Academic Review Committee Meeting · 2014-07-17 · Academic Review Committee Meeting. East...

Academic Review Committee Meeting

.

East Tennessee State University, June 4, 2014

Framework

Flow– Student demand and yield– Instructional activity– Retention and degree production– Revenue and expenses

rpkGROUP. All rights reserved.

Revenue and expenses

Group departments/programs into categories Consider investment/reallocation opportunities

Tapping into Student Demand Which programs/departments house most of the

institution’s students?

How well am I responding to market demand?– Current academic portfolio– Untapped opportunities


Untapped opportunities

What is my student yield, particularly within high demand programs/departments?

Demand in the Market

In order to drive revenue from tuition and fees, we must understand student demand in the market.

The following analysis assesses the highest level of student interest – at the time of application.


CSCICOMM

KLSSCHEMPHYTBISCCUAICJCRCDSTPSYCPHYSTECG

MGMKALSC

NURS

Number of prospective undergraduate students who applied, by department

Total applications by department, median 187


- 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800

ACCTPHAHCOHEENVHHSMPEFUSGEOSAPSTCSHS

MATHSOAATLRN

MUSCPSCI

ARTAHIST

SOWKHSCILILA

48% of applicants originate from the top 6departments


MGMK

ALSC

NURS

Number of prospective undergraduate students who applied, by department


- 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800

PSYC

PHYS

TECG

ACCTBISCCSCIPSYCTLRNCSHSKLSSELPA

SOWKPHYT

MGMKCUAIASLP

NURGHSCI

Number of prospective graduate students who applied, by department



- 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

APSTGRASENVHSOAAGEOSCOM…

HSMPARTACOHE

HISTMATH

LILATECGPSCICJCR

CHEMCDSTALSCBIEP

ACCT

52% of applicants originate from the top 6 departments

CUAI

ASLP

NURG


Median = 68


- 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

SOWK

PHYT

MGMK

Demand in the Market

Student demand can also be measured at the point of acceptance and attendance.

By tracking student demand, we can determine how well we are capturing the market that is already aware of the University, and the programs and majors


aware of the University, and the programs and majors that are attracting student attention.

Student Yield

Student yield indicates what percentage of students who apply actually end up attending the University.

As with demand, yield can be measured at various milestones in the enrollment process

Following tables show percentages of students who


Following tables show percentages of students who move on to the next stage

LILASOAATECGPSYCARTAGEOS

MGMKMATH

APSTCSCI

CSHSCUAIHIST

CDSTSOWKPHAHHSMP

Percentage of prospective undergraduate students who applied that were accepted

Median 55.2%

Average for departments above the median = 60.7%

Most departments fall within 10% points above or below median


0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

EFUSACCT

MUSCPSCI

NURSPHYTTLRNHSCIPHYSBISCCJCRKLSSALSC

CHEMCOMM

COHEENVH

LILA

Average for departments below the median = 49.9%

KLSSTECGCDSTPSYCARTAPHAH

CSCIENVHMATH

MGMKLILAHIST

SOWKHSMPCHEM

CUAIPHYS

Percentage of prospective undergraduate students who applied that then enrolled

Median = 47%



0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

EFUSTLRNACCTCSHSNURSAPSTPSCIBISC

COHESOAAMUSCGEOSPHYTHSCICJCR

COMMALSCKLSS


COMMCSCI

PSYCHSCI

TECGCUAIAPSTKLSS

MUSCHISTPSCI

PHYSTLRNPHYTCOHEACCT

Percentage of prospective undergraduate students who were accepted that enrolled


High capture rate at the department level


0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

PHAHHSMPCDSTCSHSNURSENVHSOAA

SOWKEFUS

MATHARTABISC

GEOSLILA

CHEMALSC

MGMKCJCR

Median = 86.6%Average for departments

below the median = 82.2%

Bring together demand and yield into quadrants Focus on departments with high demand

