A 10-a editie a Seminarului National de nanostiinta si nanotehnologie 18 mai 2011 Biblioteca...

1
A 10-a editie a Seminarului National de nanostiinta si nanotehnologie 18 mai 2011 Biblioteca Academiei Romane ELASTIC NANOVESICLES AS STEROID HORMONES TRANSDERMAL DELIVERY SYSTEM. PREPARATION, CHARACTERIZATION AND IN VITRO EVALUATORY STUDIES INTRODUCTION Drospirenone is a new antimineralocorticoid progestin, also with an antiandrogenic activity, used for contraception and management of menopausal symptoms (1). At present, on the market there are only oral formulations with drospirenone (DRS). This oral administration has certain disadvantages, which can be eliminated by transdermal formulation. One of the problems encountered in transdermal drug delivery is the low permeability of drugs through the skin barrier. This problem can be solved by using elastic vesicles as drug delivery systems (2). METHODS AND RESULTS Preparation of elastic vesicles Fig 1. The mechanism of transferosomes preparation by hydration of the lipidic film method (3) Fig 2. The mechanism of ethosomes preparation by Touitou method (4) Entrapment Efficiency Determination 0.2 ml from liposomal suspensions were separated by centrifugation at 12000 rpm at 10ºC for 60 min. Drospirenone was analyzed spectrophotometrically. Table 1.The influence of transferosomes and ethosomes composition on the entrapment efficiency Stability studies for ethosomes and transferosomes The studies were performed during a period of 2 month; the entrapment efficiency and size distribution were determined. The results indicated a good stability for transferosomes and ethosomes; the entrapment efficiency decreased insignificantly (table 1) and vesicles’ size distribution was approximately constant for two months. CONCLUSIONS In Vitro release study In vitro drug release studies were conducted with a modified Frantz diffusion cell where a standard cellophane membrane was fitted. The receptor medium consisted of phosphate buffer in hydroalcoholic solution. The DRS released through the cellophane membrane was spectrophotometrically analyzed at 274 nm. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 After sonication, the dimensions of transferosomes population were between 50 – 90 nm, and for ethosomes between 20-70 nm; these values were approximately constant for 2 months. The conducted experiments showed that the molar ratios of DRS, phosphatidyl choline (PC) and sodium cholate influence the drug entrapment of the transferosomes. In case of ethosomes, the entrapment efficiency was affected by the percentage of ethanol, PC and DRS in the formulation. The release rate was also influenced by the composition of ethosomes and transferosomes: lower percentage of sodium cholate determined higher release rate in case of transferosomes, respectively higher percentage of ethanol resulted in higher release rate. Ethosomes and transferosomes formulations released 40-86 % DRS in 24h, compared with a hydroalcoholic solution of DRS, which released 96% in 2h. Size Distribution Size distribution was determined with Mastersizer 2000 – Malvern instrument The size determinations showed a large polydispersion of the elastic vesicles, with a higher percentage between 70 and 150 nm in case of the analyzed MLV ethosomes, and between 180-500 nm in case of the MLV transpherosomes. Type of vesicl es Ratio m/m/m PC : Co : DRS (g) Ratio V/V ethanol : water (%) Percentage of entrapment after preparation (%) Percentage of entrapment after 1 month (%) Percentage of entrapment after 2 months (%) TDRS I 100 : 20 : 20 - 78.57 77.92 76.33 TDRS II 100 : 15 : 20 - 98 97.3 96.89 EDRS II - 44 : 56 74.5 74.12 73.20 EDRS II - 30 : 70 78.13 77.32 76.85 EDRS III - 20 : 80 80.4 79.2 78.44 1. Sitruk-Ware R. (2006) Human Reproduction Update 12, 169-178 2. Honeywell-Nguyen P. L., Bouwstra J. (2005) Drug discovery Today: Technologies, 267-74. 3. Elsayed M. M. A., Abdallah O. Y., Naggar V., F., Khalafalah N., M. (2006) International Jurnal of Pharmaceutics, 322, 60-66. 4. Touitou E., Godin B.and Weiss C. (2002), Drug Develop .Res. 50, 406-415. REFERENCES DRS solution Fig 3. Released procentage of DRS in 24 h EDRS II EDRS III EDRS I TDRS I TDRS II 1 National Institute for Chemical Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Bucharest 2 University of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Carol Davila”, Bucharest 3 S.C. Pharma Serv International S.R.L, Bucharest 4 University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Bucharest Cristina Hlevca 1 , Cristina Dinu Parvu 2 , Luigi Silvestro 3 , Alina Ortan 4 , Elena Patrut 1 , Rasit Iuksel 1 , Minerva Panteli 1

Transcript of A 10-a editie a Seminarului National de nanostiinta si nanotehnologie 18 mai 2011 Biblioteca...

