Academic Senate

23
Academic Senate Student Learning Outcomes Why The Controversy? Presentation to the MPC Board of Trustees November 25, 2008

description

Academic Senate. Student Learning Outcomes Why The Controversy?. Presentation to the MPC Board of Trustees November 25, 2008. Academic Senate. First Things First What are SLOs?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Academic Senate

Page 1: Academic Senate

Academic Senate

Student Learning Outcomes

Why The Controversy?

Presentation to the MPC Board of TrusteesNovember 25, 2008

Page 2: Academic Senate

Academic Senate

First Things First

What are SLOs?

ACCJC: Knowledge, skills, abilities, and attitudes that a student has attained at the end (or as a result) of his or her engagement in a particular set of collegiate experiences.

MPC: An SLO is a measurable or evaluable description of what students are expected to be able to “do” as they successfully complete a course. The word “do,” in this context, could mean “perform,” “paint,” “analyze,” “demonstrate,” “synthesize,” “use the scientific method,” or any number of verbs appropriate for a particular course.

But there’s more…..

Page 3: Academic Senate

Academic Senate

First Things First

What is the SLO-Assessment Model?

Shifts the focus to student learning Integrates the assessment results into all aspects of

institutional planning and resource allocation

Expectations of student learning…..Assessment…..

Analysis…..Dialog…..

Planning

Page 4: Academic Senate

Academic SenateSLOs: So Why the Controversy?

Evaluation

Work Load

Standardization/Academic Freedom

Student Indoctrination?

Bureaucratic waste of time becauseWe already do itDoesn’t value the individuality of studentsDoesn’t value the complexity of teaching and learningCan’t possibly be of any valueIt’s a fad…Nobody caresWe should spend our time teaching

Not suggesting these objections are valid, or that we all agree. Just that they exist.

Page 5: Academic Senate

Academic Senate

Evaluation From the ACCJC Standards, in the HR section:

“Faculty and others directly responsible for student progress toward achieving stated student learning outcomes have, as a component of their evaluation, effectiveness in producing those learning outcomes.”

Faculty evaluation is negotiable issue, not a directive of an accrediting agency.

Could lead to low-level learning….Can you spell E-a-r-t-h?

SLO Controversy

CTA parent investigating legal action.

Page 6: Academic Senate

Academic Senate

Work Load

Developing SLOs…..evaluating them…..analyzing the results.. …talking about them……planning what to do next….

How much time will this take?

SLO Controversy

A lot, to do it well.

All take time.

It’s why we’re all so busy.

Page 7: Academic Senate

Academic Senate

Work Load

An un-negotiatedaddition to our workload.

SLO Controversy

An over-riding framework for

what we already do as faculty.

Developing SLOs…..evaluating them…..analyzing the results.. …talking about them……planning what to do next….

Page 8: Academic Senate

Academic Senate

Standardization/Academic Freedom

Assessment and Dialog:Where should it lead us?......What should we agree on?

-Student Expectations? -Tests?-Assessment Tools? -Assignments?-Identical Syllabi -Daily lectures?

Students’ access to a diversity of views and opinions.

This diversity is intellectual pluralism, the marketplace of ideas, the foundation of our Academic Freedom policy.

SLO Controversy

Or a framework for ensuring consistency between courses?

Page 9: Academic Senate

Academic Senate

Standardization/Academic Freedom

Academic Freedom Intellectual Pluralism

SLO Controversy

Consistencybetween sections,

alignment of curriculum

How should assessment and dialog change our teaching?

Page 10: Academic Senate

Academic Senate

Standardization/Academic Freedom

SLO Controversy

What are SLOs again?

This isNo Child Left Behind

Means to defend againstNo Child Left Behind

CTA State Leadership

State Academic Senate

Lower academic stdsCan you spell E-A-R-T-H?

Faculty’s opportunity to set academic stds

Page 11: Academic Senate

Academic Senate

Student Indoctrination

“The evidence the institution presents should also be about student learning outcomes (mastery of the knowledge, skills, abilities, competencies, attitudes, beliefs, opinions, and values at the course, program, and degree levels in the context of each college’s mission and population)…” [ACCJC Guide to Evaluating Institutions, page 11; emphasis mine]

This is more like brainwashing than education.

Relates to Students’ Academic Freedom

SLO Controversy

Or is it all up to us to define?

Page 12: Academic Senate

Academic Senate

“ mastery of the knowledge, skills, abilities, competencies, attitudes, beliefs, opinions, and values at the course, program, and degree levels in the context of each college’s mission and population…” [ACCJC Guide to Evaluating Institutions, page 11; emphasis mine]

SLO Controversy

Which beliefs, values, or opinions?……..Appropriate?

Page 13: Academic Senate

Academic Senate

“ mastery of the knowledge, skills, abilities, competencies, attitudes, beliefs, opinions, and values at the course, program, and degree levels in the context of each college’s mission and population…” [ACCJC Guide to Evaluating Institutions, page 11; emphasis mine]

SLO Controversy

Which beliefs, values, or opinions?……..Appropriate?

Skills, abilities, and competencies are

up to us

Page 14: Academic Senate

Academic Senate

Bureaucratic Waste of Time

Doesn’t value the individuality of students.Students learn differently Have chaotic livesRespond/learn in many different ways to our coursesNot always captured in pithy statements

SLO Controversy

Doesn’t value the complexity of topics and teaching.SLOs become overly vague generalizations of what we expect

“Use the Scientific Method to investigate the natural world.”In what context?At what complexity?

Page 15: Academic Senate

Academic Senate

Bureaucratic Waste of Time

Can’t possibly be of any valueIt’s a fad…..Nobody cares about themWe should spend our time teachingWhat is it we shouldn’t do, to complete these SLO tasks?

SLO Controversy

We already do this.Course Outline of Record

State Mandated through Title 5Objectives (=ACCJC SLOs)Assessment Methods

Informally with Colleagues

Page 16: Academic Senate

Academic Senate

We already do this

SLO Controversy

Extra work better directed

elsewhere

Why don’t we want this again?

Bureaucratic Waste of Time

Page 17: Academic Senate

Academic SenateSLOs Controversy

Standardization/Academic FreedomEvaluationWork LoadStudent Indoctrination?Bureaucratic waste of time

Do ALL faculty worry about these things?

But we also believe in accreditation.

YES!YES!

Page 18: Academic Senate

Academic SenateSLO Controversy

No clarity from ACCJC

Why has there been such controversy?

Lack of experienced leadership at MPC

No agreement on what SLOs represent or should be used for.

Page 19: Academic Senate

Academic SenateSLO Controversy

No agreement on what SLOs are.

NCLB Prevent NCLB

More work

What we do now

Standardization Consistency

Page 20: Academic Senate

Academic SenateSLO Controversy

No clarity from ACCJC

A recognition of what it means to be an ethical human

being and effective citizen….”

“General education has comprehensive learning outcomes ……including the following:

Page 21: Academic Senate

Academic SenateSLO Controversy

No clarity from ACCJC

A recognition of what it means to be an ethical human

being and effective citizen….”

“General education has comprehensive learning outcomes ……including the following:

“The willingness to assume civic, political, and social responsibilities locally, nationally, and globally.”

Page 22: Academic Senate

Academic SenateSLO Controversy

Lack of experienced leadership at MPC

SLOs are new; no agreement on what they represent

SLOs are a multi-faceted and complicated

Difficult to lead without common definitions

Page 23: Academic Senate

Academic Senate

So what are SLOs?

On behalf of the Academic Senate, Thank you.