A Short Range FMCW Radar System with Low Computational ... · (Frequency Modulated Continuous...
Transcript of A Short Range FMCW Radar System with Low Computational ... · (Frequency Modulated Continuous...
A Short Range FMCW Radar System with Low
Computational Complexity
Hyeokjin Lim and Seongjoo Lee Department of Electrical Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea
Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Abstract—In this paper, a short range FMCW (Frequency
Modulated Continuous Wave) radar system with low
computation complexity is proposed. In order to improve
the frequency linearity, the proposed FMCW radar system
adopts the digital frequency modulation with the counter
and look-up tables for sine and cosine waves in an FPGA
(Field Programmable Gate Array). In order to reduce the
complexity of hardware, it utilizes the arc cosine rom in
time domain for calculating the distance instead of FFT. The
total RMSE of the distance is less than one meter. The
suggested FMCW radar is applicable to unmanned vehicle,
train, ship, exploration robot, military tank and obstacle
sensor.
Index Terms—radar, fast fourier transform, frequency
modulated continuous wave
I. INTRODUCTION
Radar is a device which sends out electromagnetic
wave energy and can measure the distance between the
transmission antenna and the target object with a value
which calculates the arrival time of the reflected wave
after being reflected from the target object [1]. Radar
systems are not only used as a navigation device in
airplanes and ships but also used in diverse fields such as,
calculating large scale tank in the heavy chemical
industry, climate observation, marine safety facility and
vehicle collision prevention [2]-[6]. Especially, the
demands of unmanned vehicle radar technology have
increased [7]-[8]. While normal anti-air radar is used for
detecting objects which are hundreds of kilometers away,
the radar used for unmanned vehicle needs to detect
objects within 200m. The unmanned vehicle radar
systems have many methods, including FMCW
(Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave), pulse, CW
(Continuous Wave) and spread spectrum method. FMCW
method is the most widely used methods due to
economical reason. The analog FMCW method radar
with VCO (Voltage Controlled Oscillator) needs to have
increased in the number of kHz per nanosecond to find
the distance delay. However, it is hard to induce the
frequency increase in VCO and high quality VCO is
expensive and complicated actuation circuit.
In this paper, the proposed FMCW radar system with
low computation complexity suggested using counter in
an FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array), rather than
Manuscript received June 18, 2015; revised November 17, 2015.
VCO, to generate the FMCW wave. Furthermore, the
proposed one does not use the FFT (Fast Fourier
Transform) for distance measurement algorithm with
FMCW radar systems and also reduced the complicated
hardware by using arc cosine ROM (Read only Memory)
table.
In Section 2, the basic theory of FMCW radar and the
calculation of distance are described. In the 3rd section,
the proposed FMCW radar system is analyzed and
designed. In Section 4, the results of distance calculation
are shown. Finally, the conclusions are reached in Section
5.
II. BASIC THEORY OF FMCW RADAR AND
CALCULATION OF DISTANCE AND SPEED
Radars are divided into pulse and continuous wave
depending on the modulation method. A pulse radar
system transmits pulses with small width and measures
the distance by using the delay time of the signal wave,
reflected from the object. It is called the amplitude
modulation method. CW radar systems are a method
which calculates the difference of the frequency signal
while signals are transmitted and reflected. It measures
the distance with the modulated amount of the
transmitted frequency by modulating the transmitting
frequency per time. A conventional FMCW radar system
is composed as shown in Fig. 1.
VCO
AMPPowerdivider
Tx
LNAMixer
LPFADCDSP(FFT)
Cos fc
Cos fc
RxRF mixer
IF mixer
Figure 1. A conventional FMCW radar system block diagram.
The system is consisted of transmission, receipt and
antenna part. Except the part where the transmission part
transmits the signal by modulating the frequency, there is
not much structural difference with the normal
continuous wave radar system, but as the FMCW radar
system’s capability is determined by the linearity which
modulates the frequency, there is a big difference in
structuring the transmission part.
International Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering Vol. 4, No. 4, August 2016
©2016 Int. J. Electron. Electr. Eng. 370doi: 10.18178/ijeee.4.4.370-373
The conventional FMCW radar uses VCO in order to
modulate the frequency of the transmission signal. VCO
modulates the frequency according to the input voltage.
But the output frequency is not linear for the input
voltage. PLL (Phase Locked Loop) is utilized in order to
convert the frequency linearly. The transmission signal
that comes out by modulating the frequency is released
through one antenna after amplification. The reflected
signal from the object is received by the same antenna
and it comes back to the mixer, after going through the
circulator. Although the sum and the difference of
transmission and receipt signals are output on the mixer,
the summed frequency is removed through the LPF (Low
Pass Filter) and the difference is only input as ADC
(Analog Digital Converter). The input signal is shown as
the frequency domain with the FFT. The extracted
difference frequency is converted into the distance
information from the frequency spectrum. The FMCW
radar systems have the advantages of having smaller
transmission power, size, and simple structure for the
pulse radar. But there are disadvantages such as, isolation
between the transmission and receipt, phase noise and
linearity according to the broadband frequency
modulation. It needs reinforcements for problems.
The difference frequency between the transmitted
signal and the reflected signal, from the FMCW radar
changes according to the distance. Normally, the
frequency modulation of the transmission signal uses
linearly chopping form or sawtooth wave. In the case of
calculating the distance, it uses sawtooth wave most of
the time, but as the sawtooth wave is not continuous in
modulation and in order to extract the distance. It needs
to create modulation wave with different slopes. It uses
chopping wave. Fig. 2 shows the diagram of linearly
chopping wave modulation.
τ
fc
fc +Δf
fb
Ts
Freq.
Time
Transmitted signalReceived signal
Figure 2. A triangular pulse and difference frequency of FMCW radar of the fixed target.
The slope (fm) that modulates into chopping form is the
value that divided modulation broadband (Δf) by
modulation period (TS) and the frequency difference of
the transmission and receipt signal of after the delay of τ
can be expressed as the below (1).
2b
S S
f f Rf
T T c
(1)
The chopping form modulation creates a point where
the difference frequency is 0 when it switches to decrease
frequency modulation after linearly increase frequency
modulation during the modulation period, it is ignored as
it is regarded as a very small section. The extracted
difference frequency can be converted into distance
information by using (1), and the organization is as
follows:
2
S bT f c
Rf
(2)
For the fixed object, the difference in the frequency
between the increase and decrease modulation section is
the same, but the difference frequency for the moving
object creates a Doppler frequency succession. It presents
the difference of the Doppler frequency per modulation
section. The Fig. 3 shows the transmission and receipt
frequency and difference frequency of the moving object.
τ
fc
fc +Δf
fb
Ts
Freq.
Time
Transmitted signalReceived signal
Figure 3. A triangular pulse and difference frequency of FMCW radar of the moving target.
Each section indicates the speed information according
to the Doppler frequency succession and the distance
information according to the time delay and it can extract
both information through simultaneous equation of
increase (fup) and decrease (fdown) sections as follows:
up r df f f (3)
down r df f f (4)
2
up down
r
f ff
(5)
2
down up
d
f ff
(6)
2
S rT f c
Rf
(7)
III. PROPOSED FMCW RADAR SYSTEM
The proposed FMCW radar system is divided into the
transmission, receipt and antenna part as shows in Fig. 4.
The antenna part is not different from the conventional
FMCW radar system. The transmission part generates the
FMCW wave by using the counter in an FPGA rather
than VCO. Because it consumes about 6.6ns for the
International Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering Vol. 4, No. 4, August 2016
©2016 Int. J. Electron. Electr. Eng. 371
absolute delay of 1m depending on the (8), it is
oversampled to 150MHz corresponding 6.6 ns per 1 step.
