7A A235 - DTIC · mentation of RAPs for the areas of concern, as well as direction for future...

7A

A235 280]U111111 Jlfil III llh MISCELLANEOUS PAPER EL-91-9

INFORMATION SUMMARY, AREA OF CONCERN:

6BUFFALO RIVER, NEW YORK

by

C. R. Lee, D. L. Brandon, J. W. Simmers,H. E. Tatem, J. G. Skogerboe

Environmental Laboratory

s o ST4A. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYWaterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers

3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, Mississippi 39180-6199

DTICELECTEAPR29 19911

March 1991Final Report

Approved For Public Release; Distribution Unlimited

Prepared for US Environmental Protection AgencyGreat Lakes National Program Office

Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediment ProgramChicago, Illinois 60604

Monitored by US Army Engineer Division, North CentralChicago, Illinois 60605-1592

91V

Destroy this report when no longer needed. Do not returnit to the originator

The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official

Department of the Army position unless so designatedby other authorized documents

The contents of this report are not to be used foradvertising, publication, or promotional purposesCitation of trade names does not constitute anofficial endorsement or approval of the use of

such corn nercial products.

Form ApprovedREPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMS No. 07040 18

bi0, reportig burden fri. Ihi-. 4ection of nfotmition is estimate to average I our per reponse, Including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing date sources.Puter nd mte;nihedata fttdedand optingareviewngthecect ,n 1onn~tion Send ommenits regarding this burden estimate or anv other aspect of thiscoiectoon r.i~ ifofmation, including ,o ns for reds' ng this burden tO Wasngton beadciuners Services. Directorate for information Operations and Reports. IIS5 JeffersonDavis HmWsihy, Suite 1204. Araigton. A l 2A.4302. and to the Offie of Management and Judget. Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188). Washington. DC 20503

1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blarJj 2. REPORT DATE " 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVEREDMarch 1991 Final report

4, TITLE AD SUBmLE S. FUNDING NUMBERS

Information Summary, Area of Concern: Buffalo River,New York

6. AUTHOR(S)C. R. Lee, D. L. Brandon, J. W. Simmers,H. E. Tatem, J. G. Skogerboe

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) . PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONREPORT NUMBER

USAE Waterways Experiment Station, EnvironmentalLaboratory, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS Miscellaneous Paper39180- 6199 EL-91-9

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORINGAGENCY REPORT NUMBER

US Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes NationalProgram Office, Chicago, IL 60604

USAE Division, North Central, Chicago, IL 60605-1592

11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

Available from National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road,Springfield, VA 22161

12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited

13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words)

The Water Quality Act of 1987, Section 118, authorizes the Great Lakes NationalProgram Office (GLNI-O) to carry out a 5-year study and demonstration project,Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediments (ARCS), with emphasis on theremoval of toxic pollutants from bottom sediments. Information from the ARCSprogram is to be used to guide the development of Remedial Action Plans (RAPs)for 42 identified Great Lakes Areas of Concern (AOCs) as well as Lake-wideManagement Plans. The AOCs are areas where serious impairment of beneficial usesof water or biota (drinking, swimming, fishing, navigation, etc.) is known toexist, or where environmental quality criteria are exceeded to the point thatsuch impairment is likely. Priority consideration was given to the followingAOCs: Saginaw Bay, Michigan; Sheboygan Harbor, Wisconsin; Grand Calumet River,Indiana; Ashtabula River, Ohio; and Buffalo River, New York.

(Continued)

14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES

See reverse 16. PRICE CODE

17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19, SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT

OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED I INSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev 2-89)

Prescribed by ANSI Sid Z3918298-102

13. (Concluded).

The Environmental Laboratory of the US Army Engineer Waterways ExperimentStation (WES) was asked to review existing data and information for each of thefive priority AOCs. The approach used by WES was to bring together WES scien-tists who have been conducting research on the various aspects of contaminantmobility in the aquatic environment and develop a list of information required toevaluate the potential for contaminant mobility. A team of WES scientists thenvisited the RAP coordinator and associated staff for each AOC. Corps Districtsresponsible for the navigation projects in each AOC were also visited.

This report summarizes the information obtained for the Buffalo River. Itis arranged for information retrieval by subject in a quick and easy manner(GLNPO Subject-Reference Matrix). Data and information from numerous reportshave been included as figures and tables; wherever possible, the referencesources are identified.

14. (Concluded).

Fish tissue concentrations Risk assessmentGroundwater Spills

Land use Toxicity bioassayMetal contamination Water qualityPesticidesPoint and nonpoint

source discharges

Accession For

NTIS GRA&IDTIC TAB 0Unannounced [5Justification,

By

Distribution/

Availability Codes

ivail and/orDist Special

"A

SUMMARY

The Water Quality Act of 1987, Section 118, authorizes the Great Lakes

National Program Office (GLNPO) to carry out a 5-year study and demonstration

project, Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediment (ARCS), with

emphasis on the removal of toxic pollutants from bottom sediments. Informa-

tion from the ARCS program is to be used to guide the development of Remedial

Action Plans (RAPs) for 42 identified Great Lakes Areas of Concern (AOC) as

well as Lake-wide Management Plans. The AOCs are areas where serious impair-

ment of beneficial uses of water or biota (drinking, swimming, fishing, navi-

gation, etc.) is known to exist, or where environmental quality criteria are

exceeded to the point that such impairment is likely.

Priority consideration was given to the following five AOCs: Saginaw

Bay, Michigan; Sheboygan Harbor, Wisconsin; Grand Calumet River, Indiana;

Ashtabula River, Ohio; and Buffalo River, New York.

The ARCS program is to be completed during the period 1988-1992. The

overall objectives of the program are to

a. Assess the nature and extent of bottom sediment contamination atselected Great Lakes AOC.

b. Evaluate and demonstrate remedial options, including removal,immobilization, and advanced treatment technologies, as well as"no-action" alternatives.

c. Provide guidance on assessment and remedial action to the variouslevels of government in the United States and Canada in the imple-mentation of RAPs for the areas of concern, as well as direction forfuture evaluations in other areas.

The Environmental Laboratory of the US Army Engineer Waterways Experi-

ment Station (WES) was asked to review existing data and information for each

of the five priority AOCs. The approach used by WES was to bring together WES

scientists who have been conducting research on the various aspects of contam-

inant mobility in the aquatic environment and develop a list of information

required to evaluate the potential for contaminant mobility (see Table 1 of

main text). All contaminant migration pathways were considered, as shown in

Figure I (main text). A team of WES scientists then visited the RAP coordina-

tor and associated staff for each AOC. Corps Districts responsible for the

navigation projects in each AOC were also visited. During these meetings,

discussions centered around what information was available for each item on

the list of information developed by WES. Sources of additional information

were obtained from the discussions.

1

This report summarizes the information obtained for the Buffalo River

AOC. It is arranged for information retrieval by subject in a quick and easy

manner (GLNPO Subject-Reference Matrix). Data and information from numerous

reports have been included as figures and tables; wherever possible, the

reference sources are identified.

2

PREFACE

The study reported herein was conducted by the US Army Engineer Water-

ways Experiment Station (WES) for the US Environmental Protection Agency

(USEPA) Great Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO). The work was monitored

by the US Army Engineer Division, North Central.

The report was prepared by Dr. C. R. Lee, Soil Scientist, Mr. D. L.

Brandon, Statistician, Dr. J. W. Simmers, Research Biologist, Dr. H. E. Tatem,

Aquatic Biologist, and Mr. J. G. Skogerboe, Physical Scientist, of the Contam-

inant Mobility and Regulatory Criteria Group (CMRCG), Ecosystem Research and

Simulation Division (ERSD), Environmental Laboratory (EL), WES.

Generous cooperation and assistance in locating existing data and infor-

mation were provided by Mr. R. Leonard, Agronomist; Mr. D. Melfi, Hydraulics

Engineer, and Mr. S. Yaksich, Chief, Water Quality Branch, US Army Engineer

District, Buffalo; Mr. J. McMahon, Chief, Division of Water, New York State

Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), Buffalo, NY; and Dr. Simon

Litten, Research Biologist, NYSDEC, Albany, NY. Mr. Larry Bird, ERSD, pro-

vided technical assistance in the preparation of tabulated data and the manu-

script for publication.

The work was conducted under the supervision of Dr. L. H, Saunders,

Chief, CMRCG; Mr. D. L. Robey, Chief, ERSD; and Dr. John Harrison, Chief, EL.

General supervision was provided by Mr. D. Cowgill, NCD, and Mr. T.

Kizlauskas, USEPA GLNPO, initially, and later by Mr. J. Miller, NCD, and

Mr. D. Cowgill, USEPA GLNPO.

Commander and Director of WES was COL Larry B. Fulton, EN. Technical

Director was Dr. Robert W. Whalin.

This report should be cited as follows:

Lee, C. R., Brandon, D. L., Simmers, J. W., Tatem, H. E., and Skogerboe,J. G. 1991. "Information Summary, Area of Concern: Buffalo River,"Miscellaneous Paper EL-91-9 , US Army Engineer Waterways ExperimentStation, Vicksburg, MS.

3

CONTENTS

SUMMARY . 1

PREFACE. .. ............... ................. 3

LIST OF TABLES .. ........ ...................... 5

LIST OF FIGURES. .. ....... ...................... 9

CONVERSION FACTORS, NON-SI TO SI (METRIC) UNITS OFMEASUREMENT .. ....... ................. ..... 11

INTRODUCTION. ........ ................. ..... 12

Background. ........ ..................... 12Purpose .. ........ ................. .... 12Scope .. ........ ................. ..... 13Abbreviations. .. ............... .......... 13

SUMMARY OF INFORMATION .. ............... ......... 13

Boundary of AOC. .. ............... ......... 13Contaminants of concern. .. ............... ..... 13Levels of contaminants .. ................ ..... 14Volume of contaminated sediments. ......... ........ 14Sediment data .. ....... .................... 14Water quality data .. .............. ......... 14Point source discharges. .. ............... ..... 15Nonpoint source discharges .. .................... 15Waterway hydraulics/watershed hydrology .. ........ ..... 15Air quality. .. ............... ........ 15Potential hazardous waste sites/Superfund sites. .. ........ 15spills. ......... ................ ..... 17Adjacent land use contaminant sources .. ........ ...... 18Bioassay data .. ....... .................... 18Biological data. .. .............. .......... 18Risk assessment. .. ............... ......... 19

GLNPO SUBJECT-REFERENCE MATRIX .. ............... ..... 20

REFERENCES. ......... ................ ...... 24

ADDITIONAL REFERENCES. .. ............... ......... 27

POINTS OF CONTACT .. ....... ..................... 28

APPENDIX 1: LITERATURE CITED .. ....... .............. 1-1

4

LIST OF TABLES

o.. T ...itle

1 Information Required to Evaluate the Potentl for Contaminant Mobility.

2 Contaminant Analyses Performed on Niagara River mbient Monitoring Sub-project Samples (Source R-21, Table 4.1).

3 Contaminants of Concern for the Buffalo River AOC.

4 Summary of Impairments, Causes and Sources (R-16).

5 Highest Concentration of Contaminants in Buffalo River AOC Sediments.

6 Highest Concentrations of Contaminants in Fish, Clams, Mussels, and AlgaExposed to Buffalo River AOC.

7 Ranges of Water Quality Parameters Measured in the Buffalo River AOC.

8 Atterberg Limits for the Analyzed Samples from October 30, 1987 (R-20,Table 5.3).

9 Water Contents Tests (R-20, Table 5.4).

10 Cation Exchange Capacity and Organic Matter Content of Analyzed Sam-ples of October 30, 1987 (R-20, Table 5.5).

11 Summary of Laboratory Test Results and Derived Quantities (R-20,Table 5.6).

12 Grain Size Fractions for Samples from October 30, 1987 and August 12,1981 (R-20, Table 5.7).

13 Historical Bulk Sediment Contaminant Concentrations-Buffalo River andBuffalo Ship Canal (R-22, Table 10).

14 Contaminant Concentrations in Buffalo River Bottom Sediments for Param-eters Quantified-USEPA Region V Sampling 1981 (R-16, Table A.3).

15 Contaminant Concentration in Bottom Sediments of Lake Erie and the Niag-ara River, Collected by MOE, 1979 (R-21, Table C.16).

16 Contaminant Concentrations in Bottom Sediments of the Niagara River Col-lected by IWD-OR, 1981 (R-21, Table C.17).

17a Contaminant Concentrations in Bottom Sediments of Buffalo Harbor Col-lected by USACOE, October 1981.

17b Buffalo Harbor Heavy Metals - Sediment Analysis (2, Table 3).

17c Buffalo Harbor (BH) Grain Size Data (2, Table 2).

18 Contaminant Concentrations in Buffalo River Bottom Sediments for Param-eters Quantified USACOE-Buffalo District Sampling - 1981 (R-16,Table A.3).

19 Sediment PAH Concentrations (ug/kg) Collected by NYSDEC in SubProject 3,1981 (R-7).

20 Contaminant Concentrations in Buffalo River Bottom Sediments for Param-eters Quantified NYSDEC Sampling-1983 (R-16, Table A.5).

21 Depths in Feet to Surface of River Bed in Buffalo River Sediment SurveyStudy (R-4).

5

No. Title

22 Core Length Collected in Buffalo River Sediment Survey Study (R-4,Table 12).

23a USACOE l9n3 Grain Size Data (4).

23b Total Sol:ds Contents of Samples (1, Table I).

23c Metals (1, Table II).

23d Non-Metals (1, Table III).

23e PCBS, Pesticides, and Phthalates (1, Table IV).

23f Aromatic Hydrocarbons (1, Table V).

23g Contaminant Concentrations in Buffalo River Bottom Sediments for Param-eters Quantified, Erie County Sampling-1985 (R-16, Table A.6).

23h Buffalo River Sediments - 1989 Data (3).

24 Summary of Water Quality Monitoring Activities in the Buffalo River AOC.

25 Dissolved Oxygen and Associated Parameter Sampling DatE, Buffalo River(R-16, Table 4.7).

25b Chemical Sampling Data, Buffalo River, 1982 (R-16, Table 4.8).

26 Buffalo Harbor Nutrient/Quality Indicators - Sediment Analysis (2,Table 4).

27 Contaminant Concentrations in Buffalo River Water Samples, Ohio StreetBridge, April 1982-March 1982 (R-16, Table A.1).

28a New York State Water Quality Standards and Criteria Exceedances ofBuffalo River Water Samples, Ohio Street Bridge, April 1982-March 1986(R-16, Table A.2).

28b Inventory of Samples (5, Table I).

28c Analyses Conducted on Water Samples Collected at Buffalo River, Buffalo,NY (5, Table II).

28d Analyses Conducted on Suspended Sediment Samples Collected at BuffaloRiver, B0'falo, NY. Inorganic Parameters (5, Table III).

28e Analyses Conducted on Suspended Sediment Samples Collected at Buffalo

River, Buffalo, NY. Organic Parameters (5, Table IV).

29 Groundwater Sampling at Hazardo's Waste Sites (R-16, Table B-62).

30 Mean Priority Pollutant Concentrations in Groundwater Samples at Signif-icant Hazardous Sites (R-16, Table B.2).

31 EPA Priority Pollutant and Special Category Loadings for ParametersQuantified from December 1981-82 Sampling (R-21, Table 2.4).

32 Significant Discharges of EPA Priority and Special Category Pollutantsto the Niagara River Based on Quantitative Data (R-21, Table 2.9).

33 EPA Priority Pollutants and Special Category Loadings fromSignificant Sources by Categories/Parameters from December 1981-82Sampling (Quantified Parameters only) (R-21, Table 2.14).

34 PAH Concentrations in Water from Allied Chemical Outfalls to BuffaloRiver (R-7, Table 4).

6

Title

35 PAH Concentrations in Water from Buffalo Color Water Outfalls and Intake(R-7, Table A.2).

36 Storm Sewer Sediment Analyses for Priority and Selected Category Pollut-ants (R-21, Table A.2).

37 Sediment Discharge Relationship for the Buffalo River (R-29).

38 Summary of Shoaling Rates (R-29).

39 Concentration of Selected Inorganic and Organic Compounds in DredgedMaterial Samples at Times Beach Confined Dispoal Facility. 241 (915080)(R-21).

40 Concentration of Parameters in Subsurface and Surface Water Samples atTimes Beach Confined Disposal Facility (R-21).

41 Concentrations of Parameters in Subsurface and Surface Wate5. Samples atSmall Boat Harbor Site and Buffalo Outer Harbor Site.

42 Concentrations of Parameters in Soil Samples from Mobil Oil Corporation-Site 141 (915040) (R-21).

43 Concentrations of Parameters in Four Soil Samples from McNaughton-Brooks, Inc.-Site 138 (915034) (R-21).

44 Concentrations of Parameters in Additional Soil Samples from McNaughton-

Brooks, Inc.-Site 138 (915034) (R-21).

45 Concentrations of Metals in Groundwater Samples from Allied Chemical-Site 107 (915004) R-21).

46 Concentrations of Parameters in Soil Samples from Buffalo Color

Corporation-Site 120-122 (915012-a,b,c) (R-21).

47 Significant Hazardous Waste Sites Buffalo-Lackawanna Sub-Area (R-21).

48 Sites Having Significant Potential for Contamirant Migration Along the

Niagara River (New York and Ontario) (R-21).

49 Buffalo River Fish Contaminant Data, December Sampling 1977-1984 (R-16,Table 4.4).

50 Contaminant Concentrations in Lake Erie and Niagara River FilamentousAlgae (Cladophora glomerata), 1980 (R-21, Table C.29).

51 Contaminant Concentrations in Lake Erie and Niagara River FilamentousAlgae (Cladophora glomerata), June 1981 (R-21, Table C.30).

52 Contaminant Concentrations in Lake Erie and Niagara River FilamentousAlgae (Cladophora glomerata), July 1981 (R-21, Table C.31).

53 Key to Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Nomenclature Designated by Inter-national Union of Pure and Applied Chemists (IUPAC) Numbers (R-11).

54 Concentrations of PCBs and Pesticides in the Soft Tissue of Elliptiodilatata (ug/kg wet weight) (R-11).

55 Organochlorine Contaminants Accumulated by Clams (Elliptio dilatata)Exposed to Lake Erie and Niagara River Waters in 1981.

56 Organochlorine Contaminants Accumulated by Clams (Eliptio dilatata)Exposed to Lake Erie and Niagara River Waters in 1980.

7

NO Title

57 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Data, Buffalo River, 1982 (R-16, Table 4.10).

58 Typical Exposures for Incidental Ingestion of Water While Swimming (3,Table 6.13).

59 Reasonable Worst Case Exposures for Incidental Ingestion of Water WhileSwimming (3, Table 6.14).

60 Typical Exposures for Dermal Contact with Surface Water While Swimming(', Table 6.15).

61 Reasonable Worst Case Exposures for Dermal Contact with Surface WaterWhile Swimming (3, Table 6.16).

62 Typical Exposures for Dermal Contact with Suspended Sediments WhileSwimming (3, Table 6.17).

63 Reasonable Worst Case Exposures for Dermal Contact with Suspended Sedi-ments While Swimming (3, Table 6.18).

64 Typical Exposures for Ingestion of Contaminated Fish (3, Table 6.19).

65 Reasonable Worst Case Exposures for Ingestion of Contaminated Fish (3,Table 6.20).

66 Human Health Risk Resulting from Dermal Contact with Sediments: TypicalCase (3, Table 8.1).

67 Human Health Risk Resulting from Dermal Contact with Water: TypicalCase (3, Table 8.2).

68 Human Health Risk Resulting from Incidental Ingestion of Water: TypicalCase (3, Table 8.3).

69 Human Health Risk Resulting from Ingestion of Fish: Typical Case (3,Table 8.4).

70 Total Human Health Risk Summed over all Pathways (Typical Case) (3,Table 8.5).

71 Human Health Risk Resulting from Dermal Contact with Sediments: Reason-able Worst-Case (3, Table 8.6).

72 Human Health Risk Resulting from Dermal Contact with Water: ReasonableWorst-Case (3, Table 8.7).

73 Human Health Risk Resulting from Incidental Ingestion of Water: Reason-able Worst-Case (3, Table 8.8).

74 Human Health Risk Resulting from Ingestion of Fish: Reasonable Worst-Case (3, Table 8.9).

75 Total Human Health Risk Summed over all Pathways (Reasonable Worst-Case)(3, Table 8.10).

8

LIST OF FIGURES

Title

I Contaminant migration pathways for evaluation of in-place contaminatedsediments.

2 Location of the Buffalo River AOC.

3 Boundary of the Buffalo River AOC.

4a Sediment sampling sites in the Buffalo River AOC.

4b Location of sediment sampling stations (3, Figure 5.1).

4c USACOE 1983 sediment sampling locations (1).

4d Buffalo River location map (6, Figure 6).

5 Locations of the samples taken on October 30, 1987 by NYSDEC (R-20,Figure 4.1).

6 Sediment sampling stations for USEPA V-GLNPO sub-project 1, 1981 (R-21,Figure 4.3).

7 Buffalo River and Buffalo Ship Canal EPA sampling stations (R22).

8a Sediment sampling sites for sub-project 8, 23 and 27 (R-21, Figure 4.2).

8b Sediment sampling sites in Buffalo River and harbor (2, Figure 1).

8c Sediment sampling sites in Black Rock Channel (2, Figure 2).

9 Sediment sampling sites for sub-project 3 (R-21, Figure 4.4).

10 Location of Buffalo River sediment survey study area and control sites(R-4, Figure 10).

11 Sampling sites in study area of Buffalo River sediment survey study byErie County (R-4). (Transects (735-751), cross-sectional positions (1-5), and segment numbers are also shown)

12 Area distribution of PAHs in Buffalo River sediment survey study (R-4,Figure 12). (Numbers within segments denote number of individual PAHsof high concentration. Shaded segments have eight or more individualPAHs of high concentration)

13 Location of water quality monitoring stations in the Buffalo Riverwatershed (Modified from R-16, Figure 2.6).

14 Location of water quality sampling stations and combined sewer overflowsin the Buffalo River AOC (Modified from R-16, Figure 5.5).

15 Discharges with significant loadings to the Niagara River (R21,Figure 2.1).

16 Sediment sampling sites in Buffalo River and harbor for the USACOE

sedimentation study (R-29, Figure 1).

17 Location of cross sections for sedimentation analysis (R-29, Figure 2).

18 Sites having a significant potential for contaminated migration (R-21,

Figure 3.1).

19 General Distribution of Current Land Use Along the Buffalo River (R-16,Figure 11.1).

9

No. Title

20 Location of sampling sites for fish, alga, clams, mussels biomonitoringand artificial substrates in the Buffalo River AOC.

10

CONVERSION FACTORS, NON-SI TO SI (METRIC) UNITS OF MEASUREMENT

Non-SI units of measurement used in this report can be converted to SI

(metric) units as follows:

Multiply By To Obtain

acres 4,046.873 square meters

cubic feet 0.02831685 cubic meters

cubic yards 0.7645549 cubic meters

feet 0.3048 meters

gallons (US liquid) 3.785412 cubic decimeters

miles (US statute) 1.609347 kilometers

square miles 2.589998 square kilometers

tons (2,000 pounds, mass) 907.1847 kilograms

11

INFORMATION SUMMARY, AREA OF CONCERN:

BUFFALO RIVER, NEW YORK

INTRODUCTION

Background

The Water Quality Act of 1987, Section 118, authorizes the Great Lakes

National Program Office (GLNPO) to carry out a 5-year study and demonstration

project, Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediments (ARCS), with

emphasis on the removal of toxic pollutants from bottom sediments. Informa-

tion from the ARCS program is to be used to guide the development of Remedial

Action Plans (RAPs) for 42 identified Great Lakes Areas of Concern (AOCs) as

well as Lake-wide Management Plans (Figure 2).

The AOCs are areas where serious impairment of beneficial uses of water

or biota (drinking, swimming, fishing, navigation, etc.) is known to exist, or

where environmental quality criteria are exceeded to the point that such

impairment is likely. Priority consideration was given to the following five

AOCs: Saginaw Bay, Michigan; Sheboygan Harbor, Wisconsin; Grand Calumet

River, Indiana; Ashtabula River, Ohio; and Buffalo River, New York.

Each state has established RAP coordinators to develop a RAP for each

AOC. Most RAP coordinators state that there is a need to develop guidance to

interpret the information in a manner that will allow decisions to be made

about each AOC. The following summarizes the status of the RAP reports for

the five priority AOCs:

Area of Concern Status

Saginaw Bay Final RAP - September 1988

Grand Calumet River Draft RAP - January 1988

Sheboygan Harbor Draft RAP - December 1988

Buffalo River Final RAP - November 1989

Ashtabula River Draft RAP - September 1989

Purpose

The purpose of this report is to summarize the information collected

during meetings with RAP coordinators and Corps Districts to find out what

information was available on contaminant migration at each of the five prior-

ity AOCs.

12

Information collected during visits with RAP coordinators and Corps

Districts is summarized. Sources of additional information have been refer-

enced so that these can be contacted at a later date. Documents that were

mentioned during meetings with RAP coordinators, but were not available at the

time, are referenced so that they can be obtained, if desired. Retrieval of

information by subject in a quick and easy manner was a goal of this report.

Abbreviations

Definitions of abbreviations used in this report are given below for the

convenience of the reader.

USEPA V - US Environmental Protection Agency Region V

USEPA II - US Environmental Protection Agency Region II

NYSDEC - New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

NYSDOH - New York State Department of Health

IWD/OR - Inland Waters Directorate, Ontario Region, EnvironmentCanada

MOE - Ontario Ministry of the Environment

USACOE - US Army Corps of Engineers

SUMMARY OF INFORMATION

Boundary of AOC

The location of the Buffalo River AOC is shown in Figure 2. The Buffalo

River watershed is approximately 446 square miles* (outlined with dashed

lines) and includes the Cayuga Creek, Buffalo Creek, and Cazenovia Creek. The

boundary of the Buffalo River, NY, AOC is shown in Figure 3.

Contaminants of concern

At least 15 subprojects have been conducted to monitor water, sediment,

or biota in the Buffalo River (Table 2). Data from these initial subprojects

plus more recent studies have been collected, and the contaminants of concern

have been tabulated according to water, sediment, or biota in Table 3. Con-

taminants include a mix of metals and organic compounds. The New York State

Health Department issued a 1987-1988 fish and wildlife advisory to eat no carp

from the Buffalo River due to elevated PCBs and chlordane tissue contents.

* A table of factors for converting non-SI units of measurements to SI(metric) units is presented on page 11.

13

Levels of PCBs and DDT (and metabolites) in carp are stated to pose a risk of

toxicity to piscivorous wildlife inhabiting the river. Young-of-year spottail

shiners have been collected by NYSDEC in 1985 and 1987 with levels of PCBs

exceeding NYSDEC criteria.

A summary of impairments and potential sources and causes for the Buf-

falo River AOC is shown as Table 4.

Levels of contaminants

The highest concentrations of contaminants found in Buffalo River sedi-

ments and biota are listed in Tables 5 and 6. Ranges of water quality parame-

ters are shown in Table 7.

Volume of contaminated sediments

Based on average annual peak daily flow of the Buffalo River for a 5-

year period of record (1940-1985) of 12,300 cfs, the average annual suspended

sediment yield for the drainage basin has been estimated as 94,100 tons. The

dredged volume is actually lower than the recorded inflowing suspended sedi-

ment data. The volume of sediment in the navigation channel of the Buffalo

River has been estimated to be 100,000 to 125,000 cubic yards. Information on

the volume of sediment outside the navigation channel was not found. There

are limited data to indicate the volumes of sediment contaminated with spe-

cific contaminants at specific levels of contamination.

Sedin..nt data

At least five major sediment sampling studies have bcen conducted on the

Buffalo River. The locations of the sampling sites are shown in Figures 4a,

4b, and 4c. More specific locations and sediment data for each study are

presented in Figures 5-12 and Tables 8-23g. The USACOE has taken one large

composite sediment sample in August 1989 near Buffalo Color to conduct sedi-

ment treatability tests. The results of these tests will be available within

12 months. Additional sediment samples were collected in 1989 (Laniak et al.

