AACPDM Altiok and Krzak
Transcript of AACPDM Altiok and Krzak
1
Motion Analysis in Understanding MovementPathology in Myelomeningocele
Haluk Altiok, MD. , Joseph Krzak, PT, PhD, PCS
Disclosure InformationAACPDM 69th Annual Meeting | October 21-24, 2015
Speaker Names: Haluk Altiok, MD and Joseph J. Krzak, PT, PhD
Disclosure of Relevant Financial Relationships
We have no financial relationships to disclose.
Disclosure of Off-Label and/or investigative uses:We will not discuss off label use and/or investigational use in
my presentation
Common gait deviations of individuals withmyelomeningocele
Linking gait deviations to treatment: surgical, bracingand assistive devices using motion analysis
Case studies – bracing and surgical (using gait analysis)
New Frontiers - using motion analysis to optimizewheel chair propulsion in patients withmyelomeningocele
Outline:
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
2
Neural tube defects Congenital malformation secondary to lack of closure of neural tube ,
incidence 1 -10/1000
Anencephaly
Spina bifida
Spina Bifida Myelomeningocele, meningocele, lipomeningocele
Myelomeningocele >90%
protrusion of neural tissue and its covering
through a defect in the vertebrae
-2/10000 live births
Each year, about 1,500 babies are bornwith spina bifida in US
Hispanic 4.17 per 10,000
Non-Hispanic Black or African-American: 2.64 per 1000
Non-Hispanic White: 3.22 per 10,000
CDC- CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
3
The etiology is not well understood, complex, multifactorial
Maternal folate status is critical for proper neural tube closure, 1991
U.S. Public Health Service recommended 400 micrograms folic acid daily 1992FDA mandated fortification of food products, January 1998Prevalence in USA decreased 31% from pre-fortification to post-fortification
Centers For Disease Prevention and Control
Spina Bifida
1960s advances in medical care ledto the survival of majority ofindividuals
10% infant death rate
75-85% are expected to reachearly adult years
Long term disability
The mortality, disability and achievement reflected theneurological level
One-third needed daily care, while 30-40 % lived independently There is lack of comprehensive and lifelong care available to the adult
The death rate from age 5 to 40 years is 10 times the national average Late deterioration is common
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
4
Social support and parental hope are more strongly associated withself –worth and health related quality of life than gender, age,diagnosis, or physical impairment
Mobility is an important determinant of quality of life for thosewith Spina Bifida (SB)
Perceived HRQOL of young adults with SB is lower, especiallywithin the physical functioning domain
The ultimate walking ability of the patientswith Spina Bifida
depends on many factors of which the mostimportant is the extent of the neurological deficit
Children with similar level of motorparesis do not always develop similarambulatory levels:
Negative factors Balance disturbances Multiple shunt revisions Spasticity Knee and hip joints contractures
Hip dislocation was not
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
5
Gait analysis has radically changed thetreatment of cerebral palsy
Assessment of patient`s pathology before and aftertreatment
Could the same principles of gait analysis( treatment based on the objective assessment)
be applied to the patients with Spina Bifida ?
Gait Analysis and Spina Bifida
Objective analysis of gait plays afundamental role in the assessment ofboth the functional limitation and theoutcome of the treatment
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
6
Gait Analysis and Spina Bifida
Gait patterns
Assessment and treatment
Effectiveness of orthoses& assistive devices
JB1.mpg
JB2.mpg
Gait Patterns
Gait PatternsKinematics
Persistent dorsiflexiondue to plantar flexorweakness led to moreflexed position at kneesand hips and anterior tiltof the pelvis
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
7
Gait PatternsKinematics
Hip abductor weakness
Produces the largestchange in gait strategy Trunk and pelvic rotation
Large lateral trunk sway
Hip abduction during stance
Pelvic hike
- In this gait pattern, energytransferred from hips down into thelower extremities
Gutierrez et al, Gait and Posture 2003
Pelvis tilt and hip flexion is increasedWeak hip extensorsHip flexors are used to initiate gait in theabsence of plantar flexors
Pelvic obliquity is increasedLateral sway of the body over the stance phasehip “Trendelenburg gait” helps to elevate thepelvis on swing side and hike the swing limbforward
Pelvic rotationInternal rotation is increased at initial contact asa result of “hiking”the swing limb phaseforward
HipAbducted at initial contact and remainsabducted over the stance phase
KineticsValgus Knee Stress
25% 50% 75%
Knee Valgus Moment1.0
-1.0
Val
Var
Nm/kg
25% 50% 75%
Knee Rotation Moment
-1.0
Nm/kg
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
8
Assessment and TreatmentHIP
Management of hip disorders hadundergone a radical change over the years
“It was not possible to determine whether or notthe patients would have been able to walk withoutiliopsoas transplantation, or a similar operationas there were no controls”
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
9
16 transplants in 13 patients
EMG activity is recorded for active hip flexion, abduction,extension and passive flexion All transplants :Active in active flexion but not in passive, some
activity during abduction, very minimal activity with extension
“ it is doubtful if it acts as a true gluteal replacement or thatindependent abduction and extension are readily achieved “
28 patients 10 patients with L4 level, all had reduced hips
No difference in the range of pelvic obliquitybetween those who had posterolateral transfer ofthe iliopsoas to greater trochanter and who hadnot
Range of hip adduction /abduction and rotationwas significantly worse
“Abductor limp is not eliminated, but lessened,self reported substantial increase in sense of security”
