549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO...
Transcript of 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO...
![Page 1: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
FINAL REPORT Asbestos-Containing Building Material Assessment Toronto Catholic District School Board
Bishop Allen Academy Catholic School 721 Royal York Road Etobicoke, Ontario
PROJECT NO. 1025760
![Page 2: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board
80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario
M2N 6E8
FOR Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment – Final Report
ON Bishop Allen Academy Catholic School 721 Royal York Road
Etobicoke, Ontario
June 4, 2008
Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue
Markham, Ontario L3R 5X5
Phone: 905-474-7700
Fax: 905-479-9326
www.jacqueswhitford.com
![Page 3: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Jacques Whitford Limited (Jacques Whitford) was commissioned by the Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) to conduct an Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment of Bishop Allen Academy Catholic School, located at 721 Royal York Road in Etobicoke, Ontario.
The purpose of the assessment was to assist the TCDSB to meet the requirements of the new asbestos regulation, Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA), effective November 1, 2005. The assessment also includes the identification of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) that may require special attention.
The assessment was performed for the purposes of long term management of asbestos, and not for construction or renovations purposes. Additional intrusive testing may be required prior to using this information for construction or renovation.
The work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the OHSA.
Based on visual assessment and laboratory analysis, asbestos-containing materials were identified to be present at the subject facility. Table 1 below provides a summary of the materials identified and recommendations on their management.
Table 1 – Summary of Findings and Recommendations
Issue Comments Recommendation
Asbestos Friable asbestos-containing materials were identified to be present in the form of insulating cement on pipe fittings. These materials were observed to be in good condition.
Non-friable asbestos-containing materials were not identified to be present at the subject facility.
Presumed asbestos-containing materials (PACMs) were identified to be present in the form of caulking materials, roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity.
Prior to demolition or renovation work, undertake testing of presumed asbestos-containing materials to determine their asbestos content. Asbestos-containing materials should be removed prior to the start of renovation work that may impact the material, in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05. Should a material suspected to contain asbestos fibres become uncovered during demolition or renovation activities, all work in the areas that may disturb the material should be stopped. Samples of the suspect material should be submitted for laboratory analysis to determine if asbestos fibres are present. Confirmed asbestos materials should be handled in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05.
The statements made in this Executive Summary text are subject to the same limitations included in the Closure Section 8.0, and are to be read in conjunction with the remainder of this report.
![Page 4: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 ii
Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ i
Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment ......................................................... 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Assessment Objectives .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Scope of Work ............................................................................................................................ 1
2.0 DOCUMENT REVIEW ............................................................................................................... 2
3.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................. 2
4.0 ASSESSMENT LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................. 3
5.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................. 4
6.0 ASSESSMENT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ........................................................................ 4 6.1 Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials ...................................................................................... 5 6.2 Non-Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials ............................................................................... 5 6.3 Presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................................................................. 5 6.4 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials ........................................................................................... 5
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................. 6
8.0 CLOSURE .................................................................................................................................. 6
List of Tables
Table 1 – Summary of Findings and Recommendations ..................................................................... i
List of Appendices
APPENDIX 1 Floor Plans Showing Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials ....................... 1 APPENDIX 2 Summary of Results of Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos Content .............. 2 APPENDIX 3 Summary of Occurrences of Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................ 3 APPENDIX 4 Laboratory Analytical Report – Asbestos: Polarized Light Microscopy ................. 4 APPENDIX 5 Evaluation Criteria for Assessing Asbestos-Containing Materials ......................... 5 APPENDIX 6 Terms and Definitions ............................................................................................ 6 APPENDIX 7 Summary of Results of Analysis of Bulk Samples from Previous TCDSB
Asbestos Surveys (SAP inventory) ....................................................................... 7
![Page 5: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 1
ASBESTOS-CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
1.0 INTRODUCTION Jacques Whitford Limited (Jacques Whitford) was commissioned by the Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) to conduct an Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment of Bishop Allen Academy Catholic School, located at 721 Royal York Road in Etobicoke, Ontario.
The purpose of the assessment was to assist the TCDSB to meet the requirements of the new asbestos regulation, Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA), effective November 1, 2005. The assessment also includes the identification of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) that may require special attention.
The assessment was performed for the purposes of long term management of asbestos, and not for construction or renovations purposes. Additional intrusive testing may be required prior to using this information for construction or renovation.
The work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the OHSA.
1.1 Assessment Objectives
The objective of the assessment was to:
prepare an assessment report that identifies asbestos-containing materials present at the subject facility; and,
provide recommendations for the management of these materials.
1.2 Scope of Work
The scope of work for this assessment involved the following:
a “room-by-room” visual assessment of readily accessible room spaces of the subject facility for the presence of asbestos-containing building materials;
an inventory of building materials/components that are suspected to contain asbestos;
the collection of representative bulk samples from building materials suspected of containing asbestos fibres;
laboratory analysis for the determination of the type and concentration of asbestos present in the samples submitted; and,
preparation of a report documenting the results of the assessment, providing an interpretation of the laboratory analysis results and recommendations for the management of asbestos containing materials.
![Page 6: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 2
2.0 DOCUMENT REVIEW The SAP inventory provided by Toronto Catholic District School Board and documents on site, where available, were reviewed by Jacques Whitford.