Sample Analysis: Demand/Yield


High # Prospects/Low Yield High # Prospects/High YieldHigh1579

CHEMCHEM

CSCICSCI

CDSTCDSTCUAICUAI

KLSSKLSS

ALSCALSC

BISCBISC CJCRCJCR

ElevateElevate YieldYield

MaximizeMaximize

LILALILA

MGMKMGMK

PHYSPHYSPSYCHPSYCH

TELGTELG

COMMCOMMHSCIHSCI

NURSNURS

PHYTPHYT

Median #Applicants 187


Low # Prospects/Low Yield Low # Prospects/High Yield

ARTAARTA

Low4PHAHPHAH ENVHENVH

HISTHIST SOWKSOWK

ACCTACCT COHECOHE

APSTAPSTCSHSCSHS

MUSCMUSC

GEOSGEOSHSMPHSMP

MATHMATH

PSCIPSCI

SOAASOAATLRNTLRN

Median Yield47%

High89%

EFUSEFUS

What are opportunities to build on departments with high demand but low yield?

Driving Demand/Yield


ALSCBIEP

ACCTBISCCSCI

PSYCTLRNCSHSKLSSELPA

SOWKPHYT

MGMKCUAIASLP

NURGHSCI


Median = 68


- 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

APSTGRASENVHSOAAGEOS

COMMHSMPARTACOHE

HISTMATH

LILATECGPSCICJCR

CHEMCDST

CHEM

COMM

ELPA

TECG

CDST

KLSS

CJCR

LILA

APST

Percentage of prospective graduate students who applied that were accepted

Median = 45.8



0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

PSYC

ARTA

ALSC

BISC

CSHS

PSCI

GRAS

MGMK

CHEM


NURGAPSTHISTLILA

GEOSCUAICDSTELPA

COMMHSMPALSCPHYTGRASPSYC

SOAAHSCI

Percentage of prospective graduate students who were accepted that enrolled

Average for departments above the median = 83%


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

CHEMTECGASLPARTA

MATHCSCIBIEPBISC

COHEPSCI

ENVHMGMK

KLSSCJCRTLRNACCT

SOWKCSHS

Median = 72.3%


BIEPSOWK

KLSSCJCRACCTGRASELPA

COMMTLRNCUAICDSTCOHEHSMP

LILAHIST

SOAAHSCI

Percentage of prospective graduate students who applied that then enrolled

Median =



0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ASLPPSYCARTA

CHEMPHYTCSCIBISC

TECGGEOSALSCPSCI

CSHSNURGENVH

MGMKMATH

APSTBIEP Median =

31.6%


High # Prospects/Low Yield High # Prospects/High Yield

BISCBISC

High595

TRLNTRLN

CSHSCSHS

MGMKMGMKASLPASLP

ALSCALSCCDSTCDST

CUAICUAI

KLSSKLSS

ElevateElevate YieldYield

MaximizeMaximize

SOWKSOWK

BIEPBIEP

ELPAELPA

ACCTACCT

NURGNURG

CSCICSCI

Median #Applicants 68

PHYTPHYT

PSYCPSYC


Low # Prospects/Low Yield Low # Prospects/High Yield

Median Yield32%

Low10

HISTHISTCOHECOHE

ENVHENVH

CJCRCJCR

High92%

ARTAARTA

CHEMCHEM

GEOSGEOS

COMMCOMM HSMPHSMP

APSTAPSTGRASGRAS

PSCIPSCITECGTECG

MATHMATH

Low10%

SOAASOAA

LILALILA

Important to understand enrollment and concentration in specific programs/ departments

Which departments have the most credit hours being taken by students in the department?

