7 marcelo cortes, bifi pv psda, antofagasta (chile) 2015
-
Upload
sandia-national-laboratories-energy-climate-renewables -
Category
Presentations & Public Speaking
-
view
354 -
download
0
Transcript of 7 marcelo cortes, bifi pv psda, antofagasta (chile) 2015
Dr. Marcelo Cortés C.Director of Master in Energy Development
Luis Alvarez V, Miguel Tapia C. Assistant researchers
High Integration of Solar Energy into Chilean Great Northern Grid
(SING)
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
Chilean systems
2
Sistema Interconectado del Norte Grande (SING)Potencia Instalada : 3698,7 MWGeneración Anual : 15.100 GWh/añoDemanda Máxima : 1998 MWCobertura : Arica y Parinacota hasta AntofagastaPoblación : 6,22 %
Sistema Interconectado Central (SIC)Potencia Instalada : 12.147,1 MWGeneración Anual : 43.254,8 GWh/añoDemanda Máxima : 6.482,1 MWCobertura : Antofagasta a Los LagosPoblación : 92,23 %
Sistema Eléctrico de AisénPotencia Instalada : 40,2 MWGeneración Anual : 121,7 GWh/añoDemanda Máxima : 20,4 MWCobertura : AisénPoblación : 0,61 %
Sistema Eléctrico de MagallanesPotencia Instalada : 98,8 MWGeneración Anual : 268,9 GWh/añoDemanda Máxima : 49,3 MWCobertura : MagallanesPoblación : 0,93 %
Installed capacity: 3, 6 GWEnergy: 15,1 TWh/yr
Max Load: 2 GWLoad Factor 80%
Installed capacity: 12,1 GWEnergy: 43,2 TWh/yrMax Load: 6,5 GWLoad Factor 60%
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
3
Great Northern Grid. Installed Capacity 2014
Coal, GNL, Diesel, Oil 96,7%3487 MW
Wind 1%90 MW PV 0,5%
23 MW
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
4
Characteristic of Demand, SING
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
0 50 100 150 200
De
man
da
[MW
]
Hora
Demand Time SING Week January 1, 2013
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0,0
4,4
8,7
13
,1
17
,4
21
,8
26
,1
30
,5
34
,8
39
,2
43
,5
47
,8
52
,2
56
,5
60
,9
65
,2
69
,6
73
,9
78
,3
82
,6
87
,0
91
,3
95
,7
Po
ten
cia
[MW
]
Load duration curve SING 2013
Estimation 2013Load Factor: Fc = 0,80Prob (Pd > 2000) = 1,13%
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23
De
man
da
[MW
]
Average hourly demand curve SING
Med-3*Std
Med+3*Std
Media
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
5
Law 20.698 (2013). Renewables Obligations (RO)
The electric companies (GENCOS) must inject a percentage of their energy from renewable sources.
5,0
5,0
5,0
5,0
5,5
6,0
6,5
7,0
7,5
8,0
8,5
9,0
9,5
10
,0
10
,0
5,0
5,0
5,0
6,0
7,0
8,0
9,0
10
,0
11
,0
12
,0 1
3,5
15
,0 1
6,5
18
,0
20
,0
2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 7 2 0 1 8 2 0 1 9 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 4 2 0 2 5
ENER
GY
GEN
ERA
TED
WIT
H R
ENEW
AB
LES
[%]
YEARS
20.698 LAW. RENEWABLES OBLIGATIONS (RO)
RO for contracts afterJuly 1, 2013
RO for contractsbetween
Aug 31 2007 and July 1, 2013
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
6
Great Northern Grid. Future Interconetions
SADISalta
Argentina408 km,1x345 kV700 MVABuilt 1999
Don’t workingRestarted 2016
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
7
Great Northern Grid. Future Interconetions
COESPerú
2x220 kV400 MVA
stage negotiations
Maybe 2020?
SADISalta
Argentina408 km,1x345 kV700 MVABuilt 1999
Don’t workingRestarted 2016
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
8
Great Northern Grid. Future Interconetions
COESPerú
2x220 kV400 MVA
stage negotiations
Maybe 2020?
