3rd Brainstorming session Industry- Academia Interaction
-
Upload
allistair-haley -
Category
Documents
-
view
37 -
download
1
description
Transcript of 3rd Brainstorming session Industry- Academia Interaction
3rd Brainstorming session Industry- Academia Interaction
Workforce Sustainability & Talent Management in India Oil & Gas Upstream Industry
A Study conducted by PETROFEDin association with Knowledge Partner PricewaterhouseCoopers
Deepak Mahurkar, Associate Director, PwCOctober 17, 2008
Contents
Introduction
Approach & Methodology
Key Findings: Demand-Supply Gap Analysis
Recommendations: Stakeholder-wise action steps
Contents
Introduction
Approach & Methodology
Key Findings: Demand-Supply Gap Analysis
Recommendations: Stakeholder-wise action steps
4
Globally, for the last several years, Oil & Gas industry has been plagued by shortages.
Shortages in the Oil & Gas Industry
Shortages
Refining Capacity
Talent
Supply of OilCapacity of service &
Supply Cos.
5
Engineering talent squeeze is likely to cause further delay in oil & gas production projects through 2010.
• 400 major projects in the next 5 years
• >55,500 engineering personnel required in 2010
• Engg and Proj Mgt personnel insufficient to meet 2007 upstream project demand
• With an average age of 51 years, over 50% of today’s workforce will retire by 2015 (6% attrition p.a.)
• Lack of experienced staff in the early-stage concept and pre-feasibility work phase expected to delay projects
Global Talent Squeeze
6
Recognizing the talent crunch being experienced by the E&P sector owing to the boom in the oil and gas upstream activity, MoPNG had advised PetroFed to conduct a detailed study and suggest actions.
• The study initially estimated manpower demand based on the projected E&P activity in India over the next
10 years and the findings were presented to MoPNG and its views were noted for finalisation of the report
in particular to include opportunity India may have for bridging global shortage of talent.
• Four scenarios of offering basinal areas for E&P activity were used to project the requirement of trained
manpower in subsequent rounds of NELP bidding .
• Inputs were obtained from leading organizations in the E&P sector (public sector, private sector and the oil
field service companies), MoPNG and educational institutions.
• These were supplemented with PwC’s in-house research and secondary research information available in
the public domain.
• A comparison of manpower demand and supply was used to assess workforce issues.
• The findings of the study were discussed with HR Directors of PSU Oil companies, senior industry officials,
some CEOs and senior officials of Service Companies and their comments were considered to finalise the
study.
• A report on the study was submitted to MoPNG in August 2006.
PetroFed Manpower Study
Contents
Introduction
Approach & Methodology
Key Findings: Demand-Supply Gap Analysis
Recommendations: Stakeholder-wise action steps
8
Study covered scenarios of human resources availability in the upstream industry and commented on the potential India has to develop such resources to service local and global needs of trained resources and actions needed.
Approach & Methodology
9
4 stage - activity based workforce projections model was used to project the manpower requirements for the projected E&P activity in India.
Approach & Methodology
• EXPLORATION• EXPLORATORY DRILLING• DEVELOPMENT DRILLING• PRODUCTION
• ACTIVITY BASED SKILL MAPS• EDUCATION • EXPERIENCE• RETIREMENT & ATTRITION
• PRESENCE OF PETROLEUM SYSTEM
• OIL PRICES• RIG AVAILABILITY
• TIMING OF AWARD OF PEL• AREA FOR EXPLORATION• DYNAMIC COMPLETION• SUCCESS RATE OF
ACTIVITIES
Contents
Introduction
Approach & Methodology
Key Findings: Demand-Supply Gap Analysis
Recommendations: Stakeholder-wise action steps
11
4 scenarios of acreage release by the GoI were considered.
Key findings: Demand-Supply Gap Analysis
Scenarios -Area awarded for exploration (cumulative)
800,000
1,300,000
1,800,000
2,300,000
2,800,000
2004
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Are
a in
sq.
km Scenario I
Scenario II
Scenario III
Scenario IV
….Addition of 12% area on an annual basis from 2007-10Scenario 1
Addition of variable % of area once every 2 years from 2008-14Scenario 4
Addition of 12% area once every 2 years from 2008-14Scenario 2Addition of 12% area once every 3 years from 2008-17Scenario 3
Source: PetroFed Manpower Study – PwC Analysis
12
India’s Oil & Gas industry is expected to face acute shortage of critical E&P skills in next ten years.