1990). These data are reported in Table 23h, The Toxicity/Chemistry Work

Group of the ARCS Program planned sediment sampling in the Buffalo River

during 1990 (USEPA 1990; Figure 4d).

Water quality data

Monitoring of surface water quality is the Buffalo River and tributaries

of the Buffalo River watershed is summarized in Table 24 for the locations

shown in Figures 13 and 14. Selected data are presented in Table 7 and

Tables 25a-28a. Water and suspended sediment samples were collected during

dredging (Smith, Glowacky, and Crerar 1984; Tables 28b through 28e).

14

Monitoring of groundwater has been conducted by the US Geological Survey

(USGS) at selected Hazardous Waste and Contaminated Sites (Tables 29 and 30).

Low dissolved oxygen during August has been identified as contributing to poor

water quality for biota in the Buffalo River.

Point source discharges

Point source discharges have been documented in relation to industrial

discharges and waste loadings from flow and USEPA priority and special pollut-

ant concentrations measured at industrial outfalls. The locations of major

discharges are shown in Figure 15 (Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6). Selected waste loading

data are presented in Tables 31-35.

Nonpoint source discharges

Locations of storm sewer discharges are shown in Figure 14. Selected

storm sewers have been monitored to document migration of contaminants through

surface runoff (Table 36).

Waterway hydraulics/watershed hydrology

A recent study has estimated the sedimentation and shoaling rates for

the Buffalo River (USAE District, Buffalo 1988, R29*). Sediment discharge

relationsb'ps have been developed (Table 37). Locations of sediment sampling

and cross sections for the sedimentation analysis are shown in Figures 16 and

17. A summary of shoaling rates is presented as Table 38.

Air quality

No air quality data were identified.

Potential hazardous

waste sites/Superfund sites

Potential migration of contaminants from five contaminated sites has

been identified (NYSDEC 1988, R16). The location of these sites is shown in

Figure 18 and described in Tables 39-48.

The Times Beach-Site 241 (915080) is located adjacent to Lake Erie near

the head of the Niagara River. The Corps of Engineers used this 18.6-hectare

(46-acre) site for disposal and containment of dredged material from the Buf-

falo River, Buffalo Harbor, and the Black Rock Canal from 1971-1976. Approxi-

mately 420,500 cubic meters (550,000 cubic yards) of dredged material has been

deposited at the site. In the summer of 1981, the Corps of Engineers col-

lected 16 dredged material samples from the site. The samples were analyzed

* See list of References at conclusion of text.

15

for a number of organic and inorganic constituents; the results are presented

in Table 39.

Three monitoring wells were installed by the USGS in the containment

site in 1982. In January 1983, the three monitoring wells installed at the

site were sampled, and a surface water sample was collected by the USGS. Each

sample was analyzed for priority pollutants. The results of the analyses are

presented in Table 40.

Two other dredged material containment sites, the Small Boat Harbor

containment site located in the Buffalo Outer Harbor and the Buffalo Harbor

containment site located adjacent to the Bethlehem Steel Corporation plant

along Lake Erie, were sampled in a similar manner. The results of the subsur-

face and surface water samples at these sites are presented in Table 41.

The Mobil Oil Corporation-Site 141 (915040) is located in the southern

part of the city of Buffalo adjacent to the Buffalo River at mile 4.9. The

site was used to dispose of unknown quantities of noncontact cooling water

silt, air flotation unit sediments, gravity separator sediments, tetraethyl

lead, lube sludges, spent catalysts, and soil contaminated with asphalt and

fuel oil. It is expected that there is contaminant migration to the Buffalo

River from the disposal site. The material underlying the disposal site is

sand, which has a high permeability; thus, the groundwater may move freely

toward the river. One soil sample was collected by USGS in 1982 from each of

four test borings. Each sample received lead analysis and a GC/MS acid-base

natural scan for organic compounds. The results of the analyses indicate

elevated levels of lead (920 pg/g maximum, 238 pg/g mean). No organic prior-

ity pollutants were quantified. Analyses of four additional soil samples

collected by USGS in May 1983 and analyzed for organic parameters are

presented in Table 42.

The McNaughton-Brooks, Incorporated-Site 138 (915034) is located in the

city of Buffalo near the Buffalo river at mile 4.7. Solvents such as xytol,

toluol, and paint sludges were disposed on a rubble pile at the site until

1966. The clay encountered inhibits vertical migration of contaminants. The

concentration of synthetic organic compounds in the soil samples analyzed

indicates that horizontal migration off the disposal site may have occurred.

One soil sample was collected by USGS in 1982 from each of four boreholes and

analyzed for cadmium, chromium, lead; a GC/MS acid-base neutral scan for

organic compounds was also performed. Lead was the only inorganic constituent

identified at elevated levels. The maximum and mean values for lead and the

16

organic priority pollutants quantified are presented in Table 43. Organic

parameter analyses of four additional soil samples collected by USGS in May

1983 are presented in Table 44.

Allied Chemical-Site 107 (915004) is located in the southern part of the

city of Buffalo and is adjacent to the Buffalo River at mile point 4.5. The

site had a sludge lagoon in which an unknown quantity of spent vanadium

pentoxide catalyst, sulfate sludges, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, salts, slag,

and polymerized "sulphan" were deposited. The lagoon operated between 1930

and 1977. Since then, it has been excavated and filled with clean fill. No

geologic data were obtained for this site. Three monitoring wells were

drilled by the owner between the disposal site and the Buffalo River. Nc

drilling logs were available. Three monitoring wells were sampled by the USGS

in July 1982. Each water sample was analyzed for chromium, copper, lead,

nickel, and vanadium. The results presented in Table 45 indicate elevated

levels of lead and nickel.

Buffalo Color Corporation-Sites 120-122 (915012-a.b.c) are located in

the southern part of the city of Buffalo and are adjacent to the Buffalo River

at mile point 4.1. Three disposal sites have been identified on the property:

two lagoons for iron oxide sludge which were used from 1930-1963; a weathering

area which may contain traces of organics in metal sludge; and a 774-foot well

used to dispose of 3.5 million gallons of 40 percent ammonium sulfate from

1957-1963. The geology of thie site consists of 2.1 to 6.1 meters (7 to

20 feet) of fill. The site is underlain with Onondaga Limestone. The deep

well extends to the bottom of the Lockport Dolomite or uppermost portions of

the Rochester Shale. A 61-meter (200-foot) steel casing extends from the

surface through the Camillus Shale. Two complete soil samples collected and

analyzed in December 1982 by the owner showed concentrations presented in

Table 46.

Soil samples obtained below the two closed lagoons indicated the

presence of similar compounds. A detailed site investigation program is cur-

rently under way at this facility. The preximity of these sites to the river

and the concentrations of organic and inorganic compounds indicate a signifi-

cant potential for contaminant movement to the river.

Spills

No information was available concerning spills that have occurred in the

Buffalo River.

17

Adiacent land use contaminant sources

Current adjacent land use is shown in Figure 19. Most of the property

near the Buffalo River is currently being used for industrial, manufacturing,

and transportation operations, or is vacant. Some facility activities include

flour milling, cereal and grain processing, grain transportation and distribu-

tion, cement distribution, furniture making and refinishing, metal recycling,

dye manufacturing, tire recycling, oil storage and dehydration, and sulfuric

acid production.

The watershed of the Buffalo River is roughly triangular in shape, as

the basin map (Figure 2) shows, and has a drainage area of about 446 square

miles. There are three major streams in the watershed: Cayuga Creek, Buffalo

Creek, and Cazenovia Creek.

Cayuga Creek is the northernmost of the three major streams in the Buf-

falo River Basin. It is 40 miles long and drains 128 square miles of Erie,

Genesee, and Wyoming counties. The lower reaches of Cayuga Creek pass through

the residential communities of Lancaster and Depew. The upland areas are

primarily farmland and wooded areas.

Buffalo Creek drains an area of 150 square miles and joins Cayuga Creek

8 miles above Lake Erie to form the Buffalo River. It is 43 miles long from

its source near Java Center in Wyoming County to its confluence with Cayuga

Creek. The land adjacent to Buffalo Creek is primarily farmland and woods.

Buffalo Creek passes through several small communities.

Cazenovia Creek joins the Buffalo River about 6 miles above Lake Erie.

The total watershed area is 138 square miles. Cazenovia Creek is similarly

typified by agricultural and wooded sections of land, with several small resi-

dential communities and scattered park and recreational areas.

Bioassay data

Limited bioassay data are available for the Buffalo River AOC. Acute

toxicity bioassays were conducted with Daphnia magna and Hyalella azteca

(NYSDEC 1988, R16). Chronic toxicity bioassays were conducted with Ceriodaph-

nia dubia. Laboratory variation in test results led to inconclusive test

results. Bioaccumulation bioassays were conducted with fathead minnows. None

of the contaminants bioaccumulated in test organisms were not found in the

sediment tested. These tests were inconclusive.

Biological data

The Buffalo River drainage basin provides a wide variety of fish habitat

conditions. Basin conditions range from brook trout habitat in some upper

18

,. .. .

stream reaches to, warmwater species habitat in the lower urban areas. Trout,

salmon, black bass, and northern pike are among the many species found within

the watershed. The NYSDEC stocks the Little Biiffalo Creek (on Cayuga Creek

system), the main Buffalo Creek, and the East Branch Cazenovia Creek with

trout. Como Park Lake (Cayuga Creek) is stocked with panfish. In addition,

the Buffalo Harbor is stocked with trout.

Fish, clams, mussels, and algae have been sampled or exposed to the

Buffalo River AOC. Sampling locations for these studies are shown in Fig-

ure 20, and data are presented in Tablis 49-56. Based on fish tissue concen-

tration of PCBs, DDT and chlordane, a 1987-1988 fish advisory was issued to

eat no carp from the Buffalo River AOC. Levels of PCBs and DDT (and metabo-

lites) in carp are stated to pose a risk of toxicity to piscivorous wildlife

inhabiting the river.

Benthic macroinvertebrates were sampled in 1982. Data from this sam-

pling are presented in Table 57. The populations of benthic macroinverte-

brates have been related to those typically found in organically contaminated

sediments.

Risk assessment

No risk assessments have been conducted for the Buffalo River AOC prior

to 1989. However, fish advisories were issued for PCB, DDT, and chlordane

contamination in 1987-1988. Laniak et al. (1990) prepared a baseline human

health risk assessment. Estimates of human exposure to various contaminants

are presented in Tables 58-75.

19

GLNPO SUBJECT-REFERENCE MATRIX

AREA OF CONCERN: Buffalo River, New York

Subject Reference*.** Point of Contactt

Sediment R16, R9, R3, R19, R22, R21, R4, R28 P5

Metals R16, R9, R22, R21, R4, R28 (1, 2, 3) P5

PCBs R16, R9, R22, R21, R4, R28 (1, 3) P5

PAHs R16, R9, R15, R22, R21, R4, R28 (1, 3) P5

Pesticides R16, R9, R22, R21, R4, R28 (1, 3) P5

Purgeable Halocarbons R28

TOC

Others (specify)

CN R16, R28 (1, 2)

TVS R4

O&G R28 (1, 2)

Particle Size R20, R28 (2, 4)

Engineering Properties R20

Deposition Data R16, R13, R29, R20 P9, P3

Transport Data R13, R29, R20 P8, P7

Depth Data R16, R9

Horizontal Distribution R16, R9 P5

Volume To Be Considered R23

Elutriate Test R16, R9 (4)

Water Quality R16, R19, R23, R21, R3 P6, P4, P5, P12, P10

Turbidity R16 P2

Physical Data R16, R17 P6

Temperature R16, R17 P6

DO R16, R17 P6

Conductivity R16, R17 P6

Hardness

Total Suspended Solids R16 (5)

Total Solids R16, R17, R23 (1, 2)

TVS R16

* Numbers refer to sources listed in the References section (page 24).** Numbers in parentheses refer to sources listed in Literature Cited (Appendix 1).t Points of contact are listed on page 28.

20

Subject Reference Point of Contact

Chemical Data R18, RI9, R34, R33, R31, R3, R23

pH R16. R17 (5)

TOC R23

Metals R16, R17, RI8 (5)

PCBs (5)

PAHs (5) P4

Pesticides

COD R16, R23 (1, 2)

BOD RI6, R23

Others (specify)

N R16 (1, 2)

P R16 (1, 2)

Volatile Organics R16

Bacteria

Waterway Hydraulics

Flow Data R16, R13 P7

Water Depth R5

Flood Data R5

Point Discharges R16, R21, R3

Concentration Data R16, R21, R23

Volume Data R16, R21

Waste Load Data R16, R21, R23

Storm Sewers R21

Nonpoint Discharges R16, R21

Hazardous Waste Sites

Concentration Data

Volume Data

Waste Load Data R23

Spills

Watershed Hydrology R16, R13

Rainfall Data

Acid Rain

Runoff Data R32, R21

Loads R21

Volume

21

Subject Refergnc Point of Contact

Watershed Hydrology (Cont.)

Runoff Data (Cont.)

Solids

Chemical Data (Specify) R21

Leachate R14

Air

Air Quality Data

Atmospheric Deposition

Superfund Sites R16, R21

Adjacent Land Use R30, R16, R31

Contaminant Sources R16, R15

Geology R20

Groundwater R28, R21, R8

Flow R8

Chemistry R28, R21, R8

Bioassay Data

Acute R16

Chronic R16, R9, R4, Rl

Bioaccumulation R16, RIl

Biological Data

Fish R16, RIO, R2 (3) P9

Diversity R16, RIO

Quantity R16, RIO

Quality-Tumors R2 PI

Tissue Content R16, R9

(Zooplankton) Water Column R16, R35Macroinvertebrates

Advisory R16

Tainting Flesh R16

Risk Assessment (3)

Historical Data R23 (3)

Population Data R23

Benthic R16, RlI, RIO, R25, R24, R21

Diversity R16, RIO, R25

Abundance R16, RIO, R25

Content RIl, R21

22

Subject Reference Point of ContactBirds R16, RIO

Diversity RI0

Quantity RI0

Contents

Plants RIO

Diversity RI0

Abundance RIO

Contents R28

Metals R28

Phytoplankton R16, R35Mammals R16, RI0

Endangered Species

Other

Trout Stocking R16

Algae (Cladophora) R27, R21

Content Metals R27, R21

Purgeable Halocarbons R27

Pesticides R27

PCBs R27

Base Neutral R27

Acid Fraction R27

23

REFERENCES

RI Black, J. J. 1986. Internal Report to United States Engineer DistrictBuffalo, N.Y. Carcinogenic Effects of Sediments from the Times Beach DredgeSpoils Disposal Site and Other Polluted Aquatic Sediments Collected in theVicinity of Buffalo, N.Y.

R2 Black, J. J. 1988. Fish Tumors as Known Field Effects of Contaminants.Toxic Contamination in Large Lakes, Vol, 1 Chrolic Effects of Toxic Contamina-tion in Large Lakes, Lewis Pub., Chelsea, Michigan.

R3 Data Quality Sub-Committee. 1984. Final Report to the Niagara RiverToxics Committee.

R4 Erie County Environmental Compliance Services. 1986. Draft Report Buf-falo River Sediment Study.

R5 Flood Insurance Study (FIS) City of Buffalo. National Flood InsuranceProgram, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal InsuranceAdministration.

R6 Frederick, V. R., and C. Booth. 1979. In Situ Investigation of theEffects of the Buffalo River Environment on Plankton Organisms. Great LakesLaboratory, State University College at Buffalo.

R7 Kuzia, E. S., and J. J. Black. 1985. Investigation of Polycyclic Aro-matic Hydrocarbon Discharges to Water in the Vicinity of Buffalo, N.Y. Pre-pared for the US Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes National ProgramOffice, EPA 905/4-85-002.

R8 LaSala, A. M., Jr. Groundwater Resources of the Erie-Niagara Basin,N.Y. 1968. Report of the Niagara River Toxics Committee, October 1984.

R9 Litten, S. 1987. Niagara River Area Sediments Results of the NiagaraRiver Implementation Plan Sediment Study and the Buffalo River Sediment Study.New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 108 pgs.

R1O Makarewicz, J. C., R. C. Dilcher, J. M. Haynes, and K. Shump. 1982.Biological Survey Buffalo River and Outer Harbor of Buffalo, N.Y,. Vols 1 and2. Biology Department, State University College at Brockport.

Rll Marquenie, J., et al. Distribution of PCB and Pesticide Contaminants inthe Vicinity of the Times Beach Confined Disposal Facility, Buffalo. Miscel-laneous Paper (in preparation). US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Sta-tion, Vicksburg, MS.

R12 Marquenie, J., et al., 1987. Preliminary Assessment of Bioaccumulationof Metals and Organic Contaminants at the Times Beach Confined Disposal Site,Buffalo, New York. Miscellaneous Paper EL-87-6. US Army Engineer WaterwaysExperiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.

R13 Meredith, D., and R. Rumer. 1987. Sediment Dynamics in the BuffaloRiver. A Report to the New York State Department of Environmental Conserva-tion. Department of Civil Engineering, State University of New York atBuffalo.

R14 Myers, T. E. 1987 (10 Aug). "Estimation of Leachate from Buffalo Har-bor Dike 1 Confined Disposal Facility, Buffalo, N.Y.," Memorandum for Record,US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.

24

R15 Nelson, C. R., and R. A. Hites. 1980. Aromatic Amines in and Near theBuffalo River. Environmental Science and Technology, 14:1147-1149.

R16 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 1988. BuffaloRiver Remedial Action Plan (Draft) Buffalo, NY.

R17 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division ofWater. Report of the Fixed Station Conventional Parameter Water Quality Sur-veillance Network, Volumes 1982-1986.

R18 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division ofWater. Report of the Fixed Station Toxic Parameter Water Quality SurveillanceNetwork. Volumes 1982-1986.

R19 Pethybridge, A. H. 1981. Analysis of Sediment, Water and ElutriateWater Collected and Processed from Buffalo Harbor, New York Sampling Sitesprepared for Buffalo District, US Army Corps of Engineers, Great Lakes Labora-tory, State University College at Buffalo.

R20 Raggio, G., G. Jirka, and S. Pacenka. 1988. Modeling and Field Studiesof Sediment Transport in the Buffalo River. Prepared for the New York StateDepartment of Environmental Conservation, Center for Environmental Research,Cornell University.

R21 Report of the Niagara River Toxics Committee. 1984 (October).

R22 Rockwell, D. C., R. E. Claff, and D. W. Kuehl. 1983. 1981 Buffalo, NewYork, Area Sediment Survey (BASS). US Environmental Protection Agency, GreatLakes National Program Office. EPA 905/3-84-001.

R23 Sauer, D. E. 1979. An Environmental History of the Buffalo River.

R24 Simpson, K. W. 1980. Macroinvertebrate Survey of the Buffalo RiverSystem-1976, New York State Department of Health, Environmental Health ReportNo. 8.

R25 Sweeney, R. A., and C. Merckel. 1972. Survey of Benthic Macroinverte-brates and Analysis of Water and Sediments from the Buffalo River, 1972.Great Lakes Laboratory, State University College Buffalo, Special ReportNo. 14.

R26 Stafford, E., et al. 1990. Collation and Interpretation of Data forTimes Beach Confined Disposal Facility, Buffalo, New York: Interim Report,Miscellaneous Paper (in preparation), US Army Engineer Waterways ExperimentStation, Vicksburg, MS.

R27 T. P. Associates International, Inc. 1987. Algae Analysis BuffaloHarbor Dike 1. Dike 4. Times Beach.

R28 T. P. Associates International, Inc. 1987. Nine Monitoring Wells, OneSurface Location Times Beach, 5 Wells - Small Boat Harbor, 2 Surface WaterConfined Disposal Facilities.

R29 US Army Engineer District, Buffalo. 1988. Buffalo River SedimentationStudy.

R30 US Army Engineer District, Buffalo. 1984. Project Maps of BuffaloDistrict, River and Harbor Flood Control, Erosion Control.

R31 US Department of the Interior, Geological Survey (USGS). HydrologicUnit 04120103, Erie County, N.Y., USGS 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Maps:Buffalo NE, Buffalo SE, Clarence, East Aurora, Lancaster and Orchard Park.

25

R32 US Environmental Protection Agency, Water Planning Division. 1983.

Results of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program, Vol. 1.

R33 US Geological Survey Toxic Substances Hydrology Program (TSHP).

R34 US Geological Survey Water-Data Reports; Data on Streamflow, GroundwaterLevels, Water Quality for Each State by Year.

R35 Ward, C. A. 1980. A Survey of the Crustacean Zooplankton in the Buf-falo River. 1979. Great Lakes Laboratory, State University College atBuffalo.

R36 Webb, R. G., and McCall, A. C. 1973. Quantitative PCB Standards forElectron Capture Gas Chromatography. Journal of Chromatographic Science,11: 366-373.

26

ADDITIONAL REFERENCES

Ecology and Environment, Inc. 1982. Buffalo River Water Quality Evalua-tion, Prepared for the Buffalo River Improvement Corporation.

Frederick, V. R. 1978. Preliminary Investigation of the Effects of Dis-solved Substances from Resuspended Buffalo River Sediment on Selected Fauna,Great Lakes Laboratory, State University College at Buffalo. Unpublished.

Kay, S. H., J. W. Simmers, and J. M. Marquenie. 1986. PolychlorinatedBiphenyls in Fishes from the Times Beach Confined Disposal Site, Buffalo, N.Y.Proc. Int. Conf. Environmental Contamination, CEP Consultants, Edinburgh.

Litten, S. 1982. Chemical Identification in Survey Samples and Contami-nated Site Follow-Up: Toxic Substance Control Act Cooperative Agreement ReportNo. 6. Bureau of Monitoring and Assessment, Division of Water, New York StateDepartment of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.

McMahon, J. C. 1987. Comparison of 1981-82 and 1985-86 Toxic SubstanceDischarges to the Niagara River, New York State Department of EnvironmentalConservation.

Newell, A. J., D. W. Johnson, and L. K. Allen. 1987. Niagara River BiotaContamination Project: Fish Flesh Criteria for Piscivorous Wildlife, NewYork State Department of Environmental Conservation.

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Region 9. 1988.1986-87 Toxic Substance Discharges to the Niagara River. New York StateDepartment of Environmental Conservation.

Oleszko, R. W. 1976, A Limnological Study of the Buffalo River-1975.Great Lakes Laboratory, State University College at Buffalo.

27

POINTS OF CONTACT

Person Area of Expertise Location/Telephone

1. John Black Fish Tumors N.Y. Dept. of Health, RoswellPark Memorial Institute,Buffalo, NY716-845-3350

2. G. Jirka Natural Capping N.Y. State Water Resource Inst.468 Hollister Hall

Cornell Univ.,Ithaca, NY607-255-7535

3. Edward Kuzia Water Quality, N.Y. State Dept. ofPAHs Environmental Conservation,

Albany, NY

4. Dick Leonard Water Quality US Army Engineer District,Buffalo; 1776 Niagara St.,Buffalo, NY 14207

716-879-4270

5. Simon Litten Water Quality, N.Y. State Dept. ofSediment Dating Environmental Conservation

Bureau of TechnicalServices and Research;50 Wolf Rd.,

Albany, NY

518-457-7470

6. John McMahon RAP Coordinator N.Y. Dept. of EnvironmentalConservation; 600 Delaware,Buffalo, NY716-847-4600

7. David Melfi Sediment US Army Engineer District,Transport Buffalo, 1776 Niagara St.,

Buffalo, NY 14207

716-879-4270

8. Ralph Rumer Sediment Dept. of Civil Engineering,Transport State Univ. of New York at

Buffalo

9. US Fish & Conducting FishWildlife Studies in 1988-Service 1989

10. Tom Wilkins Modeling Cornell University-GeotechnicalIthaca, NY

28

Person Area of Expertise Location/Telephone

11. Steve Yaksich Water Quality US Army Engineer District,Buffalo, 1776 Niagara St.,Buffalo, NY 14207716-879-4272

12. USGS Gen. Info. - Hydrologic Information UnitWater Resources 419 National Center, Reston, VAof an Area

13. District Chief, Local Info. - PO Box 1669, Albany, NY 12201WRD, USGS Water 518-472-3107

Resources ofthe Area

14. USEPA STORET Office of Administration andResources Management, NationalData Processing Division,Research Triangle Park, NC27711

29

Table 1

Information Required to Evaluate the Potential for Contaminant Mobility

1. SEDIMENT DATAWater Content OGHydrous Oxides (Manganese, ferrous) ECTotal PAHs RedoxTotal PCBs (Aroclors and Congeners) SulfidesTOC SODTotal Solids Volatile SolidsOM SalinityEP Test NH3CEC (plus calcium, magnesium phosphorus,

potassium concentration in extractant)Atterberg LimitsSpecific Gravity DeterminationDispersion CoefficientsSediment Particle DensityBulk DensityPermeabilityParticle Size Distribution (hydrometer method); (include sand, fine

sand, silt and clay)Wet Sediment pH (1:2 sediment to distilled water solution)Dry Sediment pH (1:2 sediment to distilled water solution)% Base Saturation% Free Calcium CarbonatePotential pH or Lime Requirement (using titration or similar method)Total Carbon ContentTotal Soluble Heavy Metal ContentTotal Heavy Metal ContentSurface Runoff Suspended SolidsWet Sediment Extractable Heavy Metal Content (DTPA preferred)Dry Sediment Extractable Heavy Metal Content (DTPA preferred)Depth (thickness) of Mixed Top Sediment LayerDepth (thickness) of Contaminated Sediment LayersSedimentation Rate (possibly through core dating)Sediment Deposition HistorySuspended Solids Settling Rates (possibly through sediment traps)Consolidation CharacteristicsSediment Porosity (mixed layer and deeper layers)PesticidesPriority Pollutants (40 CFR Part 136)DioxinReference Site

2. POINT DISCHARGES INTO WATERWAYContaminant Loads Based on Concentration and VolumetricFlow Rates

Surface Runoff During Storm EventsCombined Sewer Overflow

(Continued)

Table 1 (Continued)

3. NONPOINT DISCHARGES INTO WATERWAYGround Water: Information on Geohydrology and Ground WaterCharacteristicsAtmospheric Deposition

4. LAND USE OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES

5. CONTAMINATED SITESHazardous WasteSuperfundSpill

6. WATERSHED HYDROLOGYWetlands

7. WATERWAY HYDRAULICS & FLOWHydrology or Flows Through the SystemArea of Bottom ContaminationWater Depth au Area of ContaminationContaminant Waste Loads to SystemFloods

8. WATER QUALITY DATADOC TOCDO HardnessBOD PHMetals ConductivityPAHs TemperaturePCBs Total SolidsTotal Suspended Solids (distributed in time and space)Best Estimates of Partition Coefficients for Low (water column) and

High (bottom sediments) Sediment ConcentrationsSediment-Water Contaminant Distribution CoefficientsBacteriological QualityPriority PollutantsInterstitial Water Contaminant Concentration

9. BIOASSAY TEST DATARapid:

microtoxDaphniaCerlodaphniaPontoporeiaAmes Test

Chronic:C. tentansDaphniafathead minnowsmacroinvertebrate

(Continued)

Table 1 (Concluded)

Plant bioassay data:Total PCB Content (aroclor content)Specific PCB CongenersPAHsHeavy Metal Uptake

10. BIOLOGICAL DATAFisheries Surveys, including:body weight/sizediet/stomach contentsfeeding typelipid contentphytoplanktonzooplankton

Benthic Communityoverall benthic "health"benthic indicators/low diversity

11. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONClimatological DataAir Quality

12. RISK ASSESSMENTHuman HealthEcological

13. WILDLIFE USAGEBirdsMammals

14. ENDANGERED SPECIESFederalState

oMISS

- D. 34

-.2 :i

-* :,o - - a

> E-4. 3 0!

