A Level Law Learner resource 6 - Statutory … · Web viewThe judge was right to use the wide...
9
Learner Resource 6 - Statutory interpretation case jigsaw LITERAL RULE The judge was right to use the literal rule in Fisher v Bell. The judge was wrong to use the literal rule in Fisher v Bell. The judge was right to use the literal rule in Whiteley v Chappell. The judge was wrong to use the literal rule in Whiteley v Chappell. The judge was right to use the literal rule in LNER v Berriman. The judge was wrong to use the literal rule in LNER v Berriman. The judge was right to use the literal rule in R v Bentham. The judge was wrong to use the literal rule in R v Bentham. Version 1 1 © OCR 2017 Law making
Transcript of A Level Law Learner resource 6 - Statutory … · Web viewThe judge was right to use the wide...
Learner Resource 6 - Statutory interpretation case jigsawLITERAL RULEThe judge was right to use the literal rule in Fisher v Bell.
The judge was wrong to use the literal rule in Fisher v Bell.
The judge was right to use the literal rule in Whiteley v Chappell.
The judge was wrong to use the literal rule in Whiteley v Chappell.
The judge was right to use the literal rule in LNER v Berriman.
The judge was wrong to use the literal rule in LNER v Berriman.
The judge was right to use the literal rule in R v Bentham.
The judge was wrong to use the literal rule in R v Bentham.
Version 1 1 © OCR 2017Law making
GOLDEN RULEThe judge was right to use the narrow golden rule in R v Allen.
The judge was wrong to use the narrow golden rule in R v Allen.
The judge was right to use the narrow golden rule in R v Maginnis.
The judge was wrong to use the narrow golden rule in R v Maginnis.
The judge was right to use the wide golden rule in Re Sigsworth.
The judge was wrong to use the wide golden rule in Re Sigsworth.
The judge was right to use the wide golden rule in Adler v George.
The judge was wrong to use the wide golden rule in Adler v George.
Version 1 2 © OCR 2017Law making
MISCHIEF RULEThe judge was right to use the mischief rule in Smith v Hughes.
The judge was wrong to use the mischief rule in Smith v Hughes.
The judge was right to use the mischief rule in Royal College of Nursing v DHSS.
The judge was wrong to use the mischief rule in Royal College of Nursing v DHSS.
The judge was right to use the mischief rule in Corkery v Carpenter.
The judge was wrong to use the mischief rule in Corkery v Carpenter.
The judge was right to use the mischief rule in DPP v Bull.
The judge was wrong to use the mischief rule in DPP v Bull.
Version 1 3 © OCR 2017Law making
PURPOSIVE APPROACHThe judge was right to use the purposive approach in Pepper v Hart.
The judge was wrong to use the purposive approach in Pepper v Hart.
The judge was right to use the purposive approach in R v Registrar-General ex parte Smith.
The judge was wrong to use the purposive approach in R v Registrar-General ex parte Smith.
The judge was right to use the purposive approach in Fitzpatrick v Stirling.
The judge was wrong to use the purposive approach in Fitzpatrick v Stirling.
The judge was right to use the purposive approach in Jones v Tower Boot.
The judge was wrong to use the purposive approach in Jones v Tower Boot.
Version 1 4 © OCR 2017Law making
Version 1 5 © OCR 2017Law making
OCR Resources: the small printOCR’s resources are provided to support the delivery of OCR qualifications, but in no way constitute an endorsed teaching method that is required by the Board, and the decision to
use them lies with the individual teacher. Whilst every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the content, OCR cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions within these
resources.
© OCR 2017 - This resource may be freely copied and distributed, as long as the OCR logo and this message remain intact and OCR is acknowledged as the originator of this work.
OCR acknowledges the use of the following content: n/a
Please get in touch if you want to discuss the accessibility of resources we offer to support delivery of our qualifications: [email protected]
