4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"
-
Upload
rhetoricked -
Category
Documents
-
view
420 -
download
0
Transcript of 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"
![Page 1: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Examining a Twitter-Based Discourse Community
of Composition Scholars
Brian N. Larson@Rhetoricked / www.Rhetoricked.com
Department of Writing Studies, University of Minnesota
Finding problems with
![Page 2: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Social network graph visualization
![Page 3: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Motivation
• Ph.D. Seminar spring 2012– “Emerging Genres on the Internet”– Dr. Carol Berkenkotter
• Do certain Twitter practices constituted genres?– But genres belong to communities– …or to activity systems– Both theoretically bounded
![Page 4: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Problem
• What theoretically licensed means can I use to sample a subset of the Twitter population?
• Can I implement that practically?• I smugly proposed what’s in the paper• I now repent, but think the questions are still
worth exploring
![Page 5: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Outline: Define your terms, get some data, and see where you’re at!
• Dealing with the Twitter fire hose• “Discourse community lite”• Social network theory basics• Example of data from 2012 CCCCs• Urging caution, suggesting next steps
![Page 6: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Challenge: Sampling Twitter
• Genre theory considers communities– Swales 1990; Berkenkotter & Huckin 1994; Russell
1994 (activity systems); Devitt 2004 (communities, collectives, social networks)
• How to sample? Sparsity problems– Twitter has 200 million active users– More than ½ billion tweets per day (5500/second)– Need a “root”
![Page 7: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Hashtag as root?
• Potential virtues– Easy to search for– Definitive threshold characteristic
• Potential vices– Unknown relation to theoretical concerns– Over- and under-inclusive
• How about hashtag + follows of users of hashtag?– Assumption: Many communities within hashtag sample
![Page 8: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Community? Twitter users span geographies and topics
• (Gruzd et al. 2010)• A common language• “Temporality” or community shares “a consciousness of
a shared temporal dimension in which they co-exist” • The decline in prominence of “high centers”• Interactivity among members• A variety of communicators• “[C]ommon public place where members can meet and interact”• “[S]ustained membership over time”
![Page 9: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Community: Sense of community
• (Gruzd et al. 2010)• Members feel that they are members• Members have influence within the
community• Community meets some member needs• Members share an emotional connection
![Page 10: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Network analysis theory
• A graph– “Nodes” or “vertices” represent individuals– “Edges” or “arcs” represent relationships between
the individuals. • In visual representations– A node is represented as a point on the graph– An edge is a line between nodes– An arc is a line with an arrow, i.e., a unidirectional
relationship
![Page 11: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Figure 2: Friendship diagram
Example of network graph. Source: Wikimedia commons.
![Page 12: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Figure 2: Friendship diagram
{(1,2), (1,5), (2,3), (2,5), (3,4), (4,5), (4,6)}
![Page 13: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Figure 2: Density
Complete graph = = 15 Density = Edges/15 = 7/15 = 0.467
![Page 14: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Figure 2: Degree centrality
①Degree = 2②Degree = 3③Degree = 2④Degree = 3⑤Degree = 3⑥Degree = 1
Higher = more central
Total edges connecting to node
![Page 15: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Figure 2: Closeness centrality
①Closeness = 1.8② ③Closeness = 1.6④ ⑤Closeness = 1.4⑥
Lower = more central
Average distance from node to each other node
![Page 16: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Figure 2: Betweenness centrality and clustering coefficient
![Page 17: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Centrality summarized
• Degree: How many connections does node have?
• Closeness: How close is node to other nodes in graph?
• Betweenness: To what extent does node lie along “critical paths”?
![Page 18: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
What are the edges in Twitter?
• Not necessarily reciprocal: They are directional or “arcs”
• I follow you, you may or may not follow me• I @-reply to you…• I retweet you…
![Page 19: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Community candidate variables
• Start with a Twitter hashtag– Possibily over- and under-inclusive…
• Bound sample in time• Find who each subscriber follows• Interactivity among members: Density of edges
representing @-replies and retweets among candidate group members
• Individual influence: Density of edges representing @-replies and retweets among candidate group members
![Page 20: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
CCCC 2012: Twitter data set
• Jen Michaels set up the archive• March 9-23, 2012• CCCCs hashtags• 5,000+ tweets, nearly 600 subscribers• Power distribution of tweets– About 115 subscribers tweeted >10 times– Fewer than 60 tweeted >25 times– Six subscribers tweeted 100+ times each
![Page 21: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
CCCC 2012: Generating a graph
• NodeXL (Hansen et al. 2010)– Open source options exist, e.g., NetworkX
(http://networkx.github.com/; written in Python) • Generate graph• (Example used limited data)
![Page 22: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
CCCC 2012: First graph visualization attempt
![Page 23: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Qualitative research is needed
• Systematic exploration of Tweets is fine, BUT• We need qualitative research regarding Twitter
account holders and their accounts– To what extent do members of candidate communities
feel or believe that the candidate theoretical communities are real communities?
– To what extent to those who retweet and @-reply to each other feel that those actions are constitutive of a community among them?
– To what extent should we include ‘institutional accounts’?
![Page 24: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Challenges
• IRB approvals• Copyright concerns• Twitter (and other) terms of use• Participants’ willingness
![Page 25: 4C13 J.15 Larson "Twitter based discourse community"](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081400/554a3bd9b4c905863d8b4abb/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Next steps
• Different data (problems with 2012 CCCCs data; problems with my involvement)– Go for several smaller-volume hashtags to find baselines
• Collaborators?– Computational linguists & computer scientists– Other writing studies researchers
Brian N. Larson@Rhetoricked / www.Rhetoricked.com
Department of Writing Studies, University of Minnesota