4 - Decisions Involving Multiple Objectives MCDA- Chapter 3

21
 El siguiente material se reproduce con fines estrictamente académicos para estudiantes, profesores y colaboradores de la Universidad ICESI, de acuerdo con el Artículo 32 de la Ley 23 de 1982. Y con el Artículo 22 de la Decisión 351 de la Comisión del Acuerdo de Cartagena.  ARTÍCULO 32: “Es permitido utilizar obras literarias o artísticas o parte de ellas, a título de ilustración en obras destinadas a la enseñanza, por medio de publicaciones, emisiones o radiodifusiones o grabaciones sonoras o visuales, dentro de los límites justificados por el fin propuesto o comunicar con propósito de enseñanza la obra radiodifundida para fines escolares educativos, universitarios y de formación personal sin fines de lucro, con la obligación de mencionar el nombre del autor y el título de las así utilizadas”.  Artículo 22 de la Decisión 351 de la Comisión del Acuerdo Cartagena.  ARTÍCULO 22: Sin prejuicio de lo dispuesto en el Capítulo V y en el Artículo anterior, será lícito realizar, sin la autorización del autor y sin el pago de remuneración alguna, los siguientes actos: b) Reproducir por medio reprográficos para la enseñanza o para la realización de exámenes en instituciones educativas, en la medida justificada por el fin que se persiga, artículos lícitamente publicados en periódicos o colecciones periódicas, o breves extractos de obras lícitamente publicadas, a condición que tal utilización se haga conforme a los usos honrados y que la misma no sea objeto de venta o transacción a título oneroso, ni tenga directa o indirectamente fines de lucro;...”.

Transcript of 4 - Decisions Involving Multiple Objectives MCDA- Chapter 3

  • El siguiente material se reproduce con fines estrictamente acadmicos para estudiantes, profesores y colaboradores de la Universidad ICESI, de acuerdo con el Artculo 32 de la Ley 23 de 1982. Y con el Artculo 22 de la Decisin 351 de la Comisin del Acuerdo de Cartagena. ARTCULO 32: Es permitido utilizar obras literarias o artsticas o parte de ellas, a ttulo de ilustracin en obras destinadas a la enseanza, por medio de publicaciones, emisiones o radiodifusiones o grabaciones sonoras o visuales, dentro de los lmites justificados por el fin propuesto o comunicar con propsito de enseanza la obra radiodifundida para fines escolares educativos, universitarios y de formacin personal sin fines de lucro, con la obligacin de mencionar el nombre del autor y el ttulo de las as utilizadas. Artculo 22 de la Decisin 351 de la Comisin del Acuerdo Cartagena. ARTCULO 22: Sin prejuicio de lo dispuesto en el Captulo V y en el Artculo anterior, ser lcito realizar, sin la autorizacin del autor y sin el pago de remuneracin alguna, los siguientes actos: b) Reproducir por medio reprogrficos para la enseanza o para la realizacin de exmenes en instituciones educativas, en la medida justificada por el fin que se persiga, artculos lcitamente publicados en peridicos o colecciones peridicas, o breves extractos de obras lcitamente publicadas, a condicin que tal utilizacin se haga conforme a los usos honrados y que la misma no sea objeto de venta o transaccin a ttulo oneroso, ni tenga directa o indirectamente fines de lucro;....

  • n Ivi 9 mu pi :8

  • ....

    DECISIONS INVOLVING MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES: SMART

  • AN OVERVIEW OF THE ANALYSIS

    below:

    Location of office

    Addison 8ilton Village Carlisle Walk Denver Street Elton Street Filton Village Gorton

    (A) (8) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G)

    Annual rent ($)

    30000 15000 5000 12000 30000 15000 10000

    to 6.

    as possible, he would also Addison is in a

    but it is to rent. lt is staff to work in. In

  • DECISIONS INVOLVING MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES: SMART

    tree can be

  • CONSTRUCTING A VALUE TREE

    Rent Electricity Cleaning Closeness Visibility Image Size Comlort Car to customers parking

    3.1 A value tree for the office location DroDlem

  • 36 DECISIONS INVOlVING MUlTIPlE OBJECTIVES: SMART

    whether it is an accurate and 2 sug-

    that are concern to

    a

  • MEASURING HOW WELL THE OPTIONS PERFORM ON EACH ATIRIBUTE

    tree went

    Table 3.1 Costs associated with the seven offices

    Annual Annual

    OHica Annual rant ($) costs ($) costs ($) Total cost

    30000 3000 2000 35000 Bilton 15000 2000 800 17800 Carlsle Walk 5000 1 000 700 6700 Denver Street 12000 1 000 1 100 14100 Elton 30000 2500 2300 34800 Filton Village 15000 1 000 2600 18600 Gorton 10000 1 100 900 12000

  • DECISIONS INVOLVING MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES: SMART

  • MEASURING HOW WELL THE OPTIONS PERFORM ON EACH ATIRIBUTE

    3.2 A vaJue scale for office

    Value 100 I---L~~~~~

    90-----~_E~lwto~nLS~t~re~e~t~

    80

    70-~--~JF~ilwto~n~V~illilla~e~

    60

    50

    40

    30~~--t=fD~env~e~r}S~t~re~eitJ 20 1-~~:2IU::>g:

    101-~~~~~~ O L_-r-r.;;;r~W;k1

    as an increase

  • DECISIONS INVOLVING MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES: SMART

    Table 3.2 ~ Values and

    Attribute

    Closeness 32 26 23

    Size 10 Comfort 6

    3

    Benefits

    A B e

    100 20 80 60 80 70

    100 10 o 75 30 o o 100 10

    90 30 100

    80.8 39.4 47.4

    can

    strength VLU'-~O is shown below:

    Addison Bilton Village Carlisle Walk Oenver Street Elton Street Filton Village Gorton

    (A) (B) (C) (O) (E) (F)

    Office

    D

    70 50 30 55 30 90

    52.3

    Floor area

    1000 550 400 800

    1500 400 700

    in area froID 500 to 1000

    an increase aUractive. To

    E

    40 60 90

    100 60 70

    64.8

    on aa-lOO we can r>v,'"""",,,, as follows.