Note that many other departments provide “service

Student credit hours


Note that many other departments provide “service credits”

Sociology/anthropologySociology/anthropology

Leisure/sports sciencesLeisure/sports sciences

Engineering TechEngineering Tech

Allied HealthAllied Health

10806

12251

11354

10373

4%

3%

4%

3%

ARTAARTA

GEOSGEOS PHYSPHYS

TLRNTLRN ACCTACCTAll other departments

Total undergraduate SCH


MathMath

CommunicationsCommunicationsComputer ScienceComputer Science

NursingNursing

Literature/languageLiterature/languageHistoryHistory

Management/MarketingManagement/Marketing

PsychologyPsychology

21366

16738

14377

1879019164

15715

31903

152095%

10%

4%

5%

7%

6% 6%

5%

SOAASOAA

KLSSKLSS


ALSCALSC

10806

12251

11354

10373

4%

3%

4%

3%

ARTAARTA

GEOSGEOS PHYSPHYS



Total Credit Hrs by Department


MathMath


NursingNursing

LILALILAHistoryHistory



21366

16738

14377

1879019164

15715

31903

152095%

10%

4%

5%

7%

6% 6%

5%

SOAASOAA

KLSSKLSS


ALSCALSC

10806

12251

11354

10373

4%

3%

4%

3%

ARTAARTA

GEOSGEOS PHYSPHYS




MathMath


NursingNursing

LILALILAHistoryHistory



21366

16738

14377

1879019164

15715

31903

152095%

10%

4%

5%

7%

6% 6%

5%

Sociology/Sociology/AnthropoloyAnthropoloy

Leisure/Sport SciencesLeisure/Sport Sciences



10806

12251

11354

10373

4%

3%

4%

3%

ARTAARTA

GEOSGEOS PHYSPHYS

TLRNTLRN ACCTACCT


Other 22 departments = 40%

Core8 departments = 33%


MathMath


NursingNursing

Literature/LanguageLiterature/LanguageHistoryHistory



21366

16738

14377

1879019164

15715

31903

152095%

10%

4%

5%

7%

6% 6%

5% Anchor4 departments = 29%

Curriculum/InstructionCurriculum/Instruction

Literature/LanguageLiterature/Language

CommunicationsCommunications

Social WorkSocial Work

4480

5021

4612

3867

4%

3%

4%

4%

ARTAARTA

HISTHIST BISCBISC

TLRNTLRN ACCTACCT



Undergraduate SCH taken by majors in the dept



Leisure/Sports ScienceLeisure/Sports ScienceComputer ScienceComputer Science

ManagementManagement

NursingNursingEngineeringEngineering

Criminal JusticeCriminal Justice


9123

7043

5059

72308882

6212

19065

5573

5%

16%

4%

5%

8%

8% 6%


NursingNursing

Leisure/Sport SciencesLeisure/Sport Sciences

BIEPBIEP

AccountingAccounting

907

1740

1678

902

5%

2%

4%

2%

ARTAARTA

COMMCOMM BISCBISC

MATHMATH CJCRCJCR



Total graduate SCH



Audiology/SpeechAudiology/SpeechSocial WorkSocial Work

Education LeadershipEducation Leadership

Physical TherapyPhysical TherapyCurriculum/InstructionCurriculum/Instruction

CounselingCounseling

Teaching and LearningTeaching and Learning

4055

2426

2015

25123115

2142

4213

2091

6%

11%

5%

6%

11%

8% 7%



Teaching/LearningTeaching/Learning



809

1549

1242

780

5%

2%

4%

2%

ARTAARTA

HISHIS BISCBISC

TLRNTLRN ACCTACCT



Graduate SCH by majors in the dept


Audiology/SpeechAudiology/Speech

Social WorkSocial WorkManagement/MarketingManagement/Marketing


Physical TherapyPhysical TherapyCurriculum/InstructionCurriculum/Instruction

Leisure/Sports SciencesLeisure/Sports Sciences

NursingNursing

3339

2088

1605

24232943

1993

4207

1679

6%

13%

5%

5%

10%

9% 7%


Student outcomes

Retention – in department, and at ETSU Degree production Graduation rates


LILACJCRTECG

COMMKLSS

PHAHCSCI

TLRNSOWKARTA

HSMPEFUSCSHSACCTGEOSAPST

Undergraduate retention in department (fall to fall)

