682 26.5.2015.pdf
-
Upload
ahmedaziz12617 -
Category
Documents
-
view
273 -
download
1
Transcript of 682 26.5.2015.pdf
-
R info@ceTEL/Fax
A 2Revision
edceg.comx:33765192
26/5/2015Date
m2
RT
Eng.AmrFarouk
Originated
TSTRUC
Re
P
S
Ref.VFEngRad
d Rev
CTUREBeporting
ProjectSEXIST
SiteIDSiteArea
Clie
FSpecsV.Ramidwanviewed
180Offi
BACKANgNo.27
SubjectTING
D:682a:CAIRO
ent
Version1Dr.NagyElMahallawy
Authorized
cersBuildin
NALYSIS76
1314
119LAVF
ngElRemae
S
ANMARKPLUFReference
eaElHaram
US 276ConsulRefere
mGiza
6tantence
-
RT Structure Analysis Site ID: 682 VF Ref- RT-EX
TABLE OF CONTENTES
Introduction....3
Disclaimer.3
Objective Statement.3
Summary of The Study.3
REPORT BODY4
Data/Assumptions..4
The Structure..4
Analysis4
Design Recommendations5
Conclusion..5
Validation...5
Site Photos..6
Cad Drawings....7
Appendix 1Computer Design Output .15
-
RT Structure Analysis Site ID: 682 VF Ref- RT-EX
Introduction
Disclaimer
This report was prepared by CEDC Consultants in the course of performing work for LANDMARK-
PLUS. The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the Contractor,
and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does constitute an implied or
expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, Vodafone Egypt make no warranties
or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or
merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness ,or
accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or
referred to in this report. The Contractor & the Consultant make representation severally that
the use of any product, apparatus, process, method, or other information will not infringe
privately owned rights and will assume ability for any loss, injury, or damage resulting from, or
occurring in connection with, for their own part of the scope.
Objective
The main objective of the report is to present the results of poles evaluation carried out in order
to study the characteristics of a steel poles, where own weight of the poles, own weight of
equipment and wind loads are considered in the analysis for check the stresses in all elements of
three poles 6.00m due to Existing loads, future loads.
This Report Describes the Results of the Site Visit and Complete Structural investigation
Summary of the Study
Date of visit: 26-MAY -2015
Engineer Name: Michael Samir
-
RT Structure Analysis Site ID: 682 VF Ref- RT-EX
Report Body
Data/Assumptions [Design Criteria ]
o Structural analysis model was carried out using STAAD PRO 2008 /Auto CAD 2015.
o All input data and output results of the analysis as shown in Appendix l.
o The poles is checked on:
Poles wind forces are calculated in accordance to ANSI-TIA-222-G-2009.
Basic wind speed is 120km/h
Operation wind speed is 90 km/h
Maximum allowable tilt and twist = 0.50 at 90 km/hr. for poles
Topographic Category will be (1)
Structure class will be (2)
Exposure category will be (C)
Steel Grade relevant the design code standards.
The Structure
o The structure was found 3 steel poles 6.00m on existing penthouse.
o Penthouse is bearing wall structure
Analysis
The existing structure supporting elements are analyzed under the poles loads. The poles design load
cases are considered in the analyses, with the possibility of extra cases to simulate different wind
load directions in different cases 0, 45, 90, and 135, to 315 degree. The resulted bending moments
and shear forces, to satisfy ANSI-TIA-222-G-2009 specifications, as shown in Appendix I, which
includes all of the structural analyses and the design outputs.
-
RT Structure Analysis Site ID: 682 VF Ref- RT-EX
Poles existing loads:
POLE (1) (6.00m Height )
Existing loads:
1 Antenna @ 3.50m from the bottom of Antenna. 1 Antenna @ 5.00m from the bottom of Antenna. 2RRU@ 3.00m from the bottom of RRU. 1 MW Dish 0.3 m@ 4.40m 1 MW Dish 0.3 m@ 5.50m
POLE 2 (6.00m Height)
Existing loads:
1 Antenna @ 3.50m from the bottom of Antenna. 1RRU@ 2.30m from the bottom of RRU. 1RRU@ 2.50m from the bottom of RRU. 1 MW Dish 0.3 m@ 3.90m 1 MW Dish 0.3 m@ 5.50m
POLE 3 (6.00m Height)
Existing loads:
1 Antenna @ 3.00m from the bottom of Antenna. 1RRU@ 2.30m from the bottom of RRU. 1RRU@ 2.50m from the bottom of RRU.
-
RT Structure Analysis Site ID: 682 VF Ref- RT-EX
Conclusion:-
Based on the site visit and the detailed analysis for the existing tower and steel grillage:
The penthouse is unsafe under existing poles loads due to the following reasons: - There is separation between penthouse slab and walls.
- Penthouse Slab thickness is smaller than 10 cm.
- There are diagonal, horizontal and vertical cracks in the penthouse walls.
-
RT Structure Analysis Site ID: 682 VF Ref- RT-EX
Site Photos
-
RT Structure Analysis Site ID: 682 VF Ref- RT-EX
Penthouse slab thickness is smaller than 10 cm
Diagonal, horizontal and vertical cracks in penthouse walls
-
RT Structure Analysis Site ID: 682 VF Ref- RT-EX
Separation between penthouse slab walls
-
RT Structure Analysis Site ID: 682 VF Ref- RT-EX
Diagonal, horizontal and vertical cracks in penthouse walls
-
RT Structure Analysis Site ID: 682 VF Ref- RT-EX
Separation between penthouse slab walls