A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison...

20
Page 1 A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie 1 , Luat To 1 , Bob Moss 2 , Andrew Davies 2 , and Kenneth Tabiner 1 1 The Dow Chemical Company, 1881 West Oak Parkway, Marietta, GA 30062 2 Dow Hyperlast, Station Road, Birch Vale, Derbyshire SK22 1BR, UK PMA Conference, Savannah, GA, April 20, 2009

Transcript of A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison...

Page 1: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 1

A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers

Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2, and Kenneth Tabiner1

1 The Dow Chemical Company, 1881 West Oak Parkway, Marietta, GA 30062 2Dow Hyperlast, Station Road, Birch Vale, Derbyshire SK22 1BR, UK

PMA Conference, Savannah, GA, April 20, 2009

Page 2: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 2

OCN NCOHO OH

OCN NH

O O NH

NCO

O O

OCN NCO

+

0.25 moles 3.02 moles

+

Quasi-Prepolymer Component

2.52moles

Polyol Component

HO OH HOOH

0.75 moles 1 mole

+

+ Catalyst, de-aerator etc.

Quasi MDI Approach

Page 3: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 3

Consequence of the Quasi Prepolymer Arrangement

PROS v Low viscosity liquids at room temperature v Low temperature, multiple-component

processing v Low temperature mold and postcure v Freedom to adjust ratios in-situ to achieve

a wide hardness range v Benign chemistry requiring less strict

health and safety controls v High throughput processing enables

casting of huge parts

CONS v Excess monomeric MDI may shorten

shelf life v Conversion of large amount of NCO into

urethane often produces significant amount of heat, which might cause excess shrinkage if not carefully managed

v Catalysts with high selectivity that favor urethane conversion are often required

v Slightly inferior physical properties were reported

Page 4: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 4

Chain Extender @ RT~300ºF

Quasi @ 176ºF Full Prepolymer

@ 212~250ºF

Quasi @ 176ºF Full Prepolymer @ 212~250ºF

Oven Melting

1

Quasi @ <120ºF

Full Prepolymer @ 158~176ºF

Quasi @ <120ºF

Full Prepolymer @ 158~212ºF

Polyol @ ~120ºF

BDO @ RT

4

Casting Station

Mold Preheat Oven Postcure Oven

2

5 3

Energy Saving of Quasi Systems

Our survey of processors using both quasi and full prepolymers found an average saving of 25% in energy cost

Page 5: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 5

Full Prepolymer Approach

Page 6: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 6

Consequence of the Full Prepolymer Arrangement

PROS

v Reduced amount of monomeric isocyanate content extends product shelf life and minimizes worker exposure

v Lower NCO reduces amount of heat generation during chain extension, thus improving product consistency and quality

v Does not require special catalysts v Narrower molecular weight distribution

leads to improved phase separation and physical properties

CONS v Higher viscosity. Some of them are solid

or semi-solid at room temperature v Higher processing temperature, mold

temperature and postcure temperature v Require multiple grades to cover a wide

range of hardness, which may cause machine down time during change over

Page 7: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 7

Interests in the quasi MDI approach have been on the rise

v New and pending regulations on TDI and MOCA in both developed (EU and NA) and developing countries (such as China) have put more restrictions in using the chemicals, which incurs additional cost in processing such chemicals

v Skyrocketing raw material cost and globalization in recent years create an urgency to save in ways we do business

v Green chemistry is gaining traction due to environment, health and safety consciousness. There have been efforts in employing benign chemistry, cutting carbon footprint (reducing energy consumptions) and increasing renewable content

v Our acquisition of Hyperlast allows Dow to supply both quasi and full prepolymers.

We are interested in sharing with you what we learn and offering you an alternative as a supplier of both technologies

Page 8: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 8

Prepolymer Systems Used in the Study

Raw Materials Chemical Name Supplier

Diprane 53 Quasi MDI polyester prepolymer Dow Chemical

Hyperlast 100 Quasi MDI polyether prepolymer Dow Chemical

Diprane T840/90A TDI polyester full prepolymer Dow Chemical

Diprane T840/80A TDI polyester full prepolymer Dow Chemical

Hyperlast T140/90A TDI polyether full prepolymer Dow Chemical

Hyperlast T170/80A TDI polyether full prepolymer Dow Chemical

MOCA 4,4’ methylene bis(2-chloroaniline) Anderson Development

BDO 1,4 Butanediol BASF

Page 9: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 9

General Physical Properties

MDI Quasi vs. TDI

PerformanceHyperlast

100

Hyperlast T140/90

AHyperlast

100

Hyperlast T170/80

A Diprane 53

Diprane T840/90A Diprane 53

Diprane T840/80A

Isocyanate MDI TDI MDI TDI MDI TDI MDI TDI

Curative BDO/Polyol MOCA BDO/Polyol MOCA BDO/Polyol MOCA BDO/Polyol MOCA

Hardness, Shore A 90 90 80 80 90 90 80 80

Tensile Strength, psi 4785 5420 4350 4560 5655 8345 5510 7085

Elongation at Break, % 450 650 450 675 550 725 550 750

Tear Strength,D624 Die C, pli 457 450 297 375 537 551 400 480

Compression Set, Method B, % 30 27 30 45 25 28 30 32

Bashore Rebound, % 52 56 58 68 36 36 42 41

Page 10: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 10

0 5 10 15 200

20

40

60

80

100

120 (a)  Diprane  53  Diesel  T840/90A  Diesel  Diprane  53  Gasoline  T840/90A  Gasoline  Diprane  53  Cyclohexanone  T840/90A  Cyc lohexanone

