??

M

StaceyBell & Newby

?

()

?

:

?

2070

Ex:

Ex:

:

:1.1986 2. 3.

1970 :

(La Rioja): MVRDV GRAS Logroo

: 1. 2.

2070

1. 2.(ex.) 3. 4. 5.

?

?

?

?

? ?

?123456789101112: 123456 7

?

?

TEBSCo

Free-market Environmentalism

(Free-market environmentalism is a position that argues that the free market, property rights, and tort law provide the best tools to preserve the health and sustainability of the environment. This is in contrast to the most common modern approach of proactive environmental legislation.)

(In economics, a market failure exists when the production or use of goods and services by the market is not efficient. That is, there exists another outcome where market participants' overall gains from the new outcome outweigh their losses (even if some participants lose under the new arrangement). Market failures can be viewed as scenarios where individuals' pursuit of pure self-interest leads to results that are not efficient that can be improved upon from the societal point-of-view. The first known use of the term by economists was in 1958, but the concept has been traced back to the Victorian philosopher Henry Sidgwick )

Robin Hahnel:overexploitation of common property resourcesoverpollutiontoo little pollution cleanup overconsumption.

BaumolBlinder

(accountibility)

(Pareto Optimum)()

1970

?PVC

Tort law, based as it is on the protection of individual rights and the need to prove specific injury, has not been a significant means of preventing environmental degradation.

Sue Elworth Jane Holder...

---

(tragedy of commons)Elinor Ostrom

Anarcho-primitivism

What is Anarcho-primitivism ?

John Moore

??

?

The industrial way of life leads to the industrial way of death. From Shiloh to Dachau, from Antietam to Stalingrad, from Hiroshima to Vietnam and Afghanistan, the great specialty of industry and technology has been the mass production of human corpses.

(Population)(Hypocrisy)(Civilization and violence)(Practicality)(Mass society)(The critique of language)

65HypocrisyDerrick Jensen:

John Zerzan

Mark Lance

(Feminism)

Alison Jaggar

9-1(gender-neutral)

Okin,197:200

(difference approach)

Ex:

Ex:

Ex:

Radcliffe-Richards,1980:113-14

VS

(dominance approach)

Ex:

233200369.721.37.4

2003

2004157531-35%2000

932004820057

98.4%

75%

200437,10447,83678%

2004

1564286754.7228.7315.49

15-64

2004102,85020037,768

28.7%23426% 257.8%20043218.2%20021732.7%10 22.7%

004377200018.9%2004 7228.6%200415320%13.7 19315.8%4229.1% 1.2

?

---

?------""

***********************************************