ABSTRAK - sinta.unud.ac.id · PDF file4.3 Hasil Perbandingan Sistem Gugur dengan Sistem GDSS...
-
Upload
vuongthuan -
Category
Documents
-
view
239 -
download
1
Transcript of ABSTRAK - sinta.unud.ac.id · PDF file4.3 Hasil Perbandingan Sistem Gugur dengan Sistem GDSS...
viii
ABSTRAK
Begitu banyaknya penawaran yang masuk dalam E-procurement pekerjaan
konstruksi membuat Kelompok Kerja ULP mengalami kesulitan dalam evaluasi
penawaran untuk menentukan pemenang penyedia pekerjaan konstruksi. Sistem
pendukung keputusan kelompok merupakan suatu sistem yang dapat membantu
Kelompok Kerja ULP Pemerintah Provinsi Bali dalam mengambil keputusan
dengan kemampuan analisa pemilihan penyedia pekerjaan konstruksi dengan
metode kriteria AHP dan Borda. Pokja ULP dapat mengambil keputusan pada
evaluasi penawaran penyedia pekerjaan konstruksi secara obyektif berdasarkan
multi kriteria yang ditetapkan dan meningkatkan kualitas dalam perbaikan proses
pengambilan keputusan kelompok. Kedua metode tersebut digunakan karena
terdapat dua tahap dalam pengambilan keputusan yaitu individual decision dan
group decision. Hasil pengujian sistem menunjukkan bahwa GDSS dapat
diterapkan sebagai sistem pendukung keputusan dalam evaluasi penawaran
penyedia pekerjaan konstruksi dan memutuskan perusahaan yang paling layak
untuk menjadi pemenang.
Kata Kunci : GDSS, AHP, Borda, Evaluasi Penawaran.
ix
ABSTRACT
So many bids in E-procurement of construction work of the Working Group ULP
create difficulties in evaluating the bids to determine the winner of construction
work providers. A group decision support system is a system that can help the
Working Group ULP Bali provincial government in making decisions with the
ability to analyze the construction work provider selection criteria with AHP and
Borda method. WG ULP can take a decision on the bid evaluation provider of
construction work objectively based multi criteria set and improve quality in the
improvement process of group decision-making. Both methods are used because
there are two stages in the decision-making that decision of individual and group
decision. The test results show that the system can be applied GDSS as decision
support systems in the bid evaluation provider of construction work and decided
the company's most worthy to be a winner.
Keywords: GDSS, AHP, Borda, Bid Evaluation.
x
DAFTAR ISI
SAMPUL UTAMA.
SAMPUL KEDUA.
LEMBAR PENGESAHAN..
LEMBAR PANITIA PENGUJI.
SURAT PERNYATAAN BEBAS PLAGIAT
UCAPAN TERIMA KASIH.
ABSTRAK.
ABSTRACT
DAFTAR ISI...................................................................................................
DAFTAR TABEL...........................................................................................
DAFTAR GAMBAR......................................................................................
BAB I PENDAHULUAN..............................................................................
1.1 Latar Belakang..................................................................................
1.2 Rumusan Masalah.............................................................................
1.3 Tujuan Penelitian...............................................................................
1.4 Manfaat Penelitian.............................................................................
1.5 Batasan Penelitian.............................................................................
1.6 Keaslian Penelitian............................................................................
BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA.....................................................................
2.1 State of The Art Review.....................................................................
2.2 Sistem Pendukung Keputusan...........................................................
i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
viii
ix
x
xiv
xv
1
1
9
10
10
11
11
14
14
20
xi
2.2.1 Tujuan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan....................................
2.2.2 Proses Pengambilan Keputusan..............................................
2.3 Group Decision Support System (GDSS)...........................................
2.4 Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)...................................
2.4.1 Penyusunan Hirarki...............................................................
2.4.2 Prinsip Dasar AHP................................................................
2.4.3 Prosedur AHP........................................................................
2.5 Metode Borda.....................................................................................
2.6 Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa.................................................................
2.7 E-Procurement.....................................................................................
2.8 Pekerjaan Konstruksi...........................................................................
2.9 Evaluasi Penawaran.............................................................................
2.9.1 Koreksi Aritmatik...................................................................
2.9.2 Evaluasi Administrasi............................................................
2.9.3 Evaluasi Teknis......................................................................
2.9.4 Evaluasi Harga.......................................................................
2.9.5 Evaluasi Kualifikasi...............................................................
2.10 ULP dan Kelompok Kerja (Pokja).......................................................
BAB III METODE PENELITIAN.................................................................
3.1 Gambaran Umum Sistem.....................................................................
3.2.1 Sistem Existing.......................................................................
3.2.2 Sistem Usulan........................................................................
3.2 Instrumen Penelitian.........................................................................
20
21
22
24
26
27
28
34
34
36
37
37
38
38
39
40
42
42
46
46
46
48
50
xii
3.3 Data dan Teknik Pengumpulan Data..................................................
3.3.1 Data Primer.............................................................................
3.3.2 Data Sekunder.........................................................................
3.4 Analisa Sistem............................................................................
3.4.1 Analisis Masalah.....................................................................
3.4.2 Hirarki Pemilihan Penyedia Pekerjaan Konstruksi.................
3.4.3 Prosedur Sistem......................................................................
3.4.4 Rancangan Sistem GDSS........................................................
3.4.5 Pengujian Sistem...................................................................
3.5 Tempat dan Jadwal Penelitian.............................................................
BAB IV HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN.......................................................
4.1 Implementasi Sistem.....................................................................
4.1.1 Database Sistem......................................................................
4.1.2 Fitur Login..............................................................................
4.1.3 Data SKPD..............................................................................
4.1.4 Data Pokja ULP......................................................................
4.1.5 Data Penyedia.........................................................................
4.1.6 Paket Pekerjaan.......................................................................
4.1.7 Proses Evaluasi Penawaran.....................................................
4.2 Pengujian Sistem.........................................................................
4.3 Hasil Perbandingan Sistem Gugur dengan Sistem GDSS...............
BAB V KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN........................................................
5.1 Kesimpulan..................................................................................
50
51
51
51
51
54
65
65
70
76
78
79
79
80
81
82
83
85
91
116
119
119
xiii
5.2 Saran............................................................................................
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.....................................................................................
LAMPIRAN....................................................................................................
120
122
125
xiv
DAFTAR TABEL
2.1 Pemetaan Penelitian Terdahulu..........................................................
2.2 Skala Penilaian Perbandingan Pasangan.............................................
2.3 Daftar Indeks Random Konsistensi.....................................................
2.4 Kriteria Penilaian Sederhana dan Nilai...............................................
2.5 Perbandingan Skala Penilaian antar Elemen Kriteria..........................
2.6 Perbandingan antar kriteria.................................................................
2.7 Matriks Nilai