a z4 fr - Kwantlen Polytechnic University Agendas/2007... · Degree Proposal Assessment Committee...

KwantlenUNIVERSITY COLLEGE

I Call to order

2 Confirmation of Agenda

3 Approval of Minutes Nov I 2006

4 DPAC Mandate R vvis n

5 Committee Chair Position

6 NewD Q

7 Nest Mteting Feb 7 2007

8 Adjoumment

Distribution

Jackie Baron SDianne Crisp N ChairDana Cserepes SBevin Heath Ansley SRobert Fleming SDana Goedbloed N

Casey McConill SKaren Metzger RecorderSJoshua Mitchell S

AGENDA

NOTE Agenda only distributed to deans mailing list and to presenters

Degree and Program Assessment Committee DPACWed Jan 17 2007 415 pm

G 1205 B

415

a z4 fr k435

Dianne Crisp

Dianne Crisp

445 Dianne Crispc 0C 20x1907

Susan Morris RMaxine Mott SMichelle Nakano LElaine Samwald RWendy Royal STakashi SatoSEx OfficioPanteli Tritchew S

Tally Wade NKatie Warfield R


Attendance

Degree Proposal Assessment Committee

Date

60 7

bad

elje

NAME PRESENT ABSENT

1 Baron Jackie

2 Crisp Dianne Chair

3Cserepes Dana

4 FciGkL r

5 Ei ib or VP Academic rep

6 Goedbloed Dana

7 McConill Casey

8 Mitchell Joshua ex officio Assoc Registrar

9 Morris Susan

10 Mott Maxine

I I Samwald Elaine

12 Royal Wendy

13 Sato Takashi ex officio EdCo Chair

14 Tritchew Panteli

15 Wade Tally

16 Warfielld Katie

17 144C6acV 1ya0I8

19

Guests

Metzger Karen Recorder


Attendance


Date

60 7

bad

elje


Atten


on l 7Date

NAME PRESENT ABSENT

I Baron Jackie


3 Cserepes Dana 7t4

yc so t1404 40

5 Fleming Rob or VP Academic K6 Goedbloed Dana

7 McConill Casey


9 Morris Susan

10 Mott Maxine

II 712 Samwald Elaine

13 Royal Wendy


15 Tritchew Panteli X

16 Wade Tally

17 Wmfield K tie

Guests

Metzger Karen Recorder t


Atten


on l 7Date


MINUTES

Present Jackie Baron Karen Metzger RecorderDianne Crisp Chair Joshua Mitchell

Dana Cserepes Takashi Sato

Dana Goedbloed Elaine Samwald

Casey McConill Panteli Tritchew

Shawn Erickson Tally WadeRobes Fleming

Regrets Susan Morris Wendy RoyalMaxine Mon Katie Warfield

Guests Michael Leonard Linda Schwartz

Susan Powell Radhika Singh

Degree and Program Assessment Committee DPACWed Nov 1 2006 415 pm

G 2110

1 Call to order

Dianne Crisp called the meeting to order at 419 pm

2 Confirmation of Agenda

Moved by Joshua Mitchell seconded by Panteli Tritchew to approve the agenda with the following additionafter item 6 add Revision to Approval Process Flowchart

MOTION CARRIED

3 Approval of Minutes Oct 4 2006

Moved by Elaine Samwald seconded by Tally Wade to approve the revised minutes of the Oct 4 2006meeting as distributed at the meeting

MOTION CARRIED

4 Program Revision Health Unit Coordinator Certificate

Susan Powell and Radhika Singh attended to present the proposed revisions to the Health Unit Coordinatorcertificate program They explained that the current wording re entrance requirements was inaccurate and at timesmisleading They have revised the entrance requirements to reflect current Kwantlen standards The new wordingwill include any eventual changes to English equivalencies The change is language only not substantive

Moved by Joshua Mitchell seconded by Panteli Tritchew to approve the revisions to entrance requirementsfor the Health Unit Coordinator certificate program pending wording change to the memo suggested byEnrolment and Registrar Services

MOTION CARRIED

When the revised memo has been approved by Dianne Crisp this will go forward to Education Council forapproval

This is for implementation for the Sept 2007 intake which is currently underway5 Associate of Arts in Economics

Michael Leonard presented the proposed Associate of Arts in Economics which he explained is designed to fontthe first two years of the Bachelor of Arts Economics Minor degree and has been vetted and approved by both

Degree and Program Assessment Committee DPACMinutes of Meeting Nov 1 2006Page 2

the Humanities and Social Sciences curriculum committees He stated that a few required courses are undergoingrevisions in the area of prerequisites

There was brief discussion and Michael answered questions posed by committee members

Moved by Dana Cserepes seconded by1anteli Tritchew to approve the Associate of Arts degreeEconomics pending minor revisions

MOTION CARRIED

6 Program Concept add internal consultation with other academic departmentsDianne Crisp proposed adding a section underIntemal Consultations in Appendix A of the program concepttemplate w ensure that program developer conduct adequate consultation with other departments or areas of studywhen their courses might be recommended or required for the credential being developed In the past departmentshave been surprised by increased demand for sections of courses required for credential when additional sectionshad not been budgeted for or scheduled

There was discussion about creating a separate section for this type of consultation as it is markedly different inscope from the current internal consultations required However there was general agreement to add it to AppendixA supported by clear instructions in the DPAC Manual under development Wording should include educationalprograms and units of study under the jurisdiction of Education Council from policy 112 Program Review

ACTION Karen will update the contact information in Appendix A and will replace names of individuals with theappropriate titles

Moved by Panteli Tritchew seconded bj Casey McConill to add consultation with other departments to theprogram concept template with specific wording still to be determined

MOTION CARRIED

7 Revision Degree and Non degree Program Development and Approval Process Flowchart

Rob Fleming explained that two steps needed to be added to the flowchart to make the anticipated programdevelopment timelines more realistic The first step is for the program concept to go to a Program Prioritizationcommittee following approval by Education Council and before going to the Board of Governors for approval

The second step after full program approval by Education Council and DQAB where required is to get approvalfor implementation by the Program Implementation committee

There was discussion about the need to promote new programs before approval on the assumption that approvalwould be granted for a particular start date

The flowchart is meant to be guide only and that the additional steps may take place at different times thansuggested by the flowchart depending on individual situations

8 Next Meeting Dec 6 2006

9 Adjournment Moved by Dana Cserepes to adjourn the meeting at 457 pm

DEGREE AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE DPAC

one representative from the office of theVice President Academic

Approved by Education Council Nov 7 2005revision for approval Dee@6

MANDATE

The Degree and Program Assessment Committee is a sub committee of the Education Councilwith a mandate to

Receive and review program revisions for degree and non degree programs such asAssociate Degrees Diplomas Certificates and Citations

Receive and review Program Concepts and Full Program Proposals for degree and nondegree programs such as Associate Degrees Diplomas Certificates and Citations

3 Report with recommendations to the Education Council on the status of all program conceptsfull program proposals program implementations and program revisions in such a mannerand at such times as the program approvalimplementation process and the Education Councilmay require

4 Oversee the implementation of new degree and non degree programs according to thefollowing schedule

One complete cycle of new degree and diploma programs

Two complete cycles of new certificate and citation programs

Any and all changes will be presented to DPAC for consideration aninitial implementation schedule is complete the division implementing new program can

request to stay under the purview of DPAC for an additional cycle or cycles if they will bemaking significant revisions Otherwise further reviews will be conducted under thedirection of the Program Review Committee pursuant to Policy B12

5 Review periodically DPACsmandate composition processes and approval criteria andmake such recommendations to the Education Council concerning these as may beappropriate

MEMBERSHIP

The composition of DPAC consists of

one faculty member to be selected byeach of the University Collegeseducational divisions with a curriculumcommittee and representatives fromLibrary Counselling and CooperativeEducation

the Chair of Education Council

one student to be selected by the

Afin

c6After the

Education Counc lfl r FiC

rwo to eeseleeted by the VicePreside L arnmej

one representative from the OfErcemofrEnrolment and Registrar Services

The Chair of the committee will usually be elected in April from among the current membershipfor a twoyear term to commence the following September

TERMS OF OFFICE

Faculty Members

Three years with onethird of the faculty to be selected each year 4 4 and 4 membersDPAC to determine the cohort groups The faculty selection procedure is theresponsibility of each division or service area

Student Members

One year with selection made as soon as possible following the seating of studentmembers on Education Council

Administration

To be determined by the Vice President Academic

SUPPORT

The Office of the Vice President Academic will provide support for the work of DPAC and thedegree related work of the Education Council This will consist of

managing all internal and external correspondence materials distribution etc as

search dpropose writing ce as df interested

required

providiapplicants

serving as the University Collegesprincipal contact with the41nistry concerning FullProgram Proposals once these have been approved by the Education Council and theBoard

notifying DPAC and the Education Council of any changes to Ministry regulationsprocedures or timelines that might impact on the degree approval process

a


Full Program Proposal

Name of credentialname of credential

Kwantlen University College

Dean Responsible

Date

Instructions

Kwantlen University CollegeName of credential

FPP Page 2 of 15

Fu Program Proposal

This full program proposal FPP template for degree programs follows the currentrequirements established by the Degree Quality Assessment Board DQAB Please referto Degree Program Review Criteria and Guidelines as you prepare your FPP Thedocument DegreeProgramReviewCriteriaFinalpdf is available on the commondrive under docsDPACProgram Development Forms and on Plaza on the EducationCouncil homepage

All degree FPPs must be submitted to the Post Secondary Institution Proposal SystemPSIPS Website and must provide information and discussion in a format that adheres tothe order and headings indicated in this template and must clearly indicate how theassessment criteria are being met Please refer to the criteria in Degree Program ReviewCriteria and Guidelines Page numbers from the Guidelines are indicated for each mainheading in the FPP template

The length of the FPP will vary depending on the nature of the degree program beingproposed but should be approximately 5000 words not including appendicesWhen approved by Education Council FPPs will be posted publicly on the DegreeGranting Authorization Website http wwwavedgovbccadeiteeauthorization

