Average Temperatures, Precipitations and Rainfall for Select Cities in CMR
9 precipitations - rainfall
-
Upload
abouthydrology-slides -
Category
Education
-
view
1.019 -
download
0
Transcript of 9 precipitations - rainfall
Riccardo Rigon
Some Atmospheric Physics
Gio
rgio
ne
- La
tem
pes
ta,
15
07
-15
08
Saturday, September 11, 2010
“The rain patters, the leaf quivers” Rabindranath Tagore
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Objectives:
3
•To Give an introduction to general circulation phenomena and a description of the atmospheric phenomena that are correlated to precipitation
•To introduce a minimum of atmospheric thermodynamics and some clues regarding cloud formation
•To speak of precipitations, their formation in the atmosphere, and their characterisations on the ground
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Radiation
• The motor behind it all is solar radiation
Wik
iped
ia
- Su
n
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
!"#$#"%"#& '%($()"*#$(+%,-./'/#(./#./$(#
('$",-%'(#0'%+#(./#/12$(%'#(%#(./#-%3/,#
4%235#6/#7$'')/5#%2(#68#$#5)'/7(#(./'+$3#7/33
Fou
fula
-Geo
rgio
u, 2
00
8
5
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
D = 2 ω V sin φ
6
But the Earth rotates on its own axis
And this means that all bodies are subject to the Coriolis force
In the northern hemisphere, a body moving at non-null velocity is deviated to the right. In the southern hemisphere, to the left.
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
D = 2 ω V sin φ
7
But the Earth rotates on its own axis
And this means that all bodies are subject to the Coriolis force
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
D = 2 ω V sin φ
7
Coriolis Force
But the Earth rotates on its own axis
And this means that all bodies are subject to the Coriolis force
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
D = 2 ω V sin φ
7
Coriolis Force
Rotational velocity of the Earth
But the Earth rotates on its own axis
And this means that all bodies are subject to the Coriolis force
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
D = 2 ω V sin φ
7
Coriolis Force
Rotational velocity of the Earth
Relative velocity of the object considered
But the Earth rotates on its own axis
And this means that all bodies are subject to the Coriolis force
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
D = 2 ω V sin φ
7
Coriolis Force
Rotational velocity of the Earth
Relative velocity of the object considered
Latitude of the object considered
But the Earth rotates on its own axis
And this means that all bodies are subject to the Coriolis force
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
8
Thus, the air masses rotate around the centres of low and high pressure
High pressurepolar, cold
Easterliescold
Westerlies, warm
High pressuresubtropical
warm
Polar
front
Low pressurezone
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
9
And end up moving
parallel to the isobars
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
Fou
fula
-Geo
rgio
u, 2
00
8
10
!"#$%#&#'()$*+'*,)(-+.&
+&$($'.-(-+&%$(-/.01"#'#
Forming a complex global circulation system
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
!"#$%#&#'()$*+'*,)(-+.&
/&$($'.-(-+&%$(-0.12"#'#
3#(-$-'(&14#'$56
7+'#*-$-"#'0()$*#))
3#(-$-'(&14#'$56
5('.*)+&+* 161-#01$
3#(-$-'(&14#'$56
5('.*)+&+* 161-#01$Fou
fula
-Geo
rgio
u, 2
00
8
11
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
12
The forces of the pressure gradient...Pressure, mb
Isobaric surfaces
surface of the ground
surface of the ground
Pressure, mb
pressure gradienthigher pressure
lower pressure
map at 1,000m altitude
isob
ar
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
13
...generate winds
The sea breeze
Sea Land
Day
Night
Sea Land
Plane
Valley
Plane
Valley
War
mW
arm
Col
dC
old
Pressure gradient
Pressure gradient
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
14The up-valley and down-valley winds
...generate winds
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
15
The hydrostatic equilibrium of the atmosphere
Column with section of unit area
Ground
Pressure = p + dp
Pressure = p
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
16
dp = −g(z) ρ(z)dz
The hydrostatic equilibrium of the atmosphere
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
16
dp = −g(z) ρ(z)dz
V a r i a t i o n i n pressure
The hydrostatic equilibrium of the atmosphere
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
16
dp = −g(z) ρ(z)dz
V a r i a t i o n i n pressure
Acce l e ra t i on due to gravity
The hydrostatic equilibrium of the atmosphere
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
16
dp = −g(z) ρ(z)dz
V a r i a t i o n i n pressure
Acce l e ra t i on due to gravity
Air density
The hydrostatic equilibrium of the atmosphere
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
16
dp = −g(z) ρ(z)dz
V a r i a t i o n i n pressure
Acce l e ra t i on due to gravity
Air density
Thickness of the air layer
The hydrostatic equilibrium of the atmosphere
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
17
dp = −g(z) ρ(z)dz
Ideal Gas Law
ρ(z) =p(z)
R T (z)
The hydrostatic equilibrium of the atmosphere
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
18
dp = −g(z) ρ(z)dz
Temperature
Pressureρ(z) =
p(z)R T (z)
The hydrostatic equilibrium of the atmosphere
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
18
dp = −g(z) ρ(z)dz
Air constant
Temperature
Pressureρ(z) =
p(z)R T (z)
The hydrostatic equilibrium of the atmosphere
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
18
dp = −g(z) ρ(z)dz
Air constant
Temperature
Air density
Pressureρ(z) =
p(z)R T (z)
The hydrostatic equilibrium of the atmosphere
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
19
dp(z) = −g(z)p(z)
R T (z)dz
dp
p= −g(z)
p(z)R T (z)
dz
� p(z)
p(0)
dp
p= −
� z
0g(z)
p(z)R T (z)
dz
The hydrostatic equilibrium of the atmosphere
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
20
logp(z)p(0)
= −� z
0
g(z)R T (z)
dz
logp(z)p(0)
≈ g
R
� z
0
1T (z)
dz
The hydrostatic equilibrium of the atmosphere
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
The first law of thermodynamicswith the help of the second
U = U(S, V )
Equilibrium thermodynamics states that the internal energy of a system is a
function of Entropy and Volume:
As a consequence, every variation in internal energy is given by:
∂U()∂S
:= T (S, V )
dU() = T ()dS − pU ()dV
∂U()∂V
:= −pU (S, V )
21
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
The first law of thermodynamicswith the help of the second
U = U(S, V )
Equilibrium thermodynamics states that the internal energy of a system is a
function of Entropy and Volume:
As a consequence, every variation in internal energy is given by:
∂U()∂S
:= T (S, V )
Temperature
dU() = T ()dS − pU ()dV
∂U()∂V
:= −pU (S, V )
21
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
