A MODEL OF LEARNING OBJECT CENTERED ON THE PROCESS TEACHING-LEARNING
-
Upload
thiago-reis -
Category
Documents
-
view
749 -
download
4
description
Transcript of A MODEL OF LEARNING OBJECT CENTERED ON THE PROCESS TEACHING-LEARNING
© 2013 ICECE March 03 - 06, 2013, Luanda, ANGOLA
VIII International Conference on Engineering and Computer Education 77
A model of learning object centered on the process teaching-learning
Thiago Reis da Silva1, Rommel Wladimir de Lima
2, Carla Katarina de Monteiro Marques
3, Hugo
Henrique de Oliveira Mesquita4, Roberto Douglas da Costa
5, Rodrigo Medeiros de Azevedo
6, Selma
Márcia Pontes Teixeira da Rocha7
1 Thiago Reis da Silva, Master in Computer Science at the Graduate Program in Computer Science – UERN/UFERSA. 2 Rommel Wladimir de Lima, Teacher Graduate Program in Computer Science – UERN/UFERSA. 3 Carla Katarina Marques de Monteiro, Teacher Graduate Program in Computer Science – UERN/UFERSA. 4 Hugo Henrique Oliveira Mesquita, Bachelor of Computer Science at State University of Rio Grande do Norte – UERN. 5 Roberto Douglas da Costa, Master in Computer Science at the Graduate Program in Computer Science – UERN/UFERSA and teacher Institute Federal of
Education, Science and Technology of Rio Grande do Norte – IFRN. 6 Rodrigo Medeiros de Azevedo, Bachelor of Computer Science at State University of Rio Grande do Norte – UERN. 7 Selma Márcia Pontes Teixeira da Rocha, Master in Computer Science at the Graduate Program in Computer Science – UERN/UFERSA.
Abstract This article presents the advantages of modeling
a Learning Object using the SCORM standard, based on
tools centered on the teaching/learning based on
pedagogical theories and statements. For this, the teaching
tools: Map Content and Dependency Map, which is
developing a methodology for planning disciplines, are
thought of as models for learning objects. Thus, the
representation of these tools as Learning Objects enables its
greater sharing and reuse.
Index Terms Learning Objects. SCORM. Planning of
Teaching-Learning.
INTRODUCTION
With the constant advances of Information and
Communication Technologies, the Distance Learning over
the Internet, has been suggested as a potential solution to
bring knowledge to more distant places [4]. An example is
the Learning Objects (LO) [22], which according to [20]
matches any resource to support learning, for example,
animation software, a Web page, an image, among others.
This generic definition promotes a variety of forms of
creations and uses of LO in the teaching/learning [14]. But,
these multiplicities of ways to use their reuse difficult,
especially with regard to other LO [18]. In this sense, the
process of developing LO, must follow rules of
standardization and pedagogical features.
In this context, this article aims to present the potential
benefits promoted the development of a model of OA, the
use of teaching tools in conjunction with the Sharable
Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) standard [1].
For this, the pedagogical tools will be used proposal in [9],
Content Map and Dependency Map, whose creation process
is a planning methodology for discipline, focused on the
process of teaching/learning.
LEARNING OBJECTS AND THE STANDARD
SCORM
LO is a digital resource that can be used as an aid for
teaching-learning and it has the ability to be reused in
various contexts in order to facilitate the acquisition of
knowledge [20].
In this context an LO is any resource digital that can be
reused to support teaching [21]. Therefore, it is understood
that the LO favor a new conception of teaching/learning,
supported by technology, characterized by promoting the
construction of knowledge through interaction. In this
perspective, the increasing use of LO activities to support
the teaching-learning demanded several initiatives to
standardize the specification, construction and identification
of these [5].
In the case of standardization of LO were defined
several recommendations concerning the metadata
cataloging and characterizing the LO and also
recommendations on how these can be encapsulated OA and
how their content can be browsed [23].
Currently the standard in evidence [1] is SCORM
created by the Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL), which
presents itself as a reference model of LO shareable. The
focus of SCORM is the auto-learning, i.e., the student
interacts exclusively with the material without interference
from other players in sequencing. The SCORM incorporates
various specifications of LO and thus becomes compatible
with various Virtual Learning Environments (VLE) [17].
