.
1- aggressive followers.Can't afford another prototype.
Doesn't have the longwall float necessary to trial and develop new technology - cannot afford the business risk
associated with introduction of new technology, even though the mine needs to reduce the number of operating
development units.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M023MINE RESPONSES
Ventilation and gas drainage.
From a corporate perspective would be interested in supporting industry research and development although mine not in a position to be directly involved for some 2
years.Review is long overdue, however need to get the next
steps right and avoid any further failures.Research use of aluminium underground.
Establish common regulations and standards across NSW and Queensland.
Pursue in-seam exploration and seam following/machine guidance technologies.
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M024MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M024MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M024MINE RESPONSES
40 hour per week limitation on employees in accordance with Certified Agreement.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M024MINE RESPONSES
14.5kms
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M024MINE RESPONSES
2 - low.1 X Joy HM9, 2 X Joy 12CM12, 1 X DBT 30MBT
Currently achieving 1.8 - 2.0MPOH
2 - low.2 rigs on either side of Joy HM9 considered not fit for
purpose.Hydramatic Series 4000 rigs on Joy 12CM12 and DBT 30 MBT to be changed out for Joy HFX rigs with a number of
ergonomic issues on current configurations to be addressed during the changeout .
3 - good.Despite a combination of 1978 version Noyes shuttle cars,
Warracars, and Joy 15SCs.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M024MINE RESPONSES
2 - low.
2 - - low.Breaker feeder with roof mounted structure, typically 30 - 36 hours to complete panel advance in dual miner panel.Mine currently has a number of improvement initiatives
currently underway, with panel advances being one of the four key projects.
2 - low.Mine currently has a number of improvement initiatives
currently underway, with maintenance improvement being one of the four key projects.
3 - good.
An additional mining unit coupled with increasing the days worked from 5 to 7.
Mining conditions have deteriorated and require increased levels of roadway support, including installation of mesh
modules.Increased water make being experienced with resulting
deterioration in floor conditions (12Ml/day pumped from the mine).
Currently in the process of rationalising the amount of development required to support ongoing operations.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M024MINE RESPONSES
An additional development unit will be required for a period of 18 - 24 months to develop roadways to access a new
mining area.Moving to introduce a better roster arrangement to improve
mine utilisation (eg; 10 hour shifts Mon - Thurs A/S and N/S, 8.5 hour shift Mon - Fri D/S (9 day fortnight), with two
12 hour weekend shifts Fri - Sun).
Improved roster arrangements.Improved level of process control and accountability.
Improved management skills.
Improved roster arrangements.Improved level of process control and accountability.
Improved management skills.
Coal clearance.Bolting and roadway support.
Supplies and logistics, services and panel moves.
1 - Logistics (due to distance travelled).2 - coal clearance.
3 - Support installation.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M024MINE RESPONSES
Integrated, continuous coal mining system capable of continuously supporting roof.
TBM has been actively considered for an adjacent, new mine development however were unable to get support to
develop and demonstrate the system.
Ability to sponsor and support high capital cost of developing and demonstrating TBM system.
Variability of coal seams across industry which necessitates a variety of mining configurations for differing
seam conditions.Industrial constraints limiting the realisation of automated
bolting systems (with subsequent labour reductions).
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M024MINE RESPONSES
Automation of total mining system.Improved communications and control systems.
Equipment - integrated, automated mining system.Exploration - ability to confidently plan mining operations.
Information and management support systems.
ACARP industry workshops (1995).Continuous improvement process.In-mine improvement initiatives.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M024MINE RESPONSES
ACARP workshops - a lot of people but little outcome.Continuous improvement - mostly process oriented, quite
successful.In-mine improvements - variable, consistency of
application difficult to maintain.
Can get improved results through application of continuous improvement process.
However, in current environment at mine will require step change in mining process to establish more appropriate
systems and workforce behaviours (technological determinism).
