5 years results: endovenous treatment of superficial vein ... · EVLA: Endovenous Laser Ablation...
Transcript of 5 years results: endovenous treatment of superficial vein ... · EVLA: Endovenous Laser Ablation...
5 years results: endovenous treatment of superficial vein reflux in an outpatient setting
Insoo Park, M.D. Charm varicose vein surgery clinic
Seoul, Korea
ENDOVENOUS TREATMENT
: 5 YEARS RESULTS?
EVLA (Endovenous laser ablation)
RFA (Radiofrequency ablation) - Radiofrequency segmental thermal ablation
RADIOFREQUENCY SEGMENTAL THERMAL ABLATION
: CLINICAL DESCRIPTION
The RFA ClosureFast™ system,
delivers radiofrequency energy in a controlled fashion
segments of veins causing denaturation of the collagen
contraction of the vessel
no blood can flow through it
7 cm
3 cm
EVOLUTION OF CLOSUREFAST™ TECHNOLOGY
FDA cleared Closure™ System
1995 1999 2006 2009 2015
VNUS Medical Technologies Founded
Covidien acquires VNUS Medical Technologies
Medtronic acquires Covidien
2014
FDA approval ClosureFast™ System (segmental ablation)
FDA approval ClosureRFG™ Generator (RFG3)
FDA cleared ClosureRFS™ Stylet
2005
RADIOFREQUENCY SEGMENTAL THERMAL ABLATION
: LONG TERM STUDY
ClosureFAST study Multicenter, prospective, 5 years f/u
Alan Dietzek. Veith Symposium New York City; November 19, 2013
Rassumussen study Multicenter, randomized, 3 years f/u
Rasmussen LH, et al., J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord Oct2013;349-356.
Proebstle study Multicenter, prospective, 5 years f/u
TM Proebstle , et al., BJS 2015 Feb;102(3):212-8
Dietzek A. RF Segmental ablation: 5-year data. Annual Symposium on Vascular and Endovascular Issues, Techniques, Horizons (Veith Symposium) New York City; November 19, 2013
CLOSUREFAST STUDY
Study Features:
International multi-center study (8 Europe, 5 US)
Prospective, longitudinal, single arm
326 patients and 396 limbs treated
278 limbs followed to 5 years (70.2%)
Dietzek A. RF Segmental ablation: 5-year data. Annual VEITH Symposium New York City ; November 19, 2013
: Dietzek A et al. 2013
Primary Endpoints
Vein occlusion rate
Absence of reflux rate
Secondary Endpoints
Presence of complications and side effects
Quality of life (QOL)
Dietzek A. RF Segmental ablation: 5-year data. Annual VEITH Symposium New York City ; November 19, 2013
CLOSUREFAST STUDY : Dietzek A et al. 2013
BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS
Enrolled Subjects (N=326)
Age mean (SD)
Age range
50.8 (13.3)
18 - 79 years
Gender 73.3% Female
26.7% Male
BMI mean (SD)
BMI range
26.5 (5.6)
16.2 - 48.5
BMI = Body mass index
Dietzek A. RF Segmental ablation: 5-year data. Annual VEITH Symposium New York City ; November 19, 2013
CLOSUREFAST STUDY : Dietzek A et al. 2013
OCCLUSION RATES AT 1 & 5 YEARS
90.0% success at 5 years
96.6% success at 1 year
Dietzek A. RF Segmental ablation: 5-year data. Annual VEITH Symposium New York City ; November 19, 2013
CLOSUREFAST STUDY : Dietzek A et al. 2013
OCCLUSION & REFLUX FREE RATES
Time
Occlusion Rates %* Std Error
1 Year 96.6% 0.9%
2 Year 94.3% 1.2%
3 Year 92.8% 1.4%
4 Year 91.1% 1.5%
5 Year 90.0% 1.7%
*Product limit occlusion estimates.
Dietzek A. RF Segmental ablation: 5-year data. Annual VEITH Symposium New York City ; November 19, 2013
CLOSUREFAST STUDY : Dietzek A et al. 2013
Time
Reflux free Rates %* td Error
1 Year 98.9% 0.5%
2 Year 97.8% 0.8%
3 Year 95.7% 1.1%
4 Year 94.0% 1.3%
5 Year 93.7% 1.3%
RASMUSSEN STUDY
Study Features :
Randomized, prospective trial, two sites Denmark
500 subjects (580 legs)
Patients assessed at 3, 30 and 1 & 3 years (intended 5 year follow-up)
Compared 4 treatments : EVLA (980 nm and 1470 nm) – 125(144)
RFA ClosureFast™ catheter – 125(148)
Ultrasound guided sclerotherapy (UGSF) – 125(144)
Surgical stripping – 124(142)
Rasmussen LH et al., Randomized clinical trial comparing EVLA, RFA, FS, and stripping for GSV with 3 yr follow-up. J VS Venous Lymphat Disord 2013;349-356.
: Rasmussen et al. 2013
Primary endpoint Closed or absent GSV
(Refluxing segment 10cm or more considered failure)
Secondary endpoints Presence of varicose veins, reoperations, VCSS and QOL
Rasmussen LH et al., Randomized clinical trial comparing EVLA, RFA, FS, and stripping for GSV with 3 yr follow-up. J VS Venous Lymphat Disord 2013;349-356.
RASMUSSEN STUDY : Rasmussen et al. 2013
EVLA: Endovenous Laser Ablation 980-nm diode laser 17 legs & 1470nm diode laser 127 leg,;GSV, Great Saphenous Vein; RFA, Radiofrequency Ablations;
USGS, Ultrasound-guided Foam Sclerotherapy.