In this perspective, the use of LO in teaching has not
only advantages, there problems and/or disabilities related to
their development. According to [6] and [15], among the
major problems faced in the creation of LO include:
a) Navigation Structure: LO in the navigation
structures are not clearly defined, and the concepts
and relationships are not always represented a way
to identify the best way to navigate between them;
b) Transcript written media to electronic media: in
developing the content of OA is very difficult to
find a structured way of transcribing a content
written by an electronic content, enabling its reuse
in different contexts;
© 2013 ICECE March 03 - 06, 2013, Luanda, ANGOLA
VIII International Conference on Engineering and Computer Education
78
c) Disability pedagogical: in general, the development
of LO have been more important than the technical
perspective outlook pedagogical;
d) Integration with VLE: when the academic
community, industry and government failed to
reach an agreement on what standard to use in the
development of OA, although the standard SCORM
is in evidence [1];
e) Presentation of LO: the generic definition of what
may be an OA provides a wide variety of shapes
and designs of the present educational content,
which makes it difficult reuse.
To address these problems, this model uses two
pedagogical tools that work the process of teaching and
learning. The next section presents these tools.
CONTENT MAP AND DEPENDENCE MAP
According to [14], the tool Content Map (CM),
presented in [11], aims to strengthen the teaching/learning
process by providing a more meaningful content [2] for
teacher and student. For the teacher, the tool has a planning
methodology that guides the development of the same MC
and promotes the discipline of planning, collaborating with
the learning process. Figure 1 shows an example of an CM
containing the first level of viewing the contents program
illustrated in Figure 2.
FIGURE. 1
EXAMPLE OF A CM. FONT: ADAPTED AND EXCERPTED FROM
[19].
In CM, relations between concepts are hierarchical, with
content more introductory occupying the top of the chart and
the most complex driving to the base [10]. This way of
viewing a relationship is based on the fact that a more
complex content needs or rely on content simpler with
whom it relates. Assim, a relação entre o conteúdo de duas
indica ao aluno que ele precisa entender os conceitos do
conteúdo mais fácil de ser capaz de compreender a
informação no conteúdo mais complexo.
To provide a graphic display of the discipline syllabus
or course, the CM has to be created. For this, a planning
methodology guides the teacher in the development of CM
and promotes planning discipline.
FIGURE. 2
EXAMPLE PROGRAMMATIC CONTENT FOR THE DSICPLINA IN
OPERATING SYSTEM. FONT: ADAPTED AND EXCERPTED FROM
[19].
Based on the concepts of Concept Maps [11], CM
strengthens the learning process of students through the
graphical visualization of the course syllabus or course. The
Planning Methodology supporting the teacher in creating the
discipline, assisting in the development of CM consists of a
set of interactions where the teacher answers the questions
asked by the tool. At the end of the interactions result is that
CM is then displayed by the teacher [16].
The other tool proposed by [9] and presented in [8] is
the Dependency Map (DM). The DM is a pedagogical tool
consists of a set of Educational Objectives, presented
graphically, and interrelated through Bloom's Taxonomy [3].
The DM generally consists of an educational objective
and a set of behaviors required to achieve this goal. Both the
educational goal as the behaviors needed to achieve it, are
defined according to the existing categories in Bloom's
Taxonomy.
© 2013 ICECE March 03 - 06, 2013, Luanda, ANGOLA
VIII International Conference on Engineering and Computer Education
79
The highest level of the DM represents the educational
objective, belonging to a particular class of taxonomy,
defined by the teacher to explain what he expects of students
in relation to content. After this first level, the DM shows the
dependence relationship between that initial goal and any
number of behaviors, the lower class, which can contribute
to achieving the initial goal. This dependency relationship is
repeated, with the DM may contain as many levels as
necessary, to achieve the simplest class of Bloom's
Taxonomy or until it reaches a behavior that does not require
dependencies. Figure 3 illustrates an example of a DM.
FIGURE. 3
EXAMPLE OF A DM. FONT: ADAPTED AND EXCERPTED FROM
[19].
MODEL DEVELOPED
The creation of an LO is a task that requires intense
work and as important as the knowledge about the
development of computational tools, you get a sense of how
the construction of knowledge occurs [22]. However,
organizing this knowledge to produce something attractive
to apprentices can become a complex task considerably. In
this perspective, we propose a model of LO developed based
on pedagogical tools CM and MD, following the SCORM
standard, as implemented in the VLE Modular Object-
Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment (MOODLE) [13].