SADISalta
Argentina408 km,1x345 kV700 MVABuilt 1999
Don’t workingRestarted 2016
AES-Gener
SICChile
580 km,2x500 kV
2x1500 MVA2017-2020
Investor EC-L
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
9
Great Northern Grid. Loads forescasts
0
10
20
30
40
50
6020
12
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
En
erg
yp
er y
esal
SIN
G (
TW
h)
Proyección CNE Proyección CDEC-SING Base Proyección CDEC-SING Alta
Forecast of electricity demand SING. Source CNE (Energy National Commission, 2012)
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
10
Great Northern Grid. Future Interconetions
COESPerú
2x220 kV400 MVA
stage negotiations
Maybe 2020?
SADISalta
Argentina408 km,1x345 kV700 MVABuilt 1999
Don’t workingRestarted 2016
SICChile
580 km,2x500 kV
2x1500 MVA2017
Investor EC-L
Investment, costs, prices, profitability, adequacy, security
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
11
Solar Energy. Our strategy
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
Analyze the integration of large-scalesolar energy in the SING
12
Objetives
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
13
Generation
Planning
• Horizon analysis around of 10 - 30 years
• Determination of the optimal power stations to be installed (When, Where, How, Type)
Transmission expansion planning
• Horizon analysis around of 10 - 30 years
• Optimal transmission expansion planning (When, Where, How, Type)
Operational planning
• Horizon analysis around de 1 a 20 años
• Determination of operating costs and prices (marginal costs of energy)
Analysis methodology
14
Minimum investment
cost, operation and fault
Demand forecasting
Forecast fuel prices
legal constraints
Cost estimation
technologies
Generation planning
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
15
Optimization model for generation planning
,PC
MkSLFSPFpta
MkSLSPFpta
MkNiPC
CFppDCFpp
SPbCaCTMin
iki
kkERNCk
N
i
ERNCiki
kkk
N
i
iki
iki
N
Nj
jj
N
i
ii
N
i
M
k
kiki
N
i
ii
0
,..,1 ;
,..,1 ;
,..,1 ,,..,1 ; 0
- s.a.
1
1
1
11
max
1 11
1
1
1
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
16
Futures and scenarios considered
FuturesF1. Developing without renewables obligationsF2. Developing with renewables obligations (20/25)F3. Developing with natural gas price low
Scenarios (sensibilities)S1. 10% energy is exported to Argentina (2016)S2. Central CTM (EC-L) is retired of SING and its
energy injected to SIC (2017)S3. 10% energy exported to Argentina plus CTM
retired of SING.
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
17Internal workshop - Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th November 2014
Results for diferents futures. Installed capacity0,2% 0,8%
1,5%0,0% 2,0%
55,3%
2,2%3,6%
34,0%
0,3%
Hidro de Pasada
Geotérmica
Eólica
Solar Térmica
Solar Fotovoltaica
Carbón
Diesel
Fuel-Oil
Gas Natural
Cogeneración
0,2%0,6%
11,8% 0,0%
18,3%
39,5%
1,6%2,7%
25,1%
0,2%
Hidro de Pasada
Geotérmica
Eólica
Solar Térmica
Solar Fotovoltaica
Carbón
Diesel
Fuel-Oil
Gas Natural
Cogeneración
0,2%0,8% 1,5%
0,0% 2,0%
41,5%
2,2%3,6%
47,9%
0,3%
Hidro de Pasada
Geotérmica
Eólica
Solar Térmica
Solar Fotovoltaica
Carbón
Diesel
Fuel-Oil
Gas Natural
Cogeneración
0,3%0,0% 1,9% 0,0%
2,0%
43,8%
2,9%4,7%
44,1%
0,4%
F1, 2014 F1, 2025
F2, 2025 F3, 2025
6203 MW
7912 MW 6203 MW
18
Minimum cost,
operation and fault
Demand forecasting
Forecast fuel prices
legal constraints
Maintenance unit
programs
Medium-term operational planning
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
19
Optimization model for operational planning
T
t
N
i
ti
t
iPMt
iiti
ti uCPCuPC
1 1
)(),(min
TtuPP ti
n
i
ti
td ,..,1 , 0
1
TtNiPuPPu iti
tii
ti ,..,1y ,..,1 , maxmin
TtNiuT
uu
UPiTtk
tk
tiUP
i
ti
ti ,..,1 ;,..,1 ,
11
TtNiuT
uu
DWNiTtk
tk
tiDWN
i
ti
ti ,..,1 ;,..,1 ,
11 1
DWNi
oninii
ti
UPi
offinii
ti
tttu
tttu_
_
,..,1,0
,..,1,1
1,0tiu
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
20
• A more accurate estimate of the actual operating costs is required.