2 - 4 , incremental mine site initiatives to industry based step change, depending upon technology being pursued.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M024MINE RESPONSES
Development and demonstration of TBM technology at new mine site.
Mobile boot ends and/or extensible panel conveyors.
Yes, depending upon corporate approval.
Yes.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0253.2 - 3.5m2.8 - 2.9m
2.8 - 2.9m
5.4m5.4m
30m X 60m (varies)
45m X 102m (angled cut throughs).
1 dual (two CM) miner unit.1 mine crew plus 1 contract crew.
1 dual (two CM) miner unit.
111 deputy, 8 operators, 1 mechanical and 1 electrical trades
per dual miner unit.
111 deputy, 8 operators, 1 mechanical and 1 electrical trades
per dual miner unit.
1 X 12CM12 and 1 X 12CM29.
2 X 12CM12.
2 Joy HFX roof bolting rigs per machine, no rib bolting rigs.Rib bolts installed with hand held bolters or Fletcher mobile
bolter if required.
2 Joy HFX roof bolting rigs per machine, no rib bolting rigs.Rib bolts installed with hand held bolters or Fletcher mobile
bolter if required.
1 X SC per CM (2 per unit).Breaker feeder discharges onto 1400mm Mains conveyor.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M025MINE RESPONSES
1 X SC per CM (2 per unit).No breaker feeder, 1200mm panel conveyor.
Pod base system, 66m advance per set of pods.
Pod base system, 66m advance per set of pods.
5 day production.Weekend maintenance.
8.5 hour shifts
Monday to Friday 5 day roster.
Up to 265 - 280m in panels, and 140m in Mains.Localised seam grades up to 1:15.
High CH4 content, >10m3/tonne at depth.Post drainage of longwall goaf only.
Mining induced stress evident at 140m depth with horizontal stress also becoming an issue at depths >300m.
No labour issues and no labour turnover.Establish of new mine in vicinity may result in some
turnover due to limited projected mine life.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M025MINE RESPONSES
Project mine closure in 2010 unless access gained to further, limited reserves in close proximity.
Operate as a small business and considered to be very outcome focussed.
Dynamic ownership situation evolved over first 10 years of mine, consequently mine has point to prove.
Mine culture considered to be better than most.
6 X 2100mm roof bolts/metre, spot bolted, and installed on a 4/2 pattern.
Mesh modules used in areas where conditions warrant - approximately 50% of roadways meshed.
Rib support (1200mm bolts and tensar mesh) used in some areas where conditions warrant - approximately 50%
of roadways so supported.
6 X 2100mm roof bolts/metre, spot bolted, and installed on a 4/2 pattern.
Probably could utilise 4 bolts/metre for development, however additional bolts required for longwall retreat
Mesh modules used in areas where conditions warrant - approximately 50% of roadways meshed.
Rib support (1200mm bolts and tensar mesh) used in some areas where conditions warrant - approximately 50%
of roadways so supported.
6m Hi-ten bolts and/or Mega bolts as required from monitoring in accordance with SMP. Typically installed at
3m spacing on roadway centre line.Ribs of conveyor and transport roadways are meshed with
steel mesh as secondary support function.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M025MINE RESPONSES
6m 65 tonne capacity Hi-tens installed in intersections and in accordance with hazard mapping, typically one per 2
metre spacing.Ribs of chain pillar meshed with steel mesh and 1200mm
mechanically anchored rib bolts as secondary support function.
3 - good.
3 - good.Installation of rib supports with hand held bolters has major impact on productivity (approximately 20% of time). CMs to
be retrofitted with machine mounted rib bolters.
3 - good.
14kms.1 continuos miner, 3 shuttle cars in place changing
configuration.0.46Mt
260m/week or 1,200m/month.
260m/week or 1,200m/month.
14kms.
3.13Mt
160m/week (contract crew with 12CM29) or for 1 CM unit in Mains.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M025MINE RESPONSES
280m/week for dual unit in panel development
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
3 - good.4.8MPOH for 2CM dual unit in gateroad development.