The first law of thermodynamicswith the help of the second
U = U(S, V )
Equilibrium thermodynamics states that the internal energy of a system is a
function of Entropy and Volume:
As a consequence, every variation in internal energy is given by:
∂U()∂S
:= T (S, V )
Temperature pressure
dU() = T ()dS − pU ()dV
∂U()∂V
:= −pU (S, V )
21
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
U = U(S, V )
Variation of internal energy
heat exchanged by the system
work done by the system
dU() = T ()dS − pU ()dV
The first law of thermodynamicswith the help of the second
As a consequence, every variation in internal energy is given by:
22
Equilibrium thermodynamics states that the internal energy of a system is a
function of Entropy and Volume:
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
UT := U(S(T, V ), V )
However, while temperature is directly measurable, entropy is not - a
consequence of the second law of thermodynamics. For this reason it is
preferred to express entropy as a function of temperature, by means of a
change of variables. In this case, it should be observed that entropy is not
solely a function of temperature, but also of volume:
pS() :=∂U()∂S
∂S()∂V
dUT = CV ()dT + (pS()− pU ())dV
The first law of thermodynamicswith the help of the second
23
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
UT := U(S(T, V ), V )
However, while temperature is directly measurable, entropy is not - a
consequence of the second law of thermodynamics. For this reason it is
preferred to express entropy as a function of temperature, by means of a
change of variables. In this case, it should be observed that entropy is not
solely a function of temperature, but also of volume:
Entropic PressurepS() :=
∂U()∂S
∂S()∂V
dUT = CV ()dT + (pS()− pU ())dV
The first law of thermodynamicswith the help of the second
23
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
The sum of the two pressures, entropic ed energetic, if so they can be defined,
is the normal pressure:
p() := pS()− pU ()
The first law of thermodynamicswith the help of the second
24
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
By definition (!) the internal energy of an ideal gas does NOT explicitly
depend on the volume. Therefore:
Variation of internal energy
heat exchanged by the system
U = U(S)
dU() = T ()dS !!!!!!! =⇒ dQ() = dU()
The first law of thermodynamicswith the help of the second
As a consequence, every variation in internal energy is given by:
25
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
Therefore, for an ideal gas:
CV () :=∂UT
∂T
or:
dividing the expression by the mass of air present in the volume:
dUT = dQ() = CV ()dT + ps()dV
dUT = CV ()dT + d(ps() V )− V dps()
The first law of thermodynamicswith the help of the second
26
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
Therefore, for an ideal gas:
CV () :=∂UT
∂T
or:
dividing the expression by the mass of air present in the volume:
dUT = dQ() = CV ()dT + ps()dV
dUT = CV ()dT + d(ps() V )− V dps()
The first law of thermodynamicswith the help of the second
26
specific heat at constant volume
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
v :=1ρ
duT = cV ()dT + d(ps() v)− v dps()
dividing the expression by the mass of air present in the volume:
The first law of thermodynamicswith the help of the second
27
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
v :=1ρ
specific volume
duT = cV ()dT + d(ps() v)− v dps()
dividing the expression by the mass of air present in the volume:
The first law of thermodynamicswith the help of the second
27
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
And using the ideal gas law per unit of mass:
ps() v = R T
The following results:
duT = cV ()dT + d(R T )− v dps()
duT = cV ()dT − d(ps() v) + v dps()
The first law of thermodynamicswith the help of the second
28
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
Which can be rewritten as (in this case being du = dq):
During isobaric transformations, by definition, dp() = 0, and
dq|p = (cV () + R) dT = cpdT
cp() := cv() + R
cp is known as specific heat at constant pressure
dq = (cV () + R) dT − v dp()
The first law of thermodynamicswith the help of the second
29
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
Adiabatic lapse rate
The information given in the first law of thermodynamics can be
combined with that obtained from the law of hydrostatics. In fact,
assuming that a rising parcel of air is subject to an adiabatic
process, then:
v dps() = −g dz
dq() = cp() dT + v dps()
dq() = 0
30
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
Resolving the previous system results in:
dT
dz= −Γd
Γd :=g
cp≈ 9.8◦K Km−1
Adiabatic lapse rate
31
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
32
So what happens when a balloon rises?
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
33
The conditions of atmospheric stability
Temperature
STABLE AIR
Temperature
Altitude Temperature
GROUND LEVEL
1. The wind pushes the parcels of air at 21°C up the hill
2. The moving air cools to 18.3°C
3. The air is cooler than the surrounding air and therefore it drops
Alti
tude
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
34
The conditions of atmospheric stability
Temperature
STABLE AIR
Temperature
Altitude Temperature
GROUND LEVEL
1. The wind pushes the parcels of air at 21°C up the hill
2. The moving air cools to 18.3°C
3. The air is cooler than the surrounding air and therefore it drops
Alti
tude
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
35
The conditions of atmospheric stability
Temperature
STABLE AIR
Temperature
Altitude Temperature
GROUND LEVEL
1. The wind pushes the parcels of air at 21°C up the hill
2. The moving air cools to 18.3°C
3. The air is cooler than the surrounding air and therefore it drops
Alti
tude
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
36
The conditions of atmospheric instability
Temperature
UNSTABLE AIR
Altitude Temperature
GROUND LEVEL
1. The wind pushes the parcels of air at 21°C up the hill
2. The moving air cools to 18.1°C
3. The air is warmer than the surrounding air and therefore continues to rise
4. The air at 15.1°C continues to rise
5. The air at 12.1°C continues to rise
6. The air at 9.1°C continues to rise
Alti
tude
At altitude the air is relatively cool
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
37
The conditions of atmospheric instability
Temperature
UNSTABLE AIR
Altitude Temperature
GROUND LEVEL
1. The wind pushes the parcels of air at 21°C up the hill
2. The moving air cools to 18.1°C
3. The air is warmer than the surrounding air and therefore continues to rise
4. The air at 15.1°C continues to rise
5. The air at 12.1°C continues to rise
6. The air at 9.1°C continues to rise
Alti
tude
At altitude the air is relatively cool
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
38
What happens when water vapour is added?