• A more accurate estimate of the energy price (marginal cost or spot prices) is required.
• The daily energy unavailability of the sun (plants PV) and wind (wind) makes this analysis even longer obligatory.
Why, Medium-term operational planning?
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
21
Energy generated
0
5.000
10.000
15.000
20.000
25.000
30.000
35.000
40.000
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Diesel
Fuel-Oil
Gas Natural
Carbón
Hidro de Pasada
Solar Térmica
Eólica
Cogeneración
Geotérmica
Solar Fotovoltaica
0
5.000
10.000
15.000
20.000
25.000
30.000
35.000
40.000
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Diesel
Fuel-Oil
Gas Natural
Carbón
Hidro de Pasada
Solar Térmica
Eólica
Cogeneración
Geotérmica
Solar Fotovoltaica
0
5.000
10.000
15.000
20.000
25.000
30.000
35.000
40.000
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Diesel
Fuel-Oil
Gas Natural
Carbón
Hidro de Pasada
Solar Termica
Eólica
Cogeneración
Geotérmica
Solar Fotovoltaica
F1 F2
F3
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
22
Energy generated for different future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2014
2014
2014
2014
2015
2015
2015
2015
2016
2016
2016
2016
2017
2017
2017
2017
2018
2018
2018
2019
2019
2019
2019
2020
2020
2020
2020
2021
2021
2021
2021
2022
2022
2022
2022
2023
2023
2023
2024
2024
2024
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Costo Marginal Semanal [USD/MWh]
Costo Marginal Semanal [USD/MWh]
F1; 80,5 USD/MWh aver.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2014
2014
2014
2014
2015
2015
2015
2015
2016
2016
2016
2016
2017
2017
2017
2017
2018
2018
2018
2019
2019
2019
2019
2020
2020
2020
2020
2021
2021
2021
2021
2022
2022
2022
2022
2023
2023
2023
2024
2024
2024
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Costo Marginal Semanal [USD/MWh]
Costo Marginal Semanal [USD/MWh]
F2; 91,5 USD/MWh aver.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2014
2014
2014
2014
2015
2015
2015
2015
2016
2016
2016
2016
2017
2017
2017
2017
2018
2018
2018
2019
2019
2019
2019
2020
2020
2020
2020
2021
2021
2021
2021
2022
2022
2022
2022
2023
2023
2023
2024
2024
2024
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Costo Marginal Semanal [USD/MWh]
Costo Marginal Semanal [USD/MWh]
F3; 79.0 USD/MWh aver.