3 - good.Approximately 1.0 hour per pillar lost for roof bolting, although hand bolting of ribs impacts development
performance.
3+ - good.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M025MINE RESPONSES
2+ - 3- - low to good
3+ - good1200mm roof mounted longwall structure, typically 11 -
12.5 hours to complete panel advance in dual miner panel.A Hdg miner stops and installs pipework when at distance, and panel move commenced when B Hdg and cut through
completed. Reported time does not include idle time associated with
installation of pipework in A Hdg.
4 - very good.5 day operation with weekend maintenance plus one shift maintenance per week during scheduled trunk conveyor
maintenance. 96 - 97% availability of face equipment reported.
3+ - good
Annual development performance static over period however have gone from single unit place change
operation to multiple unit in-place roadway development system, with increased support requirements as mine has
deepened.
Increased roadway support measures have impacted development productivity.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M025MINE RESPONSES
6m cut outs initially utilised in a 2 CM super unit however increased delamination and loss of bolt encapsulation led to subsequent issues in gateroad support during longwall mining. Dual mining units then adopted with bolts installed
in a 4/2 sequence and 6 bolt/m pattern
Looking at a life of mine extension (beyond 2010) in area previously excised by faulting.
Increased development productivity and increased number of development units (on part time basis).
Working on systems to improve target setting, communications, short interval process control, reporting
and recording of delays, and shift debriefing.
Working on systems to improve target setting, communications, short interval process control, reporting
and recording of delays, and shift debriefing.
Roof and rib support (system now in balance).Coal clearance.
Advancement of services.Panel advances.
1 - Roof and rib support.2 - Coal clearance.3 - Panel advance.4 - Panel services.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M025MINE RESPONSES
Alternate method for driving of cut throughs to reduce time to break away, time to drive, and reduce issues associated
with holing through and exclusion zones.Self drilling roof bolts and automated bolting system
incorporating utilising cassetted materials supply systems. Dosco In-Seam Miner or Joy Sumps Shearer styled
roadway development machine, with alternate cut through driivage system.
Use of temporary roof support system (TRS) in immediate face area to allow roof and rib bolting to be done away
from immediate face area.
Competition for resources and $ - do we refine current technology or invest in new technology?
Boom and bust, a failure to implement and maintain strategic research initiatives through business cycles.
Longwall focus, coupled with an instant reward culture eg; fill the boat that's coming in, regardless).
Unwillingness to invest same amount of $ in roadway development improvement initiatives as has been invested
in longwall improvement initiatives.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M025MINE RESPONSES
Self drilling bolts.Automated bolting.
Bolt cassettes.Articulated continuous miners to maintain high development rates whilst mining cut throughs.
Articulated shuttle cars to increase payload capacity and improve turning capabilities.
Roof and rib support technology (to enable 30 - 60m/hour advance rates to be achieved, based upon the cutting
capacity of current generation 12CM12 continuous miners).
Coal clearance (if it wasn't for going around corners, the FCT).
Continuous, extensible conveyor systems.
Single entry drivages.FCT.
Bridge conveyors.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M025MINE RESPONSES
Single entry drivages - utilised as a spontaneous combustion control, not a as productivity initiative. 3.6km
long panels developed after holing across planned longwall block at 1.6km chainage with 3.4m wide ventilation
roadway. Utilised 900mm diameter ducting and 24m3/s auxiliary fan. All necessary controls developed and implemented to manage associated risks, however
improvements would be necessary in regards to logistics and supplies (belt move every day!).
FCT - successful, 170m range, 1 man control.Bridge conveyor - labour intensive, over engineered
generally although traction system under engineered.
Single entry development - need for process control to manage process, difficulty supply face with rail mounted
supply system beside conveyor due to poor track maintenance standards (monorail would be more
effective), system limited to 1.6km due to the technology then available (eg; transformers and ventilation).