Appendices

Appendices should be attached to the PSIPS submission as separate documents as theywill not be posted on the public Website Appendix A Policies which contains all thepolicies normally required for a full program proposal submission is available onGDocsDPACProgram Development Forms It is not necessary to attach it for DPACand Education Council review of your FPP

When your FPP is ready please delete these instructions in their entiretyPlease also delete the highlit headings throughout the document Please retain thenumbering system to facilitate the review process

Page 2

3

3

3

J

1 Executive Summatilt

23 pages

a An overview of the rg o s history mission and academic goalsstandardized statement to be provided by Rob Fleming


FPP Page 3 of 15

b Proposed credential to be awarded including the levelp5 and category p16 ofthe degree and the specific discipline orfield ofstudy

c Location

d Facultyies or schoolsoffering the proposed new degree program

e Anticipated program start date

j Anticipated completion time in years or semesters

g A summary ofthe proposed program including

Aims goals and or objectives of the proposed program

Anticipated contribution ofthe proposed program to the mandate and strategicplan ofthe institution

Linkages between the learning outcomes and the curriculum design an indicationwhether a work experienceworkplace term is requiredfor degree completionand ifso a description ofthe purpose and role of the work experience within theprogram

Potential areassectors ofemployment for graduates andor opportunities forfurther study

Delivery methods

Program strengths

Page 3


FPP Page 4 of 15

An overview ofthe level ofsupport and recognition from other postsecondaryinstitutions and relevant regulatory or professional bodies where applicableand plans for admissions and transfer within the British Columbia postsecondaryeducation system

Relatedprograms in the institution or other British Columbia post secondaryinstitutions Indicate rationale for duplication ifany

h Name title phone number andemail address of the institutional contact person incase more information is required

Page 4

2 Degree Level Standard

vtAt


FPP Page 5 of 15

CteraAThe institution must demonstrate t t the goposed program meets or exceeds theproposed degree level standard 17r

3Submission Guidelinesa Describe how the proposed program meets the knowledge and skill level

requirements of the program degree level

Page 5


FPP Page 6 of 15

3 Credential Recognition and Nomenclature

Standard p 24

The institution must demonstrate that the programslearning outcomes and standardsare sufficiently clear at a level that willfacilitate recognition of the credential by otherpost secondary institutions professional and licensing bodies and employers Whereappropriate the program courses or curricular elements are designed to facilitatecredential recognition by other post secondary institutions and employers both withinthe province and otherjurisdictions

The name of the a degree should convey longterm meaning the content ofa degreeprogram should be consistent with the name and the reputation of the institution andpost secondary education in British Columbia should be enhanced by the quality of theoffering Beyond that is the value to graduates ofhaving a professional credentialrecognized by appropriate licensing and accrediting bodies as the basis for entry topractice

Submission Guidelines

a Explain how the design of the prygram facilitates credential recognition by otherpost secondary institutions Incli de an analysis of any research undertaken

b Where applicable describe the cpnsultations undertaken to ensure the credential and

leaming outcomes will be recoOzed by and meet the standards ofindustryemployers and regulatory licensing or credentialing bodies

In an appendix provide the reguatory licensing or credentialing bodyscurrentrequirements or standards and c Pies of letters from licensing or regulatory bodiesindicating that the credential ancl learning outcomes will be recognized

c In some instances regulatory licensing or credentialing bodies do not recognize oraccredit programs but require individuals to meet the certification requirements egcertification exams

If applicable describe the role of the regulatory licensing or credentialing body andthe steps the applicant has takento ensure individuals will be eligible to meet therequirements of the regulatory licensing or credentialing body

In an appendix provide evidence of the regulatory licensing or credentialing bodyscurrent requirements and standards

d In an appendix provide a copy of the policies and procedures pertaining to notifyingstudents of credential recognition and transfer

Page 6


FPP Page 7 of 15

4 CurriculumProgram Content

Standard p 26

The management structures and methods of the program are well defined and permitdelivery of the quality ofeducation necessaryfor students to attain the learningoutcomes The institution must demonstrate that the program in both subject matter andlearning outcome standards offers an education ofsufficient breadth and rigour to becomparable to similar programs at the proposed degree level offered by recognizedprovincial national and international post secondary institutions The curriculum mustbe current and reflect the state ofknowledge in the field orfields in the case ofinterdisciplinary and multidisciplinary programs


a Describe the program structure and the length of the program number of credithours and proposed student evaluation

b identify the prescribed set of core and prerequisite courses Course descriptionsincluded in theshould be of the level of detail found in the academic calendar

Provide full Bourse outlin s in an appendix TuIC

c Identify which courses already exist at the institution and which new courses will beimplemented as a result of the program

d Explain how the course and curriculum requirements wilkocontribute to theintended goals of the program

e I f an external review of the proposed program is undertaken before submission of thedegree proposal in an appendix please provide a copy of the external review

f Where work experience or field placements are a component of the program describethe institutionsplans to develop placement opportunities for students and the level ofsupport the institution will extend to students seeking placements

g Where applicable describe the anticipated outcomes of the work experience or fieldplacement associated with the program how the experience offered will provide theopportunity to put the stated learning outcomes into practice and how the studentswill be evaluated during their placements

Page 7


Distance education


FPP Page 8 of 15

5 Learning MethodologiesProgram Delivery

Standard p 28

Learning methodologies are the methods ofdelivery that will be used to achieve thedesired learning outcomes at the degree level standard and al an acceptable level ofquality The institution must demonstrate that it has the expertise and resources tosupport the proposed method ofdelivery and to ensure its effectiveness In some cases itmay be more appropriate for the institution to demonstrate that it has a realistic plan toput the necessary expertise in place

Policy D3 information and Educational Technology Resources

a Explain the learning methodolog methodologies to be used

Indicate which of thefollowing ethodologies will be incorporated into the learningenvironment of the new degree Apgram and how they will be used

Experiential learning eg ci operative ethicalion clinical work term orsimulated work experience

Independent study computer assisted instruction etc 0

Lectures labs tutorials and

Other

b In an appendix include any picies pertaining to technologybasedcomputerbased or webbased learningand modes of delivery

Page 8

6 Admission and TransferResidency

Standard

t 114 Credit for Prior Learning


FPP Page 9 of 15

The institution should demonstrate that the program is designed to provide flexibleadmission and transfer arrangements Where appropriate the program courses orcurricular elements are designed to facilitate credit transfer by other post secondaryinstitutions both within the province and other jurisdictions

Note The British Columbia Council on Admissions and Transfer BCCAT administersthe British Columbia Online Transfer Guide that provides information on course orprogram articulation agreements between institutions

Institutions are encouraged to contact BCCAT early in the development of the newdegree program proposal for information on admissions and transfer in British Columbia

httpwwwbccatbcca


a Describe the admission requirements for this program in an appendix provide a copyof the policies and procedures on admissions

Policy C18 Admission to the University College

b Describe the existing practice or proposed policy for the granting of transfer credit forequivalent courses andor programs completed at other institutions that will satisfythe requirements for this program Include a copy of the policy in an appendix

B15 Transfer ofArticulated Courses from other Post Secondary Institutions to

Kwantlen University College

c Institutions are encouraged to have in place a policy and process that providesstudents credit for previous post secondary studies so that they are not required torepeat course they have previously completed If applicable describe the policy andpractice for granting credit toward meeting requirements for this program based onprior learning assessment if applicable include a copy of the policy in an appendix

B8 Credit for Advanced Placement Program Examinations

B9 Credit for huernational Baccalaureate Program Courses

d Describe the residency requirements for this program Specify the minimum numberof credits that must be completed at the institution awarding the degreeL5 Requirements for Graduation

L4 Graduation with Distinction

Page 9

Kwantlen University CollegeName of credentialFPP Page 10 of 15

e Describe existing arrangements r plans for establishing articulation agreements sothat transfer credit will be grante for courses completed in this program towardmeeting requirements for creden tats offered at other institutions

NOTE Information on a provingial transfer friendly course outline form forvoluntary use by post secondary nstitutions is available on the British ColumbiaCouncil on Admissions and Tranfer Web site http bccatbccaoutline

Page 10



7 Faculty

Standard p 31

The institution must demonstrate that it has the human resources necessary to developand deliver a quality degree program In some cases it may not be feasible for aninstitution to hire faculty until it receives program approval In these cases theinstitution should provide the specific faculty selection criteria that will be used to ensurenewfaculty hires have the necessary qualifications for the degree level being offered andprogram being proposed

a Please indicate the number of faculty and instructors present and future and otherstaff required to mount this program and their qualifications

Provide an enrolment plan for the length of the program eg fouryear projection ofcumulative enrolment that accounts for projected attrition and indicates the numberof staff faculty technical teaching assistants etc assigned to the program

indicate if any of these positions will be new to the institution in cases where newfaculty will be hired provide the specific faculty selection criteria that will be used toensure new faculty hires have the necessary qualifications for the disciplinary andspecialty areas and degree level being offered

b Provide any policies pertaining to faculty and instructors specific to the programincluding

policies that define the minimum academicprofessional credentials required offaculty teaching all courses in the program and where appropriate serving asmembers of thesis or project examining committees

Policy G7 Faculty Recruitment

Policy G7a Criteria for Recruitment ofFaculty

Policy G7h Minimum OualifcationsFactlty Positions

protection of academic freedom

Principles ofAcademic Freedom

teaching supervision and student counselling loads and

professional development faculty7P

Page 1 1


c Provide the institutionspolicies fttd practices on the type of academic appointmentof faculty specific to this program eg continuingorregular appointments andtemporary appointments

d In an appendix provide the curri vitae of faculty members and instructors

specific to the program that denttnstrates thatthethey possess an appropriate balancefrom among the following requir rents

Academic credentials appro I iate to the degree level being offered Facultyteaching applied baccalaurea degrees have an appropriate balance ofprofessional qualifications ademic credentials and experience

Any required academic and4desired professional credentials andor

A demonstration of current i volvement in research and professional activity thatrepresents an appropriate ba1z nce of research and intellectual leadership in thediscipline and the field of spicialization