-2000
-1000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Geologists Logger Driller Tool Pusher Reservoir Engg Geophysicist
Demand-Supply Gap using Scenario 2*
Key findings: Demand-Supply Gap Analysis
Source: PetroFed Manpower Study * Scenario 2 selected as most likely based on presentation to MoPNG
13
E&P skill-sets take time to be developed. We have to act now to address such an alarming “talent squeeze” situation.
Key findings: Demand-Supply Gap Analysis
Source: Scenario 2, India - PetroFed Manpower Study
Skill Set Year (of peak demand-
supply gap)
Demand Supply Projected Peak Demand –
Supply Gap
Demand per unit Supply
Geologists 2010 3955 1702 2,253 2.32
Loggers 2017 1289 281 1,008 4.59
Tool Pushers 2017 469 179 290 2.62
Drillers 2017 2329 774 1,555 3.01
Geophysicists 2010 4967 1471 3,496 3.38
Reservoir Engineer 2017 4071 752 3,319 5.41
14
Higher Education
2%
Others (IT, Communic
ations)29%
Oil Industry
Mineral & Mining13%
56%* Of the 400+ Petro-technical students graduating annually only 56% join O&G industry.
At entry level, limited awareness of job opportunities driving students to other industries. >850* critical skills to retire in the next decade.
Key findings: Demand-Supply Gap Analysis
• Import of skills
• Poaching of mid-career talent (4%
overseas attrition)
• Hiring of Indian talent at entry level
to feed global demand (12% talent
generated went overseas)
*PwC E&P Education Institute Survey 2006
Contents
Introduction
Approach & Methodology
Key Findings: Demand-Supply Gap Analysis
Recommendations: Stakeholder-wise action steps
16
A Comprehensive “employment life-cycle planning” approach is required to address India’s E&P talent crunch situation.
• Capacity build up through expansion as well as addition of institutes
• Attract high caliber students into the courses
Education
Entry
Mid-Career
Retirement
• Recruitment strategy to hire best talent• Specialized training to help develop the skills in
the shortest time• Retention programs
• Ensure effective utilization of resource• Career planning and coaching/ mentoring to
maintain talent quality• Retention programs
• Utilizing vast experience base to nurture younger talent through coaching and mentoring ahead of superannuation and post retirement
Recommendations: Stakeholders-wise action steps
17
• Full involvement in Industry-Academia interface
• Enhance infrastructure and curriculum
• Establish feedback and audit mechanism
• Implement attractive programmes to orient students to O&G ind.
• Cater to global opportunities through collaborations, exchange programmes etc.
Industry Academia
Government
• “Go Explore” campaign
• Joint Committee of MoPNG & HRD Ministry to monitor talent requirements
• Budgetary support (OIDB) for new institutes
• Curriculum review of existing institutes
• Financial assistance for infrastructure enhancement
• Manpower planning with Joint Committee
• Industry-Academia interface
• “Go explore” assistance
• Set up mechanisms for knowledge transfer
• Industry sponsorship, scholarship schemes
• Apprenticeship, training opportunities for students
Recommendations: Stakeholders-wise action steps
Thank you
19
Demand side projections - Scenarios
88%27679533600002500027500060000NELP 102010
77%24079533600002500027500060000NELP 92009
65%20479533600002500027500060000NELP 82008
54%16879533600002500027500060000NELP 72007
