341

159.953.5

37.015.3

DOI:10.5937/ZRFFP44-5763

. 1

,

2

: - .

-

1908. , jer -

-

. :

. :

, , , , -

. , -

, -

. , -

(50 ) , (20 ).

(-

) ( ).

1975/76. .

. -

. : 1) -

F(1,102)=5,240,p

LIV (3)/2014

342 .

F(1,102)=27,767, p

. 343

5E U5, E 5EE, 5 B E 5U 2UU -2E, E U5, E , 5B E 2U EE (, 2010, E. 116). 2 B 5 5E -

E U54:

5 2 2B E B-, 2 E 5 25E - B 2U 2B 2. 5BE 2U E 5 2 5E 2 E. 2 E U 5, 2 2B 2 2U 2B 2 2 5E . B 2 5E U2 2 5 , 2 B 2U 2B 2, B E 2 2B . U , 5E 2 2 5-E E EE EU , B E 2 B 52E 5EU -E 5B B 5E 5U- . U 5 5E2 E5E EU E E E(Judd, 1939, E. 509).

2 5E5E 2 2 2 E, , B E , E 5 2, E 2 2 B E . , U B , 2 5E UEE 52U, U E2 E 2 E2.

5 E2 E E B 2 E6 5EU 55 5BE 2U E E 55 (-E, 2006, E. 500).

2 EU E 2 5E 52E 5 E U, 2 5E -

4 EE 5E 25U 2 E: 5 5-5 5 EE U E 2.

5 5: 2 5E BE U E ,E 2 U5 5 5BE U . E B 5 U E 5E 5E2E BE U .

6 E EE 5B , E - 5BU U 5EU.

LIV (3)/2014

344 .

27 BE 5 (5: , 2010) 52E 2- E E 55. , 55 5E, , U 5E5B 5B E. 5-E 2 E 5E 5EU E -E2 55 , U5 2B E EB E 2 B 2 E BU 2 2U 5E U5 E E , 5E E U5 B . :

B 5E E2 (5. 5 U, , U-, 2 E 2.) 2 E 2 EE - 5 2U 5B, E2 B (, 2013, E. 85).

2 5E E 5E E E U- E 25 2 U E 5E 2 5BU 52U 5. E 5E 5 2 22EU -5 E B E E : E 2-U E (Ferguson, 1956), UE EE (Bruner, 1976 & Bruner, 1976B) 5B 5 E 5U, 52 UEU (, 2006).

2 5B 2 E 2U 5-E E B 5E BE E-U EU (2 E).

7 2 5 2 U5 5E 2B 2 5- E B U E 5EE, - EB E, 5EE E2 5U , 2 5 EU5 5EU B 5, 5 E U5 E B U B , 5-E U5 E B U 5E., 2 5 5E E2 5U ,5 55 E 5.

. 345

5, 52 E E- BE EU EU 5E E E EU . 22 (Edwards, 2010) E EE EEE U U 5E, 2 5EE, E 2E, 2 E E 5 2 5EE 52 2U EU 2E 5B -B E 55 5 E E. Schmidt & Wrisberg (2008) 5 E E 22 2 E E5 E . E (2012) E 2 E 5 BE E 5 2 5BE 52 2 2 2 E2E. E E 2 2- 5 EU . EE E - U EE E 2 E(EE 2 5E ), ( 5, B 2, 5 5EB5 ), EE (E, ,EE, 55E .).

B 5E E BEEU 2 2 E 52 E- . E 2 E 2E E ( B ) 5 5E 2 E B B E E 2 2 E . E 2E E, 5E E -, U 2 (Thorndike, 1914). E 5E-5 U2 (Osgoode, 1949) E E 2 2E BE 2E, BE 52E 5 E 2U 52-E. 2 5E2 5E 52E E 2U 52E 2 E EB E. 5E EBrandsford i sar. 1979 (5 E, 2012) BE E. E 52U 5. E E EEU 5E E U U 5E. E 5E E- 5E5E E UEU 5 5. E E 2 5E 5E E 5B. E

LIV (3)/2014

346 .