Page 12

0

0

0

4

8 Program Resources

Standard p 3

The institution must demonstrate that it has the physical learning and informationresources both startup and development needed to assure a program ofacceptablequality These include facilities equipment library resources laboratories computingfacilities shops specialized equipment etc and cooperative work placements where thisis a component of the program In some cases an institution may not be able to ensureresources are in place until after it receives program approval In these cases theinstitution may bring fonvard a proposal based on a realistic planfor putting theappropriate resources in place as an alternative to demonstrating that all resources arein place

Standardized statement to be provided as per criteria physical plant equipme lc

and plans for renewal and upgrading of learning and information sources

FPr ex ur8Lt

a Describe the resources that will be required to mount this program includingi library resources onsite library resources such as Webbased or interlibrary

arrangements Include the number of holdings print relevant to the field ofstudy and number of holdings electronic ie programspecific databases referto Library Assessment template completedfor the program concept


ii computers and computer access

iii classrooms laboratories and equipment

iv Existing and shared resources at the institution and at other institutions that willbe used to offer the program and

v Additional resources that will be required to offer this program


b Provide the intended implementation schedule for the new program and evidence ofthe appropriateness of the schedule given the timing of the proposal and readiness ofthe institution to offer the program

c Institutions must demonstrate that they have the necessary resources to mount andsustain a quality program at the proposed degree level or a realistic plan for puttingthe appropriate resources in place subsequent to program approval Describe theinstitutionsplans for renewal and upgrading of learning and information resources

Page 13

9 Program Consultation

The institution must demonstrate that it has consulted appropriate individuals andorganizations in the development of the program proposalp35


a Provide a list and brief explanation of the nature of the consultations that haveoccurred in the development of the degree program

b Attach all written comments boti positive and negative fromrelevant employers

relevant professional associations

program advisory comnlitteej


other British Columbia institutions this will include commentsments provided throughthe peer review process on P4IPS

institutions outside British Columbia

experts in the proposed fieldlof study and

external academic consultants

c If other individuals or groups have been involved describe their roles in thecollection and evaluation of information leading to the development and submissionof this proposal

d include a list of anticipated employment destinations for graduates of this program

Page 14

10 Program Review and Assessment

Standard 362In order to ensure the ongoing currency fthe program and the quality of its learningoutcomes the institution must show ev dence that a program review and assessmentprocedure is in place



a Indicate the policiesprocedures that are planned for ensuring adequate depth andbreadth and frequency of ongoing review and assessment once the program has beenimplemented

In an appendix provide copies of the formal approved policy and procedures forperiodic review of programs that address the program review elements described inthe criteria above

Policy B 12 Program Review

Page 15

DEGREE PROGRAM REVIEW

CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES

November 2006

Acknowledgements

This version of the Degree Program Review Criteria and Guidelines was established andpublished by the Minister of Advanced Education in November 2006

This version of the criteria and guidelines which outlines the requirements for submittinga proposal for a new degree program and the assessment criteria for giving or refusingconsent has been prepared with advice from many stakeholders and quality assessmentexperts

The Ministry of Advanced Education and the Degree Quality Assessment Boardacknowledges with thanks the many individuals and organizations that shared theirexperience and expertise

Contact information

Mailing AddressDegree Quality Assessment Board SecretariatMinistry of Advanced EducationPO Box 9177 Stn Prov Govt

Victoria BC V8W 91

Physical AddressDegree Quality Assessment Board SecretariatMinistry of Advanced Education1st FI 835 1 lumboldt StVictoria BC V8V 4W8


Phone 250 3875163Facsimile 250 3568851Email AVERDQABsecrciariatroovbccaWeb site http wwwavedgovbccadegreeauthorizationwelcomehtm

Modifications to Policies Criteria and Guidelines

The board recommends to the Minister of Advanced Education policies criteria andguidelines that will apply for the purposes of giving or refusing consentapproval orattaching terms and conditions to consent

The Minister of Advanced Education reserves the right to modify policies criteria andguidelines from time to time and will post current versions on the website

It is the applicantsresponsibility to use current policies criteria and guidelines

November 2006

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AcknowledgementsContact InformationModifications to Policies Criteria and Guidelines

I BACKGROUND

A Role of the MinistryB Recent History of Legislative Changes

I1 LEGISLATION AND POLICY FRAMEWORKS

A Private and OutofProvince Public Institutions

B British Columbia Public Post secondary InstitutionsC Institutions with Exempt StatusD Branch Operations and Collaborative Partnerships

ii


III OVERVIEW OF THE QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROCESS

A Degree Quality Assessment BoardDegree Granting Authorization Web SiteQuality Assessment ProcessUse of External ExpertsNomination of External ExpertsDifferences in Submission Components and Approval ProcessPublic PostingReporting and Monitoring Institutions with consent under theDegree Authorization Act

B Quick Reference Flow Chart Quality Assessment ProcessC Definition of a New Degree ProgramD Determination of a New Degree ProgramE How to Submit a New Degree Proposal

Post Secondary Institution Proposal System

November 2006

IV DEGREE PROGRAM REVIEW CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES

A Submission Format Full Program Proposal1Ex ecutive Summary2Deg ree Level Standards3Credential R ecognition and Nomenclature4Curr iculumProgram Content5L earning MethodologiesProgram Delivery6Adm ission and TransferResidency7Facult y8Pr ogram Resources9Pr ogram Consultation10 Program Review and AssessmentAppendices to the Full Program Proposal

B Submission Format Program Proposal Institutions with ExemptStatus

APPENDICES to Degree Program Review Criteria and Guidelines

I Operational Guidelines for the review ofOutofprovince InstitutionsOperating in British Columbia through Branch Operations and

2 Operational Guidelines for Outof Province Institutions Operating in BritishColumbia through Collaborative Arrangements

3 Operational Guidelines for Recognizing Prior Assessment andAccreditations

4 Use of External Experts

5 Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Policy Board Members andExternal Experts

6 Workflow Diagrams Degree Approval Process

7 DQAB Guidelines on Naming of Degrees


November 2006

1 BACKGROUND

A Role of the Ministry

The Ministry of Advanced Education AVED has the mandate to ensure that thepost secondary education system in British Columbia is of high quality relevant andresponsive to changing economic technological and social forces in the provinceAVEDsrole is to promote a more efficient and integrated postsecondary educationsystem that enhances student choice and maximizes the economic and social benefits ofinvesting in the future This includes ensuring that British Columbia has a well preparedworkforce for the 21 Century and that its citizens have the skills and knowledgenecessary to respond to a rapidly changing environment

B Recent History of Legislative Changes


On April 11 2002 the Degree Authorization Act the Act was introduced into theProvincial Legislature The Act received Royal Assent on May 9 2002 and was broughtinto force by regulation on November 7 2003

With the passing of the Act the British Columbia postsecondary education systemunderwent significant change For the first time in British Columbia private andoutofprovince public institutions have the means to legally grant degrees inBritish Columbia and use the word university in their name without having their ownstatute The consequential amendments to the Act expanded the degree grantingauthority of British Columbia public institutions to provide the opportunity for publiccolleges to grant applied baccalaureate degrees and public university colleges andprovincial institutes to grant applied mastersdegrees

The new degree approval process was revised to accommodate the expanded systemThe Degree Program Review Committee was replaced by the Degree Quality AssessmentBoard the board an independent advisory board appointed by the Minister of AdvancedEducation to conduct reviews and make recommendations to the minister

A quality assessment process for determining which institutions are eligible to grantBritish Columbia degrees including private institutions and public institutions locatedoutside the province has been established to ensure that a high standard is maintainedacross all degree programs offered in the province

II LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY FRAMEWORKS

A Private and OutOfProvince Public Post secondary Institutions

The Degree Authorization Act applies to all private and outofprovince publicpostsecondary institutions and does not apply to British Columbia publicpostsecondary institutions

1

November 2006


The Act requires private and outofprovince public post secondary institutions to obtainconsent from the minister if they wish to do any of the following

grant or confer a degree in British Columbiaprovide a program in British Columbia which leads to a degree that is conferredinside or outside British Columbiaadvertise a program offered in British Columbia leading to a degree that is conferredinside or outside British Columbia and

sell or offer for sale a diploma certificate or other document that implies the grantingor conferring of a degree

The Act provides that the minister may give an applicant consent if the minister issatisfied that the applicant has undergone a quality assessment process and been found tomeet the criteria established by the minister under the Act for the purposes of giving orrefusing consent The board is responsible for the quality assessment process and fordetermining whether applicants have met the criteria

The Act provides that the minister may attach terms and conditions to a consentincluding a termination date after which the consent will cease to be effective unlessrenewed by the minister The scope of consent is identified in the terms and conditionsof consent for each program Consent is normally for five years after which timeapplicants may apply for renewal of consent

The minister cannot give consent unlessthe minister is satisfied that the applicant has given financial security to protect theinterests of students if security is required by the regulations in respect of the personseeking consent andthe applicant has made adequate arrangements to protect student transcripts

B British Columbia Public Postsecondary Institutions

Under the University Act British Columbia public universities must not establish a newdegree program without the approval of the minister

Under the College and Institute Act the Minister may designate by order appliedbaccalaureate degree programs at 13ritish Columbia public colleges and baccalaureatedegree programs and applied mastersdegree programs at British Columbia publicuniversity colleges and provincial institutes

The Ministry requires new degree program proposals other than proposals frominstitutions with exempt status to be reviewed by the board before proceeding to theminister for approval under the University Act and the College and Institute Act

Public colleges proposing to offer applied baccalaureate degrees and public universitycolleges and provincial institutes proposing to offer applied mastersdegrees mustreceive ministry approval for the proposed degree program prior to submitting a fullprogram proposal to the board The Applied Degrees Policy Framework and MinistryReview can be found at

2

November 2006

3

http www avedgovbccadegreeauthorizationbcpubl isnewmandate appl ieddegreeshtm

C Institutions with Exempt Status


Institutions with proven track records ten years history in enrolling students in programsat a particular degree level in British Columbia and appropriate governance mechanismsin place may apply for exempt status at a specific degree level For example if aninstitution meets the ten year prerequisite period for baccalaureate degrees and satisfiesother criteria for exempt status the institution could apply for exempt status in respect ofnew baccalaureate degrees

