791744 - Nota
-
Upload
w-daniel-mira -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
4
description
Transcript of 791744 - Nota
![Page 1: 791744 - Nota](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020219/563db8e3550346aa9a97e8d4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SAP Note
Header Data
Symptom
You use the liquidity invoice and analyze the document chains of the accounting for the determination of liquidity items. In the case that several actual rows are combined by clearing and there is a unique combination of liquidity item, business area, company code for this purpose, you expect a direct assignment of every actual row belonging to the combination found. Example: In the document 001 50 Bank 100- actual 002 50 Bank 150- actual 003 40 Wage/salary clearing 250 Info with HR-PAY item, you expect that each of the two actual rows is displayed on the HR-PAY item. However, this is not the case. Rather the assignment mechanisms FLQAC and FLQAD issue an error if you did not activate the N:M indicator in Customizing. However, if you activated it, the usual representative creation and move occurs with N:M dummy item, therefore: Actual row 001: 100- on dummy outbound Actual row 002: 100+ on dummy entry 250- on HR-PAY (Representative) This seems unnecessarily complicated for this simple case.
Other Terms
FLQAC, FLQAD, RFLQ_ASSIGN_FI, RFLQ_ASSIGN_REX, RFLQ_ASSIGN_INV
Reason and Prerequisites
The representative logic in the N:M case has two aims:
l Avoiding an arbitrary splitting (Payments for liquidity items).
l The second assignment step with reading and evaluation of the invoices should not to be carried out repeatedly, only once.
Solution
Implement the attached correction. When you implement the correction, the system response changes as follows: If there is a unique assignment for several combined actual rows in FLQAC or in the first step of the 2-level mechanisms (for example, FLQAD), the usual N:M processing is not executed (Error or representative), instead each of the affiliated actual rows gets this unique combination of liquidity item, business area, company code directly. In the case of 2-level mechanisms, this is only then the case if this liquidity item is not a buffer item and there is therefore no second evaluation step for these actual payments.
Validity
Correction Instructions
791744 - Unique assignment and N:M logic
Version 2 Validity: 01.02.2006 - active Language English
Released On 01.02.2006 08:43:47
Release Status Released for Customer
Component FIN-FSCM-LP Liquidity Planer
Priority Correction with low priority
Category Program error
Software Component From Rel. To Rel. And Subsequent
PI 2003_1_45B 2003_1_470
2004_1_45B 2004_1_500
Correction Instructions
Software Component Valid from Valid to Number
PI 2003_1_45B 2003_1_470 688961
PI 2004_1_46B 2004_1_500 688967
![Page 2: 791744 - Nota](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020219/563db8e3550346aa9a97e8d4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Causes - Side Effects
Support Packages & Patches
Notes / Patches corrected with this note
Note Reason From Version To Version Note Solution Version Support Package
The table does not contain any entries
The following SAP Notes correct this Note / Patch
Note Reason From Version To Version Note Solution Version Support Package
791744 0 0 821485 1
Support Packages
Software Component Release Support Package
PI 2004_1_45B SAPKIPZI26
2004_1_46B SAPKIPZI36
2004_1_46C SAPKIPZI46
2004_1_470 SAPKIPZI56
2004_1_500 SAPKIPZI66