The proposed model does not address the evaluation
activities for LO parts of students, teachers and other users.
The proposed LO model is centered on SCORM
standard, this standard helps provide specifications for the
reusability of object and, in this context, the focus of the
model developed here is the production and reuse of LO.
Therefore, the development process, this OA model,
consists of two steps, which aim to organize and systematize
the construction of the model, the step of importing and
exporting.
In step export contains OA in its entirety, ready to be
used and reused in VLE in accordance with SCORM. These
LO SCORM under represent the Sharable Content Object
(SCO), with all the technical requirements necessary to
satisfy the requirements of interoperability and reusability of
LO on the internet. To meet the technical requirements, the
LO must be packaged and labeled, following the SCORM
standard. This includes metadata that describe: (a) package
content and their individual basic components, (b) the
organization and the order in which digital resources are to
be delivered and (c) the related physical files, such as
images, files eXtensible Markup Language (XML), among
others.
The import step is the step where the teacher can
perform the import model. This step is required when the
teacher check for possible adaptations of the model created.
For the OA is exported, the teacher makes planning and
discipline determined will be as the composition of the
learning unit based curriculum (Figure 1). During the
planning of the learning unit, i.e., the subject or course, the
LO will be produced , consisting of a set of HyperText
Markup Language (HTML) pages, images, files like PPT,
PDF, audio and video among others. Consequently, the
teacher makes the export files produced to meet the
proposed framework. The model will be exported in a ZIP
file. The encapsulation of the model in the ZIP file assures
the availability and access to search in VLE.
The ZIP package consists of two elements: the first
element is an XML file - imsmanisfest.xml, known as
manifest, which describes the structure of the object and its
content; the second element, are multimedia files
themselves, for our context, these files are text, HTML
pages, PDF, DOC, and others.
FIGURE. 4
MODULE DEVELOPED. FONT: ADAPTED AND EXCERPTED FROM
[19].
© 2013 ICECE March 03 - 06, 2013, Luanda, ANGOLA
VIII International Conference on Engineering and Computer Education
80
To assist in these two steps, a module was developed in
Moodle (Figure 4) to export the courses developed in the
form of LO, based on SCORM, to fasten the main features
thereof that are interoperable and reuse of content.
This module is compliant with SCORM 2004
generating a content package type ZIP that contains the
manifest file, file with the information from OA and other
files that are SCORM standards. These files are compressed
according to the Content Aggregation Model [1], which
makes reusable LO in any VLE compatible with SCORM.
After the step of exporting the model is generated. In
Figure 5, there is illustrated the metadata stroke according to
the program contents shown in Figure 2. For this, it must be
tested, in order to make sure your content package is correct
and working properly. To test the metadata created by the
LO model, we use the tool Reusable E-Learning Object
Authoring and Delivery (Reload Editor) [12]. It is possible
to run and play functionality SCORM content package
without the need to include it in VLE.
FIGURE. 5
METADATA PRODUCED BY THE MODEL OF LO. FONT: ADAPTED
AND EXCERPTED FROM [19].
The intent of the model presented in this paper is LO,
with the help of the Concept Maps, provide a mechanism
that shows the relationships between content, enabling the
perception of verbal and visual hierarchical relationships
between the main concepts of the content covered.
Advantages of Model
According to [7], to promote the reuse of educational
content is necessary to encourage its standardization in order
to function properly in any VLE. Standardization will allow
easy reuse, portability of content created, the standardization
of processes of creation, and management of learning
content.
As noted in Section about Learning Objects and the
Standard SCORM the lack of a homogeneous structure in
the presentation of LO complicates its reusability and can
harm your understanding. In this sense, the use of
presentation templates followed by CM and DM, and
provides a unique way to display the LO model provides a
framework for standardization of presentation, without
restricting the ability to generalize the same.
Besides worrying about the content presented, the
modeling of LO in the context of CM and DM also seeks to
improve the learning process by helping the teacher in
planning discipline at the same time provides a common
model for these objects. With this, the LO becomes an
instrument in aid the teacher in planning their discipline,
based on pedagogical theories tools used by CM and DM.