The water content of the atmosphere is specified by the mixing
ratio w : w =
Mv
Md=
ρv
ρd
where Mv is the mass of vapour and Md is the mass of dry air.
Alternatively, one can refer to the specific humidity, q:
q =Mv
Md + Mv=
ρv
ρd + ρv≈ w
where the last equality is valid for Mv<<Md, which is generally true.
Given that humid air can be considered, in good approximation, an
ideal gas its degrees of freedom are restricted once more by the
ideal gas law:p = ρRT
where the value of the constant depends on the humidity. At the
extremes the values are Rd=287J.K-1kg-1 for dry air and
Rv=461J.K-1kg-1 for vapour.
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
39
What happens when water vapour is added?
Let us now introduce a thermodynamic parameter, the potential
temperature θ, that takes account of this phenomenon. It is
defined as the temperature of a parcel of air that has moved
adiabatically from a starting point with temperature T and
pressure p to a reference altitude (and therefore reference
pressure), conventionally set at p0=1,000hPa (sea level). In other
words it describes an adiabatic transformation from (p,T) to
(p0, θ). Qualitatively, the potential temperature represents a
temperature correction based on the altitude.
θv = Tv
�p0
p
�Rd/cop
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
40
Conditional stability
Alti
tude
Temperature
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
41
Conditional stability
Alti
tude
Temperature
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
42
Conditional stability
Alti
tude
Temperature
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
!"#$%$&$'%('#()*+,
!"##$%&'()"&*&+,-."#
+()/&'()"&*&0)1(-$)2")3
+$4(3(1"&5-",&*&65+0
Fou
fula
-Geo
rgio
u, 2
00
8
43
CAPEconvective available potential energy
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
44
The temporal variability of stability
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
45
The temporal variability of stability
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
FREE TROPOSPHERE
RESIDUAL
LAYER
STABLE LAYER
MIXED LAYERB
L G
row
th
Eddies/Plumes
STABLE LAYER
RESIDUAL
LAYER
Entrainment
Diurnal Evolution of the ABL
Kumar et al., WRRKumar et al. WRR, 2006
Kleissl et al. WRR, 2006Albertson and P., WRR, AWR 1999
46
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Stable vs. Convective Boundary Layer (Potential Temp.)
SBL
CBL
Fou
fula
-Geo
rgio
u, 2
00
8
Precipitations
47
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
48
The temporal variability of stability
Alti
tude
(km
)Inversion layer
Alti
tude
(km
)
Surface layer
Surface layer
Mixed layer
Inversion layer
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
The mechanisms of precipitation formation:
- Convective
- Frontal
- Orographic
49
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
The convective mechanism
50
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
51
The convective mechanism
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Th
e fr
on
tal
mec
han
ism
52
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Fou
fula
-Geo
rgio
u, 2
00
8
53
!"#$%#&#'()$*+'*,)(-+.&
+&$($'.-(-+&%$(-/.01"#'#Deja Vu
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Atmospheric Physics
Riccardo Rigon
54
High pressurepolar, cold
Easterliescold
Westerlies, warm
High pressuresubtropical
warm
Polar
front
Low pressurezone
Dej
a V
u
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
55
Th
e fr
on
tal
mec
han
ism
Initial stage Open stage
Occlusion stage DIssolution stage
Warm air(less dense)
Cold air(dense)
Cold air
Warm air
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
56
Th
e oro
gra
ph
ic m
ech
anis
m
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Passage of low pressure center over mountains
Whiteman (2000)
57
Th
e oro
gra
ph
ic m
ech
anis
m
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
58
Th
e oro
gra
ph
ic m
ech
anis
m
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
T=318 min
Rainfall evolution over topography
Fou
fula
-Geo
rgio
u, 2
00
8
59
Rainfall evolution over topography
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
T=516 min
Rainfall evolution over topography
60
Rainfall evolution over topography
Fou
fula
-Geo
rgio
u, 2
00
8
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
T=672 min
Rainfall evolution over topography
61
Fou
fula
-Geo
rgio
u, 2
00
8
Rainfall evolution over topography
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
A. A
dam
s -
Pio
ggia
Ten
aya,
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Why it rains
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Why it rains
•Large-scale atmospheric movements are caused by the variability of solar
radiation at the Earth’s surface, due to the spherical shape of the Earth.
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Why it rains
•Large-scale atmospheric movements are caused by the variability of solar
radiation at the Earth’s surface, due to the spherical shape of the Earth.
•Also, given the rotation of the Earth about its own axis, every air mass in
movement is deflected because of the (apparent) Coriolis force.
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Why it rains
•Large-scale atmospheric movements are caused by the variability of solar
radiation at the Earth’s surface, due to the spherical shape of the Earth.
•This situation:
•generates movements between “quasi-stable” positions of high and low
pressures
•causes large-scale discontinuities in the air’s flow field and discontinuities
of the thermodynamic properties of the air masses in contact with one
another
•generates, therefore, the situation where the lighter masses of air “slide”
over heavier ones, being lifted upwards in the process.
•Also, given the rotation of the Earth about its own axis, every air mass in
movement is deflected because of the (apparent) Coriolis force.