An institution with exempt status has demonstrated that it has rigorous ongoing programand institutional quality assessment processes both internal and external When aninstitution has been granted exempt status at a certain degree level proposals submittedfor new degree programs at that level would go directly to the minister for approvalfollowing the 30day public review period on the ministrysweb site The DegreeQuality Assessment Board will not review the proposal unless the minister has concernsabout it and refers it to the board

For the submission format for new degree programs for institutions with exempt statusplease refer to Section IV B Submission Format Program Proposal Institutions withExempt Status

Further information on how to obtain exempt status may be found on the DegreeGranting Authorization web site The Criteria and Guidelines for Exempt Status areposted at

http wwwavedgovbccadegreeau thorization bcpubI isexemptstarushun

and

httpwwwavcdgovhccadegrecauthorization pandooppcriteriacxcmpthtm

3

November 2006

D Branch Operations and Collaborative Partnerships


For institutions with headquarters in another jurisdiction that wish to operate a satellite orbranch location in British Columbia or through a collaborative arrangement with anotherinstitution the degree program review criteria and guidelines will be applied to theorganizationsoperations in British Columbia and may include a review of how thesedegree offerings vary or are the same as degree offerings in the home jurisdiction

Private and outofprovince public institutions should refer to Appendices I and 2 for the

Operational Guidelines for the Review ofOutofprovince Institutions Operating inBritish Columbia through Branch Operations andOperational Guidelines for OutofProvince Institutions Operating in BritishColumbia through Collaborative Arrangements

For organizations with headquarters in British Columbia that also wish to operate asatellite or branch location outside British Columbia and grant British Columbia degreesthe degree program review criteria and guidelines will be applied to operations bothinside and outside British Columbia as appropriate

4

November 2006

111 OVERVIEW OF THE QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROCESS

A Degree Quality Assessment Board

Degree Granting Authorization Web Site

Institutions should refer to the Degree Granting Authorization web site for completeinformation on the submission review and approval processes for new degrees

Quality Assessment Process

http wwwavedgovbceadegree authorization


The Degree Quality Assessment Board the board conducts quality assessment processesto ensure that new degree programs meet consistent and high quality criteria The qualityassessment process is initiated with a 30 day public review of the full program proposalvia the public Degree Granting Authorization web site This enables the general publicincluding academic experts from inside and outside British Columbia the opportunity toreview the full program proposal and provide comments to the submitting institution andthe board

In conducting the quality assessment processes the board may require institutions toundergo organization andor program reviews to inform its assessment of an institutionsdegree program proposal Although the quality assessment process may vary dependingon the nature of a submission the board is committed to a quality assessment process thatis streamlined and efficient and works towards meeting an average approval timeframe ofsix months Institutions are encouraged to submit proposals 12 18 months prior to theplanned startup date of the program to allow sufficient time to undergo the qualityassessment process and allow sufficient time for the institution to market and recruit for

the program once Ministersapproval or consent is received

Prior to or during the submission process the Ministry of Advanced Education willconsult with the Ministry of Health in regards to new degree programs in the health fieldThe provincial government is the key employer in the health field As such the Ministryof Advanced Education consults with the Ministry of Health to ensure the provincescurrent and future health human resource needs are met

For applications by private and outofprovince public postsecondary institutions theboard will determine whether an organization review should be required and if sowhether any prior assessments can be recognized as satisfying all or part ofBritish Columbiasorganization review criteria See Appendix 3 for the OperationalGuidelines for Recognizing Prior Assessment and Accreditation If an organizationreview is required the board will select the review experts and the institution submittingthe proposal will pay any costs associated with the review

5

November 2006

Use of External Experts

Nomination of External Expens

6


British Columbia public post secondary institutions will not be required to undergo anorganization review

For all degree proposals submitted by non exempt institutions the board will determinewhether a desk audit of program materials is adequate or whether a site visit by externalexperts will be required depending on the level and quality of information available fromthe applicant

If the board determines that a review by external experts is required it is expected thatexternal experts will have

an advanced academic credential related to the subject area under review normally atthe doctoral level in the discipline or terminal level if in a particular field

relevant academic experience in areas such as quality assessment eg as appraisersfor accrediting bodies or as reviewers of degree programs curriculum designteaching and learning and administration

any required or desired professional credentials andor related work experience

Please refer to Appendix 4 for the complete policies on Use ofExternal Experts andAppendix 5 for the Conflict ofInterest and Confidentiality Policy Board Members andExternal Experts

The institution submitting the proposal may provide their nominations for externalexperts to the board by providing

Name and address of the suggested expertsTelephone numberFax number

Email

Academic credentials

Professional designationsBrief biographical paragraph on the suggested experts

Institutions may provide up to five nominations The board takes the institutionssuggestions under consideration but reserves the right to make the final determinationand will select the experts The institution submitting the proposal will pay any costsassociated with the subject experts review The applicant will be consulted prior to theselection of any external experts to avoid any conflicts of interest Any reports preparedby external experts will be made available to the submitting institution for response or

A desk audit is a review of the submission materials by an external expertsbut does not include a sitevisit to the institution

November 2006

comment

Differences in Submission Components and Approval Process


The board reviews the degree proposal public comments the subject experts reports andthe submitting institutionsresponse and make recommendations to the minister onwhether the degree proposal should be approved approved with conditions or notapproved

While proposals from all institutions will be evaluated against the same set of standardsminor differences in the submission components and approval process may require somedifference of focus in the drafting of proposals Some examples of such differences areas follows

Private and outofprovince public institutions may be required to undergo anorganization review as part of the degree program assessment British Columbiapublic institutions are not required to undergo this process as a substantiallysimilar review process took place as part of their initial establishment

The criteria and guidelines include requirements applicable to private andoutofprovince public institutions on associate degrees and information on thescope and conditions of ministerial consent that are not part of the submissionrequirements for British Columbia public institutions These are not part of thesubmission requirements for British Columbia public institutions as these issuesare addressed through other statutes governing the operations of these institutions

Public Posting

The outcomes of the quality assessment process will be posted on the Degree GrantingAuthorization web site This will include the final program proposal if changes weremade a summary outlining the boards recommendation and rationale for therecommendation and the ministersdecisions to grant or not grant approval or consent

Reporting and Monitoring Institutions with consent under the Degree Authorization Act

Institutions with consent under the Degree Authorization Act are required to submit to theMinistry an annual reporting template outlining the progress of the institution Theannual reporting template is a term and condition of consent that must be provided on anannual basis to ensure that institutions continue to meet the terms and conditions ofconsent

The report includes information such as enrolments faculty information and a programreview summary The report also requires information from the institution in relation toany special conditions required by the Minister

7

November 2006

8


Ministry staff will monitor the collection of the annual reporting template and will liaisewith the institution should information need to be clarified The Ministry will inform theBoard as to the results of the report and if any issues were identified

November 2006

O


B Quick Reference Flow Charts

Please refer to Appendix 6 for workflow diagrams for the degree approval process

C Definition of a New Degree Program

British Columbia public institutions will submit for review all new degree programs atthe baccalaureate mastersor doctoral level

Private and outofprovince public institutions governed under the Degree AuthorizationAct will submit for review all new degree programs at the associate baccalaureatemastersor doctoral level Private and outofprovince public institutions areencouraged to contact the British Columbia Council on Admissions and Transfer early inthe stages of developing an associate degree regarding transfer credit requirements

A new degree program is defined asAn associate degree granted or provided by a private or outofprovince publicinstitution governed under the Degree Authorization Acta baccalaureate mastersor doctoral degree that has not been previously granted orconferred by the post secondary institution in British Columbia ora baccalaureate mastersor doctoral degree granted or conferred by the postsecondary institution in British Columbia containing one or more of the followingelements

a new major or field of specialization although a new honours program in a fieldin which a major is currently offered will not require reviewan existing interdisciplinary major for which the majority of the courses are newor are substantially altered to conform to the programsobjectivesajoint major if one or more of the fields in the joint major is not alreadyrepresented by an approved majorrevision of a programsmajor objectives resulting in significant changes andsignificant revision of a program that warrants credential renaming

D Determination of a New Degree Program

In some instances it may be difficult to determine whether a proposed change in programofferings is of sufficient magnitude to be classed as a new degree If there is doubt theinstitution should contact the Degree Quality Assessment Board secretariatInstitutions that are proposing a new minor in a program area for which the institutiondoes not already have approval to offer a major or a new concentration must notify thesecretariat of the content of the proposed new minor or concentration Institutions shouldprovide

evidence of the institutionsinternal approval for the new optionthe program structure eg number of credit hoursan outline of the curriculum indicating which courses already exist at the institutionand which courses will be new

9

November 2006


the proposed calendar description of the courses andhow the courses and curriculum will be integrated to contribute to the intended goalsof the program

The board will within 45 days determine whether the change is of sufficient magnitudeto be classed as a new degree The change must not be implemented until the board hasmade this determination and if deemed a new program until the degree program reviewhas been successfully completed and ministerial approval granted

In all cases the board reserves the right to determine whether a review is required

Note For private and outofprovince public institutions governed by the DegreeAuthorization Act ministerial consent will be specific to the activity program and sitedescribed in application The terms and conditions of consent will clearly identify thecircumstances under which consent holders will be required to notify the minister of amaterial change in circumstance ie ownership change location change materialchange in learning outcomes

E How to submit a new degree proposalPost Secondary Institution Proposal System

The Post Secondary Institution Proposal System is a webbased application system forthe submission and review of proposals Applicants will submit application materialselectronically The Post Secondary Institution Proposal System is a password protecteddatabase and has a closed user group

