A Decapitated Human Skull from Medieval Kamakura Iwataro ...

1

Transcript of A Decapitated Human Skull from Medieval Kamakura Iwataro ...

J.AnthroP. Soc. NipPon 人類誌

100(3):349-358(1992)

MATERIALS

A Decapitated Human Skull from Medieval Kamakura

Iwataro M0RIM0TO and Kazuaki HIRATA

Department of Anatomy, St. Marianna University School of Medicine

Abstract The present study reports on the examination of a decapitated human male

skull with four upper cervical vertebrae and the hyoid bone, dating to the early

Muromachi period (late 14th century), from Kamakura. The decapitation may have

been the result of a sharp cut from the right rear. The cut runs horizontally into the

second cervical vertebra and stops in the bone, after having severed both the spinal

cord and the right vertebral artery. Superficial injuries to the skull were probably not the primary cause of death. The head was separated from the body post mortem,

probably as a result of an additional cut noted in the fourth cervical vertebra. It is suggested that the traditional Japanese method of decapitation in former times may

be characterized by a cut halfway through the neck, and this method of decapitation

can be traced back to the early Muromachi period.

Key Words Decapitation, Cut injury, Cervical vertebrae, Medieval Muromachi

period. Japanese tradition

Material

The decapitated skull reported here (no. 1043)

was excavated from location D-197 of the

Yuigahama Medieval Cemetery, Kamakura, in

1991, under the supervision of Mr. Hiroshi

HA. Two additional decapitated human,

male, skulls from another site in Kamakura have

been previously reported by MORIMOTO (1987).

This site dates to the early Muromachi, or

Namboku-cho period (late 14th century). The

skull with four upper cervical vertebrae and the

hyoid bone, were the only bones recovered from

this individual. The cervical vertebrae are not

present in most decapitation specimens dis-covered. The skull with the injured vertebrae,

presented in this report, are interesting and

valuable discoveries. They may be useful in con-

tributing to an explanation of the origin of the

traditional Japanese method of decapitation.

Observations

The excavated bones were in good condition

with a well preserved internal architecture. There

was no closure of the coronal, lambdoid or

sagittal sutures on both external and internal

surfaces of the cranial vault, although upper and

lower third molars, with slight wear, could be

seen on both sides. Therefore the male of this

skull would have been in his early twenties at the

time of death. The paleopathological observa-

tions concerning the method of decapitation

obtained are given in the following description.

A dozen injuries, probably resulting from a

Article No. 9212 Received May 14, 1992

350 I. MORIMOTO and K. HIRATA

Fig. 1. The upper part of the facial skull, viewed from the right front. Note the injuries to both frontal

squama (a) and right orbital region (b), which took the form of superficial incisions.

Japanese sword with a keen edge, were found in

both the skull and the cervical vertebrae. The

skull had six injuries. An injury to the frontal

squama on the right side was 45mm in length,

running in an oblique direction from the right

rear to the left front (a in Fig. 1). The injury took

the form of superficial incisions, having an in-

clined cut surface from the external table to the diploe of the squama, accompanied with a

secondary loss of bone opposed to the cut sur-

face. Another injury to the anterior border of the

lateral wall of the right orbit grazed the bone. The

area involved is from the right zygomatic pro-

cess of the frontal bone to the frontal process of

the right zygomatic, although the cut surface was

divided into two small facets by a faint transverse

ridge (b in Fig. 1). One more injury to the right

parietal bone ran in an almost sagittal direction below, and parallel to, the right temporal line (c

in Fig. 2). The entire length of this injury could

not be determined, because most of the cut

surface and its neighboring area had been broken

and lost. It was, however, conceivable that the

cutting by the sword took the form of a kind of

A Decapitated Human Skull from Medieval Kamakura 351

Fig. 2. The cranial vault, viewed from right-inferior-rear. Note the injuries to both the right

parietal (c) and the occipital (d) bones. The former took the form of a kind of gash, tangentially reaching the cranial cavity to a slight degree, whereas the latter cut off the right inferior nuchal

line, causing a break of the neighboring nuchal plane.

gash, tangentially reaching the cranial cavity to a slight degree.

All the above three injuries to the skull showed

the clear-cut unhealed nature of the wound, so

that they would have been made just before

death. Because the injuries failed to reach the

interior of the skull, they could not be regarded

as the primary cause of death. Moreover, there

were three other injuries to the skull; one to the

occipital bone, and two to the mandible. The

injury to the occipital bone cut off the right

inferior nuchal line in a slightly inclined plane

from right cranially to left caudally, causing a

break of the neighboring nuchal plane, although the sword did not enter into the cranial cavity (d

in Fig. 2). It was uncertain whether the occipital

bone received the injury during life or after death.