RASMUSSEN STUDY
Rasmussen LH et al., Randomized clinical trial comparing EVLA, RFA, FS, and stripping for GSV with 3 yr follow-up. J VS Venous Lymphat Disord 2013;349-356.
RASMUSSEN STUDY BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS
RFA EVLA UGFS Stripping
No. of patients 125 125 125 124
No. of legs 148 144 144 142
Bilateral 23 19 19 18
Age (range) 51 (23-77) 52 (18-74) 51 (18-75) 50 (19-72)
Female (% ) 70 72 76 77
CEAP C2-C3 (%) 92 95 96 97
CEAP C4-C6 (%) 8 5 4 3
EVLA: Endovenous Laser Ablation 980-nm diode laser 17 legs & 1470nm diode laser 127 leg,;GSV, Great Saphenous Vein; RFA, Radiofrequency Ablations;
USGS, Ultrasound-guided Foam Sclerotherapy.
: Rasmussen et al. 2013
Rasmussen LH et al., Randomized clinical trial comparing EVLA, RFA, FS, and stripping for GSV with 3 yr follow-up. J VS Venous Lymphat Disord 2013;349-356.
OPEN OR REFLUXING GSV’S
Kaplan-Meier (KM) plot of reoperations. The KM figures represent time to the event.
Treatment Number %
RFA 8 7%
EVLA 8 6.8%
UGFS 31 26.4%
stripping 8 6.5%
EVLA: Endovenous Laser Ablation ;GSV, Great Saphenous Vein; RFA, Radiofrequency Ablations; USGS, Ultrasound-guided Foam Sclerotherapy.
RASMUSSEN STUDY : Rasmussen et al. 2013
Rasmussen LH et al., Randomized clinical trial comparing EVLA, RFA, FS, and stripping for GSV with 3 yr follow-up. J VS Venous Lymphat Disord 2013;349-356.
VCSS (Venous Clinical Severity Score) :
Improved significantly in all groups (p<.0001), no significant difference between
groups at any given point in time and continued throughout the 3 year follow-up.
AVVSS (Aberdeen Varicose Vein Symptom Severity Score)
Improved significantly in all groups from day 3 through year 3 (p<.0001), no significant
difference between groups throughout.
SF-36 Scores (Quality of Life)
Significant improvements made over baseline in the following categories; physical,
bodily pain, vitality, and social functioning, in addition to emotional and physical
component summary in all groups at all times.
: Rasmussen et al. 2013
RASMUSSEN STUDY
Rasmussen LH et al., Randomized clinical trial comparing EVLA, RFA, FS, and stripping for GSV with 3 yr follow-up. J VS Venous Lymphat Disord 2013;349-356.
PROEBSTLE STUDY
Study Features: European multi-center (8 sites in Germany, France)
Prospective, cohort study
Between April 2006 ~ March 2007
225 patients and 295 limbs treated
177 patients and 236 limbs followed to 5 years (78.7%)
: Proebstle et al., 2015
Proebstle et al., 5 yr results from the proepective European multicenter cohort study in RF segmental thermal ablation for incompetent GSV BJS 2015 Feb;102(3):212-8
PROEBSTLE STUDY : Proebstle et al., 2015
Primary endpoint : Vein occlusion
Absence of flow in the treated vein using distal augmentation
Secondary endpoints : CEAP, VCSS, VAS for pain, complications etc.
Proebstle et al., 5 yr results from the proepective European multicenter cohort study in RF segmental thermal ablation for incompetent GSV BJS 2015 Feb;102(3):212-8
PROEBSTLE STUDY : Proebstle et al., 2015
Mean diameters
of GSV 3cm distal
to the SFJ
Not visible in 53.4% at 5
years
Fibrotic cord mean 2.0mm (preOP mean 5.8mm)
Proebstle et al., 5 yr results from the proepective European multicenter cohort study in RF segmental thermal ablation for incompetent GSV BJS 2015 Feb;102(3):212-8
PROEBSTLE STUDY : Proebstle et al., 2015
GSV occlusion rate
at 5 years : 91.9%
(complete occlusion with
absence of any reflux up to
3cm below SFJ)
Proebstle et al., 5 yr results from the proepective European multicenter cohort study in RF segmental thermal ablation for incompetent GSV BJS 2015 Feb;102(3):212-8
PROEBSTLE STUDY : Proebstle et al., 2015
VCSS
Baseline mean 3.9(2.1)
reaching 1.3(1.7) at 5 years
Proebstle et al., 5 yr results from the proepective European multicenter cohort study in RF segmental thermal ablation for incompetent GSV BJS 2015 Feb;102(3):212-8
RFA CLOSUREFAST ™ CATHETER : SUMMARY
Occlusion rate :
3-yr follow up 93% (Ramussen et al.)
5-yr follow up 90% / 91.9% (Dietzek / Proebstle et al.)
Significant improvements
: VCSS, AVVSS, SF-36, pain VAS
My experience of RF segmental ablation (ClosureFast™) 1st case on 11 Nov 2014
Subjects (N=291)
Age mean (SD)
Age range
43.3 (15.4)
18 - 76 years
Gender 80.8% Female
19.2% Male
BMI mean
BMI range
23.5 (3.5)
15.8 - 42.7
More than 3 mo
More than 6 mo
More than 1 yr
224 150 50
No. patients
My experience of RF segmental ablation (ClosureFast™) 50 patients reached up 1 year of postop period
32/50 patient followed to 1 year (63.3%)
1 patient showed recanalization by perforators in lower thigh
Occlusion rate 96.8 % at 1 year
Stripping 45%
RFA 28%
EVLA 27%
My procedures