FCT - high standard of installation of roof mounted monorail required, difficulties transitioning coal from roof
mounted FCT onto floor mounted panel conveyor, traction mules had limited ability to drive conveyor if any of the
drive rollers were worn.Bridge conveyors - require hard floor conditions particularly around boot end where there is a lot of tramming as unit is moved from place to place, limited range (128m), labour
intensive.
3 - 4, very interested in industry based incremental and step change initiatives, depending upon other issues at mine at the time, and providing we can get some short
term benefit, or life of mine extension.Recognise that may have limited benefit at the mine due to limited mine life however would expect to spin off benefits
to other mines in company.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M025MINE RESPONSES
Self drilling bolt, particularly the rib bolt equivalent.
Yes, depending upon corporate approval.
Need to develop a really good continuous miner monitoring system, similar to that utilised on longwalls - can help drive
step change in development performance with improved monitoring.
Big gains to be made from focussing on strata support and continuous haulage systems.
Keep it simple.Onerous approval process in Australian mines, very
conservative departments.Pursue use of aluminium underground.
Utilisation of civil engineering and tunnelling technology to drive wider roadways.
How many "development journals" are published?Lack of recognition for development - if we do better all we
get is another belt move!
Need to encourage Sandvik to develop an integrated bolting system rather than rely on outsourcing this key process (and to take responsibility for its performance).
Yes
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0262.4 - 2.7m
3.2m
3.2m
4.8m4.8m
35m X 125m
47.8m X 125m
2
2
1 X 12CM20, 1 X 12CM30
1 X 12CM30, 1 X 12CM32
4 roof bolt rigs and 2 rib bolt rigs per machine, with both Joy and Hydramatic rigs used.
4 roof bolt rigs and 2 rib bolt rigs per machine, with both Joy and Hydramatic rigs used.
1 shuttle car per continuous miner.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M026MINE RESPONSES
1 shuttle car per continuous miner.
Eimco, trailers and supply pods.
Eimco, trailers and supply pods.
7 days per week
N/S and D/S 10 hours, A/S 8 hours.Weekends 12 hours.
4 development units operate N/S and D/S Monday, Wednesday and Thursday.
2 development units operate A/S Monday - Thursday.Maintenance on D/S Tuesday and Friday.
2 development units operate D/S Saturday and Sunday.
420 - 500m1:20
In situ gas levels 14m3/tonne. Residual gas levels after drainage 5 - 6m3/tonne.
Varies from predominantly methane to 50:50 CO2:CH4.
No ventilation issues typically experienced in development excepting when completing long drivages.
Mine has installed booster fan underground.High horizontal stress levels, typically 2 - 2.5 times vertical
stress. Principal stress direction varies.
Labour availability limited.Operating unit short-manned and with sub-contract labour.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M026MINE RESPONSES
10 - 12 years at current planned production levels.
In situ gas levels and gas composition.Mine ventilation system.
Distance travelled to working districts.
6 X 2100mm roof bolts/metre with full mesh.2 X 1800mm steel rib bolts/metre/rib installed through half
roadway height rib mesh.
6 X 2100mm roof bolts/metre with full mesh.2 X 1800mm steel or plastic rib bolts/metre/rib installed
through half roadway height rib mesh.
Fully grouted mega bolts installed as required, based upon geological mapping.
PUR applied and Tin Cans installed in some areas.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M026MINE RESPONSES
Fully grouted mega bolts installed as required, based upon geological mapping - mega bolt intensity varies from 1
bolt/2 metres to 3 bolts per metre. PUR applied and Tin Cans installed in some areas.
Tin Cans installed in tailgate roadways.Typically 6 - 12 month lage between mining and installation
of secondary support.
2 - poor.
2 - poor.
3 - good.
11.8kms
2.21M tonne
100m/week/CM
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M026MINE RESPONSES
100m/week/CM
Approximately 15kms per annum
Noted that gas content and ventilation infrastructure will limit overall capacity of mine.