The two injuries to the mandible were a pair of

upper and lower transverse cuts from the right

rear on the posterior border of the right mandi

bular ramus. The upper transverse cut ran

somewhat obliquely from the lower rear upward

toward the front (e in Fig. 3), whereas the lower

injury passed in a nearly horizontal direction (f

in Fig. 3). These injuries corresponded to the two

cut surfaces in the second cervical vertebra or axis

(j and h in Fig. 5) mentioned below. The upper four cervical vertebrae had six

injuries due to five cuts with the sword. The first

cervical vertebra, or atlas, was cut horizontally

from behind. This chipped off the lower border

of the posterior part of the vertebral arch of this

bone (g in Fig. 4). The cut surface in the atlas

corresponded to the most superior cut in the axis

as mentioned next. The axis was cut horizontally

from the right rear three times by the sword, so

352 I. MORIMOTO and K. HIRATA

Fig. 3. The right mandibular ramus, viewed from the right. The injuries (e) and (f) in this bone respectively

corresponded to those to the axis (i) and (h), which are shown in Fig. 5.

that the bone had three cut surfaces. These cut surfaces were laid at three different levels in this

bone. The most superior cut surface was located

on the posterior portion of the base of the

odontoid process or dens (h in Fig. 5), and the

second superior cut surface was running through

both the upper portion of the vertebral arch and

the posterior half of the right superior articular

process about half a centimeter below the level of the most superior cut (i in Fig. 5).

Both the most superior and second superior

cut surfaces stopped anteriorly at the central parts

of the dens and vertebral body, so that there was

a loss of the dens and vertebral body between the

two cut surfaces. Because the plane of the most

superior cut surface in the axis corresponded to

that of the above-mentioned lower cut on the

posterior border of the right mandibular ramus

(f in Fig. 3), it seemed that the cutting sword was stopped not only by the dens, but also by the right mandibular ramus. The most inferior cut

surface in the axis was running through the spinous process and stopped in the vertebral arch

of this bone, resulting in chipping off the bone

A Decapitated Human Skull from Medieval Kamakura 353

Fig. 4. The atlas, viewed from below. Note that the injury to this bone (g) corresponded to that to the axis (h) as shown in Fig. 5,

Fig. 5. The axis, viewed from above. Note the three injuries (h), (i) and Q) to this bone at the different levels. For explanation see text.

354 l.. MORIM0T0 and K. HIRATA

Fig. 6. The third cervical vertebra, viewed from the rear. Note the oblique injury (k) to the vertebral body through the right inferior articular processes and vertebral arch.

Fig. 7. The fourth cervical vertebra, viewed from below. Note the injury to this bone (1), which was stopped at the vertebral body after passing through the spinous and right inferior

articular processes.

A Decapitated Human Skull from Medieval Kamakura 355

above the cut surface (j in Fig. 5).

The most inferior cut surface was in a slightly

inclined direction from the right rear to the left

above. Because it corresponded to the upper cut

on the posterior border of the right mandibular

ramus (e in Fig. 3), it was probable that the

cutting was also stopped by both the axis and the

mandible.

The third cervical vertebra was cut from the

right rear (k in Fig. 6). The cut surface passed obliquely from the right below to the left above,

parallel to the lowest cut surface in the axis. It ran into both the vertebral arch and the body

through the spinous and right inferior articular

processes of this bone, and came to a stop at the left pedicle of the vertebral arch. As a result, the

spinous and right inferior articular processes and their neighboring area of this bone were cut off

and lost. Finally, the fourth cervical vertebra was cut

horizontally from the right rear, the cut surface

passing from the spinous and right inferior articular processes to stop on a straight line

connecting the left inferior articular process with

the left quarter of the vertebral body (1 in Fig.

7). The spinous and left inferior articular pro-

cesses of this bone were thus cut off and lost. No

injury was, however, found in the hyoid bone.

Discussion and Conclusion

+Considering the sword injuries to both the

skull and the cervical vertebrae, the human male

Fig. 8. The upper four cervical vertebrae articulated, viewed from behind. Note the injuries to the atlas (g), to the axis (h), (i) and (j), and to the third (k) and fourth (1) cervical vertebrae ,

due to five cuts at various levels.

