549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO...

47
FINAL REPORT Asbestos-Containing Building Material Assessment Toronto Catholic District School Board Bishop Allen Academy Catholic School 721 Royal York Road Etobicoke, Ontario PROJECT NO. 1025760

Transcript of 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO...

Page 1: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

FINAL REPORT Asbestos-Containing Building Material Assessment Toronto Catholic District School Board

Bishop Allen Academy Catholic School 721 Royal York Road Etobicoke, Ontario

PROJECT NO. 1025760

Page 2: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board

80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario

M2N 6E8

FOR Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment – Final Report

ON Bishop Allen Academy Catholic School 721 Royal York Road

Etobicoke, Ontario

June 4, 2008

Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue

Markham, Ontario L3R 5X5

Phone: 905-474-7700

Fax: 905-479-9326

www.jacqueswhitford.com

Page 3: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Jacques Whitford Limited (Jacques Whitford) was commissioned by the Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) to conduct an Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment of Bishop Allen Academy Catholic School, located at 721 Royal York Road in Etobicoke, Ontario.

The purpose of the assessment was to assist the TCDSB to meet the requirements of the new asbestos regulation, Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA), effective November 1, 2005. The assessment also includes the identification of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) that may require special attention.

The assessment was performed for the purposes of long term management of asbestos, and not for construction or renovations purposes. Additional intrusive testing may be required prior to using this information for construction or renovation.

The work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the OHSA.

Based on visual assessment and laboratory analysis, asbestos-containing materials were identified to be present at the subject facility. Table 1 below provides a summary of the materials identified and recommendations on their management.

Table 1 – Summary of Findings and Recommendations

Issue Comments Recommendation

Asbestos Friable asbestos-containing materials were identified to be present in the form of insulating cement on pipe fittings. These materials were observed to be in good condition.

Non-friable asbestos-containing materials were not identified to be present at the subject facility.

Presumed asbestos-containing materials (PACMs) were identified to be present in the form of caulking materials, roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity.

Prior to demolition or renovation work, undertake testing of presumed asbestos-containing materials to determine their asbestos content. Asbestos-containing materials should be removed prior to the start of renovation work that may impact the material, in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05. Should a material suspected to contain asbestos fibres become uncovered during demolition or renovation activities, all work in the areas that may disturb the material should be stopped. Samples of the suspect material should be submitted for laboratory analysis to determine if asbestos fibres are present. Confirmed asbestos materials should be handled in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05.

The statements made in this Executive Summary text are subject to the same limitations included in the Closure Section 8.0, and are to be read in conjunction with the remainder of this report.

Page 4: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 ii

Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ i 

Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment ......................................................... 1 

1.0  INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1  Assessment Objectives .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2  Scope of Work ............................................................................................................................ 1 

2.0  DOCUMENT REVIEW ............................................................................................................... 2 

3.0  ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................. 2 

4.0  ASSESSMENT LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................. 3 

5.0  REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................. 4 

6.0  ASSESSMENT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ........................................................................ 4 6.1  Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials ...................................................................................... 5 6.2  Non-Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials ............................................................................... 5 6.3  Presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................................................................. 5 6.4  Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials ........................................................................................... 5 

7.0  RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................. 6 

8.0  CLOSURE .................................................................................................................................. 6 

List of Tables

Table 1 – Summary of Findings and Recommendations ..................................................................... i

List of Appendices

APPENDIX 1 Floor Plans Showing Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials ....................... 1 APPENDIX 2 Summary of Results of Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos Content .............. 2 APPENDIX 3 Summary of Occurrences of Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................ 3 APPENDIX 4 Laboratory Analytical Report – Asbestos: Polarized Light Microscopy ................. 4 APPENDIX 5 Evaluation Criteria for Assessing Asbestos-Containing Materials ......................... 5 APPENDIX 6 Terms and Definitions ............................................................................................ 6 APPENDIX 7 Summary of Results of Analysis of Bulk Samples from Previous TCDSB

Asbestos Surveys (SAP inventory) ....................................................................... 7

Page 5: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 1

ASBESTOS-CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS ASSESSMENT

1.0 INTRODUCTION Jacques Whitford Limited (Jacques Whitford) was commissioned by the Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) to conduct an Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment of Bishop Allen Academy Catholic School, located at 721 Royal York Road in Etobicoke, Ontario.

The purpose of the assessment was to assist the TCDSB to meet the requirements of the new asbestos regulation, Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA), effective November 1, 2005. The assessment also includes the identification of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) that may require special attention.

The assessment was performed for the purposes of long term management of asbestos, and not for construction or renovations purposes. Additional intrusive testing may be required prior to using this information for construction or renovation.

The work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the OHSA.

1.1 Assessment Objectives

The objective of the assessment was to:

prepare an assessment report that identifies asbestos-containing materials present at the subject facility; and,

provide recommendations for the management of these materials.