" ..... .... ..... .4-o

.

.. ...

..

*rI-

t,, a) u w tv ed o m

r 4 0: A

... . .

'

.I

0

co

0 A

p+li 4 j 4 a r

I'I

0.

-a 6

4 2%0 -4,,

.. .. .,,

0 0. , cL

O0 C

0 a- a C4.) . e r.i..I:i,.ii.. P I . 4A i,. i

4.),,I.-I-

ai...... !

C

- - - *s"' -. @4D

-"

0

... I- gg... .

.Wl

*..Ja 6 66

r44

4) * 4 4

0-1 4

14 &! N H -

U4 Ci r4. c J

4)44

00 00 0 0A .,.14 14 H4 4 - 4)o . . . 41) H- Ho U.0. UUH r4

344.4

H 0

r4 4)0 H H

r.'~ a) 1~ 0) 4) :.4 0 ,4) > 4JU a .U -A4H4 4-4 W4W4 r4 H44.4 H44 .4 p.

) 4. 04 0) -t4 0 61 H) E00E4)0 0d4)~ 0 o4)~ r.c., w 0 4.4 0 0 44 W 00 44$4W 0044JP4 0 0 t-4 -4 ~44 4t-4~ 44J H :3t4 '

4)0 w12 HOd rqC C ? 4 d :3-4 CW 0H4 444.44 P 44 O 4444 >~- 44r 4 040~ ;% 94) 0 : ~00 : 9 ~00~ :

r. U I- r.c

.,4 f- - to r44 ~U 4) -r W41 bN 41) 0, r4 44>,4 0- s00 0 Sr4 3, .4U z co 4) uS r40j H 4) :3 -. uV o 4)br- H; CNQN M ~ (12 cd 0 r0 r-4 -H -0$ -- cd A 0 p 0 'Ur0 u 0=Q10 044~ W -4 M 4) -. M 0

*,. 4- o 4J.0p r-4> 4) 0u IL) 4)

4) ~ - Hp~U.'04

4) 13 -~-j U'd bD )c:

H enU --4) r.04: 4) 0 ?- p.H to 'U4 04 4 .0

4) 0. 41 4 r-4r-44wS 41 00p.u4-) 03 04) W 0 0

41AjAj 41

I 4 ~ 4 4.j In 4 4

w4 to05 w 4 w542W0 U) @ 0 to 161v0 C4 ) to W 41 @0

M V 4 V > 1 :% > ~ 41 0 001 0 W5 0 0 IA 0 0 W 0 0 00 140 0

.0 V A 0 li AV.0 U0 .0 V V.14 $4 a w 94k 0 14 w.

A1 1.4 la t.4 mc4 'A 204 IN 9:

o ) 0 0 0 t 0.4 0 9d 0 '- 4

4)0 4) 1 u044

@3 .u 0U

01 0i 0j 0 j 0 .

41 10 V

04 0 41to gu to @3 to

u 4 0~5 .

m W 4 U) 10 44 0

0d 3 0V 0, 410$ # AV 0,0C r U~ W0 (54 -1 F-4 0. m 0.% 4)-

4 1 V U-Ied 0 U.0.0 ed o- 1

> 0000Ar:4 0 $

4) ca4 ,.4 P4 r4 A 4r4 0 06- = 0 0 U)

OJO Aa Mi 04 m* P4 asA OAI ~ -4 14 0

E-f 0

5W4

00

0 -4..4 0-4 ) 0.

00 41 @354 00540.V 13 4 (d M 0

0 c . 444V V .V. 00 05 to V0

0 00u P40 44. 0A c H0 4.4 0@044 ~ 00 @3 0 0

O 04 44 -4 00 t0 -40 Q4141V 0*'-4 044 00 540 0)c0 0 00U

a) 41 V 0A ) 4)0 j 411E. S 00 Vq (*-4S4-4 U4

54 1 4 0 C6 ' i -4

0. 4.r..w 3t4 rd4#-4 4. 54) -V 4>

E-4 00 N 3w "I m.5 03 004 l

(4&

6z

0 00

0 M 000 0.9.4 0, ~ 6

S.0. a00 2

41 4'A . i Po0 0 0 0 0 0 Vz4 2 z 22 U)

60

rl -4 r4 M 4 r -4 P4 4 9441. A0 A0A 0 .0 M00 U II Eu Eu E

.4 0 H 0 , 00 20 r-4 P4 .P4 r-4 m.4 .4 .I! 000. Sk 004

to ~ ~ .M 41aC ta

r. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ .4

4) 41 41 41 a 41ta F4 M q r4 1. 9-441.0 A .0 A00. .0

W t (d 0 0 4d03 u 0 0 u u

fa .. r .4 -4 .1 .9.4 c0

mZ0 0. (0.0>. 001, 04r

m go 2 m2 m0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 C F.4

4 41

6001

CU 0

0Z 0 0.6 004.4

-4

41

60

0.60

A4 W0 14 X 0 41 0Im 40 0 r ~ .14 4.4 M0600 *4 Ai ( 041 -.4

0 0 A * E

*1.4 - .014 -0 -46,a r - 4 44 0., 44 0. *.. A9EU 1.4 o ) DO 0 41 0 A0(

0 0104 c 4 c~ EU 0 c r 14A41 e A4 0 .440 to 061 0 m 0 -4

6 0 600 .4 60 -.4 0 4 .40 P 0 400 0 i 0.. k 4 1 o m 44 E.60 LH .,4 pa a0 V0. 0 rd

-4. 0. 0M 0 k 0 0 4to . 00 c t606 AiU -40 0 w~ 44 .4. 41--

V V 41441. V 4 to 060 4.OM.W6AV 14 8 r. ce00 41 0 go 41.0.

Table 5

Highest Concentration (ug/g) of Contaminants

in Buffalo River AOC Sediments

Chemical Highest Concentration (ug/vg) Sub-Proiect No.

Lead 3300 1Zinc 600 1Mercury 66.6 8Cadmium 4.5 1p,p' -DDT 1.84 1p,p' -DDE 0.125 1Benzo (a)pyrone 72.5 1Fluoranthene 35.6 1Phenanthrene 9.6 3Anthracene 3.4 3Pyrene 22.0 3Benzofluorene 9.2 3Benzathracene 2.6 3Chrysene 1.8 3Benzo Cc) pyrene 4.5 3Perylene 13.7 3Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 5.5 3Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 1.2 3Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene 6.3 3Benzo(ghi)Perylene 2.6 3Indeno(123-cd)Pyrene 2.8 31-eptachior epoxide 0.300 1alpha- Endosulfan 0.015 1alpha- BHC 0.016 23gamma- BHC 0.298 1Endrin 0.267 11,2-DCB 247.8 11,3-DCB 10 11,4-DCB 3 111GB 58.7 1PCBs 3.2 1

Table 6

Highest Concentrations of Contaminants in Biota of Buffalo River AQO

Highest Concentration

Chemicai Ug/g. Fresh Weight

Fish (R16)

PCBs 14.5DDT 1.63Chlordane 0.53Mercury 0.29Aldrin/Dieldrin 0.06Endrin <0.01Lindane 0.04Mirex 0.01

Clams (R21)

PCBs 1284 ± 277alpha-BHC 5 ±4beta-BHC 3± 5Chlordane 13 ±7p ,p -DDD 7± 7DDT 5±10Heptachlor epoxide 3±3Herachlorobenzene 2± 1

Mussels (Rll)

HCB 1.6p,p-DDE 4.2PCB-15 8.5PCB-28 3.9PCB-44 9.0PCB-49 5.4PCB-52 5.1PCB-70 9.1PCB-87 2.6PCB- 101 5.2PCB-138 9.4PCB-153 9.6PCB- 180 53.0

Alga (R21)

PCBs 220 ± 110As 11.3 ± 0.6Cd 0.5 ± 0.1Pb 60.0 ± 1.0Hg 0.13 ± 0.01Zn 99 ±1.2

Table 7

Ranges of Water Quality Parameters Measured

in the Buffalo River AO

Parameter Range

River Water MR16)

Temp (Celsius) 6.0-24.0Per ent Saturation ()31-105DO (mg/l) 2.8-9.5Sp. Conductance (pmhos/cm) 225-445Chlorine demand (mg/i) 0.35-3.02Total Fe (mg/i) 0.417-1.06COD (mg/l) 8.8-34.6BOD (mg/l) <20TSS (mg/l) 6-38TDS (mg/i) 175-377TS (mg/i) 195-412NH3-N (mg/i) <0.06Total Chlorides (mg/i) 19.1-44.8

Groundwater. ug/l M16)

Cd 10.2Cr 223Cu 85-472Pb 174-1331Hg 0.3Ni 219Zn 261,0002- chiorophenol 13bis (2-ethylhexyl) -phthalate 371, 2-dichlorobenzene 76.7Napthalene 33.31,2,4- trichlorobenzene 25.7Benzene 141Chlorobenzene 1743

Table 8

Attenberg Limits for the Analyzed Samples from October 30,

1987 (R-20, Table 5.3)

Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity# of Value Standard # of Value Index

Tests Deviation TestsSample [%] [%] [%] [%]

A 2 47.9 1 27.3 20.6B 5 44.7 0.8 2 27.9 16.8E 4 61.3 0.7 1 36.5 24.8G 4 63.9 0.7 1 38.0 25.9K 3 34.3 1 22.2 12.11 4 44.2 0.4 1 31.1 13.1N 4 54.0 1.2 1 37.2 16.8

Nbis 5 66.1 1.3 2 38.3 27.8

Table 9

Water Contents Tests (R-20. Table 5.4)

Sample w w Moisture@ GT..CEE @ CU-SCL (air dry)

A 0.49 0.72B 0.85 0.79 41E 1.31 1.36 51G 1.55 1.36 56J 0.99 48N 0.88 47K 0.47

Table 10

Cation Exchange Capacity and Organic Matter Content of Analyzed

SampIes of October 30, 1987 (R-20 Table 5.5)

Sample Cation Exchange Capacity Organic Matte[meq/1OOg] [%]

B 1.52 3.3E 1.92 4.70 2.02 5.13 1.47 4.4N 1.34 7.8

Table 11Summary of Laboratory Test Results and Derived Quantities

(R-20. Table 5.6)

Sample w e c CEC Org LL PL PI LI1%] [kg/] [meq/l0og1 [%] [M] [%] [%3 [%]

A 0.5 1.3 1.2 48 27 21 1B 0.9 2.3 0.8 2 3 45 28 17 3E 1.3 3.5 0.6 2 5 61 37 25 4G 1.6 4.1 0.5 2 5 64 38 26 5J 1.0 2.6 0.7 1 4 44 31 13 5K 0.5 1.2 1.2 34 22 12 2.N 0.9 2.3 0.8 1 8 54 37 17 3

Nbis 66 38 28 2

Table 12

Grain Size Fractions for Samples from October 30. 1987

and Aunst 12. 1981 (R-20, Table 5.7)

Clay Silt Sand D50 Textural

Sample [% 1%] 1%] [mmi Class

A 16.5 50.3 33.2 1.5 Silt loamB 20.2 63.8 16 0.012 Silt loamE 29.4 62.8 7.8 0.008 Silty clay loamG 30.6 63.6 5.8 0.011 Silty clay loam

1 5.5 44.1 50.4 0.062 Sandy loam2 11.9 52.8 35.2 0.027 Loam3 8.0 73.7 18.3 0.022 Silt loam4 6.0 55.1 38.9 0.041 Silt loam5 7.7 70.6 21.7 0.022 Silt loam6 9.8 60.2 30.0 0.025 Silt loam7 9.8 71.3 18.6 0.016 Silt loam8 12.8 42.7 44.5 0.013 Silt loam9 10.9 72.5 16.6 0.015 Silt loam10 14.2 72.8 12.9 0.013 Silt loam11 14.5 76.7 8.8 0.010 Silt loam

Table 13

Hiswrical Bulk Sediment Contaminant Concentations-Buffalo

River and Duffalo ShID -Cana (R-22. Table 10)

HISTORICAL BULK SEDIMENT CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONSBUFFALO RIVER AND BUFFALO SHIP CANAL

Data from Rockwell, Claff, and Kuehl, 1983(mg/kg)

Sample Sites (see Fig. 9)

Substances 4 8 12 26 52 53 54

Cd 0.3 0.3 2.8 4.5 4.0 1.1 0.5Cr 14 15 1000 54 95 37 34Cu 24 33 1200 140 120 61 76Pb 89 41 3300 300 190 85 100Hg 0.1 0.1 24 1.3 3.4 0.6 1.4Ni 19 24 120 39 39 37 23Zn 100 110 540 390 470 200 260Ag 0.3 ND ND 3.5 ND ND NDTotal 2CB ND ND 180 ND ND ND NDTotal 3CB ND ND 243 ND ND ND NDTotal 4CB ND ND 1000 20 ND ND ND5CB ND ND 540 ND ND ND ND6CB ND ND 114 ND ND ND NDTotal PAH 16.5 4.2 238 285 51 1.9 16.6PCB ND 0.07 3.17 2.12 0.33 0.10 0.14Total DDT 0.049 0.007 2.318 0.205 0.209 0.099 0.169Total Chlordane .021 0.013 0.301 0.012 0.052 0.012 0.018Mirex* 0.004 ND 0.266 ND 0.01 0.004 0.007

not confirmed by GC/MS.

44I

0

coo 0000000 000000000000000000O0000000 010cc

0l C000 cc c0c C0000 ac0coo00000000000a00000 cc

r4

0: .-4 w.

41 00 (de oo o o o oo o o o oo o o o o

*.-4 0

-4 4

Iu -

-A 41M 09 0 0 0 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 !991 91 i9 999 99

0 0

0n .,- 0 0

0 .,-4 .IV000 -1 00 N 0 0 00 >1 00 0 r. V ~ ~C N 0 0~ NI

0 4 i.144 A- w 000 0>00 00 00 0 0 00-0 ~0000 E r.C flId) 0 .u? 0 vOOOOOOO 4O amc a 44 UOOOOM OONove40.400

0 0 U000000N0 0 0 41 ON m a0 A0HN0 .0040C00000

I a 8 i>1>04

N2 0tACm0

m Mr4 m 141wwMP MP4 0AAU% $.4 1 0 0 4WWI 4>- 4 4-

0i AAA1 0.00 0 VOITMa

CA

0001M00000M0000000Wf1N000000000@ooooooooooa000

Ca a0000000000000000000 1mf000000000000000 41oaooo99 9 9 99 ... .................................. 0 0 000

W e0000000000i-0000000000000400000MM0000000000000

a 0000000000000000000000000000000000*0000000000000 oooooNOCOoOooOOCOOOOOooOooooocoooooaoooooo0000

HI 000000000000000000000000000000080000000000000000

04:I 0000000000000000000000000000"r400000000000000000o

CA 1, o 0 0 0 O 0~ 0 0 0~0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o

0.1

02 va." 0N04c o

v a 9 00 to 00 r. .: r. r* *. r. IVq 0o* 0OsZI4 00 000000000000.14000-4 vV $ 4 00090"40 0 9000C00 04

l . CO > V rq 00 . 0 -19tj" t 2.4 &0 r4W.8Pwof.4..4

0I4 a I. 4f00000 t r r ol $woo 0 "Oh3Iw Cc CCCa r 01u 1 0 0O -WWWJOW W W W W WWW$4W1D44W

r- Ia4p 0 .4 4 414 u 04 0 0>0001 ol go .02.8 ka MW.4.4- 0 10. .DIM

ZW aIM.. o - 4CCc 1-4c1 M0000P . . 44 4r 4oOICC 00,0 00 V V.0 W 10V 0>1 k 30 C l~w4>q>-w1fal 0I..Cu441ovo~f4 v" ww I1 00 16.0 4, 0 10 00 0 .C.C 9NMON 0 00.w

1% 1 q 00 0U a0 0 00 en 0 0 pq0 V4 w0 4r4 -I 4 0V MI C'41. -r -r #- f-.0W U.- w >$$0 0 # l . - $4 $ $4 " >0 .4 t V 0 0 $4.0.0 0 0 4 r 49cV.

>1 014 0141 C.C 14o 4 .

.. 4 1 41 00>1iV 0-41-4. .0.0", 41410 G' u0A00Weas41s>9410% W'wiw41 4 0 0 1WV00 0 4I CL 00 . I I I0 0.. ..

'.0

ra2 0I ooae0oeoeaecaeeeo0oaeaeoaonoaaacoocoaeootneo obi 00000000e000o00000o00000000000000000000e 00000c

99) 9 99999999 !1I 9 999999 99

Hi~ CCO~COOoOOCoOo~ccccooo

000000000000000000o0000o00000000000000000o00o00mill'aaeoao oaoeaao ooaooaooo o

04 * 999999999999! * *991999999i9

c oocooccoocccocoocoococoeooooooaaoeccoao0000oo

0 HI

00

P-44

44 ~,ioooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCOCOCOCMOOOOOOO~ooo800000000eoomooooeoooooooooaaoooCOeOOOCooCOoOOOOO

040

V. 0 $4 c 4 r

WOW a)f-Ve4-x 41 0) .0r4A 000"

A s1 V. 0~ 4D.0 -4.40l 0 P 400 A . . .I 4 0 a0d 0 0.4. 4404 >oC II X )O r 4) 04.0- A

-.V.4. 41 04 0.40 .0 .4 9 0 P40 rM~4 - 4r04 04 04 c: 0 4q. u. 0 .0 A >14 4 . j 0o .I

00 A 4) d 2 .C~ 0 0. 4 0 + 0 r. 0 .4 O 0 .- cM 0 .4 04 0 r-4 MOC4 Q*r 0 Hr- 0 I ) V l 0 I0.4 111 41(a 4.10 004 430 01 .v4 C14-4 r 0- C0 000 r.~ C4 m .30* 0 4 ) W-a400

4.1 .0 0 -. CA r 0 0 I2.to a. 04 H a C,4iv 1 0 0 0 .0 0 0 c pq P4.0 4.1 4 0 00.0 0 .r0.-4k 4 0, 0-0 '. Q 0 'WO 0,11.0.,4OJ1 J

40 0 r4r f 40I 4 Do0 000.d r, --- 1 a.14000-400.

~.1 414 I O6 r4 44.0*.4j 4j 4j 0 (4 '.. r.4O0~.~>0>0 04r000 P >14140 14 0 0 Vf -V4A--. 0140UE2

a-oorp O4O4JJ44J14VV 1414r4 VV VA 0 4.0 1 W00-40 0V 0.0 0i 0 00NN -11I.13404-14- -1 1 4A4A0'.4OO000O4 H HNNN 4U

11111 . . .- 1 I 1 1 1 0 0 0000011--- .N NNCN' C..q6 dO0000000..... 00

OiNcoocoooocoocaooaao oaoccaaoanoaaaocaaaoocooa oaccaoaeoo00ae'ieooococoo oocoea oc 000

mU r N 1 M4 P.4

000 a eooeoocoaaoocoooO0oaaaoooooooaoeooooo

a oeooacaeaooaececooaeoaoaocoaocoao0000000coo

ccoc'0co000o00o00000corcocoooracooocococcccc

I a ooacooaoaooocooroocooooacooooeeccmoocaooo

100000000000000f0000000000000Moooo

.'.4

0 ooOOO0OO~aOOOOOOCOOOO00ooo0caeoa00ococcooceooc

04HO 99999999999i999999999999999990!00.C99 )

W:

H-000000OOal00OeaO~v000r'cec

E I 999 e99 09 o99949o0000999a99999aE.9a 9a 9a 99...4e999999

z1

00 044444rrrP .4 P4

r 0 w.

0 ) 0 v 44 r0 01 0 c cV 1 a O v > .4 ~01 -rq r.

.0 0 0 . V 00 ' I>1 4 4) 100dW. U 00 0 & 04. of0. P4 0 a--C A4 -'4000

04 400 4). 00 F4 1 6W- 0 0 0 00 V 0600Vso1e4j.4 V4 -4 ~0 0 40 000 .N00. 000 O ,- C 00 Na 4 N144 r.-0 C0 w V to " lr4 r-1 Ill0. to 0 61A 0 1 C 004 A 00404j M-0 dI . C00..04 . r t4J U-4 1 1 4.0 A 0 0. 0 2 444a

14 c-0 0 42440Oi44 00 v081iSom0 Ago00000k41., C r. 00 o

HAr1 I 00 0441 14 04 .0 0 O0C m m000.0 a >0 0 >4.-I 0 48 'aa P.P.> > V VVVOO14-400..0.c400444AV4.-4 P-0 P4goI 0 OF-m. >0>0 00 a c-.404 -1..0a m 0 0 44. 0A Aj -400.0 0.

nAI0 ~.4AA 0O,4r4.4..O.14 ww~u0uo 0 a4400 J J 4 4J e U0 00>0 0 0 U0 0 A t> .1 4 ~,4.0JJai v1 414 We

w N . 40 0 VM0 0 W A t. 404 OS 4I J .0 0) 000 W141414£40U 00011 1 S I I. XXX 0 0O401.0j f4CC0 4 0 Ca0 " 44j.'4 1I U'000044.0.0.0.0.0.4. 0 4j 4.'4.'41454ON

44

1 00 oo OM~OOOE'MOON 00 OOmOONOO OOqvm..4COOfC'o4@aOO 000~ a oo0eOCO0o.OP4o0OOCOCNOOOOOOEMw-4OCOOC@COO0ooC )

N

94

a oocccoaC000e0aC0oOC0oocoocaaocoooo~ OOt', oacoaooaaeoooaaocaaoacaaoooooaoaoccooco

in

Nto

0 ae 0 0o V 00 00O V 0 0 0,OO 0 0 M V 00 00 0 OOO - 0 O W %D P4WO0 0SI e00 o0 0r4 0 0 MOO00orO 0 : OO40 00 00n tOOOOOOOCOOOOHO 0

a aceccooaoceOaacoeOoacOCC0OeeCOOOOOecoo

a) * 00'-4

*1000 0000000OO lOCOCrOOC'NOHOOOCC~OOC..000,-4000 CHI 000000000000000000.-~O~-00000001f00000000-0000o

N 0

-4 I s)

1-4 4

r44

&V 0,4

10 r

-- '4 u x0~4 v :1 -04 144 Ud

0 00a. p: 0r P4,11 4NJU~ -ri rN H H to44 w0 s

UN N .L0 13 r- rqCA U 00. . a W~ -4H

,% *0 4,4.-.0 U 0 00 0.0 4 4 ~44 40 U 00 -o40q* M W .4 .4 44 C W 441 044L U C .% v4-NN01O43QQ C 0 041 U',

r4 II E ~ . e-4Q 40 r4 Q U.4NC V'IV WQQ% Q 210 )4. V rI 3w 2r :3 nIIO O 14 000 -. =0N N N N N N 81 0 00CR1 04 d1 I(40 10.0 4 f 0V1 ,4 W 1.4 (41 k...41 4 4.4 4 4 v I m rd 0 M 4L~4J A IdV AU $14 V 0 -4- k.0 - 4 0 - .040111 1g.a. .ga-- ( 10 4 0 .o" I IU.Jr. P400~0 ~ 0 P4- X 00 0 We J.4-

all A f4 41 0 U. pa- 0 0 .0 4 1.0a 00 of Nd.4 e40

44I

OM M N O 4 84O14 .444 0

04.Al 000v v0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000% 0 0 w P

94 aOOM IW N O40000000-4 NMnfw.

0 0" N 4 pol P4

'-4 -

~4 0 U%.43inO 3% P4 "N

ts 0 v4%iN (4

N 0400 r nrii ni in 0n Otv4 O%00 MwO in .' N in n ninititu

1 HV4H 4 4 r4 4 4 4 4 r 04 4 4" P4v4 "fr "IeP44P4r H

.1iEl 9i 01a,4 4 W tq C 34ON oO00m0 0-4 H-0- 0H 4) 1f v o wto. H .r.-4a- -

w3 to2f 0 0M w 4) to to 00000 M OO . - to It 0M 0% MOM 40 30.I JU(J44EEEr O M M O O O M 0MDMW %DWJV> HAHS 14 40 P

a ay at-Za Za a

MC~a,. Zana a *aaaaamuz aa C2

K Va a -2 C2 a aa a = aa a . a

0~ N97 .O-: = = = = =. a

0 ~ ~ -WCD

a N a a m x cm x w m*.a0 W% a, -N.1

a4 M 4.

Z z Kul-n am ZaaMuaauZZX zo z

C 40

Z I'

o; '4 4X; 904 C. a ca9m aat20 v . v-na uu z Z Z uaKc~ zzK za X 4

C C

a .- *o a M .- nZZ C Z Z Z z a z ruCd. aaa a-4

ryn Z- at aa a aa a a L

*14 go= =CDI In a

>) MAa a aK: a2Q m m cCC0 2 0 -a -z z ~ Z4 c z.z

1.. v' ma ao a a~z CO z Z zx 1

co CCe m C%* C3 0- 3 D C

U a9 M 9 m m mo. Q-C

V-1 ~~ aa -a-

~~4.M~~~ a0a a a a0 .. xM.za. t ZZaZZaoZ~ZWK zO 0

a 0

~iv IV..013 U ID

0~ a a -CD-ND C 0 CC . . C .w

C! ~a C! .. 9 9... 9 .

K D V3 NM r)K KZ K O K Z en 0 0 , oC m00 0=

KN 2a0 U) a

I-- - aaa oaa aaa aoa00 a0 1CCu

LU I-. .E

r-4 a w~ 4. 4. m 0 CLiu -- -CL O~L u

I~ ~ WN c; -W-e~ my cm0 ,e- 1 ca

* ~ e 0 inr rn * m m a

C- 14 00 0 0

.4. a~ - ! - .O a u6-%c~w c c a a c c;i6

Z

.4, 0 P. 01 F-.~ MmV~41F 14 m 0 a

co ey l- 000ccbi ,Cn a= '0 C9 9 auuu **

Cd -! 4! jtZ!9 2 9. o

0r C4 8c O -00- 08 a i0 6 4 ;C;C

H4J

gel 0 N 0 0W "4t % 0 86 0 8a

0n M8 8nQC

- - 000 00 ac 0 420=080 a808c*08 U"

0010 ON UCo- 41 0 *

.~: - a*L 0000

0 0D C 14

*J 0 0 -ooL a0 . S NV

4) Go cu- u

aK cS2m== C200 a~L~U 22 0 =uj ~~~~~ ~ C Z- x . 8 88C. U N U .* u 212 CC@z a z z At

01~I~ Iu. ~ U L-u~l .~ 40400000. Uz K '*~@Z I

01 M- *C O t 0 .9 . m1 .0 m - .-C 00N - c .

No 0 !~ .8 o -yww Vw 0 = -, '

T I -. * 10- -n c-D 0 - 3 m .C m m -Dw S 2 0 *9 0; co 0% w ;C w,9 c

000m .9 - - 00O JMooo 20c. =,.. *

H~~~~I 0, Goo,, I- 0 t.~ g . 0 S ~- o"o 0 W!~U @0! . .M N q .. .. v ,c 0 ,0cc 0 0Pr - kn w M M M M 0 w .V V

0 =.M

In C0 .jil ;: EU EEU. 0 0o V1 M .n 0 w'9C 4rM

y-4 4 0 10 N r- 0

0N, 1 T, C; .*1 *N.OE .1 aU ~i F l .1**~0.

M W O O . Nw .0IS EU UE 00 c)eiq N t o0, ;

0 .0 .2P 40w N"n w1 O 0 w CC ow... . 9 9 .2 C3 .92

0O0wo00 0 M xv9 A 1 "no.-.-0. 49 mNNOD; Mlr waIS w"6U0- V90 .9, mm WS.i r.0tO W w .