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Why it rains
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
•The surface of the Earth is composed of various material masses (air, water,
soil) that are oriented differently. They each respond to solar radiation in
different ways causing further movements of the air masses (at the scale of the
variability that presents itself) in order to redistribute the incoming radiant
energy.
Why it rains
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
•The surface of the Earth is composed of various material masses (air, water,
soil) that are oriented differently. They each respond to solar radiation in
different ways causing further movements of the air masses (at the scale of the
variability that presents itself) in order to redistribute the incoming radiant
energy.
•Because of these movements, localised lifting of air masses can occur.
Why it rains
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
•The surface of the Earth is composed of various material masses (air, water,
soil) that are oriented differently. They each respond to solar radiation in
different ways causing further movements of the air masses (at the scale of the
variability that presents itself) in order to redistribute the incoming radiant
energy.
•Because of these movements, localised lifting of air masses can occur.
•Moving masses of air are lifted by the presence of orography.
Why it rains
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
•The surface of the Earth is composed of various material masses (air, water,
soil) that are oriented differently. They each respond to solar radiation in
different ways causing further movements of the air masses (at the scale of the
variability that presents itself) in order to redistribute the incoming radiant
energy.
•Because of these movements, localised lifting of air masses can occur.
•Moving masses of air are lifted by the presence of orography.
• Heating of the Earth’s surface also causes air to be lifted, causing conditions
of atmospheric instability.
Why it rains
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Why it rains
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
•As air rises it cools, due to adiabatic (isentropic) expansion, and the
equilibrium vapour pressure is reduced. Hence, the condensation of water
vapour becomes possible (though not always probable).
Why it rains
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
•As air rises it cools, due to adiabatic (isentropic) expansion, and the
equilibrium vapour pressure is reduced. Hence, the condensation of water
vapour becomes possible (though not always probable).
•In this way, at a suitable altitude above the ground, clouds are formed: particles
of liquid or solid water suspended in the air.
Why it rains
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
•As air rises it cools, due to adiabatic (isentropic) expansion, and the
equilibrium vapour pressure is reduced. Hence, the condensation of water
vapour becomes possible (though not always probable).
•In this way, at a suitable altitude above the ground, clouds are formed: particles
of liquid or solid water suspended in the air.
Why it rains
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
•As air rises it cools, due to adiabatic (isentropic) expansion, and the
equilibrium vapour pressure is reduced. Hence, the condensation of water
vapour becomes possible (though not always probable).
•In this way, at a suitable altitude above the ground, clouds are formed: particles
of liquid or solid water suspended in the air.
Storm building near Arvada, Colorado. U.S. © Brian Boyle.
Why it rains
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
•If the particles are able to increase in size to the point of reaching sufficient
weight they precipitate to the ground. Rain, snow or hail.
Precipitation, Thriplow in Cambridgeshire. U.K © John Deed.
Why it rains
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Event types- Stratiform
67
Ove
r Ber
wic
k-up
on-T
wee
d, N
orth
umbe
rland
, UK
.©
Ant
onio
Fec
i
Stra
tocu
mul
us st
ratif
orm
is
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Event types- Convective
68
Ove
r Aus
tin, T
exas
, US
© G
inni
e Po
wel
l
Cum
ulon
imbu
s cap
illat
us in
cus
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Stratiform clouds
69
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
70
Stratiform clouds
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Extr
atro
pic
al c
ycl
on
e
71
Hou
ze,
1
99
4
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Cloudbursts
72
Hou
ze,
1
99
4
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
73
Hou
ze,
1
99
4
Cloudbursts
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Factors that influence the nature and quantity of precipitation at the ground
•Latitude: precipitations are distributed over the surface of the Earth in
function of the general circulation systems.
•Altitude: precipitation (mean annual) tends to grow with altitude - up to a
limit (the highest altitudes are arid, on average).
•Position with respect to the oceanic masses, the prevalent winds, and the
general orographic position.
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
F. G
iorg
iou
, 2
00
8
75
Spat
ial
dis
trib
uti
on
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
76
Spat
ial
dis
trib
uti
on
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Precipitation exhibits spatial variability at a large range of scales
(mm/hr)
512 k
m
pixel = 4 km
0 4 9 13 17 21 26 30R (mm/hr)
2
km
4
km
pixel = 125 m
Fou
fula
-Geo
rgio
u, 2
00
8
77
Spat
ial
dis
trib
uti
on
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
!"#$%#&'(#%)*#&&
Fou
fula
-Geo
rgio
u, 2
00
8
78
Spat
ial
dis
trib
uti
on
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Spatial distribution
79
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Characteristics of precipitation at the ground
•The physical state (rain, snow, hail, dew)
•Depth: the quantity of precipitation per unit area (projection),
often expressed in mm or cm.
•Duration: the time interval during which continuous precipitation is
registered, or, depending on the context, the duration to register a
certain amount of precipitation (independently of its continuity)
•Cumulative depth, the depth of precipitation measured in a pre-fixed
time interval, even if due to more than one event.
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
•Storm inter-arrival time
•The spatial distribution of the rain volumes
•The frequency or return period of a certain precipitation event with
assigned depth and duration
•The quality, that is to say the chemical composition of the
precipitation
Characteristics of precipitation at the ground
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Events
1
2 3
4
5 6
82
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
!"#$%&'()*'+,-'((
Fou
fula
-Geo
rgio
u, 2
00
8
83
Temporal Rainfall Questo titolo era gia in inglese e l’ho lasciato - ma non mi e` chiaro!JT
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
84
Mon
thly
pre
cip
itat
ion
h
isto
gra
ms
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Stat
isti
cs
85
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
86
Du
rati
on
sa
logn
orm
al d
istr
ibu
tion
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
87
Inte
nsi
tylo
gn
orm
al ?
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
88
Extr
eme
pre
cip
itat
ion
s
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Kan
din
ski
-Com
posi
tion
VI
(Il
dil
uvi
o)-
19
13
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Objectives:
90
•Describe extreme precipitation events and their characteristics
•Calculate the extreme precipitations of assigned return period with R
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Let is consider the maximum annual precipitationsThese can be found in hydrological records, registered by characteristic durations:
1h, 3h, 6h,12h 24 h and they represent the maximum cumulative rainfall over the
pre-fixed time.