Institutions seeking to submit an application through the Post Secondary InstitutionProposal System must first obtain a User ID and password from the Degree QualityAssessment Board secretariat Please refer to the web site for information on obtaining aUser ID

http wwwavedeovoccadegreeauthorizationapplyherehtm

The institution will be required to confirm its institutional information in prescribed datafields before submitting a Full Program Proposal in Adobe PDF format as an attachmentWhen creating Adobe PDF files navigation tools such as bookmarks should beincorporated into the documentsto allow the reader to navigate quickly to a particularpage or section within the document Information on navigation tools can be found inyour Adobe Acrobat documentation

Important The Full Program Proposal will also be posted on the Degree GrantingAuthorization web site via the Post Secondary Institution Proposal System while thesubmission is under review See Applications under Review at

lutpwwwayAgovbccacleareeauthorization

The Degree Quality Assessment Board secretariat may be contacted directly atA VEDDQABsecretariat@govbcca

10

November 2006


IV NEW DEGREE PROGRAM REVIEW CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES

The new degree submissions criteria and guidelines apply to all institutions governed bythe University Act Royal Roads University Act Thompson Rivers University Act Collegeand Institute Act and the Degree Authorization Act that are seeking ministersapprovalor consent to offer provide or grant degrees

The proposal is not to be posted on the Post Secondary Institution Proposal System untilthe senior governance body eg Board of Governors or equivalent has approved thedevelopment of the new degree program as appropriate within the institutionsplan andpriorities

A Full Program Proposal for submission on the Post Secondary Institution ProposalSystem must provide information and discussion in a format that adheres to the order andheadings below Degree programs will be assessed against the standards and criteriadescribed in categories 2 10

Institutions should provide the board with written permission to consult with anyprofessional accrediting or regulatory body named in the submitted documentation

A Submission Format Full Program Proposal approximately5000 words

The length of the Full Program Proposal will vary considerably depending upon thenature of the degree program being proposed but should be approximately 5000 wordsnot including appendices

Full Program Proposal

In conducting the degree program review external experts andor the board will beguided but not limited by the criteria outlined for each of the following standards

I Executive Summary2 Degree Level Standard3 Credential Recognition and Nomenclature4 CurriculumProgram Content5 Learning MethodologiesProgram Delivery6 Admission and TransferResidency7 Faculty8 Program Resources9 Program Consultation10 Program Review and Assessment

When the applicant is required to provide information on institutional policies thesubmission should include only a summary of the policies Full policies should beattached as appendices or provided directly to external experts if the board requires areview

November 2006

Information that the institution considers proprietary should be inclucled inappendices to the hill program proposal Examples of proprietary information mayinclude referee letters letters of support which contain personal information such asnames and addresses and financial information


Submission under the degree quality assessment process will be subject to the provisionsof the Freedom ofInformation and Protection ofPrivacy Act applicable to BC publicinstitutions and the Personal Information Protection Act applicable to private and outofprovince public institutions

Appendices

Appendicesshould be attached to the submission on the Post Secondary InstitutionProposal System as separate documentsAppendices will not be posted on the public web site

Appendices should indicate an appendix name and number and also reference theapplicable criterionsubmission guideline

NEW FOR 2006

THE FULL PROGRAM PROPOSAL WILL BE POSTED PUBLICLY ON THE

DEGREE GRANTING AUTHORIZATION WEB SITE

via the Post Secondary Institution Proposal System while the submission is under reviewand will be open to public comment for 30 days from the date of posting

http wwwavedgovbccadegree authorization

This is intended to provide the public with an opportunity to comment on the applicationand to meet the boardscommitment to an open and accountable process The web sitewill indicate the closing date for public comment and will also indicate that commentsfrom the public are to be directed to the submitting institution and copied to the boardsecretariat

IMPORTANT

Information that the submitting institution considers to be proprietary in naturemust be submitted in separate documents in the form of appendices

Appendices will not be posted on the public web site

12

November 2006

1 Executive Summary approximately 2 3 pages in length


The Executive Summary must present in a succinct manner the purpose of the proposaland a summary of the key objectives and outcomes of the proposed degree program andmust include the following information

a An overview of the organizationshistory mission and academic goals

b Proposed credential to be awarded including the level and category of the degree andthe specific discipline or field of study

c Location

d Facultyies or schoolsoffering the proposed new degree program

e Anticipated program start date

1 Anticipated completion time in years or semesters

g A summary of the proposed program includingAims goals andor objectives of the proposed programAnticipated contribution of the proposed program to the mandate and strategicplan of the institutionLinkages between the learning outcomes and the curriculum design an indicationwhether a work experiencework place term is required for degree completionand if so a description of the purpose and role of the work experience within theprogram

potential areassectors of employment for graduates andor opportunities forfurther studyDelivery methodsProgram strengthsAn overview of the level of support and recognition from other post secondaryinstitutions and relevant regulatory or professional bodies where applicable andplans for admissions and transfer within the British Columbia post secondaryeducation systemRelated programs in the institution or other British Columbia postsecondaryinstitutions Indicate rationale for duplication if any

h Name title phone number and e address of the institutional contact person incase more information is required

13

November 2006

2 Degree Level Standard

Standard


The institution must demonstrate that the proposed program meets or exceeds theproposed degree level standard

Associate Degrees British Columbia Public Post secondary Institutions

The British Columbia Council on Admissions and Transfer provides a definition ofassociate degrees on its website

Associate degrees offered by British Columbia public post secondary institutions do notrequire review of the board or approval of the minister

Associate Degrees Academic under the Degree Authorization Act

The Degree Authorization Act provides a statutory means for private and outofprovincepublic post secondary institutions to offer associate degrees New associate degreeprograms to be offered by private and outofprovince public postsecondary institutionsgoverned by the Act require ministerial consent

Currently in British Columbia an associate degree comprises two years of universitylevel study 60 credit hours in a variety of academic areas and is granted transfer creditat the following British Columbia public universities Simon Fraser University SFU orThe University of British Columbia UBC or University of Northern British ColumbiaUNBC or University of Victoria UVIC Graduates of an associate degree will havecompleted a broad range of course offerings balanced with in depth study in specificdisciplines The requirements of an associate degree are sufficiently flexible to preparestudents for work citizenship and an enriched life as an educated person and to lay asolid foundation for further study

The British Columbia Council on Admissions and Transfer provides a definition of andstipulates the requirements for associate degrees on its website

Private and outofprovince public institutions are encouraged to contact theBritish Columbia Council on Admissions and Transfer early in the development of anassociate degree regarding the articulation requirements

httpwvwbecatbccapubstassoc0500htm

The duration of consent for an associate degree offered by an institution governed by theDegree Authorization Act will initially be for a period of three years The board will

British Columbia Council on Admissions and Transfer Requirement for Associate of Arts Degree andAssociate of Science Degrees httphvwwbccatbccapubsassoc0500htm

November 2006

14

Degree Categories

Degree Level Standards

I Depth and Breadth of Knowledge2 Knowledge of Methodologies3 Application of Knowledge4 Communication Skills

5 Awareness of Limits of Knowledge6 Professional CapacityAutonomy

15


review at least annually the progress of the institutions towards the goal of offering aminimum of 20 courses all of which must fulfill requirements for the associate degreesand each of which must be articulated with at least one of the four public researchuniversities in British Columbia SFU or UBC or UNBC or UVIC

The following descriptions of degree categories are intended to capture the most salientgeneral aspects of the three principal degree levels offered in Canada They apply to abroad spectrum of disciplines program types and program lengths

The focus of the degree level standards is on the expectations of graduates at each degreeThe standards stipulate the demonstrable transferable learning skills and level of masteryofa body of specialized knowledge in six dimensions

The shades of distinction between degrees are determined by the capacity of the graduateat each level to act competently creatively and independently and by their proximity tothe forefront ofa discipline andor profession Among other things the degree levelstandards are intended

a to facilitate the assessment of credentials for broad purposes of credit transfer andcredential recognition

b to provide clear learning outcome standards to instructional and program designersc as a broad framework for quality assurance purposes

The standards are intended to be cumulative each degree level presupposes theaccomplishment of an earlier one

November 2006

BACHELORSDEGREE

Degree Category Bachelor Degree

16


Program Design and Outcome EmphasisThe credential awarded for the bachelor degree is designed to acquaint the student withthe basic conceptual approaches and methodologies of the principal discipline ordisciplines that constitute the program of study to provide some specialized knowledgeand to nurture the capacity for independent work in the disciplinedisciplines and field ofpractice

All bachelor programs are designed to provide graduates with knowledge and skills thatenable them to develop the capacity for independent intellectual work That capacity maybe demonstrated by the preparation under supervision of one or more essays a terminalresearch paper thesis project exhibition or other researchbased or performance basedexercise that demonstrates methodological competence and capacity for independent andethical intellectualcreative work and where relevant the exercise of professionalresponsibility in a field of practice

Some bachelor degree programs ate intended to provide a wide exposure to severaldisciplines others to provide an indepth education in one or more disciplines often aspreparation for graduate study and still others to provide a blend of theory and practicethat equips students for entry into an occupation or profession Despite that diversityeach bachelor degree program must meet a substantial and common set of competencyoutcomes as outlined below to justify use of the bachelor degree label The range ofbachelor programs includes

Programs designed to provide a broad education as an end in itself They may alsoprepare graduates for employment in a variety of fields and or for admission to secondentry professional programs Examples B Hum Humanities General BA andGeneralBScdegrees

Programs designed to provide indepth study in academic disciplines They normallyprepare students for graduate study in the disciplinesand for employment in a varietyof fields

Programs with an appliedfocus They blend theory and practice with content selectedto ensure mastery of the field of practice and prepare students for employment and foradvanced study in relevant graduate and professional programs

Programs with a professional focus They are designed to prepare graduates to meetadmission requirements and to he competent practitioners in the profession Some ofthem are first entry programs others are second entry programs that is they requiresome prior degree level study or even a degree They normally require periods ofpractical experience apprenticeship internship articling clinical etc The capacityfor independent professional work is demonstrated by academic and practicalexercises under supervision followed by admission tests to the profession Thoughconsidered to be bachelor programs in academic standing some professional programs

November 2006


yield degrees with other nomenclatureegDDS Dental Surgery MDMedicine LLB orJD Juris Doctor