0U C3 CE 0041 * N . V UN

r- Hq 00 CDCDu*rc, I

oR c2 2S w41m o m o w N 0 'a cc *o * o. 'S 'DeEn NON-.0 N N E En *n *a..0 N - iC ncO ~ ~ ~ a (v * 0 W -0 u c,O ~ ~ L EU i. IS 0 V(~ C N 0000 0--,. N c

0 1~ .l 3I4.) ~ 0 .03 d ND CD 11 ~ S. a.M i 0 **j V *cn -j w ~

a41 00 0b * *0 9 ' N49 v!0 0.9 c4 0o( % -

ccI..I f'I -991 0 .0Ia C2 0n 9~ CD, V ww v 4 "m DG G n IWiN'S~~~ ~~ . M W~q W O .** U00 E (i *** N .0.4 0O N -CD j *c.N U c,'EU U W (a *l c

c3S .. - 00 U q q q U o o 00! q U n m.,ev - a y y o

00'0

u M000u0~a.0 0.0 In00 i. Wa.N . . 00 -* . .4 .!-; cNNU00. rO N a)r.0 i0 .1 loNr c CCOOE =1 . o 1N.U.Wa.U0- . *.ai0 ."

In n I c - v!- w. w ) . . * vaa,. ~ ~ ~ r a, a, w (9 ' 0N 0 0 .9 I41ov~cw c" 0 9 . vo- a 9 . U . i

m.0~g *'S8n - -0- -. , ~ O w - .I~- W o . 00Lai a l N 0 . . S a I S

4 'S OOO-00 qa~qan~uN ,..,000 UU''S'

en v Ln a-oVD-cD oooo -con'n - cneEU c

t~~~~~~zo~~~~4 = u D c oc 1r

5 w5

TI 'I ED 8' "a, w tt

0 In 0 -i -1C

w. v w In In v. -- A

4i 0 SOE ~ 0 5

m ~ or 10 0 Ct *, C, C. Ch -f m

J 4 4 P% P. 04ul at1 c" C.440 f. 0 to to40a in e40

4

UM 40 ,o 140,4

0 P -:11 41%~. C; 4 u.enm.-.- P C; mig . *t 4)~) , 01. *0 C0144 4. V. o.0 . .1 . 40. 0Z A Z A 4 ++

fn r V~a..4) *p

eq1

160 t 40 Cfn C).) C4 ren V W), mas ) r4m I.)%4 6N Wl cc cmCwc

0n 0

c I-

Cl-

N. V= p 'N4

: N - 1 Z V ;:4A P4+

Ln 0 c40 c co 0 .4* = c. - gNy oc 5 !c4 cba4.)O L) so- ~ i-al at c o o t,0 0 0 N r 0 7 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 N0 oQ

Lo 0 01 IOSOM Cp4. CD04 SOD ~ CD0 co04 =14 1%co404 I 0 mm+ == COn IN C IN U) v) N 040.P.

4 ~ Y 4cir . en a,) 4 . ) r, ) CD m C4"NiP Y ClCC, ClC ~ 4

p-4

n 'n 404 Ncc01U 1

LL NO . enI0. M004 rN N4 4. 4 int N4 40 m .0 C; r%- Ch44. -. 1~ 01 pP Q ;t 4U) CL C1 P*

+1. r-~001L ; ;41c 40 *4 4444 11 A c4. * NI , r' V;O co1-4 " m .n 0 .cm - in -: Nn .t t r z - CY , 1) 4n0 e

co COS W) t 40 r-c a i 0 l rIit) ay

.4.~~4 06n NU U

CIS r- in0O e 0Cr, 40 40 Cot. .4p a C0 c 4m=10 0(M 4 N C%# 04400)a; c c Z0 A-1. 4-'j ..a v; c;~ *;l- 47; .E. in.f. AN 4 Nc

0

0 cm v 0 fn Nm Nn -o 0> &0- I l e m l C,9 c

0 -i

U3 r- £0 in 40 404 -n C M4 wc t -e6 "C c rr:a Ac A 1 r; a; V ; An ; w +1

0 10D04D 40 r 0 M.) m 4 0'. m . 0 01 0 CDU a)0 r Fl4," 01 C * W. M3 GO " N-1. in cn In c"wS& cLA0C U N N t- cN C" +

.x co 40 C, 0, -

4004 I.0 0 400W0 go In w- so 0 u

.4 g-1gt

c' aw C 611f I

... ez

0 Iro.

3m 404) 0 ~ Nfh

04 W, fl n in Ii " fl r!

a,

as 9 00 CCo Q!'w . Vqj - -- C~o CC3

01

a Aa6 C, C,

+* C4

.IS=.. .1

4, 4 Z 4 W )

e6 1. .DL

0a iCD CD0 0D0 )I- LnfnC. u C,40 0l -5r

r.. 0 0 MiC 0

CL - fit .f l . . +0

.. +1 . . 1CL CMa'c~ 1C P %C

SO Ch0 encau mi. a C7a 0.Oi- 01 '

0 .4

M unC- c C r

30.

on C 0 a' C4I C) Cc C" 0 .-

*0 CI 4i +1 C;C +

0r0

L 4Ac .4

* = = Da' a'

f--r - %D G~jo cc GoNr Go C-4 % M C r- 4Lfl C4 LA0

r- r- .tO. a%- -WNN ONO aa-000 %a o %c%0%ca N mc

--- D fc % C4 - c - m~V CN c% % C L 00'- -4 m mJ

in0E- -000 ~04 000 00 000 00004iv

C4 C1

E-4J

U1 f - %D X) 4 o 0%~ Lf 0% c 0OD0 ONc C-- %D n i 0 4co 000 00 % O 000 'CSI 0 4 %0 CJEu . . . ": '0000 L %O)tm 000 000 mo0 0000 000C 000 C 0000;C

01

.. ,

00

m 01c 000 000 0-- " 0000 00"0 ONO9 r' 00Ot, 000,C 000~ 000 0000 *000C 000 0000

0

cu CE Eo4 0. U 'D oo-U 0 0- o -- o n c r-o ir c

pq 0wQ00 000 000 0.0

- 0 0 vo - e-

Uf U

;;- MO LfO f L0 n%mV% O.W.4 -- % T~ v% u'+ cz O 0. -7 -T in in Ur% 4.D 0 M C4 ~( P .-A

C; +r *4 *; C 1C f, r ,r . .0 * *4

4 V f'-TULA 'kb %DO- ;'00 UV0%D0 C-40 0 UAN" MtC C 0- UN '0W-. oo or.

- 4 r, V4cn- N-:C OCfr 'aU'L0 Go Go rLL. EU

m~Nt C Cn.4 ECVoo 00- 0000 000N

V W

0

0-0;C C 000 000 000 0000 000H if

E4

M01

UU

r-. W

H W 00 000 000 000 000 00

00 14N.-40 ,400,4OONN 0 0 0 .4004-tONO 000 O44.4,.4P

go4 -4Vq M

V)l o o o o ~ o e oeoe o ae eo ofo~ o4.)C O o ~ O OO C O O OC e O~O of.A O

Cii ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c 0 OO O O O O OO O O O O O O OO Of0NMf

00 400j000000000000 e c o c ce L o4-

0 0 in

44)

0 .u2 N

00 %iI N

-4 44 A4

0) I W0000000000f00000000

P Ch N 0 s-,4

4-I toooooooooocoooo o oe 0

4j z r co N V0000 000a 0 00 0 00 No0 00%0 00 0 0 0"N0 0ac %004

0- w ~ 0 N 4q 4c 4e 0 o4io omo%

(A* 0) 94IO O4 -4NO %D0N10O0 N i 00U fs0 J r-

41 C%4.) cz NI0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 O O 00 O O 0 O 0 .4fO

4-' j

0 04 0

0)

0A V 2 4

01414

Ao t

ck.q 0 4) V0od 93 ~ -4C:4

V>44 0 c %4 fs.cQc0 4M440

d) o.0 0 cl 14 .0 =1-4 w-,-.C 4 A i 0a .-4 to W 0-

'4 .>06 0 w0 V -4 0O 0.-a>1>201 rOJ OU- 941 0 E4 P-4 loo

a JQ - #4 0 Q 0N W 4 A R 00 V1) ..4 $10.0CiI0O2Q Q QNNN C00 IO- 4 >00-41.

G)! Cgql O.rQ N MI -*4141 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P 1 0-4 -0 * Cfuju C) * - 1ig-4 -ia4)~6 l t) V N 0 V W 1 E 4 0.C0NNN 1 .a.4 xI4J U0U'.I 0 EC

-4;pW 4 W 4 W 4)4 0M C0

00.4. . M.

H ,4 M-gntnc0a

u I W.o fn NOh

eng .4

WO ~ 0% LN inw

AOS r fOC n

ciI .

00004.

0 41 CI'(-ENMm 1

~C) NA o

04 --4 01E 0o

cc 0 0 0 0 cCo0 0 oo a aa . a.. q., a.. .* a. :ii:4

o.1 &n r-in(4 lP

fn~~i w 0Q90 c

to 0 iGoc c* o r W. In 9

C4 Waa a %OCa a a

o 9 9Q9 9 9 @9 9 W9 Ct9 9 C')

1 w In ic (n -

wO %o ini v %.1* at a . c ti

- cn

0 0 0e o0a0 0 a a aina In m~ - % v ' w mn @9 m'~i

a 9 Wkin N@N % 9 in % N

. .n ' . . . . 'i . . .-

tw o O0 0a Q, 0 00 0 00 00a0 0 0ci e~n rN@ @9 cm M i0MP 1 40 0 nM

-W ' , "i m)On 9 i ~ 9 04C@9 V)9%"9% @9m%~n V r. CMn N at

in 9aa a oe a oa o a a -Mr I l c

C') n . inr n9 v in C' ina

0 0aoo oo oo 0 0

04c - N -Oc

-~~~ ~~~~ ,0 O n 0 9 2 N ).. % 'i 0 N

9 N r- C

c I*-o oo o o a a

N1 a .- - a ~ f c C

IV c04 o oo o oa o a 1 0-1IW 0J-430,W lW

V)d 0I 00sOooooo81000 00 0 00000000V4 0 aM M hr wf %

I v1 C I 4 r c0M o Ch v 4 0 %D w 0V4

0

0 -H

~ a . . . * * * * . . . . . . . . . .*

0 p m m ,4 .orol ~

r4. 4 0 *

r 44 4 0 P4 0 VM0P 4- A 0 V 4 C o-ow -0

-A C) -h

u 4 4.4 r4P4 4 r4 O 4 4r,4 0, 4 9-4 4 4 4m41J

0d 0

41)

0

8: C: w0 9

41 61 0 0 0 m--a1100

6160 4) r4H-4--.N "A1~ U4 :4 4'I4 s % 4A V0 0a o

a)A0J 4 t :tciI 0 . 90 0 # 4A0C

Table 21

Deths in Feet to Surface of River Bed in Buffalo River

Sediment Survey Study (R4)

DEPTHS IN FEET TO SURFACE OF RIVER BED

Referred to low water datum elevation of 568.6 ft

USAE Transect Position1

1 2 3 4 5

735 13.5 17.8 21.8 -736 10.3 17.8 21.8 -

737 10.0 17.5 21.0 -738 - 18.5 21.5 18.5740 10.0 15.5 20.0 18.5 10.0741 10.7 18.2 22.2 16.6 10.1742 10.5 16.5 22.2 18 .7 6.6743 10.8 15.1 23.2 -

744 10.6 18.1 22.1 -

745 10.0 17.5 24.1 - 10.1746 10.0 17.5 22.1 18.1747 10.4 18.1 25.1 17.2 11.0748 - 18.1 24.6 -

749 9.6 19.1 25.1 17.1750 - 17.8 20.8 18.6

751 - 17.8 20.8 16.4

1Position 1 is nearest the west bank, position 2 is next, andso forth across the width of the channel.

Table 22

Core Length CoUted in Buffalo River Sediment Survey

Study (R-4. Tabe 12)

CORE LENGTH

(cm)

Transect Position

1 2 3 4 5

735 p 54 36 - -

736 66 114 72 -737 p 84 54 -738 - 30 84 56740 42 66 90 98 70741 72 140 78 78 114742 36 21 78 16 54743 60 66 72 - -744 30 45 p --

745 93 93 48 - 76746 78 42 60 p -747 128 94 54 p 30748 - 100 98 --

749 p 109 109 p -750 - 41 35 100751 - 42 114 p

p - Sample taken with Mini-Ponar and assumed to be 8 cm deep.

44

C~. 00 0c

c 1 - -

Go m 0

S .J

U

4W4

CN 0

m I Ico u . ) -j

E-4 .0 m cU

0. (f . 4.

> m

;iu;a 00

0- -. -n -. u -

0

C-4J

0MN

1441*.41

'44

r= -1

a 4E E E

00

N 0) w)

U t E U i- r

.340 z4M ~ c 4) U- 04 () 0 m 4

m 4 L W >

L) &- 4-Li m

0 E

C) 4)

90 Li

co w I"

4-4

ONN

141

CC

j Chac

E - EMI 0

wC

-m

CL

t EU

S II I0 0 !GA

II C -

E *-

z cI i mI L

0 >. 0 C0> - Im u U 4

- md 0 I w

uLAO

cI 003

L) ul*0 0 .C ~ LI -' .2

LA ~ Li 4. L £ L Li

0: L (N NN -. O

to

= w0CO ( N- N (

-so

.000 !-

0

41I

CL LA 04 0c

CL U

90)MNI

'4)

5 V-

41 0 ~ .2 uI-IA

0. C)

00

0 C0

cU d) . -

0 0 d

o < C~~~) 3 -4n

-0IC cc.

4)~~ 4

0-A 0 LA 0m

C-4 m C4 C%)0If- - -

to3>a

41L 0 in- i

a. m .

cm 0

I3 -

'I.m

Ad C LI 43 n

P. L. 0 ~ A 0 0

11 10 E 41 3V 0 m > 0 :1-

4. LA 4. 4 43 4

-. 0 L. m 0 m cc

I3 .- I II. V

U. L.L ,.

w 0

L J ACI.* I

44

0

~Lr%

N N

OD

tN

C 0D

-aJL

C.) 0) 0

0 U IA'

U) 4I4 0

ED m C) 0 0 ED 'UIH > D En 0) 0 U U CD

) C EI0

> 0 A C -M7 E. '4. 0. D)

Cfl '4 - 7 .) 4- 0 '4L0

0y E ED 0..) 0 ED

C 0- 0 ED IA C D

0fo * D4' .. U 0

> cc E0 C 0. I- 14 4 t- mH E 1 V ) >- C) 00 CL. C 0

m E E0 0r EDI>A I- Q) Cc L. 0 ) c

E .-- L- ED CJ (f -J > mJ 0) -)0 .-;7 0) v 0 0 C 0 C __ 4) c 4

>D m CA 0- 4

o- 0 0 > E

0 m) E 0 U 0 <). E

EDD 0. u- V.) E 0) 3; 0 V i V)- O

N ED .0C D C4 ED M- %D 1) C OD

z

0

-0

4.4

II - 0o a,0

C14 C-40

C4 1( d3 L

4c 0

N

M MU

'.3 1

o C 00

.0 EU 4) 003

cc 4.' U)EU

EU 1U 0 34' >1 . IA0

m. m 4) m3'ml .- L. E 0

&J- G- LM Co >2.4.3 4.4 uA

o4 U n 0 n

U) ~ ~ ~ - 08 .0viCCE C-

C 03 E3I -L. 3. 3. .2 C3

cn- 0) 4A 0 0

Vn -0E U EU EU

> EU EU 0 .

1- 0 m 0 0 m .

4nI EU I I V)C

03: EU 03 0 e

0) co6 U61. - 4' ..

44

.3

-, 0000

ci

A.'.

co

C~C-

T .20 0 ". 10

4. m 0~ >0 inC

-- 0 0n M

0 0 V m 0 m0 C 0A . 0

0 0 nIo) > u 0 0(A > 0 0 0 - I

L- r_ 0. U4

on 0 0 0 >Co 4. I 0 0 0A

'-4 U) 0L . IV 4-'

m'0 0'- 0 L. 0 C -4L. C 4. 0n >

U r 4. C7 u o n . .

E-4 0 0 IA 0- 4. 0 41UI.. 4. .0 c 0a.

0( .. U0

"I C- <'>-

CL > A. . .

0~~~ -5 L. . A U) .1 ILU .0 1. C C LA 0> 0 0 m > 0 0 '

< <C 0-

4. > > - U

C - 4. C 0 -

0~~~~ OD 0 0WE I

OL; 0. .C 0

-1 0

04-

-j -

.4) 0

0 0 0V

C14W wo

m -in

co0

C) 4)

00

mC

U. .a-0%

to 0

Table 23b

Total Solids Contents of Sambies (1. Table 1)

Army Sample Identification %~ Total Solids*

D-83-1 0-3' 58.8D-83-2 a-it 61.8D-83-2 1-3' 71.3D-83-3 0-1' 48.3

D-83-4 0-1.5' 53.3D-83-5 0-2' 57.8D-83-5 2-4' 74.0

D-83-6 0-2' 55.5D-83.-7 0-1.5' 53.8

D-83-8 2-4' 57.7

D-93-9 0-2' 63.9

D-83-15 0-2' 52.4

* total solids were calculated after drying the samples to a constant

weight in an oven at 1030C.

Table 23c

Metals (I. Table II)

Sample

Identification Nickel Arsenic Cadmium Chrmium Mercury Lead Zinc

D-83-1 0-3' 50.0 13.6 2.0 59.0 48.4 LT 0.70 95.0 328

D-83-2 0-1' 49.9 10.7 2.0 50.3 39.1 LT 0.71 81.8 283

D-83-2 1-3' 51.9 5.5 1.2 16.4 36.1 LT 0.63 35.9 83.8

D-83-3 0-1' 52.0 10.8 1.8 45.0 41.2 LT 0.93 96.0 372

D-83-4 0-1.5' 56.0 11.1 2.0 48.6 43.0 LT 0.79 94.0 368

D-83-5 0-2' 62.0 9.3 2.0 62.6 46.0 LT 0.69 110 550

D-83-5 2-4' 44.0 1.8 1.2 13.4 22.8 LT 0.66 34.0 86.0

D-83-6 0-2' 51.9 9.4 1.8 43.9 42.1 LT 0.85 104 375

D-83-7 0-1.5' 50.0 9.5 2.0 36.4 40.8 LT 0.89 114 440

D-83-8 2-4' 52.0 8.8 2.0 44.8 46.0 LT 0.75 116 550

D-83-9 0-2' 43.9 12.4 1.6 56.5 37.5 LT 0.72 81.9 258

D-83-15 0-2' 56.0 8.4 2.0 44.2 44.6 LT 0.80 102 480

Source: Mr. Richard Leonard, US Army Corps of Engineers, 5 Dec 1983.Data reported in micrograms per gram on a dry weight basis.LT - less than.

V z v f - m 0

.0

a, a

64-

co 4) 1%

0 I oz " . 4 C4 P- .- 4 0-4 -4

C () ai t P atlt a r-I tat W 0

4) LrOu4". V4 0-4 P40 -1 P-"4 P-4 r-4

H.- OW 0 0 0 0000 CD ;C ;C ;a ;;C ;H aH

.0 0, a

0v - *01 0D' * r u C -4c -

*0-E-4r-4 cc0

CD >%E . . . a . . a at a " a ft I.

C)

d) x'-4 d)

P4 Ml

.010 0ca "I W it le t w at t at le, a n ' 0.

0 0Ln r- %DW 8.406

Qi ..

CoS.)

u ".4

"4 C

C)9- P~P C . -4~ N so8.V 0I I I II0I 1 0.

0t 08.40 C > 08.4'D0w C

P- I I I I I I I I I I I I U C IU) % VN 0 4 0 to

0 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a

-1 J

0 a 0 0 0 000106 1-- 0-6 $-0- - - !;-

J J J - .a - -- 1

3 0 00 00 00 00 00

0)0

CC

14 -C

-44

oo000 o 0 0

0- 0 o *

$- 0 -- " $ 0.

0

co ~ 0 0 0 0R 99 oooRu C C C 0- 0 0. 5 .0- o S.o

XI . . j j a .J . .i . ..j j i I

R C04R 9 R RR R R C

.064

0~~~A 0-.- 0 0 S.- S

60 01

5-0- -0-0 0-0 m~0, 0, 01 0

Sw0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0if

of j65-0-0- .- sco

0 0 a o4

%0 0 V 0 00 J 0

N C; C; C; C; C;0

a) -i j

C I-

>>

P4l Go %>%- y c s% o D M % 0 l OE

*-%14 000 000 000

E- to d) -

41 M

"44

#-4 N 000000000000m n n c

.

0

0

.f4 "4 ,4

- 5- ; A)

P-4J~ 0. 0N

d) (

co coc O C O CDC DC O C

1.4)

44 .

-H-

4)

cooooooooooeeoco

0 0-41 N 4e n0C C ; C ;V

4.)444.) 1

0

S4.4 U0) 60 0' 0*0 cooo00000e0 0eo0=666 eio~sc

o *-r4 .- . . . . .OO O O O O O O",4 4-4 0. Wm 000

M~ 41 1 0

0 w'

U)U

0 Q))

4.) 0

4.)j , , 0r12 4)

c~ co

.,-P4 4)88~ ~D9

p. p.-q~ L

-4 1

0 00 C;C ;C C - 0 - %(

O-N4

.0.0.0.0.0.000000.0.0. . . 0 .~ 00.

0000 0een000 - M 0 -0

0N('4 r-I~O CI0.

0 ~ 00 C000000000O0 0-40LfltUM-.CnEr %a 00 G.- A

0%

H0. 14 0 000- 14U..W~

4

0

0.4 N fn Ir, Vin.1,,o C

I , , I

Table 23h

Buffalo River Sediments - 1989 Data (3)

Buffalo kIver Sedlmnts * 199 Oeta- Aqua Tech Enviromntat CAnsuLtAnts leportmetals fn ag/kg dry weliht •

SWte Mo. Cd - B41k Cr - SuLk Cu * BuLk Fe -Sutk Pb - Sulk Nn - Bulk

27 0.5 21 45 27400 SO56 1 16 50 32800 71 48029 0.5 18 49 30300 82 49054 1 13 46 29200 490

52 1 13 48 28400 62 46053 1 12 46 31900 70 490

s0 0.6 9 40 30800 55 480.

51 0.9 14 48 30700 71 S00

31 0.5 LT 18 49 30300 82 490

49 0.5 9 38 29400 50 560

48 1 2 35 2430 60 520

34 0.6 LT 4 35 20500 25 S30

Arith. Nan 0.8 12 44 28833 63 S00

Std. Oev. 0.2 5 5 3285 15 25

No. of samples 12 12 12 12 12 12

Mi. Value 0.5 2 35 20500 25 430

Max. Value 1 21 50 32800 82 560

(Continued) (Sheet 1 of 7)

Table 23h (Continued)

Buff so River Sediments * 1989 Data * Aqua Tech Environmental ConsuLtants Report

Hetals in mg/kg dry weight

Sit* No. Hg Bulk Ni - Bulk Ag Bulk Zn - Bulk

27 0.5 27 0.5 LT 190

56 0.5 34 0.5 220

29 0.4 31 0.5 LT 210

54 0.37 30 0.5 LT 210

52 0.34 29 0.6 LT 180

53 0.3 31 0.5 200

50 0.25 32 0.6 LT 170

S1 0.41 31 0.5 LT 190

31 0.4 31 0.5 LIT 210

49 0.18 32 0.5 LT 150

48 0.24 25 0.6 LT 120

34 0.06 22 0.6 LT 940

Arith. Mean 0.33 30 0.5 249

Std. Oev. 0.12 3 0.05 210

No. of samples 12 12 12 12

Min. Value 0.06 22 0.5 120

Max. Value 0.5 34 0.6 940

(ContinULd) (Sheet 2 of 7)


suffato i wr Sedllncts 19 9 Data Aq a Teeh lnvlrowmetat consuttants ReportPANs In q/kg

Supe Acmnlphthene Acamaphthytne Anthracen. hflota)Althracane lenzo(arpyrene IenROab)Ftouranthe

zr 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.22 0.83 1.09 1.9156 0.2 LT 0.2 VT 0.16 0.67 1.03 1.9S29 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.13 0.56 0.79 1.5854 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.34 0.93 1.37 2.3852 0.2 LT 0.2 .T 0.16 0.Sl 0.81 1.4553 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.1 LT 0.5 0.82 1.33so 0.2 LT 0.2 Lt 0.13 0.45 0.86 1.49$1 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.23 0.67 1.i 1.8331 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.32 0.9 1.39 2.2849 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.16 0.37 0.77 1.3148 0.2 1. 0.2 LT 0.14 0.46 0.74 1.2134 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.12 0.39 0.68 1.11

Arfth. Mem 0.2 0.2 0.18 0.61 0.9 1.65

Std. 0ev. ERR ERR 0.07 0.19 0.23 0.40

No. of $&1a11 12 12 12 12 12 12

min. Value 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.37 0.68 1.11

max, VaLue 0.2 0.2 0.34 0.93 1.39 2.38

(Continued) (Sheet 3 of 7)


luffsto itve Sediments - 1969 Oate - Aqua Tech Envirotuantat Consultants Report

PAN* in mg/kg

SaspLe Bnzo(gh)PeryLOnS *enzo(k)FLcurnthen Chrysene OIbenzo(a,h)Anthrscen FLouranthene FLourene

27 0.48 0.2 LT 0.94 0.4 LT 1.86 0.3 LT56 0.55 0.2 LT 0.82 0.4 LT 1.83 0.3 LT29 0.4 LT 0.2 LT 0.73 0.4 LT 1.36 0.3 LT54 0.49 0.2 LT 0.96 0.4 LT 2.33 0.3 LT52 0.4 LT 0.2 LT 0.57 0.4 LT 1.3 0.3 LT53 0.4 0.2 LT 0.64 0.4 LT 1.26 0.3 LT50 0.4 LT 0 2 LT 0.63 0.4 LT 1.21 0.3 LT51 0.'. LT 0.2 LT 0.58 0.4 LT 1.78 0.3731 0.66 0.2 LT 0.99 0.4 LT 2.54 0.5549 0.4 LT 0.2 LT 0.49 0.4 LT 1.15 0.3 LT48 0.4 LT 0.2 LT 0.52 0.4 LT 1.05 0.3 LT34 0.4 LT 0.2 LT 0.43 0.4 LT 1.21 0.3 LT

Arith. Mean 0.45 0.2 0.69 0.4 1.57 0.33

Std. 0ev. 0.08 ERR 0.19 ERR 0.47 0.07

No. of samples 12 12 12 12 12 12

in. Value 0.4 0.2 0.43 0.4 1.05 0.3

(Sheet 4 of 7)


luffsao Rivrt Sdimnts * 1969 Oato - Aqua Tech EnvironmntaL ComsuLtants Report

PAN$ in mg/kg

Saple Ifd o(i,2,3-cd)Pyrwwe Naphthalene phenanthrene Pyree

27 0.58 0.3 LT 0.74 0.98

56 0.59 0.3 LT 0.71 0.99

29 0.44 0.3 LT 0.58 0.83

54 0.61 0.3 LT 1.34 1.38

52 0.41 0.3 LT 0.59 0.72

53 0.42 0.3 LT 0.54 0.66

50 0.3 LT 0.3 LT 0.59 0.76

51 0.45 0.3 LT 0.81 1.18

31 0.75 0.36 1.35 1.38

49 0.3 LT 0.3 LT 0.64 0.2

48 0.3 LT 0.3 LT 0.6 0.83

34 0.3 LT 0.3 LT 0.78 0.72

Arith. Mean 0.45 0.31 0.77 0.93

Std. Oev. 0.14 0.02 0.27 0.25

No. of smples 12 12 12 12

Mn. Vatue 0.3 0.3 0.54 0.66

(Sheet 5 of 7)


luffato River Sdiemnts - 199 Date Aqua Tech Envtrormtat Coiauttants Report

Pesticides in ag/kg dry weight

SWpte Atpha-INC sets-INC L indene Naptachtor Neptechor-epoxide Atdrin

27 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.09 0.02 LT56 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT29 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT

54 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT52 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT53 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT

50 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT51 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT31 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT O.O2 LT49 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT48 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT34 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.05 0.02 LT

Arith. Mean 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.02

Std. 0ev. 0.00 0.00 0.00 ERR 0.02 0.00

No. of amptes 12 12 12 12 12 12

Min. VaLue 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02

Max. VaLue 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.09 0.02

(Sheet 6 of 7)

Table 23h (Concluded)

.ffato river Sediments 1999 Data Aqua.Tech Envirommntatl Consuitants teortPesticides in mg/kg dry weight

Sample Oieidrin Endrin p,p-O0T Pp-O0P p,p-OE

27 0.02 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT

56 0.02 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT

29 0.02 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT

54 0.02 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT

52 0.02 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT53 0.02 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT

50 0.02 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT51 0.02 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.0331 0.02 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT49 0.02 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT48 0.02 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT.