91
year 1h 3h 6h 12h 24h1 1925 50.0 NA NA NA NA2 1928 35.0 47.0 50.0 50.4 67.6
......................................
......................................
46 1979 38.6 52.8 54.8 70.2 84.247 1980 28.2 42.4 71.4 97.4 107.451 1987 32.6 40.6 64.6 77.2 81.252 1988 89.2 102.0 102.0 102.0 104.2
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
92
Let is consider the maximum annual precipitations
for each duration there is a precipitation distribution
Precipitazioni Massime a Paperopoli
durata
Pre
cip
ita
zio
ne
(m
m)
1 3 6 12 24
50
100
150
50
100
150
Pre
cipi
tatio
n (m
m)
Duration
Maximum Precipitations at Toontown
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
1 3 6 12 24
50
100
150
Precipitazioni Massime a Paperopoli
durata
Pre
cip
itazio
ne (
mm
)
Median
>boxplot(hh ~ h,xlab="duration",ylab="Precipitation (mm)",main="Maximum Precipitations at Toontown") 93
Let is consider the maximum annual precipitations
Pre
cipi
tatio
n (m
m)
Duration
Maximum Precipitations at Toontown
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
1 3 6 12 24
50
100
150
Precipitazioni Massime a Paperopoli
durata
Pre
cip
itazio
ne (
mm
)
upper quantile
94
Let is consider the maximum annual precipitations
Pre
cipi
tatio
n (m
m)
Duration
Maximum Precipitations at Toontown
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
1 3 6 12 24
50
100
150
Precipitazioni Massime a Paperopoli
durata
Pre
cip
itazio
ne (
mm
)
lower quantile
95
Let is consider the maximum annual precipitations
Pre
cipi
tatio
n (m
m)
Duration
Maximum Precipitations at Toontown
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
1 ora
Precipitazion in mm
Frequenza
20 40 60 80
05
10
15
20
25
3 ore
Precipitazion in mm
Frequenza
20 40 60 80 100
05
10
15
6 ore
Precipitazion in mm
Frequenza
40 60 80 1000
510
15
96
Freq
uenc
y
Precipitation (mm)
Freq
uenc
y
Freq
uenc
y
Precipitation (mm) Precipitation (mm)
6 hours 3 hour 1 hour
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
12 ore
Precipitazion in mm
Frequenza
40 60 80 100 120
02
46
8
24 ore
Precipitazion in mm
Frequenza
40 80 120 160
02
46
810
12
97
Freq
uenc
y
Precipitation (mm)
12 hours
Freq
uenc
y
Precipitation (mm)
24 hours
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Return period
It is the average time interval in which a certain precipitation intensity is
repeated (or exceeded).
Let:
T
be the time interval for which a certain measure is available.
Let:
n
be the measurements made in T.
And let:
m=T/n
be the sampling interval of a single measurement (the duration of the event in
consideration).
98
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Then, the return period for the depth h* is:
99
where Fr= l/n is the success frequency (depths greater or equal to h*).
If the sampling interval is unitary (m=1), then the return period is the
inverse of the exceedance frequency for the value h*.
Tr :=T
l= n
m
l=
m
ECDF (h∗) =m
1− Fr(H < h∗)
N.B. On the basis of the above, there is a bijective relation between
quantiles and return period
Return period
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
1 3 6 12 24
50
100
150
Precipitazioni Massime a Paperopoli
durata
Pre
cip
itazio
ne (
mm
)
Median -> q(0.5) -> Tr = 2 yearsq(0.25) -> Tr = 1.33 years
100
Pre
cipi
tatio
n (m
m)
Duration
Maximum Precipitations at Toontown
q(0.75) -> Tr = 4 years
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
h(tp, Tr) = a(Tr) tnp
101
Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency (DDF) curves
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
h(tp, Tr) = a(Tr) tnp
102
depth of precipitation
power law
Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency (DDF) curves
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
h(tp, Tr) = a(Tr) tnp
103
coefficient dependent on the return period
depth of precipitation
Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency (DDF) curves
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
h(tp, Tr) = a(Tr) tnp
104
duration considered
depth of precipitation
Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency (DDF) curves
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
h(tp, Tr) = a(Tr) tnp
105
exponent (not dependent on t h e r e t u r n period)
depth of precipitation
Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency (DDF) curves
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
h(tp, Tr) = a(Tr) tnp
Given that the depth of cumulated precipitation is a non-decreasing function
of duration, it therefore stands that n >0
Also, it is known that average intensity of precipitation:
J(tp, Tr) :=h(tp, Tr)
tp= a(Tr) tn−1
p
decreases as the duration increases. Therefore, we also have n < 1
Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency (DDF) curves
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Tr = 50 years a = 36.46 n = 0.472 Tr = 100 years a = 40.31Tr = 200 years a = 44.14
curve di possibilità pluviometrica
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
1 10 100tp[h]
log(prec) [mm]
tr=50 annitr=100 annitr=200 annia 50a 100a 200
107
Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency (DDF) curves
Tr=50 years
Tr=100 years
Tr=200 years
DDF Curve
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
curve di possibilità pluviometrica
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
1 10 100tp[h]
log(prec) [mm]
tr=50 annitr=100 annitr=200 annia 50a 100a 200
DDF curves are parallel to each other in the bilogarithmic plane
108
Tr=50 years
Tr=100 years
Tr=200 years
DDF Curve
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
curve di possibilità pluviometrica
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
1 10 100tp[h]
log(prec) [mm]
tr=50 annitr=100 annitr=200 annia 50a 100a 200
tr = 500 years
tr = 200 yearsh(,500) > h(200)
109
DDF curves are parallel to each other in the bilogarithmic plane
Tr=50 years
Tr=100 yearsTr=200 years
DDF Curve
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
curve di possibilità pluviometrica
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
1 10 100tp[h]
log(prec) [mm]
tr=50 annitr=100 annitr=200 annia 50a 100a 200
tr = 500 years tr = 200 years
Invece h(,500) < h(200) !!!!
