6 bowling green ksa presentation
-
Upload
guest7dbf4 -
Category
Documents
-
view
585 -
download
3
description
Transcript of 6 bowling green ksa presentation
City of Bowling Green
Implementation of MCM 5
Post Construction
Matt Powell
Agenda
History -Regulatory Background Goals Program Development Documentation New BMPs
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Bowling Green’s SW Goals
1. Improve the quality of Bowling Green and Warren County’s water resources by: Implementing minimum control measures Providing education to citizens
2. Provide protection of the short-term and long-term public health, safety, and general welfare by: Protecting, and preserving storm water quality and
fish and wildlife habitat within Bowling Green. Protecting those downstream from stormwater quality
impairment.
Defining the Program
Determine Pollutant of Concern (POC) Establish Pollutant Load Reduction Develop design requirements that
encourage green infrastructure Provide a selection of appropriate
BMPs
Maximum Extent Practicable
To what degree must we implement this minimum control measure and achieve both compliance and unhindered growth and development?
Establishment of a second trigger; 10,000ft2
Hot Spot Landuses
Pretreatment required for following landuses:
1. Automotive Fueling Facilities
2. Automotive Repair Facilities
3. Restaurants with grease collection and disposal
4. Other landuses as determined to have a high potential of pollutant discharge into the MS4 as determined by the City Engineer
Typically, oil grease separators, hydrodynamic separators, etc.
Conservation Subdivision
WQMP = Clearly defined clearing limits Total impervious surfaces for development
cannot exceed 15% Minimum lot sizes – 1 acre Disconnected roof drains Stabilized sinkhole basins
No additional WQ treatment required
Sediment or total suspended solids (TSS) Available BMP research Many other programs using TSS as pollutant of
concern Old KYR100000– references 80% TSS
reduction Indicator pollutant EPA has stated sediment is no. 1 reason for
stream impairment
Pollutant of Concern
The Presumptive Program
The design is as described in BMP Manual
+
The installation is per the approved plans
+The BMP is maintained per the Operation &
Maintenance Plan
=
Compliance.
No Performance testing for preapproved BMPs
Steps Taken to Date:
Ordinance with post construction language BMP storm water stakeholder group BMP Manual revised Ordinance revised Developed plan review and permitting
processes Training
Never Again
Effective date = April 1 2008 If plan has been platted and has approved
SWMP, no additional storm water quality treatment required.(The Grandfather Clause)
DOCUMENTATION
Asbuilt Certification
Need to verify That BMP was installed per
approved plans That WQv treatment goals
being met Engineer and surveyor Asbuilt must be approved
before: Bonds released (S/D) CO issued (non-S/D)
O&M Plan
Includes the following: BMP Maintenance Agreement
Privately owned BMPs only BMP location map BMP schematics BMP maintenance and inspection templates Annual BMP report template
Recorded with the deed Privately owned BMPs only
O&M PlanThe Landings
- Agreement- Location map- Schematics
- Inspection checklists
Maintenance
City to maintain BMPs in residential areas on public ROWs
Landowner to maintain all other BMPs All BMPs
O&M Plan Routine inspections Annual inspection certification
A Tale of 2 Methods
Volume Based BMPs Calculation WQv = [(P Rv)(A)]/12
Where, WQv is the water quality treatment volume (ac-ft) P is the average rainfall in inches, (in the case of
Bowling Green, is 1.1 inches); Rv is the volumetric runoff coefficient, which is: Rv = 0.05 + 0.009(I), where I is the percent
impervious cover; and A is the area in acres
Manufactured BMPs
Treatment mechanisms different from non-manufactured BMPs
Must provide 3rd party testing to verify pollutant removal to get approved for use (TARP, NJCAT)
Nashville’s list of approved BMPs and reduction capabilities is automatically approved
Method 2
Rate Based BMPs Method Qp=C I A Where Qp=unit peak flow in cfs C=runoff coefficient I=intensity, 2.45 inch per hour A=contributing area in acres Automatic 50% credit
Modification of Rate Based Method Rate Based BMPs Method Use of TR55 to determine Tc Using synthetic storm curve Tc is used to
determine I I declines as Tc increases, thus encouraging
green space by reducing the size of the unit required.
Treatment Train
When one BMP discharges into another Discharge from upstream BMP will be “clean” so
downstream BMP TSS reduction will be less effective
Bioretention80% TSS
Dry Detention60% TSSFlow Flow
TSS reduction = 80+60 – (80x60)/100 = 92%
100
)( BABATSStrain
BMP SELECTION
Ponds
Dry ponds Outlet
structure Dry storage
area 60% TSS
reduction
Ponds
Wet ponds Outlet
structure Permanent
pool 80% TSS
reduction
Ponds
Variations Micropool Extended detention Multiple ponds Pocket ponds
Wetlands
Outlet structure Shallow wet
treatment area Upland dry storage Plants are key Length of flow
(residence time) key 75% TSS reduction
Bioretention areas
Outlet structure Small storm & large
storms Dry treatment area
Depressed planting area
Specific soils Under drain
80% TSS reduction
Open Channel Systems
Simple outlet system
Treatment area Dry
good in most all land use applications
Underdrain system Wet
Not well accepted in residential
Long wetland
Sand filters
Many variations Best suited for non-
residential Typically underground Must receive drainage
from only impervious surfaces
Infiltration trenches
Limited application due to karst topography