% areas opened for explorationCUMULATIVETOTALOFFSHOREDEEPWATERON-LANDNELP #YEAR
88%27679533600002500027500060000NELP 102010
77%24079533600002500027500060000NELP 92009
65%20479533600002500027500060000NELP 82008
54%16879533600002500027500060000NELP 72007
% areas opened for explorationCUMULATIVETOTALOFFSHOREDEEPWATERON-LANDNELP #YEAR
88%27679533600002500027500060000NELP 102014
77%24079533600002500027500060000NELP 92012
65%20479533600002500027500060000NELP 82010
54%16879533600002500027500060000NELP 72008
% areas opened for explorationCUMULATIVETOTALOFFSHOREDEEPWATERON-LANDNELP #YEAR
88%27679533600002500027500060000NELP 102014
77%24079533600002500027500060000NELP 92012
65%20479533600002500027500060000NELP 82010
54%16879533600002500027500060000NELP 72008
% areas opened for explorationCUMULATIVETOTALOFFSHOREDEEPWATERON-LANDNELP #YEAR
88%27679533600002500027500060000NELP 102017
77%24079533600002500027500060000NELP 92014
65%20479533600002500027500060000NELP 82011
54%16879533600002500027500060000NELP 72008
% areas opened for explorationCUMULATIVETOTALOFFSHOREDEEPWATERON-LANDNELP #YEAR
88%27679533600002500027500060000NELP 102017
77%24079533600002500027500060000NELP 92014
65%20479533600002500027500060000NELP 82011
54%16879533600002500027500060000NELP 72008
% areas opened for explorationCUMULATIVETOTALOFFSHOREDEEPWATERON-LANDNELP #YEAR
Scenario 1 – Focus on immediate exploration
Scenario 2 – Focus on exploration staggered through the next decade
Scenario 3 – Focus on exploration staggered beyond the next decade
Note: Open Acreage system, if in place, is assumed to generate significant increase to comparable trends as in NELP rounds
77%24079532700001875020625045000NELP 102014
68%21379532700001875020625045000NELP 92012
59%18679532700001875020625045000NELP 82010
51%15979532700001875020625045000NELP 72008
% areas opened for explorationCUMULATIVETOTALOFFSHOREDEEPWATERON-LANDNELP #YEAR
77%24079532700001875020625045000NELP 102014
68%21379532700001875020625045000NELP 92012
59%18679532700001875020625045000NELP 82010
51%15979532700001875020625045000NELP 72008
% areas opened for explorationCUMULATIVETOTALOFFSHOREDEEPWATERON-LANDNELP #YEAR
Scenario 4 – Focus on exploration staggered through the next decade, less area opened for exploration
20
Organization & Work Groupings in the Upstream activity
Exploration Exploration Drilling
Developmental Drilling
Production
Geological
Field Party
Seismic
Field Party
Multi-
Disciplinary
Team
ProcessingMDT
Drilling Crew
Well Crew
MDT
Drilling Crew
Well Crew
Surface Facility
Development
MDT
Production
Geo physicist
Data Processors
Geoinformaticians
Observer
Supervisor
Geologist
Geophysicist
Petrophysicist
Geochemist
Reservoir Eng
Mud Logger
Programmer
MDT DRILLING CREW WELL CREWSEISMIC FIELD PARTY / PROCESSING
Drilling Suptd.
Tool Pusher
Driller
Asst Driller
Derrickman
Roughneck
Crane Operator
Roustabout
Chief Mechanic
Chief Electrician
Welder
Motorman
PRODUCTION
Oil Well Cementer
Acidizers
Perforator operators
Sample-taker
operators
Well pullers
Mining & geological
engineers
Chemical Eng
Mechanical Eng
Electrical Eng
Fire & Safety
Engineer
Corrosion Engineer
Instrumentation Eng
Technicians
Asst Technician
SURFACE FACILITY DEV. CREW
Chemical Eng
Mechanical Eng
Electrical Eng
Production Engg
Civil Engineer
Instrumentation Eng
Technicians
Asst Technician