3.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY A room-by-room visual assessment of the subject facility was made in order to check for the presence of materials suspected of containing asbestos.
During the assessment, locations to collect discrete bulk asbestos samples of suspect building materials were identified. Samples of representative materials were then collected at these locations in accordance with the requirements of Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act.
An assessment of the condition, accessibility and exposure risk was completed for each occurrence of an asbestos-containing material. The Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) document entitled “Deputy Ministers Directive 057 – Asbestos Management” (Last Revised June 16th, 1999) was used as the basis for the criteria that was applied in evaluating the presence of asbestos-containing materials at the subject areas, where applicable.
Samples of suspect ACMs from various building materials were collected and submitted to EMSL Laboratories Inc. (EMSL) located in Westmont, New Jersey, for analysis using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining. The analysis was conducted following the U.S. EPA/600/R-93/116 Methods. EMSL is certified under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) to perform asbestos analysis of bulk samples.
The number of bulk samples was based on the requirements of the new asbestos regulation that specifies the minimum number of samples of a particular building material that should be collected and tested to consider a material non-asbestos-containing. A positive stop option was used during the laboratory analysis of the building materials suspected to contain asbestos. Multiple samples of visually similar material were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis.
The positive stop option involves testing a series of samples from a particular building material until test results indicate the presence of asbestos. When this occurs, the remaining samples are not tested. This is a cost effective method of limiting the number of samples that are ultimately tested.
Additionally, materials that had been previously sampled and identified to contain asbestos were referenced from available reports and not re-tested.
A summary list of the bulk samples collected by Jacques Whitford, including a description of the material, sampling location, type of analysis and laboratory test results is provided in Appendix 2. A summary list of the bulk samples that had been sampled previously in TCDSB surveys and identified to contain asbestos is provided in Appendix 7.
![Page 7: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 3
4.0 ASSESSMENT LIMITATIONS This report reflects the observations made within the subject facility only, and the results of analyses performed on specific materials sampled during the assessment. Analytical results reflect the sampled materials at the specific sampling locations.
The following rooms were not accessible during the assessment:
Rooms 108A, 124, 124A, 124B, 128A, 136A, 144A, 145C, 145D, 145E, 154, 159, 159A, and 159B.
The ceiling spaces in the following rooms could not be surveyed due to the presence of solid ceilings (drywall or plaster):
Rooms 119, 123A, 123B, 130A, 133D, 136C, 138, 140E, 145F, 146, 146A, 147, 149, 161H, 223, 223A, and 223B.
The ceiling spaces in the following rooms could not be surveyed due to height restrictions:
Rooms 136B, 144, 153A, 157 and stairwell A and C on the first floor.
Due to access restrictions imposed by working in occupied and operational spaces, the asbestos content of some building materials could not be determined at some locations. Where applicable, building materials that were not sampled but that may contain asbestos include, but are not limited to the following:
sub-grade materials;
curtains;
flooring material concealed beneath carpeting, ceramic tile, brickwork, hardwood flooring and/or concealed beneath existing sub-floors;
drywall and/or wall plaster materials concealed behind new and/or additional walls;
woven tape inside duct connection joints;
inner ducting insulation;
refractory brick;
insulation material present inside walls (i.e. suspected asbestos-containing vermiculite insulation inside concrete block and/or brick walls);
pipe straight-run and pipe elbow insulation within wall cavities, inaccessible ceiling spaces or crawlspaces;
insulation materials inside fire doors;
the mechanical inner linings of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) units; and,
heat protection materials inside mechanical installations and light fixtures.
If encountered during renovation or other activities, any suspected ACMs not identified within this report should be presumed to contain asbestos and handled as such until otherwise shown to be non asbestos-containing through analytical testing.
![Page 8: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 4
5.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Asbestos is included in the Designated Substances Regulations made under Ontario's OHSA. The Designated Substance Regulation respecting Asbestos (R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 837, amended to O. Reg. 279/05) primarily regulates worker exposure to asbestos during manufacturing of asbestos containing products, but also includes requirements related to respiratory equipment, measurement of airborne fibres, and medical surveillance of exposed workers.
The Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the OHSA for Asbestos on Construction Projects and in Buildings and Repair Operations, clearly defines asbestos-containing material as a material that contains 0.5 per cent or more asbestos by dry weight. The new asbestos regulation (O. Reg. 278/05) became effective as of November 1, 2005.
The General Waste Management Regulation (O. Reg. 347/90), under the Environmental Protection Act (EPA) of Ontario, sets out the requirements for the proper disposal of asbestos waste in Ontario. The waste must be placed in a double sealed container, properly labeled, free of cuts, tears or punctures and disposed of at a licensed waste station which has been properly notified of the presence of asbestos waste.
6.0 ASSESSMENT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The result of the assessment for asbestos-containing building materials is discussed below. The evaluation criterion for assessing asbestos-containing materials is provided in Appendix 5. A list of definitions for technical terms used in this report is provided in Appendix 6.