With the use of these theories, it is expected that this new
model of LO may also contribute to the learning process.
Thus, the standardization of LO in the SCORM
standard, using the pedagogical tools CM and DM will serve
as the base structure for teachers, students and other
stakeholders to plan, build new LO and reuse within a single
structure, other LO. These LO present all contents
(information) in a graphical format so that the process of
teaching/learning becomes easier. The OA model focuses
primarily assist the teacher in planning a course or
discipline.
Thus, among the advantages that this model of LO, can
bring to the teaching / learning process, we can highlight
[16]:
a) An integrated planning methodology based on
Educational Objectives (methodology of creating
the CM and DM);
b) Using pedagogical theories already consolidated
(Meaningful Learning and Bloom's Taxonomy);
c) Standardization of model presentation of the LO
(the object will be displayed graphically, following
the model of CM and DM);
d) Increased reusability of LO (the model used enables
integration between objects. For example, certain
content in an MC can reference another LO).
Thus, this model of LO aims to reduce the difficulties
mentioned earlier in section about the LO, through its
modeling as CM and DM. These tools will be used as
cognitive strategies for acquisition and representation of
knowledge and/or information during the drafting process
and reuse of Learning Objects and the Standard SCORM for
planning activities of a course, module, among other
activities.
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
Whereas an LO may be a digital resource, the main idea
of this paper is to develop a model of LO standardized using
the concepts that define an LO so that it meets mainly the
© 2013 ICECE March 03 - 06, 2013, Luanda, ANGOLA
VIII International Conference on Engineering and Computer Education
81
characteristic of reusability. For this work, we adopted the
concept of LO defined by [21]. Regarding the educational
aspects, the development of LO with pedagogical theories
allows students to have a common understanding of a
specific area and can develop new models agreed in
collaboration with other students and teachers making the
process of teaching/learning multidisciplinary. Constructing
and reconstructing knowledge and skills, combining the
benefits and advantages of using LO and its development
technologies with the experience needed in the processes of
teaching and learning. In this context, the teachers of the
various areas addressed proposed LO can use to enhance
your teaching methodology.
An initial test in Moodle, which is in compliance with
SCORM, proved the feasibility of the model allows adapting
the learning environment to the needs of students. As future
work we intend to test the model proposed in educational
scenarios more realistic, for example, their application in the
planning of lessons by different teachers in different areas
and also its applicability in the classroom.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank CAPES and FAPERN for issuing
research grants, equipment and financial support for carrying
out the same.
REFERENCES
[1] ADL. Advanced Distributed Learning. Disponível em:
<http://www.adlnet.org>. Acesso em: out. 2012.
[2] Ausubel, D. P. Psicología educativa: un punto de vista cognoscitivo.
Trad. Roberto Helier Domínguez. Trillas: México, 1976.
[3] Bloom, B. S.; Engelhart, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl,
D. R. Taxionomia de objetivos educacionais – domínio cognitivo.
Globo: Porto Alegre – RS, 1997.
[4] Botelho, C. A.; Pimentel, E. P.; Senger, H.: Stiubiener, I.
Personalização em Sistemas de Gerenciamento da Aprendizagem em
Conformidade com o Padrão SCORM. In: Anais do XX Simpósio
Brasileiro de Informática na Educação – SBIE. Florianópolis – SC.
2009.
[5] Dutra, R.; Tarouco, L.; Passerino, L. Utilização de Objetos de
aprendizagem abertos SCORM para dar suporte à avaliação formativa.
In: Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação - RBIE, v18, n3,
p.59-69. 2010.
[6] Gonçalves, L. Ambiente Computacional para geração de Learning
Objetcs no padrão SCORM a partir de conteúdos organizados através
de Mapas Conceituais. 2005. Disponível em:
<http://guaiba.ulbra.tche.br/documentos_cursos/sistemas/tcc_estagio/t
ccI_2005_1/ArtigoTCC1_Lucio.pdf>. Acesso em: mar. 2012.
[7] Kratz, R. A.; Pinto, S. C. C. S.; Scopel, M.; Barbosa, J. Fábrica de
Adequação de Objetos de Aprendizagem. In: Revista Brasileira de
Informática na Educação. v. 15, n. 3, p. 25-38. 2007.