Weig

ht  Gain

 (%)

Days  In  Solvents0 5 10 15 20

50

60

70

80

90

100 (b)

 Diprane  53  Diesel  T840/90  Diesel  Diprane  53  Gasoline  T840/90  Gasoline  Diprane  53  Cyclohexanone  T840/90  Cyclohexanone

Remain

ing  Hardn

ess  (%)

Days  in  Solvents

Solvent Resistance MDI Quasi versus TDI Full Prepolymers

Page 11: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 11

Hyperlast  100 T140/90A Diprane  53 T840/90A0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Abras

ion  Lo

ss  (mm

3 )

Abrasion Resistance MDI Quasi versus TDI Full Prepolymers

Page 12: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 12

0 5 10 15 20 250

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

Tensile  St

rength

 (psi)

Days  in  95 oC  Water  

 Hyperlast  100  T140/90A

Moisture Resistance MDI PTMEG Quasi versus TDI PTMEG Full Prepolymer

Page 13: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 13

Summary

In comparison to TDI based elastomers, quasi MDI systems can be formulated to provide

Ø adequate mechanical properties Ø similar resistance to petrochemicals Ø slightly improved abrasion resistance Ø superior hydrolytic stability

Customer Field Evaluations

Fork Lift Wheels Pipeline Pigs

Page 14: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 14

Wheels and Rollers Account for 50% of the High Performance Cast Elastomer Market

Subjected to repeated deformations under load at a certain frequency

Conversion of Mechanical Energy to Heat

Heat Buildup Causes Failures

v Fatigue cracking

v Blow out

v Wearing, Tearing and Cut

Demand of the Market v Increased Load Bearing Capability

v Increased Speed

v Cost-Effective Solution

20%

30%

35%

10%

5%

Mec. Goods Wheels Rollers Mining Other

Page 15: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 15

Wheel Dynamometer Study

Performed by Stellana USA

v Press on tires at 10’x5’x6.5’ were made from Diprane 53 at 85A and 90A hardness

v Press on tires based on full MDI and TDI prepolymers at the same size in market place were purchased and tested side by side

v Tests were conducted at a speed of 2.5 miles/hour while varying the load

v Maximum load and run time at the failure were recorded

Page 16: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 16

2300

2400

2500

2600

2700

2800

2900

3000

3100

3200

Diprane 85A Full MDI 85A Full TDI 85A Diprane 90A

Load

at F

ailu

re (l

bs)

7.5

8.0

8.5

9.0

9.5

10.0

10.5

11.0

11.5

Run

Tim

e (h

our)

Maximum LoadRun Time

Load Bearing Capability MDI Quasi versus TDI, MDI Full Prepolymers

Page 17: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 17

26 inch in diameter, 1 inch thick 85A elastomer disc

Pipeline Pigs

Page 18: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 18

(a) Conventional TDI after one pass (b) Quasi MDI after two passes (C) Low Free TDI after two passes

Field Evaluation •  Dry transmission line at 80 miles long with black powder buildups (iron sulphite and hydrogen sulphite )

•  Pigs were made of conventional TDI with PTFE fillers, low free TDI and quasi MDI

•  Tests were conducted at a speed of 5 mils/hour

•  Wear and tear, amount of material moved by the pigs were evaluated after cleaning

Page 19: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 19

Conclusions

v MDI quasi systems offer a number of processing advantages over systems based on full prepolymers. §  Multiple-component processing at low temperature and low viscosity §  Cover a wide range of hardness via change of component ratios in-situ on a cast

machine v MDI quasi systems can bring additional savings to processors in energy cost,

engineering controls due to health and safety concerns, and machine down time due to change over (improved productivity)

v MDI quasi systems can be formulated to have adequate performance comparable to full prepolymer based systems. Certain properties of quasi systems can be advantageous when compared to TDI full prepolymer based systems, such as abrasion and moisture resistance

v MDI quasi systems can be used in a wide range of applications. In some applications, MDI quasi systems can even demonstrate an edge over other urethanes.

Page 20: A Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full · PDF fileA Performance Comparison of MDI Quasi Systems and TDI Full Prepolymers Rui Xie1, Luat To1, Bob Moss2, Andrew Davies2,

Page 20

Thank You

Stellana USA Trico Poly Systems

Gerhard Mueller Paul Fitzgerald Juan Gaytan