Asbestos-containing materials are grouped into two classifications, friable and non-friable materials. Friable ACMs are those that can easily be crumbled or broken apart by mere hand pressure. When these materials break apart asbestos fibres are then released into the atmosphere. Non-friable ACMs or “manufactured products” are materials that by the nature of their manufacturing/construction do not readily allow the release of asbestos fibres. These materials should not be cut or shaped with power tools, since this procedure may allow for the release of the asbestos fibres.
O. Reg. 278/05 requires that an Asbestos Management Program (AMP) be implemented in buildings that have been identified to contain friable and non-friable ACMs.
A summary list of the bulk samples that were collected during the assessment including a description of the material, sampling location, type of analysis and laboratory test results is provided in Appendix 2.
A summary list of the bulk samples that had been identified to contain asbestos in the SAP inventory provided by TCDSB is provided in Appendix 7.
A copy of the PLM laboratory Certificate of Analysis is provided in Appendix 4.
A summary of occurrences of asbestos-containing materials for areas that were inspected is provided in Appendix 3. Each ACM occurrence includes the following information:
room component that contains ACM;
location of the ACM within the room space;
![Page 9: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 5
ACM description;
estimated quantity;
original sample number or representative sample number;
friability; and,
condition.
6.1 Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials
During the assessment, friable ACMs were identified but were not sampled as they had been previously identified in the SAP inventory provided by the TCDSB. Friable ACMs were observed at the subject facility in the form of:
Insulating cement on pipe fittings.
Refer to Appendix 7 for the type and asbestos content; and Appendix 3 for specific location and condition of these ACMs.
6.2 Non-Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials
During the assessment, non-friable ACMs were not identified by laboratory analysis to be present at the subject facility.
6.3 Presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials
Presumed asbestos-containing materials were observed to be present at the subject facility. The following materials were identified but not sampled:
Window and door caulking materials;
Roof caulking materials;
Roofing materials;
Mastics; and,
Chalkboards.
These materials were not sampled during the assessment to avoid damage. The materials were observed to be in good condition. As these materials are known to have been manufactured with asbestos, they should be presumed to be asbestos-containing unless proven otherwise by laboratory analysis.
6.4 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials Refer to Appendix 2 for a list of materials identified as non-asbestos containing through sampling and laboratory analysis.
![Page 10: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 6
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on visual assessment and laboratory analysis, Jacques Whitford recommends the following with regards to the ACMs and PACMs in the facility assessed:
Prior to demolition or renovation work, undertake testing of presumed asbestos-containing materials to determine their asbestos content;
Asbestos-containing materials should be removed prior to the start of renovation work that may impact the material, in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05; and,
Should a material suspected to contain asbestos fibres become uncovered during demolition or renovation activities, all work in the areas that may disturb the material should be stopped. Samples of the suspect material should be submitted for laboratory analysis to determine if asbestos fibres are present. Confirmed asbestos materials should be handled in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05.
8.0 CLOSURE This report has been prepared for the sole benefit of the Toronto Catholic District School Board. The report may not be used by any other person or entity without the express written consent of Jacques Whitford Limited and the Toronto Catholic District School Board.
Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on decisions based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. Jacques Whitford Limited accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report.
The information and conclusions contained in this report are based upon work undertaken by trained professional and technical staff in accordance with generally accepted engineering and scientific practices current at the time the work was performed. Conclusions presented in this report should not be construed as legal advice.
The conclusions presented in this report represent the best technical judgment of Jacques Whitford Limited based on the data obtained from the work. The conclusions are based on the site conditions encountered by Jacques Whitford Limited at the time the work was performed at the specific assessment and/or sampling locations, and can only be extrapolated to an undefined limited area around these locations. The extent of the limited area depends on building construction and conditions, weather, building usage and other factors. Due to the nature of the investigation and the limited data available, Jacques Whitford Limited cannot warrant against undiscovered environmental liabilities.
If any conditions become apparent that differ significantly from our understanding of conditions as presented in this report, we request that we be notified immediately to reassess the conclusions provided herein.
![Page 11: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 7
We trust that the above is satisfactory for your purposes at this time. Should you have any questions or concerns, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at your convenience.
This report was prepared by Menaka Yogendrarajah and reviewed by Martin Ling and Steven D. Fulford.