110
DDF curves are parallel to each other in the bilogarithmic plane
Tr=50 years
Tr=100 yearsTr=200 years
DDF Curve
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
The problem to solve using probability theory and statistical analysis...
...is, therefore, to determine, for each duration, the correspondence between
quantiles (assigned return periods) and the depth of precipitation
For each duration, the data will need to be interpolated to a probability distribution. The family of distribution curves suitable to this scope is the Type I Extreme Value Distribution, or the Gumbel Distribution
b is a form parameter, a is a position parameter (it is, in effect, the mode)
P [H < h; a, b] = e−e−
h−ab −∞ < h <∞
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Gumbel Distribution
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Gumbel Distribution
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
The distribution mean is given by:
E[X] = bγ + a
where:
is the Euler-Mascheroni constant
γ ≈ 0.57721566490153228606
Gumbel Distribution
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
The median:
The variance:
a− b log(log(2))
V ar(X) = b2 π2
6
Gumbel Distribution
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
The standard form of the distribution (with respect to which there are tables
of the significant values) is
P [Y < y] = ee−y
Gumbel Distribution
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
117
Gumbel Distribution
which yields:
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
In order to adapt the family of Gumbel distributions to the data of interest methods of adjusting the parameters are used.
We shall use three:
- The method of the least squares
- The method of moments
- The method of maximum likelihood
Let us consider, therefore, a series of n measures, h = {h1, ....., hn}
118
Methods of adjusting parameterswith respect to the Gumbel distribution but having general validity
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
The method of moments consists in equalising the moments of the sample with the moments of the population. For example, let us consider
The mean and the variance and
the t-th moment of the SAMPLE
119
µH
σ2H
M (t)H
Methods of adjusting parameterswith respect to the Gumbel distribution but having general validity
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
If the probabilistic model has t parameters, then the method of
moments consists in equalising the t sample moments with the t
population moments, which are defined by:
In order to obtain a sufficient number of equations one must consider as
many moments as there are parameters. Even though, in principle, the resulting parameter function can be solved numerically by points, the method becomes effective when the integral in the second member admits an analytical solution.
120
MH [t; θ] =� ∞
−∞(h− EH [h])t pdfH(h; θ) dh t > 1
MH [1; θ] = EH [h] =� ∞
−∞h pdfH(h; θ) dh
Methods of adjusting parameterswith respect to the Gumbel distribution but having general validity
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
The application of the method of moments to the Gumbel distribution
consists, therefore, in imposing:
or:
�bγ + a = µH
b2 π2
6 = σ2H
�MH [1; a, b] = µH
MH [2; a, b] = σ2H
Methods of adjusting parameterswith respect to the Gumbel distribution but having general validity
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
The method is based on the evaluation of the (compound) probability of
obtaining the recorded temporal series:
P [{h1, · · ·, hN}; a, b]
In the hypothesis of independence of observations, the probability is:
P [{h1, · · ·, hN}; a, b] =N�
i=1
P [hi; a, b]
The method of maximum likelihoodwith respect to the Gumbel distribution but having general validity
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
This probability is also called the likelihood function - it is evidently a
function of the parameters. In order to simplify calculation the log-
likelihood is also defined:
123
P [{h1, · · ·, hN}; a, b] =N�
i=1
P [hi; a, b]
log(P [{h1, · · ·, hN}; a, b]) =N�
i=1
log(P [hi; a, b])
The method of maximum likelihoodwith respect to the Gumbel distribution but having general validity
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
124
If the observed series is sufficiently long, it is assumed that it must be such that
the probability of observing it is maximum. Then, the parameters of the curve
that describe the population can be obtained from:
�∂ log(P [{h1,···,hN};a,b])
∂a = 0∂ log(P [{h1,···,hN};a,b])
∂b = 0
Which gives a system of two non-linear equations with two unknowns.
The method of maximum likelihoodwith respect to the Gumbel distribution but having general validity
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
125
e.g. Adjusting the Gumbel DistributionThe logarithm of the likelihood function, in this case, assumes the form:
Deriving with respect to u and α the following relations are obtained:
That is:
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
The method of least squares
It consists of defining the the standard deviation of the measures, the ECDF,
and the probability of non-exceedance:
δ2(θ) =
n�
i=1
(Fi − P [H < hi; θ])2
and then minimising it
126
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Standard deviation
The method of least squares
It consists of defining the the standard deviation of the measures, the ECDF,
and the probability of non-exceedance:
δ2(θ) =
n�
i=1
(Fi − P [H < hi; θ])2
and then minimising it
126
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
ECDFStandard deviation
The method of least squares
It consists of defining the the standard deviation of the measures, the ECDF,
and the probability of non-exceedance:
δ2(θ) =
n�
i=1
(Fi − P [H < hi; θ])2
and then minimising it
126
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
ProbabilityECDFStandard deviation
The method of least squares
It consists of defining the the standard deviation of the measures, the ECDF,
and the probability of non-exceedance:
δ2(θ) =
n�
i=1
(Fi − P [H < hi; θ])2
and then minimising it
126
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
∂δ2(θj)∂θj
= 0 j = 1 · · · m
The minimisation is obtained by deriving the standard deviation expression
with respect to the m parameters
so obtaining the m equations, with m unknowns, that are necessary.
127
The method of least squares
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
we have, as a result, three pairs of parameters which are all, to a certain extent, optimal. In order to distinguish which of these sets of parameters is the best we must use a confrontation criterion (a non-parametric test). We will use Pearson’s Test.
128
After the application of the various adjusting methods...
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Pearson’s test is NON-parametric and consists in:
1 - Sub-dividing the probability field into k parts. These can be, for example, of equal size.