34 0.02 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT

Arith. Mean 0.02 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.03

Std. 0ev. 0.00 ERR ERR 0.00 ERR

No. of saptes 12 12 12 12 12

Min. Vatue 0.02 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.03

Iax. VaLue 0.02 0.05 0.03" 0.02 0.03

(Sheet 7 of 7)

Table 24

Summary of Water Quality Monitoring Activities

in the Buffalo River

Sample

Site Period Freuuency TZe Depth Parameters

Surface Water

NYSDEC MP 1.8 1982-86 Monthly Grab 0.5-1.0 m Flow andto bottom Priority

Pollutants

NYSDEC MP 1.1 1982 Twice Grab 1 m below Temp, % Sat,3.7 surface DO, Conduct-5.8 ance, Demand,

Fe, COD, BOD,TSS, TDS, TS,NH3-N, Totalchlorides

NYSDEC 3 1982-86 Monthly Grab 1 m below Flow andsurface Priority

Pollutants

USGS 3 1940-85 Daily Grab Flow, Conven-tional Param-eters andMetals

Groundwater

USGS Allied 1982- Monthly Grab MetalsCheL ical

USACOE Times 1983- Once Grab PriorityBeach Pollutants

i~in44

~~41

-

-4)

4

C

0

0 A

4.4

f-4 a mmnonn~ IIU- It

04 4) T-

C-l

E10

coCo

0-4

Co- -

P1r

010

- 4.

I41.

O-N

C Ic

0f)

Hg ..mu00u000 s

*1-4 .- -w

4.)!

I 0)OO

1n mw1h B ~vW

44.1 0

41

0

rii

-4

II-1 1nl

4 17 ,e 4 C

4) 0r -4l . - ~ ~

44b - *~ N r448 V

t9-

V-q4

-s9

ae Caa0,o

0 . 10 N4c

0 .1

M av*1-4~ ~ .4, Wac aa ma. ara4rt a- . - r rP

U;-W .4 W & lm l toowm Cm

.. 4 C too soq~ C4P aw m- wwa m.-- mr cm N MM I &mc41 r- r-r- ra. ae0 r--r 40a amn &ma em o 0M - :9 P ,c 4fw to 0- ft -; -; V;- ;w .

con

. a~r e-C 04 4 r- 0C ' 0a eva . P t i 0 - 1 C n -4oL -m V e2 *Ng a-w ow Na- V)r m +*e4e t n4C m~~ aern =-. r-a wa ma. aP0 Pea ?.e N. I

is- a, ws N aC' ) in0

vrns C) - at a a4 C o 4ti rn Os' D PM4

-i -t 5.7 -

*r4 a>

a: e

a0 a a Dr .I n nC " na a a ,

9- 6 -t~ rn- ,n- aa1 a9a- O* C3, 0 C3n o~ ,r C; m min aa, a acCD

rr

*d -4 'nax cw n ar0 =a Cm. aa mi3 ma ma 5. C3a

.............................. *6..........................*o* 3co ws inm ea n e ~ m~ in r- r-oae ra%w* -4N- arr m f" nA' OmU .0 t 'n , 40wn -4 wa a0 .n

a,=g in m P. P -3, W04. C In 0 co I" In

-4 C- a=1 . M a h C 0 ni

a.

4a - m w~ m -" n m~ m cm am

on asr .aof 3. N @ N

4.; -1 . u ne QV lo 'a0 - .G c .a ,i

Z z 0 ;a ; r ; a l W

4d6 0 0 N c 0 N am ~ C" , o oGo- fl~W ~adm ~ sfl4

ac-

40 .M0 I Q w C ! 0 5

*Lfl -410 00 vl-

'40 -c- F- C in C e O

Z;I CD c L 0 -- t C

0..

al.0 C. 4 0 4 C2. II2 0

Cl C

a C3 Q 0 N a .t

M IC C>N 00 so-rCC%

04

C 40

00 0D U,+I 400w01+1

L -r

cue 1e n 4e ve

X, 3C3

8 Sel T 4M 44 %Ins r!t . -oO ss c

4-4* 0

4-)j

.. . .. .a4t.) ai =2 in W 4 W a i rmi3 MI MN0 i mW i i i2

0333m3w3

N 00 4c00000m0 20 4000000C

cor-1

0

,4 0 4 o o o o doo

344

IA 00

0 PL04

0 0 141,

~cJ

-44 4 - --4 1-00 O 0 o-e 4 o4 "-4.-40 4 1-4 -4 -4 4,4 0

4J-

0

0

0 r"

I *' '.~I! 10 oON

O -1 as- 9 ;

I00 0; 0 0

*~.40 * .1l~fl*U' .04400

V q U v; C U; A U;tA-v

U! .0 .9V Mt ;U V ;' ;AU ;V 4V AU ;C 4v

E 4

0 00 0 0mmmmmvwmwmmm 0 000 00 0 0 000 000000 00000m0000 0 0 MM0 0 00m

014

* 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0

IIAI" C Ncv;'- Al e c'4Q J sC~, -5 -1A4,1q

NA g N8 IC N 0 Nj V; 1A a a4Vgal

00

-N -- N -

W WW C NV! V!.. N U!-W 0 ~ s qA0 - U U t t ' 4V; 4-6sivnims-M A999 888.88 8 - a m viA 1imi i 0

C; 0 ; C

'AU U AV C U n 9A !A' !Vt~ AC L A(

oil~~~m~ at!9U =9 A, .U 8a a .M M M

C;N1 qC4 N

0~ 000 0 0 00 00 0 00 0 0 00 00 0 00000040000000 L

I. ,-

4 F4, 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 SH00

.0 41-

In -

04

Lfl A

. . .. . . . . . . .

".1

In

0000000 O000r~-0C444.-0-.0.44

~C

InM If0

e~it

0 0 00 00 41;40-

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 ~0S.0,4

a 11 ,

J440

-4

4.30 0 400000 .40 0 0000000.4000000 (

+4 + ++ + + + 4

-4~ -4 -

U00

o +

-4 -4 -

0

900

0 0

000

Or-4 m

0 C- 14 04" 4--4.)

0 d Cd

410

4.)

'- 44~4 0rr.. - -.. 0-' 4 4 1

0 ::s5H0 I8 001

h.4 ~ -. 00-4r3

-4]*0

0

-41

hI+ + ++++ ++

C CD 0 C

+ ++ +.

00

+ +

00 0

.4 4 4. -4 .4

, , ~P. h. C

OmI d

~: ~ (.

'440

oc0000 Oo ~~ oco on400-oo~

.. +.... .. +.......... +.~q e .q4

.

C;j

U!"0 V - -14" 191 Hn in W- %D 1 a tCn anC.41EiNCRff ('I In 0rs4ml m

0 ~ * 0 0 0 .. 1 .00-Um unr

0 000*0000000000 O4

+ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 +. .. 4. 4. +++ +++kn ;?7 w "4nt.

' o 3uuam;miammm... .88 88 .8 oil s00. m- a4 mmim;

0 066066064

00 0000000oo00oo 00-4 000"4000 00

+ .. .. . . . . . ..

0C1 i62 ; ;C ; C

4) E4 . .~ .

0,a

co0

0 n4 J4 4-

~ *i~C11.4 "A -14 1 ". - q .

~W1 1 ~

. .. .0 .. C

MI b.XXZ 0"- = = a =m nw I i

0 0O - 00 0 0

00000- ~-C14 L

en V;aAAV

In I1 --

f illi

000 0 04 ~ 0000-1083 E

-n * 88,88588

a. I A 3r~ Or.

Table 28b

Inventory of Samples (5. Table I1

ATEC Lab Nos. Sample Description Time CollectedInorganic - Organic

Water SaMles

1744-84 11592 25 minutes before dredge 10:25

1745-84 11593 10 minutes before dredge 10:40

1746-84 11594 Wake #1 10:50

1747-84 11595 15 minutes after dredge 11:05




1751-84 11599 Wake #2 13:25




1755-84 11603 Wake #3 16:05


Suspended Sediment Samples

1809-84 Wake 13;25 - 14:25

1910-84 120 minutes after dredge 17:21 - 18:21

Table 28c

Anayses Conducted on Water Samples Collected at Buffalo

River. Buffalo. NY (5, Table I)

ATEC Lab No. 1744-84 1745-84 1786-84 1747-84Identification(Field No.) 1025 1040 1050 1105

25 min. before 10 min. before Wake #1 15 min. after

Arsenic, Ug/i < 1 < 4 6 < 4

Cadmium, pg/1 4. < 4< 4 <.4

Chromium, pg/l < 10 12 24 20

Copper, pg/l < 4 < 4 <1. < 4

Lead, pg/1 50 64 110 84

Mercury, pg/i < 0.3 < 0.3 1.6 < 0.3

Nickel, Ug/1 < 10 12 32 24

Zinc, pg/i 31 24 170 6n

pH, S.U. 7.3 7.3 7.6 7.4

Suspended Solids, 54 51 273 131mg/I

Dissolved Solids, 154 148 139 147mg/i

Oil/Grease, mg/] 1.4 1.2 0.8 4.1

T. Non-Volatile < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01ChlorinatedHydrocarbons, pg/i

T. Volatile ChlorinatedHydrocarbons, jg/] < l.n < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

* Concentrations estimated on the basis of a bromochloropropane internalstandard.

** Concentrations estimated on the basis of an aldrin internal standard.

(Continued)(Sheet I of 3)

Table 28c (Continued)

ATEC Lab No. 1748-84 1749-84 1750-84 .1751-84Identification(Field No.) 1120 1150 1250 1325

30 min. after 1 hr. before 2 hr. after Wake #2

Arsenic, Ug/l < 4 < 4 < 4. 4

Cadmium, Ug/i < 4 <.4 < 4 < 4

Chromium, 1jg/i 20 12 < 10 20

Copper, tJg/l < 4 < 4 < 4 < 4

Lead, Ug/I 84 84 32 68

Mercury, 1Vg/l 0.3 0.3 < 0.3 0.5

Nickel, Ujg/I 24 16 22 28

Zinc, pg/l 68 48 56 140

pH, S.U. 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.5'

Suspended Solids, 142 118 125 301mg/l

Dissolved Solids, 140 146 153 133mg/i

Oil/Grease, mg/l 1.2 3.9 0.6 < 0.5

T. Non-VolatileChlorinatedHydrocarbons, Ug/i < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

T. Volatile ChlorinatedHydrocarbons, )jg/] < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

Concentrations estimated on the basis of a bromochloropropane internal

standard.

** Concentrations estimated on the basis of an aldrin internal standard.

(Sheet 2 of 3)

Table 28c (Concl:ded)

ATEC Lab No. 1752-84 1753-84 1754-84 1755-84 1756-84Identification(Field No.) 1340 1355 1425 1605 1620

1 min. 30 min. 1 hr. Wake #3 15 min.

Arsenic, pg/I < 4 < 4 < 4 5 < 4

Cadmium, pg/l < 4 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 4

Chromium, Ug/i < 10 < 10 < 10 16 < 10

Copper, Pg/I < 4 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 4

Lead, Pg/l 32 32 40 88 36

Mercury, 1g/i < 0.3 0.3 < 0.3 0.5 < 0.3

Nickel, Pg/I 16 12 12 32 < 10

Zinc, Pg/I 48 40 52 180 48

pH, S.U. 7.4 7.4 7.6 7.6 7.2

Suspended Solids, 135 112 115 498 125mg/I

Dissolved Solids, 153 154 153 130 171mg/i

Oil/Grease, mg/I 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

T. Non-VolatileChlorinatedHydrocarbons, Pg/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

T. Volatile ChlorinatedHydrocarbons, pg/i < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

* Concentrations estimated on the basis of a bromochloropropane internal

standard.

** Concentrations estimted on the basis of a aldrin internal standard.

(Sheet 3 of 3)

Table 28d

Analyses Conducted on Susvended Sediment Samples Collected

at Buffalo River, Buffalo, NY. Inorganic Parameters

(5. T-ble M)

ATEC Lab No. 1809-84 1810-84Identification Wake 2nd Hour

Total Dry SedimentWeight, g 12.8 4.3

pg/l Ug/lmg/kg in water mg/kg in water

Arsenic 8 3 8 1.0

Cadmium < 2 < 0.7 < 2 < 0.2

Chromium 25 9.1 26 3.2

Copper 69 25 64 7.9

Lead 96 35 76 9.3

Mercury 0.5 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.01

Nickel 36 13 40 4.9

Zinc 157 57 176 21.4

Iron 22,300 8,160 25,000 3,070

Manganese 690 252 826 101

Note: Metals were determined on dry sediments concentrated from water samples.The equivalent concentrations in the water are based upon the assumptionthat the sediments represent the solids contained in 35 liters of water.

Table 28e

Analyses Conducted on Suspended Sediment Samples Collected

at Buffalo River, Buffalo, NY. Qrganic Parameters

(5, Table IV)

ATEC Lab No. 1809-84 1810-84Identification Wake 2nd HourTotal Dry Sediment 12.8 4.3

weight, g/l

PCB's: mg/ka In water mg/kg in waterAroclor 1016 < 1.0 < 0.4 < 1.0 < 0.1Aroclor 1221 < 1.0 < 0.4 < 1.0 < 0.1Aroclor 1232 < 1.0 < 0.4 < 1.0 < 0.1Aroclor 1242 < 1.0 < 0.4 < 1.0 < 0.1Aroclor 1248 < 1.0 < 0.4 < 1.0 < 0.1Aroclor 1254 < 1.0 < 0.4 < 1.0 < 0.1Aroclor 1260 < 1.0 < 0.4 < 1.0 < 0.1

Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons:

Phenanthrene < 1.4 < 0.5 < 1.4 < 0.2Anthracene < 1.3 < 0.5 < 1.3 < 0.2Fluoranthene < 1.4 < 0.5 < 1.4 :< 0.2Pyrene < 1.3 < 0.5 < 1.3 < 0.2Benzo(a)Anthracene < 1.3 < 0.5 < 1.3 < 0.2.Chrysene < 1.3 < 0.5 < 1.3 < 0.2Benzo(b)Fluoranthene < 2.9 < 1 < 2.9 < 0.4Benzo(k)Fluoranthene < 1.8 < 0.7 < 1.8 < 0.2Benzo(a)Pyrene < 2.4 < 0.9 < 2.4 < 0.3Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene <14.8 < 5.5 <14.8 < 1.8Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene < 7.5 < 2.8 < 7.5 < 0.9Benzo(ghi)Perylene < 8.7 < 3.2 < 8.7 < 1.1

Other Base Neutral Organics:

Hexachloroethane < 4.7 < 1.7 < 4.7 < 0.6Hexachiorobutadiene < 6.8 < 2.5 < 6.8 < 0.8Hexachlorobenzene < 4.8 < 1.8 < 4.8 < 0.61,2,4-Trichlorobenzene < 3.5 < 1.3 < 3.5 < 0M42-Chloronaphthalene < 1.9 < 0.7 < 1.9 < 0.21,2-Diphenylhydrazine < 1.8 < 0.7 < 1.8 < 0.2Hexachlorocyclopentadiene < 9.0 < 3.3 < 9.0 < 1.1

a a . I Ia a a am 00 1 41 a It w ar I

I 41 4

000

41,

I-w Af 0 V ; rtZ 0

0) Nt 4

00

-- w a 0 ftaW.w

a 92 - -q. 0 at 00 a a 004 a a a 0I 4 a a0 a c co;f * 'I

z H 3 U

m- 2- -4a -w a

Table 30

Mean Priority Pollutant Concentrations in Groundwater

Saples at Simnfficant Hazardous Sites

(R-16, Table B.2)

SoO.Atoe O WL - 0.ACAWAMNA

Lake Sri* Stole pivot

site IN0 slie 142 So 5 2al41 Site 141 sit@ Air 5100 AD? Site 10.20bthlohoto A4191ft Time 80.0* Mobil NcR., .9m0 Allied ft11010

steel am*@0 Spoil Oil,0* lO*4 Cole,facilitu op/I U/I .011 o/ of/ I 4q1 211 t/1

ACZ/PR50002C5

2-Gwomophomol 13

p. .- rlho oshoo

2. IinthVl phoool

Acm.pithefl0Ak..wphthylone

1180113 amllfO 000

01481.et~vhoo-Vlppthhieto 17

3-1-Oiioonphthe10o0dOtyeso.

1,2:0ch,1arobnsw&76.7

I 3DchleJ0oo0000

Oiethpiphthato

?lA. 'VIP. heit

e 04hlo:ObUtAdloWo

Reoeehlo:OethoeOopAhhl " IOU 33.3

1 .2.4-ftlChlooboo..e 21 7

C, tbon tetrachloride(2ji*hoe*so" 1743

aiioro foro

runs-1Oichicloo thanoI ,.Pichoropotpooo

fI ,2.0lch1 0:0ro p nc00104-2 n it801:p:0oe2.7Nohyle o l0001.oo 0*10:140 P.h I2Ttto ohlonoeto

11J1ilootheoe

1. ,.fIchloo Ooe

Pinv1 hloride

GA-W! SCDlt .RC

DWI.4 SIoC~

11ST005. TMtAL

Amac 20 10.7 67.3

CAOd. 10.24mOmuaio 20 223 84.6

COppe 4) 472 7.L044 Jig 132113.

0Nn0y 3.2 51.3Nickel 210 272$0100100silver 200.151..SAW. 1SS 261.000

CTSSRRS 1011£ 1

N0ow, y/ as water da.0.8o410l. on o lot other A~mftoe.

R. I441 W! 41 90 0*. *: R 0 - .4

cc Cw @4 w c1 a

- 4, P4 r

0 - 4 A 4 -t

1.

.4 P4 14 M e P- -4

P4 4) -. N N l .4 N -q OD 41 l, Wo

0A .04. w * U, ~ 0444 PI .N I . N N . .

0n ..4 IA4 . 0 * p

H ii

W l ll 44-D r4 E64 a a 40

U0 C4 W! 9A 1000 ~ C; @4 0- EN OD N 40L

404 0 0N 4

00

0

.-..aj 1 0

r- a r-4 444 u IA N4 @4 w .

00 'PO .4IA 1 -- I*4 4 a*4

:> ~ 0. C; a **E J4.0. 441 0 OCU,r4A. :r4~:~

Im IA

0 0 * - IA * p.

$4 An . 0 0 * . * p4 0 rf~. - * * 0 d

w 0 ;;R ; 0! 99 w ; .4 .4 c

0 k0~~0 0 0 .a

0 4~~ 0 4 - . 9-.4d

~~.4 4) 4

41 0 46C

'H~~ 0 0N.

a.- C0 0. P v. - I , .-..04 C 4,I 50

6 9 U uf

444

.

0 IA0

4 coI~ I ~ n a ooev, 0

10 10 049

0d 040~

co rq 0

4.4

0 0

)) P 4 .4)l l g l

00 4

0O M " 0O VI"

Ct .

0 4 A n-inn-il : N x. ) 90 0 00

ij *.4n n~ W~nV ail

ne - ~ .- a19 ne a

53fl5.

*i-I~~~0 I.- U. .5

Table 33

EPA Ptioritv Pollutants and Special Cate-gory Loadings

from Significant Sources by CategoriesIParameters

from December 1981-82 Sarmifin~ (Quantified

Parameters Only) (R-21, Table 2.14)

Sub-AreaSMPI - LACAVMm

Bird Iliand %oCIsavant bass &is mafl Rime Rvre Canal

city of flethlegon mW Smufflo, zofir- PuhblicLekwee awl ml C 8 le4Res SPeel Us

racility Corp. Cop op oe Corp. WT

CAyMORS/AAMIS

AcID 1XRACTMBLI

2,4-iRathylpl, .1 0.310.71

2-mittophoflI - 0.3('0.44-Nitrophenal 0616phenol - 12.0126.4) 12,4.6-richlotopheooo --

SAbSZ/flRAL XXTUACTASLIS

AnthrCen -O 0404.(9.)1amno (a) anthbracen. 3 (.)-- 2342 .3731

Sie2-.thy~hesyl)phtALaeite .(03 - -3371.2. 2-nhiotobonsene--1,4-0lchillrobeflsone --- -0409Di-n-baaty phthalate 0.4(0.9)Fluorefithene .(14 2. 34. 21Pyrom, 0. 61.1"1 4.4(10.1

I I 2.4-?r~chlorbnsene o.seahlocobutadi~fe--

Bromdichlorimmthens--- 0.3(0.7)setesoe- 0.(.)carbon totr&Chloride-- -Chlorobemase- --Cilorotor.- 0.210.4) 3.207.1)athylbenesn -- --

Nethylene Chloride --- 0.4(0.0) 1.2(2.71 12 (9(20.4)l' 1, 2. 2-2,tfehlorcethentTottaChloroeth.lone --- - -Toluene 0.110.2) - - -2.014.5)Irene-I 2-dichloroethylena1, 1 ,-?richlorot=aYriehlaroetihylonsIrmoe-,. 3-diebloroyropen. --

POI1CM ITMAZ. 0.1(0.3) - 010.1) 0(0.1) -010.1)

mmo 01249 0.1(0.2) - -

WAIA. IWAL

Arsenic - 0204ery lim 0.2(0.4) 0.(.) .4(2

Cadeiai - - - .0132Chromium - .S(3.2) % 7 947213)Copper 0.410 0.616 CIM 1.5(0.2) 41.7('00"Lead 0:.9(,1:.9) 31.4470.2) - -- 3.3(7.0) 47.S11051)mercury 0(0) , 0(0.1)vieke I 0.u. S5 1(.) 1.1(121.41SejnM . 3 .(S. 1) -- 0.(113)SLIlvr - 0.4(1.01 0.6(1.4) - .2(11.01ThaelLm - -- - -Sinc 0.6(1.4) 119.6(263.7) 0.841.7) 0.7(0.4) 1.413.1) 2.7(5.9) 134.4(301.1)

CYANI. MOAL. S1(0.21 1.9(4.3) 0.1(0.3) 0.4(1.0) 7.0(15.4) - L2.7(27.9)

PUL (4W4) 0(0.1) 3.910.7) - 0(0) 4.249.3) 0.60(1 4.7(10.3)

CELO~ .nin . - -a . -0 .6 0.41O.6)*

CIMMINATOD ?OZJUUMS N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.. .A. __j .A.

Nma Desh (-) indicate. Paeter enalymed but not quantified. N.A. Indicated pssmte het aeslyead. zero (0) indicates parameteridentified and quantified at les them 0.1 kq/dmy.t *3P-prioity pollow~t chlecobeassas. tospecial PC"n eaniucted for furemn pieity polluteet cllilebosene ad twaety skletelueeee.

Table 34

PAH Concentration2 in Water from Allied Chemical

Outfalls to Buffalo River (R-7. Table 4)

Concentration (ng/L)

COMPOUND Outfall Outfall Outfall001 003 004

FLUORENE ND* ND NDPHENANTHRENE ND ND NDANTHRACENE ND ND NDFLUORANTHENE ND 1.2 5.4McPHENANTHRENE ND ND NDP7RENE 2.1 1.1 2.0MeANTHRACENE ND ND NDBENZOFLUORENE ND ND NDBENZANTHRACENE 0.2 0.1 0.1CHRYSENE 0.3 ND 0.6BENZO(e)PYRENE ND ND NDPERYLENE ND ND NTBENZO(b)FLUORANTHENE 0.2 0.6 0.1BENZO(k)FLUORANTHENE 0.1 ND 0.1BENZO(a)PYRENE 1 0.5 0.5 0.7DIBENZ(a,h)ANTHRACENE 0.1 ND 0.7BENZO(g,h,i)PERYLENE 0.2 0.1 7.5INDENO(1,2,3-c,d)PYRENE ND ND ND

TOTAL 3.7 3.6 17

*ND - Not Detected,-

Table 35

PAH Concentrations in Water from Buffalo Color Water

Outfalls and Intake (R-7. Table A.2)

Corcentration (ng/L)

COMPOUND Intake Outfall Outfall006 011

FLUORENE ND* ND NDPMENANTHRENE ND ND NDANTHRACENE ND ND NDFLUORANTHENE 1.3 5.4 6.0MePHENANTHRENE ND ND NDPYRENE 4.2 5.2 43MeANTHRACENE ND ND NDBENZOFLUORENE ND ND NDBENZANTHRACENE 0.2 0.3 0.6CHRYSENE 0.4 0.4 1.1BENZO(e)PYRENE ND ND NDPERYLENE ND ND NDBENZO(b)FLUORANTHENE 0.3 0.3 0.6BENZO(k)FLUORANTHENE 0.2 0.2 0.3BENZO(a)PYRENE 0.8 0.7 0.9DIBENZO(g,h,i)PERYLENE 0.2 0.1 0.1BENZO(g,h,i)PERYLENE 0.3 13 0.4INDENO(1,2,3-c,d)PYRENE ND ND ND

TOTAL 7.9 25 53

*ND - Not Detected

Table 36

Storm Sewer Sediment Analyses for Priority and

Selected Category Pollutants (R-21. Table AM2

n. MY dr MY as M. Y. F~i . Isd. as I/ t., a.y H* ImU. a Vot a wob, Ao. nt Soil or to co U. to Ovmat U. ont to A.r soJ Covssvi Cf.056

at...tb.IftiSn t

SAWNKITOAL UWCASB

AAMIA0016~i t LV I

bdwe~jZUo"~e LV cf Lr VLLmtq gI It LtI

aesla. .we Lt I*LV-bashe"Wrl "aht.. *-

Ia NW heme"UW

at.4-Niw~~a. VI Ma -

flus aons *L

FRMAthreiw L LV : -p.*ston e LV LV LV t L

cn- f. .L

IJ.-DicisioMtA.M - -

Id-l* 'eb"'y~.

NothVis" *c~ii61idS2'mchdjnrwthvjviw LV LT !rftlus, L L LV1.1 I.?VchWlAJ1mAa. --

?richo ,fiscvleC it - -YAVIchei d --

PvlinSi Chord

A) grisO.Mc -

No-achl -Ho-aN 0 - *ld

UAnlA - is is-Arsenico 4 -. lMoptldue, pa

'ca. u 4"3:

NotiU 0.4..9- 0.9 1."19U 0 25 0. s.o9.

P-PL 14AJ0. . 0.0 0.04

y1*5 .- 60owo isa" e but wequnife

. .'"diu . ft,--x. Ste SO0 sy3te 310 70 *(cVSN.l TO )-tAL 4.4 39 - 3.