Sincerely,
JACQUES WHITFORD LIMITED
Original Signature on File Original Signature on File Menaka Yogendrarajah Steven D. Fulford Report Author Senior Technical Reviewer Original Signature on File Martin Ling Project Manager Enclosures P:\CMiC Jobs\1025xxx\1025760\REPORTS\549 - Bishop Allen Academy\549_Bishop Allen Academy Final Report.docx
![Page 12: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
APPENDIX 1 Floor Plans Showing Locations of
Asbestos-Containing Materials
![Page 13: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
APPENDIX 2 Summary of Results of Analysis of Bulk Samples
for Asbestos Content
![Page 16: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Summary of Bulk Sample Analysis for Asbestos Type and Content
SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled
MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location
549-BS-01A None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with brown specks
RM 112
549-BS-01B None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with brown specks
RM 125
549-BS-01C None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with brown specks
RM 125A
549-BS-02A None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - pink with pattern
RM 148C
549-BS-02B None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - pink with pattern
RM 148C
549-BS-02C None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - pink with pattern
RM 148C
549-BS-03A None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - blue with blue and white flecks
RM 123
549-BS-03B None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - blue with blue and white flecks
RM 161
549-BS-03C None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - blue with blue and white flecks
RM 111
549-BS-04A None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey flecks
RM 118A
549-BS-04B None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey flecks
RM 117
549-BS-04C None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey flecks
RM 119
549-BS-05A None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with black flecks
RM 107A
549-BS-05B None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with black flecks
RM 115
549-BS-05C None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - white with black flecks
RM 107
549-BS-06A None Detected PLMLinoleum sheet flooring - brownRM 109
PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)
1
Notes:
04-Jun-08
![Page 17: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled
MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location
549-BS-06B None Detected PLMLinoleum sheet flooring - brownRM 111
549-BS-06C None Detected PLMLinoleum sheet flooring - brownRM 118
549-BS-07A None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRM 102
549-BS-07B None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRM 103
549-BS-07C None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRM 107
549-BS-07D None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRM 108
549-BS-07E None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRM 113
549-BS-07F None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRM 111
549-BS-07G None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRM 148D
549-BS-08A None Detected PLM2'x6' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern
RM 125D
549-BS-08B None Detected PLM2'x6' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern
RM 125F
549-BS-08C None Detected PLM2'x6' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern
RM 103
549-BS-09A None Detected PLM2'x4' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern
RM 108
549-BS-09B None Detected PLM2'x4' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern
RM 107
549-BS-09C None Detected PLM2'x4' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern
RM 102
549-BS-10A None Detected PLM2'x4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern
RM 105A
549-BS-10B None Detected PLM2'x4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern
RM 105
PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)
2
Notes:
04-Jun-08
![Page 18: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled
MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location
549-BS-10C None Detected PLM2'x4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern
RM 203
549-BS-11A None Detected PLM2'x6' acoustical ceiling tile - small pinhole pattern
RM 100
549-BS-11B None Detected PLM2'x6' acoustical ceiling tile - small pinhole pattern
RM 129
549-BS-11C None Detected PLM2'x6' acoustical ceiling tile - small pinhole pattern
RM 161B
549-BS-12A None Detected PLMPlasterRM 104
549-BS-12B None Detected PLMPlasterRM 104
549-BS-12C None Detected PLMPlasterRM 111
549-BS-12D None Detected PLMPlasterRM 111
549-BS-12E None Detected PLMPlasterRM 106
549-BS-12F None Detected PLMPlasterRM 106
549-BS-12G None Detected PLMPlasterRM 107
549-BS-13A None Detected PLMSprayed fireproofingRM 108
549-BS-13B None Detected PLMSprayed fireproofingRM 105
549-BS-13C None Detected PLMSprayed fireproofingRM 104A
549-BS-13D None Detected PLMSprayed fireproofingRM 100
549-BS-13E None Detected PLMSprayed fireproofingRM 125
549-BS-13F None Detected PLMSprayed fireproofingRM 126
PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)
3
Notes:
04-Jun-08
![Page 19: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled
MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location
549-BS-13G None Detected PLMSprayed fireproofingRM 126
549-BS-14A None Detected PLMLinoleum sheet flooring - white with pink and grey specks
RM 112
549-BS-14B None Detected PLMLinoleum sheet flooring - white with pink and grey specks
RM 113
549-BS-14C None Detected PLMLinoleum sheet flooring - white with pink and grey specks
RM 113
549-BS-15A None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - pink with pink smears
RM 125B
549-BS-15B None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - pink with pink smears
RM 125B
549-BS-15C None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - pink with pink smears
RM 125B
549-BS-16A None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl sheet flooring - green with green smears
RM 126
549-BS-16B None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl sheet flooring - green with green smears
RM 127
549-BS-16C None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl sheet flooring - green with green smears
RM 127
549-BS-17A None Detected PLMVinyl sheet flooring - greenRM 145A
549-BS-17B None Detected PLMVinyl sheet flooring - greenRM 145A
549-BS-17C None Detected PLMVinyl sheet flooring - greenRM 145A
549-BS-18A None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - yellow with green and white specks
RM 105
549-BS-18B None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - yellow with green and white specks
RM 105
549-BS-18C None Detected PLM12"x12" vinyl floor tile - yellow with green and white specks
RM 105
549-BS-19A None Detected PLMVinyl sheet flooring - brownRM 144
PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)
4
Notes:
04-Jun-08
![Page 20: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled
MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location
549-BS-19B None Detected PLMVinyl sheet flooring - brownRM 144
549-BS-19C None Detected PLMVinyl sheet flooring - brownRM 144
PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)
5
Notes:
04-Jun-08
![Page 21: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
APPENDIX 3 Summary of Occurrences of Asbestos
Containing Materials
![Page 22: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Summary of Occurrences of Asbestos-Containing Materials
RoomSpecificLocation
ACM Type EstimatedQuantity
SampleNumber
OriginalSample?
Asbestos Content
Friable?Visible?