129
Pearson’s Test
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
130
Pearson’s Test
Pearson’s test is NON-parametric and consists in:
2 - From this sub-division, deriving a sub-division of the domain.
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
131
Pearson’s Test
Pearson’s test is NON-parametric and consists in:
3 - Counting the number of data in each interval (of the five in the figure).
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
Pearson’s test is NON-parametric and consists in:
4 - Evaluating the function:
P [H < h0] = P [H < 0]
P [H < hn+1] = P [H <∞]
where:
in the case of the figure of the previous slides we have:
(P [H < hj+1]− P [H < hj ]) = 0.2
X2 =
1n + 1
n+1�
j=0
(Nj − n (P [H < hj+1]− P [H < hj ])2
n (P [H < hj+1]− P [H < hj ])
132
Pearson’s Test
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
0 50 100 150
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Precipitazione [mm]
P[h]
1h
3h
6h
12h
24h
133
After having applied Pearson’s test...
Precipitation (mm)
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
0 50 100 150
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Precipitazione [mm]
P[h]
1h
3h
6h
12h
24h
Tr = 10 anni
h1 h3 h6 h12 h24
134
After having applied Pearson’s test...
Precipitation (mm)
Tr = 10 years
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Linee Segnalitrici di Possibilita' Pluviometrica
h [mm]
t [o
re]
135
By interpolation one obtains...
DDF Curves
t (ho
urs)
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations
Riccardo Rigon
0.5 1.0 2.0 5.0 10.0 20.0
60
80
100
120
140
160
Linee Segnalitrici di Possibilita' Pluviometrica
t [ore]
h [
mm
]
136
By interpolation one obtains...
DDF Curves
t (hours)
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations - addendum
Riccardo Rigon
χ2
If a variable, X, is distributed normally with null mean and unit variance, then the variable
is distributed according to the “Chi squared” distribution (as proved by Ernst Abbe, 1840-1905) and it is indicated
which is a monoparametric distribution of the Gamma family of distributions. The only parameter is called “degrees of freedom”.
137
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations - addendum
Riccardo Rigon
In fact, the distribution is:
And its cumulated probability is:
where is the incomplete “gamma” functionγ()
χ2
from Wikipedia
138
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations - addendum
Riccardo Rigon
γ(s, z) :=� x
0ts−1 e−tdt
The incomplete gamma function
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations - addendum
Riccardo Rigon
χ2
from Wikipedia
140
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations - addendum
Riccardo Rigon
The expected value of the distribution is equal to the number of degrees of freedom
χ2
The variance is equal to twice the number of degrees of freedom
E(χk) = k
V ar(χk) = 2k
from Wikipedia
141
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations - addendum
Riccardo Rigon
Generally, the distribution is used in statistics to estimate the goodness of an
inference. Its general form is:
χ2
Assuming that the root of the variables represented in the summation has a
gaussian distribution, then it is expected that the sum of squares variable is
distributed according to with a number of degrees of freedom equal to
the number of addenda reduced by 1.
χ2
χ2
from Wikipedia
142
χ2=
� (Observed− Expected)2
Expected
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme precipitations - addendum
Riccardo Rigon
The distribution is important because we can make two mutually exclusive hypotheses. The null hypothesis:
χ2
It is conventionally assumed that the alternative hypothesis can be excluded from being valid if X^2 is inferior to the 0.05 quantile of the distribution with the appropriate number of degrees of freedom.
χ2
from Wikipedia
And its opposite, the alternative hypothesis:
that the sample and the population have the same distribution
that the sample and the population do NOT have the same distribution
χ2
143
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme Events - GEV
Riccardo Rigon
Mic
hel
angel
o, I
l d
ilu
vio,
15
08
-15
09
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme Events - GEV
Riccardo Rigon
A little more formally
The choice of the Gumbel distribution is not a whim, it is due to a Theorem which states that, under quite general hypotheses, the distribution of maxima chosen from samples that are sufficiently numerous can only belong to one of the following families of distributions:
I) The Gumbel Distribution
G(z) = e−e−z−b
a −∞ < z <∞a > 0
145
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme Events - GEV
Riccardo Rigon
II) The Frechèt Distribution
G(z) =
�0 z ≤ b
e−( z−ba )−α
z > b
α > 0a > 0
146
A little more formally
The choice of the Gumbel distribution is not a whim, it is due to a Theorem, which states that, under quite general hypotheses, the distribution of maxima chosen from samples that are sufficiently numerous can only belong to one of the following families of distributions:
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme Events - GEV
Riccardo Rigon
Mean
Mode
Median
Variance
P [X < x] = e−x−α
II) The Frechèt Distribution from Wikipedia
147
A little more formally
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme Events - GEV
Riccardo Rigon
dfrechet(x, loc=0, scale=1, shape=1, log = FALSE) pfrechet(q, loc=0, scale=1, shape=1, lower.tail = TRUE) qfrechet(p, loc=0, scale=1, shape=1, lower.tail = TRUE)rfrechet(n, loc=0, scale=1, shape=1)
R:
148
A little more formally
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme Events - GEV
Riccardo Rigon
α > 0a > 0
G(z) =
�e−[−( z−b
a )]−α
z < b1 z ≥ b
III) The Weibull Distribution
149
A little more formally
The choice of the Gumbel distribution is not a whim, it is due to a Theorem, which states that, under quite general hypotheses, the distribution of maxima chosen from samples that are sufficiently numerous can only belong to one of the following families of distributions:
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme Events - GEV
Riccardo Rigon
from Wikipedia
III) The Weibull Distribution(P. Rosin and E. Rammler, 1933)
150
A little more formally
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme Events - GEV
Riccardo Rigon
When k = 1, the Weibull distribution reduces to the exponential distribution. When k = 3.4, the Weibull distribution becomes very similar to the normal distribution.