Geologist
Geophysicist
Driller
Geochemist
Production Eng
Reservoir Eng
Petroleum Eng
Logger
SURFACE CREW
Demand side projections - Scenarios
21
Academic/Experience profile of roles in upstream working groups
3
3
3
1
3
5
5
2
4
3
5
4
Year of M
inim
um E
xperien
ce
*with electronics
Electrical, Instrumentation & Control Engineers
Mechanical Engineers
Civil Engineers
Production Engineers
Chemical / Process Engineers
Reservoir Engineer
Drilling Engineers
Programmer
Petrophysicist
Geoinformatics
*Geophysicist
Geologist
Other Engg
Civil Engg
Mechanical Engg
Electrical / Electronics Engg
Chem
ical / Process Engg
Drilling Engg
Petroleum Engg
Chem
istry
Physics
Com
puter Science
Maths
Geophysics
Geology
Academic Profile
Job
3
3
3
1
3
5
5
2
4
3
5
4
Year of M
inim
um E
xperien
ce
*with electronics
Electrical, Instrumentation & Control Engineers
Mechanical Engineers
Civil Engineers
Production Engineers
Chemical / Process Engineers
Reservoir Engineer
Drilling Engineers
Programmer
Petrophysicist
Geoinformatics
*Geophysicist
Geologist
Other Engg
Civil Engg
Mechanical Engg
Electrical / Electronics Engg
Chem
ical / Process Engg
Drilling Engg
Petroleum Engg
Chem
istry
Physics
Com
puter Science
Maths
Geophysics
Geology
Academic Profile
Job
Accepted
Preferred
Accepted
PreferredSource: PwC Analysis based on industry interaction
Demand side projections - Scenarios
22
Education and experience criticality of various skills
Source: PwC Analysis based on industry interaction
Profile of Positions
Geophysicist
Geologist
Geochemist
Logger
Reservoir Eng
Driller
Data Processors
Roughnecks
Tool Pusher
Petrophysicist
Petroleum Eng
Production Eng
Programmer
Engineering
Chemical Eng
Roustabouts
Oil Well Cementer
Technicians
Crane Operator
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0
EDUCATION
EX
PE
RIE
NC
E
NO
R
EL
EV
AN
T
EX
PER
IEN
CE
Inst / Civil / Electrical / Fire &Safety / Corrosion EngineersUNSKILLED SPECIALIZED
SKILLS
HIG
H L
EV
EL
S O
F
EX
PER
IEN
CE Profile of Positions
Geophysicist
Geologist
Geochemist
Logger
Reservoir Eng
Driller
Data Processors
Roughnecks
Tool Pusher
Petrophysicist
Petroleum Eng
Production Eng
Programmer
Engineering
Chemical Eng
Roustabouts
Oil Well Cementer
Technicians
Crane Operator
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0
EDUCATION
EX
PE
RIE
NC
E
NO
R
EL
EV
AN
T
EX
PER
IEN
CE
Inst / Civil / Electrical / Fire &Safety / Corrosion EngineersUNSKILLED SPECIALIZED
SKILLS
HIG
H L
EV
EL
S O
F
EX
PER
IEN
CE
Demand side projections - Scenarios
23
Demand side projections - Scenarios for critical skills with high experience M
AN
POW
ER R
EQU
IREM
ENTS
YEARS
2008-2014 - Scenario 2
2008-2017 - Scenario 3 2008-2014 - Scenario 4
2007-2010 - Scenario 1
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Geophysicist
Geologist
Reservoir Engr
Driller
Logger
Geochemist
Tool Pusher
Drilling Suptd.
Petrophysicist
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Geophysicist
Geologist
Reservoir Engr
Driller
Logger
Geochemist
Tool Pusher
Drilling Suptd.
Petrophysicist
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Geophysicist
Geologist
Reservoir Engr
Driller
Logger
Geochemist
Tool Pusher
Drilling Suptd.
Petrophysicist
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Geophysicist
Geologist
Reservoir Engr
Driller
Logger
Geochemist
Tool Pusher
Drilling Suptd.