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
23
Energy generated for different scenarios and not RO
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2015
2015
2015
2015
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2017
2017
2017
2017
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2019
2019
2019
2019
2020
2020
2020
2020
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2022
2022
2022
2022
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2024
2024
2024
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Costo Marg. Sem. [USD/MWh] Escenario Base Costo Marg. Sem. CTM· SIC. 2017
Costo Marg. Sem. Export. SADI 2016 Costo Marg. Sem. CTM3 SIC + Exp.SADI
Spot prices average 2014-2025
F180,51 USD/MWh
F1, S198,26 USD/MWh
F1, S281,36 USD/MWh
F1, S398,90 USD/MWh
F1
F1, S1 F1, S2 F1, S3
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2015
2015
2015
2015
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2017
2017
2017
2017
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2019
2019
2019
2019
2020
2020
2020
2020
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2022
2022
2022
2022
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2024
2024
2024
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Costo Marg. Sem. [USD/MWh] Escenario Base Costo Marg. Sem. CTM· SIC. 2017
Costo Marg. Sem. Export. SADI 2016 Costo Marg. Sem. CTM3 SIC + Exp.SADI
24
Energy generated for different scenarios with RO
Spot prices average 2014-2025
F291,55 USD/MWh
F2, S1120,67 USD/MWh
F2, S2100,98 USD/MWh
F2, S3140,25 USD/MWh
F2
F2, S1 F2, S2 F2, S3
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2015
2015
2015
2015
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2017
2017
2017
2017
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2019
2019
2019
2019
2020
2020
2020
2020
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2022
2022
2022
2022
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2024
2024
2024
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Costo Marg. Sem. [USD/MWh] Escenario Base Costo Marg. Sem. CTM· SIC. 2017
Costo Marg. Sem. Export. SADI 2016 Costo Marg. Sem. CTM3 SIC + Exp.SADI
25
Energy generated for different scenarios with cheap gas
Spot prices average 2014-2025
F279,02 USD/MWh
F2, S1106,75 USD/MWh
F2, S2104,32 USD/MWh
F2, S3161,81 USD/MWh
F3
F3, S1F3, S2
F3, S3
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
26
Energy generated for different scenarios with cheap gas
Esce
nario
Sin
Cuo
tas
ERN
C
(Bas
e C
arbó
n)
Con
Cuo
tas
ERN
C
(Exi
genc
ia
20/2
5)
Sin
Cuo
tas
ERN
C(B
ase
Gas
)
Sin
Cuo
tas
ERN
C(T
erm
osol
ar)
Plan
de
Obr
as
Indi
cativ
o C
NE
(201
3)
Plan
de
Obr
as
Indi
cativ
o C
NE
(201
4)
Costo de Inversión [millones. USD] 4.884 7.271 2.571 11.429 3.260 6.506Demanda Neta Máxima en [MW] 4.120 4.120 4.120 4.120 4.120 3.616Energía Consumida en [GWh] 288.564 288.564 288.564 288.564 288.564 263.480Participación de Diesel 0,00% 0,05% 0,03% 0,00% 0,01% 0,07%Participación de Fuel-Oil 0,01% 0,52% 0,28% 0,09% 0,09% 0,58%Participación de Gas Natural 12,34% 7,68% 15,41% 10,16% 8,92% 11,77%Participación de Carbón 82,75% 80,74% 79,48% 74,29% 85,62% 72,36%Participación de Hidro 0,55% 0,55% 0,55% 0,55% 0,55% 0,58%Participación de Solar PV 1,29% 3,69% 1,29% 1,29% 1,81% 8,27%Participación de Eólica 0,96% 4,85% 0,96% 0,96% 1,52% 2,22%Participación Termosolar 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 10,64% 0,00% 2,18%Participación de Geotermia 1,37% 1,27% 1,37% 1,37% 0,85% 1,30%Participación de Otros 0,64% 0,64% 0,64% 0,64% 0,64% 0,68%Energía No Suministrada 0,00% 0,01% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%Costo Marginal Promedio [USD/MWh] 80,51 91,55 79,02 74,72 80,09 89,37Costo Medio de Producción [USD/MWh] 38,01 35,64 37,84 33,62 38,02 37,38Costo de Operación [millones. USD] 10.970 10.285 10.920 9.704 10.972 9.848Costo de Inversiones y Operación 15.854 17.556 13.491 21.133 14.232 16.354
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
27
• The renewable obligation produces an increase in the investment cost, close to 48%.
• The spot price with RO is grader than without RO. It is produced by long minimum down time and minimum up time of coal unit of the SING.
• The removal of the CMT unit produces an increase in the spot price close to 20 USD/MWh.
• Interconnection with Argentina causes an increase in price close to 10 USD /MWh
Conclusions and Future works
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
28
Future Works• Study mechanisms to regulate interconnection• Development a dynamic model for generation
planning.• Including the uncertainty in the model• Include the expansion of the transmission
network in analysis• Include renewable law in operational planning
model• Include storage models unit commitment model.
Conclusions and Future works
Universidad de Antofagasta – 15th January 2014
Year 2015. New, Solar Energy PhD.
Universidad de Antofagasta – 18th December 2014
Thank You for you attention