1.2 Scope of Work

The scope of work for this assessment involved the following:

a “room-by-room” visual assessment of readily accessible room spaces of the subject facility for the presence of asbestos-containing building materials;

an inventory of building materials/components that are suspected to contain asbestos;

the collection of representative bulk samples from building materials suspected of containing asbestos fibres;

laboratory analysis for the determination of the type and concentration of asbestos present in the samples submitted; and,

preparation of a report documenting the results of the assessment, providing an interpretation of the laboratory analysis results and recommendations for the management of asbestos containing materials.

Page 6: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 2

2.0 DOCUMENT REVIEW The SAP inventory provided by Toronto Catholic District School Board and documents on site, where available, were reviewed by Jacques Whitford.

3.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY A room-by-room visual assessment of the subject facility was made in order to check for the presence of materials suspected of containing asbestos.

During the assessment, locations to collect discrete bulk asbestos samples of suspect building materials were identified. Samples of representative materials were then collected at these locations in accordance with the requirements of Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

An assessment of the condition, accessibility and exposure risk was completed for each occurrence of an asbestos-containing material. The Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) document entitled “Deputy Ministers Directive 057 – Asbestos Management” (Last Revised June 16th, 1999) was used as the basis for the criteria that was applied in evaluating the presence of asbestos-containing materials at the subject areas, where applicable.

Samples of suspect ACMs from various building materials were collected and submitted to EMSL Laboratories Inc. (EMSL) located in Westmont, New Jersey, for analysis using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining. The analysis was conducted following the U.S. EPA/600/R-93/116 Methods. EMSL is certified under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) to perform asbestos analysis of bulk samples.

The number of bulk samples was based on the requirements of the new asbestos regulation that specifies the minimum number of samples of a particular building material that should be collected and tested to consider a material non-asbestos-containing. A positive stop option was used during the laboratory analysis of the building materials suspected to contain asbestos. Multiple samples of visually similar material were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis.

The positive stop option involves testing a series of samples from a particular building material until test results indicate the presence of asbestos. When this occurs, the remaining samples are not tested. This is a cost effective method of limiting the number of samples that are ultimately tested.

Additionally, materials that had been previously sampled and identified to contain asbestos were referenced from available reports and not re-tested.

A summary list of the bulk samples collected by Jacques Whitford, including a description of the material, sampling location, type of analysis and laboratory test results is provided in Appendix 2. A summary list of the bulk samples that had been sampled previously in TCDSB surveys and identified to contain asbestos is provided in Appendix 7.

Page 7: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 3

4.0 ASSESSMENT LIMITATIONS This report reflects the observations made within the subject facility only, and the results of analyses performed on specific materials sampled during the assessment. Analytical results reflect the sampled materials at the specific sampling locations.

The following rooms were not accessible during the assessment:

Rooms 108A, 124, 124A, 124B, 128A, 136A, 144A, 145C, 145D, 145E, 154, 159, 159A, and 159B.

The ceiling spaces in the following rooms could not be surveyed due to the presence of solid ceilings (drywall or plaster):

Rooms 119, 123A, 123B, 130A, 133D, 136C, 138, 140E, 145F, 146, 146A, 147, 149, 161H, 223, 223A, and 223B.

The ceiling spaces in the following rooms could not be surveyed due to height restrictions:

Rooms 136B, 144, 153A, 157 and stairwell A and C on the first floor.

Due to access restrictions imposed by working in occupied and operational spaces, the asbestos content of some building materials could not be determined at some locations. Where applicable, building materials that were not sampled but that may contain asbestos include, but are not limited to the following:

sub-grade materials;

curtains;

flooring material concealed beneath carpeting, ceramic tile, brickwork, hardwood flooring and/or concealed beneath existing sub-floors;

drywall and/or wall plaster materials concealed behind new and/or additional walls;

woven tape inside duct connection joints;

inner ducting insulation;

refractory brick;

insulation material present inside walls (i.e. suspected asbestos-containing vermiculite insulation inside concrete block and/or brick walls);

pipe straight-run and pipe elbow insulation within wall cavities, inaccessible ceiling spaces or crawlspaces;

insulation materials inside fire doors;

the mechanical inner linings of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) units; and,

heat protection materials inside mechanical installations and light fixtures.

If encountered during renovation or other activities, any suspected ACMs not identified within this report should be presumed to contain asbestos and handled as such until otherwise shown to be non asbestos-containing through analytical testing.

Page 8: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 4

5.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Asbestos is included in the Designated Substances Regulations made under Ontario's OHSA. The Designated Substance Regulation respecting Asbestos (R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 837, amended to O. Reg. 279/05) primarily regulates worker exposure to asbestos during manufacturing of asbestos containing products, but also includes requirements related to respiratory equipment, measurement of airborne fibres, and medical surveillance of exposed workers.

The Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the OHSA for Asbestos on Construction Projects and in Buildings and Repair Operations, clearly defines asbestos-containing material as a material that contains 0.5 per cent or more asbestos by dry weight. The new asbestos regulation (O. Reg. 278/05) became effective as of November 1, 2005.

The General Waste Management Regulation (O. Reg. 347/90), under the Environmental Protection Act (EPA) of Ontario, sets out the requirements for the proper disposal of asbestos waste in Ontario. The waste must be placed in a double sealed container, properly labeled, free of cuts, tears or punctures and disposed of at a licensed waste station which has been properly notified of the presence of asbestos waste.

