5- Electron Microscopy of Materials.docx

12
 Dr. Saad B. H. Farid Electron Microscopy of Materials 1 |  / /  E lectr on Micr oscopy of M ate r ial s  Microstructur al Analysis Competition between Optical mi cros copy and Scann in g El e ctron M icr os copy SEM  Optical Microscopy 800× 1000×, resolution 10 m  Recent Laser Optical Microscopy, (405 nm Semiconductor Laser) The Confocal laser scanning microscope 17280×, resolution 0.01 m Scanni ng L as e r M i croscop y A dvant ages over SEM : 1. Sample preparation or microscope setup is unnecessary 2. Real-time observation 3. Observation can be made under atmospheric conditions 4. The measurement point is easily identified in the microscope. 5.  Noncontact, nondestructive observation using a laser 6. Large samples can be ac commodated making sample cleaving unnecessary 7. Line roughness and surface roughness analysis with  Noncontact probing allows specim ens to be free of scratches Disadvantage : Limited Magnification and resolution compared with SEM Optical  Microscope  Confocal Higher depth of field 

Transcript of 5- Electron Microscopy of Materials.docx

7/27/2019 5- Electron Microscopy of Materials.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-electron-microscopy-of-materialsdocx 1/11

 Dr. Saad B. H. Farid  Electron Microscopy of Materials 1 | / /  

Electron M icroscopy of Mater ials 

Microstructural Analysis

Competition between Optical microscopy and Scanning Electron M icroscopy SEM

  Optical Microscopy 800× 1000×, resolution 10 m

  Recent Laser Optical Microscopy, (405 nm Semiconductor Laser)

The Confocal laser scanning microscope 17280×, resolution 0.01 m

Scanning Laser M icroscopy 

Advantages over SEM :1.  Sample preparation or microscope setup is unnecessary

2.  Real-time observation

3.  Observation can be made under atmospheric conditions

4.  The measurement point is easily identified in the

microscope.5.  Noncontact, nondestructive observation using a laser 6.  Large samples can be accommodated making sample

cleaving unnecessary

7.  Line roughness and surface roughness analysis with

 Noncontact probing allows specimens to be free of 

scratches

Disadvantage : Limited Magnification and resolution compared with SEM

Optical 

Microscope 

Confocal

Higher depth of field 

7/27/2019 5- Electron Microscopy of Materials.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-electron-microscopy-of-materialsdocx 2/11

 Dr. Saad B. H. Farid  Electron Microscopy of Materials 2 | / /  

S S c c a a n n n n i i n n g g E E l l e e c c t t r r o o n n M M i i c c r r o o s s c c o o p p y y  SSEEMM 

The electron source (or gun) is usually of the tungsten filament thermionic emission type,

although field emission gun (FEG) sources are increasingly being used for higher resolution

(Metal surface subjected to an extremely high electric field >109

V/m). The electrons are

accelerated to energy which is usually between 1keV and 30keV which is considerably lower 

than the energies typical of the TEM (l00 — 300keV). Two or three condenser lenses then de-

magnify the electron beam until, as it hits the specimen, it may have a diameter of only

2  10 nm.

7/27/2019 5- Electron Microscopy of Materials.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-electron-microscopy-of-materialsdocx 3/11

 Dr. Saad B. H. Farid  Electron Microscopy of Materials 3 | / /  

All scanning electron microscopes normally have facilities for detecting secondary electrons  

and backscattered electrons . X-rays are used primarily for chemical analysis rather than

imaging. Auger electrons are of such low energy, and are so easily absorbed that they require

an ultra high vacuum system and specialized equipment for their efficient use. Auger 

spectroscopy and the scanning Auger microscope are important surface analyticaltechniques. Other signals are useful in applications that are more specialized.

Scinti l lator detectors 

These detectors are of the scintillator/light

 pipe/photomultiplier type, and are designed

to maximize the solid angle of collection.

Solid-state detectors When a high-energy electron impinges on a

semiconductor, it produces many electron-

hole pairs, detected by the self-bias

generated by a P —  N junction.

Magnification : typically 20×-106×

Resolution : for modern systems, are typically

- 3.0 nm at 30 kV (SE)

- 4.0 nm at 30 kV (BSE)

- 10.0 nm at 3 kV (SE)Depth of f ield 

Apart from its good spatial resolution, one of 

the most important aspects of the scanning

electron microscope is its large depth of 

field, i.e. the resolution in the z-direction.

Sample preparation for SEM exam 

For effective viewing of a specimen in the

SEM, it is necessary for the surface of thespecimen to be electrically conducting. This

is to increase the electron yield, thus having

adequate brightness.

7/27/2019 5- Electron Microscopy of Materials.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-electron-microscopy-of-materialsdocx 4/11

 Dr. Saad B. H. Farid  Electron Microscopy of Materials 4 | / /  

Few nanometers coating with gold is a general experience to make the sample surface

conductive.