E UE 5, B B -E E, B E5 E . B52 2 E, Smeeton, Ward i Williams (2004) 5E 2 E- E E E E E52U 5 E E 5E:2B, 2B. E 2 525 E E 2 2-E E . 22 (Edwards, 2010)E EU E B 2UEU 2UU E B2U EU EU EU -, 2U E. 2 E 2U U EU 2U, 5 - 5EU .

2 5E, 5E E U- E 5B 5E--B E E. 5, E U- E 5 E E 2 U , E2 E . 2 E 2 5E, Ua- , 55, 5, E E2 E , 2, EE (UE UE) E- E 2E, 5E 22 2 EU EU E8, 2 5U 5EU E9,E E 5. 2 5E 5B2E 2 5E E 2E55 5EU E E , , E

8 (1965) E 5 E E E. -E E 5E 5BE 2 5B U 2U 25. 2EU E UE 2U 5E 22 5 5B B EBE . 2 EU E 2 2 5 B2E 5BE 52 E U 2 5B-E E 5 U 52BE .

. 347

5E , E E . , 5- 2E B E, 5B , EUE E 2 (E E) 2 5- E EE 5 2 5-E E U E, 5 E 2E.

,

5 E (E 5E-)

E 2 E, E E2 2 U 5 . , 5E E 5 5-5 E, E , 55 -, 52 . 5 E- 5 E 5. E- 5 52 2 EE 52 2 .10

5E 52U 5. 5. 2 5E , 5 5E 2- 2EEU 5E 22EU , 5 2. 2 5E 52E U2 22EU 5 2 E 2 2 (Hendrickson &Schroeder 1941) E 5-E2 2U 5E, 2 - E 5 EE B 5EE. EU, 5 2 E B 2 E 2 2U E 2 2 UU ,

9 5E 5 E EEE E B , 5E () E, E 2 5 E 5UE EEU, E2 E . , BE 5- 2 52E E EB 2 B2 22 2 5U .

10 E, . (1970) 5E BE 5E, -U, B. III/2, E. 202.

LIV (3)/2014

348 .

5 E. B E 2 EE 22U E 5B.E U E E B E E E- B 5 5E U5. 2UE, E 22 E U-5 U 2 5 5E E5 5B U- E, EE 2U E - E 55 B E. , , EE BE 5, , E 5E 5-5 .

B 2 2 5E 52 , 52E U E 5 2 - 55. 5 2 5-E 5E BE 2E 2 U- 52 2 2B 2 50 20 . 5 E 5. 2 2 2 U5: 5E E. 5E 2B 5B 2 B 55 5 EE,2 E U5 2B E E B. 5E U5 2 5 2 E 5- EE 5E E E U 2 E 5 5 2B. 5EB 55 5 EE 2 52 U5 5 U E 2 2 5E B ( 2U 5E) 5 U E 5 5 2B 2. 2 -E 13-U2 2 2 E- 2 2 2, 2 E-E 2 14 U2. , 2 5E 5E E2 E-, E BE 2 E 5e 2E 5-B E.

E, 5B U 5E 5E E- 2E 5B B BE 55 5- EE U 2. E 5B 5B 2U 5E - 52 E 52U 2U 5E E 5. 2 5E (B) U5 5EU B 5 U-

. 349

E 5 5 2B 2. , 5211 U5 U 2.

,

5E 5 2 5 U-5 BE. B U5 5 U E 2, 5E 5E U5 B 55 5EE, 2 2 U E 5 52B 2. 5E 2 B: ) -: 5 55 5 EE B) -: U E 52 2. 5 5 EE2 U, 5 5 2- 5 5 EE E 5E 2. B EE BE 5 5 5 (, 1971). E 52 2 2 5BE 5 U 2. - B 5E B U, 2, 5- E. 5E B E B, 5 2 U5. : 1) E B (B U5 U 2, 5U -2U E 2 14 U2); 2) 5 (B U5 EB 2 2); 3) -E 2 (B U5 2 U2 ) 4) 5BEU E 2. B 5E - 5 E U5 5 2 5E E U5 EE-E : F(1,102)=0,01213, p>0.05.