6.0 ASSESSMENT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The result of the assessment for asbestos-containing building materials is discussed below. The evaluation criterion for assessing asbestos-containing materials is provided in Appendix 5. A list of definitions for technical terms used in this report is provided in Appendix 6.

Asbestos-containing materials are grouped into two classifications, friable and non-friable materials. Friable ACMs are those that can easily be crumbled or broken apart by mere hand pressure. When these materials break apart asbestos fibres are then released into the atmosphere. Non-friable ACMs or “manufactured products” are materials that by the nature of their manufacturing/construction do not readily allow the release of asbestos fibres. These materials should not be cut or shaped with power tools, since this procedure may allow for the release of the asbestos fibres.

O. Reg. 278/05 requires that an Asbestos Management Program (AMP) be implemented in buildings that have been identified to contain friable and non-friable ACMs.

A summary list of the bulk samples that were collected during the assessment including a description of the material, sampling location, type of analysis and laboratory test results is provided in Appendix 2.

A summary list of the bulk samples that had been identified to contain asbestos in the SAP inventory provided by TCDSB is provided in Appendix 7.

A copy of the PLM laboratory Certificate of Analysis is provided in Appendix 4.

A summary of occurrences of asbestos-containing materials for areas that were inspected is provided in Appendix 3. Each ACM occurrence includes the following information:

room component that contains ACM;

location of the ACM within the room space;

Page 9: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 5

ACM description;

estimated quantity;

original sample number or representative sample number;

friability; and,

condition.

6.1 Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials

During the assessment, friable ACMs were identified but were not sampled as they had been previously identified in the SAP inventory provided by the TCDSB. Friable ACMs were observed at the subject facility in the form of:

Insulating cement on pipe fittings.

Refer to Appendix 7 for the type and asbestos content; and Appendix 3 for specific location and condition of these ACMs.

6.2 Non-Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials

During the assessment, non-friable ACMs were not identified by laboratory analysis to be present at the subject facility.

6.3 Presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials

Presumed asbestos-containing materials were observed to be present at the subject facility. The following materials were identified but not sampled:

Window and door caulking materials;

Roof caulking materials;

Roofing materials;

Mastics; and,

Chalkboards.

These materials were not sampled during the assessment to avoid damage. The materials were observed to be in good condition. As these materials are known to have been manufactured with asbestos, they should be presumed to be asbestos-containing unless proven otherwise by laboratory analysis.

6.4 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials Refer to Appendix 2 for a list of materials identified as non-asbestos containing through sampling and laboratory analysis.

Page 10: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 6

7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on visual assessment and laboratory analysis, Jacques Whitford recommends the following with regards to the ACMs and PACMs in the facility assessed:

Prior to demolition or renovation work, undertake testing of presumed asbestos-containing materials to determine their asbestos content;

Asbestos-containing materials should be removed prior to the start of renovation work that may impact the material, in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05; and,

Should a material suspected to contain asbestos fibres become uncovered during demolition or renovation activities, all work in the areas that may disturb the material should be stopped. Samples of the suspect material should be submitted for laboratory analysis to determine if asbestos fibres are present. Confirmed asbestos materials should be handled in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05.

8.0 CLOSURE This report has been prepared for the sole benefit of the Toronto Catholic District School Board. The report may not be used by any other person or entity without the express written consent of Jacques Whitford Limited and the Toronto Catholic District School Board.

Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on decisions based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. Jacques Whitford Limited accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report.

The information and conclusions contained in this report are based upon work undertaken by trained professional and technical staff in accordance with generally accepted engineering and scientific practices current at the time the work was performed. Conclusions presented in this report should not be construed as legal advice.

The conclusions presented in this report represent the best technical judgment of Jacques Whitford Limited based on the data obtained from the work. The conclusions are based on the site conditions encountered by Jacques Whitford Limited at the time the work was performed at the specific assessment and/or sampling locations, and can only be extrapolated to an undefined limited area around these locations. The extent of the limited area depends on building construction and conditions, weather, building usage and other factors. Due to the nature of the investigation and the limited data available, Jacques Whitford Limited cannot warrant against undiscovered environmental liabilities.

If any conditions become apparent that differ significantly from our understanding of conditions as presented in this report, we request that we be notified immediately to reassess the conclusions provided herein.

Page 11: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 7

We trust that the above is satisfactory for your purposes at this time. Should you have any questions or concerns, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at your convenience.

This report was prepared by Menaka Yogendrarajah and reviewed by Martin Ling and Steven D. Fulford.