Page 1: A 10-a editie a Seminarului National de nanostiinta si nanotehnologie 18 mai 2011 Biblioteca Academiei Romane ELASTIC NANOVESICLES AS STEROID HORMONES.

A 10-a editie a Seminarului National de nanostiinta si nanotehnologie

18 mai 2011 Biblioteca Academiei Romane

ELASTIC NANOVESICLES AS STEROID HORMONES TRANSDERMAL DELIVERY SYSTEM. PREPARATION, CHARACTERIZATION AND IN VITRO

EVALUATORY STUDIES

INTRODUCTIONDrospirenone is a new antimineralocorticoid progestin, also with an antiandrogenic activity, used for contraception and management of menopausal symptoms (1). At present, on the market there are only oral formulations with drospirenone (DRS). This oral administration has certain disadvantages, which can be eliminated by transdermal formulation.One of the problems encountered in transdermal drug delivery is the low permeability of drugs through the skin barrier. This problem can be solved by using elastic vesicles as drug delivery systems (2).

METHODS AND RESULTSPreparation of elastic vesicles

Fig 1. The mechanism of transferosomes preparation by hydration of the lipidic

film method (3)

Fig 2. The mechanism of ethosomes preparation by

Touitou method (4)

Entrapment Efficiency Determination 0.2 ml from liposomal suspensions were separated by centrifugation at 12000 rpm at 10ºC for 60 min. Drospirenone was analyzed spectrophotometrically.

Table 1.The influence of transferosomes and ethosomes composition on the entrapment efficiency

Stability studies for ethosomes and transferosomesThe studies were performed during a period of 2 month; the entrapment efficiency and size distribution were determined.The results indicated a good stability for transferosomes and ethosomes; the entrapment efficiency decreased insignificantly (table 1) and vesicles’ size distribution was approximately constant for two months.

CONCLUSIONS

In Vitro release studyIn vitro drug release studies were conducted with a modified Frantz diffusion cell where a standard cellophane membrane was fitted. The receptor medium consisted of phosphate buffer in hydroalcoholic solution. The DRS released through the cellophane membrane was spectrophotometrically analyzed at 274 nm.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

After sonication, the dimensions of transferosomes population were between 50 – 90 nm, and for ethosomes between 20-70 nm; these values were approximately constant for 2 months. The conducted experiments showed that the molar ratios of DRS, phosphatidyl choline (PC) and sodium cholate influence the drug entrapment of the transferosomes. In case of ethosomes, the entrapment efficiency was affected by the percentage of ethanol, PC and DRS in the formulation. The release rate was also influenced by the composition of ethosomes and transferosomes: lower percentage of sodium cholate determined higher release rate in case of transferosomes, respectively higher percentage of ethanol resulted in higher release rate. Ethosomes and transferosomes formulations released 40-86 % DRS in 24h, compared with a hydroalcoholic solution of DRS, which released 96% in 2h.

Size DistributionSize distribution was determined with Mastersizer 2000 – Malvern instrument The size determinations showed a large polydispersion of the elastic vesicles, with a higher percentage between 70 and 150 nm in case of the analyzed MLV ethosomes, and between 180-500 nm in case of the MLV transpherosomes.

Type of vesicles

Ratio m/m/mPC : Co : DRS

(g)

Ratio V/Vethanol : water

(%)

Percentage of entrapment after

preparation(%)

Percentage of entrapment

after 1 month (%)

Percentage of entrapment

after 2 months (%)

TDRS I 100 : 20 : 20 - 78.57 77.92 76.33

TDRS II 100 : 15 : 20 - 98 97.3 96.89

EDRS II - 44 : 56 74.5 74.12 73.20

EDRS II - 30 : 70 78.13 77.32 76.85

EDRS III - 20 : 80 80.4 79.2 78.44

1. Sitruk-Ware R. (2006) Human Reproduction Update 12, 169-1782. Honeywell-Nguyen P. L., Bouwstra J. (2005) Drug discoveryToday: Technologies, 267-74.3. Elsayed M. M. A., Abdallah O. Y., Naggar V., F., Khalafalah N., M. (2006) International Jurnal of Pharmaceutics, 322, 60-66.4. Touitou E., Godin B.and Weiss C. (2002), Drug Develop .Res. 50, 406-415.

REFERENCES

DRS solution

Fig 3. Released procentage of DRS in 24 h

EDRS II

EDRS III

EDRS I TDRS I

TDRS II

1National Institute for Chemical Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Bucharest 2University of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Carol Davila”, Bucharest 3S.C. Pharma Serv International S.R.L, Bucharest 4 University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Bucharest

Cristina Hlevca1, Cristina Dinu Parvu2 , Luigi Silvestro3, Alina Ortan4 , Elena Patrut1, Rasit Iuksel1, Minerva Panteli1