A RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 COMPARING PLATINUM AND TSR … FIRST Trial Pujade.pdf · What is TSR-042 ?...
Transcript of A RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 COMPARING PLATINUM AND TSR … FIRST Trial Pujade.pdf · What is TSR-042 ?...
FIRST TrialFirst-line ovarian cancer treatment with Niraparib plus TSR-042
ENGOT-ov44/GINECO/First trial
A RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 COMPARING
PLATINUM AND TSR-042 (PD-L1 INHIBITOR) FOLLOWED BY
NIRAPARIB AND TSR-042 MAINTENANCE THERAPY VERSUS
ADAPTATIVE STANDARD PLATINUM-BASED TREATMENT
IN PATIENTS WITH STAGE III OR IV CANCER OF THE OVARY,
FALLOPIAN TUBE OR PERITONEUM
ENGOT model C (id NOVA & PRIMA)
Sponsor: TESARO 1L OvCaStudy (3000-01-0005)
ENGOT group leader: GINECO
What is TSR-042 ?
1185P - Safety, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic profile of TSR-042, an anti–PD–1 monoclonal antibody, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors
1185P - Safety, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic profile of TSR-042,
an anti–PD–1 monoclonal antibody, in patients (pts) with advanced solid
tumors
Conclusions
TSR-042 is safe and well tolerated, with a safety profile expected for an agent
targeting the PD-1 pathway, with evidence of linear PK and sustained target
engagement at administration intervals up to 6 weeks. TSR-042 showed
clinical benefit in heavily pretreated pts in the initial phase 1 study
Sachev JC et al, Ann Oncol (2017) 28 (suppl_5)
TSR-042 is an anti-PD-1 immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) humanized
monoclonal antibody (mAb) generated using SHM-XELTM technology 2
that binds with high affinity to PD-1
PARPi + PD-L1/PD1 developmentin first-line OC
Carboplatin-paclitaxel
+ PARPi
Control arm Add or stratify ?bevacizumab
Biological Stratification factor:
Experimental armmonotherapy
+ PD-L1/PD1i
Experimental armbitherapy + PARPi & PD-L1/PD1i
NoneBRCA/HRD status/wt
SOLO1PAOLA1PRIMA
JAVELIN100IMaGYN050
FIRST Trial: Overview of the Adaptive Design
SOC*
Study Schema
SOC* SOC* + 042
1 2 3
Oral PBO NIR NIR+042
Pt population: • Stage III/IV epithelial non-mucinous OC• Inoperable disease & NACT planned,
macroscopic residual disease following primary debulking surgery
Initial Randomization1:1:2
Main
tenance T
x
SOC: Standard chemotherapy with paclitaxel/carboplatin ±bevacizumab and bevacizumab maintenance per local
Stratification factors• tRCA/HRD status (test to be determined)• Concurent use of bevacizumab• ECOG PS OR REGION?
Niraparib dose: 200 mg once dailyNo PBO for 042screening for first cycle; randomization at 2nd cycle
Primary endpoint: PFS
FIRST Trial: objectives
Primary
To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with Stage III or IV epithelial non-mucinous ovarian cancer treated with platinum-based therapy and TSR-042 followed nirapariband TSR-042 maintenance therapy or with standard platinum-based therapy
Progression will be defined by RECIST v1.1 as assessed by investigator with sensitivity analysis by a blinded independent central review committee (BIRC).
Key Secondary Overall Survival (OS), Time to Subsequent Second Treatment TSST, PRO’s, safety and tolerability
Secondary ORR, TFST, PFS2, RECIST v. 1.1 or CA-125 PFS
Exploratory To retrospectively evaluate biomarkers related to ovarian cancer, PARP inhibition and PD-1 therapy (e.g. DNA
repair pathways, immune checkpoint pathway, etc.) To assess population pharmacokinetics (PK) and immunogenicity (TSR-042 only) and measure PK parameters
for niraparib and TSR 042
FIRST Trial: Overview of the Adaptive Design
SOC*
Initial Study Schema
Design
1st Event: SOLO1 is positive in gBRCAmut pts (Q1/2 2018)
SOC* SOC* + 042
1 2 3
1 2 3 1
gBRCAmut Non-gBRCAmut(no change)
Study Design Following Change in SOC
Oral Placebo
NIR NIR+042
Main
tenance T
x
Pt population: • Stage III/IV epithelial non-mucinous OC• Inoperable disease & NACT planned,
macroscopic residual disease following primary debulking surgery
Initial Randomization1:1:2
2 3
FIRST Trial: Overview of the Adaptive Design
SOC*
Initial Study Schema
Design
1st Event: SOLO1 is positive in gBRCAmut pts (Q1 2018)
Scenario 2
Pos in HRD+ pts
SOC* SOC* + 042
1 2 3
1 2 3 1
HRD+ HRD-
Scenario 1
Pos in all pts
No change to gBRCAmut pts regardless of
PAOLA1/PRIMA
gBRCAmut Non-gBRCAmut(no change)
Study Design Following Change in SOC
Scenario 3:
Neg in all pts
Oral Placebo
NIR NIR+042
Main
tenance T
x
Pt population: • Stage III/IV epithelial non-mucinous OC• Inoperable disease & NACT planned,
macroscopic residual disease following primary debulking surgery
Initial Randomization1:1:2
2 3
2nd Event: PAOLA1 and/or PRIMA Results (H1 2019)
1 2 3
Non-gBRCAmut Non-gBRCAmut
1 2 3
21 3 21 3
FIRST Trial: Overview of the Adaptive Design
Randomization ratio (Arm 1: Arm 2: Arm 3) Initial: 1:1:2 (to increase patient interest) Final: 1:1 (SOC versus Arm 3)
ITT population (all randomized/treated pts) versus modified ITT population (randomized/treated final control pts)
ITT rationale: gold standard in randomized trials
mITT rationale
– When SOC changes, SOC control arm will be adapted and pts in the obsolete control arm will be notified and discontinued from study treatment to pursue new SOC
It will be required a maximum of 700 patients to detect a difference of median PFS of 6 months with an HR of 0.70 (up to 0.73 according to the scenario), power 90% and global alpha of 0.05
Timelines• ENGOT Group feasibility questionnaires: Nov 2017
• Steering Committee for protocol comments and aproval: Dec 2017
• FPI: June 2018