Preparation for Employment and Further Study

In addition to providing personal and intellectual growth bachelor programs in varyingdegrees may prepare students for entry into graduate study in the field secondentryprofessional degree programs or employment in one or more fields

Length ofProgram

Owing primarily to variations in pre university studies among the provinces classroominstruction is typically eight semesters or more in duration normally 120 credits or theequivalent and may be supplemented by required professional experience egsupervised practica internships and work terms

Admission Requirements

Admission normally requires at a minimum a secondary school andor universitypreparatory courses a minimum gradepoint average and other program specificrequirements Students lacking these credentials may be admitted on a part time orprobationary basis with continuation subject to acceptable academic achievementSecond entry programs normally require at least two or three years of completed degreelevel studies or in some cases the prior or concurrent completion of anotherundergraduate degree

Degree Level Standard Bachelor Degree

1 Depth and Breadth ofKnowledgea Knowledge and critical understanding in a field of study that builds upon their

secondary education and includes the key assumptions methodologies andapplications of the discipline andor field of practice

b Basic understanding of the range of fields within the disciplinefield of practice and ofhow the discipline may intersect with fields in related disciplines

c The ability to gather review evaluate and interpret information including newinformation relevant to the discipline and to compare the merits of alternatehypotheses or creative options relevant to one or more of the major fields in adiscipline

d The capacity to engage in independent research or practice in a supervised contexte Critical thinking and analytical skills inside and outside the disciplinef The ability to apply learning from one or more areas outside the discipline

2 Knowledge ofMethodologies and Research

a An understanding of methods of enquiry or creative activity or both in their primaryarea of study that enables the student to

1 evaluate the appropriateness of different approaches to solving problems usingwell established ideas and techniques

ii devise and sustain arguments or solve problems using these methods andNovember 2006

17


iii describe and comment upon particular aspects of current research or equivalentadvanced scholarship in the discipline and how these are relevant to the evolutionof the discipline

3 Application ofKnowledge

a The ability to review present and critically evaluate qualitative and quantitativeinformation to

i develop lines of argumentii make sound judgments in ttccordance with the major theories concepts and

methods of the subjectsof studyiii apply underlying concepts principles and techniques of analysis both within

and outside the discipline andiv where appropriate use this knowledge in the creative process

b The ability to use a range of established techniques toi initiate and undertake critical evaluation of arguments assumptions abstract

concepts and informationii propose solutionsiii frame appropriate questions for the purpose of solving a problem andiv solve a problem or create a new work

c The ability to make critical use of scholarly reviews and primary sources

4 Communication Skills

The ability to communicate information arguments and analyses accurately and reliablyorally and in writing to a range of audiences to specialist and non specialist audiencesusing structured and coherent arguments and where appropriate informed by keyconcepts and techniques of the discipline

5 Awareness ofLimits ofKnowedgeAn understanding of the limits to their own knowledge and ability and an appreciation ofthe uncertainty ambiguity and limits to knowledge and how this might influence analysesand interpretations

6 Professional Capacity AutonomyQualities and transferable skills necessary for further study employment communityinvolvement and other activities requiring

i the exercise of initiative personal responsibility and accountability in both personaland group contexts

ii working effectively with others and

iiibehaviour consistent with academic integrity

November 2006

MASTERSDEGREE

Degree Category MastersDegree


Program Design and Outcome EmphasisA mastersdegree program builds on knowledge and competencies acquired duringrelated undergraduate study and requires more specialized knowledge and intellectualautonomy than a bachelor degree program Much of the study undertaken at the masterslevel will have been at or informed by the forefront of an academic or professionaldiscipline Students will have shown some originality in the application of knowledgeand they will understand how the boundaries of knowledge are advanced throughresearch They will be able to deal with complex issues both systematically andcreatively and they will show independent capacity in addressing issues and problems

Research oriented mastersprograms are typically for graduates of related undergraduateor professional programs in the field or students who have taken bridging studies to equipthem for graduate study in the field the focus is on developing the research analyticalmethodological interpretive and expository skills necessary for doctoral studies or forleadership in society Some programs are thesisbased and require the student to developand demonstrate advanced research skills under supervision Others are course based andrequire students to demonstrate the necessary research analytical interpretativemethodological and expository skills in course exercises

Examples MA programs in the humanities and social sciences MSc programs

Profession oriented mastersprograms normally admit students holding baccalaureatedegrees and provide them with a selection of courses and exercises intended to preparethem for a particular profession or field of practice or if they are already involved in theprofession or field to extend their knowledge base and skills asprofessionalspractitioners

Example MSW Social Work

Preparation for Employment and Further StudyGraduates will have the qualities needed for either further study in the discipline or foremployment in circumstances requiring sound judgment personal responsibility andinitiative in complex and unpredictable professional environments

Length ofProgram

Mastersprograms vary typically from two to six semesters in duration depending on thefield and the speed at which individuals progress through requirements


Normally an undergraduate degree with an appropriate specialization or anundergraduate degree with relevant bridging studies

19

November 2006

Degree Level Standard MastersDegree


1 Depth and Breadth ofKnowledgeA systematic understanding of knowledge and a critical awareness of current problemsandor new insights much of which is at or informed by the forefront of their academicdiscipline field of study or area of professional practice


A conceptual understanding and methodological competence that enables the graduate to

a have a working comprehension of how established techniques of research and inquiryare used to create and interpret knowledge in the discipline

b have a capacity to evaluate critically current research and advanced research andscholarship in the discipline or area of professional competence and

c have a capacity to address complex issues and judgments based on establishedprinciples and techniques

On the basis of that competence has shown at least one of the followinga the development and support of a sustained argument in written form or

b originality in the application of knowledge

3 Application ofKnowledge

Competency in the research process by applying an existing body of knowledge in theresearch and critical analysis of a new question or of a specific problem or issue in a newsetting


The ability to communicate ideas issues and conclusions clearly and effectively tospecialist and non specialist audiences

5 Awareness ofLimits ofKnowledgeA cognizance of the complexity of knowledge and of the potential contributions of otherinterpretations methods and disciplines

6 Professional CapacityAutonomy

a The qualities and transferable skills necessary for employment requiring

i the exercise of initiative and of personal responsibility and accountability andii decisionmaking in complex situations such as employment

b The intellectual independence required for continuing professional development

c The ability to appreciate the broader implications of applying knowledge to particularcontexts

20

November 2006

DOCTORAL DEGREES

Degree Category Doctoral Degrees

21


Program Design and Outcome EmphasisA doctoral program builds on the knowledge and competencies in a field or disciplineacquired during prior study usually at the graduate level Study at the doctoral level is atthe forefront of an academic or professional discipline

Holders of the doctoral degree must have demonstrated a high degree of intellectualautonomy an ability to conceptualize design and implement projects for the generationof significant new knowledge andor understanding and their ability to create andinterpret knowledge that extends the forefront of a discipline usually through originalresearch or creative activity

Preparation for doctoral work may involve course work of varying lengths aimed atcultivating further conceptual depth or breadth It may also involve written and oralexaminations of knowledge and skills in aspects of the discipline prior to authorization toproceed to work on a dissertation

Research oriented doctoral programs focus on the development of the conceptual andmethodological knowledge and skills required to do original research and to make anoriginal contribution to knowledge in the form of a dissertation In some fields aninternship or exhibition component may be required but without diluting the significanceof the dissertation as the primary demonstration of mastery Such programs lead to theaward of the PhD

Examples PhD Psychology PhD Education PhD Music

Practiceoriented doctoral programs are of a more applied nature relate to a professionalor creative activity and where there is an internship or exhibition requirement may alsorequire a dissertation Doctoral programs with an orientation to practice typically involvemore course work than doctoral programs with a more theoretical or disciplinary focusSuch programs lead to the award of a degree designation reflecting the field or disciplineExamples EdD Education Mus Doc Music PsyD Psychology

Preparation for Employment and Further StudyHolders of doctorates will have the qualities needed for employment requiring the abilityto make informed judgements on complex issues in specialist fields and innovation intackling and solving problems

Length ofProgram

A doctoral program is typically three to six years in length depending on the field andthe speed at which individuals progress through requirements

November 2006



Normally a mastersdegree with an appropriate specialization or a mastersdegree withappropriate bridging studies

Degree Level Standards Doctoral Degree

1 Depth and Breadth ofKnowledgeA thorough understanding of a substantial body of knowledge that is at the forefront oftheir academic discipline or area of professional practice


A conceptual understanding and methodological competence that provides the graduatewith the ability toa conceptualize design and implement research for the generation of new knowledge

applications or understanding at the forefront of the discipline and to adjust theresearch design or methodology in the light of unforeseen problems

b make informed judgments on complex issues in specialist fields sometimes requiringnew methods and

c produce original research or other advanced scholarship of a quality to satisfy peerreview and to merit publication

3 Application ofKnowledgeThe capacity toa undertake pure andor applied research at an advanced level andb contribute to the development of academic or professional skill techniques tools

practices ideas theories approaches andor materials


The ability to communicate complex andor ambiguous ideas issues and conclusionsclearly and effectively

5 Awareness ofLimits ofKnowledgeAn appreciation of the limitations of ones own work and discipline of the complexity ofknowledge and of the potential contributions of other interpretations methods anddisciplines

6 Professional Capacity Autonomy

a The qualities and transferable skills necessary for employment requiring the exerciseof personal responsibility and largely autonomous initiative in complex situations

b The intellectual independence to be academically and professionally engaged andcurrent

c The ability to evaluate the broader implications of applying knowledge to particularcontexts

22

November 2006

Criteria that will be used in assessing degree level

The program meets or exceeds the learning outcomes specified above and theinstitution demonstrates how the program meets the standard


a Describe how the proposed program meets the knowledge and skill levelrequirements of the program degree level

23


November 2006

3 Credential Recognition and Nomenclature

Standard


The institution Hurst demonstrate that the programslearning outcomes and standardsare sufficiently clear and at a level that will facilitate recognition ofthe credential byother post secondary institutions professional and licensing bodies and employersWhere appropriate the program courses or curricular elements are designed to

facilitate credential recognition by other postsecondary institutions and by employersboth within the province and other jurisdictions