Sincerely,

JACQUES WHITFORD LIMITED

Original Signature on File Original Signature on File Menaka Yogendrarajah Steven D. Fulford Report Author Senior Technical Reviewer Original Signature on File Martin Ling Project Manager Enclosures P:\CMiC Jobs\1025xxx\1025760\REPORTS\549 - Bishop Allen Academy\549_Bishop Allen Academy Final Report.docx

Page 12: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

APPENDIX 1 Floor Plans Showing Locations of

Asbestos-Containing Materials

Page 13: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8
Page 14: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8
Page 15: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

APPENDIX 2 Summary of Results of Analysis of Bulk Samples

for Asbestos Content

Page 16: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

Summary of Bulk Sample Analysis for Asbestos Type and Content

SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled

MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location

549-BS-01A None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with brown specks

RM 112

549-BS-01B None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with brown specks

RM 125

549-BS-01C None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with brown specks

RM 125A

549-BS-02A None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - pink with pattern

RM 148C

549-BS-02B None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - pink with pattern

RM 148C

549-BS-02C None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - pink with pattern

RM 148C

549-BS-03A None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - blue with blue and white flecks

RM 123

549-BS-03B None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - blue with blue and white flecks

RM 161

549-BS-03C None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - blue with blue and white flecks

RM 111

549-BS-04A None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey flecks

RM 118A

549-BS-04B None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey flecks

RM 117

549-BS-04C None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey flecks

RM 119

549-BS-05A None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with black flecks

RM 107A

549-BS-05B None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with black flecks

RM 115

549-BS-05C None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with black flecks

RM 107

549-BS-06A None Detected PLMLinoleum sheet flooring - brownRM 109

PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)

1

Notes:

04-Jun-08

Page 17: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled

MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location

549-BS-06B None Detected PLMLinoleum sheet flooring - brownRM 111

549-BS-06C None Detected PLMLinoleum sheet flooring - brownRM 118

549-BS-07A None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRM 102

549-BS-07B None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRM 103

549-BS-07C None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRM 107

549-BS-07D None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRM 108

549-BS-07E None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRM 113

549-BS-07F None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRM 111

549-BS-07G None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRM 148D

549-BS-08A None Detected PLM2'x6' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern

RM 125D

549-BS-08B None Detected PLM2'x6' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern

RM 125F

549-BS-08C None Detected PLM2'x6' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern

RM 103

549-BS-09A None Detected PLM2'x4' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern

RM 108

549-BS-09B None Detected PLM2'x4' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern

RM 107

549-BS-09C None Detected PLM2'x4' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern

RM 102

549-BS-10A None Detected PLM2'x4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern

RM 105A

549-BS-10B None Detected PLM2'x4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern

RM 105

PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)

2

Notes:

04-Jun-08

Page 18: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled

MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location

549-BS-10C None Detected PLM2'x4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern

RM 203

549-BS-11A None Detected PLM2'x6' acoustical ceiling tile - small pinhole pattern

RM 100

549-BS-11B None Detected PLM2'x6' acoustical ceiling tile - small pinhole pattern

RM 129

549-BS-11C None Detected PLM2'x6' acoustical ceiling tile - small pinhole pattern

RM 161B

549-BS-12A None Detected PLMPlasterRM 104

549-BS-12B None Detected PLMPlasterRM 104

549-BS-12C None Detected PLMPlasterRM 111

549-BS-12D None Detected PLMPlasterRM 111

549-BS-12E None Detected PLMPlasterRM 106

549-BS-12F None Detected PLMPlasterRM 106

549-BS-12G None Detected PLMPlasterRM 107

549-BS-13A None Detected PLMSprayed fireproofingRM 108

549-BS-13B None Detected PLMSprayed fireproofingRM 105

549-BS-13C None Detected PLMSprayed fireproofingRM 104A

549-BS-13D None Detected PLMSprayed fireproofingRM 100

549-BS-13E None Detected PLMSprayed fireproofingRM 125

549-BS-13F None Detected PLMSprayed fireproofingRM 126

PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)

3

Notes:

04-Jun-08

Page 19: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled

MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location

549-BS-13G None Detected PLMSprayed fireproofingRM 126

549-BS-14A None Detected PLMLinoleum sheet flooring - white with pink and grey specks

RM 112

549-BS-14B None Detected PLMLinoleum sheet flooring - white with pink and grey specks

RM 113

549-BS-14C None Detected PLMLinoleum sheet flooring - white with pink and grey specks

RM 113

549-BS-15A None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - pink with pink smears

RM 125B

549-BS-15B None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - pink with pink smears

RM 125B

549-BS-15C None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - pink with pink smears

RM 125B

549-BS-16A None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl sheet flooring - green with green smears

RM 126

549-BS-16B None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl sheet flooring - green with green smears

RM 127

549-BS-16C None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl sheet flooring - green with green smears

RM 127

549-BS-17A None Detected PLMVinyl sheet flooring - greenRM 145A

549-BS-17B None Detected PLMVinyl sheet flooring - greenRM 145A

549-BS-17C None Detected PLMVinyl sheet flooring - greenRM 145A

549-BS-18A None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - yellow with green and white specks

RM 105

549-BS-18B None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - yellow with green and white specks

RM 105

549-BS-18C None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - yellow with green and white specks

RM 105

549-BS-19A None Detected PLMVinyl sheet flooring - brownRM 144

PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)

4

Notes:

04-Jun-08

Page 20: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled

MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location

549-BS-19B None Detected PLMVinyl sheet flooring - brownRM 144

549-BS-19C None Detected PLMVinyl sheet flooring - brownRM 144

PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)

5

Notes:

04-Jun-08

Page 21: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

APPENDIX 3 Summary of Occurrences of Asbestos

Containing Materials

Page 22: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

Summary of Occurrences of Asbestos-Containing Materials

RoomSpecificLocation

ACM Type EstimatedQuantity

SampleNumber

OriginalSample?

