Academic Senate Spring 2010 Flex Days. Academic Senate Thank You Senate Flex Day Scheduling...
-
Upload
berniece-james -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Academic Senate Spring 2010 Flex Days. Academic Senate Thank You Senate Flex Day Scheduling...
Academic Senate
Spring 2010
Flex Days
Academic Senate
Thank You
Senate Flex Day Scheduling Committee
Laura LoopHeather Faust
Debbie AnthonyChris Calima
Laura Buchholtz
Academic Senate
Academic Senate
Academic Senate
Academic Senate
Accreditation Self Study Finished
Looks beautifulJeanette Haxton/Rich Montori
Hot links courtesy of Kim Panis
Matches quality on the inside
Too many people to thank
Academic Senate
Dr. Francisco RodriguezSuperintendent/PresidentMira Costa College
Mr. Michael GuerraVP, Admin ServicesFresno City College
Mr. J. Brian HaleyDean, Learning ResourcesSierra College
Ms. Mary HalvorsonVP, Academic AffairsSantiago Canyon College
Dr. Richard Robertson (Assistant)VP, Student ServicesMira Costa College
Dr. Frederick TrappFormer Dean, Research/Academic ServicesLong Beach City College
Dr. Deborah TravisPresidentConsumnes River College
Dr. Celina Sau Lin IngProfessor, Computer Information ScienceSacramento City College
Ms. Nancy SilvaProfessor, Theatre ArtsAmerican River College
Mr. Michael Spina Education Technology SpecialistLake Tahoe Community College
Mr. Brian ThiebauxProfessor, English, Business and Inst. ResearchPalo Verde College
Mr. Mario Tejada, Jr.Dept Chair, Computer Information SystemsDiablo Valley College
Accreditation Visiting TeamMarch 8-11, 2010
Academic SenateMy Personal Accreditation Journey
-Wrote MPC standard “Improving Institutional Effectiveness”
-Participated as a team member at Las Positas
-Read and commented on all aspects of MPC self study
-Trainings, meetings, reviews, ad nauseum
Academic SenateMy Personal Accreditation Journey
-I believe in the basic process: Peer Review
-Accreditation Team at Las Positas wasFairOpen mindedCognizant of each standardNot mired in minutiaListened to each other
Diversity of opinion and perspective (hopefully) leads to a fair and balanced report
Academic SenateMy Personal Accreditation Journey
-I believe in the fundamental themes of the standards:
Goal Setting, Planning Evaluation, Dialog, Improvement, Repeat
Student learning is at the heart of all planning and decisions
Clarity of purpose, process, and goals characterize successful organizations
-At MPC, these fundamental themes translate into:
Institutional GoalsComponent GoalsPlethora of plansProgram ReviewThe Planning and Resource Allocation ProcessThe SLO Framework
Academic SenateMy Personal Accreditation Journey
-I recognize the ACCJC has some problems
Standards are repetitive, confusingSometimes compliance rather than improvement approachResistant to honest, constructive, critiqueTrainings are inadequate, sometimes even intimidating
Academic SenateMy Personal Accreditation Journey
-I believe MPC will do well overall
Based on the strength of ourMPC Planning and Resource Allocation ProcessProgram Review ProcessesClarity of governance processes
Board policiesAdministrative policiesGovernance committees
Expect some recommendations—perhaps on SLOs
Academic SenateMy Personal Accreditation Journey
Goals/PlanningProgramReview
Review/Evaluation
ResourceAllocation
SLOs
Academic Senate
Academic SenateWhat I’ve Learned about SLOs
-SLOs mean different things to different people
DataAssessment
Public
Dialog
Grades
StandardizationEvaluation
QuantitativeCourse, Program, Institution
Academic SenateWhat I’ve Learned about SLOs
-Presented Spring 2008 Flex days-Got many things right, and a few things wrong
Academic SenateWhat I’ve Learned about SLOs
-Things we got right
There are problems with the SLO model (p. 5)oFear of standardizationoPossibility of lowering standardsoPossible loss of subtlety and complexity of subject matteroPossibility of evaluations based on student performance
“SLOs can provide a formal framework for faculty to converse, as professionals, about teaching, learning, pedagogy, and curricula” (p. 10)
Definition: “what students are expected to be able to “do” as they successfully complete a course.” (p. 10)
“Most important thing to remember: If we don’t write SLOs for our courses and programs, somebody else…will. And that would be everybody’s worst nightmare.” (p. 17)
Academic SenateWhat I’ve Learned about SLOs
-One thing we got wrong
That there is a big difference between SLOs and objectives
We now believe the only difference is one of number and scopeoObjectives: many and narrow scope, culminate in SLOsoSLOs: few and broader scope, derived from objectivesoBoth should be written in terms what students should be able to “do” by the end of the course
For the purposes of the MPC SLO framework, engage in dialog about either objectives or SLOs, whatever you think would be a benefit to your students
Academic SenateWhat I’ve Learned about SLOs
-General Education Outcomes Examples:
English Compositionform a provable thesis, develop it through factual research, distinguish between fact and opinion, and make effective rhetorical choices in relation to audience and purpose.