2 - low.Achieving 1.6 - 1.7MPOH against target 3.0MPOH
although noted that actual cutting is not the constraint.
2 - low.Rib bolting is the major constraint on development rates.Roof and rib bolting is considered to be the "critical path"
and it was noted that the development process did not become haulage constrained until the face was 180 - 200m
from boot end.
2 - low.Aged and haggard shuttle cars combined with poor
roadway conditions result in less than satisfactory coal clearance system, although it was noted that the
development process did not become haulage constrained until the face was 180 - 200m from boot end.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M026MINE RESPONSES
2 - low.System is labour intensive due to extent of mine workings.
1 - very low.Typically 40 - 50 hours for a 125m extension.
2 - low.Maintenance scheduled D/S Tuesdays and Fridays.
2 - low.Aged infrastructure, 15kms of conveyor in system.
Longwall production rate derated from 1600tph to 700 tph due to conveyor capacity and reliability issues.
Additional units, adoption of 7 day operations.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M026MINE RESPONSES
Better understanding of delays and improved measuring of KPIs and process management.
Intend to get back to the basics, map processes, resource units then make capital commitment depending upon
proper system analysis.Noted that should be getting 6,000 - 8,000m/CM/annum
and currently getting 3,500m/CM/annum.Aim to get down to an average 2.5 operating units in lieu of
current 4 units.
Roof/rib bolter automation.Self drilling bolts with single pass operation.
Equipment to get panel moves down to a maximum duration of say 12 hours eg; extensible conveyors.
Monorail mounted services.
As above. Intend to trial and compare dual CM operation with single crew (super unit) with current dual CM operation and dual crews in 2 entry gateroad development, and with properly
configured integrated cutting and bolting ABM20.
Roof and rib bolting.Coal clearance.
Panel moves and services extensions.Cable handling systems
1- Roof and rib bolting.2 - Coal clearance.3 - Panel advances.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M026MINE RESPONSES
Modularised continuous mining system ie; TBM, driving a single wide roadway which is partitioned (for ventilation) as
mined.Integrated, continuous cutting, bolting and coal haulage,
incorporating automated bolting system.Potential application of tunnelling and highwall mining
technologies.
Lack of OEM support of step change initiatives, ie; OEMs only want to pursue slow, incremental change.
Financial commitment required to pursue step change initiatives.
Previous history of failed improvement initiatives will deter investment and commitment.
Business risk, ie; pit room constraints and longwall continuity.
Technical design barriers.Legislative barriers.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M026MINE RESPONSES
Automation and robotics.Light weight materials eg; aluminium.
Maintenance systems, eg; aircraft technology and systems.
Modularisation and standardisation of components, motors, pumps, etc.
Integrated, continuous cutting, supporting and coal clearance system.
Gas drainage and ventilation - managing increased gas emissions.
Joy Sumps Shearer.FCT.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M026MINE RESPONSES
Joy Sumps Shearer - disaster, lack of OEM support.FCT - unsuccessful.
Joy Sumps Shearer - good concept however needs to be fully trialed and commissioned before incorporating in a
panel development system. Don't introduce new technology into critical path
development panels.FCT - better suspension system and conveyor belt
required (fell down, broke conveyor belt).
3 - very interested in industry based incremental change initiatives.
Very interested however struggling to get the basics right. In short term (0 - 2 years) more likely to only pursue
roadway development initiatives relevant to the mine (2).
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M026MINE RESPONSES
TBM - 2 years time.
Yes, until asked to contribute $.
Need to establish a roadway development "body of knowledge" and forums for interchange of ideas.
Yes.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?3 Seam Thickness?4 Roadway height as mined - Mains?
5 Roadway height as mined - Panels?
6 Roadway width as mined - Mains?7 Roadway width as mined - Panels?8 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Mains?
