A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn

13
A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA presented at: HIRDLS Science Team Meeting Wednesday January 30th, 2880 NCAR, Boulder, CO

description

A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA presented at: HIRDLS Science Team Meeting Wednesday January 30th, 2880 NCAR, Boulder, CO. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn

Page 1: A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn

A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and

CloudSat

by

Brian H. Kahn

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA

presented at:

HIRDLS Science Team Meeting Wednesday January 30th, 2880

NCAR, Boulder, CO

Page 2: A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn

Thin cirrus retrievals in the tropics via AIRS

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10240230220210200190180

TC (K)

0.0 ≤ τ < 0.1 0.1 ≤ τ < 0.25 0.25 ≤ τ < 0.5 0.5 ≤ τ < 0.75 0.75 ≤ τ ≤ 1.0

240

230

220

210

200

190

180

0.100.080.060.040.020.00

Normalized Frequency

0.0 ≤ τ < 0.1 0.1 ≤ τ < 0.25 0.25 ≤ τ < 0.5 0.5 ≤ τ < 0.75 0.75 ≤ τ ≤ 1.0

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.012010080604020

De ( ) µm

0.0 ≤ τ < 0.1 0.1 ≤ τ < 0.25 0.25 ≤ τ < 0.5 0.5 ≤ τ < 0.75 0.75 ≤ τ ≤ 1.0

• Retrieval based on Yue et al. (2007), J. Atmos. Sci.

• Results presented in Kahn et al. (2007), Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.

Page 3: A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn

Thin cirrus + RHI retrievals via AIRS

• RHI calculation following Gettelman et al. (2006), J. Climate

• Results presented in Kahn et al. (2007), Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0150100500

RHic (%)

(B)

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

100

0.0 < τ ≤ 0.1 0.1 < τ ≤ 0.25 0.25 < τ ≤ 0.5 0.5 < τ ≤ 0.75 0.75 < τ ≤ 1.0

( ) A

240

230

220

210

200

190 ( ) C

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10150100500

RHic (%)

( ) D

Page 4: A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn

Motivation – Inter-hemispheric differences in UT RHI

Gettelman et al. (2006), J. Climate

• What are the causes and implications?

Cirrus nucleation + aerosol differences, dynamic variability reflected in T(z), variability in q(z)? Others?

Page 5: A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn

An illustration of AIRS RHI + CloudSat/CALIPSO cloud profiles

CloudSat/CALIPSO ground track

Cirrus observed by CloudSat/CALIPSO

Products used:• RHI (AIRS)• Cloud profiles (CSat + CAL)• IWC (CSat)• Cloud type (CSat)

Page 6: A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn

AIRS RHI: Vertical structure, higher RHI @ cloud top

RHI limited to: (1) q > 15 ppmv(2) T ≤ 243 K(3) Quality Flag = “Best” or “Good”

Page 7: A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn

AIRS RHI most useful in broken/thin Cirrus & clear sky

Purple: CirrusBlue: AltostratusRed: CumulusDark Red: Nimbostratus

Page 8: A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn

AIRS RHI & CloudSat IWC anti-correlated

• Variability from scene-to-scene

• Information about cirrus formation/evolution?

Page 9: A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn

RHI & IWC anti-correlated for 5 days of data

• Anti-correlation of IWC and RHI consistent with some in situ aircraft spirals (e.g. MIDCIX campaign)

• 25–50% of Cirrus with IWC ≤ 1–10 mg m3 is supersaturated

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

100

2.52.01.51.00.50.0

RHI

0.1–0.3 0.3–1.0 1–3 3–10 10–30 30–100

IWC bins ( mg m3 )

Page 10: A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn

RHI dependent on cloud/clear sky & season

• All distributions are global (July 2006 and January 2007)

• Note January ‘07 has smaller dynamic range in RHI

• CALIPSO RHI closer to clear sky: thin Cirrus produces low RHI bias

• Kahn et al. (2007), Atmos Chem. Phys. Discuss.

Page 11: A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn

Hemispheric & seasonal variance in RHI

SH Cloudy Sky RHI

• RHI less variable in SH

• Similar differences for CALIPSO-centric view of clouds & clear sky

• What controls the variability?

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

100

PDF

2.52.01.51.00.50.0

RHI

CSat_All_SH_normdjf CSat_All_SH_normjja CSat_All_SH_normmam CSat_All_SH_normson

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

100

PDF

2.52.01.51.00.50.0

RHI

CSat_All_NH_normdjf CSat_All_NH_normjja CSat_All_NH_normmam CSat_All_NH_normson

NH Cloudy Sky RHI

Page 12: A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn

Hemispheric & seasonal variance in T and RHI

NH 1 Temperature variability

• Width of PDFs between T and RHI correspond: dynamical control of RHI PDF?

• Similar view using CALIPSO-observed clouds & clear sky

• BUT: nice correspondence not true in SH (not shown)

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

100

PDF

2.52.01.51.00.50.0

RHI

CSat_All_NH_normdjf CSat_All_NH_normjja CSat_All_NH_normmam CSat_All_NH_normson

NH Cloudy Sky RHI

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

100

Normalized PDF

1086420

1–sigma Temperature (K)

sig_NH_ta_all_pres_djf_cld sig_NH_ta_all_pres_jja_cld sig_NH_ta_all_pres_mam_cld sig_NH_ta_all_pres_son_cld

Page 13: A view of UT clouds and relative humidity using AIRS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat by Brian H. Kahn

Take Home Messages & (Near) Future Work

• Combined A-train observations reveal global-scale, long-term insights

• AIRS cirrus + RHI PDFs reveal physical relationships consistent with other measurements

• Hemispheric/seasonal differences modulate RHI distributions within cloud and clear sky

• T variability appears to have asymmetric hemispheric correspondence with RHI PDFs

Important to constrain dynamical influences to detect other controlling factors in RHI

• Continued investigation into linkage between T and q variability, and seasonal/hemispheric characteristics of RHI PDFs

Acknowledgments: AIRS, CloudSat, CALIPSO science, algorithm and processing teams, NASA post-doctoral program (NPP), and NASA radiation sciences program for funding support