2d
RT
c (8)
Td is absolute delay, R is distance and c means the speed
of light (299792458 m/s). The transmission signal is as
1 2cos(2 ( ( )) )Tx f f t t (9)
Transmission signal is transmitted through DAC
(Digital Analog Converter). The delayed receipt signal is
1 2cos(2 ( ( )) ( ))Rx f f t t (10)
Receiving signal multiplies the transmitted signal’s (9)
and the receiving signal’s (10) to calculate the frequency
difference. The cosine signal is received through ADC.
With the low pass filter, it filters the high frequency
signals and finds the difference frequency of lower
frequency. In the case of a conventional FMCW radar
system, the signal frequency is calculated with FFT. But
the proposed FMCW radar system utilizes arc cosine
ROM table in order to reduce the complexity of the
hardware. The distance is calculated with the frequency
signal which gained from the arc cosine table and (7).
Figure 4. The proposed FMCW radar system.
The performance of distance sensor is measured with
respect to the RMSE (Root Mean Square Error). If the
transmission SNR is 35 and 40 dB, the result is shown in
Table I-Table IV and Table V-Table VIII, respectively.
The total RMSE of the distance is less than one for the
area, Doppler, transmission SNR and distance.
TABLE I. THE RMSE RESULT OF AREA AND DOPPLER FOR
TRANSMISSION SNR 35DB AND DISTANCE 1M
Area/Doppler 0 Hz 300 Hz 450 Hz 600 Hz
1.0 m2 0.009 0.008 0.009 0.009
1.5 m2 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008
2.0 m2 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.007
TABLE II. THE RMSE RESULT OF AREA AND DOPPLER FOR
TRANSMISSION SNR 35DB AND DISTANCE 5M
Area/Doppler 0 Hz 300 Hz 450 Hz 600 Hz
1.0 m2 0.044 0.046 0.042 0.042
1.5 m2 0.039 0.037 0.037 0.040
2.0 m2 0.038 0.034 0.036 0.037
TABLE III. THE RMSE RESULT OF AREA AND DOPPLER FOR
TRANSMISSION SNR 35DB AND DISTANCE 10M
Area/Doppler 0 Hz 300 Hz 450 Hz 600 Hz
1.0 m2 0.088 0.084 0.081 0.082
1.5 m2 0.073 0.069 0.066 0.070
2.0 m2 0.061 0.063 0.059 0.061
TABLE IV. THE RMSE RESULT OF AREA AND DOPPLER FOR
TRANSMISSION SNR 35DB AND DISTANCE 15M
Area/Doppler 0 Hz 300 Hz 450 Hz 600 Hz
1.0 m2 0.112 0.121 0.114 0.110
1.5 m2 0.100 0.085 0.089 0.088
2.0 m2 0.087 0.089 0.083 0.087
TABLE V. THE RMSE RESULT OF AREA AND DOPPLER FOR
TRANSMISSION SNR 40DB AND DISTANCE 1M
Area/Doppler 0 Hz 300 Hz 450 Hz 600 Hz
1.0 m2 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.007
1.5 m2 0.007 0.006 0.007 0.007
2.0 m2 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.007
TABLE VI. THE RMSE RESULT OF AREA AND DOPPLER FOR
TRANSMISSION SNR 40DB AND DISTANCE 5M
Area/Doppler 0 Hz 300 Hz 450 Hz 600 Hz
1.0 m2 0.034 0.033 0.034 0.032
1.5 m2 0.032 0.031 0.030 0.034
2.0 m2 0.032 0.031 0.030 0.033
TABLE VII. THE RMSE RESULT OF AREA AND DOPPLER FOR
TRANSMISSION SNR 40DB AND DISTANCE 10M
Area/Doppler 0 Hz 300 Hz 450 Hz 600 Hz
1.0 m2 0.060 0.056 0.060 0.057
1.5 m2 0.054 0.057 0.054 0.055
2.0 m2 0.056 0.056 0.054 0.055
International Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering Vol. 4, No. 4, August 2016
©2016 Int. J. Electron. Electr. Eng. 372
follows in
expressed as
(9) from the measurement time t.