The name ofa degree should convey longterm meaning the content ofa degree programshould be consistent with the name and the reputation of the institution and ofpostsecondary education in British Columbia should be enhanced by the quality of theoffering Beyond that is the value to graduates ofhaving a professional credentialrecognized by appropriate licensing and accrediting bodies as the basisfor entry topractice

Criteria that will be used in assessing credential recognition and nomenclature

Evidence that the institution is snaking provisions for credential recognition andcourse transfer and that the institution will advise students of any changes tocredential recognition or course transfer in a timely manner

Evidence that employers relevant occupational and professional groups regulatorybodies and other post secondary institutions will recognize the credential and theirassessment of whether the credential will contribute to the professional advancementof the graduate

For programs leading to profession that are subject to government regulation thelearning outcomes and standards and other requirements for graduation take intoaccount the requirements of the relevant regulatory or professional body

There is an appropriate fit between the nomenclature of the credential and the contentof the degree

Degree name is consistent with the Degree Quality Assessment BoardsGuidelineson Naming ofDegrees attached as Appendix 7


a Explain how the design of the program facilitates credential recognition by otherpost secondary institutions Include an analysis of any research undertaken to ensurecredential recognition

24

November 2006


b Where applicable describe the consultations undertaken to ensure the credential andlearning outcomes will be recognized by and meet the standards ofindustryemployers and regulatory licensing or credentialing bodies

In an appendix provide the regulatory licensing or credentialing bodyscurrentrequirements or standards and copies of letters from licensing or regulatory bodiesindicating that the credential and learning outcomes will be recognized

c In some instances regulatory licensing or credentialing bodies do not recognize oraccredit programs but require individuals to meet the certification requirements egcertification exams

If applicable describe the role of the regulatory licensing or credentialing body andthe steps the applicant has taken to ensure individuals will be eligible to meet therequirements of the regulatory licensing or credentialing body

In an appendix provide evidence of the regulatory licensing or credentialing bodyscurrent requirements or standards

d In an appendix provide a copy of the policies and procedures pertaining to notifyingstudents of credential recognition andor transfer

25

November 2006

4 CurriculumProgram Content

Standard


The management structures and methods of the program are well defined and permitdelivery of the quality ofeducation necessary for students to attain the learningoutcomes The institution must demonstrate that the program in both subject matter andlearning outcome standards offers an education ofsufficient breadth and rigour to becomparable to similar programs at the proposed degree level offered by recognizedprovincial national and international post secondary institutions The curriculum mustbe current and reflect the state ofknowledge in the field orfields in the case ofinterdisciplinary and multidisciplinary programs

Criteria that will he used in assessing program content

Approval by the institutionssenior academic governance bodyie SenateEducation Council or equivalent or an academic planning and priorities committeeto which it has delegated authority and which has sufficient qualifications to ensurethat the curriculum is current and reflects the state of knowledge in the field and theneeds of the field in practice

If an external review is undertaken before submission of the degree proposal theexternal review committeesreport is included in an appendix

Learning outcomes and standards for the program demonstrate how graduates will beprepared with a sound basis in theory as well as the intellectual communications andother skills necessary to be effective in the workplace upon graduation and to remaincurrent in their field

Courses provide exposure to increasingly complex theory and in programs with anapplied or professional focus the application of that theory to practice in the field

The program has sufficient breadth ie courses outside the professional or main fieldof studies some of which are free electives andor an appropriate balance ofprofessional and liberal studies

Time allotments assigned to the program as a whole and to components in theprogram are appropriate to the stated learning outcomes

The type and frequency of evaluations of student learning are commensurate with thestated learning outcomes and provide appropriate information to students about theirachievement levels

Levels of student achievement for successful course completion and the graduationrequirements for the proposed program are appropriate to the learning outcome goals

26

November 2006

3

3


g

Provide full course outlines in an appendix

27


and degree level standard and allow for confirmation that a student is progressingnormally through the program

For degrees with in applied or professional focus work experiences fieldplacements etc have appropriate articulated learning outcome goals and a method forjoint instructor and employer evaluation leading to the assignment of a grade

a Describe the program structure and the length of the program number of credithours and proposed student evaluation

b Identify the prescribed set of core and prerequisite courses Course descriptionsincluded in the full program proposal should be of the level of detail found in theacademic calendar

c Identify which courses already exist at the institution and which new courses will beimplemented as a result of the program

d Explain how the course and curriculum requirements will contribute to the intendedgoals of the program

e If an external review of the proposed program is undertaken before submission of thedegree proposal in an appendix please provide a copy of the external reviewcommitteesreport

I Where work experience or field placements are a component of the program describethe institutionsplans to develop placement opportunities for students and the level ofsupport the institution will extend to students seeking placements

Where applicable describe the anticipated outcomes of the work experience or fieldplacement associated with the program how the experience offered will provide theopportunity to put the stated learning outcomes into practice and how the studentswill be evaluated during their placements

November 2006

5 Learning MethodologiesProgram Delivery

Standard

Learning methodologies are the methods ofdelivery drat will be used to achieve thedesired learning outcomes at the degree level standard and at an acceptable level ofquality The institution must demonstrate that it has the expertise and resources tosupport the proposed method ofdelivery and ensure its effectiveness In some cases itmay be more appropriate for the instiuuion to demonstrate that it has realistic plat toput the necessary expertise and resources in place

Criteria that will be used in assessing learning methodologiesprogram delivery

The delivery methodsand quality assurance policies are appropriate to coursecontent the students involved and the proposed learning outcotes

Evidence that the institution has the expertise and resources to support the proposedmethod of delivery both human and material that support the program and itsstudents and provides processes for students feedback and ensures its effectivenessor demonstrates a viable plan to put the necessary expertise and resources in place

Where applicable policies pertaining to technologybased computerbased andwebbased learning and modes of delivery ensure

student and faculty preparation and orientationi reliable and sufficient course management systems

accessible technical assistance for students and facultyappropriate hardware software and other technological resources and media andwellmaintained and current technology and equipment


a Explain the learning methodologymethodologies to be used


Indicate which of the following methodologies will be incorporated into the learningenvironment of the new degree program and how they will be used

Experiential learning eg cooperative education clinical work term orsimulated work experienceDistance education

Independent study computer assisted instruction etcLectures labs tutorials andOther

b In an appendix include any policies pertaining to technologybased computerbasedor webbased learning and modes of delivery

28

November 2006

6 Admission and TransferResidency

Standard


The institution should demonstrate that the programs is designed to provide flexibleadmission and transfer arrangements Where appropriate the program courses orcurricular elements are designed to facilitate credit transfer by other post secondaryinstitutions both within the province and otherjurisdictions

Note The British Columbia Council on Admissions and Transfer administers the

British Columbia Online Transfer Guide that provides information on course or programarticulation agreements between institutions

Institutions are encouraged to contact the British Columbia Council on Admissions andTransfer early in the development of new degree program proposals for information onadmissions and transfer in British Columbia

httpwwwbccatbccapubsassoc0500htnt

Criteria that will be used in assessing admission transfer and residency

Evidence that the institution has clearly established policies and procedures onadmissions consistent with the level of the degree program including policies ondirect entry and mature students and will inform students of these provisions and anychanges to these provisions

The institution has admission requirements for the proposed program that areconsistent with the postsecondary character of degree granting organizations andwhere appropriate ensure appropriate forms of assessment of prior learning foradmission to programs

Evidence that the institution has clearly established policies and procedures ontransfer consistent with the level of the degree program and will inform students ofthese provisions and any changes to these provisions

The institutionspolicy on admissions and transfer indicates a willingness to considerapplicants applying to undergraduate graduate and professional programs from anypostsecondary institutions

Appropriate residency requirements

29

November 2006



a Describe the admission requirements for this program In an appendix provide acopy of the policies and procedures on admissions

b Describe the existing practice or proposed policy for the granting of transfer credit forequivalent courses andor programs completed at other institutions that will satisfythe requirements for this program Include a copy of the policy in an appendix

c Institutions are encouraged to have in place a policy and process that providesstudents credit for previous postsecondary studies so that they are not required torepeat courses they have previously completed If applicable describe the policy andpractice for granting credit toward meeting requirements for this program based onprior learning assessment If applicable include a copy of the policy in an appendix

d Describe the residency requirements for this program Specify the minimum numberof credits that must be completed at the institution awarding the degree

e Describe existing arrangements or plans for establishing articulation agreements sothat transfer credit will be granted for courses completed in this program towardmeeting requirements for credentials offered at other institutions

Note information on a provincial transfer friendly course outline form for voluntaryuse by postsecondary institutions is available on the British Columbia Council onAdmissions and Transfer web site httn wwwbccatbccaoutline

30

November 2006

7 Faculty

Standard


The institution must demonstrate that it has the human resources necessary to developand deliver a quality degree program In some cases it may not be feasible for aninstitution to hire faculty until it receives program approval In these cases theinstitution should provide the specificfaculty selection criteria that will be used to ensurenew faculty hires have the necessary qualificationsfor the degree level being offered andprogram being proposed

Criteria that will be used in assessing faculty qualifications

Faculty and instructors are in sufficient numbers and with the appropriate credentialto develop and deliver the degree level being offered and program being proposedStaff resources must be sufficient to ensure the coverage required within thediscipline for the proposed program

Evidence that the institutionspolicies and practices on the type of academicappointment of faculty eg continuingregular appointments are appropriate tosustain the degree program

The institution has satisfactory policies pertaining to faculty that address issues suchas the protection of academic freedom academicprofessional credentials the regularreview of faculty performance the means of ensuring that faculty knowledge of thefield is current teaching supervision and student counselling loads and professionaldevelopment of faculty

Faculty have an appropriate level of scholarly output andor research or creativeactivity for the baccalaureate or graduate program involved

For degrees with an applied or professional focus faculty maintain continuingacademic and professional competence and accreditation in their discipline or fieldappropriate to the specific degree program