9 Pillar dimensions (centres) - Panels?
10 Number of development units - Mains?
11 Number of development units - Panels?
12 Normal crew manning - Mains?
13 Normal crew manning - Panels?
14 CM type - Mains?
15 CM type - Panels?
16 Roof bolting system - Mains?
17 Roof bolting system - Panels?
18 Coal clearance system - Mains?
M0275.0m
3.4m, with 3.6m return roadways.
3.4m, with 3.6m return roadways.
5.2m 4.9m transport, 5.2m conveyor roadways
35m X 100m
40m X 115m
1
12CM super unit in 2 entry gateroad.
7Deputy, 4 operators, 1 mechanical and 1 electrical trades.
Contract mining unit, 6 day roster.
12Deputy, 9 operators, 1 mechanical and 1 electrical trades.
Joy 12CM15 (5.2m widehead, 3.8m high cutting range)
2 X ABM20.1 X 4.9m widehead with 3m high cutting range (note: second pass required to mine 3.4m high gateroad).
1 X 5.2m widehead with 3.6m high cutting range2 Hydramatic Series 4000 roof bolting rigs and 2 rib bolting
rigs.
4 Hydramatic Series 4000 roof bolting rigs and 2 rib bolting rigs.
2 X Joy 15SC and breaker feeder.1600mm Mains conveyor.
MINE RESPONSES
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?19 Coal clearance system - Panels?
20 Material supply system - Mains?
21 Material supply system - Panels?
22 Working arrangements:Days/week?
Shift duration?
Roster system?
23 Mine challenges:Depth?Seam grade?
In situ and residual gas levels?
Ventilation?
Stress levels and regime?
Labour availability and turnover, industrial, etc?
M027MINE RESPONSES
1 X Joy 15SC per continuous miner discharging onto breaker feeder and 1400mm panel conveyor.
Cassette pods, changed out daily on evening shift maintenance window.
Mesh supplied separately to face.
Cassette pods, changed out daily on evening shift maintenance window.
Mesh supplied separately to face.
7 days per week
8 hours 40 minutes
4 shifts per day Monday to Friday with 3.5 hour maintenance window on E/S.
3 shifts per day Friday to Sunday, with maintenance on Fridays.
Contract development 3 X 9.5 hour shifts Monday to Thursday and 2 X 12 hour shifts Friday to Sunday.
180m to 230mGenerally 1:30
3m3/tonne in situ
16m3/s auxiliary fans, 185m3/s main mine fan
No problems experienced due to stress levels.
5% labour turnover.Average age 48 years.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?
Mine life cycle?
24 What other factors may differentiate the mine from other similar mines?
25 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Mains development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
26 Please specify the typical primary support measures installed in Panel development (ie; number, length, and density of roof bolts, rib bolts, and roof tendons), and the type, sizing and extent of roof and rib meshing and/or straps.
27 Please specify any secondary support measures normally installed in Mains development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
M027MINE RESPONSES
34 year old, 15 years remaining.
Sandstone channels over current longwall blocks combined with thick seam to create a windblast potential.
Width of longwall blocks limited to control risk.In current mining area mine design requires all gateroads
to be driven through 15m fault system immediately adjacent to Mains - creates significant issue for gateroad
development.
6 X 2100mm roof bolts/metre with full mesh (1.1m X 4.8m mesh modules).
2 X 6m X 21mm super strands per 2m.2 X 1200mm plastic rib bolts/metre/rib spot bolted with a
plate.
6 X 2100mm roof bolts/metre with 4.6m W straps (faulted area meshed with 1.1m X 4.8m mesh modules).
2 X 6m X 21mm super strands per 2m where required.2 X 1200mm plastic rib bolts/metre/rib spot bolted with a
plate.
2 X 6m X 21mm super strands per 2m.8m extos and clockets in selected intersections.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?28 Please specify any secondary support
measures normally installed in Panel development (ie; number, density, type and sizing), and the typical time lag between primary and secondary support installation.