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
10
• 28 hips, L3-4 to S1• 85.5% active in swing phase
• 69.2% during toe-off
• 46% during stance phase
• 93% of a time the musclefunctioning during the gaitcycle as a hip abductor, it isphasic
Gait symmetry corresponded to theabsence of hip contractures and hadno relation to the presence of hipdislocation
CASE PRESENTATION
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
11
“A level pelvis and a good range of motion were foundto be more important for function than reduction of thehip “
“A pelvic obliquity and hip dislocation did not affect theambulatory status when analyzed together with scoliosis, age andneurological level”
Assessment and TreatmentKNEE
72 patients-lumbo-sacral- communityambulators,24 % did have knee symptoms of
pain, instability with activity
Selber and Dias ,23%, JPO, 18, 1998
Valgus Knee Stress
Coronal plane valgus knee stress ismultifactorial and trunk motion andexternal tibial torsion are majorcontributors
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
12
Valgus Knee Stress
25% 50% 75%
Knee Valgus Moment1.0
-1.0
Val
Var
Nm/kg
25% 50% 75%
Knee Rotation Moment
-1.0
Nm/kg
CASE VIDEO
Crouch Gait
STATIC CLINICALEXAM MAY NOTALWAYS REFLECTTHE ACTUALFUNCTIONALSTATUS OF THESEPATIENTS
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
13
Crouch Gait
Crouch Gait
Pelvic Ti lt50
-10
Ant
Post
deg
25% 50% 75%
Hip Flexion/Extension90
-20
Flex
Ext
deg
25% 50% 75%
Knee Flexion/Extension75
-15
Flex
Ext
deg
25% 50% 75%
Foot Dorsi/Plantar40
-80
Dors
Plan
deg
25% 50% 75%
Down
deg
Add
Abd
deg
deg
deg
Tibial Torsion
EXCESSIVE INTERNAL /EXTERNAL TIBIAL ROTATION Tripping , poor balance and difficulty with gait Poor fitting with the brace, pressure sore Valgus knee stress Diminished effectiveness of the solid ankle foot orthosis
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
14
Tibial Torsion
Patients with external tibial rotation deformity on the order ofmagnitude around 20° or greater who fail to demonstrateimproved knee extension moments may benefit from correctionof their increased tibial torsion
Tibial Torsion
Significant improvement in the abnormal internal kneevarus moment as well as significant increase in thestance phase knee extension
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
15
CASE VIDEO
Assessment and TreatmentCalcaneal Foot Deformity
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
16
Assessment and TreatmentCalcaneal Foot Deformity
Assessment and TreatmentCalcaneal Foot Deformity
25% 50% 75%
Tibial is Anterior5.0
0.0
V
25% 50% 75%
Pre – Post Peabody Transfer: Pedobarography
71%
10%
18%
39%
44%
17%
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
17
Effectiveness of Orthosesand Assistive Devices
With respect to barefootconditions, the use of AFOsleads to an improvement ingait and reduced energyconsumption
L4 –L5 patient group Improved ankle and knee sagittal plane
function Reductions in excessive ankle dorsiflexion,
increases in peak plantar flexor moment,reductions in crouch and knee extensor moment
Sacral patient group Diminished power generation pre-swing
All groups Increase in transverse plane knee rotation
( was normal with sacral group barefoot)
Improvements in brace construction anddesign with stronger and lighter energy-storing materials can result in improvedambulation
Carbon fiber spring orthosis Improves ankle plantar flexion moment Ankle positive work Stride length Increases energy return during the 3rd
rocker, simulating the natural push-offaction
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
18
Crutches alleviate weight bearing on the lowerextremities, decrease exaggerated pelvic and hipcompensatory kinematic movements and helpfacilitate forward progression
The maximum stressesduring swing throughgait were found to besignificantly greater thanthose during reciprocalgait
New Frontiers - using motionanalysis to optimize wheelchair propulsion in patientswith myelomeningocele
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
19
Shoulder Pain for Individuals withSpina Bifida (Roehrig and Like, 2008)
30%-41% of individuals diagnosed with spinabifida reported shoulder pain related tomanual wheelchair propulsion
Individuals older than 18 years-old hadgreater pain than those between ten andeighteen year of age.
Optimal 2-D Pushrim Kinematics
Optimal Motion:Semicircular Pattern
Users hit the pushrim lessfrequently and used more ofthe pushrim to go the samespeed.
Bonniger et al., 2005
Hurdles to Motor Learning
Learning novel tasks can be difficult for individuals with SpinaBifida due to high prevalence of impaired:
Sustained attention (Castersen and Habekost, 2013)
Executive function (Tuminello, 2012)
Intrinsic motivation (Tuminello, 2012)
Upper limb functional deficits (Dennis,2009) Arm posture and rebound
Finger–nose–finger
Rapidly alternating hand movements
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
20
Propulsive Training withAugmentative Visual Feedback
During skill acquisition,children who receivedconstant augmentative visualfeedback during trainingperformed a novel task withgreater accuracy andconsistency than childrenwho received reducedfeedback during practice
WheelchairDynamometer
Visual Display
PassiveMarkers
Motion Capture Cameras
Sullivan et al., 2008
Training with AugmentativeFeedback
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
21
Post-Training
Smartwheel(Out-Front, Mesa AZ)
X
Z
Y
SMART Wheel Report
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
22
Pre-Training
Negative Contact Forces
Negative Contact Forces
Post-Training
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele
23
Pre – Post Comparison
Value Pre Post
Average Speed (m/s) 1.2 1.4
Push Frequency (contacts/second) 0.9 0.8
Push Length (degrees) 67.2 78.0
Weight-Normalized Force (% bodyweight)
5.2 7.5
Acknowledgements
Shriners Hospitals forChildren:
Adam Graf, MS
Gerald F. Harris,Ph.D., PE
Thank you!
GCMAS Symposium at the AACPDM, October 21, 2015 Part 3: Myelomeningocele