Asbestos Content

Friable?Visible?

Access. Comments/Notes

ACMConditionLevel

ACMLocation

insulating cement on pipe fitting 5-10 ns No 57% Chrysotile Yes Yes B good ACM as identified in

SAP Inventory

129 mechanicalbelow ceiling1

insulating cement on pipe fitting 10 ns No 40-50% Chrysotile Yes Yes C good ACM as identified in

SAP Inventory

130 mechanicalabove ceiling1

insulating cement on pipe fitting 15 ns No 40-50% Chrysotile Yes Yes B good ACM as identified in

SAP Inventory

131 mechanicalbelow ceiling1

insulating cement on pipe fitting nq ns No 40-50% Chrysotile Yes No D unknown (PACM)

Could not confirm

presence or quantity due to application of

sprayed fireproofing

145A mechanicalabove ceiling1

insulating cement on pipe fitting nq ns No ns Yes No D unknown (PACM)

Could not confirm

presence or quantity due to

solid ceiling

147 mechanicalabove ceiling1

insulating cement on pipe fitting 5 ns No 57% Chrysotile Yes Yes C good ACM148 mechanicalbelow ceiling1

insulating cement on pipe fitting 15-17 ns No 57% Chrysotile Yes Yes B good ACM as identified in

SAP Inventory

153 mechanicalbelow ceiling1

Yes - Suspect material is visible without opening hatches or lifting ceiling tiles No - Suspect material can only be viewed if access hatches are opened or ceiling tiles lifted.

A - Areas of the building within reach (from floor level) of all building usersB - Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladderC - Areas of the building above 2.4 m where use of a ladder is required to reach the asbestosD - Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc., where demolition of the ceiling, wall, or equipment, etc., is required to reach the asbestos

Accessibility Classification

Visibility

Notes: ACM - asbestos-containing material PACM - presumed asbestos-containing material Access. - accessibility nq - not quantified na - not applicable ns - not sampled REF - reference sample x - estimated number of units F - friable NF - non friable PFM - potentialy friable material S - Sample (original sample collected) V - Visually identical sample

1

* Based on a non-intrusive inspection of visible surfaces within the room space.

04-Jun-08

Page 23: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

RoomSpecificLocation

ACM Type EstimatedQuantity

SampleNumber

OriginalSample?

Asbestos Content

Friable?Visible?

Access. Comments/Notes

ACMConditionLevel

ACMLocation

insulating cement on pipe fitting 15-20 ns No 57% Chrysotile Yes Yes A good ACM as identified in

SAP inventory

159 mechanicalbelow ceiling1

insulating cement on pipe fitting 2 ns No 57% Chrysotile Yes No C good ACM as identified in

SAP inventory

227 mechanicalabove ceiling2

Yes - Suspect material is visible without opening hatches or lifting ceiling tiles No - Suspect material can only be viewed if access hatches are opened or ceiling tiles lifted.

A - Areas of the building within reach (from floor level) of all building usersB - Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladderC - Areas of the building above 2.4 m where use of a ladder is required to reach the asbestosD - Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc., where demolition of the ceiling, wall, or equipment, etc., is required to reach the asbestos

Accessibility Classification

Visibility

Notes: ACM - asbestos-containing material PACM - presumed asbestos-containing material Access. - accessibility nq - not quantified na - not applicable ns - not sampled REF - reference sample x - estimated number of units F - friable NF - non friable PFM - potentialy friable material S - Sample (original sample collected) V - Visually identical sample

2

* Based on a non-intrusive inspection of visible surfaces within the room space.

04-Jun-08

Page 24: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

APPENDIX 4 Laboratory Analytical Report – Asbestos:

Polarized Light Microscopy

Page 25: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

180702726

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM

1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 1/3/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]

549-BS-01A180702726-0001

Rm 112, 12x12 VFT - White w/Brown Specks

White None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-01B180702726-0002

Rm 125, 12x12 VFT - White w/Brown Specks

White None Detected

Non-FibrousLayers: 3

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-01C180702726-0003

Rm 125A, 12x12 VFT - White w/Brown Specks

White None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-02A180702726-0004

Rm 148C, 12x12 VFT - Pink w/Pattern

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousLayers: 3

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-02B180702726-0005

Rm 148C, 12x12 VFT - Pink w/Pattern

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousLayers: 3

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-02C180702726-0006

Rm 148C, 12x12 VFT - Pink w/Pattern

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousLayers: 3

Cellulose2% Non-fibrous (other)98%

549-BS-03A180702726-0007

Rm 123, 12x12 VFT - Blue w/Blue-White Flecks

Blue None Detected

Non-FibrousLayers: 2

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-03B180702726-0008

Rm 161, 12x12 VFT - Blue w/Blue-White Flecks

Blue None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

1

R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)

Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)

Page 26: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

180702726

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM

1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 1/3/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]