356 I. MORIMOTO and K. HIRATA

examined in this report died as a direct result of

decapitation. The injuries to the frontal squama,

the lateral wall of the right orbit, and the right

parietal and occipital bones of the skull, as mentioned above, were probably not the primary

cause of death. Since there were found five cut

surfaces in the articulated cervical vertebrae of

this male, it is difficult to determine the decisive

injury from which he died when decapitated.

Of the five cuts, the lowest in the axis (j in

Fig. 8) and the cut in the third cervical vertebra

(k in Fig. 8) are to be excluded for two reasons. The first reason is that the cuts followed an

oblique line running from the right rear to the

left superior direction so that these cuts could not

have resulted in a decapitation. The second

reason is that the cut in the axis was too super-

ficial to sever the spinal cord. The remaining three

cuts in the neck can be divided into two, two

upper and one lower. The upper two cuts (g + h

and i in Fig. 8) were concentrated on the atlas

and the axis, while the lower cut (tin Figs. 8 and

9) passed into the fourth cervical vertebra. As

previously mentioned by KAWAGOE (1965) and MORIMOTO (1981), the sword at the time of

decapitation approached from behind and some-

times missed the mark and cut into the occipital

bone. This indicates that the junction of the skull

and the vertebral column was the target of the

sword for decapitation. It is, thus, natural to

suppose that one of the two cuts in the axis of

this male had a possibility of providing the fatal

injury during decapitation.

Either of these two cuts could have taken his life, because it ran horizontally to reach a depth

sufficient to sever both the spinal cord and the

right vertebral artery. The second superior cut

in the axis, as well as the cuts in the third and

fourth cervical vertebrae, were on the other hand

possibly made by the sword when the head was

Fig. 9. The skull and upper four cervical vertebrae articulated,

viewed from front. Note that the cut to the fourth cervical vertebra

(I) was stopped after cutting into the bone.

A Decapitated Human Skull from Medieval Kamakura 357

separated from the body after death. This is

based on three reasons as follows; l) the injuries

to the atlas and dens were too high to separate

the head from the body after death, and the

mandible obstructed the cutting; 2) the injury to

the third cervical vertebra ran in a direction

difficult for decapitation, running obliquely from

the right rear to the left above, almost parallel

to the lowest cut in the axis as mentioned above;

and 3) only the skull with the upper four cervical

vertebrae and the hyoid bone remained, sug-

gesting that the effective and final separation of the head was done by a cut into the fourth

cervical vertebra. The decapitated male may have been a

seriously wounded warrior, or samurai, who had

given up all hope of living, and was then assisted in committing suicide, either by his wish, or an

order as a result of an unavoidable circumstance.

In Japan at that time, the execution of a samurai was considered a disgrace, thus suicide by sword

was viewed as an honorable way of dying. After

the identification of the head, which had been separated and taken away from the body, it

was buried at the Yuigahama Cemetery in

Kamakura. At any rate, the observations ob-

tained clearly show that the sword for decapita-

tion in the medieval Kamakura passed deep into

the cervical vertebral column from the right rear,

and yet came to a full stop within the bone after

severing the spinal cord and the right vertebral

artery, putting him to death.

A Japanese tradition in the feudal Edo period

was that the anterior skin of the neck should be

left intact at the time of decapitation. The present

material, added to the decapitated skulls des-

cribed previously by MORIMOTO (1987), reveals

that the halfway-cut method of decapitation for

man was adopted not only in the more recent Edo

era, but also in the early medieval Muromachi

or Nambokucho period of Japan. BROTHWELL

(1981) mentioned that decapitation usually

resulted in cleanly divided cervical vertebrae, as

seen in Iron Age specimens from Sutton Walls.

This apparently was not the traditional method

of decapitation in Japan of ancient times. It

should be, therefore, noted that the traditional

Japanese method of decapitation was distinguish-

able from the ancient European manner, by a

halfway-cut from the right rear.

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to express their thanks to

Mr. Norikata MATSUO of the Board of Educa-

tion of Kamakura City and Mr. Hiroshi HARA

of the director of the excavations of Yuigahama

Medieval Cemetery for material and helpful

suggestions.

