エビデンス・データの�研究マネジメントへの活用に向けて

Click here to load reader

  • date post

    06-Aug-2015
  • Category

    Science

  • view

    78
  • download

    1

Embed Size (px)

Transcript of エビデンス・データの�研究マネジメントへの活用に向けて

1. 2015624 1 2. 1. 2. () 3. 2 3. 3 4. http://www.nistep.go.jp/ NISTEP 4 5. 5 6. 6 7. 15.5% 48.0% 29.6% 6.9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% (742) 7 36.5% 63.5% : NISTEP2014NISTEP REPORT No. 16120153 6.9 8. 15.5% 48.0% 29.6% 6.9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% (742) 8 36.5% : NISTEP2014NISTEP REPORT No. 16120153 6.9 63.5% 9. 9 ? 10. () (, , 2012) () (NISTEP, 2015) (Adams et al., 2005; Wuchty, Jones & Uzzi, 2007) 10 () 11. () 11 12. 12 WoS-KAKEN WoS-KAKEN(Web of Science) WoS-KAKEN2000 WoS-KAKEN199035.747.3 Web of Science XML(SCIE, 201112)KAKEN XML2012316 3 :Web of Science KAKEN -23720154 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 (A) WoS W-K W-K 2001-2003 31,349 2001-2003 45,521 2006-2008 36,529 2006-2008 40,687 1996-1998 24,057 1996-1998 43,244 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 (B) WoS W-K W-K 2006-2008 3.6 2006-2008 4.0 2001-2003 3.9 2001-2003 5.6 1996-1998 3.3 1996-1998 5.9 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 (C) WoS W-K W-K 2006-2008 47.3 2006-2008 52.7 2001-2003 40.8 2001-2003 59.2 1996-1998 35.7 1996-1998 64.3 13. Web of Science Core Collection2008 (Acknowledge) 1 2 13 (NISTEP NOTE No. 13) 201412 1 1 2 Web of ScienceFunding Agency 14. 14Web of Science(Web of Science) 15. 15Web of Science(Web of Science) 16. 16 2009 75,352 38,129 50.6% 2010 74,179 41,590 56.1% 2011 76,048 45,304 59.6% 2012 76,223 47,193 61.9% 301,802 172,216 57.1% : Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded) XML Article, ReviewWeb of Science 20082013 20092012 Web of Science(20092012)60 17. 17 45 23 [54] 32.6 4.2 15.6 5.8 1,700 20 79 (25.7/32.6) 2.7 20082013 18. 18 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% F22:(17391) F18:(107117) F09:(18071) F05:(5921) F20:/(3996) F12:(7059) F08:/(9414) F14:(32755) F11:(24191) F07:(17856) F13:(10087) F01:(6831) F10:(12147) F16:(26271) F19:(24841) F02:(46774) F03:(70586) F04:(81397) F17:(14568) : Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded) XML 1 Article, Review 20082013 2: 19. 19 () : Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded) XML 1 Article, Review 20082013 20. / 20 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% F20:/(2134) F04:(54694) F10:(7607) F17:(10857) F16:(17048) F14:(19504) F02:(33284) F07:(11236) F13:(6590) F03:(51650) F11:(15174) F05:(3330) F01:(4300) F08:/(5531) F19:(16702) F18:(46450) F09:(8926) F12:(4408) F22:(4988) : Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded) XML 1 Article, Review 20082013 2: 21. http://www.nistep.go.jp/research/sciencemap 153 21 22. 22 23. 23 24. 