549-BS-03C180702726-0009

Rm 111, 12x12 VFT - Blue w/Blue-White Flecks

Blue None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-04A180702726-0010

Rm 118A, 12x12 VFT - White w/Gray Flecks

White None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-04B180702726-0011

Rm 117, 12x12 VFT - White w/Gray Flecks

White None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-04C180702726-0012

Rm 119, 12x12 VFT - White w/Gray Flecks

White None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-05A180702726-0013

Rm 107A, 12x12 VFT - White w/Black Flecks

White None Detected

Non-FibrousLayers: 2

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-05B180702726-0014

Rm 115, 12x12 VFT - White w/Black Flecks

White None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-05C180702726-0015

Rm 107, 12x12 VFT - White w/Black Flecks

White None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-06A180702726-0016

Rm 109, Linoleum Sheet Flooring - Brown

Beige None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

2

R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)

Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)

Page 27: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

180702726

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM

1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 1/3/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]

549-BS-06B180702726-0017

Rm 111, Linoleum Sheet Flooring - Brown

Beige None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-06C180702726-0018

Rm 118, Linoleum Sheet Flooring - Brown

Beige None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-07A180702726-0019

Rm 102, Drywall Joint-Fill Compound

White None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-07B180702726-0020

Rm 103, Drywall Joint-Fill Compound

White None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-07C180702726-0021

Rm 107, Drywall Joint-Fill Compound

White None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-07D180702726-0022

Rm 108, Drywall Joint-Fill Compound

White None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-07E180702726-0023

Rm 113, Drywall Joint-Fill Compound

White None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-07F180702726-0024

Rm 111, Drywall Joint-Fill Compound

White None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

3

R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)

Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)

Page 28: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

180702726

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM

1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 1/3/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]

549-BS-07G180702726-0025

Rm 148D, Drywall Joint-Fill Compound

White None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-08A180702726-0026

Rm 125D, 2'x6' Acoust. CT, Sm. Fiss. Pin. Pattern

Various None Detected

FibrousLayers: 2

Cellulose25%Min. Wool20%

Non-fibrous (other)55%

549-BS-08B180702726-0027

Rm 125F, 2'x6' Acoust. CT, Sm. Fiss. Pin. Pattern

Beige None Detected

FibrousHomogeneous

Cellulose45%Min. Wool5%

Non-fibrous (other)50%

549-BS-08C180702726-0028

Rm 103, 2'x6' Acoust. CT, Sm. Fiss. Pin. Pattern

Beige None Detected

FibrousHomogeneous

Cellulose50%Glass2%

Non-fibrous (other)48%

549-BS-09A180702726-0029

Rm 108, 2'x4' Acoust. CT, Sm. Fiss. Pin. Pattern

Beige None Detected

FibrousHomogeneous

Cellulose30%Min. Wool30%

Non-fibrous (other)40%

549-BS-09B180702726-0030

Rm 107, 2'x4' Acoust. CT, Sm. Fiss. Pin. Pattern

Beige None Detected

FibrousHomogeneous

Cellulose30%Min. Wool25%

Non-fibrous (other)45%

549-BS-09C180702726-0031

Rm 102, 2'x4' Acoust. CT, Sm. Fiss. Pin. Pattern

Beige None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose30%Min. Wool15%

Non-fibrous (other)55%

549-BS-10A180702726-0032

Rm 105A, 2'x4' Acoust. CT, Med. Fiss. Pin. Pattern

Beige None Detected

FibrousHomogeneous

Cellulose25%Min. Wool20%

Non-fibrous (other)55%

4

R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)

Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)

Page 29: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

180702726

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM

1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 1/3/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]

549-BS-10B180702726-0033

Rm 105, 2'x4' Acoust. CT, Med. Fiss. Pin. Pattern

Beige None Detected

FibrousHomogeneous

Cellulose30%Min. Wool15%

Non-fibrous (other)55%

549-BS-10C180702726-0034

Rm 203, 2'x4' Acoust. CT, Med. Fiss. Pin. Pattern

Beige None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose30%Min. Wool15%

Non-fibrous (other)55%

549-BS-11A180702726-0035

Rm 100, 2'x6' Acoust. CT, Small Pinhole Pattern

Various None Detected

FibrousLayers: 2

Cellulose20%Min. Wool40%

Non-fibrous (other)40%

549-BS-11B180702726-0036

Rm 129, 2'x6' Acoust. CT, Small Pinhole Pattern

Various None Detected

FibrousLayers: 2

Cellulose20%Min. Wool40%

Non-fibrous (other)40%

549-BS-11C180702726-0037

Rm 161B, 2'x6' Acoust. CT, Small Pinhole Pattern

Various None Detected

FibrousLayers: 2

Cellulose25%Min. Wool35%

Non-fibrous (other)40%

549-BS-12A180702726-0038

Rm 104, Plaster Various None Detected

Non-FibrousLayers: 2

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-12B180702726-0039

Rm 104, Plaster Various None Detected

Non-FibrousLayers: 2

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-12C180702726-0040

Rm 111, Plaster White None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

5

R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)

Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)