抄 録

中世鎌倉 出土 の打 ち首,追 加1例

森本岩太郎 ・平 田和明

かつてMORIMOTO(1987)が 報 告 した南 北 朝期 に

おけ る打 ち首2例 の追 加 と して,1991年 に鎌 倉市 比

由 ケ浜中世集 団墓地 か ら出土 した同時 代 の壮 年期 男

性 頭蓋1例 を提示 す る.こ の頭蓋 は第1~4頸 椎 ・舌

骨 とともに墓地に埋め られ て いた.他 の骨格 部分 は

ない.頭 蓋に は6個 の刀 創 が見 られ る.う ち3個 は

死の直前 に受 けた もので,前 頭鱗 右側 を左前 方 か ら

右後方に斜め に走 って板間層 に達 す る長 さ45mmの 刀

創(a),右 眼窩外側縁 の骨 をそ ぎ落 とした刀創(b),

右頭頂骨を前後方向 に走 って 頭蓋 冠 表面 と接 線 方向

に浅 く頭蓋腔 に達 した刀創(c)で あ るが,こ れ らは

浅 く,直 接死因で はなさそ うであ る.残 りの3個 は,

後頭骨右下項線を そぎ落 とした刀創(d),右 下 顎枝

後縁 にほぼ水平 に切 り込 んだ2個 の刀 創(e,f)で

ある.後 頭骨 の刀創(d)は 打 ち首の時か死後 の もの

か は分か らないが,右 下顎枝 の刀創(e,f)は,後 述

す る軸椎 の刀創(i,h)と それぞれ一致す る.

い っぽ う頸椎 には右後 方か ら鋭 く切 り込 ん だ ほぼ

水平 に走 る5回 分6個 の刀創 が認 め られ る.上 方 か

ら順 に,環 椎 の椎 弓下縁 をかす めて(9),軸 椎歯 突

起 の後部 に達 して止ま る刀創(h),軸 椎 の椎 弓上 部

358 I. MORIMOTO and K. HIRATA

と右上関節突起後 部を切 り軸 椎体 に達 して止 ま る刀

創(i),軸 椎 の棘突 起 を右後 下 方 か ら切 って椎 弓内

で止 まる刀創(j),第3頸 椎 の棘突 起 ・右 下関 節突

起 ・椎 弓 ・椎体 を右後下 方か ら切 って左 椎 弓根 で止

ま る刀 創(k).第4頸 椎 の棘 突起 ・右下 関節 突 起

・椎体下部 を切 り離 して椎体 の左1/4部で止 まる刀創

(D,で ある.

上述 のよ うに環椎 の刀創(g)お よび軸 椎 の刀創

(h)は 右下 顎枝後縁の刀創(f)と,ま た軸 椎 の刀創

(j)は 右下 顎枝後縁の刀創(e)と,そ れ ぞれ一 致す

る.舌 骨 に刀創 は見 られなか った.

打 ち首 された時の創傷 は環椎 ・軸椎 ・右 下顎 枝 に

残 る刀創(g+h+f)か,ま た は軸 椎 の刀創(i)の

いずれか と推測 され,こ れ は頸 髄 ・右 椎骨 動脈 を完

全 に横 切 し,致 命的で あ る.ま た軸椎 ・右 下顎 枝 の

刀創(j+e)お よび第3・4頸 椎 の刀創(k)・(1)は

死後 頭部を切 り離 した際 に加 え られ た もの と思 わ れ

る.本 例 はたぶ ん手負 いの武 士 が名 を重 ん じ首 を打

たれた もので あろ う.

江戸時代 には 「打 ち首 は頸 の前皮 一枚 残 して切 る

のが常 法』 と言 われたが,古 い 日本 の半 切 りによ る

打ち首の伝統 の起 源が南北朝期 まで さかの ぼ り得 る

ことを示 す好例 として,先 の2例 とと もに本 例 は注

目され る.

References

BROTHWELL, D.R., 1981: Digging up Bones, 3rd ed. British Museum (Natural History)/Cornell Univ.

Press, New York, pp. 120-121. KAWAGOE, T., 1965: Edo Period Excavated. Maruzen,

Tokyo, pp. 82-85. (In Japanese)

〔河越 逸 行,1965:堀 り出 され た江 戸 時 代.丸 善,東

京,pp.82-85.〕

MORIMOTO, I., 1981: Examples of human skeletal

remains from Kanto District, Japan. Monthly

Archaeological Journal, 197: 13-18. (In Japanese)

〔森 本 岩 太 郎,1981:古 人 骨 研 究 の 事 例,(1>関 東.

月 刊 考 古 学 ジ ャ ー ナ ル,197:13-18.〕

MORIM0T0, I., 1987: Note on the technique of de-

capitation in medieval Japan. J. Anthrop. Soc.

Nippon, 95: 477-486.

森 本 岩太郎 聖マリァンナ医科大学第2解 剖学教室

〒216 川崎市宮前区菅生2-16-1

Iwataro MORIMOTO Department of Anatomy

St. Marianna University School of Medicine

2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki 216

Japan