Faculty teaching graduate courses will normally have the terminal academic degreecredential in the field in which they are teaching

Faculty providing doctoral supervision are expected to have an active researchprogram in their discipline or field of study

For any proposal involving human research a statement that a Research Ethics Boardis in place

31

November 2006


For any proposal involving animal research a statement that an Animal CareCommittee is in place


a Please indicate the number of faculty and instructors present and future and otherstaff required to mount this program and the qualifications required

Provide an enrolment plan for the length of the program eg fouryear projection ofcumulative enrolment that accounts for projected attrition and indicates the numberof staff faculty technical teaching assistants etc assigned to the program

Indicate if any of these positions will be new to the institution In cases where newfaculty will be hired provide the specific faculty selection criteria that will be used toensure new faculty hires have the necessary qualifications for the disciplinary andspecialty areas and degree level being offered

b Provide any policies pertaining to faculty and instructors specific to the programincluding

policies that define the minimum academicprofessional credentials required offaculty teaching all courses in the program and where appropriate serving asmembers of thesis or project examining committees

protection of academic freedom

review of faculty performance

teaching supervision and student counselling loads and

professional development of faculty

c Provide the institutionspolicies and practices on the type of academic appointmentof faculty specific to this program eg continuing or regular appointments andtemporary appointments

d In an appendix provide the curriculum vitae of faculty members and instructorsspecific to the program that demonstrates that they possess an appropriate balancefrom amongst the following requirements

Academic credentials appropriate to the degree level being offered Facultyteaching baccalaureate degrees with an applied or professional focus have anappropriate balance of professional qualifications academic credentials andexperience

Any required academic andor desired professional credentials

A demonstration of current involvement in research and professional activity thatrepresents an appropriate balance of research and intellectual leadership in thediscipline and the field of specialization

32

November 2006

8 Program Resources

Standard


The institution must demonstrate that it has the physical learning and informationresources both startup and development needed to assure a program ofacceptablequality These include facilities equipment library resources laboratories computingfacilities shops specialized equipment etc and cooperative work placements where thisis a component of the program In some cases an institution may not be able to ensureresources are in place until after it receives program approval In these cases theinstitution may bringlanyard a proposal based on a realistic planfor putting theappropriate resources in place as an alternative to demonstrating that all resources arein place

Criteria that will be used in assessing program resources

Evidence that the physical plant equipment technology and support servicesadequately support the organizationseducational and student activities

Evidence of reasonable student and faculty access to learning and informationresources such as library databases computing classroom equipment and laboratoryfacilities sufficient in scope quality currency and type to support students andfaculty in the program

Evidence of commitment to provide and maintain necessary learning and otherresources specific to the program and to supplement them as necessary to meetstandards applicable to the field

Submission of any agreements with other institutions where resources and servicesare shared


a Describe the resources that will be required to mount this program includingi library resources onsite library resources relevant to the degree program area for

faculty and students and other library access such as webbased or inter libraryarrangements Include the number of holdings print relevant to the field ofstudy and number of holdings electronic ie program specific databases

ii computers and computer accessiii classrooms laboratories and equipmentiv existing and shared resources at the institution or at other institutions that will be

used to offer the program andv additional resources that will be required to offer this program

33

November 2006

b Provide the intended implementation schedule for the new program and evidence ofthe appropriateness of the schedule given the timing of the proposal and readiness ofthe institution to offer the program

c Institutions must demonstrate that they have the necessary resources to mount andsustain a quality program at the proposed degree level or a realistic plan for puttingthe appropriate resources in place subsequent to program approval Describe theinstitutionsplans for renewal and upgrading of leaming and information resources

34


November 2006

9 Program Consultation

Standard

The institution Writ demonstrate that it has consulted appropriate individuals andorganizations in the development of the program proposal

Criteria that will be used in assessing program consultation

Evidence that the institution has done due diligence in consulting with employersstudents program advisory committees other postsecondary institutions and anexternal review by academics within British Columbia and other jurisdictions etc

Evidence of support for the program and in cases where consultation feedback resultsin negative comments a clear response addressing those comments


35


a Provide a list and brief explanation of the nature of the consultations that haveoccurred in the development of the degree program

b Attach all written comments both positive and negative fromrelevant employersrelevant professional associationsprogram advisory committeesother British Columbia institutions this will include comments provided throughthe peer review process on the Post Secondary Institution Proposal Systeminstitutions outside British Columbia

experts in the proposed field of study andexternal academic consultants

c If there are other individuals or groups that have been involved describe their roles inthe collection and evaluation of information leading to the development andsubmission of this proposal

d Include a list of anticipated employment destinations for graduates of this program

November 2006

10 Program Review and Assessment

Standard

36


In order to ensure the ongoing currency of the program and the quality of its learningoutcomes the institution must show evidence that a program review and assessmentprocedure is in place

Criteria that will be used in assessing program review and assessment

Evidence ofa formal institutionally approved policy and procedure for the periodicreview of programs ie formative and ongoing reviews and a summative reviewnormally every five years against published standards that includes the followingcharacteristics

A selfstudy undertaken by faculty members and administrators of the programbased on evidence relating to program performance including strengths andweaknesses desired improvements and future directions For example a selfstudy takes into account

o the continuing appropriateness of the programsstructure admissionsrequirements method of delivery and curriculum for the programseducational goals and standards

o the adequacy and effective use of resources physical technological financialand human

o faculty performance including the quality of teaching and supervision anddemonstrable currency in the field of specialization

o that the learning outcomes achieved by studentsgraduates meet the programsstated goals the degree level standard and where appropriate the standards ofany related regulatory accrediting or professional association

o the continuing adequacy of the methods used for evaluating student progressand achievement to ensure that the degree level standards have been achievedand

o where appropriate the graduate employment rates graduate satisfaction levelemployer satisfaction level advisory board satisfaction level studentsatisfaction level and graduate rate

An assessment conducted by a panel consisting of experts external to theinstitution that normally includes a site visit a report of the expert panel assessingprogram quality and recommending any changes needed to strengthen thatquality and an institutional response to the recommendations in the report

A summary of the conclusions of the evaluation made publicly available

November 2006 3

r The program review ensures that the program remains consistent with theorganizationscurrent mission goals and longrange plan



a Indicate the policiesprocedures that are planned for ensuring adequate depth andbreadth and frequency of ongoing review and assessment once the program has beenimplemented

In an appendix provide copies of the formal approved policy and procedures forperiodic review of programs that address the program review elements described inthe criteria above

37

November 2006

Program Proposal

Part I Executive Summary 2 3 pages in length

38


B Submission Format Institutions with Exempt Status

An institution with exempt status has demonstrated that it has rigorous ongoing programand institutional quality assessment processes both internal and external The ExemptStatus Criteria and Guidelines pros ide that when an institution has been granted exemptstatus at a certain degree level proposals submitted for new degree programs at that levelare posted for public review and comment for 30 days Following the 30day reviewperiod proposals proceed directly to the Minister for approval unless the Minister hasconcerns and refers it to the board

If the institution is approved by the Minister of Advanced Education for exempt status forthe degree level proposed the Program Proposal should consist of an executive summaryand the documentation that the institution used in the internal program approval process

The executive summary must present in a succinct manner the purpose of the proposaland a summary of the key objectives and outcomes of the proposed degree program andmust include the following information

a An overview of the organizationshistory mission and academic goals

b Proposed credential to be awarded including the level and category of the degree andthe specific discipline or field of study

c Location

d Facultyies or schoolsoffering the proposed new degree programe Anticipated program start date

0 Anticipated completion time in years or semesters

g A summary of the proposed program includingAims goals andor objectives of the proposed programAnticipated contribution of the proposed program to the mandate and strategicplan of the institution

Linkages between the learning outcomes and the curriculum design an indicationwhether a work experiencework place term is required for degree completionand if so a description of the purpose and role of the work experience within theprogram

potential areassectors of employment for graduates and or opportunities forfurther studyDelivery methodsProgram strengthsAn overview of the level of support and recognition from other postsecondaryinstitutions and relevant regulatory or professional bodies where applicable and

November 2006


plans for admissions and transfer within the British Columbia postsecondaryeducation systemRelated programs in the institution or other British Columbia post secondaryinstitutions Indicate rationale for duplication if any

h Name title phone number andemail address of the institutional contact person incase more information is required

Part 2 Documentation used in the institutionsinternal program approval process

Include the documentation that was submitted to the institutionsinternal governingbody

Appendices

Appendicesif any should be attached to the submission on the Post SecondaryInstitution Proposal System as separate documents Appendices will not be posted onthe public web site

Information that the institution considers proprietary should be included inappendices to the program proposal Examples of proprietary information may includereferee letters letters of support which contain personal information such as names andaddresses and financial information

Appendices should indicate the appendix number and appendix name

39

November 2006

APPENDICES

Degree Program Review Criteria and Guidelines


I Operational Guidelines for the Review of Outofprovince Institutions Operatingin British Columbia through Branch Operations and

2 Operational Guidelines for OutofProvince Institutions Operating in BritishColumbia through Collaborative Arrangements

3 Operational Guidelines for Recognizing Prior Assessment and Accreditations

4 Use of External Experts

5 Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Policy Board Members and ExternalExperts

6 Workflow Diagrams Degree Approval Process

7 Degree Quality Assessment Board Guidelines on Naming of Degrees

40

November 2006



Attendance Date Tt C

NAME PRESENT ABSENTl Baron Jackie


3 Cserepes Dana

4 Erickson Shawn

5 Fleming Rob or VP Academifrep A6 Goedbloed Dana

7 McConiII Casey


9 Morris Susan

10 Mott Maxine

11 Samwald Elaine

12 Royal Wendy


14 Tritchew Parnell

15 Wade Tally

16 Warfield Katie

17

18

19

Guests

Metzger Karen Recorder



Attendance Date Tt C

a z4 fr - Kwantlen Polytechnic University Agendas/2007... · Degree Proposal Assessment Committee...

Documents

Transcript of a z4 fr - Kwantlen Polytechnic University Agendas/2007... · Degree Proposal Assessment Committee...