A basic analysis of sources, dates, authors for a Marine Biological Laboratory SAIL meeting -...
-
Upload
jaylene-gambrill -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of A basic analysis of sources, dates, authors for a Marine Biological Laboratory SAIL meeting -...
Citation Analysis of Theses/Dissertations
A basic analysis of sources, dates, authors for a Marine Biological Laboratory
SAIL meeting - Wilmington, N.C. - May 14, 2009Kathleen Heil, UMCES, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, MD
In these tough financial times when science is becoming more interdisciplinary and subfields are expanding as are number of titles in the sciences I wanted a way to evaluate material usage.
Since most of our journals are now accessible on-line I had lost my major source of input on usage, which was re-shelving and observation.
Introduction:
Citation analysis has merits and limitations, but has many applications beyond collection development.
Although I haven’t gotten further than the collection development access at this point.
My future goal is to show institutional relatedness. (How broad or limited are our institutional connections)
CBL has always had very strong ties to the University of Maryland
1925 Founded under Dr. Truitt from Univ. of Md. 1930’s Start of summer programs 1941 Sponsored by the Md. Conservation Dept and became
the chief component of the State Dept. of Research and Education
1961 Md. Legislature created the Natural Resources Institute as part of the University of Maryland◦ Summer Classes began as Credit courses toward degrees
1973 Became part of a new Campus of the University of Maryland System - The Center for Environmental & Estuarine
Studies (UMCEES) 1997 Became UMCES (University of Maryland Center for
Environmental Science.
Background:
Background/History (continued) 1976 Graduate students formally began work during the school year as part of their graduate school experience
The first degrees were issued in : ◦1976 MS under the Dept of Botany
University of Maryland College Park◦1981 PhD Under the Dept of Microbiology
University of Maryland College Park
Compare and contrast literature citations from MS & PhD theses/dissertations◦Identify citation patterns◦Formats of materials used◦Most frequently cited material◦Differences between subject areas
Objective:
Use DRUM, the University of Maryland Dspace Open Access archive to pull UMCES-CBL theses/dissertations from the last 5 years.
http://www.lib.umd.edu/drum Copy and paste references into Word and
then move them into Excel. Put each thesis/dissertation into a new tab Sort data into uniform format: author, year,
title, source.
Methodology:
Sort by yearGraphHope to get to soon -
◦Use find replace function to switch years to age
Find usage by year
Sh '05 Dy '05 Ku '06 Ke '07 Ja '08 Totals
1950's 0 0 0 0 2 2
1960's 0 0 3 0 1 4
1970's 3 4 4 1 6 18
1980's 21 23 20 6 8 78
1990's 56 45 43 43 25 212
2000's 1 95 38 75 24 233
81 169 108 125 67 547
PhD year spans
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Ki 04 Fr 04 Ch 04 Ro 04 Sc 05 Me 05 Cr 06 Ko 06 Eg 06 KL 07 Tr 07 Fi 07 Men 07 Ma 08
students
quan
tity1700
1800
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970-4
1975-9
1980-4
1985-9
1990-4
1995-9
2000-4
2005-
A / V Audio tape / Video B Monograph C Conference Paper D/TH Dissertation / Thesis Go Government document/web site Gr Grey Literature J Journal M Magazine N Newspaper P Personal Communication S Software T Technical report W Web site/ web page
Identify Materials Cited
Most Heavily Cited Journals I reviewed a merged listing of publications
After doing sort on material type
There were 40 journal titles that had over 10 citations
Range from 10 to 119
The highest used title was Environmental Science and technology
Top 5 cited journalsTop 5 cited publications
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Marine Chemistry Estuaries J . Geophys. Res Atmospheric Environ. Env. Sci & Tech.
Journals with over 5 Cites
Ann Rev Microb 5
Appl Envir. Micro 85
Aquat Microb Ecol 18
Aquat Tox 5
Arch Env.Cont.&Tox 4
Ecotox & Envir. Safety 5
Environ. Microbiol 10
E S & T 24
Environ. Tox & Chem 20
FEMS Microbiology Ecol 8
Geochi et Cosmo Acta 7
J. Bact. 8
L & O 18
Marine Biology 5
MEPS 9
Microbial Ecol 8
Nature 10
Organic Geochem 8
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 9
Science 13
Water Air & Soil Poll 5
284
References: Ashman, Allen B. “An examination of the research objectives of recent citation analysis studies” Collection
Management 34 : 112-128, 2009. Bakkalbasi, Nisa, Kathleen Bauer, Janis Glover and Lei Wang “Three options for citation tracking: Google
Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science” eprints.rclis.org/archive/00006080 Burrell, Quentin L. “Are “Sleeping Beauties” to be expected? (Short communication) Scientometrics v. 65
(3): 381-389, 2005. Cordes, Ruth, “Is grey literature ever used? Using citation analysis to measure the impact of GESAMP, an
international marine scientific advisory body” Can. J. Infor & Lib. Sci v.28 (1): 49-69, 2004 Cox, Janice E. “Citation analysis of graduate dental theses references: implications for collection
development”. Collection management 33 (3): 219-234, 2008. Kuruppu, Pali U. & Debra C. Moore “Information use by PhD students I agriculture and biology: a dissertation
citation analysis” Portal: Libraries and the academy v. 8 (4): 2008, pp. 387-405. Moed, Henk F. “new developments in citation analysis and research evaluation” Information Services & Use
(2006) 135-137 Ortega, Linda “Age of reference in chemistry articles: Science & Technology Libraries, 28 (3):209-46, 2008. Radicchi, Filippo, Santo Fortunate & Claudio Castellano “Universality of citation distributions: Toward an
objetive measure of scientific impact” PNAS Nov. 11, 2008. Vol. 105 (45) 17268-17278. Ralston, Rick, Carole Gall, Frances A. Brahmi “Do local citation patterns support use of the impact factor for
collection development” J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 96 (4): Oct. 2008 pp. 374-378. Su, Yu-Min, Shu-Ching Yang, Ping-Yu Hsu, Wen-Lung Shiau “Extending co-citation analysis to discover
authors with multiple expertise” Expert Systems with Applications 36: 4287-4295, 2009 Tunon, Johanna, Bruce Brydges. “Expanded assessment study examining the citation patterns from
traditional and nontraditional institutions and their effect upon the quality of doctoral dissertation reference lists.
Vallmitjana, Nuria and L.G. Sabate. “Citation analysis of PhD Dissertation references as a tool for collection management in an academic chemistry library. College & Research libraries v. 69 (1) : 72-81, Jan 2008.