Table 37

Pediment Dischare Relationfhiv for the Buffalo River (R-29)

Flow

46 9,400 21,800Sediment Discharge (cfe) (cfs) (cfs)

(Tons/day)

Clay .37 4,420 13,800VF Silt .32 3,870 12,800F Silt .32 3,870 12,800H Silt .32 3,870 12,800C Silt .32 3,870 12,800VF Sand .09 1,100 3,450F Sand .09 1,100 3,450

Table 38Summary of Shoaling Rates (R-29)

Station

5 10 15 20 25YRS X YRS X YRS X YRS Y YRS

0 .85 1.50 2.55 2.60 4.20 4.50 5.59 6.20 7.70 9.5418 .75 1.50 2.25 2.50 3.80 3.90 5.30 5.70 6.80 8.71022 .65 1.50 1.95 2.50 3.25 3.10 4.60 5.00 5.90 7.51729 .60 1.10 2.15 2.50 3.60 3.60 5.05 6.30 6.50 8.02817 .60 0.50 2.60 2.50 3.90 4.40 5.40 8.00 7.00 9.03458 .55 0.50 1.75 2.00 3.00 3.30 4.20 6.00 5.45 7.04003 .35 0.50 1.05 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.20 4.05725 .35 0.50 1.05 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50 2.60 3.20 3.77581 .35 0.50 1.05 1.60 1.75 2.10 2.50 2.80 3.20 3.59148 .55 1.30 1.55 2.80 2.65 2.90 3.65 4.50 4.70 5.19671 .80 1.60 2.30 3.20 3.85 4.60" 4.80 5.00 5.25 5.610215 .75 1.40 2.15 2.90 3.60 4.20 4.45 4.70 5.15 5.610635 .65 1.20 1.95 2.60 3.60 4.00 4.30 4.60 5.15 5.611067 .60 1.00 1.80 2.30 3.00 3.80 4.10 4.50 5.00 5.511610 .55 0.70 1.65 2.00 2.15 3.50 3.85 4.20 4.95 5.712188 .45 0.50 1.50 1.70 2.50 3.20 3.55 4.00 4.60 5.512602 .55 0.60 1.65 2.00 2.75 3.50 3.90 4.40 5.05 6.014036 .75 1.10 2.15 3.00 3.60 4.50 5.00 5.60 6.45 7.314361 .75 1.20 2.15 3.10 3.65 4.60 5.10 5.80 6.60 7.514980 .80 1.40 2.35 3.40 3.90 5.00 5.45 6.10 7.05 8.015823 .90 1.70 2.70 4.10 4.50 5.60 6.30 7.00 8.15 9.016233 1.0 2.00 3.00 4.30 5.10 5.80 6.75 7.30 8.35 9.217695 1.25 2.90 3.90 5.00 5.80 6.70 7.60 8.50 9.25 1018295 1.15 3.20 3.45 5.20 5.75 7.10 8.00 8.80 10.3 1019557 1.65 3.30 4.25 5.50 6.40 7.10 7.55 8.22 8.65 9.520057 1.65 3.30 4.25 5.60 6.40 7.10 7.55 8.10 8.65 9.020855 1.60 3.40 5.00 5.70 6.35 7.00 7.30 7.70 8.30 8.721350 1.60 3.40 5.00 5.80 6.35 7.00 7.30 7.50 8.30 8.822680 1.40 3.30 4.50 5.60 5.90 6.50 6.65 6.70 7.30 7.623828 1.70 3.30 5.00 5.30 5.50 5.90 6.00 6.10 6.50 6.724915 1.70 3.20 4.90 5.20 5.30 5.40 5.45 5.50 5.75 6.025775 1.35 3.10 4.10 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.30 5.526545 1.50 3.30 4.50 4.70 4.80 4.90 4.95 5.00 5.10 5.326985 1.50 3.30 4.50 4.70 4.80 4.90 4.95 5.00 5.10 5.228863 .10 0.00 0.35 0.50 0.55 0.70 0.75 1.00 0.95 1.0

Table 39

Concentration of Selecte Inomanic and Organc Com~ounds in

Dredged Maerial Samples at Timies Beach Confined

Dios20al Facility. 241 (915080) (R-21)

Concentration (ug/9) -/Parameter Maximum mean

Arsenic!/ 58.9 22.7Cadmiuml.. 13.3 11.9Chromiuml' 393 332Copper!/ 269 251Lead/' 1,037 497Mercury 9.4 4.8Nickel ± 63 55Zincl/ 1,854 1,283Bis(2-ethylhexyl))phhalatel/ 5.5 3.0PCB (Aroclor 1242) Y 1.0 0.7PCB (Aroclor 1254)1/ 2.5 1.5Aniline 2.8 2.31 -Ami nonaphthal1ene 4.1 2.7N-Benzyl-ethylani line 7.0 4.54,4'-Methylene-bis(N,N'-dimethylaniline) 1.4 .0.9

pp'-Benzylidene bis(N,NI-dimethylaniline) 4.7 3.3Benzo(a)pyrenelf 96 391 ,2-Oichlorobenzenel/ 9.8 3.51 ,3-Dichlorobenzenel/ 9.5 3.91 ,4-Dichlorobenzenel/ 22 12Naphthal1ene!/ 20 14Phenahthrenel/ 15 13Anthracenel' 13 9.7Fluoranthenel/ 24 17Pyrenel/ 27 17Benzo( a) anthracenel/ 23 12Ch rys end1/ 26 14

I/ EPA priority pollutant

j/HN03 extracted

Compounds identified but not quantified include 4-(dimethyl-amino)

benzophenone, N,N,N',N'-tetramethylbenzidine, chlordane, toxaphene,

diniethyl phthalate. diethyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate, benzylbutyl

phthalate, lindane, heptachlor, aldrin, p,p'-DDE, dieldrin, endrin, p,p'-DDD,

p,p'-DDT, methoxyclor, mirex, and phenol.

Table 40

Concentration of Parameters in Subsurface and Surfac Water

Samles at Timhes Beach. Confined Disposal Facility (R-21)

Concentration (ug/L)

Sub-surface Water Surface WaterParameter Maximum Mean (Single Sample)

Aluminum 95,800 33,810 30,000Antimony 24 8 31Arsenic 1/ 106 67.3 115Barium 2.320 1 929 331Cadmium 1/ 17 10.2 39Chromium 1/ 496 223 758Cobalt 220 73.3 NOCopper 1,250 472 912Lead 1/ 3,560 1,331 2,020Manganese 19,200 7,752 2,930Mercury 1/ 0.96 0.32 NDNickel L/ 659 219 129Thallium 1/ NO ND 66Zinc 1/ 761.000 261,000 3,340Benzene 1/ 370 149 NDChlorobenzene 1/ 4,600 1,743 NDEthylbenzene 1/ 46 29.7 NDToluene 1/ 15 7.6 ND2-Chlorophenol 1/ 39 13 ND1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1' 230 76.7 ND1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 22 7.3 ND1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1/ 120 56.3 NO1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene j/ 77 25.7 NON-nitrosodlphenylamine 1' 48 24 38Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 1/ 81 37 NDAniline 35 11.7 ND4-Chloroaniline 430 143 NDNaphthalene 1/ 100 33.3 NDo-Xylene 32 10.7 NDFluoranthene ND ND 9.2Hexane 2,500 1,533 ND

Y/ EPA Priority pollutantNO Not detected

Other organic parameters tentatively identified and semi-quantified

include: methylcyclopentane, 4-ethyl-2-methylhexane, 4-methylbenzeneamine,

2-chlorobenzeneamine, 3-ethyl-5-methylpyridine, 2,4-dimethylheptane, 1,3-

dimethylbenzene, 3-hexanone, 2-hexanone, 3-hexanol, 2-hexanol, and 1-hexanol.

Table 41

Concentrations of Parameters in Subsurface and Surface Water

Samiples at Small Boat Harbor Site and Buffalo Outer

Harbor Site

Surface WaterSubsurface Water Single SampleMean Concentration Concentration

(ug/L) (uQ/L)Buffalo Buffalo

Small Boat, Outer Small Boat OuterHarbor Harbor Harbor Harbor

Parameter Site Site Site Site

Aluminum 3,690 5,030 234 1,680Antimony,1/ 7 NO NO NDArsenic / 44 17 NO NDBarium 1/ 186 233 NO NOCadmium 1/ 9.8 6.2 ND NDChromium 1/ 122.3 102 NO 19Copper 1/ 94.3 20.7 ND NDLead 1/ 357 124 ND 72Manganese 3,426 5,110 39 311Mercury 1/ 0.3 ND ND NDNickel _/ 47.7 ND NO NDTin 16 25.3 ND NDZinc 1/ 11,136 14,600 14 124Benzene 1/ 21.7 255 ND NDChlorobenzene _/ 834 109 NO NDToluene 1/ ND 2.8 ND NDEthylbenzene _/ 3.7 ND ND ND1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1/ 20.7 ND NO NDN-nitrosodiphenylamine 1/ 23.7 ND ND ND1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1/ 8.7 NO ND NDBis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 11 ND 20 ND NDAcenaphthylene ND 7 ND NDPhenanthrene 1/ ND 1.9 ND NDNaphthalane 1 ND 36.7 ND NDo-Xylene 6 1.9 ND NDFluoranthene 1/ ND 8 ND ND

!-/ EPA priority pollutantNO Not detected

Additional parameters similar to those at the Times Beach site were

tentatively identified at these containment sites.

Table 42

Concentrations of Parameters in Soil Samples from Mobil

Oil Corvoration-Site 141 (915040) (R-211

Concentration (ug/g)Parameter Mlaximum Mean

Methylene chloride -1/ 0.7 0.2Ethylbenzene 1/ 0.09 0.02Fluorotrichioromethane 0.04 0.01Toluene l/ 0.01 0.01Fluoranthene 1' 38 10Benzo(a)anthracene j/15 4.1Benzo(a)pyrene 1/ 15 4.1Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1/15 3.7Phenanthrene 1/ 46 11.9Pyrene 1/ 31 7.9Chrysene 1/15 4.1Acenaphthailene 1/15 3.7Anthracene 1112.7Fluorene 1/ 112.7Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1/600 150

1-1 EPA priority pollutant

organic compounds tentatively identified and semiquantified include:

2-methylbutane, cyclohexane. methylcyclohexane, 1 ,2-dimethyl-cis-cyclohexale,

3-hepten-2-one, 1-methylpyrene, and hydrocarbons.

Table 43

Concentrations of Parameters in Four Soil Samp~le from McNaughton-!

Brooks. Inc.-Site 138 (915034) R-21)

Concentration (ug/g)Parameter Maximum Mean

Lead 1! 520 115Naphthalene 2!6 2Acenaphthylene 1'7 2Acenaphthene 1' 20 8Fluorene 1/ 18 8Phenanthrene 1'59 23Anthracene 21' 23 6Fluoranthene 1'104 35Pyrene 1/ 104 33Chrysene 11 84 21Benzo(a)anthracene 1/89 23Benzo(b)fluoranthene 5 1,jenzo(k)fluoranthene 2!167 48Benzo(a)pyrene j/85 22Undecane 2 0.4

Organic compounds tentatively identified include: 1,4-dimethyl-

benzene, 1 ,2-dimethylbenzene, 2-methylnaphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene,

1 ,1-biphenyl, 1 ,5-dimethylnaphthalene, 2,3-dimethylnaphthalene,

4-methyldlbenzofuran, and (1,1 '-biphenyl)-4-carboxaldehyde.

Table 44

Concentrations of Parameters in Additional Soil Samples

from McNauighton-Brooks. Inc.-Site 138 (915034)

Concentration (ug/g)Parameter Maximum MeanBenzene .1. 0.03 0.02Ethylbenzene 1'- 0.1 0.6Methylene chloride 1/ 0.2 0.07Toluene l/ 0.09 0.02Fluoranthene 1/ 34.2 11.8Naphthalene 1/ 11.2 2.8Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 1'0.1 0.03Benzo(a)anthracene j/25.2 6.3Benzo(a)pyrene 1/ 0.02 .005Benzo(b)fluoranthene and

ben zo(k f1uoranthene j/32.4 8.1Chrysene -25.1 6.4Pyrene 2!60.5 11.8Acetone 0.5 0.12-Butanone 0.09 0.02Carbon disulfide 0.007 0.0024-Methyl -2-pentanone 0.2 0.05Styrene 0.01 0.003o-Xylene 0.6 0.3

Y1 EPA priority pollutant

Additional parameters tentatively identified and semi-quantified

are: 1,7,7-trimethyl--tricyclo (2.2.1.02,6) heptane, Il-ethyl -2-.methyl -benzene,tetrahydrofuran, 3-methyl-2-butanone, 1-pentanol, 2,6,6-trimethyl-bicyclo

(3.1 .1) hepten-2-*one, 1,3- and 1 ,4-diniethylbenzene, benzofuran,

cis-1,2-dimethylcyclohexane, 5-methyl-1-phenyl-hexane, 2-propyloxylbenzene,

1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, l,2,3-trimethylbenzene, and hydrocarbons. The

presence of these volatile hydrocarbons suggests a significant potential forcontaminant migration.

Table 45

Concentrations of Metals in Groundwater Samvies from Allied

Chemical-Site 107 (915004) (R-21)

Concentration (ug/L)Parameter Maximum Mean

Copper 1/ 190 84Lead 1/ 370 173Nickel _/ 900 373Vanadium 30 13

1/ EPA priority pollutant

Analyses indicate low values for pH (3.9 maximum, 3.6 mean). These

pH values would enhance mobilization and seepage of inorganic contaminants to

the river.

Table 46

Concentrations of Parameters in Soil Samples from Buffalo Color

Corporation-Site 120-122 (915012-ab.c) (R-21)

Concentration (ug/g)Parameter Maximum Mean

Arsenil/ 1,870 989Chromium, total!/ 1,050 904Chromium, hexavalent 3.2 1.9Copper!/ 6,200 5,905Lead!/ 57,600 41,900Mercury!/ 138 89Nickel_/ 103 82zinc1/ 2,130 1,4621-Naphthylamine 0.2 0.2Benzidinel/ 1.0 1.0Acenaphthenel/ 1.0 1.0Naphthalenel/ 2.0 1.5Fluorenel/ 1.9 1.5Anthracene!// Phenanthrenel/ 9.6 5.2Fluoranthenel/ 10 6Pyrenel/ 6.7 3.8Chrysenel// Benzo(a)anthracenel/ 4.6 2.8Benzo(b)fluroanthene,!// benzo(k)fluoranthene,1// benzo(a)pyrene-/ 7.9 4.8

Dinitrotoluenel/ 1,000 500

1/ EPA priority pollutant

v 1: c

cgs 06*%4 -.- .

&j u0 92- a~ 4J2" 46*4A 44:%'EL.' 40 *~ 4.' a.- A9 0"aEUS 4 -J9 a V 46J5 ..

r' 0 a0' VfO 4n =-0S,. C 4- c elm ~ 04' 42I~ *u s.,- .L u so2 3C ' 0 'UNV

%- ;~c ' 0. Oc e-0q 4Jl =0 i f-a,. c t'U

4'~ ~~~ a " M; :U- e0 C , 4 C U. C.,-a n 4VC x I a.voe a oC- I.

,a IV0JX0& Z Z4

*U40--O 10 2 0O u' I- v- ' 10.

An- I- 1-*

-c I5- c 4

00 "4-A

C c 41 :0 % 0 0C we 0 ) 4A Cf 10 D" MIci W0 fu v- u o (2- U) t% 06 04 0 L.I.

W U 0 0.

4j

A

0j I. 0 P- I .m

0 C 0 i0ic10 4- W, 0

at MCC

001 0-

0 = u

44' cc '.a 0 '4C e- a0 I4-P 4J .0 acI - 4e - %

4AC Ca

01

0 0 a a 0

C -9 C0 -C -C0 a0 00 2- 0 8

* C 01c 0 0 C 0 0 a 0 0

41) - A. a 3c 4. a a at3

00

41 -

414 r. t 4 41.4U040 ! a0 O4141 C C4. 0 4

0 . 0 0 4C

01 01 N 4 C-144c41 1 - £4 fe U1 C C.6 .

.4 4 1. . CCC S . 'o. ;1 0 e0 m - 41 4.0 *5 0 1 a

00- 414 0. w1 m4 4:1 £cc a. v. U*

1.4 lot 's U

o0 14 C1 - .C£11 1 00 ,4~~I v4 044 0 1- C 41 0 0 1 1.4 01 acU I

4~J W 11 4 U 4.C 4 1U4) £.. 41 a -4 41 Cl m1 01 .O1 0.0cU 6 6c

01 34 D14 4. 41 -4" CU CILO C 010 1 4. C. ;. c. 41 01 U~ 0 1-4. 4. 41U 0 0 cc4 c c44 C 1 1

E- 0 V " I 9 4 c V. R,1 10 e 40 C 10 U, 4114 41 0o Czb Z,P0 46 0. 4. 0141 r1U 1 V: C.. 1 0

1 CU 'a C Z4 mC4 a 14 =e m 00, .E-'~~~ ~ 0 c. a4 41 41U 1 4 ~ 544 4~

co 1- 1- u 4. -1 414wa 1

4.)U 412, " o 0 l 41 Z CIL 4025 .0. 0U1 U4 4 Up s 4. 4. - C Cc. . 1 1 4 4 4

*41 4U1 £4 IsZ -0L 414.4£j CU 4 .4 41 v C1~ 1 4.U T . .

U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 014 Uk 41- C 4 #C .C. 14

z 3 3. 41 a14 -0. 41 4.1 a. - 4

-0 c V.41 :0 c~ £4 U £4 4104 .0 3.,04. 0. C ;= c4 c 1C

£ 0 414 m 14 o.6. XU1- 4,O 40114 14 .

41 14 0411 41- VV. '0, V 10 4 1'* 41 - V4a- t 41V 41C 4. £4 10 0 Z. , 4 U V.: C tor 04In

am -e CL 0 -L 0 0C,0 .0- N .1 m 0C 44. 4.~~ U 44£ U1 14rUO loUw1 144 .4 COC O 4

r .- ~ 41V 41-&0C 40 4- N 50 l1 0 4

4.) 4.41 4.0 41C41 -- ~~414 .l- 01. -' C . 11

0

0<0

.. 4. go 0v- 10

0 V

1-4 0.4

C4C

0-4 -41 ('41 -41

c4 to o 004 C; C

00 M Mv-4 MtI 0%r% 0 0 % v4 00 0 00. 0 0

9: f% % 0 0

C14 co N r4 -4 %q 1-4 N V V

4NL 4.3 N'c o 00 0-4 N0

c 4i co en-4. -4 " - -4 0 -4 -m %01 - -r, - 'nm o o ; C;C C C; ; C

.4 C% 0 -4 r-4 --1 -4 PV4Vo i

rO. WI0 en r4I' C ) tn('1 vvP4 L3 w3 ('T 44

-4'

r-4 1r%0 N CY P-(4 P-4 4 4 . %Go V-4 co N C) 0 00 0-4

N 'o .94m.oC ;C; C ; 8

P-4 -I% 7% -4 4

P-4 NLn 000 0-4m~9 43D 7

(4-4 -

sx 00. ' a)4 0 >1

%..0 %.o o 59. o 4 r.4) t 0. coc tov 0'--'-'.'-- 0... 3 *043 10 M. V3 :3 Ila4 9

".'t~ 5*434 -3 0 w00 0.43 .43,3 C434 % 4) w'- m .. 4.E IJ 0 .4z

>1 0 00 ba 60 6 bo 60 to "1 00 4.3 m0-4 m C 0 0 4'4 -H U 10 %-o -40 0 . .430 I 4l 4130 J34441 0 4) 4) d..a) .. Cw 0 ) 0) -'U .u p 0c O".-1 P1 - .4 3t43 x3 39 ".43 -1 1 (v Z104) " t 0.444i( mx 4U u -C .-

.... o. 1 *.40)4 wA41 V 443ui rdm.W43~43K44J4~430443I.I.4J

0~3 4 -.4 %.4E4 -- 4 Ni V z

-4c

No -41

4 1 > N Ln00 ZO-40Z

-4 % -4 -4 4 -4 0r -4 "

en%0 N7mf 0 0 00 0 0 00 000

%a o 4--- 4 -- 4 -.7 -4 4

N 0 4r 0N00-1 00 00 C 00-000

00.

- 03

rI3 0 -4 'T N4 --4 -00-401000zz

M I4J -mm"o v VVVVrN~4 N

C: -4 40

0 -0. w 03ca0 1 0C 0 c c- wP4

0. 25 0. co1 0 4 ) m t4 A) 4 4. - 00 "' 0 0 E C c

N 1 .01. Cxw . 0 zr 1.. 0>, 0..~ 00o0 cc 00b aI MF4- 0 (0 I"e -4w

-H C CC -4-4 4 U~'-.4. 0. 'c0 >, Wn 4.U) m '4 w0 IV w 30) 0. . .00323-Z , -4 .0 IC 00) 0U4c~ ~ 3tU )t ;Be .0 c. 4 j 03Wi4 (04") P.-4 -4 mm mx~ v 0 r4

-H CO.............(0 W 4j4J*0 4U M M Z X:

0. 0>4 d M ? g0~I 00400 -*'0003 -)cn z U C0 : :E -4 14 NI z

$4~

CO.

0 2 ,A S S B I

w c

4)