29 How would you describe the typical roof conditions and support measures installed at the mine?
30 How would you describe the typical rib conditions and support measures at the mine?
31 How would you describe the typical floor conditions experienced at the mine?
32 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 1994/95?
33 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 1994/95?
34 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
35 What was the typical development rate in 1995 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
36 How many kilometres of roadway development were completed in 2004/05?
37 How many tonnes were mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2004/05?
38 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
M027MINE RESPONSES
2 X 6m X 21mm super strands per 2m - approximately 50% of roadways require tendon support.
1 - 3, difficult to good.Mostly difficult to poor.
2 - 3, poor to good.
3 - good.
17.5kms.
1.71Mt
100m/week with 1 CM.
300m/week for 3 CMs (100m/week/CM).
10.14kms (plus stonework through 15m fault).
3.1Mt.
125m/week.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?39 Current development rate 2005 (m/week/CM) -
Panels?
40 How many kilometres of roadway development are projected to be mined in 2014/15?
41 How many tonnes are projected to be mined by longwall and/or pillar extraction in 2014/15?
42 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Mains?
43 Projected development rate 2015 (m/week/CM) - Panels?
44 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal cutting phase of the roadway development process?
45 How would you describe the effectiveness of face roof bolting equipment and systems typically utilised at the mine?
46 How would you describe the effectiveness of the coal clearance system from the face to the conveyor?
M027MINE RESPONSES
185m/week - 2CM super unit.Target 3.1MPOH, achieve 2.7MPOH at best.
(Note: A/S required to complete second pass floor brushing in one roadway where CM has insufficient cutting height for
3.4m roadway).
11kms
3.5Mt
120m/week.
300m/week - 2CM super unit
2 - low.Age of equipment results in low engineering availability.
Limited height range.People issues.
2 - 3, poor to good.Better designed equipment available, poor ergonomically,
bolting rigs unreliable, high downtime.
3 - good.KB breaker feeder has limited capacity and is of poor
design.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?47 How would you describe the effectiveness of the
materials supply and distribution (logistics) system utilised to service roadway development units?
48 How would you describe the effectiveness of panel conveyor and services extensions and practices?
49 How would you describe maintenance effectiveness as it is realised on roadway development equipment?
50 How would you describe the capacity and the effectiveness of the mine's overall coal clearance system?
51 What factors contributed to the reported increase in annual development over the past decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
52 What factors contributed to the improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Mains?
M027MINE RESPONSES
2 - low.Drift access limited to 1 load per trip, 11kms from drift
bottom to panels - major issue.
2 - low.1600mm floor mounted structure.
Target 3 shifts to complete 2 heading super unit advance however typically 5 shifts
3 - good.27 cutting shifts plus 3 maintenance shifts per week for
super unit, plus weekend maintenance if required.
3 - good.11kms of underground trunk conveyors feeding into 2,000
tonne capacity surface bin, with 4km overland haul to CPP.
Cutting out roof to 3.4m height to remove clay band which would otherwise effect gateroad roof control during longwall extraction - what's best for the longwall.
Cutting higher roof section (3.4m) allowed better bolting rigs to be utilised.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?53 What factors contributed to the improvement in
development productivity (m/week) over the past decade - Panels?
54 What factors are likely to contribute to the reported increase in annual development over the next decade (eg; additional units, additional shifts or days worked, increased development productivity)?
55 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Mains?
56 What factors are likely to contribute to the projected improvement in development productivity (m/week) over the next decade - Panels?
57 If you were able to improve the continuous miner cutting rate by a factor of 2 - 3 what other elements of the roadway development process would then limit the overall panel advance rate? - please identify and illustrate.
58 Please rank these limiting factors in order of their perceived impact upon panel advance rates (from highest to least adverse impact).
M027MINE RESPONSES
Cutting higher roof section (3.4m) allowed better bolting rigs to be utilised.
Introduction of short interval process control.