Access. Comments/Notes
ACMConditionLevel
ACMLocation
insulating cement on pipe fitting 5-10 ns No 57% Chrysotile Yes Yes B good ACM as identified in
SAP Inventory
129 mechanicalbelow ceiling1
insulating cement on pipe fitting 10 ns No 40-50% Chrysotile Yes Yes C good ACM as identified in
SAP Inventory
130 mechanicalabove ceiling1
insulating cement on pipe fitting 15 ns No 40-50% Chrysotile Yes Yes B good ACM as identified in
SAP Inventory
131 mechanicalbelow ceiling1
insulating cement on pipe fitting nq ns No 40-50% Chrysotile Yes No D unknown (PACM)
Could not confirm
presence or quantity due to application of
sprayed fireproofing
145A mechanicalabove ceiling1
insulating cement on pipe fitting nq ns No ns Yes No D unknown (PACM)
Could not confirm
presence or quantity due to
solid ceiling
147 mechanicalabove ceiling1
insulating cement on pipe fitting 5 ns No 57% Chrysotile Yes Yes C good ACM148 mechanicalbelow ceiling1
insulating cement on pipe fitting 15-17 ns No 57% Chrysotile Yes Yes B good ACM as identified in
SAP Inventory
153 mechanicalbelow ceiling1
Yes - Suspect material is visible without opening hatches or lifting ceiling tiles No - Suspect material can only be viewed if access hatches are opened or ceiling tiles lifted.
A - Areas of the building within reach (from floor level) of all building usersB - Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladderC - Areas of the building above 2.4 m where use of a ladder is required to reach the asbestosD - Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc., where demolition of the ceiling, wall, or equipment, etc., is required to reach the asbestos
Accessibility Classification
Visibility
Notes: ACM - asbestos-containing material PACM - presumed asbestos-containing material Access. - accessibility nq - not quantified na - not applicable ns - not sampled REF - reference sample x - estimated number of units F - friable NF - non friable PFM - potentialy friable material S - Sample (original sample collected) V - Visually identical sample
1
* Based on a non-intrusive inspection of visible surfaces within the room space.
04-Jun-08
![Page 23: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
RoomSpecificLocation
ACM Type EstimatedQuantity
SampleNumber
OriginalSample?
Asbestos Content
Friable?Visible?
Access. Comments/Notes
ACMConditionLevel
ACMLocation
insulating cement on pipe fitting 15-20 ns No 57% Chrysotile Yes Yes A good ACM as identified in
SAP inventory
159 mechanicalbelow ceiling1
insulating cement on pipe fitting 2 ns No 57% Chrysotile Yes No C good ACM as identified in
SAP inventory
227 mechanicalabove ceiling2
Yes - Suspect material is visible without opening hatches or lifting ceiling tiles No - Suspect material can only be viewed if access hatches are opened or ceiling tiles lifted.
A - Areas of the building within reach (from floor level) of all building usersB - Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladderC - Areas of the building above 2.4 m where use of a ladder is required to reach the asbestosD - Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc., where demolition of the ceiling, wall, or equipment, etc., is required to reach the asbestos
Accessibility Classification
Visibility
Notes: ACM - asbestos-containing material PACM - presumed asbestos-containing material Access. - accessibility nq - not quantified na - not applicable ns - not sampled REF - reference sample x - estimated number of units F - friable NF - non friable PFM - potentialy friable material S - Sample (original sample collected) V - Visually identical sample
2
* Based on a non-intrusive inspection of visible surfaces within the room space.
04-Jun-08
![Page 24: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
APPENDIX 4 Laboratory Analytical Report – Asbestos:
Polarized Light Microscopy
![Page 25: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
180702726
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM
1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 1/3/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]
549-BS-01A180702726-0001
Rm 112, 12x12 VFT - White w/Brown Specks
White None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-01B180702726-0002
Rm 125, 12x12 VFT - White w/Brown Specks
White None Detected
Non-FibrousLayers: 3
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-01C180702726-0003
Rm 125A, 12x12 VFT - White w/Brown Specks
White None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-02A180702726-0004
Rm 148C, 12x12 VFT - Pink w/Pattern
Various None Detected
Non-FibrousLayers: 3
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-02B180702726-0005
Rm 148C, 12x12 VFT - Pink w/Pattern
Various None Detected
Non-FibrousLayers: 3
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-02C180702726-0006
Rm 148C, 12x12 VFT - Pink w/Pattern
Various None Detected
Non-FibrousLayers: 3
Cellulose2% Non-fibrous (other)98%
549-BS-03A180702726-0007
Rm 123, 12x12 VFT - Blue w/Blue-White Flecks
Blue None Detected
Non-FibrousLayers: 2
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-03B180702726-0008
Rm 161, 12x12 VFT - Blue w/Blue-White Flecks
Blue None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
1
R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)
Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)
![Page 26: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
180702726
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM
1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 1/3/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]
549-BS-03C180702726-0009
Rm 111, 12x12 VFT - Blue w/Blue-White Flecks
Blue None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-04A180702726-0010
Rm 118A, 12x12 VFT - White w/Gray Flecks
White None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-04B180702726-0011
Rm 117, 12x12 VFT - White w/Gray Flecks
White None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-04C180702726-0012
Rm 119, 12x12 VFT - White w/Gray Flecks
White None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-05A180702726-0013
Rm 107A, 12x12 VFT - White w/Black Flecks
White None Detected