[8] Lima, R. W.; Fialho, S. V. Dependence Maps: A Methodology for
Subject Planning and Learning Assessment in Virtual Learning
Environments. In: iciw, pp. 66-71, Third International Conference on
Internet and Web Applications and Services, 2008.
[9] Lima, R. W.; Fialho, S. V. Introducing assessment into the teaching-
learning process of Distance Education using discipline planning. In:
9th IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education, Bento
Gonçalves - RS. 2009.
[10] Lima, R. W.; Fialho, S. V. Mapa de Conteúdos e Mapa de
Dependências: ferramentas para um planejamento com base em
objetivos educacionais. Revista de Exatas e Tecnológica - RETEC,
v.2, p.10, 2011.
[11] Novak, J. D.; Cañas, A. J. The theory undelying concept maps and
how to construct them. Techinical Report IHCM CmapTools. Florida
Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. 2006.
[12] RELOAD. Reusable eLearning Object Authoring and Delivery.
Disponível em: <http://www.reload.ac.uk>. Acesso em: out. 2012.
[13] Silva, R. S. Moodle para autores e tutores. Novatec. São Paulo – SP. 2011.
[14] Silva, T. R.; Lima, R. W.; Costa, R. D.; Marques, C. K. M. Uma
proposta de padronização de Objetos de Aprendizagem com base em
Objetivos Educacionais. In: Escola Potiguar de Computação e suas
Aplicações – EPOCA. Natal - RN. 2011.
[15] Silva, T. R.; Lima, R. W.; Mesquita, H. H. O.; Marques, C. K. M.;
Costa, R. D.; Rocha, S. M. P. T. O uso de Teorias Pedagógicas no
desenvolvimento de Objetos de Aprendizagem. In: IV Seminário
Pesquisa em Educação a Distância – SEPEAD. Florianópolis – SC,
2012
[16] Silva, T. R.; Lima, R. W.; Mesquita, H. H. O.; Marques, C. K. M. O
uso de Ferramentas Pedagógicas no desenvolvimento de Objetos de
Aprendizagem. In: XXXII Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de
Computação - CSBC. Curitiba – PR, 2012.
[17] Silva, T. R.; Lima, R. W.; Mesquita, H. H. O.; Costa, R. D.
Integrando um modelo de Objeto de Aprendizagem centrado no
processo de ensino-aprendizagem a um curso do Moodle. In:
MoodleMoot Brasil 2012. São Paulo – SP, 2012.
[18] Silva, T. R.; Lima, R. W.; Mesquita, H. H. O.; Marques, C. K. M.;
Costa, R. D; Rocha, S. M. P. T.; Medeiros, R. A. OBA-MC: um
modelo de Objeto de Aprendizagem centrado no processo de ensino-
aprendizagem utilizando o padrão SCORM. In: XXIII Simpósio
Brasileiro de Informática na Educação – SBIE. Rio de Janeiro– RJ,
2012.
[19] Silva, T. R.; Lima, R. W.; Mesquita, H. H. O.; Marques, C. K. M.;
Costa, R. D.; Rocha, S. M. P. T. Um modelo de Objetos de
Aprendizagem centrando no processo de ensino/aprendizagem. In: VII
Conferência Latino-Americana de Objetos e Tecnologia de
Aprendizagem - LACLO, 2012, Guayaquil, Equador.
[20] Tarouco, L. M. R.; Fabre, M. C. J. M.; Tamusiunas, F. R..
Reusabilidade de objetos educacionais. In: Revista Novas Tecnologias
na Educação - RENOTE. Porto Alegre, RS. v. 1, n. 1. 2003.
[21] Vieira, C. E.; Nicoleit, E. R.; Gonçalves, L. L. Objeto de
Aprendizagem baseado no Padrão SCORM para Suporte à
Aprendizagem de Funções. In: Workshop em Informática na
Educação (SBIE) Mackenzie. p. 402-411. 2007.
[22] Wiley, D. A. Connecting learning objects to instructional design
theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In The Instructional
Use of Learning Objects: Online Version. Utah: Association for
Educational Communications and Technology. 2000. Disponível em:
<http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc>. Acesso em: mar.
2012.
[23] W3C. World Wide Web Consortium. Disponível em:
<http://www.w3.org/>. Acesso em: set. 2012.