Page 30: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

180702726

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM

1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 1/3/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]

549-BS-12D180702726-0041

Rm 111, Plaster White None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-12E180702726-0042

Rm 106, Plaster White None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-12F180702726-0043

Rm 106, Plaster White None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-12G180702726-0044

Rm 107, Plaster White None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-13A180702726-0045

Rm 108, Spray-on Fireproofing

Beige None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose40% Non-fibrous (other)60%

549-BS-13B180702726-0046

Rm 105, Spray-on Fireproofing

Grayish None Detected

FibrousHomogeneous

Cellulose33% Non-fibrous (other)67%

549-BS-13C180702726-0047

Rm 104A, Spray-on Fireproofing

Grayish None Detected

FibrousHomogeneous

Cellulose40% Non-fibrous (other)60%

549-BS-13D180702726-0048

Rm 100, Spray-on Fireproofing

Beige None Detected

FibrousHomogeneous

Cellulose33% Non-fibrous (other)67%

6

R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)

Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)

Page 31: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

180702726

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM

1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 1/3/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]

549-BS-13E180702726-0049

Rm 125, Spray-on Fireproofing

White None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Min. Wool85% Non-fibrous (other)15%

549-BS-13F180702726-0050

Rm 126, Spray-on Fireproofing

White None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Min. Wool85% Non-fibrous (other)15%

549-BS-13G180702726-0051

Rm 126, Spray-on Fireproofing

White None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Min. Wool85% Non-fibrous (other)15%

549-BS-14A180702726-0052

Rm 112, Linol. Sheet Flr, White w/Pink-Gray Specks

Various None Detected

FibrousLayers: 3

Cellulose4%Glass4%Synthetic4%

Non-fibrous (other)88%

549-BS-14B180702726-0053

Rm 113, Linol. Sheet Flr, White w/Pink-Gray Specks

Various None Detected

FibrousLayers: 3

Cellulose5%Glass5%Synthetic5%

Non-fibrous (other)85%

549-BS-14C180702726-0054

Rm 113, Linol. Sheet Flr, White w/Pink-Gray Specks

Various None Detected

FibrousLayers: 3

Cellulose10%Glass2%Synthetic5%

Non-fibrous (other)83%

549-BS-15A180702726-0055

Rm 125B, 12x12 VFT, Pink w/Pink Smears

Pink None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

7

R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)

Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)

Page 32: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

180702726

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM

1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 1/3/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]

549-BS-15B180702726-0056

Rm 125B, 12x12 VFT, Pink w/Pink Smears

Pink None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-15C180702726-0057

Rm 125B, 12x12 VFT, Pink w/Pink Smears

Pink None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-16A180702726-0058

Rm 126, 12x12 VFT, Green w/Green Smears

Green None Detected

Non-FibrousLayers: 2

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-16B180702726-0059

Rm 127, 12x12 VFT, Green w/Green Smears

Green None Detected

Non-FibrousLayers: 2

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-16C180702726-0060

Rm 127, 12x12 VFT, Green w/Green Smears

Green None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-17A180702726-0061

Rm 145A, Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Green

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousLayers: 3

Glass2% Non-fibrous (other)98%

549-BS-17B180702726-0062

Rm 145A, Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Green

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousLayers: 3

Glass2% Non-fibrous (other)98%

549-BS-17C180702726-0063

Rm 145A, Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Green

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Glass3% Non-fibrous (other)97%

8

R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)

Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)

Page 33: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

180702726

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM

1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 1/3/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]

549-BS-18A180702726-0064

Rm 105, 12x12 VFT, Yellow w/Green-White Specks

Yellow None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-18B180702726-0065

Rm 105, 12x12 VFT, Yellow w/Green-White Specks

Yellow None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-18C180702726-0066

Rm 105, 12x12 VFT, Yellow w/Green-White Specks

Yellow None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-19A180702726-0067

Rm 144, Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Brown

Tan None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-19B180702726-0068

Rm 144, Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Brown

Tan None Detected

Non-FibrousHomogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

549-BS-19C180702726-0069

Rm 144, Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Brown

Tan None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

Layers were combined prior to analysis at client's request.

9

R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)

Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)

Page 34: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

APPENDIX 5 Evaluation Criteria for Assessing Asbestos

Containing Materials

Page 35: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 Appendix 5-1

Criteria for Assessing Asbestos Containing Materials

A description of the criteria used in evaluating the condition, accessibility and exposure risk of asbestos-containing materials is provided below. The criteria is generally based on the Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) document entitled “Deputy Ministers Directive 057 – Asbestos Management” (Last Revised 1999/07/16) and industry standards of practice.

Assessment of Condition

Spray Applied Fireproofing, Insulation and Textured Finishes

In evaluating the condition of ACM spray applied as fireproofing, thermal insulation or texture, decorative or acoustic finishes, the following criteria apply:

Good

Surface of material shows no significant signs of damage, deterioration or delamination. Up to one percent visible damage to surface is allowed within range of GOOD. Evaluation of sprayed fireproofing requires the Assessor to be familiar with the irregular surface texture typical of sprayed asbestos products. GOOD condition includes unencapsulated or unpainted fireproofing or texture finishes, where no delamination or damage is observed, and encapsulated fireproofing or texture finishes where the encapsulation has been applied after the damage or fallout occurred.