Mean
Mode
Median
Variance
from Wikipedia
151
A little more formally
III) The Weibull Distribution(P. Rosin and E. Rammler, 1933)
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme Events - GEV
Riccardo Rigon
dweibull(x, shape, scale = 1, log = FALSE)pweibull(q, shape, scale = 1, lower.tail = TRUE, log.p = FALSE)qweibull(p, shape, scale = 1, lower.tail = TRUE, log.p = FALSE)rweibull(n, shape, scale = 1)
R:
152
A little more formally
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme Events - GEV
Riccardo Rigon
For the distribution reduces to the Gumbel distribution
For the distribution becomes a Frechèt distribution
For the distribution becomes a Weibull distribution
ξ = 0ξ > 0ξ < 0
The aforementioned theorem can be reformulated in terms of a three-parameter distribution called the Generalised Extreme Values (GEV) Distribution.
G(z) = e−[1+ξ( z−µσ )]−1/ξ
z : 1 + ξ(z − µ)/σ > 0−∞ < µ <∞ σ > 0
−∞ < ξ <∞
153
A little more formally
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme Events - GEV
Riccardo Rigon
G(z) = e−[1+ξ( z−µσ )]−1/ξ
z : 1 + ξ(z − µ)/σ > 0−∞ < µ <∞ σ > 0
−∞ < ξ <∞
154
A little more formally
The aforementioned theorem can be reformulated in terms of a three-parameter distribution called the Generalised Extreme Values (GEV) Distribution.
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme Events - GEV
Riccardo Rigon
gk = Γ(1− kξ)
155
A little more formally
The aforementioned theorem can be reformulated in terms of a three-parameter distribution called the Generalised Extreme Values (GEV) Distribution.
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Extreme Events - GEV
Riccardo Rigon
dgev(x, loc=0, scale=1, shape=0, log = FALSE) pgev(q, loc=0, scale=1, shape=0, lower.tail = TRUE) qgev(p, loc=0, scale=1, shape=0, lower.tail = TRUE)rgev(n, loc=0, scale=1, shape=0)
R
156
A little more formally
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Bibliography and Further Reading
Riccardo Rigon
•Albertson, J., and M. Parlange, Surface Length Scales and Shear Stress: Implications
for Land-Atmosphere Interaction Over Complex Terrain, Water Resour. Res., vol. 35,
n. 7, p. 2121-2132, 1999
•Burlando, P. and R. Rosso, (1992) Extreme storm rainfall and climatic change,
Atmospheric Res., 27 (1-3), 169-189.
•Burlando, P. and R. Rosso, (1993) Stochastic Models of Temporal Rainfall:
Reproducibility, Estimation and Prediction of Extreme Events, in: Salas, J.D., R.
Harboe, e J. Marco-Segura (eds.), Stochastic Hydrology in its Use in Water Resources
Systems Simulation and Optimization, Proc. of NATO-ASI Workshop, Peniscola,
Spain, September 18-29, 1989, Kluwer, pp. 137-173.
Bibliography and Further Reading
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Bibliography and Further Reading
Riccardo Rigon
•Burlando, P. e R. Rosso, (1996) Scaling and multiscaling Depth-Duration-Frequency
curves of storm precipitation, J. Hydrol., vol. 187/1-2, pp. 45-64.
•Burlando, P. and R. Rosso, (2002) Effects of transient climate change on basin
hydrology. 1. Precipitation scenarios for the Arno River, central Italy, Hydrol.
Process., 16, 1151-1175.
•Burlando, P. and R. Rosso, (2002) Effects of transient climate change on basin
hydrology. 2. Impacts on runoff variability of the Arno River, central Italy, Hydrol.
Process., 16, 1177-1199.
• Coles S.,ʻʻAn Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values, Springer,
2001
• Coles, S., and Davinson E., Statistical Modelling of Extreme Values, 2008
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Bibliography and Further Reading
Riccardo Rigon
•Foufula-Georgiou, Lectures at 2008 Summer School on Environmental Dynamics,
2008
•Fréchet M., Sur la loi de probabilité de l'écart maximum, Annales de la Société
Polonaise de Mathematique, Crocovie, vol. 6, p. 93-116, 1927
•Gumbel, On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in
the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably
supposed to have arisen from random sampling, Phil. Mag. vol. 6, p. 157-175, 1900
• Houze, Clouds Dynamics, Academic Press, 1994
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Bibliography and Further Reading
Riccardo Rigon
• Kleissl J., V. Kumar, C. Meneveau, M. B. Parlange, Numerical study of dynamic
Smagorinsky models in large-eddy simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer:
Validation in stable and unstable conditions, Water Resour. Res., 42, W06D10, doi:
10.1029/2005WR004685, 2006
•Kottegoda and R. Rosso, Applied statistics for civil and environmental engineers,
Blackwell, 2008
•Kumar V., J. Kleissl, C. Meneveau, M. B. Parlange, Large-eddy simulation of a diurnal
cycle of the atmospheric boundary layer: Atmospheric stability and scaling issues,
Water Resour. Res., 42, W06D09, doi:10.1029/2005WR004651, 2006
•Lettenmaier D., Stochastic modeling of precipitation with applications to climate
model downscaling, in von Storch and, Navarra A., Analysis of Climate Variability:
Applications and Statistical Techniques,1995
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Bibliography and Further Reading
Riccardo Rigon
•Salzman, William R. (2001-08-21). "Clapeyron and Clausius–Clapeyron
Equations" (in English). Chemical Thermodynamics. University of Arizona. Archived
from the original on 2007-07-07. http://web.archive.org/web/20070607143600/
http://www.chem.arizona.edu/~salzmanr/480a/480ants/clapeyro/clapeyro.html.
Retrieved 2007-10-11.
•von Storch H, and Zwiers F. W, Statistical Analysis in climate Research, Cambridge
University Press, 2001
•Whiteman, Mountain Meteorology, Oxford University Press, p. 355, 2000
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Self-Similar Distributions
Riccardo Rigon
Thank you for your attention!
G.U
lric
i -
Uom
o d
op
e av
er l
avora
to a
lle
slid
es ,
20
00
?
Saturday, September 11, 2010