86 scott elaurant.pptx
-
Upload
jumpingjaq -
Category
Business
-
view
155 -
download
0
description
Transcript of 86 scott elaurant.pptx
![Page 1: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Politics, Finance and TransportAITPM 2014 THE NEED FOR SYSTEMATIC REFORM
Scott Elaurant and William McDougall
![Page 2: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview
1. Introduction
2. Transport funding – the macro level
3. Choosing the right project: modes and ideologies
4. Delivering the project right
5. A better approach
![Page 3: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction
• Transport funding: is the funding level correct?
• Project selection: do we allocate the funds to the right projects?
• Project delivery: do we spend the funds well?
![Page 4: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Transport funding trend since 2001
• Below long term average up to 2006
• Rapid increase in stimulus for GFC
• Urban transport funds less; includes PPPs
Price Waterhouse Coopers for Business Council of Australia
![Page 5: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Transport funding: is it enough?
• Australia population +1.5% p.a. (OECD +0.7%)
• Australian GDP +2.6% p.a. (OECD +1.7%)
• Highly urbanised – growth is in cities
Department of Infrastructure and Transport, 2013
![Page 6: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Transport funding: international comparisons
• Australia is average in OECD
![Page 7: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Project selection: politics and ideology
![Page 8: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Road versus rail
• Decision still controversial
• Is there a consensus?
• Are preferences changing?
![Page 9: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Urban versus rural
• Do we build some projects simply because we want to spend money in that area?
Darwin-Alice Springs Railroad
![Page 10: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Political cycles
• Project priorities change with political cycles – causes delay and waste
• Inconsistency :
– Melbourne East West: road to rail to road– Brisbane CBD: busway to road to rail
• Delay:
– Sydney NW Rail, Perth LRT, Pacific Highway
![Page 11: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Ideology
• Ideological preferences
• Right wing governments tends to fund roads more
• Left wing tends to fund public transport more
“They underestimate the sense of mastery that many people gain from their car. The humblest person is king in his own car.”
Tony Abbott, Battlelines
![Page 12: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Politics and transport: trends
• Planning efforts wasted as priorities change with governments
• Major decisions made without analysis being made public
• Ideological preferences: transport mode, urban/rural
• Transport planners (hopefully) make decisions on technical grounds. Politicians do not!
![Page 13: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Project delivery: is it efficient?
Road across Blue Mountains, 1860s
![Page 14: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Construction price inflation
• Road cost index higher than inflation
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201260
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
InflationRoad Costs
![Page 15: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Megaprojects and Risk (Flyvjberg 2003)
• European evidence on large ($0.5 billion+) projects
• Large projects tend to have larger cost overruns (50 to 100%)
• Revenue and patronage tend to be overestimated (20 to 70%)
• Australia has built an increasing number of “megaprojects”…
![Page 16: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Australian megaproject outcomes
• Most recent large roads are PPP toll roads
• 5 of last 7 toll PPPs have gone bankruptProject PPP Year Cost ($M) Real Cost (2012 $M) PPP Outcome
Cross City Tunnel, Sydney Yes 2005 680 900 Bankrupt
M7 Motorway, Sydney Yes 2006 1,600 2,020 Profitable
Regional Fast Rail, Vic No 2006 840 1,060
Perth Mandurah Rail, Perth No 2007 1,700 2,080
Lane Cove Tunnel, Sydney Yes 2007 1,100 1,350 Bankrupt
Liverpool Parramatta T-Way, Sydney No 2007 990 1,210
East Link, Melbourne Yes 2008 2,500 2,890 Write off
Epping Chatswood Link, Sydney No 2009 2,200 2,360
Forrest Highway, Perth No 2009 705 760
Clem 7 Tunnel, Brisbane Yes 2010 3,200 3,460 Bankrupt
Gateway Upgrade, Brisbane No 2010 1,880 2,030
West Gate Freeway Upgrade, Melbourne No 2010 1,390 1,500
Airport Link, Brisbane Yes 2012 4,800 4,800 Bankrupt
Logan Motorway, Brisbane No 2012 1,950 1,950
Western Ring Road, Melbourne No 2013 980 970
Peninsula Link, Melbourne Yes 2013 760 750 On budget
![Page 17: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Managing project risk (Flyvjberg 2003)
• Decision maker & proponent independent
• Public scrutiny of decision process (transparency)
• Rigorous regulatory regime (accountability)
• Unguaranteed risk capital (risk transfer)
• Flyvjberg recommended changes to governance measures to control risk:
– measures mainly NOT done in Australia, – forecasting methodology reviewed
![Page 18: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
A better approach
• Political reform:
• Independent statutory body needed for infrastructure decisions
![Page 19: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
A better approach
• Financial and project governance reforms:
• More smaller projects?
• Guidelines for PPPs to include governance
• Revenue & funding consistent in long-term
• National policies needed for revenue
• Policy consistency needed over time for effectiveness in demand management
![Page 20: 86 scott elaurant.pptx](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081516/54d5d47c4a7959b6538b4615/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
www.jacobs.com | worldwide
Politics, Finance and TransportAITPM 2014 THE NEED FOR SYSTEMATIC REFORM
Scott Elaurant and William McDougall