99 Humbie, East & West Saltoun and Bolton Community Council

download 99 Humbie, East & West Saltoun and Bolton Community Council

of 2

Transcript of 99 Humbie, East & West Saltoun and Bolton Community Council

  • 8/10/2019 99 Humbie, East & West Saltoun and Bolton Community Council

    1/2

    Humbie, East & West Saltoun and Bolton Community Council

    Iain Gray - Bus Regulation (Scotland) Bill

    Our Community Council covers a rural area within East Lothian. The

    entire area sits within a 20 mile radius of Edinburgh. Humbie has no bus

    service, yet it is less than 3 miles from the main A68. East & West

    Saltoun and Bolton have very few buses during the day, no buses in the

    evening and none on Sundays. This service is provided by a local firm

    Prentice Coaches. East and West Saltoun are 6 miles and Bolton less

    than 3 miles from Haddington from where there are regular bus services

    to Edinburgh.

    Over the last few years our community has seen a significant

    deterioration in bus service provision, both in terms of timetabling and

    frequency. The consequences of this have meant that all members of

    our community are reliant on the private car for accessing work, shops,visiting relatives etc. Non drivers have suffered most from this and rely

    increasingly on neighboursand parents goodwill for their

    transportation needs. In some cases non drivers have had to change

    jobs and/or consider moving house.

    The deterioration in bus services has been such a concern in our

    community that we undertook a survey. This concluded that the bus

    service is neither suited for working adults or for accessing local services

    such as shops, doctors etc.. This survey is available from the Humbie,

    East & West Saltoun and Bolton Community Council upon request.

    Please consider and respond to the following.

    1.Do you support the general aim of the proposed Bill? Please indicate

    yes/no/undecided and explain the reasons for your response.

    We support the main aim of the bill as it would hopefully give local transport

    authorities more of a say in their local bus services and would make the running of

    bus services more democratic.

    It would hopefully make services more stable and avoid situations like the fiasco withFirst Bus in East Lothian where so many services were stopped at very short notice.

    2.What would be the main practical advantages of the legislation proposed? What

    would be the disadvantages

    The advantages would be the removal of rules which frustrate integrated transport.

    There should be better timetabling and hopefully less reliance on the car.

    One of the disadvantages would be that it could exclude small local operators like

    Prentice in East Lothian who provide local employment and have local knowledge.

    They would be unlikely to be able to bid for franchises. Ultimately this would lead to

    a reduction in service providers, therefore allowing large companies to monopoliseservices and dictate their terms.

  • 8/10/2019 99 Humbie, East & West Saltoun and Bolton Community Council

    2/2

    3. In what ways do you envisage reregulation being used to improve bus services?

    Hopefully, there could be more integrated ticketing and timetables which would

    make journeys more convenient. There should be ways of specifying minimum levels

    of service.

    4. How can community transport be better utilised to serve local communities and

    particularly low passenger volume routes?

    The worry is that if Community Transport is better utilised it could mean that this will

    become the norm in rural areas, particularly in those areas that at present have a

    bus service that is maybe not highly profitable. There has to be a distinction between

    the rural areas that are very remote and therefore Community Transport may be the

    only viable solution and rural areas that are within a few miles of main towns. In these

    areas, near to towns, a bus service with sensible timetabling into the nearest town

    should be possible.

    5. Do you agree that the Traffic Commissioner should be able to impose greater

    financial penalties on operators who a) fail to meet the terms of the franchise or b)

    walk away from the franchise altogether?

    Yes, providing that any financial penalties are used to benefit the bus services as a

    whole.

    6. What is your assessment of the likely financial implications of the proposed Bill to

    you or your organisation? What other significant financial implications are likely to

    arise?

    There could be a negative effect if small local bus companies are unable to tender

    for franchises.

    7. Is the proposed Bill likely to have any substantial positive or negative implications

    for equality? If it is likely to have a substantial negative implication, how might this be

    minimised or avoided?

    In our area it is the non car driving adults who rely on the bus and older school

    children who want to use the bus to gain some independence from their taxi driving

    parents. If services can be tailored to the needs of these groups they could use the

    buses more and therefore bus companies would become more viableprofit.

    8. Do you have any other comment or suggestion that is relevant to the need for or

    detail of this Bill?

    There should be liaison with rail services in order for there to be better connections

    between the two. They should be working together to produce seamless journeys.

    Proposals must seek to protect, and encourage, the small bus operators who provide

    local employment and local knowledge. Large franchises risk creating monopolies of

    large bus companies who can then dictate their terms.