Non-FibrousLayers: 2
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-05B180702726-0014
Rm 115, 12x12 VFT - White w/Black Flecks
White None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-05C180702726-0015
Rm 107, 12x12 VFT - White w/Black Flecks
White None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-06A180702726-0016
Rm 109, Linoleum Sheet Flooring - Brown
Beige None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
2
R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)
Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)
![Page 27: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
180702726
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM
1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 1/3/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]
549-BS-06B180702726-0017
Rm 111, Linoleum Sheet Flooring - Brown
Beige None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-06C180702726-0018
Rm 118, Linoleum Sheet Flooring - Brown
Beige None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-07A180702726-0019
Rm 102, Drywall Joint-Fill Compound
White None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-07B180702726-0020
Rm 103, Drywall Joint-Fill Compound
White None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-07C180702726-0021
Rm 107, Drywall Joint-Fill Compound
White None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-07D180702726-0022
Rm 108, Drywall Joint-Fill Compound
White None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-07E180702726-0023
Rm 113, Drywall Joint-Fill Compound
White None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-07F180702726-0024
Rm 111, Drywall Joint-Fill Compound
White None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
3
R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)
Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)
![Page 28: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
180702726
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM
1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 1/3/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]
549-BS-07G180702726-0025
Rm 148D, Drywall Joint-Fill Compound
White None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-08A180702726-0026
Rm 125D, 2'x6' Acoust. CT, Sm. Fiss. Pin. Pattern
Various None Detected
FibrousLayers: 2
Cellulose25%Min. Wool20%
Non-fibrous (other)55%
549-BS-08B180702726-0027
Rm 125F, 2'x6' Acoust. CT, Sm. Fiss. Pin. Pattern
Beige None Detected
FibrousHomogeneous
Cellulose45%Min. Wool5%
Non-fibrous (other)50%
549-BS-08C180702726-0028
Rm 103, 2'x6' Acoust. CT, Sm. Fiss. Pin. Pattern
Beige None Detected
FibrousHomogeneous
Cellulose50%Glass2%
Non-fibrous (other)48%
549-BS-09A180702726-0029
Rm 108, 2'x4' Acoust. CT, Sm. Fiss. Pin. Pattern
Beige None Detected
FibrousHomogeneous
Cellulose30%Min. Wool30%
Non-fibrous (other)40%
549-BS-09B180702726-0030
Rm 107, 2'x4' Acoust. CT, Sm. Fiss. Pin. Pattern
Beige None Detected
FibrousHomogeneous
Cellulose30%Min. Wool25%
Non-fibrous (other)45%
549-BS-09C180702726-0031
Rm 102, 2'x4' Acoust. CT, Sm. Fiss. Pin. Pattern
Beige None Detected
FibrousHeterogeneous
Cellulose30%Min. Wool15%
Non-fibrous (other)55%
549-BS-10A180702726-0032
Rm 105A, 2'x4' Acoust. CT, Med. Fiss. Pin. Pattern
Beige None Detected
FibrousHomogeneous
Cellulose25%Min. Wool20%
Non-fibrous (other)55%
4
R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)
Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)
![Page 29: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
180702726
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM
1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 1/3/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]
549-BS-10B180702726-0033
Rm 105, 2'x4' Acoust. CT, Med. Fiss. Pin. Pattern
Beige None Detected
FibrousHomogeneous
Cellulose30%Min. Wool15%
Non-fibrous (other)55%
549-BS-10C180702726-0034
Rm 203, 2'x4' Acoust. CT, Med. Fiss. Pin. Pattern
Beige None Detected
FibrousHeterogeneous
Cellulose30%Min. Wool15%
Non-fibrous (other)55%
549-BS-11A180702726-0035
Rm 100, 2'x6' Acoust. CT, Small Pinhole Pattern
Various None Detected
FibrousLayers: 2
Cellulose20%Min. Wool40%
Non-fibrous (other)40%
549-BS-11B180702726-0036
Rm 129, 2'x6' Acoust. CT, Small Pinhole Pattern
Various None Detected
FibrousLayers: 2
Cellulose20%Min. Wool40%
Non-fibrous (other)40%
549-BS-11C180702726-0037
Rm 161B, 2'x6' Acoust. CT, Small Pinhole Pattern
Various None Detected
FibrousLayers: 2
Cellulose25%Min. Wool35%
Non-fibrous (other)40%
549-BS-12A180702726-0038
Rm 104, Plaster Various None Detected
Non-FibrousLayers: 2
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-12B180702726-0039
Rm 104, Plaster Various None Detected
Non-FibrousLayers: 2
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-12C180702726-0040
Rm 111, Plaster White None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
5
R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)
Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)
![Page 30: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
180702726
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM
1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 1/3/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]
549-BS-12D180702726-0041
Rm 111, Plaster White None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-12E180702726-0042
Rm 106, Plaster White None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-12F180702726-0043
Rm 106, Plaster White None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-12G180702726-0044
Rm 107, Plaster White None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-13A180702726-0045
Rm 108, Spray-on Fireproofing
Beige None Detected
FibrousHeterogeneous
Cellulose40% Non-fibrous (other)60%
549-BS-13B180702726-0046
Rm 105, Spray-on Fireproofing
Grayish None Detected
FibrousHomogeneous
Cellulose33% Non-fibrous (other)67%
549-BS-13C180702726-0047
Rm 104A, Spray-on Fireproofing
Grayish None Detected
FibrousHomogeneous
Cellulose40% Non-fibrous (other)60%
549-BS-13D180702726-0048
Rm 100, Spray-on Fireproofing
Beige None Detected