Communication and Analytical Thinkinganalyze and evaluate complex issues or problems, draw reasoned conclusions and/or generate solutions, and effectively communicate their results.
Humanities:analyze and interpret human thought, achievement, and expression relevant to such branches of knowledge as philosophy, literature, and/or the fine and performing arts, and to communicate the results.
Social Sciences: critically examine and comprehend human nature and behavior, social traditions, and institutions.
Upon successful completion of this area, students will have demonstrated an ability to….
Academic SenateWhat I’ve Learned about SLOs
-The SLO framework “lives” in the annual update portion of program review:
Available on the Academic Senate website.
Academic SenateWhat I’ve Learned about SLOs
-I believe the SLO framework/dialog is useful to:
Establish consistent expectations across multiple sections
Establish a progression of skills across a sequence of courses
Discover where improvements are needed
Plan improvements
Provide rationale for resource allocation requests
Establish a vision for your program
Evaluate the effectiveness of attaining the vision for your program
Four examples to follow
I believe we already do most of these things.
SLO Dialog in Earth Sciences
Purpose:
Demonstrate how Earth Sciences engages in the SLO framework
SLO Dialog in Earth Sciences
Purpose:
Demonstrate how Earth Sciences engages in the SLO framework
Describe how dialog leads to improvement efforts
SLO Dialog in Earth Sciences
Purpose:
Demonstrate how Earth Sciences engages in the SLO framework
Describe how dialog leads to improvement efforts
Dialog is the essential component of the SLO Process
Geology SLOs
1. Explain Earth features in terms of surficial processes, tectonics, and human influence. 2. Use observations of outcrops and/or landscape morphology to interpret basic geologic history and processes 3. (GEO) Use the scientific method to investigate phenomena in the natural world and use concepts, experiments, and/or theory to explain them.
Today’s Focus
SLO: Use observations of outcrops and/or landscape morphology to interpret basic geologic history and processes
How do we evaluate?Students must: -Observe a local geologic outcrop/landscape -Interpret the basic events that formed it -Present posters to class
Why did we choose this project?-Incorporates course objectives-Incorporates GEO -MPC students have completed this assignment since the 90’s.
SLO: Use observations of outcrops and/or landscape morphology to interpret basic geologic history and processes
Have we been satisfied with the students’ achievement of this outcome?
Not Entirely
SLO: Use observations of outcrops and/or landscape morphology to interpret basic geologic history and processes
Have we been satisfied with the students’ achievement of this outcome?
Not Entirely
Big Question: How do we improve student learning?
Why not? -- Dialog 1. Geologic content2. Critical Thinking – Process of Scientific Inquiry3. Basic skills
Give Students More Practice
Developed a mid-semester project.
Big Question: How do we improve student learning?
Students receive more time in the field….
A mid-semester project.
A mid-semester project.
Collaboration with English and Study Skills Center to improve quality of written communication.
…and more writing practice
-Additional practice on more field trips.
-Collaboration with the Math Learning Center to help with basic skills.
These sidewalks were poured straight!
SLO: Use observations of outcrops and/or landscape morphology to interpret basic geologic history and process
Student posters used to evaluate the SLO.It is the student attainment of this SLO that we wanted to
improve.
Do we have quantitative results? No.
Do we have qualitative results? Yes.
We emphasize DIALOG, which leads to……
Greater clarity of what we expect from students (SLOs)
Pedagogical adjustments
Improved evaluation techniques
Improvement of student attainment of SLOs (i.e., student learning)
This approach is one way to engage in the SLO framework at MPC
Discussion/Dialog/Reflection
Ideas for Improvement
Action
SLO Process
Dialog leads to improved student learning