A new common radiocommunication system for Public Safety authorities.
-
Upload
aniyah-truelock -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of A new common radiocommunication system for Public Safety authorities.
A new common radiocommunication system for Public Safety authorities
Swedish Emergency Management Agency (SEMA)
Reduce vulnerability and increase emergency management capability in Sweden
Agenda
• RAKEL update• User needs• Selection of TETRA• TETRA compared with GSM/CDMA/UMTS (3G)
RAKEL update
Facts about Sweden
• Population: 9 million• Area: 450.000 square km• 290 local authorities• 21 county councils
Stage 1 (jan 2006): Skåne, Blekinge, Kalmar
Stage 2 (dec 2006): Gävleborg, Kronoberg*, Stockholm, Södermanland, Uppsala, Västmanland
Stage 3 (juli 2007): Halland, Västra Götaland
Stage 4 (juli 2008): Jönköping, Västernorrland, Östergötland
Stage 5 (dec 2008): Dalarna, Värmland, Örebro
Stage 6 (juli 2009): Jämtland, Västerbotten
Stage 7 (juli 2010): Gotland, Norrbotten
Roll-out in 7 stages
From South to North2005-2010
1 April 2004: Procurement completed, contract awarded to: SAAB, NOKIA, Eltel networks
8 April 2004: Award decision appealed
20 January 2005: Swedish Supreme Administrative Court denies appeals
26 January 2005: SEMA takes over contract for roll-out of RAKEL
1 January 2006: SEMA starts the final test period
• Co-operation started with supplier to start roll-out
• Radio planning and site acquisition finished for the first stage and ongoing for stage two
• NMC, Switches and some base stations installed
Activities at the moment
• Preparations for user accession to system have begun: fleet mapping, local organization, education
• Government users and certain local authorities and county councils have decided to use RAKEL
• More users groups may be invited to join
Activities at the moment
• Police• Coastguard• Customs• Local Rescue Services• Emergency Healthcare and Ambulance Services• Armed Forces• Local and Regional Crisis Management• Swedish Prison and Probation Service • The Swedish Radiation Protection Authority
• National Rescue Services (Maritime Administration, Civil Aviation Authority)• Electricity Distribution Companies
Users
In extraordinary events
User needs
Process Process
Data
Communication
Information
Organization
Technology
UserCooperatio
n
User in focus
Operative Flow
Common Demands
Secure – Efficient – Easy to use• Robust • High level of security – encryption• High capacity for many users at the same time• Quick access• Priority for emergency calls• Direct mode• Ability to make individual and group calls• Flexible call groups• Traffic managed by communication central• Easy to use
Functional requirements
Technical / functional specification
• ~1000 shall demands
• ~500 should demands
• >95 % of all requirements fulfilled
Future development for RAKEL
• New service and function needs will arise
• Responsibility for developing methods and tactics is within the user organisations
• RAKEL is the common platform
Selection of TETRA
Competitors (only showing the system supplier)
• Nokia (TETRA)
• Motorola (TETRA)
• Siemens (TETRA)
• OTE/Marconi (TETRA)
Winner
• Nokia (TETRA)
Why?
• Highest score in the technical evaluation
• Low price
• Altogether (technical and commercial) the highest score
TETRA compared with GSM/CDMA/UMTS
Missing functionality, critical for the end user
• Priority
• DMO
• Encryption
• SecurityMutual authenticationLogging of management event
• Dispatcher functionalityDynamic groupsCall authorized by dispatcher
More examples (not functionality)
• Less expensive
• All ready in use by other public safety organisations
• Developed in cooperation with public safety
• Cross boarder communication
• Several manufactures of mobile equipment
• ???
www.rakel.info
Questions? Comments?
Contact us!