FibrousHomogeneous
Cellulose33% Non-fibrous (other)67%
6
R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)
Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)
![Page 31: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
180702726
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM
1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 1/3/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]
549-BS-13E180702726-0049
Rm 125, Spray-on Fireproofing
White None Detected
FibrousHeterogeneous
Min. Wool85% Non-fibrous (other)15%
549-BS-13F180702726-0050
Rm 126, Spray-on Fireproofing
White None Detected
FibrousHeterogeneous
Min. Wool85% Non-fibrous (other)15%
549-BS-13G180702726-0051
Rm 126, Spray-on Fireproofing
White None Detected
FibrousHeterogeneous
Min. Wool85% Non-fibrous (other)15%
549-BS-14A180702726-0052
Rm 112, Linol. Sheet Flr, White w/Pink-Gray Specks
Various None Detected
FibrousLayers: 3
Cellulose4%Glass4%Synthetic4%
Non-fibrous (other)88%
549-BS-14B180702726-0053
Rm 113, Linol. Sheet Flr, White w/Pink-Gray Specks
Various None Detected
FibrousLayers: 3
Cellulose5%Glass5%Synthetic5%
Non-fibrous (other)85%
549-BS-14C180702726-0054
Rm 113, Linol. Sheet Flr, White w/Pink-Gray Specks
Various None Detected
FibrousLayers: 3
Cellulose10%Glass2%Synthetic5%
Non-fibrous (other)83%
549-BS-15A180702726-0055
Rm 125B, 12x12 VFT, Pink w/Pink Smears
Pink None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
7
R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)
Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)
![Page 32: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
180702726
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM
1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 1/3/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]
549-BS-15B180702726-0056
Rm 125B, 12x12 VFT, Pink w/Pink Smears
Pink None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-15C180702726-0057
Rm 125B, 12x12 VFT, Pink w/Pink Smears
Pink None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-16A180702726-0058
Rm 126, 12x12 VFT, Green w/Green Smears
Green None Detected
Non-FibrousLayers: 2
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-16B180702726-0059
Rm 127, 12x12 VFT, Green w/Green Smears
Green None Detected
Non-FibrousLayers: 2
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-16C180702726-0060
Rm 127, 12x12 VFT, Green w/Green Smears
Green None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-17A180702726-0061
Rm 145A, Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Green
Various None Detected
Non-FibrousLayers: 3
Glass2% Non-fibrous (other)98%
549-BS-17B180702726-0062
Rm 145A, Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Green
Various None Detected
Non-FibrousLayers: 3
Glass2% Non-fibrous (other)98%
549-BS-17C180702726-0063
Rm 145A, Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Green
Various None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Glass3% Non-fibrous (other)97%
8
R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)
Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)
![Page 33: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
180702726
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760, #985Received: 12/20/07 12:01 PM
1025760/ Bishop Allen Academy
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:1/2/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 1/3/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.521 Plymouth Road, Suite 107, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462Phone: (610) 828-3102 Fax: (610) 828-3122 Email: [email protected]
549-BS-18A180702726-0064
Rm 105, 12x12 VFT, Yellow w/Green-White Specks
Yellow None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-18B180702726-0065
Rm 105, 12x12 VFT, Yellow w/Green-White Specks
Yellow None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-18C180702726-0066
Rm 105, 12x12 VFT, Yellow w/Green-White Specks
Yellow None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-19A180702726-0067
Rm 144, Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Brown
Tan None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-19B180702726-0068
Rm 144, Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Brown
Tan None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
549-BS-19C180702726-0069
Rm 144, Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Brown
Tan None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
Layers were combined prior to analysis at client's request.
9
R. Privette, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Plymouth Meeting (NVLAP #200699-0)
Angela Yohn-Goodling (44)Robert Privette (25)
![Page 34: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
APPENDIX 5 Evaluation Criteria for Assessing Asbestos
Containing Materials
![Page 35: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 Appendix 5-1
Criteria for Assessing Asbestos Containing Materials
A description of the criteria used in evaluating the condition, accessibility and exposure risk of asbestos-containing materials is provided below. The criteria is generally based on the Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) document entitled “Deputy Ministers Directive 057 – Asbestos Management” (Last Revised 1999/07/16) and industry standards of practice.
Assessment of Condition
Spray Applied Fireproofing, Insulation and Textured Finishes
In evaluating the condition of ACM spray applied as fireproofing, thermal insulation or texture, decorative or acoustic finishes, the following criteria apply:
Good
Surface of material shows no significant signs of damage, deterioration or delamination. Up to one percent visible damage to surface is allowed within range of GOOD. Evaluation of sprayed fireproofing requires the Assessor to be familiar with the irregular surface texture typical of sprayed asbestos products. GOOD condition includes unencapsulated or unpainted fireproofing or texture finishes, where no delamination or damage is observed, and encapsulated fireproofing or texture finishes where the encapsulation has been applied after the damage or fallout occurred.