5E E U5 -E U 1. U 2E - 5 2 5E 2 U5 B 2 5 5BE U 2.

11 5E 52 5 - B U BE U5 5 U 2 2B 2.

LIV (3)/2014

350 .

B 5E U5 E 55 o 5- EE. B 52E E 5 5EE. B B 2 5E E- 2 BE 55 2 E 55, 5E U2, 5E 2E- E 5E E. BE 5-E B 2 55 :) 5 EE 2 U 5 2 2 E 5E UE; B) 2 5-E 5 5E 2 5E U2 52 U 2 5U U; ) 2 E- 5 5E U 2 5E -

1: ( 95% )

. 351

2 52 U 2 5U; 2) 52 5 2U 5E UE 5 ;) BE 2 5E 2 5 EE, EE , 5 EE 5, 5. 2 2 U2: ) U2 - 2; B) U2 2 E5 , 5-E, U2 2 5 2; ) U2 2 -U 2 2 5E E E 2B U; U) U2 5 EE 5 5. U2 5B 5-2 5 52E 2. , U2 U5 2 5 5E 5B 5. E 55 B 2 BE 2 60%5 EE . B2 E 9 . B B E 5EB. 5U U2 EE .5E U5 EE 5 E B2 5-5 5 EE. E E U 2 5- U E 2 2 2 2 5-E U5 2 55 5 EE. 2E 5E2U 5 EE -E U5 EE E EE . EE B 5E 2 B BU E-E BE E U5 5 EE E B, , 2 EE U E 2. EE 5E U5 78,72% 2 55 5 EE, E U5 13,65%, E 5- 2 U5 B - BE (df = 51, Dm = 19,49, p < .01). U E 2 B 5E U5 B -5.

,

E 5 2 104 5E. 5E U5 B 52 E 81 82 2. 2- B 5 59 , BU 2E 52BE E B 52. E U5 U 2 E B2 U. 2 B 5 72 .

LIV (3)/2014

352 .

2 U5, 5 U 5 U E 2, B 52.

E 2 U 10 EU 1 . E B 5- 2 5 E 5 5 B 5- 2 52 U 2 30 E5. B 2 5E E, E E 2B -2 E. E B, 5E E, 2 B5E 2 BE EB 2 E 52- 2 E 2B 2 50 52 2. EU B E 22E 5 2 EBE 2 E 2B 2 20 . E 5B E 5, E 5, 2-U B. 5, B 2 2E, E , 2U 5 2 - 5 2. 5 75 . U -E 2, 2 2 U5, 5- E 5EU E (52), E E EU B E U 2, E E 2 - U B 1,5 . B (5- 55 5 EE) EE 20 5E 2 2 BE B U5 5 E 5 EE.

B2 52E : EEE 25 (2, 1968).

U E 5 2B (50 52 2 ) BE5E U5 5 5 8,846 U 2 BE E U5 9,384 U , 2 2E U5 5E 2 0,538 U. - : F(1,102) = 5,24, p< 0.05 U 2 5 2 - 5E E U5 5E E 5E U5 5 U 2 5 2B EEE .

. 353

E E 5E U5 2B B 55 5 EE, E 5E5E 2 B5 5E U5 EE E B.

U E 5 2B (20 52 - 2) 5 BE 5E U5 55,75 U, BE E U5 7,50 U. 2 2 2E U5 5E 2 1,75 U-.

2: ( 95% )

LIV (3)/2014

354 .

: F(1,102)=27,767, p

. 355

5E 2 2 2 E 5 55 5 EE U E 2. , 52 B 52E 52 U5 . : F(1,102)=9,530, p< 0.01 U 4 5 2 U5 5E 5U2 52 U5 U 2.

, E E 2 E 2 UE E E 5 55 5 EE U 2. , U2 2 B 55- 5 EE 25 2 BE B- U5 5 5 1,391 U 2 E U5 U E 5 2B 2.

5E2 2 2 5EU5 U E 5 2B 2 B B,

4: ( 95% )

LIV (3)/2014

356 .