    F G

    o 60 o 100

    70 20 o 50

    80 50 o 80

    20.9 60.2

  • MEASURING HOW WELL THE OPTIONS PERFORM ON EACH ATTRIBUTE 41

    The owner judges that, the it is. largest Street, an area t so we can 1500 a value of 100. In

    v(1500) = lOO, where v(1500) means Walk and FiIton Village) both

    the office areas that faH between rptprt'pt! areas. We could ask the owner to rate the areas

    under consideration the methods of the section. beca use areas involving awkward numbers are involved, it be easier to what 1S known as a methods can function, but one of the most widely 1S

    requires owner to identify an office area halfway between the preferred are a (400 and the most area (1500 fe). Note area does not necessarily have to to of one of lnitially, owner suggests that the midpoint area would that an 400 to 1000 is just as aUractive as an increase 1000 to 1500 sorne he rejects this increases from smaller areas will, he reasons, reduce so be much more attrac-tive than increases areas, which would only lead to minor

    "H,D1"C\,rf other candidates for the midpoint position (for as Finally, he that 700

    identified the midpoint the to the 'quarter-points'. first of these will be the area that a value between the least area (400 and the midpoint area (700 fe). He decides that is 500 , so v(500) = Similarly, we ask him to identify an area has a value halfway between the midpoint area (700 fe) the best area (1500 fe). He judges this to be 1000 f which implies that v(1000) = We now have the for five fIoor areas, and this enables us to plot the function for office is shown in 3.3. value function can now be used to estimate

    the actual areas of offices consideration. example, the Bilton Village office has an area 550 the curve suggests that the area is about

    A applied to the 'closeness to by the variable 'distance fram town , and the

    value function is shown in Note that the the distance from the town center, the lower the value will curve also suggests a move fram O to 2 miles fram the town center is more damagng to business than a move fram 6 to 8 values identified for the seven in terms

    to are shown in

  • 3.3

    DECISIONS INVOLVING MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES: SMART

    100

    75 --- - - ---

    (j) :; ~ 50 - -

    Oflice floor area

    a value function for office floor area

    100

    75

    (j) :; 50 (ti >

    25

    00 ----L 2 4 6 Distance Irom town center (miles)

    8

    3.4 - A value function for distance fmm customers

  • DETERMINING THE WEIGHTS OF THE ATIRIBUTES

    can to

    Floor area

    X 400 y 402

    to the would

    Office Fioor area

    X O Y 100 Weights 5

    problems. see

    Distance from customers

    O miles 15 miles

    as follows:

    Distance from customers

    100 O 1

    100 500

    ( or swing) from in another

  • DECISIONS INVOLVING MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES: SMART

    attributes

    'closeness to this change has would next choose to move to and so on,

    until all the owner' s are as follows:

    (1) to customers

    We can now assessed as foUows. location to the most

    100. a swing from

    most distant location customers some decides that swing in 'visibility' is

    80(X) as as the swing in 'doseness to customers', so visibility is a weight of a swing from the worst 'image' to best is considered to

    as important as a swing from worst to the best location 'doseness to customers', so s assgned a weight of 70. procedure is for all the other attributes, illustrates the

    obtained sum to 310, and it is conventional to to 100 (this will later stages of the analysis to

    is by dividing weight the sum of the weights multiplying by 100:

    Attribute

    Closeness to customers Visibility

    Size Comfort

    facilities

    100 80 70 30 20

    310

    Normalized w"".n"'I"'" (to nearest whole number)

    32 26 23 10 6 3

    100

  • AGGREGATING THE BENEFITS USING THE ADDITIVE MODEL

    100 Bes!

    80 Bes!

    O Worst

    Derivation of is considered to be

    to customers

    Wors!

    Bes!

    Worst

    For

    1"'" Worst 1 Bes! Worst Best Wors! from the worst to the best location for worst to the best location for closeness

    in the 'working the appropriate lower-level weights, so

    Agg

    for workng conditions is 9

    model We now have (1) a measure how well on weights enable us to compare the values allocated to one allocated to the The next is to how well

    combining the six value scores allocated to do this, we will assume the model is

    this simply adding an weighted value scores to measure of its overall benefits. model is the most widely

  • 46 DECISIONS INVOLVING MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES: SMART

    Attribute Addison values Value x

    to customers 100 32 3200 Visibility 60 26 1560

    100 23 2300 Size 75 10 750 Comfort O 6 O

    facilities 90 3 8080

  • TRADING BENEFITS AGAINST COSTS

    100

    A "-',

    J!l "

    '$ x E e (!)

    xD J::J 50 e

  • DECISIONS INVOLVING MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES: SMART

  • SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

    100

    90

    Weight placed on turnover

    3.7 - for on turnover

  • INVOLVING MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES: SMART