6.4.4 designs case-crossover

9
Designs Case-crossover design When investigating an intermittent exposure with immediate and transient effect on risk related to an abrupt outcome All cases are incident occurrences of the disease of interest Cases at another time (or other times) serve as their own controls

Transcript of 6.4.4 designs case-crossover

Page 1: 6.4.4 designs case-crossover

Designs• Case-crossover design

– When investigating an intermittent exposure with immediate and transient effect on risk related to an abrupt outcome

– All cases are incident occurrences of the disease of interest

– Cases at another time (or other times) serve as their own controls

Page 2: 6.4.4 designs case-crossover

Designs• Case-crossover design

– Developed in 1988 due to concerns about ability to find controls representing the study base for a study of causes of MI peaks in the morning

– Realized could compare each patient’s experience on their MI day with their experience the day before (or multiple control days before)

Page 3: 6.4.4 designs case-crossover

Designs• Case-crossover design

– Analogous to the experimental cross-over design except that the data are:• Non-experimental• Observed retrospectively

Page 4: 6.4.4 designs case-crossover

Designs• Case-crossover design

– Publicized in 1997 with media coverage of an analysis showing that car phone calls were associated with increased risk of collision

Page 5: 6.4.4 designs case-crossover

Designs

Page 6: 6.4.4 designs case-crossover

Designs• Case-crossover design

– For each case, can sample:• One control time• Multiple control times• Sample of the person-time over a defined period

Page 7: 6.4.4 designs case-crossover

Designs• Case-crossover design

– Trends in time (e.g., seasonality) are main challenge specific to this design

Page 8: 6.4.4 designs case-crossover

Case crossover example• Valent et al. A case-crossover study of sleep and childhood injury. Ped 2001;107: E23

• Research question• Does lack of sleep result in a greater number of unintentional childhood

injuries?• Exposure = sleep <10 hours (EXP +) vs. >= 10 hours (EXP -)• Outcome = Childhood unintentional injury

• Study population = 292 children with unintentional injuries• Sleep time data collected for two periods (0-24 hours before injury) and (25-48

hours before injury)• “Case period” = 24 hour period before injury; “Control period” = 25-48 hour period

before injury• Note that each child has both one case and one control period...these two

periods together form a pair• Analysis is done through a matched analysis in which the time periods (case and

control periods) are matched• Four possible scenarios

• a. Case period = (EXP +) and Control period = (EXP +)...”concordant”• b. Case period = (EXP +) and Control period = (EXP -)...”discordant”• c. Case period = (EXP -) and Control period = (EXP +)...”discordant”• d. Case period = (EXP -) and Control period = (EXP -)...”concordant”

• Concordant pairs offer no “information” about the effect of sleep < 10 hours (EXP +) vs. sleep > 10 hours (EXP -)

Page 9: 6.4.4 designs case-crossover