0 cm

,r4

a-A

.,I,

.1-4

aV a v m ; aq aj a

cgl U=

5-4 _ _____ _____ ____Is's4

1-40 V1C WI a!a i

C4. C u

* ~~~ ~ ~ I GO a a a B a01 vvwC.

c , a - .4)5..44 Ucc

Xs v

w-am'2XA42

TI 1 31 Sa a1 T '1 a aI 6w alal,

0 * . .

- 0

A en .

4) ~ 0 q 4

ca4 -W

El I- .-W -

$E4 0 c .

42 u

CY- C.. . . N P -t

r. en m r .14 a.

S 0 .1 -

H~~- enG a a a a a a

.. a a .

ICC, -

- C 'A 0~

a. a A a a a a a a z a a a's I I

a0 cU)

.5x

r~ C% 4 N -

ix

inAn

C-4

00N

%a

E-4 -

-,4"

0 tu IL

0 *U

0 CzdC, n 9 N '1

W m 0 t

.0

0 -1 0 IVI

P4 .. "- . . t 1 IUACw 0. ~ 0 C C N

a~~~~L IMI M O .~ N 6.

- 'A

AA 3. Gc5.

Table 53

Key to PolychlorinFnted Biphenyi (PCB) Nomenclature

Desfigiated by International Unon of Pure and

Aogplhed Chemists (1UPAQ~ Numbers (R-l11

---------------------------------------------------------------

PCB (IUPAC) PCB Conxene'

-------------------------------------------------------------------

15 4,4' Dichiorobiphonyl

28 2,4,4' Trichiorobiphenyl

44 2,2',3,5' Tetrachiorobiphenyl

49 2,2',4,5' Tetrachiorobiphenyl

52 2.2',5.5' Tetrachiorobiphenyl

70 2,3',4',5 Tetrachiorobiphenyl

87 2.2'3,4.5' Pentachiorobiphenyl

101 2,2' ,4,5,5' Pentachiorobiphenyl

138 2,2'.3.4.4'.5' Hexachiorobiphenyl

153 2,2',4,4'.5,5' Hexachiorobiphenyl

180 2,2'.3.4.4'.5.5' Heptachiorobiphenyl

-------------------- -----------------------------------------------

* IUPAC =International Union of Pure and Applied Chemists.

Table 54

Concentiations of PCBs and Pesticides in the Soft Tissue

of Elliatio Dilatata (ua/kE wet weiu.ht (R-11)

PCB (IUPAC) *STATION* LOCATION 15 28 52 49 44 70 101 87

BUFFALO RIVER1 Coast Guard 5.7 3.9 5.1 3.2 7.7 9.1 5.2 2.6Station

3 Pili jg across 4.9 0.4 2.7 2.0 (0.1 3.5 (0.1 (0.1Tines Beach

4 Pilings under 5.5 1.5 3.8 2.8 (0.1 5.0 (0.1 1.0skyway

5 Pilings grain 8.0 1.6 3.6 2.7 (0.1 4.5 (0.1 <0.1elevator

6 Across from 8.1 2.4 4.2 5.4 9.0 7.2 4.9 1.8Allied Chemical

7 Cazenovia Creek 4.7 <0.1 0.7 (0.1 <0.1 (0.1 (0.1 0.58 Bridge upstream 5.7 (0.1 1.5 1.1 (0.1 4.2 (0.1 (0.1

from C. Creek9 Past Grassy 8.0 <0.1 (0.1 (0.1 (0.1 (0.1 (0.1 0.5

Island10 Channel across 8.5 (0.1 0.5 (0.1 (0.1 (0.1 (0.1 (0.1

from bridge12 Under highway 5.2 0.7 1.3 2.2 7.6 2.4 1.3 (0.1

bridge13 School Road 6.5 0.6 1.4 0.9 7.4 1.4 0.4 (0.1

LAKE ERIE OUTSIDE TIMES BEACH

14 7.6 2.0 4.5 1.3 15.0 5.7 2.6 (0.119 6.1 1.1 2.8 2.9 9.4 3.1 0.7 (0.120 11.0 0.5 1.4 1.8 8.5 1.8 0.4 (0.122 7.9 (0.1 0.8 (0.1 (0.1 (0.. (0.1 (0.1

INSIDE TIMES BEACH

24 4.1 5.1 14.0 10.0 4.7 14.0 3.4 2.825 6.4 13.0 21.0 15.0 10.0 19.0 5.8 4.2Transect LocationsDO 9.3 25.0 37.0 27.0 23.0 32.0 7.8 5.7D7 5.1 16.0 27.0 17.0 13.0 21.0 3.4 3.6D8 6.8 14.0 24.0 18.0 12.0 25.0 7.8 5.3D8 (float) 3.6 15.0 29.0 22.0 45.0 30.0 11.0 6.5E7 7.2 21.0 31.0 24.0 19.0 30.0 8.4 5.6

E8 6.8 18.0 29.0 22.0 18.0 31.0 9.3 6.2E9 5.0 18.0 31.0 23.0 16.0 32.0 11.0 6.3

# IUPAC = International Union of Pure and Applied Chemists.

* Numbers refer to sites in Figures 4 and 5.

(Continued)

Table 54 (Concluded)

" - PESTICIDESSTATION' LOCATION 153 138 180 op- pp- HCB

DDE DDE

BUFFALO RIVER1 Coast Guard station 7.3 7.3 4.3 1.4 4.2 1.43 Pilings across Times <0.1 (0.1 53.0 0.9 2.3 (0.1Beach

4 Pilings under skyway (0.1 (0.1 1.3 1.1 1.7 (0.15 Pilings grain <0.1 (0.1 1.3 0.9 1.0 0.2

elevator8 Across from Allied 9.6 9.4 7.3 1.2 2.5 1.6

Chemical7 Cazenovia Creek <0.1 (0.1 0.2 (0.1 0.4 0.88 Bridge upstream from (0.1 (0.1 3.6 <0.1 0.9 1.2C. Creek

9 Past Grassy Island <0.1 (0.1 3.2 <0.1 0.7 (0.110 Channel across from <0.1 (0.1 <0.1 (0.1 0.3 0.6

bridge12 Under highway bridge 1.8 2.7 1.1 0.5 1.5 0.413 School Road 1.0 2.1 0.6 0.3 1.0 0.3

LAKE ERIE OUTSIDE TIMES BEACH

14 4.1 5.6 2.4 0.8 3.2 0.819 2.8 3.7 1.5 0.5 1.9 0.820 1.7 2.3 0.9 0.3 1.1 0.522 (0.1 (0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.6

INSIDE TIMES BEACH

24 <0.1 <0.1 (0.1 1.8 6.8 2.425 <0.1 (0.1 0.8 5.8 5.5 1.7Transect LocationsDO (0.1 <0.1 (0.1 8.2 7.6 2.4D7 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 5.9 4.9 1.8D8 (0.1 (0.1 0.7 2.5 6.6 2.2D8 (float) (0.1 (0.1 0.6 3.5 8.2 2.6E7 <0.1 (0.1 0.3 2.4 6.8 2.4E8 (0.1 (0.1 0.5 4.6 7.8 2.5E9 <0.1 <0.1 0.9 2.1 7.9 2.7----------------------------------------------------------------

N +9 +

VV00~

+ +

V 00

A~~i utn c n~

01 4.'

oa ~- '* in a

0

04. 4K 4u

'-4 Wn P . - a,

L j 0 = ;M+ a+=4.) 'n-r P .

- W- o- %n

0z 0 '- 0

- a oo 6: 4;i.O ++L'.

In 4) 0 41 00 C

4 0 'A

'a-W CL 0.

.C' - i L O+9~0 0- c~ 0

CLC

CL0G 0 0.w Cal

0KC0 u GDGI

ai 46 . U

s-I w-- ";'a fi G2D.1 A t Y4 -&

P-~~ CLa A

0~. - .0G

Lj CY 10'~J

O ~ m tn 2. G.CcE "o. L. C;

2-GD 1*. ; Z 18Li ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ) # N ad n.e e q e DDD.D.i

UJ - CN0 j

alc 2, og

go .4 V)C. U 02Ch &

I TI

00 0mC

aa

.H V

45)4~j 'A

W 4>J 06

.,II I

+1 0

C2 4a

9 I L

In C w + nS 0a

0 L: L: 'r

4)L - -u

.145

0 936r-4 '1'U

06E0

0 0-

0 0

'C, 41 a

00 41

In t - 450. S. gx

0 45

= Z4a-oa oa

06 It . S

I~~~~ ~ ~ ~ li I 'N 3a0C E

a 0

040

C')

4I-4

t 1.1

4)

*r4.8

1.1

UU

41~ 14Ju

0- f

Table 58Tvvical EXDosures for Incidental Ingestion of Wae

Whe Swimming (3. Table 6.13)

lo10 Ass$ 0-6 Years Ass@ 7-18 years AWe 19-70 Years LifetimeCone. inWater Intake Intake Intake Intake(mg/1) (r/KG-OAT) (?rv/K0-DAY) (r/KG-DAT) (Mrn/xa-DA

Cadmium. 2.001-03 0 2.751-11 1.2$E-12 5.671-12Choim2.001-02 0 2.751-10 1.281-11 5.67Z1l

Copper 9.001-03 0 1.2491.0 5.77E-12 2.551-11Iran 1.909+00 0 2.631-00, 1.22E-09 5.39Z-09Lead 1.601-02 0 2.201-10 1.03E11 4.54Z-11Mangaesee 1.9-01 0 2.60Z-09 1.212-10 5.36Z-10

Mruy1.701-04 0 2.34Z-12 1.091-13 4.822-13Nickel 5.001-03 0 6.881-11 3.21Z-12 1.422-11Silver 2.001-OS 0 2.751-13 1.28E-14 5.67E-14Zinc 2.901-02 0 3.993-10 1.86Z11f 6.2U1-11Acon~aphthene 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001400 0.001+00Acenaphthylent 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Axathracene 8.051-03 0 1.11E-10 5.15E-12 2.281-11Unzo~aanthracene 1.94E-03 0 2.872-11 1.241-12 5.501-12Benzo(a)pyrene 1.06E-03 0 1.46E111 5.79E-13 3.001-12Denzo(b)fluotanthens 1 841-03 0 2.53E-11 1.1S1E12 5.22Z1.2Benzo(ghi)paryLene 1.831-04 0 2.52E-12 1.18Z-13 5.201-133enzo(k)fluaranthene 0.001,+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.00+0Chrysene 2.151-03 0 2.951-11 1.36Z-12 6.0o112Dibsnzo(a.h~anthbacene o.o01+Qo 0 0.009+00 0.00E+(0 0.001+00Fluoranthene 2.49E-02 0 3.43Z-10 1.601-.1 7.071-11Fluorene 2.62E-02 0 3.611-10 1.6se1-, 1.441-11Indsno(1,2,3-cd)pYrsne 1.87E-04 0 2.581-12 1.201i 5.311-13Naptheaene 2.001-01 0 2.76Z-09 1.28Z-10 5.56110Phenanthrene 3.35E-02 0 4.631-10 2.151-11 0.541-11Pyrene 1.55E-02 0 2.131-10 9.91E-12 4.361-11alph-BBC 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.00Z+00beta-BUC 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Lindane (game-BB) 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Aldrin 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Chlordane 0.001+00 0 0.009+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Dieldrin 0.001+00 0 0.009+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Endrin 0.001+00 0 0.009+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Heptachlar 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Heptachior epozide 1.01X-01 0 1.381-09 6.4SE111 2.851-10Rezachlorobensene 01001+00 0 0.00Z+00 0.001+00 0.001+00lire: 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.00Z+00 0.001+00p,p 000 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00p,p 001 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00p.p DDT 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00PCBG 4,43E-03 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00

Table 59

Reasonable Worst Case Ex~sures for Incidental Ingestion -of

Watr While Swimming (3. Tablet 6.14)

Worse came1985 Ages 0-6 years Agee 7-18 years Ages 19-70 years LietmeCone. inWater Intake Intake Intake Intake(Mg/I) (?flIX-DAY) CIG/KO-DAY) (#0/KG-DAY) (MGIV-DA

Cadmium 4.001-03 0 5.501-11 2.569-12 1.132-11Cbromiu.m 2.001-02 0 2.753-10 1.211-11 5.673-11Copper 1.30Z-02 0 1.791-10 8.33Z-12 3.693-11Iran 3.761+00 0 5.171-01 2.411-00 1.071-08Lead 2.90Z-02 0 3.991-10 1.661-11 S.2=3-11manganese 4.221-01 0 5.811-09 2.712-10 1.203-09.Mercury 2.601-04 0 3.583-12 1.672-13 7.373-13Nickel 8.001-03 0 1.103-10 5.133-12 2.273-11

Silver 2.001-05 0 2.751-13 1.261-14 5.671-14

Zinc 4.401-02 0 6.061-10 2.822-11 1.251-10Acmnaphthene 1.261-01 0 1.731-09 6.061-11 3.571-10

Acenaphthyiene 2.511-01 0 3.461-00 1.61Z-10 7.133-10Anthracone 6.71E-02 0 9.231-10 4.302-11 1.9-10Bento~aanthracene 1.531-02 0 2. 101-10 9.793-12 4.33Z-11Senseoapyrene 4.46E-03 0 6.141-11 2.861-12 1.261-11Benso~bfluorenthene 3.231-03 0 4.451-11 2.071-12 9.179-12Denso(ghi)peryloes 2.241-03 0 3.061-11 1.449-12 6.351-12Senso(kEfluorantien. 2.451-03 0 3.381-11 1.571-12 6.969-12Chrysene 4.67E-03 0 6.421-11 2.99ot-12 1.32Z-11Oibenso(a.hWanthracte. 1.35E-03 0 1.61-11 8.651-13 3.033-12Fluorantheno 5.871-02 0 8.081-10 3.771-11 1.673-10Fluerene 7.951-02 0 1.091-09 5.103-11 2.253-10Indeno(1.2,3-cd)pyreno 2.37E-03 0 3.27E-11 1.521-12 6.73Z112Mapthalone 5.811-01 0 8.001-09 3.731-10 1.652-09Fhonanthrene 1.35E-01 0 1.861-09 68113.341-10?Yven* 3.98E-02 0 8.241-10 3.04-11 1.701-10aiph-BBC 7.309-03 0 1.001-10 4.601-12 2.071-11beta-ABC 4.601-03 0 6.33E-11 2.95E-12 1.301-11Lindane (ga-UC) 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Aldrin 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Chlordane 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.01+00 0.001+00Doldrin 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+O0Endrin 5.801-05 0 7.99R-13 3.72E-14 1.651-13Saptachlar 0.001+00 0 0.003+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Heptachlor epozide 1.811-01 0 2.491-09 1.161-10 5.131-103exachlorobensne 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0,001+00Mire: 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0,001+00p.p ODD 4.061-06 0 5.59E-14 2.611-15 1.151-14p,p DDS 2.741-06 0 3.762-14 1.75E-15 7.761-15p~p DDT 1.061-05 0 1.491-13 6.931-15 3.061-14

FCG4.431-03 0 6. 101-11 2.841-12 1.26E11

Table 60

Typical Exposures for Derma Contact with Surfae Water

While Swimming (3. Table 6.15)

Age specific exposure levels

Ages 0-6 years Ages 7-18 years ASos 19-70 Years Lifetime

1969

Conc. in Absorbed Absorbed Absorbed Absorbed

Water Dose Dose Dose Dose

(a/1i (Iv/KG-DAY) (WD/KG-DAY) (W:I/KG-DAY) ("S/Ko-DA

Cadmium 4.00E-03 0 5.SO-11 2.56E-12 1.13Z-11

Chromium 2.00-E02 0 2.751-10 1.28Z-11 5.67Z-11

Copper 1.3&E-02 0 1.79E-10 6.331-12 3.691-11

Iran 3.7fE+00 0 5.17Z-08 .2.413-09 1.07Z-08

Lead 2.90E-02 0 3.991-10 1.861-11 8.22-11

manganese 4.22E-01 0 5.811-09 2.73-10 1.201-09

Mercury 2.601-04 0 3.56E-12 1.671-13 7.371-13

Nickel 6.00E-03 0 1.101-10 5.13E-12 2.271-11

Silver 2.00E-05 0 2.75E-13 1.28E-14 5.671-14

Zinc 4.40E-02 0 6.06E-10 2.821-11 1.25Z-10

Acenophthens 1.26E-01 0 1.731-09 8.08E-11 3.571-10

Acenpht.hylone 2.51E-01 0 3.46E-09 1.61E-10 7.13E-10

Antr, rcene 6.711-02 0 9.231-10 4.301-11 1.20Z-10

Denso(a)snthracene 1.53E-02 0 2.!0E-10 9.79E-12 4.331-11

Benzo()pyrone 4.46E-03 0 6.14E-11 2.56E-12 1.25 11

Benzo(b)tfuorsnthene 3.23E-03 0 4.451-11 2.07E-12 9.17Z-12

enso(ahi)perylene 2.24E-03 0 3.061-11 1.44E-12 6.35Z-12

Bensa(k)fluorantheve 2.45E-03 0 3.38-11 1.571-12 6.961-12

Chrysene 4.67E-03 0 6.42z-11 2.991-12 1.322-11

Dlbenzo(a,h)anthraceue 1.35E-03 0 1.861-11 8.652-13 3.631-12

Fluorsntheno 5.67E-02 0 8.081-10 3.772-11 1.671-10

Fluorene 7.95E-02 0 1.09E-09 5.101-11 2.251-10

Indeno(1.2,3-cd)pyrene 2.37E-03 0 3.271-11 1.52E-12 6.732-12

Nspthslene 5.81E-01 0 6.00E-09 3.731-10 1.65E-09

Phenanth:ene 1.35E-01 0 1.86E-09 .681-11 3.841-10

Pyrene 5,98-02 0 8.24E-10 3.841-11 1.701-10

alph-BBC 7.30E-03 0 1.00E-10 4.68E-12 2.071-11

betse-BC 4.60E-03 0 6.33E-11 2.95E-12 1.301-11

LUndans (S"ma-3UC) 0.00+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.002+00

Aldzin 0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

Chlordane 0.OOE+00 0 0.001+00 0.00E+00 0.001+00

Dieldrin 0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

Endrin 5.60E-05 0 7.991-13 3.72E-14 1.651-13

Heptechlor 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.00E+00

leptachlor spoxide 1.811-01 0 2.491-00 1.161-10 5.131-10

Hezechlorobensene 0.001+00 0 0.009+00 0.00E+00 0.001+00

Mirex 0.001+00 0 0.00E+00 0.001+00 0.00E+00

p,p DDD 4.06-06 0 5.591-14 2.61Z-15 1.151-14

p,p DDE 2.74E-06 0 3.76E-14 1.75X-15 7.761-15

p,p DDT 1.08E-05 0 1.49E-13 6.931-15 3.061-14

PCBs 4.431-03 0 6.10E-11 2.44Z-12 1.26E-11

Table 61Reasonable Wort Case Exposures for Demial Contact with

Surface Water While Swimnming (3, Table 6.16)

Age specific exposure levels

Wreast Ages 0-6 years Aaes 7-18 years Ages 19-70 years Lifetme1985Cone. in Absorbed Absorbed Absorbed AbsorbedWater Does Do$e Dos* Does(06/1) aaIK-DAY) (IM/Z-DAY) (1MIXODAT) (M/O-DA

Cadiim 4.001-03 0 6.033-07 4.543-08 1.52Z-07Chsomlium 2.002-02 0 3.423-05 2.32t-07 7.583-07Copper 1.301-02 0 2.221-06 1.511-07 4.09-07Iran 3.761+00 0 6.42Z-04 4.363-05 1.439-04Lead 2.90E-02 0 4.09-06 3.373-07 1.103-06Manganese 4.221-01 0 7.213-05 4.903-06 1.603-05Mercury 2.603-04 0 4.443-06 3.029-09 9.863-09Nickel 8.003-03 0 1.372-06 9.299-08 3.031-07Silver 2.003-05 0 3.42Z-09 2.329-10 7.51110Zinc 4.409-02 0 7.521-06 5.111-07 1.671-06Acensphthene 1.261-01 0 2.13-05 1.469-00 4.763-06Acenaphthylens 2.511-01 0 4.293-05 2.929-06 9.533,06Ant)hreene 6.713-02 0 1.153-05 7.791-07 2.543-06Uento~aanthrace 1.53Z-02 0 2.613-06 1.771-07 5.792-07senlo(a)pyrene 4.46L3-03 0 7.621Z-07 5.183-08 1,693-07Denbo~bfluoranthene 3.233-03 0 5.533-07 3.753-06 1.233-07Bensocghiperylene 2.24E-03 0 3.833-07 2.603-06 8.493-08Uenso~kfluoraitbene 2.453-03 0 4.191-07 2.653-06 9.303-08Chrysene 4.67t-03 0 7.97E-07 5.425-08 1.773-07Dibento~a,h)enthrecene 1.353-03 0 2.31Z-07 1.573-03 3,121-01Fluoranthene 5.673-02 0 1.003-05 6.825-07 2.231-06Fluorine 7.959-02 0 1.36E-05 9.23E307 3.01Z-06Indenol.2,3-cd)pyren* 2.37E-03 0 4.051P-07 2.751-08 9.001-08Rapthelene 5.81S-01 0 9.933-05 6.75106 2.209-05Theninthrene 1.359-01 0 2.31E-05 1.573-06 5.143-06Pyrone 5.98S-02 0 1.021-05 6.95E-07 2.279-06alpb-BOC 7.303-03 0 1.251-05 8.472-08 2.771-07bets-BBC 4.60E-03 0 7.861-07 5.34Z-08 1.741-07Lindae. (game-21C) 0.003+00 0 0.003+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Aldrin 0.001+00 0 0.003+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Chlordase 0.003+00 1)0.001+00 0.001+00 0.003+00Dieldrin 0.001+00 0 0.003+00 0.0034P00 0.003+00Endrein 5.803-05 0 9.911-09 6.743-10 2.201-00leptachlor 0.003+00 0 0.003+00 0.001+00 0.003+00leptachior epoxide 1.811-01 0 3.091-05 2.10E-06 6.6-06leuschloraonzene 0.003+00 0 0.003+00 0.003+00 0.001+00Hirer 0.003+00 0 0.003+00 0.001+00 0.001+00p,p DD 4,06Z-06 0 -'.949-10 4.721-11 1.549-10p,p DDZ 2.74E-06 0 4 .672-10 3.18Z-11 1.043-10pp DOT 1.083-05 0 1.853-09 1.253-10 4.10E-10PCU 4.43E-03 0 7.53-07 5.153-08 1.663-07

Table 62TvtDical Exposures for Dermal. Contat with Suspended

Sediments While Swiming (3. Table 6.17)

mean Ages 0-6 Years Ages 7-18 years Ags 19-70 Years Lifetimne1969Conc. in Absorbed Absorbed Absorbed Absorbedsediments Dose Dose Dole Dose

Cdim8.001-01 0 2.541-05 1.041-06 5.601-06Chromum ~ 1.209+01 0 3.811-04 2.911-05 6.19Z-0SCopper 4.400+01 a 1.401-03 1.07E-04 3.191-04Icon 2.861+04 0 9.161-01 6.981-02 2.091-OXLead 6.301+01 0 2.00E-03 1.53E-04 4.561-04Manganese 5.001+02 0 1.591-02 1.212-03 3.621-03Mercury 3.30Z-01 0 1.051-Os 7.99Z-07 2.391-05Nickel 3.001+01 0 9.531-04 7.261-O5 2.17Z-04Silver 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.00Z+00 0.001+00Zinc 2.49E+02 0 7.91E-03 6.03E-04 1.601-03Acensphthene 0.009+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00AcnphthyLeno 0.00S+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.003+00Anthrecone 1.801-01 0 5.721-06 4.361-07 1.303-06Beftseneztbrecene 6.101-01 0 1.941-OS 1.461-06 4.42Z-06Iensoeopyrone 9.501-01 0 3.021-05 2.30Z-06 6.6961O -Ieflso~bftuoranthens 1.65E+00 0 5.24E-05 3.99Z-06 1.202-05Befs(ghi)perylene 4.501-01 0 1.43E-05 1.091_06 3.262-OSBeax0(k)fluorantheue 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.003+00 0.003+00Chrysens 6.901-01 0 2. 19E-OS 1.671-05 5.002-0SDibenaehanthracene 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.00T+00 0.001+00Ylucranthens 1.57E+00 a 4.999-05 3.801-06 1.141-OSFLuorene 3.30E-01 0 I.051-05 7.99E-07 2.391-06IfldefloC1.2,3-CdOPyreng 4.50Z-01 0 1.43E-05 1.091-06 3.26Z-06PapthaLone 3.10E-01 0 9.85E-06 7.501-07 2.25Z-05Phenanthrene 7.701-01 0 2.45E-Os 1.866-05 5.361-06Pyrene 9.30E-01 0 2.95E-05 2.25Z-06 6.74E-OSalph-25C 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00beta-DOC 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Lindan. (uasman-BB~C) 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.00E+00 0.001+00Aldrin 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Chlordane 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.00X+00 0.001+00Otiadrin 0.003+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.00Z+00Indrin 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0,00000leptachLor 0.001+00 0 0.00Z+00 0.001+00 0.00Z+00Keptachlor epozide 4.00Z_02 0 1.271-06 9.661-06 2.09-07Nezachlorobansene 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.00t+00Mirex 040E1+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.00Z+00p.P DOD 0.001+00 0 0.00Z+00 0.001+00 0.001+00p,P DOE 0.001+00 0 0.009+00 0.001+00 0.001+00p~p DDT 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.009+00MEG 0 0.001+00 0. 001+00 0.001+00

Table 63

Reasonable Worst Case Exposures for Dermal Contact with

Ssvended Sediments While Swimming (3. Table 6.18)

man Ixposure Values

Agos 0-6 yeers Age* 7-1 years Ages 19-70 years LifetimeWorse caselossCone. in Absorbed Absorbed Absorbed AbsorbedSediments Dose Dose Does Does(ms/ks) ("IKO-DAY) (OIX/Y-DAY) (CIt1iG-DAY) (Wi/-DAY)

Cadmium 4.302+00 0 1.371-04 1.042-05 3.12E-05Chromium 9.97Z+01 0 3.172103 2.412-04 7.2u-04

Copper 1.571+02 0 4.993-03 3.801-04 1.141-03

Iron 5.55E+04 0 1.761+00 1.34-01 4.02-01

Lead 2.24E+02 0 3.343-03 7.122-04 2.131-03

Manganese 7.331+02 0 2.33E-02 1.772-03 5.312-03

Mercury 1.71E+00 0 5.43E-05 4.141E06 1.241-05

Nickel 4.82E+01 0 1.53E-03 1.171-04 3.491-04

Silver 8.501-01 0 2.70E-05 2.061-06 6.169-06

Zinc 1.209+03 0 3.822-02 2.913-03 6.722-03

Acensphthene 1.00Z+00 0 3.18-05 2.421-06 7.241-05

Acenaphthyleno 1.00E+00 0 3.18Z-05 2.421-06 7.241-06

Anthracene 1.50E+00 0 4.771-05 3.631-06 1.09-05

Senso(a)snthracene 4.GO+00 0 1.52Z-04 1.162*05 3.483-05

Uonso(a)pyrene 4.O+00 0 1.27-04 9.661-06 2.902-05

Uenso(b)fluoranthene 2.90Z+00 0 9.211-05 7.021-06 2.101-05Uenso(Sgh)peryleone 5.501+00 0 1.75E104 1.332-05 3. iW-05

snzo()fluoranthene 2.201+00 0 6.39-05 5.331-05 1.59Z-05

Chrysene 1.501+00 0 4.771-05 3.632-06 1.092-05

Dibento(eh)snthrecene 6.20E+00 0 1.971-04 1.-0105 4.4o9-05Fluoranthene 3.70E+00 0 1.18-04 8.96E-06 2.6e-s5

Fluorene 1.001+00 0 3.18-05 2.429-06 7.241-06Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrone 5.70E+00 0 1.61E-04 1.38-05 4.131-05

NaphaLene 9.00E-01 0 2.86Z-05 2.181-06 6.52E-06

Phenenthrene 3.10E+00 0 9.85E-05 7.501-06 2.251-05Pyrens 3.60E+00 0 1.141-04 8.721-06 2.611-05alph-DEC 4.60E-02 0 1.469-06 1.11Z-07 3.331-07bstaBD-C 2.909*02 0 9.21E-07 7.02-06 2.10Z-07Lindane (ga-NEC) O.O+00 0 0.001+00 0.009+00 0.001+00

Aldrin 0.001+00 0 0.00E+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Chlordane 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00

Dioldrin 0.001+00 0 0.001+00 0.00OO+0 0.00E+00

Endr ln 1.001-02 0 3.16E-07 2.421-08 7.24E-08

Reptachlor 0.00E+00 0 0.001+00 0.00+00 0.00+00

Neptachlor spoxide 7.202-02 0 2.291-06 1.741-07 S.22E-07

lexachlorobenueno 0.00E+00 0 • 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Mires 0.00'100 0 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.00OO0

pp ODD 5.00'-03 0 1.591-07 1.21E-08 3.621-08

p.p D00 1.90E-02 0 6.04E-07 4.601-08 1.381-07

p,p DODT 1.30E-02 0 4.13E-07 3.15E-08 9.421-08

PCES 3 8 0 1.21E-04 9.201-06 2.75E-05

Table 64

Typical-Exposures for Inizestion of Contarmated Fish

(3, Table 6.19)

Lifetime Exposure

Intake

Cadmium 0.001+00Chromium 0.001+00Copper o.0o1+OoIran 0.001+00Lead 0.00r+00Manganese 0.001+00Mercury 1.21E-03Nickel 0.009+00Silver 0.00E+00Zinc 0.001+00Acenaphthone 0.001+00Aeensphthyleno 0.001+00Anthracens, 0.001+00Benzo~aenthracene 0.001+00Senzo(aOpyrene 0. 001+00Benza~b)fluoranthene 0.001+00Senao(ghi perylene 0.001+00Denzoakfluoranthens 0.001+00Chrysene 0.001+00Dibenzo~a~h)anthracene 0.001+00Fluoranthene 0.001+00Fluorene 0.001+00Indeno~l.2,3-cd)pyrons 0.001+00Napthalene 0.001+00Phenanthrene 0.001+00Pyrens 0.001+004iph-BBC 0.001+00beta-BBC 0.001+00Linden* (&amma-BBC) 1.86E-06AIldrin 1.86E-06Chlordane 1.76E-05Oildrin 0.001+00Endrin 0.001+00Reptachlor 0.001+00Septechior spoxide 0.001+00Rexachlorobanzene 2. 799-06Hirez 9.29Z-07p.p DDD 0.001+00p,p DOE 0.00Z+00p~p DOT 5.76Z-05PCIs 4.74E-04

Table 65Reable Worst Case ExgosumC for Ingestion of

ContaminaWe Fish (3, Table 6.20)

Lifetim ExPOlure

IntakeClUIIC-DAY)

Cadium 0.001+00Chrasiua 0.001+00Copper 0.001+00Iran 0.001+00Load 0.001+00Manganese 0.001+00Mercury 2.45E-04Nickel 0.001+00Silver 0.001+00zinc 0,0oz+00Aceaephthene 0.001+00Acenaphthylens 0.001+00hznthracene 0.001+003enROanthracene 0.001+00Sento~a)pyros 0.00E+00Benzo~bfluoranthens 0.001+00BeLze(ahi )perylene 0.001+00Bento~kfluoranthene 0.001+00Chrysene 0.001+00Dibenbo( a, h)anthracene 0.001+00Fluoranthens 0.001+00fluoreno 0.00z+00Indenol1,2.3-ed)pyrons 0.00E+00Naptheilens 0.00E+00Phenanthren* 0.001+00Pyrone 0.001+00alph-SBC 0.001+00beta-BBC 0.001+00Lindans (&am-BsC) 3.77E-05Aidtin 3.771-05Chlordane 3.589-04Dieldrin 0.001+00Endrin 0.00E+00leptachlor 0.001+00Neptachier epoxide 0.001+00Nexachlorobenzene 5.61-05Mire: .9E0p.p DDO 0.00l+CJp,p 001 0.00Z+00ptp DDT 1.17E-03PCBS 9.62LF-03

Table 66Human Health Risk Resulting from Derrnal Contact with

Sediments: Tvvical Case (3, Table 8.1)

Use. 0-6 Years Ages 7-16 years Ages 10-70 Years Lifetime Lifetime

Intek/RZD Intako/RfD !ntake/RfiD Intake/Rf Cancer Risk