24 25. -NISTEP- () ( ) () : 27.2% (2,081/7,652) : 26.3% (2,329/8,864) Web of Science() Articles Letters : 20012006 () Essential Science Indicators 22 1 1 (3,000 (1 )( 7,000 25 26. : : Web of Science ()( 26 27. 27 (, , 1+) 1,019 85.3% 0.0% 14.7% 439 6.6% 1.8% 91.6% 969 30.2% 14.4% 55.3% 391 3.1% 27.9% 69.1% 1 : Discussion paper No. 103201311 28. 28 () 1 71.1% 69.7% 60.2% 30.4% 48.4% 78.3% 61.0% 3.2% 4.6% 8.6% 18.6% 18.1% 2.9% 7.6% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (1,138) (412) (405) (576) (587) (175) (503) 97.8% 97.2% 96.8% 75.0% 87.0% 97.2% 95.3% 0.3% 0.7% 1.3% 11.8% 5.5% 0.8% 0.9% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (1,419) (690) (741) (220) (469) (497) (236) : Discussion paper No. 103201311 29. 58% 55% 38% 63% 57% 35% 55% 50% 41% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% () () *** *** *** 14% 45% 36% 12% 39% 33% 19% 46% 41% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% () () ****** *** *** *** *** 29 : Discussion paper No. 103201311 30. 20.8% (1) 19.8% (2) 26.4% (1) 20.6% (2) 20.7% (2) 10.2% (3) 8.9% (4) 1.7% (7) 12.2% (3) 21.9% (1) 22.7% (2) 27.8% (1) 6.6% (4) 7.3% (4) 12.5% (3) 19.2% (3) 6.0% (5) 6.5% (5) 3.1% (5) 2.3% (4) 2.1% (6) 4.4% (6) 2.7% (6) 2.3% (4) 0.8% (7) 1.8% (7) 0.7% (7) 1.9% (6) I. II. 69.4% 71.9% 77.0% 75.8% [897] [1,075] 1 [384] 28.1% 23.0% 24.2% 1 [475] 30.6% 30 78 () (, , ) : Discussion paper No. 103201311 31. 31 40.7 12.4% (2) 23.2% (1) 25.5% (1) 19.4% (1) 40.7% (1) 18.9% (2) 18.4% (2) 3.2% (4) 8.3% (4) 14.2% (3) 12.6% (3) 16.1% (2) 6.9% (5) 6.8% (4) 9.5% (4) 9.7% (3) 9.0% (3) 6.3% (5) 6.4% (5) 2.6% (5) 5.5% (6) 2.6% (6) 0.9% (7) 0.6% (6) 0.0% (7) 0.5% (7) 1.8% (6) 0.0% (7) II. 17.2% 27.4% 24.8% [155] 48.4% 1_[145] 3_& [190] [326] I. 82.8% 72.6% 75.2% 51.6% : Discussion paper No. 103201311 (, , ) 32. 32 33. (, ) () () 33 () 34. () : : () () ( 34 () 35. () Plan (Do) 35 36. NISTEP8 ESI 22 823 JST Sci-Geo 36 : 2010&2012NISTEP REPORT No. 15920147 () () 37. SciREX NISTEP SciREX NISTEP 37 (2015412) SciREX http://www.nistep.go.jp/research/scisip/data-and-information-infrastructure 38. 38 J P N O O P P Y Y N N N N N N () This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JPN01AH15012345, JPN01BH15012345, JPN01YH15012345; and Japan Science and Technology Agency Grant Number JPN02XX15012345. 39. () Web of Science 9 39 Web of Science NISTEP DB DB DB XML NISTEP NISTEP DB: (NISTEP) 40. (NISTEP) NISTEP2014, , NISTEP REPORT No. 161, 20153 NISTEP, 21021: http://data.nistep.go.jp/teiten/d/index.php () Web of Science KAKEN , , , , -237, 20154 () , , NISTEP NOTE No. 13. 201412 () , , , John P. Walsh, (Discussion Paper No. 103), 201311 () 2010&2012, , , , NISTEP REPORT No. 159, 20147 NISTEP , , , 2012Web Edition : http://www.nistep.go.jp/research/sciencemap () 200220082013 3, , , -237, 20154 () 2014, , -237, 20148 2014HTML: http://data.nistep.go.jp/sti_indicator/2014/RM229_00.html 40