The examination of non-conducting specimens, particularly polymers and biological

materials in the SEM may present other problems, such as specimen degradation by beam

heating, radiation damage, and specimen volatility in the high vacuum. Thus, specialtechniques should be learned by the researcher/technician to overcome this difficulty.

Appli cations of SEM (a Collection) 

1.  Observation of microstructure and topography

2.  Observation of recrystallization, such as recrystallized twins in Cu-Sn (BSE image)

3.  Test of welding cracks

SEI: topography contrast BSEI: Z contrast

7/27/2019 5- Electron Microscopy of Materials.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-electron-microscopy-of-materialsdocx 5/11

 Dr. Saad B. H. Farid  Electron Microscopy of Materials 5 | / /  

4.  Distribution of e.g. Cu in welded steels (BSEI)

5.  Element analyze and imaging (EDS)

6.  Observation of multilayer binding (SEI, e.g. TiN-AlN on steel)

7/27/2019 5- Electron Microscopy of Materials.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-electron-microscopy-of-materialsdocx 6/11

 Dr. Saad B. H. Farid  Electron Microscopy of Materials 6 | / /  

7.  Analysis of fracture surface

Alumina, in-lens detector, 100 kX Brittle intergranular fracture

Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) image of intergrannular fracture indicative of hydrogenembrittlement. (Mag: 400X)

Ductile dimple fracture Fatigue crack Intragranular ductile failure

T T r r a a n n s s m m i i s s s s i i o o n n E E l l e e c c t t r r o o n n M M i i c c r r o o s s c c o o p p y y  TTEEMM See figure next page. The SEM becomes a microprobe analyzer (EPMA) when an X-

ray detector is added, or a STEM when the detector is moved below the specimen. In a

similar way an X-ray detector and/or an electron energy loss spectrometer (EELS) can headded to a TEM to make an analytical EM (AEM). Addition of scanning coils to this

configuration results in a TEM/ STEM, while adding post-specimen lenses to a dedicatedSTEM at the other end of the diagram would achieve virtually the same configuration. The

two ends of the Figure therefore effectively meet.

Preparation of specimens for TEM 

A specimen must first be prepared before any observations can be made. It is not

straightforward to make a specimen thin enough for TEM (a few tens of nanometers to a

micron in thickness). The task is made harder still by the need to avoid changes in thespecimen due to the preparation technique, and obtain a representative (or sometimes very

specific) region. The sample must also be strong enough to handle, and last at least long

enough to be examined in the microscope. These are tough requirements, and only rarely are

7/27/2019 5- Electron Microscopy of Materials.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-electron-microscopy-of-materialsdocx 7/11

7/27/2019 5- Electron Microscopy of Materials.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-electron-microscopy-of-materialsdocx 8/11

 Dr. Saad B. H. Farid  Electron Microscopy of Materials 8 | / /  

electrolyte to low temperatures is often employed to change the kinetics of the etching

 process to produce a smooth surface.

2. Mechanical poli shing 

Most materials science samples will he ground and/or polished as a first stage in the

specimen preparation process. Grinding is usually done using paper which has a layer of hard particles, often SiC, stuck onto one face. The paper is graded according to the particle

size, which can vary from a sizeable fraction of a millimeter to only a few microns. Usually

the paper is placed on a wheel which spins while being lubricated by flowing water. The

specimen is mounted on a jig, often using glue or thermoplastic wax, which allows the rate

of removal of material to be controlled. The sample is initially ground flat using a coarse grit,

and successively finer grits are used to remove the damage inflicted on the sample by the

 previous stage. Final polishing is often done using diamond powder a micron or less in size,

either suspended in oil or water or embedded in a plastic film. Even finer polishing can be

 performed using mechano-chemical means, often using colloidal silica particles floating in

an alkaline liquid.

7/27/2019 5- Electron Microscopy of Materials.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-electron-microscopy-of-materialsdocx 9/11

 Dr. Saad B. H. Farid  Electron Microscopy of Materials 9 | / /  

Appli cations of SEM (a Collection) 

1.  Dislocation structure

(diffraction contrast)

2.  BF and DF images of dispersive precipitates in e.g. Al-Cr-Zr alloy

7/27/2019 5- Electron Microscopy of Materials.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-electron-microscopy-of-materialsdocx 10/11

 Dr. Saad B. H. Farid  Electron Microscopy of Materials 10 | / /  

3.  Observation of Organics

This meets versatile medical, biological pharmacological and other applications.

4.  HR (high resolution) image of  phase in Al alloys

Bright Field BF

Dark Field DF

7/27/2019 5- Electron Microscopy of Materials.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-electron-microscopy-of-materialsdocx 11/11

 Dr. Saad B. H. Farid  Electron Microscopy of Materials 11 | / /  

5.  HR contrast image of metal atom arrangement in 1,97 nm thick specimen

of Nb-W-O

G  D Luck