Median = 65.1%



0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

PHYTHSCICUAI

MGMKBISC

COHECDSTALSC

CHEMPHYSENVH

PSCIHIST

SOAAPSYC

MATHNURSMUSC

LILA


KLSSPSCIBISCHSCICUAIARTA

MATHMUSCGEOS

SOWKCSHSACCTTLRNAPST

HSMPEFUS

COHE

Undergraduate retention at ETSU (fall to fall)

Median = 77.3%



0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

CDSTPHYTHISTCJCRPSYCPHYS

PHAHMGMK

TECGALSC

CHEMLILA

COMMENVHSOAANURS

CSCIKLSS


Top 12 departments account for

69% of undergrad degrees

Criminal JusticeCriminal Justice

CommunicationsCommunications


BiologyBiology

81

90

84

81

4%

4%

4%

4%

ARTAARTAHISTHIST LILALILA

SOAASOAAMUSCMUSC PSCIPSCI

EFUSEFUS


Otherdepartments = 31%


ALSCALSC

Leisure/sport sciencesLeisure/sport sciencesEngineering techEngineering tech

CDSTCDST

Nursing Nursing Management/MarketingManagement/Marketing


Curriculum/InstructionCurriculum/Instruction

162

120

96

128159

119

270

96

6%

13%

5%

5%

8%

7% 6%

6% 4 anchordepartments = 33%

LILAALSCPSYCELPA

COMMCOHEARTACSHSKLSSASLPGRASPHYTAPSTGEOSHSCI

Graduate student retention in department (fall to fall)



0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

CDSTCUAICJCRPSCI

HSMPBIEP

MGMKTECGBISC

TLRNCSCI

SOAASOWKENVHCHEM

HISTNURGACCT

MATH

Median = 84.3%


ACCTLILA

ALSCPSYCELPAARTACSHSKLSSASLPGRASCOHE

COMMPHYTAPSTGEOSHSCI

Graduate student retention at ETSU (fall to fall)



0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

CDSTCUAI

HSMPPSCICJCRBIEP

MGMKTECGTLRNCSCI

ENVHSOWKSOAACHEM

HISTNURG

BISCMATH

Median = 86%


Top 12 departments account for

70% of graduate degrees



CrossCross--DisciplinaryDisciplinary

Computer/Info sciencesComputer/Info sciences

19

27

27

19

4%

3%

4%

3%

COMMCOMMHISTHIST LILALILA

ARTARTBISCBISCMUSCMUSC PSCIPSCI

PSYCPSYC


Otherdepartments = 30%



Social workSocial workLeisure/sports scienceLeisure/sports science

ManagementManagement

Curriculum/Instruction Curriculum/Instruction NursingNursing

Audiology/SpeechAudiology/Speech

Physical TherapyPhysical Therapy

74

35

27

4465

32

105

29

5%

15%

4%

4%

10%

9% 6%

5% 4 anchordepartments = 40%

Sample Analysis: Pulling it Together

Quartiles of demand/yield and degree production– Percentage of applicants who enroll– Degrees awarded

Points out areas of investmentWhat is needed to start making decisions?


What is needed to start making decisions?

Demand/yield and degree production – One lens

High demand/yield, high degrees

Medium demand/yield, medium degrees

High demand, but low degrees


Low demand, but high degrees

Low demand/yield, low degrees

Using Data for Decisionmaking

Current data may not be enough to make some decisions, but can be a place to start thinking about what comes next...

Data can point to where more in-depth analysis is needed


Next Steps

Finish up current phase of quantitative analysis Share data with departments and get feedback Qualitative analysis Consideration for a future program-level data capture


future program data capture

Academic Review Committee Meeting · 2014-07-17 · Academic Review Committee Meeting. East...

Documents

Transcript of Academic Review Committee Meeting · 2014-07-17 · Academic Review Committee Meeting. East...