Delivery of new ABM25 scheduled for early 2006, with improved bolting set up and improved ergonomics.
Introduction of new roster system.Focus on manual handling.
Continuance of contract Mains development on 6 day roster.
Better mining conditions.Process control.
Sequence move improvements.Improvement to front line supervision and people.
Better mining conditions.Process control.
Sequence move improvements.Integrated cut and bolt with ABM25.
Improvement to front line supervision and people.
Materials supply and logistics.Panel advances.
Support constraints.SC capacity (coal clearance).
Engineering availability of equipment.People.
1 - People.2 - Support installation.
3 - Materials supply.4 - Engineering availability.
Lot more flexibility with 12CM design as compared to ABM20 design which can only cut out in 1.1m or 0.8m
increments, depending upon machine.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?59 If you were able to specify, design, manufacture,
commission and successfully operate a new generation roadway development system, what would the system consist of? - please identify and illustrate.
60 If you were able to specify, design and manufacture a new generation roadway development system, what barriers would need to be addressed in order to successfully commission and operate the new system? - please identify and illustrate.
M027MINE RESPONSES
Super unit set up, as per Beltana, with scrubber miners able to cut out 6 - 10m in good conditions, with 2 SC
servicing the miner while cutting, with bolting of second roadway being done in parallel.
Support conditions limiting application of ideal system.Budgets and machine design and configuration.
People motivation.Departmental approval processes.
Role, authority and power of inspectorate.Age of workforce.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?61 What "new technology" or "new to the mining
industry technology" needs to be developed and/or applied in order to allow you to successfully demonstrate the new generation roadway development system? - please identify and illustrate.
65 In regards to roadway development, please list and prioritise the 3 most critical issues for research and development over the next 5 -10 years.
66 What involvement have you had with earlier roadway development improvement initiatives and/or research and development?
M027MINE RESPONSES
What happened to the Joy Sumps Shearer? - greatest concept yet developed.
TBMs that can turn around corners.Or alternatively, augering systems for completing
interconnecting roadways.
Improved bolting rigs.Improving machine availability.
Improving machine ergonomics to address issues associated with ageing workforce.
Self drilling roof bolt.
Introduction of development team review of three shift representatives.
Design of new bolting arrangements on ABM25.Introduction of process control.
Bridge conveyors.Introduction of place change mining.
Una haulers.Surge cars and 14BU loaders
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?67 How would you describe those initiatives in
respect to their success or otherwise?
68 What learning was gained from these improvement initiatives in respect to issues or matters that we need to either further address, avoid, or capitalise upon?
69 What level of interest and support is there at the mine to participate in selected research and development over the next 5 -10 years into roadway development?
M027MINE RESPONSES
First stages of development team review, process control, and new bolting arrangements showing improvements.
Bridge conveyors - in right conditions have huge potential, but need hard floor.
Una haulers - similarly need hard floor.Place change mining - mocked up on surface to assess
how system works and make refinements.14BU loaders - good, clean floor achieved.
People key to success.Supervisor ability and willingness is crucial.
Must reduce manual handling with ageing workforce.
3 - very interested in industry based incremental change initiatives.
ACARP PROJECT C15005 AUSTRALIAN ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT STATUS
APPENDIX III - MINE SITE RESPONSES NO FACTOR1 Mine Name?70 What specific research and development
initiatives into roadway development would the mine be interested in pursuing on an industry basis?
71 Would the mine be interested in collaborating with other mines to jointly develop and trial integrated mining systems, or parts thereof?
72 What other matters are there that the mine would like to bring to the attention of the ACARP Underground Technical Committee and Roadway Development Task Group?
A Does mine require a copy of the study report?
M027MINE RESPONSES
Machine ergonomics.Bolting rig improvements.
Alternative secondary support systems and equipment.
Would consider if advantageous.
Facilitate industry approach to NSW DPINR to address deficiencies in approval process and to limit the role,
authority, and power of the Inspectorate.
Yes