5 2B E B B ,E 52 U E 22 E U5. B 2 U5, 5 5-E 5E, 5 U E 2 B 2,2 B 5E 5E U5 B B 55- 5 EE, U U 2 2 B5 ( ) -U5 EE 5 EU E, 2- B. E B BE 5E U5 E 55 5 EE. 5E U 5E 5 E, E E 5 2 E - E. E 2, U E 2 5 5 2B 5B B, 25- 2 BE 5E U5 25E 52 5 E 2; 2 2 2B 2 52U 5 E, 2 B5 5 E, 2 E E 5 - 5B E. BE U5 B -B , B 5E 52U5 E B E E 5E 22E5 2 E. BU EU E 5 E 5- EE U B 5U2E E-: U E 5 2B 5B U E 5- 2B, E , EU, 5EU B 5. U2,2U2 E (5 55 5EE) 5 U 2. , 5 Ausubelu(1968) E E 5E 2 U2 5E UE- EE 5 UE , - 2 EU 2 E 5E 5-B. B UE EE 2 E U E U 2E BE 5 U B2 5EU.

5E E, EE 5E 5 2 -E U5 ( E B) 5 B 5 U 5 2B 2. E?, 5E 2 5E2 E U 5E -UE 2 E E , 2 E. E B E EE E . 5 E E 22 5EE B E . , 5 22 (Edwards, 2010) E-

. 357

EU E B 2U E-U 2UU E B 2UEU EU EU , 2U E. 5E B5 E U5 U E 52B 2 2 5 5 2B EE E- E U E 5 2B 2. , 5- 5U U BE 5 52 5-B E, E E 2 5, 5E,5 2B E 2 B , E E 5U 2 B2 5 U 52B 2. E5E 2 2 U5 2U2E E , 5 U, E 52, U- E 5 2B 5 U E 52B, U2 E. E E2 2 5E U5. , B 5 5E U5 5 5 2B- 2 5B 5 U 5- 2B U EE E B 55 5 EE.

2U E, 52 5EE 5E E E E BE E 5 U -E . , 52, 5E5EE E- 2E EU E 5 U 2. E 2 E, 5, 5 5-E, 2E (U). E5E 2 B-E B U5 2 E U -2 U 2 E. GentnerDedre 2000 (5 Sternberg, 2003) E2 2 U - 5B 5 2 5B, 2 E EBE 2 5B . U -, E 2 U E 2 B EE E2. 2 2 E EE E 2,E UE 2 52, EE B(EE 2) 5 5 (Sternberg, 2003:384). ,5E, E BU E 2 2 -U E U2 . 2 E U, EGentner, BE U 2 2 2 5 5, 52 EBE.

LIV (3)/2014

358 .

5E U E(U 2, U 5 2B 2 U 5 2B 2) E 2 E E B E 2U2 2 E 2 5E U5.

5 2 U 5-E 2 2 2U :

) 5 U E 5 2B 2 2 2 BE B U5 5 E 5. E, E-E U 5E 5 E B 5 5E U5. B 2 -2 5E E 2, - E B E5 2 2-, , 2, 52E 5 5E- E. EU, EU E E 2 2 B -2 E ( B 5E2 2) BE 2 E2 E 5E2 EBE U . , E 2 U5 5E B U5 E E U E E B 2 U 5 2B 2. E E E EB 2E B U5, EU U- 55E B 5 B - 5E U5 5B E- 5 B U5 55 5EE.

B) 5 U E 5 2B 2 2 2- 2 BE E U5 5EU B 52 BE E U5, E 5E -5E 5E 2 2(Hendrickson & Schroeder, 1941). , 5 B 5U BE 5E U5 2 B25E2 E, 2 5 E E E 2 52 5- E E5 52E 2B 2. 55 5 EE 5E U5 E U E 5 2B 5B E (U E 5 2B 2). 5E E, BE -E U5 E E.

. 359

E 5U 2 E-. 2 E E E 5-5 5 EE E EU U 2 E E 5 E E.