Cadmiu 0.001+00 5.011-02 3.871-03 1.161-02ChxMium 0.00Z+00 7.1$E-02 5.481-03 1.641-02Copper 0.002+00 2.149-01 2.021-02 6.01E-02Iron A IA NA NLead NA MA NA IAManganese 0.001+00 7.941-02 6.052-03 1.611-02Mercury 0.001+00 3.499-02 2.661-03 7.972-03Nickel 0.00Z+00 4.771-02 3.631-03 1.091-02Silver OOEO 0.001+00 0.002+00 001o 0.001+00Zinc 0.001+00 3.961-02 3.011-03 9.022-03Acenapbtbene 0.001+00 0.009+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Acenapaithylene NA IA IA IAnthracene 0.001+00 1.91E-05 1.452-06 4.35Z-06Ienzo~aenthracens NA MA NA NABenao(eOpyrene MA NA MA MADenso~bfluoranthens NA NA MA NABanso(Shipey.ene NA MA NA NABenzo~kfluoraathens NA NA NA NChrysens NA NA MA NADibenzo(a.hWanthracens NA NA NA NAFluoranthene 0.001+00 1.25E-03 9.501-05 2.84Z-04Fluoreae 0.001+00 2.621-04 Z.001-05 5.961-05Indeno(1,2,3-cd~pyren* NA NA NA IANapthalene 0.001+00 2.461-03 1.661-04 5.611-04Phenanthreae NA NA NA MAPyrens 0.001+00 9.85E-04 7.501P-05 2.251-04alph-DUC NA NA NA NAbeta-BBC NA NA NA NALindane gam-DIC) 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Aldrin 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0O.001+00Chlordans 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Dieldrin 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Endrin O.:A1+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00lfeptachlor 0.00E+00 0.009+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Reptachlor epoxide 0.001+00 9.771-02 7.451-03 2.232-02 2.64E-05Neeacblorobsenn 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+30 0.001+00Mires: 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00p,p DDD NA MA NA NAP,p DDE NA MA NA KAp~p DDT 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00M38 NA NA NA NA

NA :denote, lack of RfD with which to compute, health risk ratio

Table 67

Human Health Risk Resulting from Dermal Contact with

Water: Tv~ical Case (3, Table 8.2)

Age@ 0-6 years A6es 7-18 Year. Ages 10-10 years Lifetime Lifetime

IntakellID Intake/Mf Itake/Rf Cancerf is

Cadmium 0.00+00 5.832-04 4.642-05 1.522-04 0.001+00Chromu'm 0.001+00 6.451-04 4.361-05 1.431-04 0.001+00Copper 0.001+00 2.901-04 1.971-O5 6.44K-OS 0.002+00Iron NA NA NA NA 0.001+00Lead NA MA MA NA 0.0OK+00

Manganese 0.001+00 1.61E-04 1.10E-05 3.58E-05 0.001+00Mercury 0.OOE+00 9.661-05 6.581-06 2.151-05 0.001+00Nickel 0.001+00 4.27Z-OS 2.90E-06 9.46K-O6 0.001+00Silver 0.001+00 1.14K-0l 7.74K-OS 2.531-07 0.00Z+00Zinc 0.00E+00 2.46K-O5 1.681-06 5.501-06 0.009+00Acenephthene 0.OOK+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.OOK+00 0.001+00

Acenaphthylene NA MA KA NA 0.001+00

Anthracene 0.001+00 4.581-06 3.111-07 1.02E-06 0.001+00

BensocaOanthracene NA NA NA MA 0.001+00

Benzo~a)gyrene MA NA NA NA 0.001+00Benza~bfluoranthene NA NA NA NA 0.001+00

Bonxo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA 0.001+00Benso~kfluoranthene NA NA NA MA 0.002+00

Chrysene NA NA NA NA 0.001+00Dib.ao (a. h) arithrecm NA NA NA NA 0.001+00Fluorazuthene 0.001+00 1.06E-04 7.23E106 2.36E-05 0.001+00Fluotene 0,00E+00 1.12r-04 7.612-05 2.4Ujl-OS 0.001+00Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrens NA NA NA NA 0.001+00Napthalene 0.001+00 6.55E-03 5.81E-04 1.90E-03 0.001+00Phanenthrene NA NA MA NA 0.001+00Pyrene 0.00Z+00 8.801-05 5.981-06 1.95E-05 0.001+00elph-BBC NA NA MA NA 0.001+00beta-8NBC NA MA NA MA 0.001+00Lindane (gam-BC) 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Aldrin 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Chlordane 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Dieldrin 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Endrin 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Heptachlor 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Hoptachlor epoxide 0.001+00 1.32E+00 8.08E-02 2.931-01 3.472105Herachlorobentene 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Mires: 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.00E+00 0.001+00p.; 000 NA NA NA NA 0.001+00p.; 001 NA NA NA NA 0.001+00p.; D0T 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.00E+00PCs* NA NA NA NA 0.001+00

:A denotes lack of RID with which to compute health risk ratio

Table 68Human Health Risk Resulfing from Incidental Ingestion

of Water: Typical Case (3, Table 8.3)

Agee 0-6 Yeats ftes ,.-1g Yeats Age& 19-70 years Lifetime Lietig.Intake/RfW Intake/=W Intako/RID Intake/RfD Cancoer Risk

Camitm 0.001+00 5.50K-OS 2.56Z-09 1.13K-08Crim0.001+00 5.19K-08 2.422-09 1.071-08Copper 0.001+00 2.349-08 1.09K-0ag.2Z0xxon Hil NA NA MALead NA MA NA KMansanes. 0.30z+00 1.30E-08 6.062-10 2.682-00

Mercury 0. 00E+oo 7.60E-09 3.63Z-10 1.61K-OSNickel O.00Z+00 3.44E-09 1.60K-l0 7.09K-10silver 0.40+00 9.17K-li 4.27K-12 1.89K-liZinc 0.001+00 2.00K-0g 9.30K-li 4.11K-l0Aconaphthene 0.00x+00 0.009+00 0.001+00 0,001+00Acenaphthylan. NA NA NA NAAnthrecens 0.00X+00 3.69E-10 1.729-11 7.61Z-11Bensomsanthrecene MA MA NA NABenzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NABento(b)fLuogsnthene, NA NA KA NABenio(gld)Peryltne NA MA MA NABehlsockflueranthene NA HA NA MAChrysene NA HA NA NADibenza(a~h)anthreeno NA MA NA NAFluorenthene 0.001+00 8.58K-09 4.00E-10 1.77E-09fluorene 0.001i+00 9.03S-09 4.202-10 1.882-09Iudeno(l.,3-cd)pyrenq NA NA MA ICANapthalene 0.00Z+00 6.89E-07 3.21Z-08 1.42Z-07Phenmnthrene NA NA NA NAFyrene 0.00E+00 7.09E-09 3.302-10 1.461-09siph-DIC NA MA NA NAbeta-BBC NA MA MA NALindazne (gagna-BOC) 0.00r+00 0.00Z+00 0.001+00 0.009+00Aldrin 0.00E+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Chlordans 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00DOldrin 0.00E+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Induin 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0,00V+00le4ptachlor 0.00E+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00leptechlor epoxide 0.001+00 1.06E-04 4.961-08 2.19E-05 2.59Z-09Hazachlorobenzene 0.00E+00 0.001+00 0.001L+00 0.00z+00Hirex 0.001+00 0.00Z+00 0.00Z+00 0.009+00pp ODD MA NA MA NAp.p 001 NA NA NA NAp.p 0DT 0.001+00 0.00Z+00 0,00E+00 0.00Z+00PCEa NA NA NA NA

NA :denotes lack of RID with which to comnpute health risk ratio

Table 69

Human Health Risk Resulting from Ingestion

of Fish: Tvvical Case (3, Table 8.4)

Lifetime Lifetime

Intake/RfD Cancer Risk

Camium 0.001+00Chromium 0.001+00Copper 0.003+00Iran NALead NAManganese 0.001+00Mercury 4.02Z_02Nickel. 0.001+00Silver 0.001+00Zinc 0.001+00Aconaphthbei 0.003+00Acenspathylene NAAnthracene 0.001+00lenuoalanthrecene NABefso(a)Wrefto NABenzo~b)fluoanthens NANenzo(ghi~perylene NADento~k fluoranthene NAChryc en. NADibento~a ,h)anthracene NAFluoranthene 0. OOE+00Fluorene 0.001+0Indeno(1.2,3-cd)pyren* NANapthbalene 0.001+00Phenanthrene NAPyrene 0.001+00alpb-UC NAbeta-ABC NALindane (giam-BBC) 6.19E-03Aldrin 6.19E-02 2.41E-06Chiordane 2.94E-01 3.16E-05D*Icdrin 0.001+00 2.29E-05Endrin 0.00Z+00Reptachlor 0.001+00leptechlor epoxide 0.001+00Hazachlorobonsene 3.461-03Mirex 4.64E-01 4,74E-06p,p DOD NAV.P DOE NAp,p DDT 1.151-01MSG. NA 1.961-05

NA :denotes lack of RfD with which to compute health risk ratio

Table 70

Total Human Health Risk Summed over all Pathways

(Tical Case) (3, Table 8.5)

A6OU 0-6 yeazs Ags 7-18 years Aes 19-70 years Lifetime Lifetime

Chemical Intake/RfD rntaks/RfD Intake/RD Int-ke/Rf' Cancer Risk

Cadmium 0.00Z+00 5.15E-02 3.92Z-03 1.17E-02 0.001+00

Chaium 0.00E+00 7.26E-02 5.53E-03 1.651-02 0.001+00Copper 0.00Z+00 2.64E-01 2.012-02 6.021-02 O.ooE+00Iron NA N A 1A 0.001+00

Lead NA NA KA NA 0.001+00

Mgnese 0.001+00 7.961-02 5.06E-03 1.81-02 0.001+00

Mercury 0.00Z+00 7.53E-02 4.291-02 4.829-02 0.001+00

Nickel 0.00Z+00 4.77E-02 3.632-03 1.09E-02 0.001+00

Silver 0.00E+00 1.14E-06 7.741-08 2.532-07 0.001+00

Zinc O.OOE+00 3.96Z-02 3.021-03 9.021-03 0.00+00

Aceuaphthene 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.001+00 0.009+00 0.001+00

Acenaphthylene NA NA KA NA 0.002+00

Anthracene 0.009+00 2.36Z-05 1.761-06 5.361-06 0.001+00

Benso(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA 0.00OO+0

Bonzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA 0.001+00

Benzo(b)fluoranthens NA NA NA NA O.O+00

Benzo(hi)pe.rylene NA HA NA NA 0.00E+00

Ienso(k)fluorztehmene NA NA HA NA 0.001+00

Chrysene NA NA NA M 0.001+00

Dibenzo(a.b)anLhraceno NA NA NA NA 0.001+00

Fluorantheno 0.OOE+00 1.35E-03 1.02Z-04 3.081-04 0.00E+00

Fluorene 0.00E+00 3.74E-04 2.76E-05 8.46E-05 0.002+00

Indeno(I,2,3-cd)pyrone NA NA M HA 0.001+00

Napthalens 0.00Z+00 1.10E-02 7.692-04 2.45Z-03 0.001+00

Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA 0.001+00

Pyrene 0.009+00 1.07E-03 8.10E-05 2.44Z-04 0.001+00

alph-BFC NA NA HA NA 0.00+00

beta-BBC NA NA HA NA 0.001+00

Lindane (&sma-AEC) 0100E+00 6.19E-03 6.19E-03 6.191-03 0.00E00

Aldrin 0.00*+00 6.19E-02 6.19E-02 8.199-02 2.41Z-06

Chlordane O.OOE+00 2.941-01 2.94E-01 2.94E-01 3.161-05

Dieldrin 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.291-05

,ndrin 0.00+00 O.OOE+00 0.001+00 0.00Z+00 O.OOE+00

Heptachlor O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.001+00

Heptachlor epoxide 0.00E+00 1.42E+00 9.72E-02 3.16E-01 3.73t-05

Hexachlorobenzene 0.00E+00 3.48E-03 3.48E-03 3.48E-03 0.00E+00

Hirez 0.001+00 4.641-01 4.64E-01 4.64E-01 4.74Z-06

p,p DDD NA NA NA NA 0.00Z+00

p,p D0 NA NA NA NA 0.001+00

p,p D0T 0.00E+00 1.151-01 1.15E-01 1.151-01 0.00Z+00

PCI. NA NA NA NA 1.96E-05

NA : denotes lack of RiD with which to compute health risk ratio

Table 71Human Health Risk Resulting from Dermal Contact with

Sediments: Reasonable Worst-Case (3. Table 8.6)

Ages 0-6 yeas A464 7-16 years Ae1 19-70 Year$ Lifetime Lifetime

Intake/=f Iritae/RID !ntakoIRfD Intake/RID Cancer Risk

Camu0.01+00 2.731-01 2.08Z-02 6.232-02Choim0.001+00 5.961-01 4.551-02 1.36E-01

Copper 0.001+00 9.41E-01 7.17E-02 2.15Z-01Iran NA NA NA NALoad NA NA KA NA

Magns0.01+00 1.161-01 8.67E-03 2.661-02Mercury 0.001+00 1.S11-01 1.381-02 4.132-02Nickel 0.001+00 7.551-02 5.631-03 1.751-02Silver 0.001+00 0.001-03 6.6-04 2.051-03Zinc 0.001+00 1.91E-01 1.462-02 4.36E102Acensphthene 0.00E+00 5.29Z-04 4.032105 1.211-04Acensphthylene NA WA WA WAAnthracene 0.001+00 1.591-04 1.211-05 3.62E-O3Iento~aenthrecene NA NA NA NABenso(a)pyroe NA MA WA WABento(b)fluoranthens NA NA NA WABenso~ghi)perylene NA NA NA NAUenso~kfluoranthos. NA NA NA WA

Chrysene NA NA NA NADibenso(a~h)anthraeens NA WA NA NAFluoranthene 0.001+00 2.241-03 2.24S-04 6.709-04Fluorene 0.001+00 7.94E-04 6.051-05 1.01E-04Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrmn* NA NA NA WANapthelene 0.001+00 7.15E-03 5.45E-04 1.63Z-03Fhenan~.hrene NA NA NA NAPyrene 0.00X+00 3.81E-03 2.911-04 8.69E104alph-BEC NA WA NA NA

2.10E-06bets-BBC NA NA NA NA

3.78E-07Linden@ (Scau-33C) 0.001+00 0.O0l+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Aldrin 0.001+00 0.00K+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Chlordane 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Dioldrin 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Endrin 0.00Z+00 1.061-03 8.07E-05 2.411-04Heptachlor 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Baptachlor epoxide 0.001+00 1.761-01 1.34E-02 4.01E-02 4.751-06Nexachlorobentene 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Hirer 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00p.p DDD WA WA NA NA

661-09P,p DOE NA WA KA HA

4.661-06p,p DOT 0.001+00 6.261-04 6.29E-05 1.88E-04 3.20E-06PCB& NA NA NA NA

2.12E-04

NA ,denotes lack of RID with which to compute health risk ratio

Table 72Human Health Risk Resulting from Dermal Contact with

Water: Reasonable Worst-Case (3. Table 8.7)

A406 0-8 Years Age* 7-18 years Aige$ 19-70 yeas Lifetime Lifetime

Intee/Rr~ tk/RZ I*~/RmCancerInta e/R D I takeRM nta e/Rf In ak*RfDRisk

Cadhmu 0.001,00 1.37t-03 9.291-05 3.03E-04 0.001+00Chrostu 0.00E+00 6.45E-04 4.38E-05 1.43E-04 0.001+00Copper 0.001,00 4.19E-04 2.85E-O5 9.301-05 0.001+00Iron NA M M NA 0.O01+00Load NA ,a.M NA 0.001+00Mananese 0.00E+00 3.601-04 2.459-05 8.00E-05 0.001+00Mercury 0.00E+00 1.8-41.01E-05 3.291-05 0.001+00Nickel 0.00E+00 6.83S-05 4.641-06 1.32Z-05 0.001+00Silver 0.00E+00 1.141-06 7.741-06 2.531-07 0.001+00Zinc 0.00r+00 3.761-OS 2.55E-06 6.34Z-06 0.001+00Acensphthens 0.00Z+00 3.591-04 2.44E-05 7.961-05 0.001+00Acenaphthylons NA M X 0.001+00Anthracone 0.00E,00 3,82E-05 2.601-OS 8.481-06 0.00E+00Bensoawanthracens NA NA NA NA 0.001+00lenzo~a)pyrene NA NA NA HA 0.001+00Senso(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA 0.001+00Benso(gbi)perylene NA NA NA NA 0.001+00Bento(k)fluoranthen* NA NA NA NA 0.001+00Chrysene NA NA NA NA 0.002+00Dibenho(a,)aithracene NA NA NA NA 0.001+00Fluoranthene 0.001+00 2.51E-04 1.70E-05 5.571-05 0.001+00FLueran* 0.001+00 3.40E-04 2.31E-05 7.531-05 0.001+00rndeno(1.2,3-cd)pyren* NA NA NA KA 0.001+00Napthaleno 0.001+00 2.48E-02 1.69E-03 5.511-03 0.001+00Phenarithrens NA NA NA NA 0.001+00Pyrene 0.00E+00 3.41E-04 2.322-05 7.561-05 0.001+00aIph-SBC NA NA NA NA 1.741-06beta-BBC NA NA NA NA 3.141-07Lindan. (gina-BBC) 0.00E+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Aldrin 0.00E+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Chlordans 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Dieldrin 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Indrin 0.00E+00 3.30E-05 2.25E-06 7.33E-06 0.001+00iEaptachlor 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Reptachlor *porlde 0.001+00 2.38E+00 1.621-01 5.2$Z101 6.241-05Eexachlorobentens 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.00E+00 0100S+00 0.001+00Mires 0.001+00 0.00Z+00 0.00E+00 0.001+00 0.00Z+00p~p 000 NA NA NA NA 3.702-11P.p DOE NA NA NA NA 3.53E-11p~p 0DT 0.001+00 3.69E-05 2.51E-07 8.191-07 1.39-10ICBG NA NA NA HA 1.291-06

NA :denotes lack of RfD with which to compute healths risk ratio

Table 73

Human Health Risk Resuld-na from Incidental Ingestion

Water: Reasonable Worst-Case (3. Table 8.8)

Aes5 0-6 years Age$ 7-18 Yeats Agog 19-70 years Lifetime Lifetime

Intake/RiD Intake/RiD Intake/RfD Intako/RfD Canlcer Risk

oalu .001+00 1.101-07 5.131-09 2.27Z-040hoiu .001400 5.19E_08 2.422-ag 1.07E-0S

Copper 0.001+00 3.3GE-06 1.571-09 6.951-09

Iran NA NA NA NALead NA MA NA NA

Manganese 0.001+00 2.20E-08 1.33Z-09 5.951-09

Mercury 0.001+00 1.191-03 5.561-10 2.461-09

Nickel 0.0I~1+00 5.501-09 2.561-10 1.131-09

Silver 0.001+00 9.171-11 4.279-12 1.69911

Zinc 0.001+00 3.03E-09 1.411-10 .6.241-10

Acensphthfle 0.001+00 2.69E-08 1.351-09 5.95E-0g

AcensphthYlefle NA NA MA A

Anthracene 0.001+00 3.08E-09 1.439-10 6.34Z-10

Bento(a)antbracele NA NA NA NAUnsoAa)PYreol NA NA NA NA

Bento(b)iluotrflthele NA NA NA NA

Sento(shi~perylons, NA NA NA NA

3ena~kfuoranthel5 NA NA NA NA

Chrysene NA NA NA NA

Dibento(a.h)anthracens NA NA NA NA

Fluoranthele 0.001+00 2.02E-08 9.421-10 4.161-09

Fluorene 0.001+00 2.74E-08 1.271-09 5.641-09

:ndon@(j.2.3-cd)pyrsne NA NA NA NA

Napthalene 0.00E+00 2.00E-06 9.321-06 4.121-07

Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA

Pyrene 0.001+00 2.75E-08 1.261-09 5.661-09 1321aiph-DEC NA NA NA NA130 0

beta-BBC NA NA NA NA 2.351-11

Lindane (S assa-BBC) 0.00E+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Aldrin 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Chlordant 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.00Z+00 0.001+00Dieldrin 0.009+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Indrin 0.001+00 2.661-09 1.24E-10 5.461-10

Reptachler 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00

leptachlor epozide 0.001+00 1.921-04 6.929-06 3.95E105 4.671-0g

lexachierobensone 0.001+00 0.00E+00 0.001+00 0.001+00Mirez 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00 0.001+00p.p 000 NA NA NA NA 2.779-15

p,p 001 NA NA NA NA 2.641-15

p,p DDT 0.001+00 2.971-10 1.391-11 6.13Z-11 1.041-14

PCSNA NA NA NA 9.681-11

NA :denotos lack of RfD with which to compute health xisk ratio

Table 74

Human Health Risk Resulting from Ingestion of Fish

Reasonable Worst-Case (3, Table 8.9)

Lifetime Lifeti..f

IntakelRfD Cancer Risk

Cadmium 0.001+00Chromium 0.001+00Copper 0.001+00Iron NALead NAManganese 0.001+00Mercury 8.17E-01Nickel 0.009+00Silver 0.001+00Zinc 0.00Z+00Acenaplithene 0. 009+00Acenapbthylene NAAnthraeue 0.001+00Banto~aenthracene NABanso(aOpyrene NABenso(b )fluorantheie NABonxoCghi perylene NABensock)fluoranthene NAChrysene NADibenxoca.hWanthracons NAFluoranthene, 0.100E+00Flisorene 0.001+00Indeno(1,2.3-ed)pyrens NANapthaLens, 0.001+00Phenanthrene NA?yreno 0.001+00aipli-BIC NAbeta-BBC NALindane (gamma-BBC) 1.261-01Aidxin 1.25E+00 4.901-05Chlordane 5.97E+00 6.41E-04Dieldrin 0.00X+00 4.661-04Endrin 0.001+00Beptachlor 0.001+00leptachior epoxide 0.001+00Hexachlorobenteue 7.07E-02Mires: 9.43E+00 9.62E-05p,P DOD NAp,p DDE NAp,p DT 2.34E+00P2s$ NA 3.98E-04

NA :denotes lack of RfD with which to compute health riskc ratio

Table 75

Total Human Health Risk Summed over all Pathways

(Reasonable Worst-Case) (3, Table 8.10)

Ags 0-6 years Ages 7-18 yoear Ales 10-70 years Lifetime Lifetime

Chemicl. IntakolRfD Intake/RfD Intak./Rt Intake/ROD Cancer Risk

Cadmiu 0.00E+00 2.751-01 2.09E-02 6.26E-02 0.001+00Chromium 0.00E+00 5.98E-01 4.562-02 1.361-01 0.001+00

Copper 0.001+00 9.411-01 7.17E-02 2.15E-01 0.009+00Iron NA NA NA NA 0.001+00

Lead NA NA NA NA 0.001+00

Manaanese 0.00E+00 1.17E-01 8.901-03 2.66E-02 0.001+00

Mercury 0.00E+00 9.9E-01 8.311-01 8.58E-01 0.001+00

Nickel 0.00E+00 7.66E-02 5.841-03 1.751-02 0.001+00

Silver 0.00E+00 9.001-03 6.861-04 2.051-03 0.002+00

Tinc 0.00E+00 1.91-01 1.46E-02 4.351-02 0.00+00

Acenephthene 0.00E+00 8.88E-04 6.47E-05 2.001-04 0.001+00

Acenspbthylen NA NA NA NA 0.001+00

Anthracene 0.00+E00 1.971-04 1.47R-05 4.471-05 0.001+00

Benmo() anthracene NA NA NA NA 0.001+00

Bento()Opyrone NA NA NA NA 0.001+00

Dento(b)fluoranthno NA NA NA NA 0.001+00

enso (ghi)perylane NA NA NA NA 0.001+00

Senzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA 0.001+00

Chrysene NA NA NA NA 0.00+00

Dibenso(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA O.OO1+00

Fluoranthene 0.00E+00 3.19E-03 2.41E-04 7.26E-04 0.00E+00

Fluorene 0.00E+00 1.13E-03 8.361-05 2.56E-04 0.001+00

Indeno(1,2.3-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA 0.001+00

Napthalene 0.00E+00 3.20-02 2.23-03 7.14E-03 0.001+00

Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA 0.002+00

Pyrene 0.00E+00 4.15E-03 3.141-04 9.451-04 0.001+00

elph-USC NA NA NA NA 3.849-06

beta-BBC NA NA NA NA 6.921-07

Lindene (S mena-BEC) 0.00+E00 1.26E-01 1.269-01 1.26Z-01 0.00Z+00

Aidrin 0.00E+00 1.26E+00 1.261+00 1.26E+00 4.901-05

Chlordane O.00E+00 5.97E+00 5.979+00 5.97E+00 6.41-04

DLeldrin 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.001+00 0.009+00 4.661-04

Endrin 0.00E00 1.09E-03 6.29E-05 2.49E-04 0.001+00

septachlor 0.00E+00 0.001+00 0.009+00 0.00E+00 0.001+00

eptachlor epoxide 0.00E+00 2.55E+00 1.751-01 5.68Z-01 6.722-05

Nexachlorobensene 0.00E+00 7.071-02 7.071-02 7.07Z-02 0.00E+00

Hires 0.00+E00 9.439+00 9.431+00 9.43E+00 9.62E*05

p,p DDO NA NA NA NA 6.731-00

pp Do NA NA NA NA 4.661-06

p,p DDT 0.001+00 2.341+00 2.341+00 2.34E+00 3.221-08

PCUs NA NA NA NA 6.111-04

NA : denotes lack of RfD with which to compute health risk ratio

LuU

w I

U) 0 z

-o LU~

( C) 0 ZL

LU ii!

00

UlU

000IL MI.- 4c

CLLu

00

16- U

Depew I

-- "Lancaster Lr i jta

5 0 5

B ffl iur2 Loainoth ufoRieAO

rC-4

cot

01

Lij9)

0

0

W U

z ;F

o

DU nL 01 0q q 5z

N

~ ~ i2A0

0j

4@U 4

# 0

U)

--- ..

0 0

-. u) .

.* ~ ~ I zV '

10,

cz, >

im.f~ ........ .-1 _

LL T

t S I -vliiII ~214J .l 'I\

IMI

N . V I

><7

_,unnn

STT 01

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. 2 0 2 ?E0

C T y 0S

jM Un.. F'-~ F. A L 0

Figure ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~T 0d. Buflrie oaio.a 6 iue6

Ns

-

Af 0

r ~r

W.1

66~

%

tS ?

LAKE ERE G5.2 - -

Figre6. Sedmet amlin satonsfo UEP V-LGO5ubproec I 181(R21 Fgue .V

V L~

-bo

U LU

2 SUS.PROJECT(YEAR) AGENCY

£623 ('81 IWO-OA(E)

27('79'81) MOE(M

N 0116(81) USACOE(A)

712('82) USEPA 11(U)

M £13

E14 Ml

U41

U 12 MlEo E 9U3 E

S 0S

Figure~U3 8a. SeietsmlnUie o u-rjc ,2 n

27(R21 Fgues 4.2

1. 0.

Itl Mil" m. IC 0H 1111HIB~rl'mli'I I ~ t .K44

Li U 4zza

Ike- 5m* 3

4," -C*

*8 /7'1

M a.

~8~ V

2000 0 2000C'M= FEET

1000 0 1000 METERS

L AKE ERIE

Figure 8c. Sediment sampling sites in Black Rock Channel (2,Figure 2)

SSPONT~AROGEC

13 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 N12 YSE6) N7toN

14(82)~M1 NYOC4)N3 oN

Fiur 4.4) N

Itu)0 b.~

0 II

751-

'IN\

70 2

7454

744 7 j

740 07 10

1 s 7

~Scale

743

(745-75) c s p

nu r I s

Fi 4r II2 Smln ie nsud rao ufl ieseimntsuve sud b EieCont (-4. Tr2sct(75-51,crsssetonl oston (-5,an&sgmn

741r aeasoson

111T47

745

7449 0

100 0 100 200 Ft.

003 0

1 07443

385

0 2

25 3

6 415 0

Figure 12. Area distribution of PA~s in Buffalo River sedimentsurvey study (R-4, Figure 12). Numbers within segments denoter uber of individual PA~s of high concentration. Shaded segments

have eight or more individual PA~s of high Concentration

16Depew

! .-

V))

Figue 1 occan of w

tR w h (-1 Fig

50 0

hBuffalo River wtrhd(oiidfo -6 iue26

0 4z

CM

cu

D LLz

z0

-iin

w ID>-

201

LAKE NTAR0

NIGR FAL (N.Y.)s

5 0 1 10 SUB-AEAei

Fiur 1. ishage wthsgnfian ladng t2t9

NigaaRier(2 FiuEW .1)

0. 0

V)4.

00

co LXo0. w

Z, (n u.

0

43

U.0

00

00

4, w

ww

ry~

aKWWL

NAGARA FALLS (N.Y)4

SUBA0ENEW YORK.

SUB-AREAA

2518

5~~5 81 OI Koe ~

Figur 18. Site hain a6infcn8oenilfrcnai

nate migatio (R 1A Fiur 3.1

co

413

00

-I 4.3o 0

$4 0

.4 4 3 OD0 i

COOO

00\04

OLaiOaCD 24

R-14 4

0

ooc

0 w

i~u 8 , 48

LU)

z 0,

APPENDIX 1: LITERATURE CITED

1. Acts Testing Labs, Inc. 1983. Analytical Report.

2. Great Lakes Laboratory. 1981. Analysis of Sediment, Water and ElutriateWater Collected and Processed from Buffalo Harbor, New York Sampling Sites,State University College at Buffalo, Open-End Engineer Services Contract Num-ber DACW49-80-C-0053. Buffalo, NY.

3. Laniak, G. F., J. L. Martin, W. W. Sutton, K. P. Brown, C. McConnell, andS. C. McCutcheon. 1990. DRAFT Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment:Buffalo River, New York, EPA/600/***/***. Great Lakes National ProgramOffice, Chicago, IL. and Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, GA.

4. Ohio River Division Laboratories - Soils Laboratory. 1984. ContractReport Number NCB-lA-21JL.

5. Smith, J. A., R. S. Glowacky, and P. J. Crerar. 1984. Analysis of Sus-pended Sediment and Water Samples from Buffalo River - Buffalo, New York,Technical Report Number G0130-07. Aqua Tech Environmental Consultants, Inc.Melmore, OH.

6. USEPA. 1990. REVIEW DRAFT Assessment and Remediation of ContaminatedSediments (ARCS) Work Plan, Great Lakes Program Office, Chicago, IL.

1-1

7A A235 - DTIC · mentation of RAPs for the areas of concern, as well as direction for future...

Documents

Transcript of 7A A235 - DTIC · mentation of RAPs for the areas of concern, as well as direction for future...