Petrophysicist
24
Demand side projections - Scenarios for skills requiring low/medium education with high experience M
AN
POW
ER R
EQU
IREM
ENTS
YEARS
2008-2014 - Scenario 2
2008-2017 - Scenario 3 2008-2014 - Scenario 4
2007-2010 - Scenario 1
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Roustabouts
Roughnecks
Asst Driller
Oil Well Cementer
Observers
Draftsmen
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Roustabouts
Roughnecks
Asst Driller
Oil Well Cementer
Observers
Draftsmen
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Roustabouts
Roughnecks
Asst Driller
Oil Well Cementer
Observers
Draftsmen
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Roustabouts
Roughnecks
Asst Driller
Oil Well Cementer
Observers
Draftsmen
25
Demand side projections - Scenarios for skills requiring general education with low experience M
AN
POW
ER
RE
QU
IRE
ME
NT
S
YEARS
2008-2014 - Scenario 2
2008-2017 - Scenario 3 2008-2014 - Scenario 4
2007-2010 - Scenario 1
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Production Engr
Programmer
Data Processors
Electrical Engr
Mechanical Engr
Chemical Engr
Instrumentation Engr
Civil Engr
Corrosion Engineer
Fire & Safety Engineer
Structural Engr
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Production Engr
Programmer
Data Processors
Electrical Engr
Mechanical Engr
Chemical Engr
Instrumentation Engr
Civil Engr
Corrosion Engineer
Fire & Safety Engineer
Structural Engr
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Production Engr
Programmer
Data Processors
Electrical Engr
Mechanical Engr
Chemical Engr
Instrumentation Engr
Civil Engr
Corrosion Engineer
Fire & Safety Engineer
Structural Engr
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Production Engr
Programmer
Data Processors
Electrical Engr
Mechanical Engr
Chemical Engr
Instrumentation Engr
Civil Engr
Corrosion Engineer
Fire & Safety Engineer
Structural Engr
26
Demand side projections - Scenarios for skills requiring low/medium education with moderate level of experience
MA
NP
OW
ER
RE
QU
IRE
ME
NT
S
YEARS
2008-2014 - Scenario 2
2008-2017 - Scenario 3 2008-2014 - Scenario 4
2007-2010 - Scenario 1
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Technicians
Crane Operator
Derrickman
Motorman
Chief Electrician
Chief Mechanic
Electrician
Welder
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Technicians
Crane Operator
Derrickman
Motorman
Chief Electrician
Chief Mechanic
Electrician
Welder
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Technicians
Crane Operator
Derrickman
Motorman
Chief Electrician
Chief Mechanic
Electrician
Welder
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Technicians
Crane Operator
Derrickman
Motorman
Chief Electrician
Chief Mechanic
Electrician
Welder
27
Supply side estimation – Key Stakeholders
Educational Institutes
Industry
GovernmentStudents -future workforce
Public Sector Undertakings
Private Companies
Oil Field Services
MoPNG
MHRD
Governing bodies – AICTE, UGC
28
Supply side estimation
Ministry of Human Resources and Development (MHRD)
Department of Higher Education Department of School Education & Literacy
University & Higher Education, Minorities Education, book promotion & copyrights
Technical Education
Vocational education, distance education& scholarships
Planning
M.Sc GeoInformatics (25)
M.Sc Geology (231)
M.Sc GeoPhysics (148)
M.Sc GeoChemistry
M.Sc Petrophysics
Drilling
Petrochemical (190)
Mechanical (63840)
Petroleum (60)
Others
Source: Numbers in bracket indicates intake for the colleges listed in next slide
The fresh talent pool for the E&P industry is sourced from amongst science graduates, engineers and diploma holders. An overview of our educational set-up viz these streams is provided below:
29
Supply side estimation
Source: Numbers in bracket indicates intake for the colleges listed in next slide
The E&P sector requires specialist skills in the form of technical graduates with specialization in courses related to petroleum, earth-sciences and processes like drilling. The number of institutes offering these courses is limited and has a low intake on an annual basis. The top institutions for sourcing talent educated in E&P related studies and the courses/certifications awarded therein, are listed below:
NAME OF INSTITUTE
COURSES OFFERED
ISM, Dhanbad Chemistry, Computer Science, Mechanical, Drilling, Environment, Petroleum, Applied Geophysics, Petroleum Exploration, Fuel
IT, Roorkee Geology, Geophysics, ChemicalIT, BHU Chemical, EnvironmentAndhra University Chemical, Geo-engineering, Applied Geology, Environment, Geology,
GeophysicsIIT, Mumbai Chemical, Applied Geology, Applied GeophysicsIIT Kharagpur Chemical, Geology, Geophysics, Applied GeologyCochin University Chemical, Environment, Instrumentation, Marine Geology, Marine
Geophysics, Safety & Fire, Kurukshetra University
Geophysics, Environment
Osmania University Chemistry, Geochemistry, Geology, Geophysics, Environment
MIT Pune Petroleum, Petrochem, Jadavpur University Chemical, Energy, Environment, Applied Geology
Kolkata University Instrumentation, Chemical, Petrochemical, Environment, Geology