5+Mm Implants vs Bone Augmentation Poster Sio 2010
of 1
-
Upload
megagen-implant -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of 5+Mm Implants vs Bone Augmentation Poster Sio 2010
-
8/9/2019 5+Mm Implants vs Bone Augmentation Poster Sio 2010
1/1
5 mm Short Implants Versus Bone Augmentation.
Four-month Post-loading Results From A Randomized
Controlled Clinical Trial.L. Piana *, R. Pistilli**, P. Felice* , L. Checchi*, A. Scarano***, M. Esposito****
[email protected][email protected]@[email protected] [email protected]@hotmail.com
*School of Dentistry, Unit of Periodontology&Implantology, University of Bologna, Italy
** Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, A.C.O. San Filippo Neri, Roma, Italy
**** School of Dentistry, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Manchester, UK
onclusions: With residual bone height of 5-7 mm over the mandibular canal, 5 mm short implants might be preferable since the treatment is faster,heaper and associated with less morbidity. In the presence of 4-6 mm of bone height below the maxillary sinus it is still unclear which procedure could
e preferable.
ferences:- Felice P, Marchetti C, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Pellegrino G, Esposito M. Vertical augmentation of the posterior mandible with inlay grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine bone. Results up to 1 year after loading from a
randomized controlledclinicaltrial.ClinicalOral ImplantsResearch2009;In press
elice P, Cannizzaro G, Checchi V, Marchetti C, Pellegrino G, Censi P, Esposito M. Vertical bone augmentation versus 7-mm-long implants in posterior atrophic mandibles. Results of a randomised controlled clinical trial of up to 4 month
safterloading. Eur.J OralImplantol. 2009;2(1):7-20.
- Pietro Felice, Vittorio Checchi, Roberto Pistilli,Antonio Scarano, Gerardo Pellegrino, MarcoEspositoBone augmentation versus 5-mmdentalimplants in posterioratrophicjaws. One-Year post-loading results froma randomised
controlled clinicaltrial. European Journal of OralImplantology2009;2(4)267281
- Felice P, MarchettiC, Piattelli A, Pellegrino G, ChecchiV, WorthingtonH, Esposito M. Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posteriormandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from theiliac crest versus bovine an organic
bone.Results up to delivery of the finalprostheses from a split-mouth, randomised, controlledtrial. Eur.J. OralImplantol.2008;1(3):193-1198.
Objectives: to evaluate whether 5 mm short implants could be a suitable alternative to augmentation and placement of longer implants in posterior
atrophic jaws
Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with bilateral posterior edentulism
were included: 15 patients having 5-7 mm of residual crestal height above the
mandibular canal and 15 patients having 4-6 mm of residual crestal height
below the maxillary sinus were randomized either to receive 5 mm or 10 mm
ong Rescue implants (Megagen) placed in augmented bone according to a
plit-mouth design.Outcome measures were: prosthesis and implant failures, complications, time
needed to fully recover mental nerve function and patient treatment
preference.
Results
In 5 patients of the augmented group there was not enough bone(height) to place 10 mm implants and therefore 7 and 8.5 mm were used.
In each group one prosthesis could not be placed because an implant was found mobile at abutment connection.
Five complications occurred: 2 in the augmented group versus 3 in the 5 mm implant group. No patient suffered from permanent disruption
of alveolar inferior nerve function; however sensitivity was recovered significantly faster in the short implant side. There was no statistically
significant difference in patient preference for treatment.
*** Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara,Chieti, Italy
Test side in posterior maxillaryControl side in posterior maxillary
Test side in posterior mandible
Control side in posterior mandible
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