(10) for delay time τ.
IV. THE MESUREMNT RESULT OF THE DISTANCE
TABLE VIII. THE RMSE RESULT OF AREA AND DOPPLER FOR
TRANSMISSION SNR 40DB AND DISTANCE 15M
Area/Doppler 0 Hz 300 Hz 450 Hz 600 Hz
1.0 m2 0.077 0.075 0.073 0.074
1.5 m2 0.069 0.070 0.073 0.070
2.0 m2 0.067 0.064 0.065 0.062
V. CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, the short range FMCW radar system with
low computational complexity is proposed. Because the
VCO’s linearity affects directly the accuracy of
measurement distance in FMCW radar, the VCO’s
frequency linearity is very important to measure distance.
In this research, in order to improve the frequency
linearity, the proposed FMCW radar system used the
FMCW wave which increases by 6.6kHz per 1 step with
the counter in an FPGA. In order to reduce the
complexity of the hardware, it utilized the arc cosine
ROM for the distance. The suggested FMCW radar is
applicable to unmanned vehicle, train, ship, exploration
robot, military tank and obstacle sensor.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the National Research
Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea
government (MOE) (No.2013R1A1A2064733) and also
by R&D program funded by IITP & MSIP
(B01261510760001002, “Development of non-powered
technology combined with ambient RF energy harvesting
and Backscatter data transfer”), and CAD tools are
supported by IDEC in Korea.
REFERENCES
[1] M. I. Skolnik, Radar Handbook, 3th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill,
2008. [2] L. Giubbolini, “A microwave imaging radar in the near field for
anticollision (MIRANDA),” Trans. on M.T.A.T., vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1891-1900, September 1999.
[3] J. H. Zhang, G. S. Liu, H. Gu, and W. M. Su, “Coding step FM continuous wave signal’s apply in vehicles collision avoidance
radar system,” ACTA Electronica Sinica, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 943-
946, July 2001. [4] J. H. Jeong, et al., “A study on the development of the active radar
reflector with enhanced function,” Journal of the Korea Industrial Information System Society, vol. 83, pp. 38-43, 2000.
[5] L. Giubbolini, “A multistatic microwave radar sensor for short
range anticollision warning,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 49, pp. 2270-2275, 2000.
[6] C. H. Bae, “The study on vehicle radar technology trends,” Korea: Electronic Communications Trends Analysis, vol. 21, no. 4, 2006.
[7] Wang, Shuiying, et al., “Shader-Based sensor simulation for
autonomous car testing,” in Proc. 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2012.
[8] T. Wang, X. Jingmin, and Z. Nanning, “A method integrating human visual attention and consciousness of radar and vision
fusion for autonomous vehicle navigation,” in Proc. IEEE Fourth
International Conference on Space Mission Challenges for Information Technology, 2011.
Hyeokjin Lim was born in Mokpo, Korea in
1988. He received his B.S and M.S degrees in Electrical Engineering from Sejong University,
Seoul, Korea, in 2012 and 2014, respectively. He is working for a PhD degree at Sejong
University. His current research interests
include SoC design for digital spectrum analyzer and touch screen devices.
Seongjoo Lee received his BS, MS, and PhD
degrees in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from Yonsei University, Seoul,
Korea, in 1993, 1998, and 2002, respectively. From 2002 to 2003, he was a senior research
engineer at the IT SoC Research Center and
the ASIC Research Center, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. From 2003 to 2005, he was a
senior engineer in the Core Tech Sector, Visual-Display Division, Samsung Electronics
Co. Ltd., Suwon, Korea. He was a research professor at the IT Center
and the IT SoC Research Center, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea from 2005 and to 2006. He is currently an Associate Professor in the
Department of Electrical Engineering at Sejong University, Seoul, Korea. His current research interests include SoC design for high-speed
wireless communication systems and image processing systems.
International Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering Vol. 4, No. 4, August 2016
©2016 Int. J. Electron. Electr. Eng. 373