Poor

Sprayed materials show signs of damage, delamination or deterioration. More than one percent damage to surface of ACM spray.

In observation areas, where damage exists in isolated locations, both GOOD and POOR condition may be reported. The extent or percentage of each condition will be recorded on the Assessor reassessment form.

FAIR condition is not utilized or considered as a valid criterion in the evaluation of sprayed fireproofing, sprayed insulation, or texture coat finishes.

The evaluation of ACM spray applied as fireproofing, non-mechanical thermal insulation, or texture, decorative or acoustic finishes which are present above ceilings, may be limited by the number of observations made, and by building components such as ducts or full height walls that obstruct the above ceiling observations. Persons entering the ceiling area are advised to be watchful for ACM DEBRIS prior to accessing or working above ceilings in areas of building with ACM, regardless of the reported condition.

Other ACM

In evaluating the condition of mechanical insulation (on boilers, breaching, ductwork, piping, tanks, equipment etc.) the following criteria are used:

Page 36: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 Appendix 5-2

Good

Insulation is completely covered in jacketing and exhibits no evidence of damage or deterioration. No insulation is exposed. Includes conditions where the jacketing has minor surface damage (i.e., scuffs or stains), but the jacketing is not penetrated.

Fair

Minor penetration damage to jacketed insulation (cuts, tears, nicks, deterioration or delamination) or undamaged insulation that has never been jacketed. Insulation is exposed but not showing surface disintegration. The extent of missing insulation ranges should be minor to none.

Poor

Original insulation jacket is missing, damaged, deteriorated or delaminated. Insulation is exposed and significant areas have been dislodged. Damage cannot be readily repaired. The evaluation of mechanical insulation may be limited by the number of observations made and building components such as ducts or full height walls that obstruct observations. In these circumstances, it is not possible to observe each foot of mechanical insulation from all angles.

Non-Friable and Potentially Friable Materials

Non-friable materials generally have little potential to release airborne fibres, even when damaged by mechanical breakage. However, some non-friable materials, i.e., exterior asbestos cement products, may have deteriorated so that the binder no longer effectively contains the asbestos fibres. In such cases of significantly deteriorated non-friable material, the material will be treated as a friable product.

Evaluation of Accessibility

The accessibility of building materials known or suspected of being ACM is rated according to the following criteria:

Access (A)

Areas of the building within reach of all building users. Includes areas such as gymnasiums, workshops, and storage areas where activities of the building users may result in disturbance of ACM not normally within reach from floor level.

Access (B)

Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladder. Includes: frequently entered pipe chases, tunnels and service areas or areas within reach from a fixed ladder or catwalk, i.e., tops of equipment, mezzanines.

Access (C) Exposed

Areas of the building above 8'0" where use of a ladder is required to reach the ACM. Only refers to ACM materials that are exposed to view, from the floor or ladder, without removing or opening other building components such as ceiling tiles, or service access doors or hatches. Does not include infrequently accessed service areas of the building.

Page 37: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 Appendix 5-3

Access (C) Concealed

Areas of the building which require the removal of a building component, including lay-in ceilings and access panels into solid ceiling systems. Includes rarely entered crawl spaces, attic spaces, etc. Observations are limited to the extent visible from the access points.

Access (D)

Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc. where demolition of the ceiling, wall or equipment, etc., is required to reach the ACM. Evaluation of the condition and extent of ACM is limited or impossible, depending on the Assessor's ability to visually examine the materials In Access D.

Page 38: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

APPENDIX 6 Terms and Definitions

Page 39: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 Appendix 6-1

Terms and Definitions

Asbestos

Any of the following asbestiform silicate minerals: actinolite asbestos, anthophyllite asbestos, chrysotile, crocidolite, cumming tonite-grunerite asbestos (amosite), tremolite asbestos with a dry weight concentration greater than 0.5%.

Friable

Capable of being crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

HEPA Filter

A high efficiency particulate aerosol filter that is at least 99.97 per cent efficient in collecting a 0.3 micrometre aerosol.

Homogeneous Material

A material that is uniform in colour and texture

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)

Polarized Light Microscopy is a technique accepted by the US Environmental Protection Agency as a screening method for detecting asbestos fibres in bulk material samples.

Presumed Asbestos Containing Materials (PACMs)

Materials that are known to have been manufactured contain asbestos. Testing of the material is required to determine if the material contains asbestos fibres.

Recommended Corrective Actions (RCAs)

Areas identified to consist of asbestos-containing or presumed asbestos-containing materials that require attention to repair or remove damaged materials.

Building

Any structure, vault, chamber or tunnel including, without limitation, the electrical, plumbing, heating and air handling equipment (including rigid duct work) of the structure, vault, chamber or tunnel.

Page 40: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

APPENDIX 7 Summary of Results of Analysis of Bulk Samples

- SAP inventory

Page 41: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8
Page 42: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8
Page 43: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8
Page 44: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8
Page 45: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8
Page 46: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8
Page 47: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8