, 5B E 2 E (55 5 EE) 25- EE EU E BE U . B 25 BE E 5B-E B 5, 5E EE U 2(5B 5 2B 2).

Ausubel, P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt &Rinehart & Winston.

Bruner, J. (1976). B. , 2/3, E. 273371.

Bruner, J. (1976B). E 5 B. , 4,E. 443455.

, . (1971). $ .U2: 2 B E 2E.

, . (1975). , (, ). U2: .

2, . . (1968). , , $$$. U2: 2E.

, . (1971). 2 EE . , 3,185196.

, . (2013). 1. 2: 5 5 2 E2 2 E.

Judd, C.H. (1939). Educational Psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Mileti, . (2012). Motoriko uenje u funkciji intenzifikacije procesavjebanja. U: Findak, V. (ur.) Zbornik radova 12. ljetne kola kineziologaRepublike Hrvatske Metode rada u podruju edukacije, sporta i sportske rekreacije(str. 5663). Rovinj, Zagreb: Hrvatski kinezioloki savez.

Marton, F. (2006). Sameness and Difference in Transfer. The Journal of Thelearning Sciences, 15 (4). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

E 5 5U VIII 2 U2 .

, . (2000). 55E 5BE . : EE .

LIV (3)/2014

360 .

, . (2006). $ , , $,1$ . : EE .

, . (2011). E E E E E- U B. , LXV (1), E. 7790.

Osgoode, C. E. (1949). The similarity paradox in human learning. Psycholog-ical review, 56, p. 132 143.

2, . (1959). . U2: 2 5E . . B.

Schmidt, R. A, & Wrisberg, A. C. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A prob-lem-based learning approach [4th ed.]. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Smeeton, N. J., Ward, P. & Williams, . . (2004). Do pattern recognitionskills transfer across sports? A preliminary analysis. Journal of Sport Sciences,22, p. 205214.

E, . (1970). ,. U2: 2 B E 2E.

E, . (1970B). 5E BE 5E. -, 23.

Sternberg, R. (2003). Cognitive Psychology. Boston: Thomson Learning.

Thorndike, E. L. (1914). Educational psychology. New York: Columbia.

Ferguson, G. (1956). On Transfer and the Abilities of Man. Canadian Journalof Psychology, Vol 10(3), p. 121131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0083676.

(B ) (1975). U2: 2 B- B E .. B.

Hendrichson, G., & Schroeder, W. (1941). Transfer of Training in Learning toHit a Submerged Target. American Journal of Educational Psychology, 32,p. 205213.

. 361

BLAGOJE V. NEIUNIVERSITY OF PRITINA WITH TEMPORARY HEAD-OFFICEIN KOSOVSKA MITROVICA, FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY

SUMMARY TRANSFER EFFECTS ON TRAINING THE REFRACTION OF LIGHT WHEN HITTING THE TARGET IN THE WATER

This paper represents experimental research of the effects of train-ing students in the principles of light refraction to succeed in hittingthe target in the water. The aim of this experiment was to investigatethe veracity of the conclusions reached by Judd in 1908, since thisexperiment has been crucial in educational psychology - it representsthe experimental basis of the generalized theory of transfers. Namely,Judd demonstrated that general experience (not identical elements)is transferred in the process of transfer. There were two groups in theresearch: the experimental and control group. The following varia-bles were controlled: hitting the target in the air; the knowledge ofthe refraction of light, age, gender and number. Unlike the controlgroup, the experimental group received training in the principles oflight reflection. Having completed the training of the experimentalgroup, the hitting of the target in the water was performed, firstly atthe depth of 50 cm and then at the depth of 20 cm. The sampleincluded two classes of eighth - grade students from the elementaryschool in Peenjevac (the experimental group) and Razgojna (the con-trol group). The research was conducted at the beginning of theschool year (1975/76). In the process, they used errors in hitting thetarget For the processing of data, the analyses of variance and meas-ures of statistical descriptions have shown the following: 1) thesuccess of the experimental group in shooting targets at the firstdepth of water is significantly better than the success of the controlgroup F (1,102) = 5.240 , p