Poor
Sprayed materials show signs of damage, delamination or deterioration. More than one percent damage to surface of ACM spray.
In observation areas, where damage exists in isolated locations, both GOOD and POOR condition may be reported. The extent or percentage of each condition will be recorded on the Assessor reassessment form.
FAIR condition is not utilized or considered as a valid criterion in the evaluation of sprayed fireproofing, sprayed insulation, or texture coat finishes.
The evaluation of ACM spray applied as fireproofing, non-mechanical thermal insulation, or texture, decorative or acoustic finishes which are present above ceilings, may be limited by the number of observations made, and by building components such as ducts or full height walls that obstruct the above ceiling observations. Persons entering the ceiling area are advised to be watchful for ACM DEBRIS prior to accessing or working above ceilings in areas of building with ACM, regardless of the reported condition.
Other ACM
In evaluating the condition of mechanical insulation (on boilers, breaching, ductwork, piping, tanks, equipment etc.) the following criteria are used:
![Page 36: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 Appendix 5-2
Good
Insulation is completely covered in jacketing and exhibits no evidence of damage or deterioration. No insulation is exposed. Includes conditions where the jacketing has minor surface damage (i.e., scuffs or stains), but the jacketing is not penetrated.
Fair
Minor penetration damage to jacketed insulation (cuts, tears, nicks, deterioration or delamination) or undamaged insulation that has never been jacketed. Insulation is exposed but not showing surface disintegration. The extent of missing insulation ranges should be minor to none.
Poor
Original insulation jacket is missing, damaged, deteriorated or delaminated. Insulation is exposed and significant areas have been dislodged. Damage cannot be readily repaired. The evaluation of mechanical insulation may be limited by the number of observations made and building components such as ducts or full height walls that obstruct observations. In these circumstances, it is not possible to observe each foot of mechanical insulation from all angles.
Non-Friable and Potentially Friable Materials
Non-friable materials generally have little potential to release airborne fibres, even when damaged by mechanical breakage. However, some non-friable materials, i.e., exterior asbestos cement products, may have deteriorated so that the binder no longer effectively contains the asbestos fibres. In such cases of significantly deteriorated non-friable material, the material will be treated as a friable product.
Evaluation of Accessibility
The accessibility of building materials known or suspected of being ACM is rated according to the following criteria:
Access (A)
Areas of the building within reach of all building users. Includes areas such as gymnasiums, workshops, and storage areas where activities of the building users may result in disturbance of ACM not normally within reach from floor level.
Access (B)
Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladder. Includes: frequently entered pipe chases, tunnels and service areas or areas within reach from a fixed ladder or catwalk, i.e., tops of equipment, mezzanines.
Access (C) Exposed
Areas of the building above 8'0" where use of a ladder is required to reach the ACM. Only refers to ACM materials that are exposed to view, from the floor or ladder, without removing or opening other building components such as ceiling tiles, or service access doors or hatches. Does not include infrequently accessed service areas of the building.
![Page 37: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 Appendix 5-3
Access (C) Concealed
Areas of the building which require the removal of a building component, including lay-in ceilings and access panels into solid ceiling systems. Includes rarely entered crawl spaces, attic spaces, etc. Observations are limited to the extent visible from the access points.
Access (D)
Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc. where demolition of the ceiling, wall or equipment, etc., is required to reach the ACM. Evaluation of the condition and extent of ACM is limited or impossible, depending on the Assessor's ability to visually examine the materials In Access D.
![Page 38: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
APPENDIX 6 Terms and Definitions
![Page 39: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 June 4, 2008 Appendix 6-1
Terms and Definitions
Asbestos
Any of the following asbestiform silicate minerals: actinolite asbestos, anthophyllite asbestos, chrysotile, crocidolite, cumming tonite-grunerite asbestos (amosite), tremolite asbestos with a dry weight concentration greater than 0.5%.
Friable
Capable of being crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure.
HEPA Filter
A high efficiency particulate aerosol filter that is at least 99.97 per cent efficient in collecting a 0.3 micrometre aerosol.
Homogeneous Material
A material that is uniform in colour and texture
Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)
Polarized Light Microscopy is a technique accepted by the US Environmental Protection Agency as a screening method for detecting asbestos fibres in bulk material samples.
Presumed Asbestos Containing Materials (PACMs)
Materials that are known to have been manufactured contain asbestos. Testing of the material is required to determine if the material contains asbestos fibres.
Recommended Corrective Actions (RCAs)
Areas identified to consist of asbestos-containing or presumed asbestos-containing materials that require attention to repair or remove damaged materials.
Building
Any structure, vault, chamber or tunnel including, without limitation, the electrical, plumbing, heating and air handling equipment (including rigid duct work) of the structure, vault, chamber or tunnel.
![Page 40: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
APPENDIX 7 Summary of Results of Analysis of Bulk Samples
- SAP inventory
![Page 41: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
![Page 42: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
![Page 43: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
![Page 44: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
![Page 45: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
![Page 46: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
![Page 47: 549 Bishop Allen Academy Final Report · PROJECT NO. 1025760 . PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board 80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081408/605d4e3a3339af065a19a786/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)